This document summarizes the planning and rationale for a creative teaching week focused on local history. The planning incorporated theories of creative and experiential learning. An initial lesson focused on familiarizing students with the local area through maps and activities. A field trip introduced the topic of the Pendle Witches trials. Students were then asked to research and present their findings, though the quality of work was lower than expected. Reflection led the teacher to conclude more scaffolding would benefit students in subsequent lessons. The overarching goal was to engage students through an interactive, skills-focused approach aligned with theories of creative pedagogy.
The document discusses key principles for 21st century teaching and learning, including personalizing learning to each student's needs and talents, creating an inclusive environment that celebrates diversity, and reshaping curriculum to focus on skills like problem solving and critical thinking. It reflects on challenges of implementing these changes, such as managing diverse classrooms and ensuring teachers have adequate support, but emphasizes that a one-size-fits-all education does not prepare students for the changing world. The reflective essay advocates for an interconnected, student-centered curriculum that leverages technology to facilitate self-paced and collaborative learning.
The document provides teaching tips from Donald J. Liu. It discusses 5 key elements of effective teaching:
1) Overcoming limitations by transforming weaknesses into strengths, such as compensating for being a non-native English speaker.
2) Engaging students through active learning techniques like using clickers and group work rather than solely lecturing.
3) Building rapport with students by learning their names and treating them with respect.
4) Seeking out new teaching methods and frontier areas, such as using classroom experiments with clicker technology.
5) Maximizing the "theater" aspect of teaching through strong preparation and presentation skills.
This document discusses and compares cooperative learning and collaborative learning. It defines cooperative learning as students working together in small groups to achieve a common academic goal, with each member responsible for their own learning and helping others. Collaborative learning is defined as two or more people learning together through group work and discussion. The document outlines the basic assumptions, approaches, procedures, and advantages of cooperative learning, as well as the features, instructional phases, applications, and advantages of collaborative learning. It concludes that both are important constructivist instructional methods that are more time consuming than traditional methods.
53 Interesting Things to Do in LecturesMann Rentoy
This document provides 53 ideas for making lectures more engaging and effective. It is divided into 8 chapters that cover topics such as structuring the lecturing process, improving students' notes, using handouts, linking lectures, holding attention, active learning during lectures, and checking on learning. For each idea, the document identifies an issue and proposes a practical teaching or learning method to address it. The overall goal is to help educators broaden their repertoire of pedagogical techniques for professional and higher education.
Collaborative learning involves students working together in groups to maximize their own and each other's learning. It emphasizes interdependence among group members and positive interpersonal interactions. Cooperative learning also involves students working in groups but is more teacher-centered, with the teacher maintaining control of the class. Some key differences between collaborative and cooperative learning include collaborative learning beginning with mutual trust while cooperative learning begins with mutual respect, and collaborative learning involving generating entirely new ideas together versus cooperative learning focusing on sharing ideas. Engaging students in collaborative learning can create a positive classroom atmosphere by developing relationships and problem-solving skills among students. Effective strategies for collaborative learning include helping students understand benefits, guiding them through team-building stages, establishing expectations, and designing conflict
The document discusses the need to reinvent teaching strategies to make them more student-centered in the modern context of globalization. It advocates for equipping students with skills like critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. It proposes several innovative teaching methods like cooperative learning, role-playing, project-based learning, mind mapping and using humor to aid retention. These methods aim to make students active participants in learning and develop skills beyond traditional instruction.
This document discusses various collaborative activities and tools that can be used to build classroom community and encourage active learning. It recommends getting to know students' names, welcoming questions, and using group activities. Specific collaborative techniques described include think-pair-share, group projects, case-based learning, jigsaw activities, and checklist for creating collaborative activities. Web-based collaboration tools like Google Docs, Stixy and Popplet are also mentioned. The overall message is that collaborative learning allows students to take responsibility for learning together and has benefits for motivation, critical thinking, and knowledge development.
This document discusses John Hattie's concept of "Know Thy Impact" and how teachers can maximize their impact on student learning. It suggests that teachers should ensure students know the learning intentions, what success will look like, and strategies they can use to be successful. When teachers make the learning goals clear and provide appropriate challenges and feedback, students are better able to drive their own learning. The document promotes the use of Understanding by Design framework and lists resources on Visible Learning and Hattie's research on instructional strategies that significantly improve student achievement.
The document discusses key principles for 21st century teaching and learning, including personalizing learning to each student's needs and talents, creating an inclusive environment that celebrates diversity, and reshaping curriculum to focus on skills like problem solving and critical thinking. It reflects on challenges of implementing these changes, such as managing diverse classrooms and ensuring teachers have adequate support, but emphasizes that a one-size-fits-all education does not prepare students for the changing world. The reflective essay advocates for an interconnected, student-centered curriculum that leverages technology to facilitate self-paced and collaborative learning.
