This document provides an overview of educational administration in American school systems. It discusses the administrative hierarchy from school boards down to building principals. Key points covered include the roles of superintendents as CEOs of school districts, principals as instructional leaders and building managers, and school boards in establishing policies. The roles and responsibilities of various administrative positions are summarized.
Department of Education (RA 9155), DepEd Set Up, Educational Delivery Program...Mark Anthony Soratos
The document summarizes the organizational structure and history of the Philippine education system. It discusses that the Department of Education (DepEd) was established by law in 2001 (RA 9155) to govern basic education. It outlines the educational programs from pre-school to secondary levels and the implementing rules and regulations that define the roles of different administrative offices within DepEd. It also notes recent developments like the K-12 program and efforts to improve library and alternative learning resources.
The document outlines the organizational structure of the Philippine Department of Education from the central office down to the school level. It describes the key offices and their responsibilities at each level, including the central office under the Secretary of Education, the regional offices under Regional Directors, and schools divisions under Division Superintendents. Schools divisions may be further divided into school districts overseen by District Supervisors. The structures are designed to decentralize operations while maintaining accountability and relevance according to national education policies and learner needs.
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of a school principal. It outlines 12 key responsibilities:
1. Setting the vision, mission, goals and objectives of the school to provide quality basic education.
2. Creating an environment conducive to teaching and learning, with factors like a guaranteed curriculum, safety, and professional collaboration.
3. Implementing, monitoring and assessing the school curriculum and being accountable for learning outcomes.
4. Developing the school education program and improvement plan to provide direction and prepare for changes.
5. Offering equitable educational programs and services to all learners in the community.
6. Introducing innovative instructional modes to achieve higher learning outcomes.
Department of Education (Philippines) School Governing Council (SGC) Orientation and Conference. SGC Legal Basis, Roles, Duties and Responsibilities and Functions. Basic Concepts of the SGC: Shared Accountability, Shared Commitment, and Shared Responsibility.
SGC Stakeholders: Internal and External Stakeholders
This document summarizes key aspects of Republic Act No. 9155, which establishes a framework for governance of basic education in the Philippines. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education, and gives the department authority over basic education policy, planning, standards, and outcomes assessment. The act defines terms related to basic education and establishes principles of shared governance between national, regional, and local levels. It outlines the powers and duties of the Secretary of Education and regional education directors to implement basic education.
The document outlines the organizational structure of a school or city division. At the top is the Office of the Regional Director, followed by the Schools Division Superintendent and Assistant Schools Division Superintendent who oversee administrative duties and promotional staff that carry out programs, projects and services at the local level to fit needs.
This document summarizes key provisions of Batas Pambansa Bilang 232, a Philippine law establishing an integrated education system. It outlines the law's declaration of basic policy and objectives to promote a complete education system and cultural communities' right to develop. It describes rights of parents, students, teachers and schools. It discusses duties of parents, students and teachers as well as school administrators' obligations. It also covers the education system's formal levels, specialized services, school establishment and organization, and financing assistance.
The document outlines the authority structure of Saskatchewan schools from the provincial government down to individual teachers. It begins with the provincial government department of education and describes the roles of school boards, school community councils, principals, vice-principals, department heads, and teachers. Key responsibilities at each level are summarized, such as the province establishing education policy and school boards overseeing local operations.
Department of Education (RA 9155), DepEd Set Up, Educational Delivery Program...Mark Anthony Soratos
The document summarizes the organizational structure and history of the Philippine education system. It discusses that the Department of Education (DepEd) was established by law in 2001 (RA 9155) to govern basic education. It outlines the educational programs from pre-school to secondary levels and the implementing rules and regulations that define the roles of different administrative offices within DepEd. It also notes recent developments like the K-12 program and efforts to improve library and alternative learning resources.
The document outlines the organizational structure of the Philippine Department of Education from the central office down to the school level. It describes the key offices and their responsibilities at each level, including the central office under the Secretary of Education, the regional offices under Regional Directors, and schools divisions under Division Superintendents. Schools divisions may be further divided into school districts overseen by District Supervisors. The structures are designed to decentralize operations while maintaining accountability and relevance according to national education policies and learner needs.
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of a school principal. It outlines 12 key responsibilities:
1. Setting the vision, mission, goals and objectives of the school to provide quality basic education.
2. Creating an environment conducive to teaching and learning, with factors like a guaranteed curriculum, safety, and professional collaboration.
3. Implementing, monitoring and assessing the school curriculum and being accountable for learning outcomes.
4. Developing the school education program and improvement plan to provide direction and prepare for changes.
5. Offering equitable educational programs and services to all learners in the community.
6. Introducing innovative instructional modes to achieve higher learning outcomes.
Department of Education (Philippines) School Governing Council (SGC) Orientation and Conference. SGC Legal Basis, Roles, Duties and Responsibilities and Functions. Basic Concepts of the SGC: Shared Accountability, Shared Commitment, and Shared Responsibility.
SGC Stakeholders: Internal and External Stakeholders
This document summarizes key aspects of Republic Act No. 9155, which establishes a framework for governance of basic education in the Philippines. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education, and gives the department authority over basic education policy, planning, standards, and outcomes assessment. The act defines terms related to basic education and establishes principles of shared governance between national, regional, and local levels. It outlines the powers and duties of the Secretary of Education and regional education directors to implement basic education.
The document outlines the organizational structure of a school or city division. At the top is the Office of the Regional Director, followed by the Schools Division Superintendent and Assistant Schools Division Superintendent who oversee administrative duties and promotional staff that carry out programs, projects and services at the local level to fit needs.
This document summarizes key provisions of Batas Pambansa Bilang 232, a Philippine law establishing an integrated education system. It outlines the law's declaration of basic policy and objectives to promote a complete education system and cultural communities' right to develop. It describes rights of parents, students, teachers and schools. It discusses duties of parents, students and teachers as well as school administrators' obligations. It also covers the education system's formal levels, specialized services, school establishment and organization, and financing assistance.
The document outlines the authority structure of Saskatchewan schools from the provincial government down to individual teachers. It begins with the provincial government department of education and describes the roles of school boards, school community councils, principals, vice-principals, department heads, and teachers. Key responsibilities at each level are summarized, such as the province establishing education policy and school boards overseeing local operations.
DepEd Order No. 47 s. 2014: CONSTITUTION AND BY - LAWS OF THE SUPREME PUPIL G...Jared Ram Juezan
DepEd Order No. 47 s. 2014: CONSTITUTION AND BY - LAWS OF THE SUPREME PUPIL GOVERNMENT AND SUPREME STUDENT GOVERNMENT IN ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL
This document outlines Republic Act No. 9155, which establishes a framework for governance in basic education in the Philippines. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education. It defines the roles and responsibilities of officials at the national, regional, division, district, and school levels to decentralize governance and empower local authorities. The act aims to promote access to quality basic education for all citizens.
This document outlines the framework for governance of basic education in the Philippines according to Republic Act No. 9155. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education, and defines the roles and responsibilities at the national, regional, division, district, and school levels. Key points include establishing shared governance and accountability across all levels, defining terms related to basic education, and transferring cultural agencies to focus the department solely on education.
This document establishes a framework for governance of basic education in the country. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education and defines the roles and responsibilities within the education system. The goals are to provide skills, knowledge and values to students to become productive citizens and establish authority and accountability. It outlines the national, regional, and school level offices and their respective powers, duties and functions.
The document outlines the components, aims, and levels of education in a curriculum. It discusses the aims of primary, secondary, and tertiary education. The primary level aims to provide essential knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values for personal development and contributing to society. The secondary level continues the primary aims and discovers student aptitudes and interests to equip them for further education or productive work. The tertiary level provides general education programs while training professionals, advancing knowledge, and applying research to improve life.
1. The document establishes the governance framework for basic education in the Philippines by defining the roles and responsibilities of the national, regional, and divisional levels of the Department of Education.
2. At the national level, the Secretary of Education is responsible for formulating policies, plans, and standards and monitoring national learning outcomes.
3. Regional offices are responsible for developing regional plans and standards in line with national frameworks as well as research, projects, and resource management.
4. Divisions oversee schools and learning centers, personnel, and implementation of education plans, standards, and resource allocation at the local level.
The document discusses the role and functions of school governing councils, including determining school policies, developing and monitoring the school improvement plan, and managing council resources. It provides examples of council compositions and codes of conduct. The document also covers operating procedures for councils, such as meeting requirements, and evaluating council operations through a focus on outcomes and processes.
AN ACT INSTITUTING A FRAME WORK OF GOVERNANCE FOR BASIC EDUCATION, ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY, RENAMING THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORTS AS THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Department of Education (DepEd) Management Structurelouie2017
The Department of Education (DepEd) is the main agency tasked with managing basic education in the Philippines. It has a centralized management structure with offices at the national, regional, division, district, and school levels. At the national level, the Secretary oversees all DepEd operations with the help of Undersecretaries and Assistant Secretaries. Regions are administered by Regional Directors. The DepEd structure aims to uniformly deliver education services while allowing for regional and local flexibility.
The document outlines the governance structure and principles of the Philippine Department of Education (DepEd) based on Republic Act No. 9155. It establishes DepEd as the sole government agency responsible for governing basic education. DepEd is organized into a central office that oversees national administration and field offices that handle regional and local coordination. The act also transfers cultural agencies to DepEd and abolishes the Bureau of Physical Education and School Sports, transferring its functions to another commission.
This document outlines the new organizational structures of DepEd's Central Office, Regional Offices, and Schools Division Offices. It details the offices and bureaus under the Central Office and describes their functions in education policy, planning, curriculum, assessment, and operations. It also outlines the divisions and services under the Regional and Schools Division Offices and their roles in supporting the delivery of basic education programs and resources. The restructuring aims to establish clear mandates and improve governance in DepEd.
