SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 100
CIV 341
SOIL MECHANICS
Soil Mechanics
•Origin of soil: Rock cycle and origin of soil
/08/10
Rock Cycles
Soils
(Das, 1998)
The final products
due to weathering are
soils
Major soil deposits in India
1. Alluvial deposits
2. Black cotton soils
3. Lateritic soils
4. Desert soils
5. Marine deposits
•Soil Particle size
Based on the size of the particle soil classified into 4 types:
1. Clay: >0.002mm
2. Silt: 0.002mm to 0.075mm
3. Sand: 0.075mm to 4.75mm
4. Gravel: >4.75mm
/08/10
Soil particle size classification
Grain size(mm)
Name of Organization Gravel Sand Silt Clay
MIT classification (Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology) >2 2 to 0.06 0.06 to 0.002 <0.002
US dept. of Agriculture (USDA) >2 2 to 0.05 0.05 to 0.002 <0.002
AASHTO classification 76.2 to 2 2 to 0.075 0.075 to 0.002 <0.002
Unified soil classification system 76.2 to 4.75 4.75 to 0.075 0.075 to 0.002 <0.002
Specific Gravity (G)
• Specific gravity (G) : Ratio of the unit weight of the given material to unit
weight of the water
• Sp. gravity = gs / gw
• Sp. gravity of sandy soil = 2.65 to 2.8
• Sp. gravity of Clay soil = 2.6 to 2.9
•Application: It is required to solve the geotechnical
problems
• Engineering Properties
-Permeability
-Compressibility
-Shear Strength
• Index Properties (indicative of engineering properties)
-Simple tests which are required to determine the index properties are
known as classification tests .
• For coarse grained –
particle size & relative density
• For fine grained—
atterberg’s limits & consistency
Mechanical analysis of soil
• Objective: To determination of the size range of particles present in
a soil
Two methods:
1. Sieve analysis: for particles larger than 0.075mm in diameter
2. Hydrometer analysis: for particles smaller than 0.075mm in
diameter
Sieve Analysis
• Principle: Finding grading of coarse grained soil through the set
of sieves
• Apparatus/Procedure: Sieves sizes
•For Gravel : 80mm,40mm, 20mm,10mm, 4.75mm
•For Sands : 2mm, 1mm, 600m, 425m, 212m, 150m, 75m
• Output result/Application: Percentage finer
Hydrometer Analysis
• Principle: Stokes law: v = (rs-rw),D2/18n
V= particle velocity
• Apparatus/Procedure: Hydrometer placed into cylinder with a liquid
of sodium hexameta phosphate
Output result / Application:
rs = density of solids
rw = density of water
Gs = Sp. Gravity of solids
u= Viscosity of liquids
L = distance
T = time
t
L
wGS
D .
).1(
18
r



Particle size distribution curve
•From graph: Graph analysis
•Effective size: D10
D10 = Particle size such that 10% of the soil is finer than
this size
D60= Particle size such that 60% of the soil is finer than
this size
•Uniform coefficient (Cu): D60/D10
Cu for sands - 6 - called well graded sands
Cu for gravel – 4 – called well graded gravels
•Coefficient of curvature (Cc): (D30)2 / (D60 x D30)
•Cc for well graded soils lies between 1 to 3
• The larger the numerical value of cu the more is the range of
particles.
• Soil with a value of cu less than 2 are uniform soils.
• Soil with a value of cu of 6 or more are well graded
Plastic size distribution curve
Uses of Particle size distribution curve
Usefull for coarse grained soils & fine grained soils
Others:
•1. Classifying the coarse grained soils
•2. Coeff. Permeability will depend on the particle size.
It can determine accurately
•3. useful to design the drainage filters
•4. it provides an index to the shear strength of the soil.
•5. Soil stabilization and pavement design
Particle shape
• 1. Bulky (length,width,thickness of same order of magnitude)
-cohesionless soil
• 2. Flaky
• R.D. of a soil gives idea of the densenss and indicates how it would
behave under loads.
• If the deposit is dense, It can take heavy loads with little
settlement.
Problem1: The results of sieve analysis of a soil are
given below, total massofsample900gm Draw the
particle size distribution curve hence determine the
uniformity coefficient and the Cc
IS Sieve 20m
m
10m
m
4.75mm 2mm 1.0mm 0.6mm 4.25m 212m 150
m
75m pan
Mass of
soil
retaine
d (gm)
35 40 80 150 150 140 115 55 35 25 75
Solution: Calculation for percentage finer N than
different sizes are shown
IS Sieve Mass retained
% retained =
((2)/900)x100
Cumulative %
retained
% finer (N) = 100
- (4)
20mm 35 3.89 3.89 96.11
10mm 40 4.44 8.33 91.67
4.75mm 80 8.89 17.22 82.78
2.0mm 150 16.67 33.89 66.11
1.0mm 150 16.67 50.56 49.44
0.6mm 140 15.56 66.12 33.88
425 115 12.78 78.9 21.1
212m 55 6.11 85.01 14.99
150m 35 3.89 88.9 11.1
75m 25 2.78 91.68 8.32
PAN 75 8.32 100
weight – volume relationships
•Weight- volume relationship:
•Three phase diagram(block diagram): Soil mass consists of 3
constituents
•1. Solids(soil)
•2. Water
•3. Air
•Actually it can’t be segregated, a 3-phase diagram is an artifice
used for easy understanding and convenience for calculations.
•When the soil absolutely dry (no water content) – 2-
phase diagram.
•When the soil fully saturated (no air)- 2 phase diagram.
/08/10
Three Phases in Soils
S : Solid Soil particle
W: Liquid Water (electrolytes)
A: Air Air
Phase diagram
Three Volumetric
Ratios
• (1)Void ratio e (given in decimal, 0.65)
•(2) Porosity n (given in percent 100%)
•(3) Degree of Saturation S (given in percent 100%, 65%)
)V(solidsofVolume
)V(voidsofVolume
e
s
v