The document provides teaching tips from Donald J. Liu. It discusses 5 key elements of effective teaching:
1) Overcoming limitations by transforming weaknesses into strengths, such as compensating for being a non-native English speaker.
2) Engaging students through active learning techniques like using clickers and group work rather than solely lecturing.
3) Building rapport with students by learning their names and treating them with respect.
4) Seeking out new teaching methods and frontier areas, such as using classroom experiments with clicker technology.
5) Maximizing the "theater" aspect of teaching through strong preparation and presentation skills.
This document discusses and compares cooperative learning and collaborative learning. It defines cooperative learning as students working together in small groups to achieve a common academic goal, with each member responsible for their own learning and helping others. Collaborative learning is defined as two or more people learning together through group work and discussion. The document outlines the basic assumptions, approaches, procedures, and advantages of cooperative learning, as well as the features, instructional phases, applications, and advantages of collaborative learning. It concludes that both are important constructivist instructional methods that are more time consuming than traditional methods.
53 Interesting Things to Do in LecturesMann Rentoy
This document provides 53 ideas for making lectures more engaging and effective. It is divided into 8 chapters that cover topics such as structuring the lecturing process, improving students' notes, using handouts, linking lectures, holding attention, active learning during lectures, and checking on learning. For each idea, the document identifies an issue and proposes a practical teaching or learning method to address it. The overall goal is to help educators broaden their repertoire of pedagogical techniques for professional and higher education.
Collaborative learning involves students working together in groups to maximize their own and each other's learning. It emphasizes interdependence among group members and positive interpersonal interactions. Cooperative learning also involves students working in groups but is more teacher-centered, with the teacher maintaining control of the class. Some key differences between collaborative and cooperative learning include collaborative learning beginning with mutual trust while cooperative learning begins with mutual respect, and collaborative learning involving generating entirely new ideas together versus cooperative learning focusing on sharing ideas. Engaging students in collaborative learning can create a positive classroom atmosphere by developing relationships and problem-solving skills among students. Effective strategies for collaborative learning include helping students understand benefits, guiding them through team-building stages, establishing expectations, and designing conflict
The document discusses the need to reinvent teaching strategies to make them more student-centered in the modern context of globalization. It advocates for equipping students with skills like critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. It proposes several innovative teaching methods like cooperative learning, role-playing, project-based learning, mind mapping and using humor to aid retention. These methods aim to make students active participants in learning and develop skills beyond traditional instruction.
This document discusses various collaborative activities and tools that can be used to build classroom community and encourage active learning. It recommends getting to know students' names, welcoming questions, and using group activities. Specific collaborative techniques described include think-pair-share, group projects, case-based learning, jigsaw activities, and checklist for creating collaborative activities. Web-based collaboration tools like Google Docs, Stixy and Popplet are also mentioned. The overall message is that collaborative learning allows students to take responsibility for learning together and has benefits for motivation, critical thinking, and knowledge development.
This document discusses John Hattie's concept of "Know Thy Impact" and how teachers can maximize their impact on student learning. It suggests that teachers should ensure students know the learning intentions, what success will look like, and strategies they can use to be successful. When teachers make the learning goals clear and provide appropriate challenges and feedback, students are better able to drive their own learning. The document promotes the use of Understanding by Design framework and lists resources on Visible Learning and Hattie's research on instructional strategies that significantly improve student achievement.
This document discusses reflection and metacognition in education. It provides guidance for teachers on developing reflective practices in their classrooms. Some key points include:
- Reflective learning involves thinking about one's own thinking and learning processes. It helps students strengthen their ability to learn.
- Teachers should model reflective thinking, ask reflective questions, and train students to reflect routinely. Regular reflection helps teachers and students evaluate and improve the teaching and learning process.
- Reflection requires making time for it, planning opportunities for students to reflect, and teaching reflective techniques. It benefits learning when used before, during and after lessons.
This document provides an overview of the ReTeach program, which focuses on teaching and learning in higher education. It includes Chinese proverbs about learning, principles of good teaching, theories of teaching, and frameworks for constructive alignment between learning outcomes, teaching methods, and assessment. The goal of ReTeach is to involve students and teachers in the learning process through active and social learning experiences, clear expectations, feedback, and reflection on teaching practices. References are provided for further reading on quality learning and teaching in higher education.
This document discusses three hypotheses related to improving student learning:
1. Teachers who create a positive learning environment will positively impact student learning. A positive environment includes both physical (seating arrangements) and social elements.
2. Students who are more motivated will learn better. Intrinsic motivation leads to better outcomes than extrinsic motivation. Teachers can help develop student intrinsic motivation.
3. Learners learn best when teaching and learning styles are congruent. However, research findings are mixed and it is better for teachers to address a variety of styles through active learning.
