Cholera is an acute diarrheal infection of the small intestine caused by the ingestion of food and water contaminated by bacterium vibrio cholera. An estimated 3–5 million cholera cases resulting to about 120 000 deaths yearly. Nigeria accounts for 38% of cases from Africa with 44,456 cases, with highest case fatality rate (CFR) of 5.1% in Sub-Sahara Africa (WHO, 2010). In Nigeria, 18 States in 2010 reported the outbreak of cholera with about 41,787 cases and1,716 deaths (case-fatality rate [CFR]: 4.1%). In 2010, men had a higher prevalence (5.1%) than in women (4.9%)
2. OBJECTIVE
o To outline cholera in Nigeria
o To describe and interpret the needs of Nigerians using epidemiological,
quantitative and/or qualitative data.
o To describe the strategy implemented in Nigeria
o To describe how intervention will reduce the burden of cholera disease,
to provide evidence from the literature of the effectiveness of this
intervention.
o To review published literature to provide evidence on the effectiveness
of hand washing
o To outline what actions would need to be undertaken, and by whom, in
order to implement the intervention.
3. CHOLERA
is an acute diarrheal infection of the small intestine caused by the ingestion
of food and water contaminated by bacterium vibrio cholera.
An estimated 3–5 million cholera cases resulting to about 120 000 deaths
yearly.
Nigeria accounts for 38% of cases from Africa with 44,456 cases, with
highest case fatality rate (CFR) of 5.1% in Sub-Sahara Africa (WHO,
2010)
In Nigeria, 18 States in 2010 reported the outbreak of cholera with about
41,787 cases and1,716 deaths (case-fatality rate [CFR]: 4.1%).
In 2010, men had a higher prevalence (5.1%) than in women (4.9%)
Highest cholera cases of 4,600 cases was reported in Bauchi and 5,704
in Katsina States.in the Northern Nigeria (Dalhat et al, 2014)
5. Epidemiologic week of first reported cases in the Local
Government areas during the three waves (Wave 1 (A): week 1 –
week 9; wave 2 (B): week 10 – week 24; wave 3 (C): week 25 –
week 42) (Dalhat et al., 2014)
7. POPULATION AT RISK OF CHOLERA
Everyone is at risk
But the most vulnerable group are malnourished children, people
living with HIV and elderly people due to low level of immunity.
40.9% of children below 5 years are mostly affected
Refugees
Internally displaced persons(IDPs)
(Sack et al, 2004)
8. AGE DISTRIBUTION OF CHOLERA AND AGE-
SPECIFIC CASE FATALITY RATES OF CHOLERA
CASES, NIGERIA 2010
.
(Dalhat et al., 2014)
Age
group
DocumentedC
ases
Attack
rate per
100,000
0-4
years
3940 3.9
5-
17years
5015 5.1
18-
44years
430 4.4
45-64
years
1282 9.5
65 and
above
297 14.5
Table 1 Table2
9. TRENDS IN CHOLERA CASES AND DEATH IN NIGERIA
Outbreak of cholera was
worsened by destroyed
sanitation and water
infrastructure .
Lower coverage of effective
drainage systems and latrines
resulting to overflowing of
latrines and contamination of
wells and surface water due to
flooding in the rainy season.
Year Cases Deaths CFR(%)
2010 41,787 1,716 4.1
2011 23,377 742 3.17
2012 597 18 3.02
2013 6.600 229 3.47
10. DATA ON MAJOR CHOLERA OUTBREAKS IN NIGERIA,
1991-1999
Year States Source No. Of
reported
cases
Case
Fatality
Rates
Age
grour
1991 Cross
river
--------- 588 13% ----
1992 Katsina Well
water
622 7.7% 11-30
years
1995/199
6
Kano Water
source
2,630 15% 0-5 years
1997 Jos flood 847 23% 20-29
years
1999 Kano --------- 2,347 2% 0-5 years
1996 Ibadan Satched
water
1,384 5.3% children
(Adagbada et al,, 2012)
11. POPULATIONS NEEDS
A study in Nigeria by Dalhat et al in identified the peples need as:
Need for effective surveillance and response.
Sufficient access to services
Qualified health workers.
