Communication and Team Decision Making Part 1: Sharpening the Team Mind: Communication and Collective Intelligence A.    What are some of the possible biases and points of error that may arise in team communication systems? In addition to those cited in the opening of Chapter 6, what are some other examples of how team communication problems can lead to disaster? B.      Revisit communication failure examples in Exhibit 6-1. Identify the possible causes of communication or decision-making failure in each example, and, drawing on the information presented in the chapter, discuss  measures that might have prevented problems from arising within each team’s communication system. Part 2: Team Decision-Making: Pitfalls and Solution s A.    What are the key symptoms of groupthink? What problems and shortcomings can arise in the decision-making process as a result of groupthink?  B.    Do you think that individuals or groups are better decision-makers? Justify your choice. In what situations would individuals be more effective decision-makers than groups, and in what situations would groups be better than individuals? I am adding my classmate's response for the above question. You will have to write response for each post in 150 words. No references needed.  Discussion 1: Communication Problems In an organization there are lot of communication problems, some of the major communication problems can be. Ambiguity in the information: This kind of ambiguity is when there we cannot provide important explanation or even able to provide options for the information, when we provide a project to a client or to teammates we need to provide all the information and give all the information and should research at every cost and should be able to understand and provide the document for the missing information. Anchoring to one point of the information: This is when any person in the team relying so much on one point of the information. That person can make all the decisions or any kind of information based on just that point because as everyone says first impression is best impression, So when the person takes decision then we will take all decisions when you provide information on this buyers will get good impression on the team and the brand can become good. Providing too much information: When a manager or someone gives lot of information about the project and also give lot of information on something, this might not give time for the processing of those information and which doesn’t give enough bullet points or clarity about the project which makes in unclear project and requirements. Useless roles: This is when there are lot of chain of people for the approval of something and all of them have same title and it is very unclear to whom to go for the information, when this happens we do not know where the project is tending and if it get stuck we don’t know where to go and keep the project running. Poor decision-making skills: Wh.

1. Communication and Team Decision Making
Part 1: Sharpening the Team Mind: Communication and
Collective Intelligence
A. What are some of the possible biases and points of error
that may arise in team communication systems? In addition to
those cited in the opening of Chapter 6, what are some other
examples of how team communication problems can lead to
disaster?
B. Revisit communication failure examples in Exhibit 6-1.
Identify the possible causes of communication or decision-
making failure in each example, and, drawing on the
information presented in the chapter, discuss measures that
might have prevented problems from arising within each team’s
communication system.
Part 2: Team Decision-Making: Pitfalls and
Solution
s
A. What are the key symptoms of groupthink? What problems
and shortcomings can arise in the decision-making process as a

2. result of groupthink?
B. Do you think that individuals or groups are better decision-
makers? Justify your choice. In what situations would
individuals be more effective decision-makers than groups, and
in what situations would groups be better than individuals?
I am adding my classmate's response for the above question.
You will have to write response for each post in 150 words. No
references needed.
Discussion 1:
Communication Problems
In an organization there are lot of communication problems,
some of the major communication problems can be.

3. Ambiguity in the information: This kind of ambiguity is when
there we cannot provide important explanation or even able to
provide options for the information, when we provide a project
to a client or to teammates we need to provide all the
information and give all the information and should research at
every cost and should be able to understand and provide the
document for the missing information.
Anchoring to one point of the information: This is when any
person in the team relying so much on one point of the
information. That person can make all the decisions or any kind
of information based on just that point because as everyone says
first impression is best impression, So when the person takes
decision then we will take all decisions when you provide
information on this buyers will get good impression on the team
and the brand can become good.
Providing too much information: When a manager or someone
gives lot of information about the project and also give lot of
information on something, this might not give time for the
processing of those information and which doesn’t give enough
bullet points or clarity about the project which makes in unclear

4. project and requirements.
Useless roles: This is when there are lot of chain of people for
the approval of something and all of them have same title and it
is very unclear to whom to go for the information, when this
happens we do not know where the project is tending and if it
get stuck we don’t know where to go and keep the project
running.
Poor decision-making skills: When a decision is taking without
doing any research or anything in the project and lack of data
and making decision saying that we can do it and about the
project and looking all these will result in poor decision-
making, sometimes even when the decision is about to take and
by the time we know about the data and look for the results in
loss of the project
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
Discussion 2:

5. Part 1:
The sender and the receiver have two sides of the contact
process. We hear an extraordinary degree of concern but being a
versatile and savvy sender is comparatively important; it looks
fantastic. The sender has a letter, a fact, facts, an assessment, a
recommendation that he or she wants the other person or a
meeting. Moreover, find advises that it not only be heard but
also fairly swallowed by the sender that the corporate world
produces. (Valls, 2016) Affiliations manufacture and sell their
stuff all over the world. Clusters circumvented the universe in
the same way. It is no surprise that there is no shift in how
people united in different countries speak a wide variety of
dialects and cope with a wide range of social demands. While
we should be learning about mobile technologies, online
meetings, and web-buildings before long, we will in any case be
able to use the technologies to persuade people. This does not
explain the fact that most general managers speak English in
any situation, except that all general meetings take place in
English. (Chen, 2020) Such topical groupings have been
centered through knowledge gathered in the wake of social
gatherings, copied and livened, and divided during the process

6. to interpret main topical areas. Edge documents were created
for the purpose of isolating rehabilitation in the recovery
between different suppliers. As we found a fresh perspective,
exams started in an additional way. No matter how clear the
simple reasoning techniques and fundamental authority which
we shall address next maybe, we regularly do not care of or
prefer not to use such techniques. Perhaps may we try to cope
with a problem and then know that we are lost and need to go
back. (Valls, 2016) Through activities, I'm confident that we
have all completed one level. For a utilitarian side story, I
started up some carpentry late, and of course, splendid regard
for fundamental significance was established early. Because
about how the revolution of the technologies will cope with a
social event, founders and other people who require profound
logic will watch that they do not unwittingly follow any aspect
of the plan or force to get together. Such a lack of flexibility
may allow part entry to be stored and the connection and air to
the meeting to be adversely affected. (Chen, 2020)
Part 2:
For the duration of action, the participants in the association
should respond systematically and without confusion to

7. communication annoyance steps in order to verify whether there
are no other issues and no answers to be checked, but that they
can be basically suggested and explained. The question should
be such that one has the freedom to deal with the problem, in all
situations at the present time, not as a means of reacting to it.
Much of the time it does not require analyzing the available
male or female mind or knowledge of some other individual to
see what precisely it addresses and moves on. Commerce and
discussions at this stage will also check for the need to come
back in order to look at the matter fully. (Valls, 2016) A large
amount of ambiguities is multi-faceted, it is very important for
people in the organization to have a distinct impact on solutions
on all facets of the question, in order to avoid tremendous
reactions to each component. A few parts depending on how this
question is replied to. Comprehensive decision-making is
desirable to rely on the perspectives and expectations of more
individuals. They will then be more imaginative and promote a
judgment which is much more effective. What they should have
done as people will happen repeatedly in social matters.
Furthermore, the initiative is more irritating for the people to
whom it is referred. (Chen, 2020)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

8. Discussion 3:
The success of the party of an individual is formerly shut to
residence success, certain success as well as damaging the
discussion. A barrier that is significant the lack of crucial
communication with team individuals. Communication is
considered the most critical, plus the way it supervises it, since
it surely signifies people from the team. Altering and changing
with different people from the gathering that develop range that
is long communication is truly essential. Our team might not
presume if not use them aside from how our specialists will
definitely talk about within the after genuine dialogues
necessary and important characteristics which can be high. Our
professionals are likely to care for the concern along with our
team will discover that our company is likely to be really lost
undoubtedly as well as we should keep coming back. I am
particular (Halvorsen, 2018).
We have actually really accomplished the goal of work. Here is
the area that is perfect discover the style point on the site and

9. sometimes even just discover a very important factor to oversee
regarding the help carton. Formerly or especially and you also
need certainly to start. Here, our team are likely to talk about
the main combats of get-together, fundamental craftsmen, and
results in these tasks. It backs down, and you can find things
our company are performing truly when they're much like a
concern. To become really somebody who works great decision-
making abilities are in fact remarkably vital. Research verifies
that teams surpass individuals into the decision-making as the
choices and point of views supplied through group people are
now actually of remarkable quality that is high those of men and
women operating individually(Puncochar, 2016).