This document summarizes several learning theories: 1) Classical/recollection theory proposed by Socrates, Plato, and Locke posits that learning involves recalling innate knowledge. Plato believed learning is recollection, while Locke saw the mind as a blank slate shaped by experience. 2) Behaviorism, developed in response to failures of earlier theories, views learning as changes in observable behavior caused by environmental stimuli. Pavlov's classical conditioning, Thorndike's law of effect, and Skinner's operant conditioning were influential behaviorist concepts. 3) Behaviorism informed instructional design by emphasizing measurable outcomes through behavioral objectives, task analysis, and criterion-referenced assessment.

1. Nevine Kamal/ CEP 800
Synthesis Paper/ Learning theories
Final project
Interaction 1
Classical/Recollection learning theory
Socrates, Plato, Locke
This paper synthesizes the development of the learning theories, in particular recollection/
classical learning theory, behaviorism, cognitivism/constructivism, and social constructivism.
Understanding the learning theories allows the educators/ instructional technologists to find the
strategies and tactics in each for effective learning.
To start with, it is necessary to highlight the main aspects of the classical/recollection
theory of learning. The most eminent figures for this theory are Socrates, Plato, and Locke.
Socrates developed a philosophy which gained the attention and respect everywhere. For
Socrates, Athens became the classroom. He went about asking questions of authorities and of the
man in the street in order to arrive at political and ethical truths. He questioned groups of his
students as a means of teaching, to force them to think a problem through to a logical conclusion.
His method of investigating problems through dialogue and discussions came to be known as the
Socratic Method. It asserted that learning is the on the lookout for of truth in matters, and it
occurs after questioning and interpreting the wisdom and knowledge of others. Skills and
knowledge are acquired by: interpreting, testing, examining the knowledge or wisdom of others,
learning from those who are wise, and examining oneself.
Influences by Socrates, Plato came up with much more defined theory of learning. Plato’s theory
postulated that what appears to be learning something new is just recollecting something already
known. According to Plato, all forms of knowledge are preexistent in our memory and are innate.
Therefore, learning is the process of recalling what the soul has already seen and absorbed.
Consequently, teaching for Plato is simply helping the remembering process.
Plato valued abstract reasoning and consequently, the person who is trained to reason clearly
would be more likely to escape from the “cave of ignorance and see truth by using his mind”.
This explanation would be applicable for many types of explorations such as empirical inquiry.
This theory may not be appropriate or applicable to answer non-empirical questions when there
aren’t any standard procedures for getting the answers. In other words how could the soul learn
by observing unless it already knew something? Hence, we still need to ask where knowledge
comes from.
Locke tried to answer the above mentioned question two thousand years after Plato. Locke
shared some of Plato’s assumptions but disagreed with him about others. For Locke, knowledge

2. is not innate. Yet, he believed that something had to be present for the child to be able to learn.
Infants come to the world with a mind void of knowledge like an “empty cabinet”. The blank
tablet or cabinet states that mind is clear of ideas and that is shaped and molded by the
environment and experiences it faces and encounters. According to Locke, each experience a
human faces contributes to how a person perceives the world around him/her and that is why
people see the world differently. Therefore, for Locke, if one does not have certain experiences,
he/she will lack the related simple ideas and thus there might be deficiencies in the complex
ideas an individual can build up. According to Locke, the newborn baby knows nothing but it
starts to have experience of its environment via its senses. Along with its senses, the child will
use the powers of combination and abstraction to build up complex ideas. To conclude,
according to Locke, experience is derived from two sources: simple ideas created by our
interaction with a sensory world and simple ideas developed out by observations concerning the
observations of our minds as concentration, puzzlement, love, and etc.
To sum up, Plato and Locke shared the passive picture of learning during the early stages of
acquiring knowledge. They both believed that something had to be present for the child to be
able to learn. For Plato, the learner is recollecting existing innate knowledge by remembering it,
and for Locke, the mind is like an empty cabinet waiting to be filled by encountering different
experiences. Furthermore, to Plato and Locke, experience is something that happens to the
learner. This idea has been argued against by many theorists who believed that experience is
something that a learner engages in, and thus, learning occurs as a result of interaction between
the learner and his/her surrounding.
Instructional implications
Locke asserted that at birth the human’s mind is a blank slate, or tabula rasa, and empty of ideas.
We acquire knowledge from the information about the objects in the world that our senses bring
to us. We begin with simple ideas and then combine them into more complex ones. Locke
believed that children obtain information most easily when they first consider simple ideas and
then increasingly combine them into more complex ones. Locke recommended realistic learning
to prepare people to manage their social, economic, and political affairs efficiently. He believed
that a sound education began in early childhood and insisted that the teaching of reading, writing,
and math should be gradual and cumulative. This idea is very much similar to the modern
concept of scaffolding. This idea of holistic education did not explain how learning occurs, what
happens in the mind of the learner, what factors influence learning, and the role of memory.