)V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal
)V(voidsofVolume
n
t
v

%100
)V(voidsofvolumeTotal
)V(watercontainsvoidsofvolumeTotal
S
v
w

e1
e
)e1(V
eV
n
s
s




Engineering Applications (e)
•Typical values •Engineering applications:
•Volume change tendency
•Strength
(Lambe and Whitman, 1979)
Simple cubic (SC), e = 0.91, Contract
Cubic-tetrahedral (CT), e = 0.65, Dilate
Link: the strength of
rock joint
)itan(strengthShear n 
i
1. Void ratio (e): Volume of voids to the volume of solids.
e = Vv/Vs
Expressed in decimal like 0.4 , 0.5..etc
For coarse grained soil smaller than that for fine grained soils.
Some soils it may have a value even greater than unity.
2. Porosity (n): Volume of voids to the total volume
n = Vv/V
Also called percentage of voids, expressed in percentage,
The porosity of soil cannot exceed 100%
Reason: Vv cannot be greater than V
Both porosity and void ratio are measures of the denseness or
looseness of soil.
As the soil becomes more and more dense, e, n values will decrease
Relationship for ‘e’ and ‘n’:
1/n = V/Vv
1/n = Vs/Vv+Vv/Vv
1/n = e+1
n = e/(1+e),
e = n/(n-1)
3. Degree of saturation (s): Ratio of the volume of water to the
volume of voids.
S = Vw/Vv
 Expressed in percentage (%)
 It is zero when the soil is absolutely dry
 It is 100% when the soil is fully saturated
4. Percentage air voids (na): Ratio of the volume of air to the
total volume.
na = Va/V …….expressed in percentage (%)
5. Air content (ac): Ratio of the volume of air to the volume of
voids.
ac = Va/Vv….expressed in percentage (%)
 Both air content and percentage air voids are zero when the
soil is saturated (Va = 0).
6. Water content (w): Ratio of the weight of water to the weight of solids in a
given soil sample.
w = Ww/Ws
Expressed in percentage (%).
7. Unit weight (g): Weight of soil per unit volume
g = W/V
From the drawing, g = W / V,
g = Ws+Ww/V
g = Ws(1+Ww/Ws)/V
g = Ws(1+w)/V
8. Dry unit weight (gd): gd = Ws/V (Weight of solids per unit volume)
Relationship between moisture content (w, gd and g),
gd = g/(1+w)
Weight Relationships
• (1)Water Content w (100%)
•
• For some organic soils w>100%, up to 500 %
• For quick clays, w>100%
• (2)Density of water (slightly varied with
temperatures)
•(3) Density of soil
•a. Dry density
•b.Total,Wet, or Moist density (0%<S<100%,
Unsaturated)
•c. Saturated density (S=100%,Va =0)
•d. Submerged density (Buoyant density)
%100
)(
)(

s
w
MsolidssoilofMass
MwaterofMass
w
)V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal
)M(solidssoilofMass
t
s
d r
)V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal
)MM(samplesoilofMass
t
ws 
r
)V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal
)MM(watersolidssoilofMass
t
ws
sat

r
wsat
'
rrr
333
w m/Mg1m/kg1000cm/g1 r
Relationship among unit weight, void ratio, moisture content
and sp.gravity
e
wGs
VWsd
e
wGsw
e
wGswwGs
V
WwWs
VW
wGswWswWw
wGsWs












1
.
/
1
.).1(
1
...
/
...
.
g
g
ggg
g
g
g
Considering the volume of soil solids is 1, If the volume of soil solids is 1,
then the volume of voids numerically equal to void ratio, e. The weights of soil
solids and water can be given as
Because the weight for the soil element under consideration is w.Gs.gw, the
volume occupied by water
Gsw
w
wGsw
w
Ww
Vw .
..

g
g
g
Hence from the definition of degree of saturation, S = Vw/Vv = w. Gs/ e
/08/10
• Various unit weight relationships: (Usefull for solveing the problem)
Moist unit weight (g) Dry unit weight(gd) Saturated unit weight(gsat)
wSnnwGs
wnwGs
S
Gsw
wGsw
e
weSGs
e
wGsw
ggg
gg
g
g
g
g
g
g
..)1(.
)1)(1(.
.
1
.).1(
1
)..(
1
.).1(