Another study in Nigeria by Adagbada et al in 2012 identified the
need of the people as:
o Need for adequate manpower, equipment and medications.
o Improvement on surveillance system, for early alert of cholera
outbreak.
o Mechanisms for quick intervention to prevent infection.
o Intervention measures to address poor sanitation and unsafe
water supplies in order to prevent new cholera cases.
o Establishment of communication channel and reporting.
12. RISK FACTORS
Poverty
Age
Gender
Poor infrastructures
(slum)
High population density
low education,
lack of previous exposure
Low immunity
Poor sanitary and
hygienic
Exposure to
contaminated food and
water
Periods of flood
(Ali et al, 2012;
Adagbada et al, 202;
WHO, 2014 )
13. HAND WASHING PROMOTION
Hand washing with soap is a “do-it-yourself vaccine” that
prevents the spread of cholera infections.
It is cost-effective, easy and effective.
(WHO, 2014)
14. ACTION: HAND WASHING INTERVENTION
Advocacy: Promote campaign to create awareness
IEC Materials (posters and flyers)
Health Education on hand-washing
Qualified health workers
Technique:
Wet hands with safe water
Lather with soap thoroughly, if no soap, scrub your
hands with sand or ash
Cover all surfaces, including under nails
Rinse hands well with safe water
Dry hands using clean towel or air dry
15. STEERING GROUPS
This is the involvement/engagement of key stakeholders
which includes
Federal Ministry of Health
NGOs (UNICEF, WHO)
Donor agencies
Public health practitioners
Community health workers
Community gatekeepers
Private organisation; pharmaceutical companies
Mass media
16. EVIDENCE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
HANDWASHING PROMOTION
A study by Shahid, N.S., Greenough, W.B 3rd,, Samadi, A.R.,
Hug, M.I, Rahman, N., (1996) indicates that hand washing with
soap promotion can attain 26 to 62% decrease in the incidence
of cholera.
A randomised control study done by...in Malawi, showed
incidence rate of cholera reduced from 69% to31% in under five
children.
Hand-washing with soap can reduces the risk of cholera infection
by 42%-47% (Curtis and Cairncross, 2003).
Hand-washing reduces cholera incidence by 89% (Wilson,
Chandler, Muslihatun & Jamiluddin, 1991).
WHO reports that hand-washing with soap is one of the surest
ways to prevent cholera transmission.
17. ARTICLES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HAND
WASHING INTERVENTION
Study Participant
s
Study type Results Strength Weakness
Hutin, Luby
& Paquet,
2009
102 cholera
cases
77
controlled
group
Case
control
study
Hand
washing
with soap
before
eating
reduces
outbreak of
cholera
from 26 to
62%
Groups
matched by
sex
Age
stratificatio
n
Use of
control
groups
Lack of
control:
response
initiative
Confounder
s:socio-
economic
status
Mahamud
et al., 2012
93 cases
and 93
controlled
group
Case
control
study
Provision of
soap and
being
educated
on hygiene
Groups
matched by
age and
area of
residence
Recall bias
of inquiry of
exposure
Unclear
transmissio
n route
18. ARTICLES OF THE RISK FACTORS OF CHOLERA
DISEASE
Study Participant
s
Study
Type
Findings Strength Weakness
Dubois,
Sinkala,
Kalluri,
Makasachi
koya &
Quick,
2006
71 cases
and 71
controls
Case
Control
Study
Hand
washing
interrupts
disease
transmissio
n in food
borne
outbreak
Groups
matched
by area
Controls
not tested
Huang, D.
and Zhou,
J. (2007).
75 cases &
73 controls
Randomise
d control
trial
Incidence of
cholera in
tervention
group was
lower than
in control
group
Process of
randomisa
tion
Similarity
in groups
Blindings
Recall bias
Generalisa
bility
19. Study Participa
nts
Study
Type
Findings Strengths & weakness
Danny V.
Colombar
a mail,
Karen D.
Cowgill,
Abu S. G.
Faruque,
2013
Hospitalis
ed under
five
children
Survey
study
Increasing age, lower
socioeconomic status,
and lack of breastfeeding
increased risk for cholera
among under five
large sample size
well-defined population,
systematic sampling, expert
laboratory diagnosis of V.
