Cloning Humans Essay

Is Human Cloning Ethical?
Is Human Cloning Ethical?
Imagine that you have just been diagnosed with lung cancer. You have been told you have six
months to live unless you can find two replacement lungs. But, you are told and realize you are a
clone and have to give your life to save another. Is that ethically right? Would you, the original human
want to do it? I feel that cloning human beings is ethically and morally wrong. Cloning seems to be
a big issue in the world today. The issues of cloning became a reality in 1997. On February 27,
1997, it was reported that scientist produced the first clone of an adult sheep, attracting international
attention and raising questions of whether cloning should take place. Within days, the...show more
content...
The third is it impacts on societal relations. The fourth and final is the potential effects on the human
gene pool. The Americans and cloning experts just don't know the harms that will come from cloning.
Some people say limit cloning of humans to just research or for medical reasons, but it's the same
thing. Producing clones for research or to use their parts is unethical. Cloning for just medical
research is still harming another human being to save another. That is wrong in my mind,
ethically and morally. Its ethically wrong because I fell that a humans morals aren't to kill other
human for body parts. It's morally wrong because it's not the right conduct of a human to do such
a thing. Even if cloning is limited to medical research, there is still the risk of cloning humans. We
simply cannot play God and create life because it is ethically wrong and sinful, and most
importantly, dangerous. It would be against the code of ethics of a doctor to harm a clone.
Harming a clone would be such using one of its organs to save the original life. The question shakes
us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question
the very concepts of right and wrong that makes them all human. The cloning of any species,
whether they be human or non–human, is ethically wrong. The clone would be a human being and
deserve
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Cloning Essay
Cloning
For many years, the cloning of adults, animals or humans has been mostly the object of science
fiction, something unforeseen by man. However, "The world was shocked in February of 1997
when British scientist, named Ian Wilmot announced that his research team successfully cloned
lamb named dolly from an adult sheep at the Roselyn Institute in Scotland".(1) For what seemed like
a dream for many years quickly turned into reality. The newest and possibly the most controversial
phenomena in curing human disease, a phenomenon better known as cloning, was born.
Through out the history of man, human disease has been considered a leading cause of death. Since
antiquity, physicians explored assorted remedies in order to cure various...show more content...
1995 Ian Wilmut replicates First's experiment with differentiated cells from sheep, but puts embryo
cells into an inactive state before transferring their nuclei to sheep eggs. The eggs develop into
normal lambs. In February 1997 Wilmut and colleagues at the Roslin Institute in Scotland report
they have cloned a 6–year–old adult sheep from an udder cell. They name the sheep Dolly (after
Dolly Parton). It is the first clone created from an adult cell. (4)
Although, many believe cloning to be beneficial to mankind, just like with any new discovery
cloning has become a widely debated controversial topic. In 1978 the release of David Rorvik's
book, In His Image: The Cloning of a Man, sparks a worldwide debate on cloning ethics. (4) Many
would argue that cloning has tremendous positive aspects and would only better our way of life.
While other groups such as naturalists and religious followers, strongly disagree. Those who support
cloning feel that cloning could bring our understanding of evolution and human past to a new
heightened level of understanding. Cloning would also allow for organ transplant without a waiting
list. "Therapeutic cloning [specific cloning technique] and embryonic stem cell research may
represent the best hope for the hundreds of

Human Cloning
Ethical Concerns on Human Cloning Human cloning, one of the most fascinating chapters in
scientific history. Cloning goes back to the first mammal that was successfully cloned, Dolly the
sheep. Dolly was duplicated on July 5, 1996 and since then the world has had many scientific
advancements. Abby Norman, author of "How Close Are We to SuccessfullyCloning our First
Human" said that other types of mammals such as goats, rats, pigs, mice, and rabbits have been
cloned successfully but cloning other mammals and primates may not be so easy. Scientists are
not yet able to successfully clone a human, but believe they will be able to do so by the 2020s.
(Norman) Along with such a controversial topic there comes many who would agree that copying a
human would be beneficial while on the opposing side some would argue that replicating someone's
genes is ethically wrong. Cloning is a very important topic and according to the President's Council
on Bioethics, "The prospect of cloning–to–produce–children, which would be a radically new form
of procreation, raises deep concerns about identity and individuality, the meaning of having children,
the difference between procreation and manufacture, and the relationship between the generations"
("Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry", 2017). Although useful for studying
genetic diseases, human cloning produces issues as to whether it should be allowed or not because
some believe the copy will have the same personality and