wnsatd
e
we
satd
nwGsd
e
wGs
d
w
d
ggg
g
gg
gg
g
g
g
g
.
1
.
)1(.
1
.
1








wnGsnsat
e
weGs
sat
gg
g
g
)].).1[(
1
).(




• Problem:1 The mass of a soil sample having a volume of 0.0057m3 is 10.5kg, the
moisture content (w) and the specific gravity of soil solids(Gs) were determined to
be 13% and 2.68, respectively, Determine
a. Moist density, r, b. Dry density, rd, c. Void ratio, e, d. Porosity, n, e. Degree of
saturation, S (%)
Solution: r = M/V, rd = r / (1+w), e = (Gs.gw/rd)-1, n = e/(1+e), S(%) =
(w.Gs/e)x100
Problem. 2, A soil has void ratio = 0.72, moisture content = 12% and Gs= 2.72.
Determine its
(a) Dry unit weight
(b) Moist unit weight, and the
(c) Amount of water to be added per m3 to make it saturated
Problem.3, The dry density of a sand with porosity of 0.387 is 1600 kg/m3. Find
the void ratio of the soil and the specific gravity of the soil solids.
Problem: A moist soil sample weighs 3.52N. After drying in an
oven, its weight is reduced to 2.9N. The specific gravity of solids
and the mass specific gravity are respectively 2.65 and 1.85.
Determine the water content, void ratio and the degree of
saturation. gw = 10kN/m3
Solution: From given data: Weight of water
Water content, w
g = Gm.gw
gd = g/(1+w)
gd = G.gw/(1+e)
n = e / (1+e)
S = w.G/e
Relative density
Application: In granular soils, the degree of compaction in the field can be
measured according to the relative density.
Relative density (Dr) = (emax – e)/(emax – emin)
Expressed in percentage (%)
emax = void ratio of the soil in the loosest state
emin = void ration of the soil in the densest state
e = insitu void ratio of the soil
The term relative density is commonly used to indicate the insitu denseness
or looseness of granular soil
Some values for granular soil
Relative density (%) Description of soil deposit
0 - 15 Very loose
15 - 50 Loose
50 -70 Medium
70 - 85 Dense
85 - 100 Very dense
/08/10
Problem:2- For a given sandy soil, emax = 0.82, emin = 0.42, Gs =
2.66. In the field the soil is compacted to a moist density of 1720 kg/m3
at a moisture content of 9%. Determine the relative density of
compaction.
Solution: Calculate the ‘e’ value
r = (1+w).Gs.rw/(1+e)
Dr = (emax – e) / (emax – emin)
Problem:3 The laboratory test results of a sand are as follows, emax = 0.91,
emin = 0.48, and Gs = 2.67. What would be the dry and moist unit weights of
this sand when compacted at a moisture content of 10% to relative density of
65%? Ans: 16.07kN/m3, 17.68kN/m3
Problem: A fully saturated sample of soil has a volume of 25cc. And a weight 0f
40gm. After drying in the oven, its weight is 28gm. With the help of Phase
diagram, calculate the, 1.Void ratio, 2. Water content 3. Porosity, 4. degree of
saturation 5. Saturated unit weight. (Ans: e= 0.923, w = 42.9%, n = 48%, s
=100%, gsat = 1.6 g/cc
Problem: when a given soil sample of sand was tested in the laboratory, the
void ratio in the loosest and densest possible states were 0.95 and 0.4
respectively . Calculate the 1. Relative density 2. Degree of saturation (Ans:
e=, s = %, Dr = %)
Problem. Tests on fill reveal that one cubic metre of soil on the fill weighs 1624
kgs and after being dried weighs 1.40 tonnes. If the specific gravity of solida
is 2.65, determine w, e, n, s of the soil mass from the first principles.
Consistency of soil – Atterberg Limits
•Liquid limit (LL): It is the moisture where the soil sample starts
behaves like a liquid.
•Plastic limit (PL): It is the moisture where the soil sample starts
behaves like a plastic
•Shrinkage Limit (SL): The moisture content at which the
transaction from solid to semi solid state takes place.
• Plasticity of a soil is its ability to undergo deformation without
cracking or fracturing.
• - due to the presence of clay minerals.
• Plastic soil can be moulded into various shapes when it is wet.
Liquid Limit test
Objective: determination of liquid limit from clay silt
soil
Apparatus: Liquid limit test device, grooving tools
Output: Flow index, IF = (w1 – w2) / log(N2/N1)
w1 = moisture content of soil, in percent, corresponding
to N1 blows
w2 = Moisture content corresponding to N2 blows
Liquid limit test device and grooving tools
Flow curve for liquid limit determination of
clayey siltGraph: X – Number of blows, N
y – Moisture content,w (%)
• Flow index is the rate at which a soil mass loses its shear strength
with an increase in water content.
• -- soil with greater value of flow index has a steeper slope, hence
lower shear strength as compared to flatter.
Plastic Limit Test
Plastic limit: The moisture content in percent at which
the soil crumbles, when rolled into threads of 3.2mm
in diameter.
Test: Determination of plastic limit from the laboratory
Plasticity Index
Plasticity Index: The difference between the Liquid
limit and plastic limit.
PI = LL – PL
When either LL or PL cannot be determined, the soil is non
plastic.
When the plastic limit is greater than Liquid limit, the plasticity
index reported as zero(not negative).
• CI indicates the consistency(firmness) of a soil.
• It shows the nearness of water content of the soil to its plastic limit.
• A soil with CI of zero is at L.L. it is extremely soft and has negligible shear
strength.
• Amount of water in a soil mass depends upon the type of clay
mineral present.
• Activity is a measure of water holding capacity of clayey soil.
• The change in the volume of a clayey soil during swelling or
shrinkage depend upon the activity.
Uses Of Consistency Limits
• L.L. and P.L. depend upon the type and amount of clay in a soil.
However the P.I, depends on the amount of clay.
• The P.I.of a soil is a measure of amount of clay in a soil.
Plasticity chart
/08/10
Soil classification chart
Classification based on Plasticity chart
Silts and clays Liquid limits is 50% or less
ML = Inorganic silts with low plasticity
CL = Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity
OL = Organic silts of low plasticity
Aline , PI = 0.73(LL – 20)
Silts and clays Liquid limits is greater than 50%
MH - Inorganic silts of high plasticity
CH – Inorganic clays of high plasticity
OH – Organic clays of medium plasticity
Pt - Peat or muck or highly organic soils
Problem: The weight of a moist soil sample is 20kg and its volume is 0.011m3.
After drying in an oven, the weight of sample reduces to 16.5kg. Determine
the w, gd, g, e, n, s.
Soil structure
Single grained
Loose state
Dense state
Structure of Sand
Honey combed
Structure of clays
Sediment Structure
Dispersion Nonsalt Flocculation
Salt Flocculation (Na, K )
Engineering classification of soils
AASHTO Classification system:
Soil classified into Seven major groups:
Soil classified under groups A-1, A -2, A -3 are
granular material of which 35% or less of the particles
pass through the no.200(0.075mm) sieve.
Soils of which more than 35% pass through the no.200
sieve are classified under groups
A -4, A – 5, A -6 & A -7
/08/10
AASHTO classification…..
1. Grain size
a. Gravel : Particle passing through 75mm sieve
and retained on the No.10(2mm) US sieve
b. Sand: Particle passing through the no.10(2mm)
and retained on the No.200 (0.075mm) US sieve.
c. Silt and Clay: Particle passing the no.200 US
sieve
2. Plasticity Chart:
Group Index (GI):
Significance: To evaluate the quality of soil as a
highway material.
GI = (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)]+0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10)
Where, F200 = Percentage passing through the No. 200 sieve
LL = liquid limit
PI = Plastic limit
1st term - (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)] – Partial group index
determined from liquid limit
2nd term - 0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10) – Partial group index
determined from plastic limit
Group Index…….
Note: In general the quality performance of soil as a
subgrade material is inversely proportional to the GI
1. If in the equation yields a negative value for GI, it is
taken as 0.
2. The group index calculated is rounded off to the nearest
whole number
3. There is no upper limit for the group index
4. The group index of soils belonging to groups A–1-a, A-
1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5 and A-3 is always zero
Problem 1: The result of the particle size analysis of a soils as
follows:
a. % passing through no.10 sieve = 100
b. % passing through no.40 sieve = 80
c. % passing through no.200 sieve = 58
liquid limit and plasticity index of the minus no.40 fraction of the
soil are 30 and 10 respectively. Calculate the GI
Solution:
GI = (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)]+0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10)
Problem:2, Ninty five percent of a soil passes through the no.200
sieve and has a liquid limit of 60 and plasticity index of 40.
Calculate th GI.
Solution:
GI = (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)]+0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10)
Unified Soil Classification System
Main points:
1. The classification is based on material passing a 75m
sieve.
2. Coarse fraction = percent retained above no.200 sieve =
100 – F200 = R200
3. Fine fraction = percent passing no. 200 sieve = F200
4. Gravel fraction = percent retained above no.4 sieve = R4
/08/10
Classification
•As per USCS soil divided into groups
1. Coarse grained: Gravel or sand in nature with less
than 50% passing through the no.200 sieve.
- It represents clear symbols – G (Gravel), S
(sand)
2. Fine grained soils: Soils with 50% or more passing
through the no.200 sieve.
- The group symbols starts with ‘M’(inorganic silts)
- ‘C’for inorganic clays, ‘o’organic clays or silts
- ‘Pt’used for peat, muck and other highly organic
soils
Other symbols used for the classification:
W – well graded
P - poorly graded
L – Low plasticity (LL is less than 50%)
H – High plasticity (LL more than 50%)
Engineering classification of soil
Engineering classification of soil
AASHTO / USCS classification
1. Both systems are divide the soil into two major groups,
that is coarse and fine grained soils as separated by sieve
no . 200 (75m)
2. a. According to the AASTHO system a soil is considered
fine grained when more than 35% passes through the
no.200 sieve
b. USCS more than 50% passes through the no.200
sieve.
3. a. USCS Gravelly and sandy soils clearly separated,
b. AASHTO it is A-2
4. Clear symbols used in USCS (GW, SM, CH) , but in A
in AASHTO classification
5. a. AASHTO system, the no.10 sieve is used to separate gravel
from sand.
b. USCS no. 4 sieve is used, upper limits appropriate concrete
and highway technology using no. 10(2mm) sieve.
6. a. USCS clearly organic soil classification (OL, OH, Pt) are
given,
b. in AASHTO there is no classification for organic soils