Cholerae
Misclassification bias
self-reported water and
sanitation measures
Dalhat,
M., Isa, A.,
Nguku, P.,
Nasir, S.,
Urban, K.,
&
Abdulaziz,
M. et al.
(2014).
populatio
n of
44,121,2
23 in the
10 states
Descriptiv
e study
Limited access to health
care;
Scarce health care
system ;
Poor sanitation ;
poor surveillance system
Large number of cases
Absence of data
Recall bias
Confounders
Temporality issues
ARTICLES OF THE RISK FACTORS OF CHOLERA
DISEASE
20. Study Particip
ants
Study
Type
Findings Strengths & weakness
Rosewell, A.,
Addy, B.,
Komnapi, L.,
Makanda, F.,
Ropa, B., &
Posanai, E.
et al. (2012).
54
suspec
ted
cholera
cases
and
122
control
s.
Case
control
study
piped water distribution
system and sanitation
will likely reduce
transmission
by enabling enhanced
hygiene and limiting the
contamination of water
sources.
Groups matched by
age,sex, education and
employment
Use of a control group
Small sample size
Acosta, C.,
Galindo, C.,
Kimario, J.,
Senkoro, K.,
Urassa, H., &
Casals, C. et
al. (2001).
180
cases
and
360
matche
d
control
s
Case
control
study
bathing in the river,
eating dried fish, and
living>10 minutes
walking distance from
the closest water
source.
Groups matched by
age
Use of control group
Small sample size
Temporality issues
ARTICLES OF THE RISK FACTORS OF CHOLERA
DISEASE
21. EVIDENCE FOR LITERATURE SEARCH
SOURCE SEARCH TERMS HITS LIMITERS REVI
EWE
D
Medline Cholera*, cholera in
Nigeria,
Vibro cholerea
5 Nigeria, Full text,
Abstract, Peer reviewed,
Public health,
Academic Journal,
3
Cinhal cholera OR vibro
cholerae AND risk
factors in Nigeria OR V.
cholerae AND Nigeria
29 English language, full
text, scholarly journals
date (2000-2014)
2
PubMed Cholera , cholera in
Nigeria, Vibro cholerea
57 Nigeria, Full text,
Abstract, Peer reviewed,
Ten years, advanced
search
3
Search resulted in 4 studies chosen to be included in this presentation after most suitable
abstract where reviewed .
22. CONCLUSION
Nigeria accounts for 38% of cholera cases from Africa
with 44,456 cases With highest case fatality rate (CFR) of
5.1% in Sub-Sahara Africa
Everyone is at risk, but the most vulnerable group are
malnourished children, people living with HIV and elderly
people due to low level of immunity.
Typical at-risk areas with cholera infection are
communities with poor infrastructures, poor sanitation and
hygiene and exposure to contaminated water and food.
Evidence shows that Handwashing with soap is an
effective intervention that prevents the spread of cholera
infections
23.
24. REFERENCES
Acosta, C., Galindo, C., Kimario, J., Senkoro, K., Urassa, H., & Casals, C. et
al. (2001). Cholera Outbreak in Southern Tanzania: Risk Factors and
Patterns of Transmission. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 7(7), 583-587.
doi:10.3201/eid0707.017741
Ali, M.; Emch, M.; Donnay, J.P; Yunus, M. & Sack R.B. (2002a). Identifying
environmental risk factors of endemic cholera: a raster GIS approach.
Health & Place 8 (3): 201-210
Ajoke Olutola Adagbada, Solayide Abosede Adesida, Francisca Obiageri
Nwaokorie,Mary-Theresa Niemogha, Akitoye Olusegun Coker,(2012)
Cholera Epidemiology in Nigeria: an overview.
The Pan African Medical Journal;12:59
Andrawa, M., Anguzu, P., Anguaku, A., Nalwadda, C., Namusisi, O., &
Tweheyo, R. (2010). Risk factors for repeated cholera outbreak in Arua
municipal council, north-western Uganda. International Journal Of
Infectious Diseases, 14, e65. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.1633
Adagbada, A. O., Adesida, S. A., Nwaokorie, F. O., Niemogha, M.-T., & Coker,
A. O. (2012). Cholera Epidemiology in Nigeria: an overview. The Pan
African Medical Journal, 12, 59.
