The document discusses the division of the Bible into the Old and New Testaments. It argues that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John describe the final years of the Old Testament age, not the beginning of the New Testament. It asserts that Jesus's teachings in those gospels were about the Old Testament law of Moses, not New Testament doctrine, and were intended for Jews, not Gentiles. The document claims the traditional division of the Bible obscures the distinction between the Old and New Covenants.

1. “”Rightly Dividing” The Books, Chapters And Verses Of The Bible Into
Their Scriptural Old And New Covenants And Covenant Ages
Old Testament
Patriarchal Age:
Several Different
Covenants
With individuals
and families
Adam, Noah,
Abraham
Gen. 1 - Ex.19
Ended ----->
History
Old Testament
Mosaical Age:
One Covenant
With One Nation
Israel
Exodus 20 -
John 19
Ended at
The Cross------>
History
New Testament
Christian Age:
New covenant is open to
all mankind...but made
with only the N.T. Church
Acts 2 thru Revelation 22
Only the New Covenant is
open and applicable for
salvation today!
50 days
Between
Old - New
Testaments
Described in
Matthew 28
Mark 16
Luke 24
John 20-21
Acts 1
No covenant
* No book, chapter or verse in he Bible belongs to two different covenants.
* The Scriptures teach that there was 50 days between the Old and New
Testaments -- not 450 years as the Roman Catholic church teaches.
* Each covenant must be interpreted by what it teaches, not by what another
covenant teaches.

2. What The Scriptures Teach About The Old Testament Age #1
And Doctrine Of Matthew, Mark, Luke And John (MMLJBC)...
1. MMLJBC describe the last thrty-three years (33) of the Old Testament
age -- not the “beginning” of the New Testament age. Therefore, the Scrip-
tures teach that Malachi is not the last book of the Old Testament age and
Matthew is not the first book of the New Testament age.
2. In MMLJBC, in the closing three years of the Old Testament Mosaical age ,
the angels proclaimed that Jesus was sent as the Messiah to be the old cove-
nant “Savior” of only the “lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt. 1:21; 2:6. Jesus
also confirmed his Old Testament mission to only the “lost sheep of the house of
Israel” (Matt. 15:24).
3. In MMLJBC, Jesus declares more than 100 times that he is teaching the
Old Testament law of Moses; not once did he ever state that he was teach-
ing New Testament doctrine. In MMLJBC, several hundred times the Scrip-
tures describe Christ teaching the Old Testament law of Moses; not once
do they ever describe him teaching New Testament doctrine.
Chart 388

3. Understanding Old Testament Age And Doctrine MMLJBC #2
3. In MMLJBC, Jesus addressed his old covenant message to the Old Tes-
tament Jews of Isral, not the alien Gentiles of the day. Jesus never ad-
dressed his teaching of the Old Testament law of Moses to alien or
non-covenant Gentiles. In MMLJBC, Jesus never addressed his message to
New Testament “Christians.” In fact, in MMLJBC he never used the word
“Christian.”
4. In MMLJBC, Jesus was an Old Testament “Israelite” -- not a New Testament
“Christian.”Jesus was a member of the Old Testament “kingdom” of Israel -- not a
member of the New Testament “kingdom” or “church.”
5. In MMLJBC, Jesus was an Old Testament “prophet” -- not a New Testament
“evangelist.” In MMLJBC, Jesus “restored” unfaithful Jews back to God under the
law of Moses, he did not save alien sinners by the New Testament “gospel.”
6. In MMLJBC, Jesus preached only the Old Testament “gospel” of the law of
Moses (Matt. 19:16-20), he never preached the New Testament “gospel” of his
death, burial and resurrection (1 Cor. 15:1-4).
Chart 388.1