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning
Human Cloning comes with two dangerous processes, reproductive cloning (the creating of a new
organism) and the therapeutic cloning (the creation of a new tissues or "other biological products")
which affects the ethics of human society. Scientists perceive cloning benefits all men and women,
while religious leaders stress the idea of cloning to be an unethical process. Although human cloning
serves as an aid to the children and parents with conflicts, cloning is completely unacceptable to
convey human life as a product.
Humans reproductively and therapeutically give the idea of people becoming a product rather than a
living being. Siedler emphasizes that...show more content...
People are born to live individually, free to express their uniqueness, but cloning shatters the
varieties of all human kind and cause the people to serve with purpose; purpose to be the same
(Siedler 91–92). The differences of every person with their talents or outer appearance "will be
changed, giving them absolutely no individuality or specialness," (Goodnough 45–47).
Scientists guarantee the "good" causes cloning may give to the world, but cloning advocates the
unacceptable idea to the people of this generation. God produced his own place in His own eyes
and the way He wanted His children to become, but cloning destroys everything; destroys the
creation of His own beloved and creates "the danger of playing God," (Goodnough 47). Cloning
illustrates a sign of human going against God and changes the life God provided, which Goodnough
stresses that "humans were given the privilege of finding themselves through what God have given
them, but all will [be erased] with cloning that could go against the gift of God" (47). With such a
simple human cloning process, it can "raise deep concerns [about people's]...most cherished concepts
of faith," (Goodnough 109). A human carry a great amount of power within but is it to the point that
humans could call themselves their own creator? Lisa Yount declares "there is a strong and real
understanding that [humans] are not [their]

Cloning Essay
Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly,
cloning humans has recently become a possibility that seems much more feasible in today's
society. The word clone has been applied to cells as well as to organisms, so that a group of cells
stemming from a single cell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone are identical in
their inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for any differences caused by mutation.
Identical twins, for example, who originate by the division of a single fertilized egg, are members
of a clone; whereas nonidentical twins, who derive from two separate fertilized eggs, are not clones.
(MicrosoftВ® EncartaВ® 97 Encyclopedia). There are two...show more content...
There Dr. Jerry Hall experimented with the possibility of human cloning and began this moral and
ethical debate. There it was concluded that cloning is not something that can be done as of now, but
it is quite a possibility for the future. These scientists experimented eagerly in aims of learning how
to clone humans. Ruth Macklin of U.S. News & World Report writes, "Hall and other
scientists split single humans embryos into identical copies, a technology that opens a Pandora's box
of ethical questions and has sparked a storm of controversy around the world" (http:/
/www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/). They attempted to create seventeen human embryos in a
laboratory dish and when it had grown enough, separated them into forty–eight individual cells. Two
of the separated cells survived for a few days in the lab developed into new human embryos smaller
than the head of a pin and consisting of thirty–two cells each. (http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue
/) Although we cannot clone a human yet, this experiment occurred almost two years ago and
triggered almost an ethical emergency. Evidence from these experiments received strange reactions
from the public. Ruth Macklin states, "Cloning is a radical challenge to the most fundamental
laws of biology, so it's not unreasonable to be concerned that it might threaten human society and
dignity. Yet much of the ethical