The document analyzes each hypothesis, provides relevant research, and suggests recommendations for the teacher in the scenario to improve student learning based on the hypotheses
This document discusses several modern instructional approaches for cooperative and collaborative learning: jigsaw technique, circle learning, concept mapping, and think-pair-share. It provides details on how each approach works, including step-by-step explanations of implementing the jigsaw technique and the four steps of circle learning (reflection, learning, planning, action). It also discusses the purposes and uses of concept mapping and think-pair-share techniques. The document concludes that organizing students into heterogeneous groups for particular learning experiences has been shown to be an effective technique that allows for varying degrees of student success through interaction and teacher-planned activities.
The document discusses how the Modern Learning Canvas was used at a school to develop teacher pedagogical capacity. The Canvas breaks teaching down into 9 essential components - learner role, strategies, enablers, etc. - to visually map approaches. It was initially used to map a digital coaching role but missed connections between components. Over time, the school got better at using it to redefine pedagogy, like shifting a course from a didactic to inquiry-based approach. Comparing models and profiling ideal learners helps validate new approaches and increase pedagogical intelligence. The school is now using it to continually improve teaching and learning.
This document discusses appropriate task development and classroom management for independent learners. It summarizes an observation of a Year 7 Social World class where tasks were well-designed to promote independent learning. The tasks required students to research different religions in groups and present their findings, engaging higher-order thinking skills. The document also discusses how clear expectations and consistent enforcement of rules are necessary for an effective learning environment and student motivation. Overall, it argues that task design and classroom management are interrelated - tasks must be appropriately challenging, and management is needed to allow tasks to be successfully completed.
The document summarizes an action research study investigating the effects of cooperative learning groups in a middle school mathematics classroom. The study collected data on how cooperative learning groups affected students' math scores, oral and written communication, and attitudes toward mathematics. Key findings included:
- Students' attitudes toward mathematics generally improved with the use of cooperative learning groups, though some students still preferred to work alone.
- The inclusion of cooperative learning groups led to improved oral explanations of solutions and written expression among students.
- As a result of positive findings, the teacher plans to continue incorporating cooperative learning groups in the middle school math classroom.
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...CPEDInitiative
This document describes Academic Parent-Teacher Teams (APTT), an intervention to improve family engagement and student academic outcomes. APTT involves three team meetings and one individual session per year where teachers share student data and demonstrate learning activities for parents to practice at home. A pilot of APTT in nine Phoenix schools saw first grade reading fluency increase from an average of 17 words per minute to 46, nearing the end of year standard of 62. Both quantitative and qualitative findings showed increased parent-teacher communication and engagement, as well as improved student achievement. The implications are that teachers can effectively lead family involvement efforts and incorporate it as a core instructional strategy.
The document summarizes effective teaching practices shared by award-winning secondary teachers. It discusses six common practices: 1) "chunking" content into logical segments, 2) creating student buy-in and choice in lessons, 3) providing a safe classroom environment, 4) developing lessons incorporating different learning styles, 5) encouraging higher-level thinking, and 6) building student relationships. It provides examples of how teachers implement these practices, such as breaking down complex sentences, using jigsaw groups, and establishing sustained silent reading time.
This document discusses applying cognitive motivational theories in a high school art class to increase student motivation and self-determination. It summarizes key theories like expectancy-value theory, self-efficacy theory, goal theory, attribution theory, and self-determination theory. The teacher aims to build students' competence and autonomy through modeling, positive feedback, clear goals, and focusing on effort over ability. While some students remain discouraged, the teacher works to "re-train" negative views of art and ability through challenging yet achievable projects and emphasizing mastery over performance.
CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN ENGAGING STUDENTS (July 2)Mann Rentoy
This document discusses strategies for enhancing student engagement in the new normal of online learning. It begins by defining student engagement as having behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions that operate interdependently. Research finds that online learning can negatively impact student performance. The document emphasizes that student engagement requires more than just enjoyment and should involve intellectually challenging learning, making connections, and self-regulation. It stresses the importance of the teacher-student relationship and allowing student choice, while providing timely feedback. A variety of pedagogical approaches, including expository, interactive, and independent practice are recommended when teaching online.
The document discusses breaking down subject boundaries through interdisciplinary teaching at an international school. It outlines the background of moving from a traditional subject-focused model to a more holistic interdisciplinary approach. Key steps included surveying teachers, defining interdisciplinary learning, collaboratively planning cross-subject units, and addressing staffing and timetabling to better support the new approach. Initial interdisciplinary units integrated subjects like English and performing arts, science and technology, and maths and visual art. The changes aim to improve student understanding through purposeful, integrated learning across disciplines.
Resilient and adaptive schools have three key characteristics:
1. They focus on collaboration where small insights and observations are shared, which can lead to major changes in teaching and learning.
2. They look for patterns in student and teacher behavior rather than just stories, to better understand the school as an ecosystem.
