This document discusses measuring innovation in the informal economy. It proposes three approaches: 1) adapting formal economy innovation surveys, 2) adding innovation questions to informal economy surveys, and 3) conducting interview-based studies. Two viable options are identified: adding questions to existing informal economy surveys or conducting ad hoc sectoral studies. The document recommends starting with qualitative studies to better understand informal innovation before integrating questions into large-scale surveys. Overall, the goal is to develop a standardized approach to measuring innovation in the informal economy across Africa.
Ukraine: National Export Strategy Consultation. Innovation - An International...Subhrendu Chatterji
Introductory presentation to Ukranian National Export Strategy consultation participants on concepts re developing an export-oriented national innovation system and policies.
The Oslo Manual is the international reference guide for collecting and using data on innovation. In this new 4th edition, published in October 2018, the manual has been updated to take into account a broader range of innovation-related phenomena as well as the experience gained from recent rounds of innovation surveys in OECD countries and partner economies and organisations.
Area of Work: Innovation
Title: Key Factors influencing Countries Innovation
Objectives: Evaluating the Components that contribute to a county’s innovation Performance.
For efficient use of resources in those areas, will help developing countries to emerge on a fast track.
Methodology: Using Regression model (panel data analysis)
Ukraine: National Export Strategy Consultation. Innovation - An International...Subhrendu Chatterji
Introductory presentation to Ukranian National Export Strategy consultation participants on concepts re developing an export-oriented national innovation system and policies.
The Oslo Manual is the international reference guide for collecting and using data on innovation. In this new 4th edition, published in October 2018, the manual has been updated to take into account a broader range of innovation-related phenomena as well as the experience gained from recent rounds of innovation surveys in OECD countries and partner economies and organisations.
Area of Work: Innovation
Title: Key Factors influencing Countries Innovation
Objectives: Evaluating the Components that contribute to a county’s innovation Performance.
For efficient use of resources in those areas, will help developing countries to emerge on a fast track.
Methodology: Using Regression model (panel data analysis)
Existing and well-functioning regional or national innovation systems designed to support scienceand
technology-based innovation have to be further developed in order to be able to meet new
challenges from emerging global markets for technology and new forms of global knowledgesharing.
Across all countries, governments have recently been involved in research and education;
hence a need for new knowledge and new business skills will also have to be in the focus of
governmental interest. Governments have constantly been called upon to react accordingly and to
adopt innovation-friendly framework conditions. New policy tools have been created to be able to
better meet this challenge.
The regional dimension has also become of increasing significance. Nowadays, regions have come
up with own innovation strategies considering the individual regional strengths instead of spreading
public investments thinly across several frontier technology research fields and, as a consequence,
not making much of an impact.
Innovation policy has to acknowledge that traditional boundaries between manufacturing and
services are increasingly being blurred. The success of manufacturing depends, for instance, very
much on innovative services, such as design, marketing and logistics as well as on product related
after-sales services, and vice versa. More and more service providers are manufacturing goods
that build upon or are related to their service portfolio or distribution channels. But regional and
industrial development policies and tools are still not sufficiently taking account of these changes.
Service innovation is in fact a driver for growth and structural change across the entire economy. It
helps to make the entire economy more productive and provides fuel for innovation in other
industries. It even has the potential to create new growth poles and to lead markets that have a
macro-economic impact.
The so called systematic innovation policy approach, which has recently been introduced in many
industrialised countries, is based on the assumption that an effective innovation policy has to
improve all determinants that influence a given sector-specific innovation system.
The indicator-based Analysis of National Innovation Systems Approach (ANIS), developed by the
Institute for Innovation and Technology (iit Berlin) includes a comprehensive examination and
evaluation of the status of national innovation systems. It is mainly intended for emerging and
developing countries for which standard innovation benchmarking and monitoring approaches
might not be sufficient as statistical data is often missing or outdated. Policy-makers of these
countries can benefit from clear advice on how to overcome weaknesses within their national
innovation system and to identify determinants of specific relevance.