25. Contzen, N., & Mosler, H. (2013). Impact of different promotional channels on handwashing
behaviour in an emergency context: Haiti post-earthquake public health promotions
and cholera response. Journal Of Public Health, 21(6), 559-573. doi:10.1007/s10389-
013-0577-4
Colombara DV, Cowgill KD, Faruque ASG (2013) Risk Factors for Severe Cholera among
Children under Five in Rural and Urban Bangladesh, 2000–2008: A Hospital-Based
Surveillance Study. PLoS ONE 8(1): e54395. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054395
Curtis , V & Cairncross, S, (2003) Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the
community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 3: 275–281.
Dalhat, M., Isa, A., Nguku, P., Nasir, S., Urban, K., & Abdulaziz, M. et al. (2014). Descriptive
characterization of the 2010 cholera outbreak in Nigeria. BMC Public Health, 14(1),
1167. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1167
DUBOIS, A., SINKALA, M., KALLURI, P., MAKASA-CHIKOYA, M., & QUICK, R. (2006).
Epidemic cholera in urban Zambia: hand soap and dried fish as protective factors.
Epidemiol. Infect., 134(06), 1226. doi:10.1017/s0950268806006273
Huang, D. and Zhou, J. (2007). Effect of intensive handwashing in the prevention of diarrhoeal
illness among patients with AIDS: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Medical
Microbiology, 56(5), pp.659-663.
Hutin Y., Luby S., Paquet C.(2003) A large cholera outbreak in Kano City, Nigeria: The
importance of hand washing with soap and the danger of street-vended water. J. Water
Health.;1:45–52.
26. Igomu T.(2011) Cholera epidemic: Far from being over. : Nigerian Latest News
Papers News Online. Retrieved 21 November 2014, from
http://www.nigerianbestforum.com/blog/cholera-epidemic-far-from-being-over/
Kelly, L. (2001). The global dimension of cholera. Glob. Chang. Hum. Health 2(1):6-
17
Mahamud, A., Ahmed, J., Nyoka, R., Auko, E., Kahi, V., & Ndirangu, J. et al. (2012).
Epidemic cholera in Kakuma Refugee Camp, Kenya, 2009: the importance of
sanitation and soap. J Infect Dev Ctries, 6(03). doi:10.3855/jidc.1966
Rosewell, A., Addy, B., Komnapi, L., Makanda, F., Ropa, B., & Posanai, E. et al.
(2012). Cholera risk factors, Papua New Guinea, 2010. BMC Infect Dis, 12(1),
287. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-287
Sack DA, Sack RB, Balakrish G, Siddique AK. (2004) Cholera. Lancet;363:223—33
Shahid N, Greenough W, Samadi A, Huq M, Rahaman N. (1996)Hand washing with
soap reduces diarrhoea and spread of bacterial pathogens in a Bangladesh
village. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res 1996; 14:85–89
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2010) Haiti:
cholera situation report #24. Available: http://reliefweb.int/node/377376.
Accessed 4 May 2011
27. UNICEF (2014) Nigeria Cholera Situation Report Retried
from:http://reliefweb.int/report/nigeria/unicef-nigeria-cholera-situation-report-10-
february-2014
Wilson, J., Chandler, G., Muslihatun, & Jamiluddin,. (1991). Hand-washing reduces
diarrhoea episodes: a study in Lombok, Indonesia. Transactions Of The Royal
Society Of Tropical Medicine And Hygiene, 85(6), 819-821. doi:10.1016/0035-
9203(91)90468-e
World Health Organization, (2010) Global Task Force on Cholera Control. In Weekly
Epidemiological Record: Cholera Articles. WHO.
World Health Organisation Statistics,(2009) Retrieved
from:http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2009/en/ elected infectious diseases.
World Health Organisation,. (2014). WHO | Cholera. Retrieved 11 December 2014, from
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs107/en/
World Health Organization Global Task Force on Cholera Control (2011) Prevention.
Prevention and control of cholera outbreaks: WHO policy and recommendations.
Available: http://www.who.int/cholera/technical/prevention/control/en/index2.html.