The document outlines several project proposals from the Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (ESP) Club at Pedro Guevara Memorial National High School. The proposals include electing new ESP Club officers, holding symposiums on character education topics, talent shows to promote student excellence, logo design and photo contests, and an outdoor daycamp to facilitate character building among youth through experiential learning. The ESP Club aims to teach students moral values and ethics using both curricular and extracurricular activities.
This document outlines the revised constitution and by-laws for Supreme Student Governments in secondary schools in the Philippines as ordered by DepEd. It details the objectives to strengthen and standardize student governments, and harness them as partners in education. It then outlines the 20 articles establishing the student government, including its name and location, principles, membership, students' rights and duties, powers and duties of the government, composition and elections, and duties of officers. It aims to provide structure and guidelines for secondary school student governments nationwide.
Brown, sidney is the high school principal the single agent of dropout preven...William Kritsonis
This study analyzed dropout rate data from two inner-city high schools in North Alabama between 1990 and 2007 to determine if a change in school leadership affected dropout rates. The analysis found that both schools saw a significant difference in dropout rates after experiencing a change in principal. Specifically, one school's dropout rate declined from 31.74% to 21.38% after two changes in leadership over four years. The other school saw its dropout rate drop from 18.45% to 3% following a change in principal. The results suggest that while the principal is not the sole agent for dropout prevention, the principal does have a significant impact, estimated to be around 30%, on dropout and graduation rates.
Dr. Kritsonis Honored as Professor, Scholar & Pioneer Publisher
The Texas National Association for Multicultural Education honored Dr. William Allan Kritsonis as a Professor, Scholar, and Pioneer Publisher for Distinguished Service to Multicultural Research Publishing. The ceremony was on April 28th 2012 at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
This document provides an overview of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder. It discusses the historical conceptualizations and diagnostic criteria of the disorder. Prevalence is estimated at 1% of the general population but many cases remain undiagnosed for years. The article reviews theoretical explanations, assessment considerations including common symptoms, and treatment modalities like cognitive therapy and art therapy. It aims to increase awareness and understanding of this complex disorder.
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts - Article by William Allan Kritsonis...William Kritsonis
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts - Article by William Allan Kritsonis, PhD. Dr. Kritsonis is an international expert in the publishing industry.
Books – Articles – Lectures - Workshops
Dr. Kritsonis lectures and conducts seminars and workshops on a variety of topics. He is author of more than 600 articles in professional journals and several books. His popular book SCHOOL DISCIPLINE: The Art of Survival is scheduled for its fourth edition. He is the author of the textbook William Kritsonis, PhD on Schooling that is used by many professors at colleges and universities throughout the nation and abroad.
In 2008, Dr. Kritsonis coauthored the textbook A Statistical Journey: Taming of the Skew. The book has been adopted by professors in many colleges and universities throughout the nation. It was published by the Alexis/Austin Group, Murrieta, California.
In 2007, Dr. Kritsonis’ version of the book of Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (858 pages) was published in the United States of America in cooperation with partial financial support of Visiting Lecturers, Oxford Round Table (2005). The book is the product of a collaborative twenty-four year effort started in 1978 with the late Dr. Philip H. Phenix. Dr. Kritsonis was in continuous communication with Dr. Phenix until his death in 2002.
In 2007, Dr. Kritsonis was the lead author of the textbook Practical Applications of Educational Research and Basic Statistics. The text provides practical content knowledge in research for graduate students at the doctoral and master’s levels.
In 2009, Dr. Kritsonis’ book Non-Renewal of Public School Personnel Contracts: Selected Supreme and District Court Decisions in Accordance with the Due Process of Law was accepted for publication by The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York.
Dr. Kritsonis’ seminar and workshop on Writing for Professional Publication has been very popular with both professors and practitioners. Persons in attendance generate an article to be published in a refereed journal at the national or international levels.
Dr. Kritsonis has traveled and lectured throughout the United States and world-wide. Some recent international tours include Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania, Turkey, Italy, Greece, Monte Carlo, England, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Estonia, Poland, Germany, and many more.
S T U D E N T A T T E N D A N C E A N D I N S T R U C T I O N A L P R O G...William Kritsonis
The document discusses several important laws and court cases related to student attendance and education programs. It mentions that children ages 5 to 20 are eligible for free public school tuition in Texas. It also summarizes key education-related court cases like Brown v. Board of Education which ruled that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional. The document also lists several Texas education codes covering compulsory attendance ages, kindergarten requirements, and penalties for truancy. It indicates residents and guardianship scenarios administrators should be familiar with.
The document summarizes the book "Our Iceberg is Melting" which tells the story of a colony of penguins whose iceberg home is cracking and melting. A penguin named Fred notices the cracks and works with other penguins to address the problem. They realize migration is the best solution. The document discusses how the book demonstrates the eight steps of successfully managing change and could be used as a tool to create positive change in an educational setting. It describes how the author and colleagues conducted a book study and presented ideas to faculty to help establish a new culture with successful change implementation.
DepEd Order No. 47 s. 2014: CONSTITUTION AND BY - LAWS OF THE SUPREME PUPIL G...Jared Ram Juezan
DepEd Order No. 47 s. 2014: CONSTITUTION AND BY - LAWS OF THE SUPREME PUPIL GOVERNMENT AND SUPREME STUDENT GOVERNMENT IN ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL
This document outlines Republic Act No. 9155, which establishes a framework for governance in basic education in the Philippines. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education. It defines the roles and responsibilities of officials at the national, regional, division, district, and school levels to decentralize governance and empower local authorities. The act aims to promote access to quality basic education for all citizens.
This document outlines the framework for governance of basic education in the Philippines according to Republic Act No. 9155. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education, and defines the roles and responsibilities at the national, regional, division, district, and school levels. Key points include establishing shared governance and accountability across all levels, defining terms related to basic education, and transferring cultural agencies to focus the department solely on education.
This document establishes a framework for governance of basic education in the country. It renames the Department of Education, Culture and Sports to the Department of Education and defines the roles and responsibilities within the education system. The goals are to provide skills, knowledge and values to students to become productive citizens and establish authority and accountability. It outlines the national, regional, and school level offices and their respective powers, duties and functions.
The document outlines the components, aims, and levels of education in a curriculum. It discusses the aims of primary, secondary, and tertiary education. The primary level aims to provide essential knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values for personal development and contributing to society. The secondary level continues the primary aims and discovers student aptitudes and interests to equip them for further education or productive work. The tertiary level provides general education programs while training professionals, advancing knowledge, and applying research to improve life.
1. The document establishes the governance framework for basic education in the Philippines by defining the roles and responsibilities of the national, regional, and divisional levels of the Department of Education.
2. At the national level, the Secretary of Education is responsible for formulating policies, plans, and standards and monitoring national learning outcomes.
3. Regional offices are responsible for developing regional plans and standards in line with national frameworks as well as research, projects, and resource management.
4. Divisions oversee schools and learning centers, personnel, and implementation of education plans, standards, and resource allocation at the local level.
The document discusses the role and functions of school governing councils, including determining school policies, developing and monitoring the school improvement plan, and managing council resources. It provides examples of council compositions and codes of conduct. The document also covers operating procedures for councils, such as meeting requirements, and evaluating council operations through a focus on outcomes and processes.
AN ACT INSTITUTING A FRAME WORK OF GOVERNANCE FOR BASIC EDUCATION, ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY, RENAMING THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORTS AS THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Department of Education (DepEd) Management Structurelouie2017
The Department of Education (DepEd) is the main agency tasked with managing basic education in the Philippines. It has a centralized management structure with offices at the national, regional, division, district, and school levels. At the national level, the Secretary oversees all DepEd operations with the help of Undersecretaries and Assistant Secretaries. Regions are administered by Regional Directors. The DepEd structure aims to uniformly deliver education services while allowing for regional and local flexibility.
The document outlines the governance structure and principles of the Philippine Department of Education (DepEd) based on Republic Act No. 9155. It establishes DepEd as the sole government agency responsible for governing basic education. DepEd is organized into a central office that oversees national administration and field offices that handle regional and local coordination. The act also transfers cultural agencies to DepEd and abolishes the Bureau of Physical Education and School Sports, transferring its functions to another commission.
This document outlines the new organizational structures of DepEd's Central Office, Regional Offices, and Schools Division Offices. It details the offices and bureaus under the Central Office and describes their functions in education policy, planning, curriculum, assessment, and operations. It also outlines the divisions and services under the Regional and Schools Division Offices and their roles in supporting the delivery of basic education programs and resources. The restructuring aims to establish clear mandates and improve governance in DepEd.
The document outlines several project proposals from the Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (ESP) Club at Pedro Guevara Memorial National High School. The proposals include electing new ESP Club officers, holding symposiums on character education topics, talent shows to promote student excellence, logo design and photo contests, and an outdoor daycamp to facilitate character building among youth through experiential learning. The ESP Club aims to teach students moral values and ethics using both curricular and extracurricular activities.
This document outlines the revised constitution and by-laws for Supreme Student Governments in secondary schools in the Philippines as ordered by DepEd. It details the objectives to strengthen and standardize student governments, and harness them as partners in education. It then outlines the 20 articles establishing the student government, including its name and location, principles, membership, students' rights and duties, powers and duties of the government, composition and elections, and duties of officers. It aims to provide structure and guidelines for secondary school student governments nationwide.