Stimulating Entrepreneurship and Innovative SME’s in A National EconomyBIJFMCF Journal
The study was aimed to explore the innovative and inclusive local entrepreneurship and SME development in Namibia. The study used qualitative methods as a research strategy. Meaning qualitative data was collected and analysed using interpretive techniques through the distribution of google form link to SMEs owner in the 14 region of Namibia. The findings of the study revealed that Namibia SMEs’s owner had no knowledge in SMEs networking with other SMEs in the 14 region. The participants further indicated there is no network platform among SMEs in Namibia that share information regarding SMEs growth and development. According to the participants engaged in the study they indicated that since 1990 some are still operating the same way and there is no partnership with other SMEs in the 14 regions of the country since independence. Therefore, the present study recommends that Ministry of trade should come up with strategies and mechanism that can empower SMEs owner to share business ideas, networking and create partnership with other SMEs in the 14 regions of Namibia and the study further recommends that the Ministry of Trade should come up with SMEs annual conference meeting that would enable SMEs owner to attend and share business ideas and be able to compete at global level.
This Working Paper was published by United Nations University Maastricht Economic and social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). It seeks to provide insights about the main characteristics of innovative firms and to gather new evidence with regard to the nature of the innovation process in the Latin American and Caribbean region. This Paper analyses data from a number of CARICOM countries.
Innovation Ecosystem in Egypt ... Gap analysis and recommendations.
This report was made by the innovation support team at the Science & Technology Development Fund (STDF) in Egypt. The team consists of Eng. Marwa Alaa El-Din, Mohamed Kash, and Dr. Sherif Fahmy
The concept of enterprise innovation goes far outside the once popular but notions are still the backbone of a successful innovation platform, they are only part of a larger process - a process that should always result in measurable business outcomes for your organization. This PPT gives you an overview of Enterprise Innovation, Process innovation, Extent of innovation, Methods for maintaining or increasing the competitiveness for product and process innovations.
The study was aimed to explore the innovative and inclusive local entrepreneurship and SME development in Namibia. The study used qualitative methods as a research strategy. Meaning qualitative data was collected and analysed using interpretive techniques through the distribution of google form link to SMEs owner in the 14 region of Namibia. The findings of the study revealed that Namibia SMEs’s owner had no knowledge in SMEs networking with other SMEs in the 14 region. The participants further indicated there is no network platform among SMEs in Namibia that share information regarding SMEs growth and development. According to the participants engaged in the study they indicated that since 1990 some are still operating the same way and there is no partnership with other SMEs in the 14 regions of the country since independence. Therefore, the present study recommends that Ministry of trade should come up with strategies and mechanism that can empower SMEs owner to share business ideas, networking and create partnership with other SMEs in the 14 regions of Namibia and the study further recommends that the Ministry of Trade should come up with SMEs annual conference meeting that would enable SMEs owner to attend and share business ideas and be able to compete at global level.
What are the user interests behind requests for data and indicators on PPI? C...STIEAS
Expert Workshop on the Measurement of Public Procurement of Innovation. “What are the user interests behind requests for data and indicators on PPI? Can these requirements be clearly identified and delivered? ”, presentation from Ms. Hernández-Garvayo
Esteve almirall esade business school innovation policy -digitalsocialeu
Presentation by Esteve Almirall, Esade Business School, on how policy can support digital social innovation (DSI). Presented at February 3rd 2014 DSI workshop in Brussels.
Exploring the use of signals in the venture emergence of new technology-based...University of Stuttgart
Presentation at 20th ICE Conference – IEEE TMC Europe Conference 23-25 June 2014, Bergamo, Italy.