World Health Organization,. (2014). WHO | SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands - WHO's
global annual campaign. Retrieved 11 December 2014, from
http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/en/
Editor's Notes
This presentation will demonstrate the health needs of Nigerians.
This presentation will firstly describe cholera in Nigeria, following this, it will describe and interpret the needs of Northern Nigerians using epidemiological, quantitative and/or qualitative data. We will look at the strategy implemented in Northern Nigeria, describe how intervention will reduce the burden of the disease and/or inequalities. Provide evidence from the literature of the effectiveness of this intervention. In addition we will review published literature to provide evidence on the effectiveness of hand washing and finally outline what actions would need to be undertaken, and by whom, in order to implement the intervention
-In 2010, the outbreak of cholera was report in some regions in Nigeria especially in the Northern region with a total of 41,787 cases including 1,716 deaths with (case-fatality rate 4.1%). This exceeded the average overall CFR of 2.4% reported in 2005 accepted by World Health Organisation. Nigeria accounts for 38% of cases in Sub-Sahara Africa with 44,456 cases and (CFR) of 3.9% .
-Nigeria CFR of 5.1% was the highest in Sub-Sahara Africa in 2010. Incident rate were higher in men (5.1%) with 395 deaths in 7319 cases than in women (4.9%) with 389 deaths in 7997 cases.
-The highest cholera cases were seen in Bauchi (4,660) and Katsina States (5,704) with attack rate of 87.4% and 87.2% respectively due to flooding occurring between August and October 2010.
More than 80% of total cholera cases in Nigeria were recorded in the Northern part of the country during rainy season. The 2010 cholera outbreak was reported as the largest epidemic in Nigeria since 1991 when 41,787 cases and 1,716 deaths were seen due to poor conditions of overcrowding, poverty and poor sanitation , poor hygiene by poor hygiene practices among the affected population and the flooding due to heavy rainfall in the Northern Nigerian region (Dalhat et al., 2014).
These maps shows the three waves (incidence) of the upsurge of cholera in Northern Nigeria. High population mobility, flooding, consumption of unsafe water and food, poor hygiene and sanitation within this region has been shown to have increased the risk of cholera infection.
This data shows the incidence rate of cholera in the first peak in week 4 with 85 cases per week reported for two states. The second peak detected in week 21 reported 444 cases per week reported for five states. The most prominent peak which was the third peak observed in week 33 with all states affected with 2,476 cases per week,. Subsequently, with the exclusion of week 36, cholera outbreak began to decline with only 3 cases reported in the epidemiological week 43 in Northern Nigeria.
Studies shows that only 58% of the Nigerian population have access to safe water and sanitation, which poses a high risk for the spread of cholera cases to states which have not previously reported any cases (UNICEF, 2010).
The whole Nigerian population is at risk of cholera, but the most vulnerable group are children and elderly people due to low level of immunity
The rate of cholera in the first wave was higher in children below 5 years than in other population. Generally, children below 5 years have the highest incidence of cholera after exposure and the age-specific mortality is highest in this age group, however, during the 2010 outbreak in Nigeria a different pattern was seen. It was only during the 1st wave that children below 5 years were seen to be most affected. In the 2nd and 3rd wave most of cases were found in adults. This was as a result of increased exposure to the cholera infection due to limited access to safe water during the flooding.
In the 3rd wave, the age specific fatality rate was highest among 65 years and above with 14.5% , this was as a result of scarce health care services due to flooding, limited access to health care facilities and subsequent displacement due to flooding moreover the high CFR may also be related to co-morbidities in this age group.
Focus on the outbreak of cholera was worsened particularly in the Northern part of Nigeria , as a result of poor hygiene. destroyed sanitation and water infrastructure by overflowing of latrines and contamination of wells and surface water due to flooding. Migrant seeking to escape from outbreak spread cholera in other part of Nigeria . Cholera outbreaks normally occur in the rainy season. The Northern part of Nigeria reporting a higher incident rate of cholera was also due to lower coverage of effective drainage systems and latrines. 855 cases and 20 deaths (CFR 3.3%) were reported in 9 States as of January 2014 (Federal Ministry of Health, 2014).