Brown, sidney is the high school principal the single agent of dropout preven...William Kritsonis
This study analyzed dropout rate data from two inner-city high schools in North Alabama between 1990 and 2007 to determine if a change in school leadership affected dropout rates. The analysis found that both schools saw a significant difference in dropout rates after experiencing a change in principal. Specifically, one school's dropout rate declined from 31.74% to 21.38% after two changes in leadership over four years. The other school saw its dropout rate drop from 18.45% to 3% following a change in principal. The results suggest that while the principal is not the sole agent for dropout prevention, the principal does have a significant impact, estimated to be around 30%, on dropout and graduation rates.
Dr. Kritsonis Honored as Professor, Scholar & Pioneer Publisher
The Texas National Association for Multicultural Education honored Dr. William Allan Kritsonis as a Professor, Scholar, and Pioneer Publisher for Distinguished Service to Multicultural Research Publishing. The ceremony was on April 28th 2012 at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
This document provides an overview of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder. It discusses the historical conceptualizations and diagnostic criteria of the disorder. Prevalence is estimated at 1% of the general population but many cases remain undiagnosed for years. The article reviews theoretical explanations, assessment considerations including common symptoms, and treatment modalities like cognitive therapy and art therapy. It aims to increase awareness and understanding of this complex disorder.
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts - Article by William Allan Kritsonis...William Kritsonis
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts - Article by William Allan Kritsonis, PhD. Dr. Kritsonis is an international expert in the publishing industry.
Books – Articles – Lectures - Workshops
Dr. Kritsonis lectures and conducts seminars and workshops on a variety of topics. He is author of more than 600 articles in professional journals and several books. His popular book SCHOOL DISCIPLINE: The Art of Survival is scheduled for its fourth edition. He is the author of the textbook William Kritsonis, PhD on Schooling that is used by many professors at colleges and universities throughout the nation and abroad.
In 2008, Dr. Kritsonis coauthored the textbook A Statistical Journey: Taming of the Skew. The book has been adopted by professors in many colleges and universities throughout the nation. It was published by the Alexis/Austin Group, Murrieta, California.
In 2007, Dr. Kritsonis’ version of the book of Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (858 pages) was published in the United States of America in cooperation with partial financial support of Visiting Lecturers, Oxford Round Table (2005). The book is the product of a collaborative twenty-four year effort started in 1978 with the late Dr. Philip H. Phenix. Dr. Kritsonis was in continuous communication with Dr. Phenix until his death in 2002.
In 2007, Dr. Kritsonis was the lead author of the textbook Practical Applications of Educational Research and Basic Statistics. The text provides practical content knowledge in research for graduate students at the doctoral and master’s levels.
In 2009, Dr. Kritsonis’ book Non-Renewal of Public School Personnel Contracts: Selected Supreme and District Court Decisions in Accordance with the Due Process of Law was accepted for publication by The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York.
Dr. Kritsonis’ seminar and workshop on Writing for Professional Publication has been very popular with both professors and practitioners. Persons in attendance generate an article to be published in a refereed journal at the national or international levels.
Dr. Kritsonis has traveled and lectured throughout the United States and world-wide. Some recent international tours include Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania, Turkey, Italy, Greece, Monte Carlo, England, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Estonia, Poland, Germany, and many more.
S T U D E N T A T T E N D A N C E A N D I N S T R U C T I O N A L P R O G...William Kritsonis
The document discusses several important laws and court cases related to student attendance and education programs. It mentions that children ages 5 to 20 are eligible for free public school tuition in Texas. It also summarizes key education-related court cases like Brown v. Board of Education which ruled that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional. The document also lists several Texas education codes covering compulsory attendance ages, kindergarten requirements, and penalties for truancy. It indicates residents and guardianship scenarios administrators should be familiar with.
The document summarizes the book "Our Iceberg is Melting" which tells the story of a colony of penguins whose iceberg home is cracking and melting. A penguin named Fred notices the cracks and works with other penguins to address the problem. They realize migration is the best solution. The document discusses how the book demonstrates the eight steps of successfully managing change and could be used as a tool to create positive change in an educational setting. It describes how the author and colleagues conducted a book study and presented ideas to faculty to help establish a new culture with successful change implementation.
Dr. LaVelle Hendricks - NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS - www.nationalforum.comWilliam Kritsonis
The article discusses male sexual addiction, examining its signs and symptoms, potential causes, and treatment options. Sexual addiction exhibits characteristics similar to drug and alcohol addictions, such as an inability to stop behaviors despite negative consequences. While some claim to be addicted to sex, it has been slow to be recognized as an official diagnosis. However, the APA is considering including it in future versions of the DSM. Effective treatment requires admitting there is a problem and typically involves medication, counseling, and education on developing healthy sexuality.
The American Judicial System by Dr. Fred C. LunenburgWilliam Kritsonis
The document discusses the American judicial system, which consists of federal and state courts. The federal court system is based on the US Constitution and includes district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court. State court systems are based on state constitutions and laws and generally include courts of limited jurisdiction, courts of general jurisdiction, intermediate appellate courts, and a state supreme court. Both federal and state courts have played an important role in interpreting laws relating to schools.
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Public School Law, School Law, School Legal Issues, Educational Laws & Policies
Professorial Roles
Dr. Kritsonis has served in professorial roles at Central Washington University, Washington; Salisbury State University, Maryland; Northwestern State University, Louisiana; McNeese State University, Louisiana; and Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge in the Department of Administrative and Foundational Services.
In 2006, Dr. Kritsonis published two articles in the Two-Volume Set of the Encyclopedia of Educational Leadership and Administration published by SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. He is a National Reviewer for the Journal of Research on Leadership, University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA).
In 2007, Dr. Kritsonis was invited to write a history and philosophy of education for the ABC-CLIO Encyclopedia of World History.
Currently, Dr. Kritsonis is Professor of Educational Leadership at Prairie View A&M University – Member of the Texas A&M University System. He teaches in the PhD Program in Educational Leadership. Dr. Kritsonis taught the Inaugural class session in the doctoral program at the start of the fall 2004 academic year. In October 2006, Dr. Kritsonis chaired the first doctoral student to earn a PhD in Educational Leadership at Prairie View A&M University. He has chaired over 18 doctoral dissertations. He lives in Houston, Texas
Lunenburg, fred c[1]. state mandated performance testing schooling v1 n1 2010William Kritsonis
The document discusses legislation and litigation surrounding state-mandated performance testing. It begins by outlining how states have laws requiring statewide testing and use test scores to determine graduation eligibility. While courts generally defer to state testing policies, litigation can occur if tests are found to lack validity or discriminate against certain groups. The document examines a seminal court case on testing and discusses how subsequent cases have addressed issues like testing accommodations and participation in graduation ceremonies. In conclusion, the author predicts continued statewide testing along with further litigation, and recommends steps states can take to minimize legal challenges to their testing programs.
William Allan Kritsonis is a professor of educational leadership at Prairie View A&M University. He has over 40 years of experience in education, including serving as a visiting scholar at Stanford and Columbia Universities. He has chaired over 20 doctoral dissertations. His research focuses on educational leadership, research methods, and multicultural education. He is the founder of National FORUM Journals, which has published over 5,000 professors. His goals for 2012 are to teach and mentor students while continuing his research.
Lumadue, robin missions among the kafe people nfmij v9 n1 2012 (posted)William Kritsonis
NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS
Founded 1982
NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS are a group of national refereed, juried, peer-reviewed, blind-reviewed professional periodicals. Any article published shall earned five affirmative votes from members of our National Board of Invited Distinguished Jurors and must be recommended for national publication by members of the National Policy Board representing all National FORUM Journals. Journal issues are distributed both nationally and world-wide.
Our website features national refereed articles that are published daily within our National FORUM Journals Online Journal Division. Over 1,000 articles are available to scholars and practitioners world-wide. Over 250,000 guests visit our website yearly. About 56,000 articles are downloaded for academic purposes at no charge. We have about an 88% rejection rate. See: www.nationalforum.com
Founded in 1982, National FORUM Journals has published the scholarly contributions of over 5,200 professors with over 2,000 articles indexed. Our journals are indexed with many global agencies including Cabell’s Directories, ERIC, EBSCO, SWETS International, Library of Congress National Serials Data Program, and the Copyright Clearance Center, Danvers, Massachusetts.
Global Website: www.nationalforum.com
The document discusses several court cases related to student drug testing policies in schools. It summarizes rulings that upheld random drug testing for student athletes and those involved in extracurricular activities. The document also discusses the rationale for drug testing students, potential effects, types of tests, and how students sometimes try to beat drug tests.
The document discusses journals from the National Forum. In 3 sentences or less, it provides high-level information about the topic but does not include specific details or quotes from the document.
C E N S O R S H I P O F S T U D E N T P U B L I C A T I O NWilliam Kritsonis
The document summarizes two important Supreme Court cases related to censorship of student publications: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988). Tinker established that students can express personal opinions unless it causes disruption, while Hazelwood allowed more censorship if the publication was school-sponsored. The document also discusses how courts have dealt with obscenity, vulgar language, and defining school-sponsored vs open forum student publications.
Ch. 10 Educational Administration and Leadership in American Schools - Dr. Wi...William Kritsonis
The document discusses the administrative hierarchy in American school systems. It describes the roles of school boards, superintendents, principals, and other administrators. School boards establish policies and hire superintendents to implement them. Superintendents oversee the entire school district. Principals are responsible for individual schools and serve as instructional leaders and managers. The document also outlines the responsibilities, expectations, and time allocation of principals.
The document summarizes standards and benchmarks for effective school board governance in Washington state. It was developed by a task force and adopted in 2009. The standards are intended to encourage boards to focus on student achievement and subscribe to high professional standards.
The standards comprise five principles: responsible governance, communicating high expectations, conditions for student/staff success, accountability for learning, and community engagement. Each standard has benchmarks and indicators to define it in practice. The document provides references and discusses how boards can adopt the standards to improve performance through self-assessment and other means. It aims to increase public confidence in school boards.