Abstract: New technology-based firms have to deal with the
technology development and market search challenges at the same time. The venture emergence in technology entrepreneurship symbolizes that the new venture has been able to find the right fit for its technology and becomes an operating business. The complex nature and dynamism of technology markets suggest the need to look beyond the venture resources in order to explain how new ventures overcomes the market uncertainty towards their technological products, and become operational businesses. We use a multiple case study of three new technology-based firms to explore the use of signals as market creation strategies in the context of venture emergence. The results suggest that entrepreneurs rely on market, technology and social capital signaling to reduce the uncertainty and advance towards venture emergence. This research holds implications for researchers interested in further exploring the integration of marketing, signaling and entrepreneurship theories and for entrepreneurs interested in overcoming the market uncertainty towards their technology, products and venture performance.
OECD bibliometric indicators: Selected highlights, April 2024innovationoecd
This document summarizes bibliometric indicators from the OECD based on data from Elsevier's Scopus database. It shows trends in scientific publication output, citation rates, collaboration, and mobility for countries and regions from 2011-2022. It also includes perspectives on artificial intelligence research and research related to long term challenges like environmental science and energy. The data can be explored further using the OECD's STI.Scoreboard platform (https://oe.cd/sti-scoreboard) and OECD Data Explorer (https://data-explorer.oecd.org) bibliometric datasets.
Presentation of the OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023innovationoecd
OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023: Enabling Transitions in Times of Disruption.
Find out more and access the publication at https://www.oecd.org/sti/science-technology-innovation-outlook/
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Analysis of scientific publishing activity: Key findings, December 2021innovationoecd
OECD bibliometric data has been updated and now includes preliminary data for 2020. The indicators are based on Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, Version 5.2021.
Find out more about OECD work on scientometrics and bibliometrics at https://oe.cd/scientometrics
Recommandation du Conseil de l'OCDE sur l'amélioration de l'accès aux données...innovationoecd
Optimiser les bénéfices intersectoriels et transfrontières de l'accès aux données et de leur partage, tout en protégeant les droits des parties prenantes
Recommandation adoptée en octobre 2021. En savoir plus : https://oe.cd/easd21fr
OECD Council Recommendation on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Datainnovationoecd
Maximising the cross-sectoral and cross-border benefits of data access and sharing while protecting the rights of stakeholders
Recommendation adopted in October 2021. Find our more at https://oe.cd/easd21
2020.01.12 OECD STI Outlook launch - Impacts of COVID-19: How STI systems res...innovationoecd
On January 12, join OECD iLibrary, the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation, and ACRL/Choice for a presentation of the key findings from the new STI Outlook, followed by a conversation with OECD STI Director Andrew Wyckoff and RAND Corporation Senior Policy Researcher Marjory Blumenthal about the implications for research and innovation in the US.
Read more at https://oe.cd/STIO21-EES
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity November 2019 event photo bookinnovationoecd
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity: Encouraging Digital Security Innovation, London, 14-15 November 2019. Programme and event information available at oe.cd/gfdsp
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity December 2018 event photo bookinnovationoecd
These photos were taken at the first meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity, held on 13-14 December 2018 in Paris, France. The Global Forum brings together experts and policy makers to foster regular sharing of experiences and good practice on digital security risk and its management, as well as mutual learning and convergence of views on digital security for economic and social prosperity. It is an international multilateral and multidisciplinary setting for all stakeholder communities. Global Forum website: oe.cd/gfdsp
#GFDSP
Participants at the December 2018 event examined the roles and responsibilities of actors for digital security and cybersecurity, with a focus on good practice for the governance of digital security risk in organisations, and improving digital security of technologies throughout their lifecycle.
The event included speakers from:
- Cybersecurity agencies of France (ANSSI), Germany (BSI), Israel (INCD), United States (DHS CISA), Malaysia, European Union (ENISA)
- Ministries from Brazil (Foreign Affairs), France (Foreign Affairs), Germany (Foreign Affairs), Japan (Min. of Economy, Trade and Industry - METI, Min. of Internal Affairs and Communication - MIC), Mexico (Instituto Federal de
Telecomunicaciones), Netherlands (Economic Affairs and Climate Policy), Norway (Min. of Local Government and Modernisation), United Kingdom (Dept. of Culture, Media, and Sports - DCMS), United States (Dept. of Commerce, Dept. of Homeland Security - DHS)
- Business: A.P. Møller – Maersk, Airbus, Deutsche Telekom, Intel, Microsoft, TÜV SÜD, YesWeHack.