More Related Content

What's hot

SOIL PERMEABILITY PPT
SOIL PERMEABILITY PPTSOIL PERMEABILITY PPT
SOIL PERMEABILITY PPTJISMI JACOB
 
Question bank of soil mechanics
Question bank of soil mechanicsQuestion bank of soil mechanics
Question bank of soil mechanicsPrashantha Tr
 
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORYTERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORYSANJEEV Wazir
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]Muhammad Irfan
 
Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve & Hydrometer AnalysisSieve & Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve & Hydrometer Analysisİbrahim AYHAN
 
Class 5 Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 5   Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 5   Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 5 Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Hossam Shafiq I
 
Shear Strength of Soil
Shear Strength of SoilShear Strength of Soil
Shear Strength of SoilUmang Parmar
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]Muhammad Irfan
 
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240Wajahat Ullah
 
Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)
Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)
Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)Suman Chapagain
 
Presentation 7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEng
Presentation  7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEngPresentation  7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEng
Presentation 7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEngWorld University of Bangladesh
 
Permeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head Method
Permeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head MethodPermeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head Method
Permeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head MethodJameel Academy
 
California bearingratio test
California bearingratio testCalifornia bearingratio test
California bearingratio testAsok999
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]Muhammad Irfan
 
300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering
300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering
300 solved problems in geotechnical engineeringBahzad5
 
Compaction tests
Compaction testsCompaction tests
Compaction testsAmi jasani
 
Setting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel Academy
Setting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel AcademySetting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel Academy
Setting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel AcademyJameel Academy
 

What's hot (20)

SOIL PERMEABILITY PPT
SOIL PERMEABILITY PPTSOIL PERMEABILITY PPT
SOIL PERMEABILITY PPT
 
Question bank of soil mechanics
Question bank of soil mechanicsQuestion bank of soil mechanics
Question bank of soil mechanics
 
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORYTERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
 
Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve & Hydrometer AnalysisSieve & Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis
 
Atterberg Limit Test
Atterberg Limit Test  Atterberg Limit Test
Atterberg Limit Test
 
Drainage design
Drainage designDrainage design
Drainage design
 
Class 5 Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 5   Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 5   Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 5 Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Shear Strength of Soil
Shear Strength of SoilShear Strength of Soil
Shear Strength of Soil
 
Index properties
Index propertiesIndex properties
Index properties
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
 
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
 
Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)
Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)
Presentation on khosla's theory (Numerical Example)
 
Presentation 7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEng
Presentation  7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEngPresentation  7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEng
Presentation 7 a ce 904 Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan Saha, PEng
 
Permeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head Method
Permeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head MethodPermeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head Method
Permeability Test of soil Using Constant and Falling Head Method
 
California bearingratio test
California bearingratio testCalifornia bearingratio test
California bearingratio test
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #8: Hydrometer Analysis]
 
300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering
300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering
300 solved problems in geotechnical engineering
 
Compaction tests
Compaction testsCompaction tests
Compaction tests
 
Setting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel Academy
Setting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel AcademySetting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel Academy
Setting Time of Hydraulic Cement By Vicat Needle | Jameel Academy
 

Similar to Soil Mechanics

Mekanika Tanah - Sieve Analysis
Mekanika Tanah - Sieve AnalysisMekanika Tanah - Sieve Analysis
Mekanika Tanah - Sieve AnalysisReski Aprilia
 
soil classification lab
soil classification labsoil classification lab
soil classification labahmed fouad
 
Concrete lab s5 procedure
Concrete lab s5 procedureConcrete lab s5 procedure
Concrete lab s5 procedureSHAMJITH KM
 
Constrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. ppt
Constrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. pptConstrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. ppt
Constrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. pptShobbbe
 
Basicsofsoilmechanics
Basicsofsoilmechanics Basicsofsoilmechanics
Basicsofsoilmechanics Dr. N. Nalanth
 
Particle Size Distribution & Classification of Soil
Particle Size Distribution & Classification of SoilParticle Size Distribution & Classification of Soil
Particle Size Distribution & Classification of Soilwasim shaikh
 