The document discusses the roles and competencies of educational leaders such as school heads in the Philippines. It outlines 7 domains that define the competencies required of school heads, including school leadership, instructional leadership, creating a student-centered learning environment, human resource management, community partnerships, school operations management, and personal attributes. Effectively, school heads are responsible for administrative and instructional supervision, achieving educational goals and standards, and being accountable for their school's performance. National standards aim to ensure school heads are competent and committed to providing quality education through transformational leadership.
This document provides the syllabus for the ADMN 5053 Special Programs course at Prairie View A&M University. The course will be taught online by Dr. William Kritsonis and will cover administering special and compensatory education programs to ensure student success. Major topics include federal/state programs, special education law and requirements, and the roles and responsibilities of administrators in managing these programs. The goals are for students to learn about funding sources, implementing and evaluating programs, and addressing the needs of diverse special student populations. Students will not be required to purchase the textbook but are responsible for all assignments.
This document discusses school leadership in the context of a School-Based Management (SBM) environment. It outlines 10 principles of effective school leadership, including setting accountable goals, ensuring jobs are understood and accomplished, and developing teamwork. The roles and functions of school heads as educational leaders are also described, such as setting the vision and curriculum, and creating an environment conducive to teaching and learning. Different levels of school leadership maturity are identified from standard to progressive to mature. The challenges of collective responsibility and utilizing skills in communication, collaboration, and community building are also highlighted.
Status of School-Based Management Practices of Schools In Secondary Schools i...Jandel Gimeno
This document is an abstract for a master's thesis that examines the status of school-based management practices of school heads in secondary schools in Trece Martires City, Cavite, Philippines. The study aims to determine the current status of practices related to vision/goals, school programs, staff development, resource management, community involvement, donations/grants, school environment, and curriculum implementation. It will identify factors that influence implementation of school-based management and achievement of school heads' goals. The results could inform better standard operating procedures. The conceptual framework indicates that administrative duties and instructional leadership roles influence efficient school-based management and faculty performance.
This document discusses selecting educational environments and participants in curriculum development. It notes that the learning environment should challenge students and make them feel safe. Various criteria for effective educational environments are discussed, including adequacy, suitability, efficiency and economy. The document outlines many participants that should be involved in curriculum development, including teachers, students, principals, curriculum specialists, superintendents, boards of education, and the federal government. It emphasizes that teachers should play a central role as codesigners and coresearchers, and that students should have a voice. Overall participation from various stakeholders is important for developing quality curricula.
This document provides guidance on increasing school autonomy within Fulton County Schools as it transitions to a charter system. It outlines a path to innovative schools through three steps: 1) establishing why local school autonomy is important; 2) determining the parameters of autonomy using guiding principles about what decisions are made at the school versus district level; and 3) how schools can determine which flexibilities to pursue through strategic planning and requests for flexibility. The document is intended to clarify expectations and provide transparency as autonomy is increased at individual schools while maintaining district oversight of key areas like curriculum and legal/financial compliance.
- R.A. 9155, also known as the Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001, aims to protect the right to quality basic education for all citizens and make education accessible to all.
- It establishes a framework for governance of basic education that begins at the national level and includes regional, division, school, and learning center levels.
- The Department of Education is responsible for ensuring access to, promoting equity in, and improving the quality of basic education. It exercises authority over educational policies, standards, research, and personnel.
- Roles and responsibilities are defined for each governance level, from national agencies to school and learning center levels. Local participation in education is also encouraged.
The Administration and Supervisory Of Bureau of Secondary EducationPie Malang
The Bureau of Secondary Education was created to strengthen, promote, coordinate and expand vocational education programs. It aimed to develop skilled workers and enhance socioeconomic development. It took over responsibilities for academic and vocational education policies, planning, and administration at the secondary level from the abolished Bureau of Vocational Education. The Bureau was organized with a director and assistant director overseeing divisions for administration, curriculum development, staff development, and physical facilities.
A school based management system refers to decentralizing decision making authority from central, regional, and division levels to individual schools. It aims to bring together school heads, teachers, students, parents, local governments, and the community to improve schools. A key principle of school based management is accountability and continuous improvement. The system was implemented in the Philippines in 2001 through legislation and pilot projects, with the goal of empowering school heads and communities to lead reforms that improve learning outcomes and resource management.
The document provides guidance on navigating relationships with Chicago Public Schools (CPS). It discusses who site coordinators are and their responsibilities in accessing and coordinating programs. It emphasizes the importance of discussing program details, interests, and logistics with site coordinators. The document also stresses explaining how a program aligns with school goals and getting to know the school culture. It outlines best practices for presentations like confirming details in advance and wearing professional attire. Finally, it introduces the roles of various school administration and support staff like principals, counselors, nurses and social workers.
The document outlines the authority structure of Saskatchewan schools. It begins with the provincial government department of education at the top, followed by school boards, school community councils, principals, vice-principals, department heads, teachers, and paraprofessionals. It then describes the roles and responsibilities of various entities within this structure, including the province's role in establishing policy and curriculum, the roles of school boards and administrators, and the roles of teachers and department heads within individual schools.
The document outlines the authority structure of schools in Saskatchewan, beginning with the provincial government department of education down to individual schools. It describes the roles and responsibilities at each level, including the province establishing policy and funding, school boards overseeing divisions, and school community councils providing advice at the school level. Key points are that the province aims to provide equitable education across the system, while school boards and councils facilitate local input and decision making within that framework.
The document outlines the authority structure of schools in Saskatchewan, beginning with the provincial government department of education down to individual schools. It describes the roles and responsibilities at each level, including the province establishing policy and funding, school boards overseeing divisions, and school community councils providing advice at the school level. Key points are that the province aims to provide equitable education across the system, while school boards and councils facilitate local input and decision making within that framework.
This document summarizes the key findings from a study of four school districts that received grants to implement reform efforts. The researchers identified six common features of early success across the districts: 1) Ensuring the reform suits the district's mission and context, 2) Strong superintendent leadership and involvement, 3) Having effective reform "champions" to lead implementation, 4) Maintaining focus on clear objectives, 5) Advancing the reform in stages, and 6) Effective communication. The document then discusses three important aspects of strategic positioning - suitability, superintendent leadership, and reform champions. It provides examples of how each district incorporated these aspects into launching their respective reform plans.
This PPT aims to provide Knowledge and understanding to Learner about the concept of Educational Administration, Important of Educational Administration, Challenges of Educational Administration, Model of Educational Administration, Functions of Educational Administration, Levels of Educational Administration, Principle of Educational Administration, Nature of Educational Administration, Best Practices for Educational Administration and so on.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
2. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 247
CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN
SCHOOLING
A. OVERVIEW
This chapter presents information about school administrators, school boards,
superintendents, central administrative staff, and building-level administrators.
A great deal of attention is focused on school principals since they are such
critical members of the school team. Also discussed are the roles, responsibili-
ties, and characteristics of principals. Various leadership models are presented
that have been effective in business, industry, and schools.
B. KEY TERMS–DEFINITIONS
AASA - American Association of School Administrators
ADMINISTRATIVE HIERARCHY - administrative organization of a local
school district.
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL - administrative position in an individual school
that primarily assists the principal in administrative duties.
BENEFITS - school administrators receive many benefits including: higher
salaries than teachers, management responsibilities, opportunities for advance-
ment in administration, and leadership opportunities.
BUILDING LEVEL - administration of individual schools. Principals are the
key administrators. Many schools employ assistant principals, department
heads, and supervisors to assist the principal in carrying out the administrative
duties at the building level.
CENTRAL OFFICE - relates to the district administration level of school
boards.
CERTIFICATION - teacher licensing. Certification for specialized positions
such as principal requires a prescribed amount of graduate level study and suc-
cessful teaching experience.
DISTRICT-WIDE - administrative staff that oversees all activities within the
district, are all housed in the central office. These include the superintendent
and any assistants.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP - leadership that informs and guides
teachers’ decisions so that practice can mesh with policy.
LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD - a group of constituents at the top of the hierar-
chy. They hire the school superintendent. Local School Boards derive their au-
thority from, and work as agents of the state.
3. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 248
NAESP - National Association of Elementary School Principals.
NASSP - National Association of Secondary School Principals.
NCPEA - National Council of Professors of Educational Administration.
NSBA - National School Board Association.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION - evaluation of individual teachers and admin-
istrators.
PRINCIPALS - primarily instructional leaders.
PROGRAM EVALUATION - evaluation of specific programs regarding their
effectiveness.
SCHOOL POLICIES - give each school a unique personality, affect disci-
plinary methods, academic expectations and requirements, dress codes, cur-
riculum, and school climate. School policies are written guidelines that give di-
rection to the administrator(s) and other employees responsible for carrying
them out and also establish decision-making parameters.
SUPERINTENDENTS - chief school administrative officer in local school
districts.
SUPERVISORS - administrators responsible for specific programs in public
schools, e.g.: supervisor of special education, vocational education supervisor,
supervisor of elementary education, supervisors of secondary education, super-
visor of buildings and grounds.
UCEA - University Council of Educational Administration.
C. SOME PRECEDING THOUGHTS
1. What is an administrative hierarchy?
This is the equivalent to a chain of command, headed by the local school
board.
2. How did local control of public schools evolve?
Local control of education by lay persons began in the New England
colonies. The Massachusetts School Ordinance of 1642 delegated the re-
sponsibility for education to the “townsmen” making parents and
guardians responsible for children in their care to read and understand the
principles of religion and the commonwealth’s laws. This trend was rein-
forced with the Massachusetts School Ordinance of 1647 and in subse-
quent amendments passed in 1671 and 1683. Even stronger than the Mas-
sachusetts laws were the Connecticut Laws of 1650. These laws were spe-
cific in the description of duties and responsibilities of individuals selected
4. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 249
to oversee the schools. Not until 1721 in Boston, however, were individu-
als responsible for overseeing the schools set apart from the local govern-
mental structure of the community.