- Civil society, Academia, Technical community (incl. CERT Brazil)
- Other organisations: Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA), Digital Infrastructure Netherlands Foundation (DINL), FS-ISAC, Internet Society ISOC & Online Trust Alliance OTA, BEUC, CEPS, BIAC, CSISAC, ITAC
Other key speakers included:
- Angel Gurría, Secretary-General, OECD
- Guillaume Poupard, Director General, Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'Information, ANSSI, France
- Pascal Andrei, Chief Security Officer, Airbus
- Arne Schönbohm, President, Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Germany
- Bruce Schneier, Author
- Marietje Schaake, Member of European Parliament
- Henri Verdier, Ambassador for Digital Affairs, France
- Ambassador Thomas Fitschen, Special Representative for Cyber Foreign Policy and
Cybersecurity, Germany
- Matthew Travis, Deputy Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), United States
- Carlos da Fonseca, Head of the Information Society Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Brazil
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017: Setting the foundations for the digital tr...innovationoecd
The Digital Economy Outlook 2017 shows how Internet infrastructure and usage varies across countries and firms in the OECD area. It looks at policy implications of the digital transformation as well as a wide array of trends. Report available at http://oe.cd/deo2017 - See also the OECD Going Digital project: www.oecd.org/going-digital
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017: Presentation at Global Parliamentary Netwo...innovationoecd
The Digital Economy Outlook 2017 shows how Internet infrastructure and usage varies across countries and firms in the OECD area. It looks at policy implications of the digital transformation as well as a wide array of trends. Report available at http://oe.cd/deo2017
Presentation for the OECD Telecommunication and Broadcasting Review of Mexico...innovationoecd
4 years after Mexico overhauled its telecommunication and broadcasting sectors with a major legal and regulatory reform, a new OECD Review assesses the impact on communication markets, businesses and households. It recommends further measures for the telecommunication and broadcasting sectors to build on this progress and ensure Mexico reaps maximum benefits from the digital transformation. Gabriela Ramos, the OECD Chief of Staff, G20 Sherpa and Special Advisor to the Secretary-General, presented the OECD Telecommunication and Broadcasting Review of México 2017 along with Andrew Wyckoff, Director of Science, Technology and Innovation, OECD, Communications and Transport Minister Gerardo Ruiz Esparza and Federal Telecommunications Institute President Commissioner Gabriel Oswaldo Contreras Saldívar on 31 August 2017 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Mexico City.
Groningen Growth and Development Centre (GGDC) 25th anniversary | 28-30 June ...innovationoecd
Over the years, OECD work on productivity and globalisation has closely mirrored the work of the GGDC on these issues, reflecting considerable cooperation over the past 25 years. Dirk Pilat, Deputy Director of the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation, presented OECD work on productivity and Global value chains - an overview and cooperation with the GGDC.