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical RerviewPe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerviewimedlachheb
 
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussainGeo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussainsajid hussain
 
Sieve Analysis
Sieve AnalysisSieve Analysis
Sieve AnalysisBahzad5
 
Soil stabalisation ppt
Soil stabalisation pptSoil stabalisation ppt
Soil stabalisation pptAbdulAhad334
 

Similar to Soil Mechanics (20)

Mekanika Tanah - Sieve Analysis
Mekanika Tanah - Sieve AnalysisMekanika Tanah - Sieve Analysis
Mekanika Tanah - Sieve Analysis
 
Unit 1 PPT.pptx
Unit 1 PPT.pptxUnit 1 PPT.pptx
Unit 1 PPT.pptx
 
soil classification lab
soil classification labsoil classification lab
soil classification lab
 
Concrete lab s5
Concrete lab s5Concrete lab s5
Concrete lab s5
 
Concrete lab s5 procedure
Concrete lab s5 procedureConcrete lab s5 procedure
Concrete lab s5 procedure
 
Sm & concrete
Sm & concreteSm & concrete
Sm & concrete
 
Amir tantrayz
Amir tantrayzAmir tantrayz
Amir tantrayz
 
Basics of soil mechanics
Basics of soil mechanics   Basics of soil mechanics
Basics of soil mechanics
 
GE Lab manual.pdf
GE Lab manual.pdfGE Lab manual.pdf
GE Lab manual.pdf
 
Constrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. ppt
Constrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. pptConstrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. ppt
Constrn &amp; mat'l summer lec. ppt
 
Basicsofsoilmechanics
Basicsofsoilmechanics Basicsofsoilmechanics
Basicsofsoilmechanics
 
5 soil compaction
5 soil compaction5 soil compaction
5 soil compaction
 
Introducation to soil
Introducation to soilIntroducation to soil
Introducation to soil
 
Particle Size Distribution & Classification of Soil
Particle Size Distribution & Classification of SoilParticle Size Distribution & Classification of Soil
Particle Size Distribution & Classification of Soil
 
Sieve analysis for Soil
Sieve analysis for SoilSieve analysis for Soil
Sieve analysis for Soil
 
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical RerviewPe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
 
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussainGeo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
 
Sieve Analysis
Sieve AnalysisSieve Analysis
Sieve Analysis
 
Properties of Sand
Properties of SandProperties of Sand
Properties of Sand
 
Soil stabalisation ppt
Soil stabalisation pptSoil stabalisation ppt
Soil stabalisation ppt
 

More from Dhrubajyoti Majumdar

Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,
Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,
Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,Dhrubajyoti Majumdar
 
Maintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roads
Maintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roadsMaintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roads
Maintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roadsDhrubajyoti Majumdar
 
Ceramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcement
Ceramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcementCeramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcement
Ceramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcementDhrubajyoti Majumdar
 

More from Dhrubajyoti Majumdar (6)

Road equipments
Road equipmentsRoad equipments
Road equipments
 
Highway planning
Highway planningHighway planning
Highway planning
 
Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,
Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,
Special problems and maintenance in hill roads,
 
Maintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roads
Maintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roadsMaintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roads
Maintenance of unsurfaced roads, wbm roads
 
Types of curve in hill road
Types of curve in hill roadTypes of curve in hill road
Types of curve in hill road
 
Ceramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcement
Ceramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcementCeramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcement
Ceramic coating and frp coating on pavement reinforcement
 

Recently uploaded

Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxIntroduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxk795866
 
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...asadnawaz62
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxbritheesh05
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024hassan khalil
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxwendy cai
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile servicerehmti665
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...Soham Mondal
 
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024Mark Billinghurst
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube ExchangerStudy on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube ExchangerAnamika Sarkar
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidNikhilNagaraju
 
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCLCurrent Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCLDeelipZope
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSCAESB
 
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.eptoze12
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIabhishek36461
 

Recently uploaded (20)

POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes examples
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes  examplesPOWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes  examples
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes examples
 
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxIntroduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
 
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
 
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Serviceyoung call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
 
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
 
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
IVE Industry Focused Event - Defence Sector 2024
 
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptxExploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
 
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube ExchangerStudy on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
Study on Air-Water & Water-Water Heat Exchange in a Finned Tube Exchanger
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
 
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCLCurrent Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
 