3. What are the specific responsibilities of local boards of education?
Local Governance Structure
SCHOOL BOARD
SUPERINTENDENT
Business Special Personnel Curriculum and
Services Services Services Instruction
LOCAL SCHOOLS
PRINCIPALS
TEACHERS
a. selecting the CEO of the school district–superintendent;
b. approving budgets;
c. determining school sites and attendance boundaries;
d. entering into contracts;
e. collective bargaining;
f. establishing criteria for employing school district personnel;
g. determining the curriculum;
h. approving school calendar;
i. adopting salary schedules for administrators, teachers, and other school
employees;
5. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 250
j. acting on the superintendent’s recommendations concerning hiring and
termination of employees, and engaging in contracts in behalf of the
district;
also
k. delegate responsibility for all administrative functions, except those
specifically reserved through board policy for the board chairman to
the superintendent;
l. support the superintendent fully in all decisions that conform to profes-
sional standards and board policy;
m. hold the superintendent responsible for the administration of the school
through regular constructive written and oral evaluations of the super-
intendent’s work;
n. provide the superintendent with a comprehensive employment contract;
o. give the superintendent the benefit of the board’s counsel in matters re-
lated to individual board members’ expertise, familiarity with the local
school system, and community interests;
p. hold all board meetings with the superintendent or designee present;
q. consult with the superintendent on all matters as they arise that concern
the school system and on which the board may take action;
r. develop a plan for board-superintendent communications;
s. channel communications with school employees that require action
through the superintendent and refer all applications, complaints, and
other communications, oral or written, first to the superintendent in or-
der to assure that the district processes such communications in an
effective, coordinated fashion and is responsive to students and patrons;
t. take action on matters only after hearing the recommendations of the
superintendent;
u. establish a policy on effective management of complaints;
v. provide the superintendent with sufficient administrative help, especial-
ly in the area of monitoring teaching and learning.
4. What is the relationship between the superintendent and the board of
education?
The local school board hires the superintendent as the CEO of the adminis-
trative offices.
6. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 251
5. In what roles do superintendents become involved?
a. maintain relations with the board;
b. educational leader;
c. maintain positive relations with the community.
6. What roles do assistant central office staff fill?
The duties performed by central staff administrators are determined by
their specific roles. For example, in a small district there may be only one
assistant superintendent. This individual may be assigned the responsibili-
ties for transportation, food services, and the curriculum. In large districts,
these duties may be divided among several central office staff members.
7. What are the primary roles of school principals?
a. child advocate;
b. manager;
c. instructional leader;
d. disciplinarian;
e. human relations facilitator;
f. evaluator;
g. conflict manager;
h. collective bargaining agent;
i. adult developer;
l. change agent or innovator;
k. community relations liaison.
8. What are the major management responsibilities of principals?
Although the principal’s role as instructional leader is considered by many
to be the primary role, without expertise and leadership in the noninstruc-
tional activities, the school would have a difficult time functioning.
9. How do principals influence the school climate?
The way the principal carries out his various duties will greatly influence
the school climate. See question #7 for duties.
10. How does a typical principal spend a day?
Typical day: 33% on paperwork, 13.5% parent conferences, 13.5% person-
nel conferences, 9% discipline, 9% scheduling, 9% cafeteria duties, 2.5%
instructional leadership. Principals in effective schools are likely to spend
more time related to the curriculum and instruction.
7. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 252
11. What expectations do various groups have for principals?
Principals are expected to do many different things for many different peo-
ple, such as teachers, students, central administration personnel, state de-
partments of education, and the local community. Students expect a per-
sonal relationship. Teachers expect support with discipline problems, pro-
fessional treatment, and being able to participate in the decision-making
process. Parents expect instructional leadership, collaborating with parents,
and keeping the interest of students foremost. Superiors expect carrying
out of school policies, maintenance of a positive relationship with the com-
munity, instructional leadership, student discipline, and effective manage-
ment of the school. Although principals cannot always meet the expecta-
tions of everyone, they must at least determine the feasibility of meeting
the expectations that impact on the school. Principals cannot be all things
to all people; they must make decisions related to which expectations are
in the best interests of the school.
12. What are some group roles that should be supported by the school ad-
ministrator?
a. The Energizer: provides energy, motivation, and drive to the group;
b. The Procedural Expert: understands how the organization functions
and understands its rules and regulations;
c. The Evaluator: is able to dispassionately view group ideas and logi-
cally utilize them without negatively impacting group members;
d. The Opinion Seeker: carefully seeks ideas and encourages the partici-
pation of all group members;
e. The Initiator: suggests new or different ideas for discussion and ap-
proaches to problems;
f. The Opinion Giver: states pertinent beliefs about discussion and oth-
ers’ suggestions;
g. The Elaborator: builds on suggestions of others;
h. The Clarifier: gives relevant examples; offers rationale; probes for
meaning; restates problems;
i. The Tester: raises questions to “test out” whether group is ready to
come to a decision;
j. The Summarizer: reviewers discussion, pulls it together;
k. The Tension Reliever: uses humor or calls for breaks at appropriate
times to draw off negative feelings;
8. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 253
l. The Compromiser: willing to yield when necessary for progress;
m. The Harmonizer: mediates differences; reconciles points of view;
n. The Encourager: praises and supports others; friendly; encouraging;
o. The Gate-Keeper: keeps communications open; encourages participa-
tion.
Source: Chance, E.W. (1992). Visionary leadership in schools: Successful strategies for developing
and implementing an educational vision. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Adapted with
permission.
13. What are some group roles that are negative and should not be sup-
ported by the school administrator?
a. The Sympathizer: attempts to garner the group’s sympathy of com-
plaining, confessing, or condemning certain activities of the organization;
b. The Aggressor: criticizes and deflates others; disagrees with others ag-
gressively;
c. The Blocker: stubbornly disagrees; rejects others’ views; cites unrelat-
ed personal experiences; returns to topics already resolved;
d. The Withdrawer: won’t participate; converses privately; self-appoint-
ed note-taker;
e. The Recognition Seeker: boasts; excessive talking; conscious of his/
her status;
f. The Topic Jumper: keeps changing the subject;
g. The Dominator: tries to assert authority; manipulate group;
h. The Special-Interest Pleader: uses group’s time to plead his/her own
case;
i. The Playboy/girl: wastes group’s time showing off; story teller; non-
chalant; cynical;
j. The Devil’s Advocate: more devil than advocate.
Source: Chance, E.W. (1992). Visionary leadership in schools: Successful strategies for developing
and implementing an educational vision. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Adapted with
permission.
9. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 254
14. What are some effective traits and skills of the effective school admin-
istrator?
Traits Skills
Adaptable to situation Clever
Alert to social environment Intelligent
Ambitious and Conceptually skilled
achievement-oriented
Assertive Creative
Cooperative Diplomatic and tactful
Decisive Fluent in speaking
Dependable Knowledgeable about group tasks
Dominant (desire to Organized (administrative ability)
influence others)
Energetic (high activity level) Persuasive
Persistent Socially skilled
Self-confident
Tolerant of stress
Willing to assume responsibility
Source: Yukl, G.A. (1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,
Inc. Adapted with permission.
15. What do superior school administrators have in common?
a. trust and have confidence in both the capabilities and the motivation of
subordinates and believe that they want to accept responsibility and
work hard;
b. believe that shared authority and participation is both desirable and
useful;
c. seek achievement and legitimate power;
d. are reasonably self-confident, assured, optimistic, sensitive, and alert.
Source: Sayles, L.R. (1979). LEADERSHIP - What effective managers really do . . . and how they
do it. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Adapted with permission.
10. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 255
16. According to the literature, what are some characteristics for school
leadership?
Characteristics Reference
A vital and clear vision Bogue 1985; Covey 1989; Duke
1987; Gardner 1987, 1988; Levine
1987; Manasse 1986
A strong and positive self-concept Bogue 1985; Covey 1989
Decision making and judgment in Bogue 1985; Gardner 1988; Man-
action asse 1986
Honesty, integrity, and strong Covey 1989; Daugherty 1987;
moral components Larkin 1986; Manasse 1986;
Communication skills Bingham 1986; Clark & Teddlie
1987; Daugherty 1987; Papalewis &
Brown 1989; Quate 1986
17. According to the literature, what are some leadership characteristics
specific to women?
Leadership Characteristics Found in the Literature
Value system that stresses caring, Shakeshaft 1986, 1987b; Helgesen
service, and relationships 1990, 1995; Dorn, O’Rourke, & Pa-
palewis 1997
Focus on instruction and Shakeshaft 1986, 1987b, 1989b,
instructional issues 1995; Smith 1994; Eakle 1995;
Mims 1992
Focus on supporting, on sense of Shakeshaft 1986, 1987b, 1989b,
community, consensus build- 1995; Schaef 1985; Helgesen 1990,
ing, cooperation 1995; Dorn, O’Rourke, & Papalewis
1997
Orderly, organized Shakeshaft 1989b, 1995; McGrath
1992; Eakle 1995; Woo 1985
Openness; depth of feeling Loden 1985; Helgesen 1990, 1995;
Schaef 1985
Listening skills, clarity, communi- Dorn, O’Rourke, & Papalewis 1997;
cation skills Papalewis & Brown 1988; Hanson
1991; Papalewis 1995
Table continues
11. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 256
Table continued
Leadership Characteristics Found in the Literature
Interpersonal skills Helgesen 1990, 1995; Loden 1985;
Cooper 1992; Hanson 1991;
Cartwright 1994
Vision; Global; Big Picture Helgesen 1990, 1995; Loden 1985;
Schaef 1985
Persistency; Determination Marshall 1986; Mims 1992; Hill &
Ragland 1995
Inner strength Schaef 1985; Smith 1994; Helgesen
1995; Marshall 1986
Relationships are central Schaef 1981, 1985; Loden 1985;
Helgesen 1990, 1995; Shakeshaft
1986, 1987, 1989b, 1995; Hill &
Ragland 1995
Source: O’Rourke, C. (1998). Women’s leadership skills, attitudes, and experiences: A descriptive
ethnographic multiple case study of women in the superintendency in the public schools in
the state of California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of La Verne, La Verne,
CA. Adapted with permission.