Techniques to optimize the pagerank algorithm usually fall in two categories. One is to try reducing the work per iteration, and the other is to try reducing the number of iterations. These goals are often at odds with one another. Skipping computation on vertices which have already converged has the potential to save iteration time. Skipping in-identical vertices, with the same in-links, helps reduce duplicate computations and thus could help reduce iteration time. Road networks often have chains which can be short-circuited before pagerank computation to improve performance. Final ranks of chain nodes can be easily calculated. This could reduce both the iteration time, and the number of iterations. If a graph has no dangling nodes, pagerank of each strongly connected component can be computed in topological order. This could help reduce the iteration time, no. of iterations, and also enable multi-iteration concurrency in pagerank computation. The combination of all of the above methods is the STICD algorithm. [sticd] For dynamic graphs, unchanged components whose ranks are unaffected can be skipped altogether.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Explore our comprehensive data analysis project presentation on predicting product ad campaign performance. Learn how data-driven insights can optimize your marketing strategies and enhance campaign effectiveness. Perfect for professionals and students looking to understand the power of data analysis in advertising. for more details visit: https://bostoninstituteofanalytics.org/data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/
Predicting Product Ad Campaign Performance: A Data Analysis Project Presentation
Charmes - Measuring innovation in the informal economy, formulating an agenda
1. Measuring Innovation in the Informal
Economy -
Formulating an Agenda
Jacques Charmes
Scientific Research Institute for Development (IRD), Marseille, France
Fred Gault
UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, the Netherlands
and the Tshwane University of Technology (TUT)
Institute for Economic Research on Innovation (IERI), Tshwane, South Africa
Sacha Wunsch-Vincent
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Geneva, Switzerland
Capturing hidden innovators
2. The Informal Economy in Developing Nations:
Hidden Engine of Innovation ?
Despite the importance of the IE, little is known about how new
processes, products, and other innovations are generated and
monetized in the IE.
Three core questions
1. How does innovation occur in the IE, how is it diffused, who
are its actors and what are innovation impacts?
2. How do inventors in the IE reap the benefits of their
innovations? What forms of appropriation are in use?
3. What are suggested policy recommendations to improve
innovation impacts in the informal economy?
3. Contribution of Project on Innovation in the Informal
Economy of WIPO and the Institute for Economic
Research on Innovation, Tshwane, South Africa
1. Opening a window to an important facet of
innovation which has not been explored before
■ the first set of cross-country comprehensive studies
into innovation in the informal sector
■ bringing hitherto separated experts of the informal
economy, innovation and IP together
1. Supporting the innovation measurement agenda
groundwork for future empirical work
1. Contributing to a new stream of policy-making –
innovation policies to cater to the IE
4. Innovation happens everywhere, in the formal and the
informal economy, in private or public institutions, and
in households and communities
For the formal business sector successive editions of
the Oslo Manual (OECD 1992, OECD/Eurostat 1997,
2005) have guided the measurement of innovation for
over twenty years and the most widely used survey is
the European Union (EU) Community Innovation
Survey (CIS)
5. Three approaches for measuring and
understanding innovation in the informal sector
The first is the adaptation, for use in the informal sector, of
questions and analytical techniques from surveys, and
their definitions, used to measure innovation in the
business sector of the formal economy
The second is the adding of a few innovation questions,
or a survey module, to existing surveys on the informal
economy which combine labour force surveys with
establishment surveys of activities in the informal sector
The third is the conducting of interview-based studies and
the use of ad hoc questionnaires in sub-sectors of the
informal sector.
6. The contribution of the paper lies in the novel combination
of tested approaches in informal sector surveys, on the
one hand, and innovation surveys in the formal sector, on
the other hand.
Two viable scenarios emerge: (i) adding a couple of
innovation questions to existing large-scale surveys of the
informal economy and/or (ii) conducting ad hoc
questionnaire- and interview-based sectoral studies in
selected countries
8. Community Innovation Survey 2012
(1) General information about the enterprise
(2) Product (good or service) innovation (3) Process innovation
(4) Ongoing or abandoned innovation activities for product and
process innovations
(5) Activities and expenditures for product and process
innovations
(6) Sources of information and cooperation for product and
process innovation
(7) Competitiveness of enterprise’s product and process
innovations
(8) Organizational innovation (9) Marketing innovation
(10) Public sector procurement and innovation
(11) Strategies and obstacles for reaching enterprise’s goals
9. Measuring Innovation in the Formal Sector
and Applicability to the Informal Sector
To date, national innovation surveys have been carried
out by 95 countries,15 of them in sub-Saharan Africa, plus
4 in Northern Africa
In Africa these surveys are mostly the result of the work
on the African Science, Technology and Innovation
Indicators (ASTII) program by NEPAD (The New
Partnership For Africa’s Development), with involvement
from the African Observatory of Science and Technology
Innovation (AOSTI)
10. Measuring Innovation in the Formal Sector
and Applicability to the Informal Sector
The ASTII innovation surveys follow the guidelines of the
Oslo Manual and are based on the above-mentioned CIS
The areas of enquiry are
(i) product innovation, (ii) process innovation,
(iii) ongoing or abandoned innovation activities,
innovation activities and expenditure,
(iv) sources of information and cooperation for innovation
activities,
(v) effects of innovation during the last two years,
(vi) factors hampering innovation activities,
(vii) intellectual property rights and
(viii) organization and marketing innovations.