3. They problem-solve collaboratively and prototype solutions, going for workable solutions with commitment.
Collaborative learning and cooperative learning are similar but have some key differences:
- Collaborative learning is a philosophy that respects each individual's contributions, while cooperative learning is a structured way for a group to accomplish a specific goal or task.
- The teacher facilitates but does not control collaborative learning, while in cooperative learning the teacher maintains more control over the process and may assign specific roles, tasks or products.
- Both approaches can be effective for language learning by encouraging communication, sharing of ideas, and long-term retention when used appropriately for the level and topic.
Peer tutoring involves pairing students, usually with a higher-level student helping a lower-level student. This helps deepen understanding as students discuss concepts and use scaffolding techniques. Peer tutoring increases engagement and helps students progress in their zone of proximal development. It benefits skills in literacy, reading comprehension, and subject areas like algebra. Positives are that students learn from each other, enhance their skills, and take control of their learning. Negatives can include lack of focus or progress between students. Sources discussed show peer tutoring shifts teacher and student roles, and enhances student motivation through interaction.
This document discusses developing a learning-focused curriculum and school environment. It emphasizes cultivating deep learning goals and skills like collaboration, problem-solving, creativity and resilience in students. It advocates giving schools freedom over their curriculum design while maintaining a national minimum standard. Various learning approaches are mentioned, like performance, project and problem-based learning. Developing student autonomy and celebrating successes are priorities. The highest performing education systems internationally are looked to for curriculum guidance.
This document discusses teacher burnout and maintaining teacher enthusiasm. It notes that teacher attrition rates are generally high, with 30-40% leaving within 5 years, partly due to burnout. Burned out teachers remaining in the profession can be problematic as they may experience physical and mental stress symptoms. Burnout can spread between teachers as negative emotions are adopted. The document examines sources of teacher stress like workload, student behavior, and lack of support. Prolonged stress can lead to burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Developing self-efficacy and resiliency can help prevent burnout.
PowerPoint presentation for the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association and Taiwan Education Research Association Conference in Kaohsiung, Taiwan on 10 - 12 November, 2016.
This document discusses cooperative learning and its use in college classrooms. It begins by outlining the objectives of the workshop, which are to define cooperative learning, discuss the research supporting it, identify elements and strategies of cooperative learning, and discuss challenges in applying it. The document then covers defining cooperative learning, comparing traditional and cooperative methods, reviewing research findings, and identifying reasons to use cooperative learning like increased achievement and motivation. It also outlines elements like interdependence, interaction, accountability, skills, and processing. Finally, it discusses grouping patterns like informal short-term groups and formal long-term project groups.
Teacher qualities for 21st century learningWongWengSiong
This article discusses qualities needed for teachers in the 21st century based on interviews with six teachers. It focuses on mindsets of openness to change, growth, and adapting to new knowledge and challenges. Key qualities that emerged were adventure, resilience, creativity, and problem-solving. The interviews were conducted over two years using a narrative inquiry approach to understand the teachers' experiences and perspectives. The study aimed to understand how teachers' lives shape their practices and abilities to meet changing needs of students in the future.
The document summarizes research supporting differentiated instruction as a model for addressing increasing student diversity in classrooms. It discusses Vygotsky's sociocultural theory of learning and zone of proximal development as providing a conceptual framework. Research highlights the need to consider individual differences in learning styles, intelligence, and brain functioning. Traditional uniform instruction fails to meet the needs of diverse students. Differentiated instruction allows teachers to accommodate variations through flexible grouping, content, process, and product.
This document discusses reflection and metacognition in education. It provides guidance for teachers on developing reflective practices in their classrooms. Some key points include:
- Reflective learning involves thinking about one's own thinking and learning processes. It helps students strengthen their ability to learn.
- Teachers should model reflective thinking, ask reflective questions, and train students to reflect routinely. Regular reflection helps teachers and students evaluate and improve the teaching and learning process.
- Reflection requires making time for it, planning opportunities for students to reflect, and teaching reflective techniques. It benefits learning when used before, during and after lessons.
This document provides an overview of the ReTeach program, which focuses on teaching and learning in higher education. It includes Chinese proverbs about learning, principles of good teaching, theories of teaching, and frameworks for constructive alignment between learning outcomes, teaching methods, and assessment. The goal of ReTeach is to involve students and teachers in the learning process through active and social learning experiences, clear expectations, feedback, and reflection on teaching practices. References are provided for further reading on quality learning and teaching in higher education.
This document discusses three hypotheses related to improving student learning:
1. Teachers who create a positive learning environment will positively impact student learning. A positive environment includes both physical (seating arrangements) and social elements.
2. Students who are more motivated will learn better. Intrinsic motivation leads to better outcomes than extrinsic motivation. Teachers can help develop student intrinsic motivation.