4. Understanding Old Testament Age And Doctrine MMLJBC #3
7. In MMLJBC, Jesus preached the Old Testament “plan of salvtion” in the law of
Moses for Jews only (Matt. 19:16-20), he did not preach the New Testament
“plan of salvation” for alien sinners from “all nations” (Matt. 28:18-20).
8. In MMLJBC, every time Jesus used the word “disciple” or “brethren” he was
referring to the Old Testament Jewish children of God in Israel, not to New Testa-
ment “Christians.”
9. In MMLJBC, Jesus quotes the Old Testament law of Moses hundreds of times
in harmonizing his teaching with the Old Testament law of Moses. The teaching
of Christ in MMLJBC is never quoted in his revelation of New Testament doctrine
in Acts 2 through Revelation 22.
10. In MMLJBC, Jesus preached Old Testament “faith,” old covenant “religion,”
“worship,” “righteousness, “ “hope,” “salvation,” but he never preached the New
Testament “gospel.”
Chart 381.2

5. Christ and The Law Of Moses in mmljbc...
* Old testament “religion” of israel
* old testament “faith,” “tEACHING.”-“works of the law”
* old testament “worship” - temple, synagogues, homes
* old testament “prayers of jews” Chart 388.3
* old testament “righteousness”
* old testament “example,” “inference,” “promises”
* old testament “hope” of salvation in the law
* Christ: “Salvation is for the Jews “ only (Matt. 15:24)
* Christ: “Salvation IS of the jews” only (Jn. 5:22)

6. The Old And New Testament “Words” of Christ
Before the Cross! After the Cross!
Old Testament
“Words”
Of Christ
Teaching The
Law of Moses In
MMLJBC
Harmonizes
With the law
Ex. 20-Jn. 19
New Testament
“Words”
Of Christ
In Teaching
Acts 2 -Rev. 22
Does Not
Harmonize
With The Law!
Chart 388.4

7. “All” New Testament “Truth”
“Before the cross” “After the cross”
Christ’s Promise
To The Apostles:
“Howbeit when he,
the Spirit of truth is come,
he will guide you into
,...for he shall not
speak of himsef, but what-
soever he shall hear, that
shall he speak...for he
shall receive of mine...”
(John 16:13-15)
Acts 2
Pentecost
“And they were all
filled with the Holy
Ghost, and began to
speak with other
tongues...And how we
hear everyman in our
own tongue, wherein
we were born.”
(Acts 2:3, 8) Chart 388.5

8. The “Mystery” Of Christ...
“Before the cross “After the cross”
Old Testament
*Prophecy
MMLJBC
*Parables
*Prophecies:
New Covenant
New Birth
Kingdom
Church
Foreknowledge!
New Testament
“How that by revela-
tion he made known
unto me the
Whereby, when ye read
ye may understand my
knowledge in the
mystery of Christ”
(Eph. 3:3-4)
Revelation!
Chart 388.6

9. NOT ONE QUOTE FROM MMLJBC...
IN ACTS 2 - REVELATION 22!
* In revealing New Testament doctrine in Acts
2 through Revelation 22, Christ did not quote
one thing from his teaching in MMLJBC as his
revelation of New Testament doctrine
* In revealing New Testament doctrine, nei-
ther the Holy Spirit nor the apostles quoted
from Christ’s teaching in MMLJBC! Chart 388.7
NOT ONE QUOTE!!!

10. WHAT IS THE ISSUE?
* Not the inspiration of the Scriptures!
* Not the number of books in the Bible!
* Not the fundamental doctrine - the church.
1. It is the 1486 AD Roman Catholic division
of the books of the Bible into the Old and New
Testaments. It is their moving of MMLJ/BC from
the Old to the New Testament and the doctrinal
corruption this has created.
Chart 388.8
2. It is the “teaching of the Scriptures” ver-
sus the “human religious traditions” of today!

11. The Scriptures Teach...
1. Bible “rightly divided” into sepa-
rate covenants and covenant ages.
2. Each covenant must be interpret-
ed by what it teaches, not by what
another covenant teaches.
3. Old Covenant teaching of the law
of Moses is never N. T. Doctrine.Chart 388.9

12. The Scriptures Teach...
4. If a doctrine is not revealed and
printed in the New Testament - it is
not New Testament doctrine!
5. The Scriptures do not produce
human “traditions” or “doctrines.”
6. Human “traditions” -“doctrines”
both deny and contradict the Scrip-
tures. They produce Sectarianism!
Chart 388.10