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
 

Soil Mechanics

  • 2. Soil Mechanics •Origin of soil: Rock cycle and origin of soil /08/10
  • 3. Rock Cycles Soils (Das, 1998) The final products due to weathering are soils
  • 4. Major soil deposits in India 1. Alluvial deposits 2. Black cotton soils 3. Lateritic soils 4. Desert soils 5. Marine deposits
  • 5.
  • 6. •Soil Particle size Based on the size of the particle soil classified into 4 types: 1. Clay: >0.002mm 2. Silt: 0.002mm to 0.075mm 3. Sand: 0.075mm to 4.75mm 4. Gravel: >4.75mm /08/10
  • 7. Soil particle size classification Grain size(mm) Name of Organization Gravel Sand Silt Clay MIT classification (Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology) >2 2 to 0.06 0.06 to 0.002 <0.002 US dept. of Agriculture (USDA) >2 2 to 0.05 0.05 to 0.002 <0.002 AASHTO classification 76.2 to 2 2 to 0.075 0.075 to 0.002 <0.002 Unified soil classification system 76.2 to 4.75 4.75 to 0.075 0.075 to 0.002 <0.002
  • 8. Specific Gravity (G) • Specific gravity (G) : Ratio of the unit weight of the given material to unit weight of the water • Sp. gravity = gs / gw • Sp. gravity of sandy soil = 2.65 to 2.8 • Sp. gravity of Clay soil = 2.6 to 2.9 •Application: It is required to solve the geotechnical problems
  • 9. • Engineering Properties -Permeability -Compressibility -Shear Strength • Index Properties (indicative of engineering properties) -Simple tests which are required to determine the index properties are known as classification tests .
  • 10. • For coarse grained – particle size & relative density • For fine grained— atterberg’s limits & consistency
  • 11. Mechanical analysis of soil • Objective: To determination of the size range of particles present in a soil Two methods: 1. Sieve analysis: for particles larger than 0.075mm in diameter 2. Hydrometer analysis: for particles smaller than 0.075mm in diameter
  • 12. Sieve Analysis • Principle: Finding grading of coarse grained soil through the set of sieves • Apparatus/Procedure: Sieves sizes •For Gravel : 80mm,40mm, 20mm,10mm, 4.75mm •For Sands : 2mm, 1mm, 600m, 425m, 212m, 150m, 75m • Output result/Application: Percentage finer
  • 13.
  • 14. Hydrometer Analysis • Principle: Stokes law: v = (rs-rw),D2/18n V= particle velocity • Apparatus/Procedure: Hydrometer placed into cylinder with a liquid of sodium hexameta phosphate Output result / Application: rs = density of solids rw = density of water Gs = Sp. Gravity of solids u= Viscosity of liquids L = distance T = time t L wGS D . ).1( 18 r   
  • 15. Particle size distribution curve •From graph: Graph analysis •Effective size: D10 D10 = Particle size such that 10% of the soil is finer than this size D60= Particle size such that 60% of the soil is finer than this size •Uniform coefficient (Cu): D60/D10 Cu for sands - 6 - called well graded sands Cu for gravel – 4 – called well graded gravels •Coefficient of curvature (Cc): (D30)2 / (D60 x D30) •Cc for well graded soils lies between 1 to 3
  • 16. • The larger the numerical value of cu the more is the range of particles. • Soil with a value of cu less than 2 are uniform soils. • Soil with a value of cu of 6 or more are well graded
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24. Uses of Particle size distribution curve Usefull for coarse grained soils & fine grained soils Others: •1. Classifying the coarse grained soils •2. Coeff. Permeability will depend on the particle size. It can determine accurately •3. useful to design the drainage filters •4. it provides an index to the shear strength of the soil. •5. Soil stabilization and pavement design
  • 25. Particle shape • 1. Bulky (length,width,thickness of same order of magnitude) -cohesionless soil • 2. Flaky
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28. • R.D. of a soil gives idea of the densenss and indicates how it would behave under loads. • If the deposit is dense, It can take heavy loads with little settlement.
  • 29. Problem1: The results of sieve analysis of a soil are given below, total massofsample900gm Draw the particle size distribution curve hence determine the uniformity coefficient and the Cc IS Sieve 20m m 10m m 4.75mm 2mm 1.0mm 0.6mm 4.25m 212m 150 m 75m pan Mass of soil retaine d (gm) 35 40 80 150 150 140 115 55 35 25 75
  • 30. Solution: Calculation for percentage finer N than different sizes are shown IS Sieve Mass retained % retained = ((2)/900)x100 Cumulative % retained % finer (N) = 100 - (4) 20mm 35 3.89 3.89 96.11 10mm 40 4.44 8.33 91.67 4.75mm 80 8.89 17.22 82.78 2.0mm 150 16.67 33.89 66.11 1.0mm 150 16.67 50.56 49.44 0.6mm 140 15.56 66.12 33.88 425 115 12.78 78.9 21.1 212m 55 6.11 85.01 14.99 150m 35 3.89 88.9 11.1 75m 25 2.78 91.68 8.32 PAN 75 8.32 100
  • 31. weight – volume relationships •Weight- volume relationship: •Three phase diagram(block diagram): Soil mass consists of 3 constituents •1. Solids(soil) •2. Water •3. Air •Actually it can’t be segregated, a 3-phase diagram is an artifice used for easy understanding and convenience for calculations. •When the soil absolutely dry (no water content) – 2- phase diagram. •When the soil fully saturated (no air)- 2 phase diagram. /08/10
  • 32. Three Phases in Soils S : Solid Soil particle W: Liquid Water (electrolytes) A: Air Air
  • 34. Three Volumetric Ratios • (1)Void ratio e (given in decimal, 0.65) •(2) Porosity n (given in percent 100%) •(3) Degree of Saturation S (given in percent 100%, 65%) )V(solidsofVolume )V(voidsofVolume e s v  )V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal )V(voidsofVolume n t v  %100 )V(voidsofvolumeTotal )V(watercontainsvoidsofvolumeTotal S v w  e1 e )e1(V eV n s s    
  • 35. Engineering Applications (e) •Typical values •Engineering applications: •Volume change tendency •Strength (Lambe and Whitman, 1979) Simple cubic (SC), e = 0.91, Contract Cubic-tetrahedral (CT), e = 0.65, Dilate Link: the strength of rock joint )itan(strengthShear n  i
  • 36. 1. Void ratio (e): Volume of voids to the volume of solids. e = Vv/Vs Expressed in decimal like 0.4 , 0.5..etc For coarse grained soil smaller than that for fine grained soils. Some soils it may have a value even greater than unity. 2. Porosity (n): Volume of voids to the total volume n = Vv/V Also called percentage of voids, expressed in percentage, The porosity of soil cannot exceed 100% Reason: Vv cannot be greater than V Both porosity and void ratio are measures of the denseness or looseness of soil. As the soil becomes more and more dense, e, n values will decrease
  • 37. Relationship for ‘e’ and ‘n’: 1/n = V/Vv 1/n = Vs/Vv+Vv/Vv 1/n = e+1 n = e/(1+e), e = n/(n-1) 3. Degree of saturation (s): Ratio of the volume of water to the volume of voids. S = Vw/Vv  Expressed in percentage (%)  It is zero when the soil is absolutely dry  It is 100% when the soil is fully saturated