3. Interaction 2
Behaviorism
Pavlov, Thorndike, and Skinner
Since the above mentioned concepts failed to give a clear definition of learning and what
happens in the learner’s mind, here came a need to relate learning with the environmental forces.
Hence, the behaviorist approach was developed.
Behaviorism operates on the principle of “stimulus-response.” All behavior is caused by external
stimuli (operant conditioning). All behavior can be explained without the need to consider
internal mental states or consciousness. Early behaviorist work was done with animals (e.g.
Pavlov’s dogs, Thorndike’s puzzle, and Skinner’s rat) and then generalized to humans.
Behaviorism assumes that a learner is essentially passive, responding to environmental stimuli.
The learner starts off as a blank slate and a behavior is shaped through positive reinforcement or
negative reinforcement.
Both positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement increase the chance that the antecedent
behavior will happen again. In contrast, punishment (both positive and negative) decreases the
possibility that the antecedent behavior will happen again. Positive indicates the application of a
stimulus; Negative indicates the withholding of a stimulus. Learning is therefore defined as a
change in behavior in the learner.
The main key concepts in the behaviorism are classical conditioning, operate conditioning, and
law of effect.
To begin with, let’s consider Pavlov and his notion of classical conditioning. The basic
experiment he conducted had to do with associations. Every time Pavlov would feed his dog, he
would ring a bell. After a period of time the dog learnt to associate the ringing of the bell with
feeding time. Even when it wasn't time for food, Pavlov would ring the bell and the dog would
come and salivate (thinks it is dinner time) this is because the dog has learnt to associate the
ringing of the bell with feeding time.
This is called classical conditioning. In classical conditioning a stimulus that already leads to a
response is replaced by a different stimulus. In terms of Pavlov's dog (classical conditioning) this
meant replacing the smell of food, as the stimulus that leads to salivation, with the sound of a
bell instead so that eventually even with the sound of the bell alone the dog has 'learned' to
salivate.
After Pavlov, Thorndike proposed the concept law of effect. This required the subject do
something in response to a reflex before a reward is given. This type of contingency is called
response-stimulus. Thorndike was also famous for his puzzle boxes where in a series of isolated
trials he would put a cat inside one and in order for the cat to escape, it must perform anywhere
from a single task to a series of tasks. Thorndike came up with the Law of Effect which states

4. that a response that is followed by pleasant effects will be repeated and a response that is
followed by unpleasant effects won't.
Then, Skinner – father of behaviorism- developed further this notion and came up with operant
conditioning and that is you teach yourself through trial and error or through rewards. An
example of this notion is Skinner's rats. Skinner had some rats in a cage at which he never fed.
After a while the rat discovered a button in the cage, when it pressed it food came out and into
the cage. The rat had learnt to press the button in order to get food so would do so every time it
was to be fed. In other words, operant conditioning is a form of learning in which responses that
are usually voluntary are controlled by their consequences.
To sum up, behaviorism is characterized by outward expression of new behaviors. This approach
focuses only on observable behaviors. Learning, according to this approach, is context
independent. The behaviorist teacher advocates the notion of reward and punishment as a means
of learning. The teacher is the main source of knowledge as students have passive role. They are
just receipts of knowledge. Finally, it is highly structured.
Behaviorism is and instructional design:
o Emphasizing producing measurable outcomes in students- behavioral objectives, task
analysis, criterion-reference assessment,
o Pre-assessing students to determine where instruction should begin,
o Emphasizing mastering small steps before progressing to more complex levels of
performance,
o Using rewards, positive and negative reinforcement,
Criticism of behaviorism
Though was quite famous, the behaviorist approach revealed some drawbacks, such as:
It did not consider for the processes taking place in the mind of the learner and cannot be
observed. Furthermore, it postulated the notion that one size fits all. It did not consider individual
differences and mixed abilities classes. For the behaviorists, knowledge is given through
program instruction. Most importantly, it advocated teacher –centered classroom.

