1. Seeing the Unseen
Presented December 2017, TAG Conference, Well-
Being Session
Hannah Cobb
University of Manchester
Hannah.Cobb@Manchester.ac.uk
@ArchaeoCobb
4. The National Picture vs. The Profession
2011 Census
• Gender: 51% women, 49%
men
• Disability: 82% do not have a
limiting long term limiting
health problem or disability
that limited their daily
activities
• Ethnicity: 87% white, 7%
asian/asian british, 3 %
black/african/caribbean/black
british, 2% mixed, 1%
gypsy/traveller/irish
traveller/other
2012/13 Profiling the Profession
• Gender: 46% women, 54%
men
• Disability: 98.2% do not have
a limiting long term limiting
health problem or disability
that limited their daily
activities
• Ethnicity: 99.2% white, 0.1%
asian/asian british, 0.1 %
black/african/caribbean/black
british, 0.2% mixed, 0.3%
gypsy/traveller/irish
traveller/other
6. Digging Diversity
• Digging Diversity 1: 2011
– Small scale – 5% of the UK Archaeological
Workforce
– Self identification immediately reveals greater
diversity in all areas BUT confirms PtP stats
– Significant differences in diversity between
students and professionals
@ArchaeoCobb
9. Digging Diversity
• Digging Diversity 1: 2011
– Small scale – 5% of the UK Archaeological
Workforce
– Self identification immediately reveals greater
diversity in all areas BUT confirms PtP stats
– Significant differences in diversity between
students and professionals
@ArchaeoCobb
10. Digging Diversity
• Digging Diversity 1: 2011
– Small scale – 5% of the UK Archaeological Workforce
– Self identification immediately reveals greater
diversity in all areas BUT confirms PtP stats
– Significant differences in diversity between students
and professionals
• Digging Diversity 2: 2017
– Expanded question set
– Broader reach in professionals – 12% of the UK
Archaeological Workforce
@ArchaeoCobb
11. Digging Diversity Caveats!
• Some modes of dissemination limit
participants
• Self selection = people with a greater interest
in diversity areas
• Student responses limited – only 292
• Professionals: 12% still fairly low
@ArchaeoCobb
12. Digging Diversity 2: Disability
• Do you have a disability?
• A disability is defined by the Equality Act 2010
as a physical or mental impairment that has a
‘substantial’ and ‘long-term’ negative effect on
your ability to do normal daily activities.
– ‘substantial’ is more than minor or trivial, eg it takes
much longer than it usually would to complete a daily
task like getting dressed
– ‘long-term’ means 12 months or more, eg a breathing
condition that develops as a result of a lung infection
@ArchaeoCobb
13. Digging Diversity 2: Disability
Do you have a disability?
Professionals Students
@ArchaeoCobb
No, 90%
Yes, 10%
No, 76%
Yes, 24%
16. Digging Diversity 2: Disability
Do you have a physical or mental condition that
you do not define as a disability using the
definition above but that may affect you on a
recurring or fluctuating basis?
@ArchaeoCobb
17. Digging Diversity 2: Disability
Do you have a physical or mental condition that
you do not define as a disability using the
definition above but that may affect you on a
recurring or fluctuating basis?
Professionals Students
@ArchaeoCobb
No, 57%
Yes, 43%
No, 68%
Yes, 32%
20. Mental Health
Professionals
• 1.2% of professionals in the
study reporting a mental
health issue as a disability
• 12.3% of professionals in
the study reporting a
mental health issue as a
recurring or fluctuating
condition
Students
• 4.1% of students in the
study reporting a mental
health issue as a disability
• 6.1% students in the study
reporting a mental health
issue as a recurring or
fluctuating condition
@ArchaeoCobb
22. Mental Health and Employment Status
Professionals with a mental
health issue
• Average (mean) Wage
£25,335
• 17% Self employed
• 17% Part Time
• 28% Temporary
• 17% in managerial positions
• 20% With children
• 10% With other care
responsibilities
Professionals without a mental
health issue
• Average (mean) Wage
£40,284
• 13% Self employed
• 16.5% Part Time
• 18% Temporary
• 34% in managerial positions
• 33% With children
• 9% With other care
responsibilities
@ArchaeoCobb
23. Mental Health and Employment Status
Professionals with a mental
health issue
Professionals without a mental
health issue
@ArchaeoCobb
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Museum
freelance
Third Sector
National Government
Local Authority
Academia
Private Sector/Commercial
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Freelance
Museum
National Government
Third Sector
Local Authority
Academia
Private Sector/Commercial
24. Mental Health and Age
Professionals with a mental
health issue
Professionals without a mental
health issue
@ArchaeoCobb
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70 or above
25. Mental Health and Personal Identity
Professionals with a mental
health issue
• 3% Identifying with a non
binary or transgender
identity
• Greater diversity in sexuality
Professionals without a mental
health issue
• 0.4% Identifying with a non
binary or transgender
gender identity
• Predominantly heterosexual
@ArchaeoCobb
Homosexual,
5%
Bisexual, 23%
Heterosexual,
71%
Homosexual,
5%
Bisexual, 6%
Heterosexual,
90%
26. Mental Health and other conditions
Professionals
• 23 of the 102 (22.5%) of
professionals in the study
reporting a mental health
issue as a disability OR as a
recurring or fluctuating
condition, had another
disability or recurring or
fluctuating condition
Students
• 11 of the 26 (42.3%) of
students in the study
reporting a mental health
issue as a disability OR as a
recurring or fluctuating
condition, had another
disability or recurring or
fluctuating condition
@ArchaeoCobb
27. “I have chronic pain from several joint fractures,
exacerbated by working in archaeology. I suffer
from recurrent debilitating migraines. I struggle
with depression. But, aside from a diagnosis and
brief course of treatment over 10 years ago, I
have never told anybody. Not even my partner
who also has health issues, and we're both
working multiple roles to pay the bills. I can't
afford to be ill. I can't afford to acknowledge the
problem.”