11. Measuring Innovation in the Formal Sector
and Applicability to the Informal Sector
We do not regard extending the large-scale innovation surveys
to the informal economy as a viable option
However, it is still necessary to consider whether the
definitions and questions in formal sector innovation surveys
might offer any lessons or templates for surveying the IE
Many of the questions in the CIS-like surveys used now in
Africa in the formal sector are appropriate in the informal sector
Adaptations are necessary when enquiring about “linkages
between the informal and the formal sector”, “learning by
imitation of the formal sector” or “innovation co-operation
partners
The ways of learning by doing that prevail in the informal
sector and the forms of apprenticeship also need to be
reflected in the survey.
12. Measurement of the Informal Sector to Date
and Scope for Introducing Innovation
Survey Questions
4 types of surveys
Establishments censuses and surveys
Household surveys
Mixed household/establishement surveys
Combined household and establishments surveys
44.5 percent of African countries have carried out a mixed
or a combined informal sector survey in recent years and
another 29.6 percent have implemented an informal sector
survey of small establishments.
13. Measurement of the Informal Sector to Date
and Scope for Introducing Innovation
Survey Questions
The major objectives of the mixed/combined/establishment
surveys are to collect data on employment and production for
labor force statistics and the compilation of national accounts.
The questionnaires are designed to assess the performance
of informal micro-enterprises in terms of employment creation
(characteristics of workers and of jobs) and generation of
output, value added, production costs, entrepreneurs’ income
and also – less systematically – capital formation and assets
These surveys also produce information about the constraints
confronting informal sector operators and the solutions that
they adopt
Is Innovation Covered in Existing Informal Sector Surveys? If
so, how?
14. Assessment of Informal Sector
Innovation via Qualitative, Structured
Interviews and Questionnaires
15. Personal interviews using semi-structured questionnaires are
often the only way of securing high-quality survey replies,
especially from respondents in remote locations.
This method might also be better in contributing to our
understanding of how innovation happens in the informal
economy, where ideas from innovation come from, how skills
are acquired, how the benefits are appropriated, and what the
economic and social context and outcomes of the innovation
are.
The approach allows for a mixture of open-ended and closed
questions to allow them to capture unexpected phenomena and
personal experiences that would inform the study .
16. Three main non-probability sampling techniques are often used
separately or together to make the sample more representative,
namely (i) purposive, (ii) snowball also called the chain referral
sampling method and (iii) quota sampling methods
In parallel, the following entities are also surveyed: (i) formal
companies supplying informal manufacturers, including contract
manufacturers; (ii) the customers of the IE entity, which often
play an important role as source of knowledge, (iii) government
and regulatory bodies, (iv) intermediary organizations engaged
in knowledge transfer, (v) associations representing the
informal cluster (e.g. the jua kali association), (v) NGOs working
to promote innovation and the understanding of IP in the
informal sector, and finally, (vi) agencies providing training and
skills.
