Challenges in Research Assessment:
A funder’s view
Challenges in Research Assessment:
A funder’s view (ish)
Wellcome Trust
 Spend approximately £700 million
on research per year on
biomedicine & societal context
 Wide range of funding schemes
supporting people, places, teams,
innovation
Funders’ challenge part 1: who & what to fund?
 Person - track record; potential
 Idea – fit with strategic focus? excellent? new thinking?
 Environment/place
 Team/collaborators
who & what to fund: toolkit
Challenge of authorship
Funders’ challenge part 2: did we make right decision?
 Understanding ‘scientific’ progress & impact
 Should we fund further?
 Did it help to achieve organisation’s goals & strategy?
did we make right decision: toolkit
 Markers of research progress & impact (qualitative & quantitative)
 Measure of use & re-use
 Use of proxies
Challenge of impact
Impact is defined as ‘any effect on, change or benefit to the
economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health,
the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’
HEFCE 2014
Impact is defined as ‘any effect on, change or benefit to the
economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health,
the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’
HEFCE 2014
Challenge of impact
do we measure what counts or
count what we can measure?
o Building infrastructure to provide ‘evidence’ & insight
 Automated ‘evidence’ gathering
 System connectors
 Standards & definitions
o Ability to consider wider range of research contributions &
products: ‘beyond authorship’
o Research on research (‘science of science’)
Steps towards more greater insight …

Challenges in research assessment: a funder's view

  • 1.
    Challenges in ResearchAssessment: A funder’s view
  • 2.
    Challenges in ResearchAssessment: A funder’s view (ish)
  • 3.
    Wellcome Trust  Spendapproximately £700 million on research per year on biomedicine & societal context  Wide range of funding schemes supporting people, places, teams, innovation
  • 4.
    Funders’ challenge part1: who & what to fund?  Person - track record; potential  Idea – fit with strategic focus? excellent? new thinking?  Environment/place  Team/collaborators
  • 5.
    who & whatto fund: toolkit
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Funders’ challenge part2: did we make right decision?  Understanding ‘scientific’ progress & impact  Should we fund further?  Did it help to achieve organisation’s goals & strategy?
  • 8.
    did we makeright decision: toolkit  Markers of research progress & impact (qualitative & quantitative)  Measure of use & re-use  Use of proxies
  • 9.
    Challenge of impact Impactis defined as ‘any effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’ HEFCE 2014
  • 10.
    Impact is definedas ‘any effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’ HEFCE 2014 Challenge of impact do we measure what counts or count what we can measure?
  • 11.
    o Building infrastructureto provide ‘evidence’ & insight  Automated ‘evidence’ gathering  System connectors  Standards & definitions o Ability to consider wider range of research contributions & products: ‘beyond authorship’ o Research on research (‘science of science’) Steps towards more greater insight …

Editor's Notes

  • #4 3
  • #5 4
  • #6 5
  • #8 7
  • #9 Markers of researcher progress & impact (qualitative & quantitative) Measure of use & re-use Use of proxies – as precision difficult & unknowns (impact ‘measurement’ not an exact science) – but we need the data to build the story.
  • #12 11