5. Interaction 3
Cognitivism/ constructivism
Gestalt, Kohler, Dewey, Piaget
Cognitivism grew in response to behaviorism. In contrast to behaviorism that focused on external
observable behavior because it considered the mind as a blank box, constructivist approach got
inside the box and tried to explain the inner structures and processes of learning.
Constructivism is the idea that learning does not happen by traditional teaching methods. That is
the teacher is not the only source of knowledge. The teacher doesn’t stand in front of the class
and lectures. This theory can by summarized using Confucius quote, “I hear and I forget. I see
and I remember. I do and I understand.”
According to the cognitivism, knowledge is stored cognitively as symbols, and in such case
learning is the process of connecting symbols in a meaningful and memorable way. Thus,
cognitive studies focused on the mental processes that facilitate symbol connection
Constructivism as a learning theory developed from the work of Gestalt, Kohler, Dewey, Piaget,
Vygotsky, and Bruner. With the rise of culture, two perspectives prevailed:
constructivism/cognitivism and social constructivism.
Constructivism initially evolved from the work of Piaget. It conceptualizes learning as the result
of constructing meaning based on the individual’s experiences and prior knowledge-schema. The
two cognitive theories to be considered are the Insight theory of Gestalt and Piaget’s
developmental stage theory.
Gestalt -who initially developed the cognitive learning theory- believed that the whole is more
than the sum of the parts. Gestalt and Kohler others focused on the concept of totality. Gestalt-
whose work is consider the corner stone for the cognitivism- emerged as a reaction to the
behaviorist theories of Pavlov and Watson which focused on mechanical stimulus-response
behavior. The term "Gestalt" refers to any pattern or organized whole.
Then Kohler took a further step and emphasized that one must examine the whole to discover
what its natural parts are, and not proceed from smaller elements into wholes. Kohler proposed
the view that insight follows from the characteristics of objects under consideration. His theory
suggested that learning could occur by "sudden comprehension" as opposed to gradual
understanding. This could occur without reinforcement, and once it occurs, no review, training,
or investigation are necessary. Significantly, insight is not necessarily observable by another
person.

6. Gestalt, Kohler and others asserted the importance of organizational processes of perception,
learning, and problem solving. They believed that individuals were inclined to organize
information in particular ways. The fundamental thoughts of Gestalt psychology are: Perception
is often different from reality- including optical illusions; the whole is more than the sum of its
parts. Gestalt and his psychologists believed that human experience cannot be explained unless
the overall experience is examined instead of individual parts of experience; the organism is
prone to arrange experience in particular ways. For example, the law of proximity is that people
tend to perceive as a unit those things that are close together in space.
Very much influenced by Gestalt, Piaget developed the cognitive theory from a biological
perspective. Along with the idea of schema or prior knowledge, Piaget proposed two major
principles play role in the intellectual growth and development: adaptation assimilation and
accommodation. He asserted that children are active learners who constructed new knowledge as
they developed cognitively through different stages of learning building on what they already
know. Piaget emphasized that older children think qualitatively differently from younger
children and this is because all children have to go through the same developmental stages:
sensorimotor, pre-operational, concrete operational stage, and formal operational stage.
Piaget confirmed that the development that occurs is resulted from maturation of the brain and
the nervous system, on one hand. And the experiences that help children adapt to new
environment, on the other hand. In other words, during all developmental stages, the child
experiences his/her own environment using whatever mental maps he/she has constructed so far.
Therefore, the child builds cognitive structures through mental and concept maps.
Techniques in the Cognitive approach
active involvement of the learner,
hierarchical analyses to identify and illustrate prerequisite relationships,
structuring, organizing and sequencing information to facilitate optimal processing
Learning environments that allow and encourage students to make connections with
previously learned material- recall of prerequisite skills, use of relevant examples,
analogies.
Cognitivism seems to be more about making knowledge more meaningful by helping learners
link it to existing knowledge. Learning needs to be more tailored to the learners’ needs and
abilities.