  • 38. 4. Percentage air voids (na): Ratio of the volume of air to the total volume. na = Va/V …….expressed in percentage (%) 5. Air content (ac): Ratio of the volume of air to the volume of voids. ac = Va/Vv….expressed in percentage (%)  Both air content and percentage air voids are zero when the soil is saturated (Va = 0).
  • 39. 6. Water content (w): Ratio of the weight of water to the weight of solids in a given soil sample. w = Ww/Ws Expressed in percentage (%). 7. Unit weight (g): Weight of soil per unit volume g = W/V From the drawing, g = W / V, g = Ws+Ww/V g = Ws(1+Ww/Ws)/V g = Ws(1+w)/V 8. Dry unit weight (gd): gd = Ws/V (Weight of solids per unit volume) Relationship between moisture content (w, gd and g), gd = g/(1+w)
  • 40. Weight Relationships • (1)Water Content w (100%) • • For some organic soils w>100%, up to 500 % • For quick clays, w>100% • (2)Density of water (slightly varied with temperatures) •(3) Density of soil •a. Dry density •b.Total,Wet, or Moist density (0%<S<100%, Unsaturated) •c. Saturated density (S=100%,Va =0) •d. Submerged density (Buoyant density) %100 )( )(  s w MsolidssoilofMass MwaterofMass w )V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal )M(solidssoilofMass t s d r )V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal )MM(samplesoilofMass t ws  r )V(samplesoilofvolumeTotal )MM(watersolidssoilofMass t ws sat  r wsat ' rrr 333 w m/Mg1m/kg1000cm/g1 r
  • 41. Relationship among unit weight, void ratio, moisture content and sp.gravity e wGs VWsd e wGsw e wGswwGs V WwWs VW wGswWswWw wGsWs             1 . / 1 .).1( 1 ... / ... . g g ggg g g g Considering the volume of soil solids is 1, If the volume of soil solids is 1, then the volume of voids numerically equal to void ratio, e. The weights of soil solids and water can be given as Because the weight for the soil element under consideration is w.Gs.gw, the volume occupied by water Gsw w wGsw w Ww Vw . ..  g g g Hence from the definition of degree of saturation, S = Vw/Vv = w. Gs/ e /08/10
  • 42. • Various unit weight relationships: (Usefull for solveing the problem) Moist unit weight (g) Dry unit weight(gd) Saturated unit weight(gsat) wSnnwGs wnwGs S Gsw wGsw e weSGs e wGsw ggg gg g g g g g g ..)1(. )1)(1(. . 1 .).1( 1 )..( 1 .).1(            wnsatd e we satd nwGsd e wGs d w d ggg g gg gg g g g g . 1 . )1(. 1 . 1         wnGsnsat e weGs sat gg g g )].).1[( 1 ).(    
  • 43. • Problem:1 The mass of a soil sample having a volume of 0.0057m3 is 10.5kg, the moisture content (w) and the specific gravity of soil solids(Gs) were determined to be 13% and 2.68, respectively, Determine a. Moist density, r, b. Dry density, rd, c. Void ratio, e, d. Porosity, n, e. Degree of saturation, S (%) Solution: r = M/V, rd = r / (1+w), e = (Gs.gw/rd)-1, n = e/(1+e), S(%) = (w.Gs/e)x100 Problem. 2, A soil has void ratio = 0.72, moisture content = 12% and Gs= 2.72. Determine its (a) Dry unit weight (b) Moist unit weight, and the (c) Amount of water to be added per m3 to make it saturated Problem.3, The dry density of a sand with porosity of 0.387 is 1600 kg/m3. Find the void ratio of the soil and the specific gravity of the soil solids.
  • 44. Problem: A moist soil sample weighs 3.52N. After drying in an oven, its weight is reduced to 2.9N. The specific gravity of solids and the mass specific gravity are respectively 2.65 and 1.85. Determine the water content, void ratio and the degree of saturation. gw = 10kN/m3 Solution: From given data: Weight of water Water content, w g = Gm.gw gd = g/(1+w) gd = G.gw/(1+e) n = e / (1+e) S = w.G/e
  • 45. Relative density Application: In granular soils, the degree of compaction in the field can be measured according to the relative density. Relative density (Dr) = (emax – e)/(emax – emin) Expressed in percentage (%) emax = void ratio of the soil in the loosest state emin = void ration of the soil in the densest state e = insitu void ratio of the soil The term relative density is commonly used to indicate the insitu denseness or looseness of granular soil Some values for granular soil Relative density (%) Description of soil deposit 0 - 15 Very loose 15 - 50 Loose 50 -70 Medium 70 - 85 Dense 85 - 100 Very dense /08/10
  • 46. Problem:2- For a given sandy soil, emax = 0.82, emin = 0.42, Gs = 2.66. In the field the soil is compacted to a moist density of 1720 kg/m3 at a moisture content of 9%. Determine the relative density of compaction. Solution: Calculate the ‘e’ value r = (1+w).Gs.rw/(1+e) Dr = (emax – e) / (emax – emin) Problem:3 The laboratory test results of a sand are as follows, emax = 0.91, emin = 0.48, and Gs = 2.67. What would be the dry and moist unit weights of this sand when compacted at a moisture content of 10% to relative density of 65%? Ans: 16.07kN/m3, 17.68kN/m3
  • 47. Problem: A fully saturated sample of soil has a volume of 25cc. And a weight 0f 40gm. After drying in the oven, its weight is 28gm. With the help of Phase diagram, calculate the, 1.Void ratio, 2. Water content 3. Porosity, 4. degree of saturation 5. Saturated unit weight. (Ans: e= 0.923, w = 42.9%, n = 48%, s =100%, gsat = 1.6 g/cc Problem: when a given soil sample of sand was tested in the laboratory, the void ratio in the loosest and densest possible states were 0.95 and 0.4 respectively . Calculate the 1. Relative density 2. Degree of saturation (Ans: e=, s = %, Dr = %) Problem. Tests on fill reveal that one cubic metre of soil on the fill weighs 1624 kgs and after being dried weighs 1.40 tonnes. If the specific gravity of solida is 2.65, determine w, e, n, s of the soil mass from the first principles.
  • 48. Consistency of soil – Atterberg Limits •Liquid limit (LL): It is the moisture where the soil sample starts behaves like a liquid. •Plastic limit (PL): It is the moisture where the soil sample starts behaves like a plastic •Shrinkage Limit (SL): The moisture content at which the transaction from solid to semi solid state takes place.
  • 49.
  • 50.
  • 51. • Plasticity of a soil is its ability to undergo deformation without cracking or fracturing. • - due to the presence of clay minerals. • Plastic soil can be moulded into various shapes when it is wet.
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54. Liquid Limit test Objective: determination of liquid limit from clay silt soil Apparatus: Liquid limit test device, grooving tools Output: Flow index, IF = (w1 – w2) / log(N2/N1) w1 = moisture content of soil, in percent, corresponding to N1 blows w2 = Moisture content corresponding to N2 blows
  • 55. Liquid limit test device and grooving tools