18. According to experts, what leadership characteristics, skills, attitudes,
behaviors, and experiences are published in the literature?
Leadership Characteristics Authors in the Literature
Physical energy, stamina, person- Covey 1989; Gardner 1988
al mastery
Decision-making and problem- Gardner 1988; Tosi, Rizzo, & Car-
solving skills roll 1994
Personal values, and personal and Covey 1989; Kouzes & Posner
shared vision 1987; Manasse 1986; Senge 1990;
Senge et al. 1994
Enthusiasm for life and for the job Cangemi 1986; Covey 1989; Kouzes
as reflected in positive attitudes & Posner 1987; Jones & Bearley
and actions, intuition and per- 1996; Hall, 1996; Helgesen 1990,
ception of mistakes as ways to 1995; Senge 1990; Senge et al. 1994
learn
Possession of listening skills, peo- Jones & Bearley 1996; Hanson
ple skills, managerial skills, 1991; Lutz 1986; Obermeyer 1996
technical skills
Table continues
12. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 257
Table continued
Leadership Characteristics Authors in the Literature
Ability to evaluate people and Lutz 1986; Tosi, Rizzo, & Carroll
programs, strong morals, and 1994; Covey 1989; Kouzes & Pos-
ethical principles which are ad- ner 1987; Larkin 1986; Peck 1992
hered to in actions and attitudes
Caring about and belief in people, Cangemi 1986; Harvey & Drolet
as shown through empathetic, 1994; Helgesen 1995; Kouzes &
helpful and nonconflictive ac- Posner 1987; Peck 1992; Yukl 1994
tions
Ability to integrate and to be help- Cangemi 1986; Peck 1992; Yukl
ful 1994
Ability to learn and to grow from Jones & Bearley 1996; Covey 1989;
experience and problems Katzenbach & Smith 1993; Kouzes
& Posner 1987; Harvey & Drolet
1994; Helgesen 1995; Manasse
1986; Peck 1992; Senge 1990; Sen-
ge et al. 1994
Vital and clear vision Bogue 1985; Duke 1987; Endeman
1990; Gardner 1987, 1988; Levine
1987; Manasse 1986; Senge 1990;
Senge et al. 1994
Decision making and judgment in Bogue 1985; Gardner 1988; Konnert
action & Augenstein 1990; Konnert 1995;
Manasse 1986
Honesty, integrity, and strong Covey 1989; Daugherty 1987; Kon-
moral components nert & Augenstein 1990; Konnert
1995; Larkin 1986; Manasse 1986;
Peck 1992
Communication skills Bingham 1986; Clark & Teddlie
1987; Papalewis & Brown 1989; Pa-
palewis 1995; Quate 1986; Shake-
shaft 1995
13. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 258
19. What are some female and male patterns of leadership?
Females Males
Gender as a Variable in Team Building
Competence valued before trust in Trust valued before competence in
team membership (Shakeshaft team membership (Shakeshaft
1995) 1995)
Trust for women: “an expectancy Trust for men: “ability and comfort
that the word, promise, or writ- to say what they wished to say –
ten statement of another indi- confident that others would not
vidual or group could be relied repeat.” (Garfinkel 1988; Schaef
on” (Garfinkel 1988; Schaef 1985; Shakeshaft 1995)
1985)
Men do not see untrustworthiness if
not delivered on time (Shakeshaft
1995)
Expect and value discussion of is- Expect that conversation/informa-
sues related to work. Expect tion not be divulged unless so
subordinate to talk about issues instructed (Schaef, 1985; Shake-
discussed (Schaef 1985; Shake- shaft 1995)
shaft 1995)
Loyal and ethical behavior con- Loyalty shown by not disagreeing
ceptualized as loyal team mem- with the boss, except privately
ber speaking up when there was (Helgesen 1995; Schaef 1985;
disagreement with course of ac- Shakeshaft 1995)
tion taken by boss
Gender as a Variable in Evaluation/Feedback
Women have to work harder to Men receive more feedback and
get men to “hear” them (Shake- more types of feedback in conver-
shaft 1995) sations, than women (Shakeshaft
1995)
Women listen for feeling (Gilli- Men listen for facts (Gilligan 1982;
gan 1982; Shakeshaft 1987b, Shakeshaft 1987b, 1995)
1995)
Table continues
14. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 259
Table continued
Females Males
Gender as a Variable in Evaluation/Feedback (Con’t)
Women focus on instruction (Hall
1996; Shakeshaft 1987b, 1995)
Collaborative, consulting (Hall Male administrators are less likely
1996; Helgesen 1995; Shake- to give direct feedback to females
shaft 1995) but more likely to give it to
males; if a female errors males
not likely to give feedback to fe-
male but to correct mistake with-
out her knowledge (Shakeshaft
1987b, 1995)
Women are evaluated less favor- Males evaluate females more harsh-
ably than equally competent ly than females evaluate females
men (Shakeshaft 1987b, 1995) (Hall 1996; Shakeshaft 1987b,
1995)
Women more likely to get Men receive both more positive and
nonevaluative feedback or neu- more negative responses (Shake-
tral responses (Shakeshaft shaft 1995)
1995)
Women take criticism hard. Men fail to give women important
“They tended to think it was an corrective feedback that would
assessment of their very have allowed women to improve
essence” (Shakeshaft 1995) performance (Shakeshaft 1995)
Source: O’Rourke, C. (1998). Women’s leadership skills, attitudes, and experiences: A descriptive
ethnographic multiple case study of women in the superintendency in the public schools in
the state of California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of La Verne, La Verne,
CA. Adapted with permission.
20. What are some questions that need to be answered in developing a
personal vision as a school administrator?
a. What are my five greatest strengths?
b. What are my five greatest weaknesses?
c. What are three things I most value in my professional life?
d. With what style of leadership am I most comfortable?
15. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 260
e. What are the most important things I want to accomplish in this school
district?
f. What do I want to prove as an administrator?
g. How would I like to be remembered as an administrator?
21. What are the classical notions of Frederick Taylor’s organizational
theory?
a. Be a hierarchical chain of command.
b. Be various levels of authority.
c. Be established divisions of labor.
d. Be clearly defined tasks.
e. Be established rules of behavior.
f. Be a system of punishments that are personally costly if one violates
the rules or fails to complete the assigned task.
g. Employees must be recruited on the basis of their ability and technical
knowledge.
h. Employees must be expected to perform the tasks in the same manner
since all tasks have been standardized.
Taylor strongly believed his theory would result in every job being per-
formed efficiently, productively, and with the least effort.
22. What are some general characteristics of social systems?
Social systems have boundaries, a purpose for survival, and interact within
their environment. Social systems have both bureaucratic and organiza-
tional expectations, informal norms, and are comprised of individuals hav-
ing needs, wants, desires, and aspirations. Internal and external forces, de-
mands, and expectations reinforce appropriate responses.
23. What career opportunities are there for school administrators?
Most administrators start out as classroom teachers. This seems to be the
best way to become a school administrator. Most states have specific certi-
fication requirements for administrators that go beyond the requirements
for a teaching certificate, supervisor certificate, and superintendent certifi-
cate. The requirements for these certificates vary from state to state, but
usually include college coursework at the graduate level and experience as
a teacher. Some states do not require a specific license for administrators.
16. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 261
24. What are the rules for supervisory conferences with teachers?
“The Worst Things To Do”
a. Always hold conferences at the end of a hard day. Friday afternoon is
hard to beat.
b. Make administrators look pretty inadequate. But be subtle.
c. When talking to a teacher, blame other teachers. When talking to more
than one teacher, blame counselors or psychologists. Never be afraid to
take sides in an argument among teachers. It brings them closer togeth-
er.
d. If a teacher begins to understand you, try using more pedagogics. If the
teacher himself has held a position similar to yours, you are in trouble.
e. Try to do most of the talking. It may be hard to stop a teacher once he
gets started. If necessary, interrupt him “Just a minute, I disagree.”
f. Explain your superior experience in teaching–especially if the teacher
has transferred from another school or is new.
g. Always stress existing departmental or grade level organization prob-
lems. It will help the teachers see what you are up against.
h. Let other teachers or secretaries overhear the conversation. Maybe they
will try to make something of themselves.
i. If the teacher is tired, conduct the interview standing up. It may shorten
the whole thing, and the teacher probably wants to get home anyway.
j. Ask if there has been any insanity in the family. This will get a chuckle
when the going gets rough.
k. Tell teachers about other difficult cases that are even worse than theirs.
Supply names, where needed, but indicate that “I don’t want to be un-
professional.”
l. Try staring out the window.
25. What are eight irritating habits of supervisors?
a. Supervisor says something and then denies it at the next meeting.
b. Passes the buck on problems.
c. Says, “We’ll have to think about it.”
d. Doesn’t give me a chance to talk.
e. Belittles my suggestions.
f. Interrupts me when I talk.
17. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 262
g. Argues with everything I say.
h. Rephrases and puts words in my mouth.
Source: Walker, J.J. (January 1976). Georgia teachers list of irritating supervisory habits. Phi Delta
Kappan, 57, 350. Adapted with permission.