@ArchaeoCobb
28. Mental Health in Archaeology:
A Summary
People with a Mental Health Condition in
Archaeology are more likely to…
• Be in junior and lower paid posts
• Have insecure employment status
• Be between 25 and 39 (but in all age categories)
• More likely to identify with a non-binary gender
and sexuality
• 1 in 5 will have another condition
@ArchaeoCobb
29. MIND’s guidance for promoting mental
wellbeing in the workplace
• Five ways to wellbeing: Connect, be active, take notice,
learn, give
• Top tips for wellbeing at work: Reclaim your lunch
break, organise a picnic, hold a group activity, take up a
challenge, whistle while you work
• Getting the work-life balance right: make overtime the
exception not the norm, create clear boundaries
between work and home, start a to do list, wind down
on the commute home, ask for help
• Wellness Action Plans – for all employees, not just
those with Mental Health issues
@ArchaeoCobb
30. What archaeological workplaces can
do
• Breakdown the taboos around mental health!
Talk about it!
• Mental health first aid
• Mental health awareness training
• Wellness Action Plans
• Mentoring
• Take your own workplace diversity surveys
@ArchaeoCobb
31. • Changes within CIfA’s own practice (code of conduct, group constitutions),
contributed to CIfA Ethics practice paper, statements on conference
accessibility and panel guidance
• Connecting with other bodies e.g. Prospect and RICs - training and insights
• Mental Health first aid workshop(s)
• Unconscious Bias training
• Other CPD sessions to support good practice in Equality and Diversity
• Conference sessions and individual contributions
• Developing accessibility guidance for hard copy and online documentation
• Working Party developing CIfA guidance for disabled employees.
• Representing different voices - guest blogs on our website.
• Website as a hub of information
• Supporting the TrowelBlazers Raising Horizons exhibition.
Introduce self! – CIfA E&D group chair
KEY POINT: To improve disciplinary well being, we first have to understand the make up of our profession, especially key areas of diversity – and we need to think about their implications in critical terms
So let’s review the ptp stats
In 2013 CIfA’s labour market study, Profiling the Profession, reported that 98.2% of archaeologists are not disabled (Aitchison and Rocks-Macqueen 2013: 99). In this paper I want to consider how accurate this figure is by exploring the extent of unseen disabilities and other unseen conditions within the profession today. At the heart of my paper will be the results of an online survey which I will be disseminating across the profession in the months leading up to TAG. To develop and theorise well-being in archaeology, I argue that we first have to understand the full extent of conditions that are normally unseen in labour market studies, and often unseen in the workplace too. These include mental health issues, dyslexia, dyspraxia, endometriosis and epilepsy, to name but a few. All are complicated by the fact that some may self-identify these unseen conditions as disabilities, some may not, but however they are identified, keeping quiet about any or all can have a detrimental effect upon well-being. I suggest that we need an open and honest dialogue, beginning by understanding if and why these may be under-reported, in order to challenge the stigma around many of these unseen conditions, to theorise health and well-being in contemporary practice and to enhance disciplinary well-being.
H
And if we look at PtP’s other diversity statistics we can see, as a discipline how limited our disciplinary diversity really is.
Identified by top down so unseen disabilities, people of mixed ethnicities, and non binary gender identities – all things that people may not ness report to their employer, are not represented.
So to address this I started Digging Diversity
Explain DD1 (READ SLIDE) then say…
So I want to see how things have changed – indeed if they have – in this 6 years fees have risen for students, but the sector has more jobs so more employees – this is a good time to see if there have been any changes
So this autumn I undertook DD2 – READ SLIDE
There is much to explore, but in this paper I want to talk about a specific area of new data in this study that DD1 didn’t cover – Unseen disabilities.
But before I get into the data I need to express some caveats with the data….