3. Learners learn best when teaching and learning styles are congruent. However, research findings are mixed and it is better for teachers to address a variety of styles through active learning.
The document analyzes each hypothesis, provides relevant research, and suggests recommendations for the teacher in the scenario to improve student learning based on the hypotheses
This document discusses several modern instructional approaches for cooperative and collaborative learning: jigsaw technique, circle learning, concept mapping, and think-pair-share. It provides details on how each approach works, including step-by-step explanations of implementing the jigsaw technique and the four steps of circle learning (reflection, learning, planning, action). It also discusses the purposes and uses of concept mapping and think-pair-share techniques. The document concludes that organizing students into heterogeneous groups for particular learning experiences has been shown to be an effective technique that allows for varying degrees of student success through interaction and teacher-planned activities.
The document discusses how the Modern Learning Canvas was used at a school to develop teacher pedagogical capacity. The Canvas breaks teaching down into 9 essential components - learner role, strategies, enablers, etc. - to visually map approaches. It was initially used to map a digital coaching role but missed connections between components. Over time, the school got better at using it to redefine pedagogy, like shifting a course from a didactic to inquiry-based approach. Comparing models and profiling ideal learners helps validate new approaches and increase pedagogical intelligence. The school is now using it to continually improve teaching and learning.
This document discusses appropriate task development and classroom management for independent learners. It summarizes an observation of a Year 7 Social World class where tasks were well-designed to promote independent learning. The tasks required students to research different religions in groups and present their findings, engaging higher-order thinking skills. The document also discusses how clear expectations and consistent enforcement of rules are necessary for an effective learning environment and student motivation. Overall, it argues that task design and classroom management are interrelated - tasks must be appropriately challenging, and management is needed to allow tasks to be successfully completed.
The document summarizes an action research study investigating the effects of cooperative learning groups in a middle school mathematics classroom. The study collected data on how cooperative learning groups affected students' math scores, oral and written communication, and attitudes toward mathematics. Key findings included:
- Students' attitudes toward mathematics generally improved with the use of cooperative learning groups, though some students still preferred to work alone.
- The inclusion of cooperative learning groups led to improved oral explanations of solutions and written expression among students.
- As a result of positive findings, the teacher plans to continue incorporating cooperative learning groups in the middle school math classroom.
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...CPEDInitiative
This document describes Academic Parent-Teacher Teams (APTT), an intervention to improve family engagement and student academic outcomes. APTT involves three team meetings and one individual session per year where teachers share student data and demonstrate learning activities for parents to practice at home. A pilot of APTT in nine Phoenix schools saw first grade reading fluency increase from an average of 17 words per minute to 46, nearing the end of year standard of 62. Both quantitative and qualitative findings showed increased parent-teacher communication and engagement, as well as improved student achievement. The implications are that teachers can effectively lead family involvement efforts and incorporate it as a core instructional strategy.
The document summarizes effective teaching practices shared by award-winning secondary teachers. It discusses six common practices: 1) "chunking" content into logical segments, 2) creating student buy-in and choice in lessons, 3) providing a safe classroom environment, 4) developing lessons incorporating different learning styles, 5) encouraging higher-level thinking, and 6) building student relationships. It provides examples of how teachers implement these practices, such as breaking down complex sentences, using jigsaw groups, and establishing sustained silent reading time.
This document discusses applying cognitive motivational theories in a high school art class to increase student motivation and self-determination. It summarizes key theories like expectancy-value theory, self-efficacy theory, goal theory, attribution theory, and self-determination theory. The teacher aims to build students' competence and autonomy through modeling, positive feedback, clear goals, and focusing on effort over ability. While some students remain discouraged, the teacher works to "re-train" negative views of art and ability through challenging yet achievable projects and emphasizing mastery over performance.
CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN ENGAGING STUDENTS (July 2)Mann Rentoy
This document discusses strategies for enhancing student engagement in the new normal of online learning. It begins by defining student engagement as having behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions that operate interdependently. Research finds that online learning can negatively impact student performance. The document emphasizes that student engagement requires more than just enjoyment and should involve intellectually challenging learning, making connections, and self-regulation. It stresses the importance of the teacher-student relationship and allowing student choice, while providing timely feedback. A variety of pedagogical approaches, including expository, interactive, and independent practice are recommended when teaching online.
The document discusses breaking down subject boundaries through interdisciplinary teaching at an international school. It outlines the background of moving from a traditional subject-focused model to a more holistic interdisciplinary approach. Key steps included surveying teachers, defining interdisciplinary learning, collaboratively planning cross-subject units, and addressing staffing and timetabling to better support the new approach. Initial interdisciplinary units integrated subjects like English and performing arts, science and technology, and maths and visual art. The changes aim to improve student understanding through purposeful, integrated learning across disciplines.
Resilient and adaptive schools have three key characteristics:
1. They focus on collaboration where small insights and observations are shared, which can lead to major changes in teaching and learning.