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning For the last few decades, cloning was a fictitious idea that lay deep within the pages
of sci–fi novels and movies. The very idea that cloning could one day become reality was thought
to be a scientific impossibility by many experts. But on February 22, 1997, what was thought to
be purely science fiction became reality. That day, a team from the Roslin Institute, led by Dr. Ian
Wilmut, changed the history forever by revealing what looked like an average sheep. And its
name was Dolly. Dolly became one of the most famous if not the most famous sheep in modern
day. She was the first ever clone of a mammal. She was an exact biological carbon copy, a
laboratory counterfeit of her mother. This news shocked the world for...show more content...
Soon after in the mid 1990's, a team from the Roslin Institute, the creators of Dolly, discovered a
new and more efficient method of cloning. A method that was so simple, any in–veto lab could have
done it fifty years ago. This method of cloning was one of great similarity to the procedure
created in the 1950's. An egg cell was taken from the udder of a Finn Dorset ewe and placed in
low concentrate to allow the cell to stop dividing. Then the nucleus of a Black face ewe along
with its DNA was sucked out leaving an empty cell with all the necessary cellular machinery to
successfully produce an embryo. Using the two cells, the cell from the Finn Dorset and the cell
from the Black face, an electric pulse was created by placing them next to one another. Then
another electric pulse was created which mimicked that of the one before it. This summoned the
cells to begin divide. As the cells grew in number, an embryo slowly began to be made and soon
it was ready to be injected back into the body of another sheep (DeMuth 8). Using this same or a
similar procedure, a human clone may one day be born. When Dolly came to existence, people
realized that this breakthrough could be a door to unimaginable technology, not all necessarily
positive. The notion that this discovery could change the world and peoples lives was beginning to
threaten the minds of activists and others. Many of the fears that come with these theories are within

Essay about Human Cloning
Cloning humans has recently become a possibility. It is achieved by the production of a group of
identical cells or organisms that all derive from a single individual (Grolier 220). It is not known
when cloning humans really became a possibility, but it is known that there are two possible ways
that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and
creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves
taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other
individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods almost at our
fingertips, we must ask ourselves two very important questions: Can we do this,...show more
content...
There it was concluded that cloning is not something that can be done as of now, but it is quite a
possibility for the future. These scientists experimented eagerly in aims of learning how to clone
human. Shannon Brownlee of U.S. News & World Report writes, "Hall and other scientists split
single humans embryos into identical copies, a technology that opens a Pandora's box of ethical
questions and has sparked a storm of controversy around the world" (24). They attempted to create
seventeen human embryos in a laboratory dish and when it had grown enough, separated them into
forty–eight individual cells. Two of the separated cells survived for a few days in the lab developed
into new human embryos smaller than the head of a pin and consisting of thirty–two cells each
(Brownlee 24).
Although we cannot clone a human yet, this experiment occurred almost two years ago and
triggered almost an ethical emergency. Evidence from these experiments got strange reactions from
the public. Shannon Brownlee claims, "The Vatican condemned the technology of this experiment as
being perverse; one German magazine called the research `unscrupulous'" (24). This experiment
opened the possibilities of cloning to society and, even though it was unsuccessful, led people to ask
themselves what they would do if cloning were to happen. Common answers to the puzzling
questions about humans and cloning are still trying to be