763 professionals of an Estimated current workforce 6253 (Aitchison 2017, 5) = 12.2%
https://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/Archaeological%20Market%20Survey%202016-17%20101117.pdf
HC
Equally we can see that where participants had the opportunity to state their disability (PtP data is completed by employers, so employees may not be willing to disclose disabilities) a very diverse range emerge
But what is striking, and key to what we wish to discuss today, is that the Digging Diversity pilot study found that diversity in students was much higher than those in professionals, both in terms of gender, sexuality, ethnicity and disability
So the picture is more complicated than just those that labour market stats allow and crucially…
Explain DD1 (READ SLIDE) then say…
So I want to see how things have changed – indeed if they have – in this 6 years fees have risen for students, but the sector has more jobs so more employees – this is a good time to see if there have been any changes
So this autumn I undertook DD2 – READ SLIDE
There is much to explore, but in this paper I want to talk about a specific area of new data in this study that DD1 didn’t cover – Unseen disabilities.
But before I get into the data I need to express some caveats with the data….
763 professionals of an Estimated current workforce 6253 (Aitchison 2017, 5) = 12.2%
https://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/Archaeological%20Market%20Survey%202016-17%20101117.pdf
Explain DD1 (READ SLIDE) then say…
So I want to see how things have changed – indeed if they have – in this 6 years fees have risen for students, but the sector has more jobs so more employees – this is a good time to see if there have been any changes
So this autumn I undertook DD2 – READ SLIDE
There is much to explore, but in this paper I want to talk about a specific area of new data in this study that DD1 didn’t cover – Unseen disabilities.
But before I get into the data I need to express some caveats with the data….
763 professionals of an Estimated current workforce 6253 (Aitchison 2017, 5) = 12.2%
https://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/Archaeological%20Market%20Survey%202016-17%20101117.pdf
Do you have a disability? A disability is defined by the Equality Act 2010 as a physical or mental impairment that has a ‘substantial’ and ‘long-term’ negative effect on your ability to do normal daily activities. substantial’ is more than minor or trivial, eg it takes much longer than it usually would to complete a daily task like getting dressed
‘long-term’ means 12 months or more, eg a breathing condition that develops as a result of a lung infection
So, rather like DD1, I found that more students had a disability than professionals – although unlike DD1…
I found that pros had a diverse range of disabilities as did students
In dd1 students had more diverse a range of disabilities
But just like last time I asked this I noticed a key trend…
(56 different disabilities noted)
V few people identified with mental health issues.
I find this survprising. I see students and I talk to my colleagues – mental health issues are so prevalent – but in a question that uses the equality act definition very few people stated they had them.
So, I asked another question:
Do you have a physical or mental condition that you do not define as a disability using the definition above but that may affect you on a recurring or fluctuating basis?
Here the results get really interesting…
So, I asked another question:
Do you have a physical or mental condition that you do not define as a disability using the definition above but that may affect you on a recurring or fluctuating basis?
Here the results get really interesting…
75 different conditions noted
75 different conditions noted
So let’s just take a moment to digest what this means….
PtP shows that employers are only aware of 1.8% of their staff being disabled. In reality there are a great deal more but also there are people with recurring or fluctuating conditions that don’t fit the equality act def but that are none the less fundamentally disabling – and often hidden. In the case of mental health then, the national av is that 1 in 4 people will experience a mental health issue, and Mind’s research shows that 1 in 6 workers will have a mental health issue and here there is c. 1 in 7 for professionals.
It’s a high number. Too high, I think, to simply overlook. Instead I want to understand this a bit better, and interrogating the dd2 data gives us a better picture….
Actual numbers
Professionals
(9) 1.2% of professionals in the study reporting a mental health issue as a disability
(94) 12.3% of professionals in the study reporting a mental health issue as a recurring or fluctuating condition
Students
(12) 4.1% of students in the study reporting a mental health issue as a disability
(18) 6.1% students in the study reporting a mental health issue as a recurring or fluctuating condition
So let’s start with the employment picture:
DD2 shows that People with a mental health issue are more likely to be paid less, and not to be in managerial positions, to be self employed, to be on temporary contracts
All the obvious stuff – more likely to be junior, in insecure job positions, and struggling with money
And a final and crucial point to make here is that, for a lot of these people in the study, mental health issues did not exist in isolation – over a fifth of professionals and close to half of students had another condition.
The study doesn’t tell me, of course, whether these are linked, but it is well accepted that some conditions
102 pros in the study – note one person put yes in both columns
26 Students – 4 put yes in both columns
READ SLIDE
So, you’re probably thinking, so what? Isn’t this a tautiology? Doesn’t DD just prove what we know from other studies outsode of archaeplogy, and isn’t it obvious that people with less job security, who are affected by another disability or recurring or fluctuating condition, and who are fighting normative structures of society in other areas of their life are going to struggle with their mental health.
Yes, yes it is – but if it’s so obvious, and mental health issues are so prevalent, then shouldn’t we be taking it seriously at a disciplinary level?
And if we’re going to take it seriously, what does that mean?
Equally there is action we can take at a professional level
Recent formation of the E&D group and we are working hard to break down taboos around MH and support colleagues in taking action in workplaces
If you have any suggestions or questions do contact us – email address shortly
So, to conclude – I’ve shown here that there are some