13. Christ’s Teaching - MMLJBC...
1. By Christ’s direct instruction, his teach-
ing in MMLJBC was to be preached only to -
Old Testament “house of Israel.”
“These twelve Jesus sent forth, and com-
manded them saying, Go not into the way of
the Gentiles, and enter into the cities of the
Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the
lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt. 10:5-
6).
Teaching of MMLJBC not for Gentiles!
Chart 388.11

14. Other Ancient “Gospels”
* The Aquarian Gospel
* Gospel of Mary Magdeliene
* Gospel of Nicodemus, Essenenes
* Gospel of Philip, Thomas, Peace
* Lost Gospel of Peter
* The Gospel of “Q” Chart 388.12
Like all of the above, the fourteen books of
the Roman Catholic “apocgrypha” were re-
jected because their teaching did not harmo-
nize with the teaching of the New Testament!

15. Why Were MMLJBC Written?
1. Not to describe the “beginning” of N.T.
2. To describe the “end” of the O.T. Mosaical
age and God’s old covenant with Israel.
3. To bring a “written” end of the law of Mo-
ses to help teach and convince the Jews of the
1st and subsequent centuries of the Messiah’s
work and that they could no longer approach
God through the old law covenant and/or tem-
ple sacrifices. Chart 388.13

16. WHEN WERE MMLJBC “WRITTEN”?
* This means that this Old Testament info
was not mentioned or preached during Christ’s,
Holy Spirit’s or apostles’ preaching in Acts!
* This means that MMLJ/BC was not a part
of Christ’s New Testament “gospel” or “the
apostles’ doctrine” preached in Acts! Chart 388.14
* This means that MMLJ/BC was not a part
of New Testament “faith” during first 35 years
of New Testament “age” and history of -
church!

17. Chart 388.15
Old Testament
Law of Moses
Taught by Christ
In MMLJBC - 100’s
New Testament
“Grace” and “Truth”
Came by Christ
through the apostles!
0
Christ never used
- word “grace”
in MMLJ/BC!
Christ used the
word “grace” some
times in N.T.
0

18. What About...
The Sermon On The Mount?
Old Testament Law Of Moses?
New Testament Law of Christ?
Christ - The Last Old Testament “Prophet”...
“18I will raise them up a Prophet from among their
brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his
mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall
command him” (Deut. 18:18).
Chart 389

19. “And I will put my words in his mouth...”
Deut. 18:18
Jesus said, "Nevertheless I must walk to day, and tomorrow, and the day fol-
lowing: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem" (Lk. 13:33).
Peter said, "For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord
your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all
things whatsoever he shall say unto you...Unto you first God, having raised up
his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his
iniquities" (Acts 3:22, 26).
Fourteen times in the book of John, John the baptizer of Israel and Jesus
the Messiah and last prophet sent to Israel declared openly and publicly to the
Jews of Old Testament Israel that Christ's teaching in Matthew, Mark, Luke and
John -- before the cross (MMLJBC) -- was not his "own words" or a revelation of
his New Testament doctrine. They declared that it was the Messiah's teaching of
the Old Testament "will of God" for only Israel. The same old covenant "will of
God" as earlier revealed by Moses and the prophets in the law of Moses from
Exodus 20 through Malachi 4. 389.1

20. “And I will put my words in his mouth” #2
John 6:38: "38For I came down from heaven, not to do mine
own will, but the will of him that sent me."
John 7:16-17: "16Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is
not mine, but his that sent me.
John 8:28: "28Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up
the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do noth-
ing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these
things."
John 12:49-50: "49For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father
which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say,
and what I should speak. 50And I know that hiscommandment is
life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father
said unto me, so I speak."Chart 389.3

21. Most Misunderstood “Page” In The Bible...
1. No divine division authorized between books of
Malachi and Matthew from 33 AD to 1486 AD.
2. Maltreatment of Scriptures during the “dark ag-
es” by the apostate church.
3. Roman Catholic “heresy” of 1486 AD when their
translators, publishers and printers -- because of
Protestant pressure, placed first New Testament “title
page” between Malachi and Matthew in divide be-
tween the Old and New Testaments.