17. The questionnaire covers
(i) the level and nature of innovation activities, including with
questions relating to imitation and adaptation versus
originality (“Is this product your original design?”),
(ii) sources of information and knowledge,
(iii) innovation partners and collaborators, with a focus on
useful network and linkages,
(iv) innovation endowment and capacity in terms of skills,
apprenticeships, teaching and learning (“Where did you
learn the process of making the product from?”),
(v) obstacles to innovation,
(vi) support measures and the role of the national or local
governmental authorities, and finally
(vii) the role of various methods to appropriate innovation
investments such as lead time, secrecy and formal IP rights
18. Significant attention is then spent on apprenticeships and on-
the-job or other training, and the supply and diffusion of skills, for
example:
“Where have you learnt your craft?
What is the relationship with your trainer?
Do you provide training on production processes?”
A number of questions try to disentangle the possible shared
sources of knowledge in the cluster, such as
“Are your products based to some extent on indigenous
and/or traditional knowledge?”
Portability of skills and knowledge from one job to another is
also an area of enquiry
“When you move jobs, do you keep or share the secrets of
production from your previous employer?”
19. The topic of knowledge flows and collaboration in the cluster,
and reasons for and against it, is also surveyed intensively. A
number of questions are particularly concerned with the
determinants of cooperation, for example underlying personal
relationships such as family ties or friendships, or factors
which relate to geographical proximity or belonging to the
same association, cluster, community or another social or
professional group. Care is applied when surveying
collaboration among the different potential partners (e.g.
suppliers, producers and customers). The role of private or
government associations as a source of information and
knowledge is surveyed.
20. To conclude, significant portions of the interviews are also
dedicated to the different methods which informal sector
participants might use to appropriate their innovation efforts,
ranging from lead time and secrecy to more formal IP rights,
for example:
“What mechanisms do you use to protect your innovation
or innovative ideas?
Are you concerned with possible commercialization of your
innovations without your knowledge or consent?
What forms of appropriation are most appropriate for your
sector (list of options indicated)?”
21. it could be argued that the experience and results generated
from these surveys are a necessary stepping-stone toward
better formulating and deploying large-scale formal innovation
surveys as well.
23. Key place in this work for the AUC African Observatory of
Science, Technology and Innovation (AOSTI) and the
AU/NEPAD African Science and Technology Innovation
Indicators (ASTII) initiative, both of which are established
organisations.
Surveys, as just described, require standard concepts and
definition and this study comes at a time when the Oslo Manual
is being revised. The revised manual, or the work being
undertaken as part of the revision, could go beyond the present
business sector focus to consider innovation in other sectors in
the System of National Accounts (EC et al. 2009) such as the
public sector and the household sector
24. Further work should be encouraged to develop a core set of
innovation-related survey questions, some from Eurostat’s
CIS and some from the informal sector surveys that we have
described. In Africa, this work could be supported by AOSTI
and AU/NEPAD.
At the outset, a short set of questions could be suggested to
the stakeholders of the mixed surveys, if they were convinced
of the value of such an approach for the understanding of the
dynamics of the informal sector in Africa. Stakeholders might,
for example, include Afristat, Eurostat and Paris21, and the
ILO.
25. But the better approach is combined surveys. To this end, the
stakeholders to be approached are the departments of
economic statistics within the national statistical offices and
the African Centre of Statistics at UNECA, and also
employers’ associations in certain countries which are
sometimes involved in the design and implementation of such
surveys (for instance in Nigeria).
After experience is gained, a standardized AU survey of
informal economy activities, including innovation and IPR use,
could be considered. The theme could be picked up in future
editions of the African Innovation Outlook.
26. In the meantime, the second option of more ad hoc
questionnaire- and interview-based surveys in selected
countries is the more promising one. Studies and results can
be obtained more quickly, and sector studies based on more
qualitative work could be more effective in helping develop a
rich understanding of innovation in the informal sector. In turn,
this will also help formulate better questions to be included in
systematic large-scale surveys as developed
27. CUP Book: The Informal Economy in
Developing Nations: Hidden Engine of Innovation ?