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning There are many opinions on the topic of cloning, particularly on the controversy of
human cloning. Lots of people have many fears over if we should continue this form of study,
whereas others think that this technology should be pushed forward with high hopes. However, no
side should rule out the other, but instead, should compliment one another. Both arguments should
be heard and acknowledged before any decision is made towards this new area of study. For
example, many people think that their fears are unanswerable and should cause the absolute ban on
cloning.
Although many scientists are in the field of cloning, many other people have scientific reasons why
this shouldn't happen. One reason is that if a human clone...show more content...
Another concern with Dolly was that the clone was not entirely from one origin. It is now known
that Dolly doesn't carry the entire DNA structure of her 'mother'. The clone could have received
fetal cells, resulting in mixed DNA from a female and male, which means that Dolly was just the
product of an artificial insemination. At this point, many scientists agree that it could have been a
mistake, but other clones have been produced that are true clones, such as: October 3, 1997,
Honolulu, created a mouse clone from cumulus cells surrounding an embryo named Cumulina,
resulting in 50 clones with a success rate of 50:1 by July 1998; cloned monkeys at Oregon, March
1997, with possible success chances with humans; and others that you can find in the news
nowadays. Along with these scientific arguments, many people also have moral issues.
Moral issues play a big part in the ongoing battle over cloning. Under some main religions,
arguments rise that the creation of life is against the will of 'God', and that humans shouldn't have
this power because it's unnatural, and it shouldn't be abused. However, some cloning scientists
counter that in some religious texts, human is portrayed as a sort of co–creator with the 'Supreme'. A
certain group, led by Rael (formerly known as Claude Vorilhorn and president of "Clonaid"), claim
that he was visited by aliens in 1973 who said they created life by cloning their own DNA and
genetically changing

Cloning Essay
Cloning
For hundreds of years man has wondered what it would be like to clone human beings. With the
idea of cloning comes many different opinions and positions. The idea of creating an army of
"super humans" has long been a dream of many people. Others have feared what would happen to
the world if cloning were possible and if cloning is morally correct. Overall, religion and ethics
play a vital role in the both of these viewpoints and greatly effect many positions on the topic of
cloning. In February of 1997 Dr. Ian Wilmut, a 52–year–old embryologist at the Roslin Institute in
dinburgh announced the cloning of a lamb named Dolly 1. He had replaced the genetic material of
sheep's egg with the DNA...show more content...
Many individuals also stated that now that the technology is available, its use is inevitable.
Randolfe Wicker, a New York businessperson, founded the Clone Rights United Front after reports
of the successful cloning. His goals are to continue to push for more research and to defend
people's rights.3 These examples show the rights of the individual, but ironically many people who
fight for the rights of individuals, form groups to do so. In his Tuesday, February 25, 1997 article
'Should We Fear Dolly?' James K. Glassman, a writer for the Washington post discusses his
favorable views on cloning. He points out that cloning is something that could someday be used for
treatment to cure human diseases, and the ability to produce organs for transplanting as benefits for
all of society. Also, he points out that while cloning people is against the law in other countries, it is
not in the United States. He said, "I don't think it should be –– certainly not at this stage . . . Trying
to stop intellectual progress, in any form, is a terrible mistake. Furthermore, the technology is not, in
principle, policeable. In other words, you couldn't really stop research on human cloning if you
wanted to." 4
Most of the scientific community favors the cloning of animals. Many, including Dr. Wilmut, argue
that the potential for medical and

Essay on Human Cloning
Would clones understand themselves as creations or copies? Would cloning undermine the
conception of a human being's individuality? (Medicines' Brave New World) Those are two of the
most questioned aspects of human cloning. Everyone always wants to be their own person and
have their own thought, basically, be as original as they can be. How original can you get when
there's someone out there thinking, doing, and looking exactly like you? Not very original, if you
ask me. Human cloning, cloning of any kind, has been looked at as being creepy, scary, immoral,
and in the most dismal way, exciting. Cloning of humans should be prohibited because it is offensive
to the human life and religion.
In July 2000, Dr. Ian Wilmut, a geneticist of...show more content...
In the past, animal cloning experiments has dealt scientists with grotesque and disastrous
outcomes. The cloned animals had either been born with serious defects and/or deformities. The
main task that needs to be taken care of before the thought human cloning even steps into the
picture is that of dealing with this major setback. It took 277 attempts to produce Dolly, and
apparently Dolly is normal. It's easy to just brush off the fact that a baby lamb was born with
malformations or genetic defects. It's easy to just dump the failed experiment and not worry about
the consequences. How are we to do this if it were done to the human population? What would
happen to the 277 other failed experiments produced before that one success? More than 277
embryos, the start of 277 human beings, would die for the sake of just one embryo that would have
the same DNA as some one else.
Human cloning would be means of degrading the character of the human race. It tests the boundaries
of a humans way of being valuable and unique. Cloning a human would take away a person's identity.
All humans are guaranteed their own personality without barriers. The right to be yourself will be
breached by the fact that everything you thought was yours will be given to back someone else's
genetic identity. It's important to know that personality is not bounded in someone's genes, but that
the