26. What are the elements of having a good committee?
a. Facts About Delegation
1. delegate authority–to horde it is to lose it;
2. delegate authority with responsibility;
3. work through channels; don’t destroy the right to hold him or her
accountable by unnecessarily interfering with work;
4. delegate only if you have confidence;
5. assigning responsibility does not lessen your responsibility;
6. clearly define the responsibility to each subordinate;
7. follow-up delegation; don’t over supervise;
8. delegate so employee is supervised by one person;
9. never assign distasteful duties because they are unpleasant, cor-
recting, discharging, or disciplining;
10. when you delegate authority over others, back him or her up when
authority is challenged;
11. be sure to straighten out any complaints about an employee over-
stepping his or her authority;
12. let every subordinate know just what decisions he or she has au-
thority to make.
b. Why Committees Fail
1. committee has no clear-cut assignment, no reason to exist;
2. chairperson is not qualified by experience, desire, or ability;
3. members get appointed who are neither interested nor experi-
enced;
4. group has no orderly plan, no time schedule;
5. members talk, talk, talk, talk, without decisions;
6. work of the committee is not publicly recognized by the organiza-
tion;
7. committee’s recommendations are not acted on;
18. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 263
8. members do not show up for meetings;
9. staff sends agenda out late or distributes it at the meeting;
10. staff does not provide needed documentation;
11. minutes are sent out late or not at all;
12. five to fifteen members is a reasonable number for a committee.
c. On Being A Good Committee Member
1. is receptive and open to ideas;
2. has perspective on subject of concern to the committee;
3. is familiar with the aims of the organization and agrees with them;
4. enjoys the give and take of committee discussion;
5. is able to express ideas clearly;
6. is willing to give the needed time for meeting attendance;
7. has good judgment, is not narrow and arrogant;
8. can think in terms of the welfare of the group rather than own in-
terests.
d. What Makes A Good Chairperson
1. starts and ends the meeting on time;
2. allows the group to get well acquainted;
3. sees to it that as many as possible participate in discussion;
4. keeps the discussion directed to the topic and toward the objec-
tive;
5. acts as a guide and leader;
6. summarizes the decisions from time to time;
7. does not talk about an individual on the committee;
8. is seen as sincere and thoughtful by the committee;
9. summarizes the meeting and the actions to be taken by the mem-
bers;
10. works with members between meetings.
e. Logistics of the Meeting
1. agenda is sent out in advance of meeting;
2. documentation for the agenda is also provided in advance;
19. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 264
3. meeting place should be carefully selected;
4. meeting room is comfortable;
5. meeting room should be set up in round or oval arrangement;
6. paper, pencils, glasses and water pitchers, etc., provided if neces-
sary;
7. food or dinner–if served–should be light;
8. whenever possible, the group should act by consensus;
9. people somewhat unfriendly to each other should not be seated op-
posite each other. Members who are very friendly to each other
should not be seated side by side.
D. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS AND EXERCISES
1. What is leadership?
In general, leadership is helping others toward common goals or purposes.
2. Why do we have school administrators?
Schools are complex organizations that must have leaders. In schools,
leaders are called administrators. Without administrators, schools would
have no direction. They would be institutions without leadership function-
ing in a haphazard fashion.
3. Describe the administrative hierarchy in a middle-sized school district.
At the top of the hierarchy is the local school board, a group of con-
stituents. The local board hires the school superintendent, who is the chief
local school officer. The superintendent, in turn, employs other central of-
fice administrative staff, as well as building principals. Each level of the
hierarchy serves a specific purpose involving the administration of the
public schools.
4. What are the major roles of principals? Do they differ at the elemen-
tary and secondary levels? If so, how?
Principals are expected to perform many varied roles in today’s schools,
including manager, instructional leader, child advocate, disciplinarian, hu-
man relations, facilitator, evaluator, conflict manager, change agent or inno-
vator, community relations, and adult developer. The major role of school
principals remains the same, regardless of the age level of the students.
5. What are the essential 10 attributes for success as a school administra-
tor?
20. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 265
a. develop style relative to interpersonal relations;
b. develop patience;
c. develop a systematic approach to discipline;
d. develop the ability to delegate authority and responsibility;
e. develop skills to observe and evaluate teaching performance;
f. develop a philosophy of education;
g. develop a “style” or “approach”;
h. develop a method to check the use of time;
i. develop goals and develop objectives to attain them;
j. develop a model for decision making.
6. What are some descriptors of autocratic and democratic leadership
styles?
Autocratic Democratic
Boss Leader
Command Invitation
Power Influence
Pressure Stimulation
Demanding cooperation Winning cooperation
Imposing ideas Selling ideas
Domination Guidance
Criticism Encouragement
Faultfinding Acknowledge achieving
Punishing Helping
I tell you Discussion
I decide, you obey I suggest, you decide
7. What are the components of Frederick Herzberg’s Motivation-Hy-
giene Theory?
Herzberg’s theory has been widely accepted by administrators. Its basic
postulate is that one set of rewards contributes to job satisfaction and a
separate set to job dissatisfaction.
The Motivation-Hygiene Theory is based on Herzberg’s findings from his
study of industrial employee motivation to work. In interviews with 203
accountants and engineers, Herzberg used a critical-incidents procedure
21. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 266
that essentially asked each person interviewed to describe events experi-
enced at work that had resulted in either a marked improvement or a sig-
nificant reduction in job satisfaction.
The study found that positive events were dominated by references to
achievement, recognition (verbal), the work itself (challenging), responsi-
bility, and advancement (promotion). Negative events were dominated by
reference to interpersonal relations with superiors and peers, technical su-
pervision, company policy and administration, working conditions, and
personal life.
Representation of the Motivation-Hygiene Theory
Job Satisfaction
Dissatisfaction (–) (+) Satisfaction
MOTIVATORS OR SATISFIERS
Achievement
Recognition
Work itself
Responsibility
Advancement
HYGIENES OR DISSATISFIERS
Interpersonal relations–subordinates
Interpersonal relations–peers
Supervision–technical
Policy and administration
Working conditions
Personal life
Dissatisfaction (–) (+) Satisfaction
MOTIVATORS HYGIENES (NON-MOTIVATORS)
1. Achievement 6. Salary
2. Recognition 7. Possibility of growth
3. Work itself 8. Interpersonal relations–subordinates
4. Responsibility 9. Status
5. Advancement 10. Interpersonal relations–superiors
11. Interpersonal relations–peers
12. Supervision–technical
13. Company (school) policy and
administration
14. Working conditions
22. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 267
15. Personal life
16. Job security
8. What are the components of Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theo-
ry Y?
Douglas McGregor stressed the importance of understanding the relation-
ship between motivation and human nature. In observing the practices of
traditional managers, McGregor believed that managers usually attempt to
motivate employees by one of two basic approaches. He referred to these
approaches as Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X is the traditional view
of management that suggests that managers are required to coerce, con-
trol, or threaten employees in order to motivate them. In contrast, McGre-
gor proposed an alternative philosophy of human nature, which he referred
to as Theory Y. Theory Y is a view of management by which a manager
believes people are capable of being responsible and mature. Employees
do not require coercions or excessive control by the manager in order to
perform effectively. McGregor’s belief was that Theory Y is a more realis-
tic assessment of people.
McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y
Theory X Theory Y
The average person inherently dis- The expenditure of physical and
likes work and will avoid it if possi- mental effort in work is as natural
ble. as play or rest.
Because of the dislike of work, most People will exercise self-direction
people must be coerced, controlled, and self-control in the service of
directed, and threatened with punish- objectives to which they are com-
ment to get them to perform effect- mitted.
ively.
The average person lacks ambition, Commitment to objectives is a
avoids responsibility, and seeks secu- function of the rewards associated
rity and economic rewards above all with achievement.
else.
Most people lack creative ability and The average person learns, under
are resistant to change. proper conditions, not only to ac-
cept but to seek responsibility.
Since most people are self-centered, The capacity to exercise a relative-
they are not concerned with the goals ly high degree of imagination, in-
of the organization. genuity, and creativity in the solu-
tion of organizational problems is
widely, not narrowly, distributed
24. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 269
chy of needs theory, an individual’s needs are arranged in a hierarchy from
the lower-level physiological needs to the higher-level needs for self-actual-
ization. The physiological needs are the highest priority because until they
are reasonably satisfied, other higher-level needs will not emerge to moti-
vate behavior.
10. How are Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy and Herzberg’s Motivation-Hy-
giene Theory related?
Maslow’s Hierarchy Herzberg’s Motivators
Self-Actualization Needs □ Achievement
□ Work Itself
(Realizing one’s □ Recognition
potential growth using cre- □ Responsibility
ative talents) □ Opportunity for Growth and
Advancement
Esteem Needs
(Achievement
recognition and status)
Social Needs
Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors
(Love, belonging, □ Interpersonal Relations
affiliation, acceptance) □ Company Policies and
Administrative Practices
Safety Needs □ Working Conditions
□ Supervision
□ Status
(Protection against danger, □ Job Security
freedom from fear, security) □ Pay
□ Benefits
Physiological Needs
(Survival needs, air, water, food,
clothing, shelter and sex)
25. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 270
11. What are the components of Porter’s Hierarchy of Work Motivation?
SELF-ACTUALIZATION
Working at full potential Feeling successful at work
Achieving goals viewed as significant
AUTONOMY
Control of work situation, influence in the organization,
participation in important decisions, authority to utilize
organizational resources
SELF-ESTEEM
Titles, feeling self-respect, evidence of respect by
others, status symbols, recognition, promotions, awards,
being part of “insiders” group
AFFILIATION
Belonging to formal and informal work groups,
friendships, professional association and unions,
acceptance by peers beyond the immediate organization
SECURITY
Pay, union, seniority, retirement plan, tenure, such legal
concepts as “due process” and “fairness,” statutory and
policy protections establishing orderly evaluation and
“RIF” procedures, the negotiated contract, insurance plans
26. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 271
12. What are the components of David McClelland’s Needs Theory?
McClelland emphasized that there are certain needs that are learned and
socially acquired as the individual interacts with the environment. McClel-
land’s needs theory is concerned with how individual needs and environ-
mental factors combine to form three basic human motives: the need for
achievement, the need for power, and the need for affiliation.