2. They look for patterns in student and teacher behavior rather than just stories, to better understand the school as an ecosystem.
3. They problem-solve collaboratively and prototype solutions, going for workable solutions with commitment.
Collaborative learning and cooperative learning are similar but have some key differences:
- Collaborative learning is a philosophy that respects each individual's contributions, while cooperative learning is a structured way for a group to accomplish a specific goal or task.
- The teacher facilitates but does not control collaborative learning, while in cooperative learning the teacher maintains more control over the process and may assign specific roles, tasks or products.
- Both approaches can be effective for language learning by encouraging communication, sharing of ideas, and long-term retention when used appropriately for the level and topic.
Peer tutoring involves pairing students, usually with a higher-level student helping a lower-level student. This helps deepen understanding as students discuss concepts and use scaffolding techniques. Peer tutoring increases engagement and helps students progress in their zone of proximal development. It benefits skills in literacy, reading comprehension, and subject areas like algebra. Positives are that students learn from each other, enhance their skills, and take control of their learning. Negatives can include lack of focus or progress between students. Sources discussed show peer tutoring shifts teacher and student roles, and enhances student motivation through interaction.
This document discusses developing a learning-focused curriculum and school environment. It emphasizes cultivating deep learning goals and skills like collaboration, problem-solving, creativity and resilience in students. It advocates giving schools freedom over their curriculum design while maintaining a national minimum standard. Various learning approaches are mentioned, like performance, project and problem-based learning. Developing student autonomy and celebrating successes are priorities. The highest performing education systems internationally are looked to for curriculum guidance.
This document discusses teacher burnout and maintaining teacher enthusiasm. It notes that teacher attrition rates are generally high, with 30-40% leaving within 5 years, partly due to burnout. Burned out teachers remaining in the profession can be problematic as they may experience physical and mental stress symptoms. Burnout can spread between teachers as negative emotions are adopted. The document examines sources of teacher stress like workload, student behavior, and lack of support. Prolonged stress can lead to burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Developing self-efficacy and resiliency can help prevent burnout.
PowerPoint presentation for the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association and Taiwan Education Research Association Conference in Kaohsiung, Taiwan on 10 - 12 November, 2016.
This document discusses cooperative learning and its use in college classrooms. It begins by outlining the objectives of the workshop, which are to define cooperative learning, discuss the research supporting it, identify elements and strategies of cooperative learning, and discuss challenges in applying it. The document then covers defining cooperative learning, comparing traditional and cooperative methods, reviewing research findings, and identifying reasons to use cooperative learning like increased achievement and motivation. It also outlines elements like interdependence, interaction, accountability, skills, and processing. Finally, it discusses grouping patterns like informal short-term groups and formal long-term project groups.
Teacher qualities for 21st century learningWongWengSiong
This article discusses qualities needed for teachers in the 21st century based on interviews with six teachers. It focuses on mindsets of openness to change, growth, and adapting to new knowledge and challenges. Key qualities that emerged were adventure, resilience, creativity, and problem-solving. The interviews were conducted over two years using a narrative inquiry approach to understand the teachers' experiences and perspectives. The study aimed to understand how teachers' lives shape their practices and abilities to meet changing needs of students in the future.
The document summarizes research supporting differentiated instruction as a model for addressing increasing student diversity in classrooms. It discusses Vygotsky's sociocultural theory of learning and zone of proximal development as providing a conceptual framework. Research highlights the need to consider individual differences in learning styles, intelligence, and brain functioning. Traditional uniform instruction fails to meet the needs of diverse students. Differentiated instruction allows teachers to accommodate variations through flexible grouping, content, process, and product.
This document summarizes a research paper that examines the model of differentiated instruction. It provides background on differentiated instruction and the need to cater to increasingly diverse classrooms. The paper draws on Vygotsky's sociocultural theory of learning to provide a conceptual framework. Specifically, it discusses Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and the implications of his theory for teaching practices. A rationale for a new educational model is then presented, highlighting research on student diversity, learning styles, brain research, and multiple intelligences that support differentiated instruction.
The document discusses enabling pupils to have a voice in co-constructing the school curriculum. It describes how teachers can use action research and solution-focused communication to involve pupils as partners. Teachers treat pupils as "experts of their own lives" and listen to their perspectives to inform curriculum development. The chapter will examine how a solution-focused approach can help teachers increase their responsiveness to pupils' ideas and effectively incorporate their voices into curriculum planning.
This document summarizes a paper that discusses the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in teaching and learning. It addresses four main issues: 1) the tension between teaching about ICT versus teaching through ICT, 2) the persistence of teachers' pedagogical styles, 3) the importance of teacher confidence and competence with ICT, and 4) curriculum contradictions that can arise when incorporating ICT into established subject areas. The document emphasizes that ICT alone does not improve learning - it depends on how teachers integrate ICT into their pedagogical approaches and address challenges to existing teaching practices.