7. Interaction 4
Social constructivism
Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Gardner
Though it gained considerable fame, the main setback of the cognitivism is that it does not
account enough for individuality. In addition, it places little emphasis on affective
characteristics.
Since the work of the cognitivists neglected the role of culture in the learning process, there was
a need to develop the concept of social constructivism. Social constructivism grew from the
work of Vygotsky as well as others. The social constructivists believed that learning occurs via
the construction of meaning in social interaction as well as cultural interaction, and through
language.
Piaget is one of the great pioneers of the cognitive and social constructivist approach. Having
point out the role of Piaget in the above mentioned approach, it is necessary to point out the role
of vygotsky in developing the social constructivist approach further. Vygotsky criticized Piaget’s
theory because it underestimated the importance of culture. Vygotsky claimed that in some
situations complex skills can be acquired easily once simpler pre-requisite skills have been
acquired. He also underestimated the ability of some children. That is some children can perform
and achieve better results than other children at the same age. Finally, most importantly, he
underestimated-if not overlooked- the importance of culture. Vygotsky developed the social
constructivist approach that asserted the importance of culture in the child’s development. He
suggested that a child’s cultural upbringing affects the learning development. Vygotsky claimed
that different contexts create different forms of development. Therefore, the cognitive processes-
language, thought, and reasoning- develop through social interaction. Vygotsly emphasized the
role of social interaction and instruction through the concept of Zone of proximal development
(ZPD). The Zone of Proximal development acts as a scaffolding procedure that assists the child
to learn. To conclude, Piaget viewed language as just another representational system that is
underdeveloped until the ages of 6/7. Vygotsky, on the other hand, viewed language as a social
and communicative component in the child’s development.
Bruner was very much influenced by Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s work. Bruner’s work highlights
similarities as well as differences with Piaget and Vygotsky.
In terms of similarities with Piaget, Bruner emphasizes the socio-cognitive stage theory. This
theory focused on enactive mode, iconic mode, symbolic mode, and abstract thinking which are
developed out of concrete thinking.

8. In terms of similarities with Vygotsky, Bruner claims that interpersonal communication is
necessary for development. Development here relies on active intervention of experts through
scaffolding and contingency rule.
In terms of differences, Bruner took a further step and stressed the role of language in child’s
learning development. Bruner points out that without language, thought is limited. Not only this,
but language forms the basis of understanding.
In summary, Bruner embraced the notion of socio-cognitive stage theory which is based on
interaction with adults. Not only this, but also emphasized on adults developing reciprocal
behavior with the child.
Yet there were some drawback and criticism to this approach such as, knowledge is neither given
nor absolute, often seen as less rigorous than traditional approaches, and does not fit well with
traditional age grouping and rigid learning context.
Therefore, grew out of the social constructivism, and framed around meta-cognition the approach
of multiple intelligences was brought to light.
Gardener developed multiple intelligences approach in response to the social constructivism
and asserted that all people are born with eight intelligences: verbal-linguistic, visual spatial,
logical-mathematical, musical, naturalistic, and interpersonal. The multiple intelligences in the
classroom focused on the delivery of instruction through multiple mediums, student-centered
learning environment authentic assessment, and finally self-directed learning.
Finally, I believe that learning takes place in different ways, at different levels, and at different times in a
person’s life. Therefore, there are benefits associated with all the learning theories that were
discussed. Hence, the role of instructional technologist is to adopt an eclectic approach and find
what works and use it bearing in mind learners, contexts, and different learning theories.
Instructional technologist should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the learning
theories and try to optimize their use in appropriate instructional design strategy.