  • 56.
  • 57. Flow curve for liquid limit determination of clayey siltGraph: X – Number of blows, N y – Moisture content,w (%)
  • 58.
  • 59. • Flow index is the rate at which a soil mass loses its shear strength with an increase in water content. • -- soil with greater value of flow index has a steeper slope, hence lower shear strength as compared to flatter.
  • 60. Plastic Limit Test Plastic limit: The moisture content in percent at which the soil crumbles, when rolled into threads of 3.2mm in diameter. Test: Determination of plastic limit from the laboratory
  • 61.
  • 62. Plasticity Index Plasticity Index: The difference between the Liquid limit and plastic limit. PI = LL – PL When either LL or PL cannot be determined, the soil is non plastic. When the plastic limit is greater than Liquid limit, the plasticity index reported as zero(not negative).
  • 63.
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67. • CI indicates the consistency(firmness) of a soil. • It shows the nearness of water content of the soil to its plastic limit. • A soil with CI of zero is at L.L. it is extremely soft and has negligible shear strength.
  • 68.
  • 69. • Amount of water in a soil mass depends upon the type of clay mineral present. • Activity is a measure of water holding capacity of clayey soil. • The change in the volume of a clayey soil during swelling or shrinkage depend upon the activity.
  • 70.
  • 71.
  • 72. Uses Of Consistency Limits • L.L. and P.L. depend upon the type and amount of clay in a soil. However the P.I, depends on the amount of clay. • The P.I.of a soil is a measure of amount of clay in a soil.
  • 73.
  • 74.
  • 75.
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 80.
  • 81.
  • 82. Classification based on Plasticity chart Silts and clays Liquid limits is 50% or less ML = Inorganic silts with low plasticity CL = Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity OL = Organic silts of low plasticity Aline , PI = 0.73(LL – 20) Silts and clays Liquid limits is greater than 50% MH - Inorganic silts of high plasticity CH – Inorganic clays of high plasticity OH – Organic clays of medium plasticity Pt - Peat or muck or highly organic soils
  • 83. Problem: The weight of a moist soil sample is 20kg and its volume is 0.011m3. After drying in an oven, the weight of sample reduces to 16.5kg. Determine the w, gd, g, e, n, s.
  • 84. Soil structure Single grained Loose state Dense state Structure of Sand
  • 86. Structure of clays Sediment Structure Dispersion Nonsalt Flocculation Salt Flocculation (Na, K )
  • 87. Engineering classification of soils AASHTO Classification system: Soil classified into Seven major groups: Soil classified under groups A-1, A -2, A -3 are granular material of which 35% or less of the particles pass through the no.200(0.075mm) sieve. Soils of which more than 35% pass through the no.200 sieve are classified under groups A -4, A – 5, A -6 & A -7 /08/10
  • 88. AASHTO classification….. 1. Grain size a. Gravel : Particle passing through 75mm sieve and retained on the No.10(2mm) US sieve b. Sand: Particle passing through the no.10(2mm) and retained on the No.200 (0.075mm) US sieve. c. Silt and Clay: Particle passing the no.200 US sieve
  • 90. Group Index (GI): Significance: To evaluate the quality of soil as a highway material. GI = (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)]+0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10) Where, F200 = Percentage passing through the No. 200 sieve LL = liquid limit PI = Plastic limit 1st term - (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)] – Partial group index determined from liquid limit 2nd term - 0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10) – Partial group index determined from plastic limit
  • 91. Group Index……. Note: In general the quality performance of soil as a subgrade material is inversely proportional to the GI 1. If in the equation yields a negative value for GI, it is taken as 0. 2. The group index calculated is rounded off to the nearest whole number 3. There is no upper limit for the group index 4. The group index of soils belonging to groups A–1-a, A- 1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5 and A-3 is always zero
  • 92. Problem 1: The result of the particle size analysis of a soils as follows: a. % passing through no.10 sieve = 100 b. % passing through no.40 sieve = 80 c. % passing through no.200 sieve = 58 liquid limit and plasticity index of the minus no.40 fraction of the soil are 30 and 10 respectively. Calculate the GI Solution: GI = (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)]+0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10)
  • 93. Problem:2, Ninty five percent of a soil passes through the no.200 sieve and has a liquid limit of 60 and plasticity index of 40. Calculate th GI. Solution: GI = (F200 – 35)[0.2+0.005(LL – 40)]+0.01(F200 – 15)(PI -10)
  • 94. Unified Soil Classification System Main points: 1. The classification is based on material passing a 75m sieve. 2. Coarse fraction = percent retained above no.200 sieve = 100 – F200 = R200 3. Fine fraction = percent passing no. 200 sieve = F200 4. Gravel fraction = percent retained above no.4 sieve = R4 /08/10
  • 95. Classification •As per USCS soil divided into groups 1. Coarse grained: Gravel or sand in nature with less than 50% passing through the no.200 sieve. - It represents clear symbols – G (Gravel), S (sand) 2. Fine grained soils: Soils with 50% or more passing through the no.200 sieve. - The group symbols starts with ‘M’(inorganic silts) - ‘C’for inorganic clays, ‘o’organic clays or silts - ‘Pt’used for peat, muck and other highly organic soils
  • 96. Other symbols used for the classification: W – well graded P - poorly graded L – Low plasticity (LL is less than 50%) H – High plasticity (LL more than 50%)
  • 99. AASHTO / USCS classification 1. Both systems are divide the soil into two major groups, that is coarse and fine grained soils as separated by sieve no . 200 (75m) 2. a. According to the AASTHO system a soil is considered fine grained when more than 35% passes through the no.200 sieve b. USCS more than 50% passes through the no.200 sieve. 3. a. USCS Gravelly and sandy soils clearly separated, b. AASHTO it is A-2 4. Clear symbols used in USCS (GW, SM, CH) , but in A in AASHTO classification
  • 100. 5. a. AASHTO system, the no.10 sieve is used to separate gravel from sand. b. USCS no. 4 sieve is used, upper limits appropriate concrete and highway technology using no. 10(2mm) sieve. 6. a. USCS clearly organic soil classification (OL, OH, Pt) are given, b. in AASHTO there is no classification for organic soils