This data reported the incidence of cholera in five states across Nigeria. The cases of cholera reported during the 1991-1999 outbreak resulted in difference in the CFR among the different states, which are attributed to the differences in , climate, geographical location, infrastructure, hygiene, sanitation, drainage systems and toilet systems.
A study by Dalhat et al in 2014 identified the populations need to be:
-need for effective surveillance and response with proper documentation.
-trained and devoted health workers towards timely detection and response as well as proper documentation
Another study in Nigeria by Adagbada et al in 2012 identified the need of the people to be:
-Need for adequate manpower, equipment and medications
-Improvement on surveillance system, for early alert of cholera outbreak.
Mechanisms for quick intervention to prevent infection .
-Intervention measures to address poor sanitation and unsafe water supplies in order to prevent new cholera cases
-Establishment of communication channel and reporting.
-introduction of contact tracing strategies
Typical at-risk areas with cholera infection are communities with poor infrastructures (slums), overcrowding, disruption of water and sanitation systems and exposure to contaminated water and food (WHO, 2014).
Young children, people living with HIV and elderly people, with low immunity are the more vulnerable to cholera infection.
Other risk factors for cholera infection includes gender, economic status, travellers, age, periods of flood and poor sanitary conditions (Ali et al, 2012;
Adagbada et al, 202; WHO, 2014).
Hand washing Promotion: Hand washing with soap is a “do-it-yourself vaccine” that prevents the spread of cholera infections.
it is cost-effective, easy and effective (WHO, 2014).
Action needed to implement intervention includes
Advocacy: organising mass campaign in native dialects to create awareness to most at risk group on hand washing methods and technique.
Distribution of posters and flyer and involvement of qualified health workers.
Health education to promote good personal hygiene with emphasis of a proper hand washing method with soap is strongly required for prevention and control of cholera.
With rapid urbanization and population growth
coupled with inadequate sanitation, inadequate water supply and poor sewage disposal,
most towns in Nigeria are at risk of cholera outbreaks. Frequent electric
power failures affect the availability of pipeborne water. A lot of people in the
North depend on well water from poorly constructed wells generally without
casing. In compounds where both a well and a pit latrine exist, the risk of
contamination of the well water is often high.
Contaminated water is an important vehicle for spread of cholera. Human faeces
are the main source of contamination and cholera outbreaks are typically
The handwashing promotion intervention involves the engagement of key stakeholders which includes: The Federal Ministry of Health , States department of public health; Non governmental organisations (UNICEF, WHO); donor agencies, This is the involvement/engagement of key stakeholders which includes: Federal Ministry of Health, NGOs (UNICEF, WHO),Donor agencies, Public health practitioners, Community health workers, Community gatekeepers, Private organisation; pharmaceutical companies and Mass media.
Hand washing can significantly reduce cholera infections, as well as other diseases. Curtis and Cairncross in a recent study in 2003 reportedthat handwashing with soap reduces the risk of cholera infection by 42%-47%. In addition, WHO also reports that hand-washing with soap before eating and after the use of toilet is the most effective means of preventing cholera transmission. Similarly, a study in Haiti reports that the low incidence of cholera infection was as a result to the effectiveness of hand washing intervention (UN, 2010). Nonetheless, hand-washing education and soap distribution and should be scaled up in at risk areas in Nigeria. Another study by, Shahid, N.S., Greenough, W.B 3rd,, Samadi, A.R., Hug, M.I, & Rahman, N., (1996) reported that the promotion of hand washing achieved 26-62% decrase in choera incidence in poor resource settings
While cholera is prevalent in low urban communities in certain geographical areas like Mexico [19], the disease has predominated in urban and overcrowded communities in Ghana. Intermittent water supply coupled with indiscriminate sanitation practices in urban communities in Ghana puts inhabitants at risk of contracting cholera. study the spatial patterns of cholera, identify territories of high risk, and determine demographic risk factors that contribute to high rates of cholera
Database such as Medline, Cinhal & PubMed were used to source fore
Search terms: cholera OR vibro cholerae OR V. cholerae AND Nigeria
Limited by:, English language, full text, scholarly journals date (2000-2014)
Most suitable abstracts were examined
Cinhal: 49 Medline: Pub med:108
Search resulted in 4 studies chosen to be included in this presentation