Defining Inquiry for the PreK-12 continuum. Inquiry as a 'theory of everything' of good education, built on a solid foundation of well-taught knowledge, skills and concepts.
The document discusses language barriers and cultural differences that can impact students' academic learning. Teachers need to be aware of these differences and address them to provide an environment where students can explore learning. Constructivist theories state that learning involves adding new knowledge to existing knowledge through experiences. For students to achieve academic success in a diverse society, teachers must respect differences and incorporate cognitive and social constructivist theories to meet students' developmental needs.
The document discusses authentic assessment for creativity as a 21st century pedagogy, noting that creativity involves generating novel and useful ideas through effective processes and environments. It examines how Singapore's Curriculum 2015 focuses on skills like critical and inventive thinking, and explores how teachers can better teach and assess these skills through authentic performance tasks that demonstrate real-world application of knowledge. Tensions that teachers may face in facilitating creativity are also discussed, as well as the need for teachers to shift from unilateral control to a mutual learning model in their own facilitation of creative thinking.
Paper on Authentic Assessment of Creativity and Change Leadership. Unpacking of the cognitive and affective domains of creative problem solving process based on the thinking skills model, the mapping to how we design, implement and assess 21st century competencies may path new thinking in the way we envision learning.
Development and modification of curriculum for excellence in teacher educationAlexander Decker
This document discusses the development and modification of curriculum for teacher education programs. It notes that teacher education curriculum needs to be regularly updated to keep pace with changes in the field of education. The key components of a modern teacher education curriculum and how to accommodate new areas like communication skills within the constraints of time are discussed. Several models of curriculum organization are also mentioned. The importance of making the teacher education curriculum responsive to changing needs and aligning it with principles of modern pedagogy is emphasized.
This document discusses using design thinking as a model for 21st century learning. It notes that today's students are digital natives who learn differently than in the past. Traditional education focuses too much on rote learning and testing. Design thinking allows for more active, collaborative, and creative learning that develops important 21st century skills. The document reviews how design thinking integrates both academic content and skills like problem-solving, empathy, and creativity. Teachers can adopt this approach to make learning more engaging and relevant for today's students. Key considerations include how to allocate time and resources for this model within existing school structures and supporting teachers to develop expertise in these new methods.
This document discusses task-based language learning (TBLL) and how it is implemented in the classroom. It notes that TBLL started gaining popularity in 1996 with Jane Willis' book on the topic. Traditionally, language learning followed a present-practice-perform (PPP) model, but TBLL proposes completing tasks as the basis for learning. Tasks can include information gap activities, problem-solving tasks, and jigsaw activities. The document also discusses the different steps in TBLL, including pre-task, task cycle, and language focus.
The document discusses the importance of instructional planning for teachers. It notes that instructional planning helps teachers identify essential principles and skills to focus on, recognize individual student needs and differences, and use ongoing assessment to adjust instruction as needed. Differentiated instruction through content, process, product, or environment allows teachers to tailor instruction to meet student needs.
Project-based learning is a comprehensive instructional approach where students collaborate on sustained investigations of real-world problems. It emphasizes cooperative learning over individual inquiry. Students construct artifacts to represent their learning and pursue solutions by asking questions, debating ideas, making predictions, designing experiments, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and communicating their findings. Projects have a driving question and culminated in meaningful products. While it has potential benefits for student learning and motivation, project-based learning requires support for teachers and consideration of student and teacher knowledge to be successfully implemented.
Project-based learning is a comprehensive instructional approach where students collaborate on sustained investigations of real-world problems. It differs from traditional inquiry by emphasizing cooperative learning and student construction of artifacts to represent their learning. Effective project-based learning involves students asking and refining questions, making predictions, designing experiments, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and communicating their findings. There are two essential components - a driving question that organizes activities into a meaningful project, and culminating products that address the question. Features include using a real-world problem across content areas and giving students opportunities to actively investigate concepts and represent their knowledge.
General overview of project based learning ppt finalParentsandPGCPS
Project-based learning is a comprehensive instructional approach where students collaborate on sustained investigations of real-world problems. It emphasizes cooperative learning over individual inquiry. Students construct artifacts to represent their learning and pursue solutions by asking questions, debating ideas, designing experiments, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and communicating their findings. There are two essential components - a driving question that organizes the project activities, and culminating products that address the question. Features include using a real-world problem across content areas and allowing active student investigations in multiple representations of knowledge. Support is needed for teachers and students as the complex approach requires significant motivation and knowledge to engage in difficult work.