Need for Achievement
A person with a high need for achievement tends to be characterized as an
individual who
• wants to take personal responsibility for finding solutions to problems;
• is goal oriented;
• seeks a challenge–and establishes moderate, realistic, and attainable
goals that involve risk but are not impossible to attain;
• desires concrete feedback on performance;
• has a high level of energy and is willing to work hard.
For these people, the value of goal accomplishment is enhanced if the
goals are at least moderately difficult to achieve and if there is a significant
degree of risk involved. Individuals are better able to “manage” them-
selves and satisfy the basic drive for achievement.
Need for Power
A high need for power means that an individual seeks to influence or con-
trol others. Such an individual tends to be characterized as a person who
• is concerned with acquiring, exercising, or retaining power to influence
over others;
• likes to compete with others in situations that allow him or her to be
dominant;
• enjoys confrontations with others.
McClelland said that there are two basic aspects of power: positive and
negative. Positive use of power is essential if a manager is to accomplish
results through the effort of others. The negative face of power is when an
individual seeks power for personal benefit, which may prove detrimental
to the organization.
27. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 272
Need for Affiliation
The need for affiliation is related to the desire for affection and establish-
ing friendly relationships. A person with a high need for affiliation tends to
be characterized as one who
• seeks to establish and maintain friendships and close emotional relation-
ships with others;
• wants to be liked by others;
• enjoys parties, social activities, and bull sessions;
• seeks a sense of belonging by joining groups or organizations.
According to this theory, the probability that an individual will perform a
job effectively and efficiently depends on a combination of:
• the strength of the motive or need relative to other needs;
• the possibility of success in performing the task;
• the strength value of the incentive or reward for performance.
13. What are the components of William Ouchi’s Theory Z?
Theory Z is the belief that a high degree of mutual responsibility, loyalty,
and consideration between companies and their employees will result in
higher productivity and improved employee welfare. Theory Z companies
tend to practice a system of lifetime employment and avoid layoffs. The
companies usually enjoy low employee turnover, low absenteeism, and
high employee morale. The workers are more involved in their jobs with
the company, a factor that leads to increased productivity and perfor-
mance. Theory Z companies tend to develop their own traditions, ideals,
and culture, and foster somewhat of a “family environment.” This “family”
or culture within the organization tends to bond its members–employees
and manager–thereby facilitating decision making and communications
within the company.
14. What are the components of a Job Enrichment Model?
Job enrichment refers to basic changes in the content and level of re-
sponsibility of a job so as to provide greater challenge to the worker. The
individual is provided with an opportunity to derive a feeling of greater
achievement, recognition, responsibility, and personal growth in perform-
ing the job. There are a number of principles applicable for implementa-
tion:
a. Increasing job demand: Changing the job in such a way as to in-
crease the level of difficulty and responsibility of the job.
28. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 273
b. Increasing a worker’s accountability: Allowing more individual
control and authority over the work while retaining accountability of
the manager.
c. Providing work scheduling freedom: Within limits, allowing individ-
ual workers to schedule their own work.
d. Providing feedback: Making timely periodic reports on performance
to employees (directly to the worker rather than to the supervisor).
e. Providing new learning experiences: Work situations should encour-
age opportunities for new experiences and personal growth of the indi-
vidual.
15. What are the components of a Job Enlargement?
Job enlargement is the changes in the scope of a job so as to provide
greater variety to the worker. Job enlargement provides a horizontal ex-
pansion of duties. Increased responsibility means providing the worker
with increased freedom to do the job–make decisions and exercise more
self-control over the work.
16. What are the components of the Model of the Organization as a Social
System (Getzels-Guba Model)?
Institution Role Expectation
Social Observed
System Behavior
Individual Personality Need-Disposition
Source: Adapted from Getzels, J.W., & Guba, E.G. (1957 Winter). Social behavior and the administrative pro-
cess. The School Review, 65, 423-441. Reprinted with permission.
29. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 274
17. What are the components of the Guba & Getzels Model?
The administrator has
ACTUATING FORCE
(AUTHORITY)
which derives from
Role Dimension Person Dimension
(nomothetic) (ideographic)
Delegates status Achieved prestige
and authority and authority
which enables him to influence the
BEHAVIOR OF SUBORDINATES
toward
GOALS OF SCHOOL
Source: Getzels, J.W., & Guba, E.G. (1957 Winter). Social behavior and the administrative process. The
School Review, 65, 423-441. Adapted with permission.
30. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 275
18. What are the nine components of Kritsonisms?
1. We don’t hire good people, we make them.
• We allow them feedback, direction, hire potential.
• Marriage, we don’t find good partners, we make ourselves a good
partner.
• Diamond polishers, we develop them. Do we chip or do we polish?
2. High risk and failure is BETTER than low risk and success.
• Try new things.
• High effort risk.
3. Never ask for volunteers.
• Ask people personally to volunteer.
• Know your people.
• Go ask them. Do not call them on the telephone.
4. Do tough jobs first.
• Tough job first, 80% or the total work.
• Toughest job.
• Easy last.
• Use the cheese cake theory–take a bite out of it. Do tough jobs first.
5. Sometimes we do things we are not good at.
• Most people know if they are not doing a good job.
6. Good ideas must be sold as better ideas.
• Sell good ideas.
• A new idea isn’t a good idea until it is sold.
7. Keep it simple.
• Keep ideas simple.
• Don’t let it get complex.
• Keep it big and keep it simple.
8. Be problem conscious.
• Look down the road.
• Solve problems before they get out-of-hand.
31. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 276
9. Let people see you as a person.
• Open yourself up.
• If more than 25% of your people are deadwood, then look at your-
self.
19. What are the major components of the Kritsonis Balanced Teeter Tot-
ter Model?
The Kritsonis Balanced Teeter-Totter Model emphasizes the utilization
of more effective technical skills, human skills, and conceptual skills. Krit-
sonis asserts that technical, human, and conceptual skills should be devel-
oped and refined through experience.
The teetering component illustrates that when educators function produc-
tively, the model remains balanced. The educator exhibits competency.
When the teetering component is not functioning productively, it teeter-
totters, swings back-and-forth causing frustration, insecurities, and multi-
ple dysfunctions resulting in low-level production, and in some cases in-
competency.
Te c lls
hni
cal n Ski
Ski m a
lls Hu
T E C H N IC A L S K IL L S H U M A N S K IL L S
ills Hu
ca l Sk m a
n S
hni k ill
Tec s
C O N C E P T U A L S K IL L S
Dr. William Kritsonis has served education in the roles of teacher, principal, superintendent of schools, director of
student teaching and field experiences, editor, and university professor.
E. REVIEW ITEMS
True-False
1. The local school board is at the top of the school system’s administrative
hierarchy.
2. The principal is the chief local school officer.
32. SCHOOLING (2002)
PAGE 277
3. Local control of schools by lay persons began in the New England
colonies.
4. Local school boards are regulated by state statutes.
5. Requirements established by local school boards may exceed state require-
ments in various areas, such as graduation criteria and teacher pay.
6. The superintendent is an employee of the school board.
7. The chief executive officer of the local school district is the superinten-
dent.
8. The district superintendent is a key individual in the functioning of any lo-
cal school district.
9. The principal reports directly to the school board regarding the function of
the school.
10. Many people consider the principal’s primary role to be an instructional
leader.
11. Students seem to want more rather than fewer rules.
12. Studies indicate that the largest part of a principal’s time is spent on disci-
plinary matters.
13. The career ladder to administration usually starts in the classroom.
14. Most states lack specific certification requirements for administrators.
Multiple Choice
1. The powers and responsibilities of local school boards are established by
_______.
a. local citizenry b. local school board c. state statutes
d. federal law
2. The following are all duties of the school board except _______.
a. enforcing state and federal laws b. designing schools
c. staffing schools d. all of the above are included
3. Local school board members can be _______.
a. elected b. appointed c. either a or b d. none of the above
4. The income group most heavily represented on typical school boards is
_______.
a. lower b. middle c. upper middle d. upper
33. CHAPTER 10–EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN SCHOOLING
PAGE 278
5. The typical board member possesses _______ education.
a. high school b. some college c. bachelors degree or higher
d. masters degree or higher
6. The key administrative figure at the building level is the _______.
a. school board member b. superintendent c. principal
d. administrative assistant
7. The role of the principal is _______.
a. disciplinarian b. instructional leader c. manager
d. all of the above
8. The text cites that a feature of an effective discipline program is _______.
a. a philosophy of discipline clearly stated in the student handbook
b. swift and severe punishment
c. more principal time on discipline
d. all of the above
9. Principals can encourage an attitude favorable to change through _______.
a. encouraging collaboration among staff
b. taking responsibility for change efforts
c. narrowing communication channels to those directly involved
d. all of the above
10. Students’ expect a _______ from principals.
a. personal relationship b. instructional guidance
c. counselor/client relationship d. none of the above
11. The majority of the principal’s time is probably spent on _______.
a. discipline b. paperwork c. evaluation of staff or programs
d. instructional leadership
12. Most school administrators _______.
a. start as classroom teachers
b. have masters degrees or above
c. hold specific certifications in administration
d. all of the above