Cloning Humans Essay example
Cloning Humans
Cloning is the process of duplicating a genetically identical organism through non–sexual means.
Cloning can be done with plants animals including human, but it had been success with only plants
and animals not human, since there are some argument going on about is it right or wrong to clone
human (which is actually what this essay is all about). The first cloned mammal is a sheep named
'Dolly' in 1997.The scientists had cloned other animals, such as cows and mice. There are some
discussions about cloning; some people say cloning is dangerous. In my opinion, I think cloning is
'ok' because it will make the huge leap of biological science knowledge and technology, it also
probably...show more content...
(This kind of cloning is called, Therapeutic cloning, and it is legal to do that in UK.) For example,
we can clone our Liver or Kidney for transplants.
Second reason is that we can improve the human race by cloning people those who are intelligent
or athletic in an attempt to produce a "super race" even if it's not the main aiming of the scientific
mainstream though. This kind of cloning will actually produces the genetically identical organism
from its "parent"; this kind of cloning is called 'Reproductive Cloning'. I think this is good because
we might be able to improve our immunity system in the future, so that our clones are immune to
the dangerous diseases and probably all the sickness you can find and we can also avoid defective
genes.
The idea of why I'm actually agreeing with this is because I think in the future we can have our
brain transferred to another body which is our clone – exact copy (or close edited version of our
clone) so that we can live as long as we want, and we can even have a rest (die) for long time (e.g.
100 years) and put our brain back into a clone and continue living. Or using this idea for someone
who is dead with his brain kept safe and 100% perfect and their relative wants that person back for
some reason, doctor can clone the body of the dead person using the genes from the corpse, so

Cloning Humans Essay
Cloning Humans
Ian Wilmut's foray into cloning Dolly has proved to be an appetizing entrГ©e to mankind, with the
next step being the cloning of endangered species, and eventually, humans. Although his team of
researchers had qualified to the public that it is unethical to clone humans1, the very prospect of
being able to replicate creatures of our own kind is nevertheless enticing.
Think of all the possible benefits that make many scientists prepared to cross those ethical
boundaries: Firstly, couples who have tried a long time for identical twins, triplets (or even
quintuplets!) may now be able to have them by producing clones from a single embryonic cell.
Secondly, the cloning of genetically altered cells or...show more content...
Secondly, cloning undermines the need for a reproductive system in some ways, and it will
eventually become redundant. Might we then evolve to become creatures with no reproductive
organs, such as Ape–man had evolved from his crouched body to today's human form? It is hard to
imagine what we will look like in the future. The pleasures of sex and natural birth will also be
greatly compromised! Thirdly, the previously unconceivable notion of not being able to locate the
real criminals with DNA fingerprinting toolkits might one day come true, as there could exist an
increasing number of people with identical genetic fingerprints. Even the introduction of new iris
recognition technology will also be useless since clones have similar irises! Typically, geneticists
have also tried to trace ancestral roots and hence the path of evolution via methods such as
mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosome analysis.3 A possible proliferation of clones in the future
will greatly complicate the work of these geneticists, as there might be cases of multiple possible
mothers and fathers.
A dilemma will also emerge: What type of cells should we clone–mature adult cells or embryonic
cells? Whereas embryonic cells can divide almost indefinitely in cell culture, mature cells can only
divide about 50 times4 in cell culture, which gives a pessimistic amount of nuclei to work with,

Cloning Humans Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Best Online Paper Writing Service

More from Best Online Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Cloning Humans Essay