This document discusses approaches to fostering creativity and professional development in initial teacher education. It presents an arts-infused model for designing classroom contexts and learning experiences that deliver subject content while developing students' core skills. The model incorporates using the natural and built environments, communications, school grounds, and social/cultural/historical contexts. Students reported enjoying participating in a graphic novel project turning a text into a storyboard, acting it out, and compiling it into a booklet. They recognized the value of incorporating creative learning approaches into their own future teaching.
Glen Coutts, WAAE presentation. Learning in Context: Creativity in EducationGlen Coutts
This document discusses approaches to fostering creativity and professional development in initial teacher education. It presents an arts-infused model for designing classroom contexts and learning experiences that deliver subject content while developing students' core skills. The model incorporates using the natural and built environments, communications, school grounds, and social/cultural/historical contexts. Students reported enjoying participating in a project where they adapted a book into a graphic novel by summarizing, acting out, photographing, and compiling it. They recognized the value of incorporating creative learning approaches.
This document discusses past and present paradigm shifts in education and explores potential future learning paradigms in light of entering the knowledge era. It notes that learning processes are still based on a content-driven paradigm but that information and communication technologies are profoundly impacting knowledge production and learning. Going forward, institutions should focus on enabling learners to navigate information and knowledge rather than providing content, and teachers should become coaches to help learners navigate available information and knowledge. This exploration of new learning paradigms anticipates the significant impact of the emerging knowledge economy on how people deal with information and learning.
Effectiveness of Flipped Learning: Improving Pre-service Teachers’ Prowess in...Dr. Almodaires
In the current study, the aim is to determine the effectiveness of flipped learning approach in developing pre-service teachers’ skills and knowledge in creating and editing digital videos. Furthermore, the approach was evaluated through the theoretical lens of constructivism and experiential learning
Effectiveness of Flipped Learning: Improving Pre-service Teachers’ Prowess in...
CE Assignment
1. ThinkingandteachingcreativelyisalwayssomethingthatIpersonallyfelt wasengrainedwithinmy
practice.AlthoughasBrookfieldaffirms(1995,p1), ‘One of the hardestthingsteachershave tolearn
isthat the sincerityof theirintentionsdoesnotguarantee the purityof theirpractice’. Toepitomise
this,as the module progressedandthe Creativeand EffectiveWeek began, Ifeltthatredefiningthis
approach wasnecessaryformy practice to evolve beyondthe dialogic(WardandCotter,2004,
p245. Copping,2010, p12). The assignmentwill initiallyfocusuponthe literature thatbothforms
and justifiesthe foundation of creative teaching,whyitisnecessaryforchildrenandwhyitisuseful
to the schoolsinwhichour weekisundertaken (DysonandGallannaugh 2007, p480). Afterthis,the
assignmentwillthen examinethe modificationsthatmanifestedthemselves promptedbymyown
experiencesandthe reading outlined.
Creativityineducation,contrarytothe popularopinion,referstothe wayinwhichthe teacher
deliversandmakesthe inputaccessible tochildren.AsBentleyandSeltzer(1999, p18) insist,itdoes
not refertoan artisticsensibility.However,thisdelineationbetweencreativityand the creative arts
isoccasionally distorted byhowthe childusessimilarthoughtprocessestotackle these twotasks
(LangleyandJones,1988. Torrence,1962. Ochse,1990). Thiscomplex argument istypifiedin a
summation byAtkinson(2000,p257): ‘Relevantskills,thoughnotsufficientinthemselvestoproduce
creativity,have beenshowntobe crucial for itsdevelopment’.Inshort,creative approachesto
teachingrequires the use of skillsmore applicable tothe creative artswhendeliveringanysubject.
Knownfactsand knowledge are requiredtohave beenlearnttoensure creativityistrulysuccessful.
Thistenetwascentral to the change inapproach duringmyown Creative andEffective Week.
Creativityinteachinghasbecome more crucial toensuringthe relevance of education because
global employmenthasshiftedtowardsintellectual propertyratherthanthe manufacturing
industries. The keyskillsthatare nowrequiredbyemployersare toembrace andunderstand
2. diversity,adapttosocietyandtechnologyandconnect culture tothe widercommunity (NACCCE,
1999). To prepare our childrenforthisenvironment,‘Learningisbestconceivedasaprocess,notin
termsof outcomes’(Kolb,1984,p26. Morgan et al, 2007, p22. Ward and Cotter,2004, p244.
NACCCE,1999, p31. Claxton,2009, p35. Dysonand Gallannaugh, 2007, pp473-5). The current
curriculumreliesoninformationbeingdeposited.Modernindustry,onthe otherhand, requiresthat
potential employees,whoare currently children,shouldbe more critical and discerningof their
knowledge orto‘focusonlearninghowtolearn’ (Morgan et al, 2007, pp14-23. Claxton,2009, pp8-
9). In the currentcurriculum,childrenare,Bruner(1996 p55) argues, ‘presentedwithfacts,
principles,andrulesof actionwhichare tobe learned,remembered,andthenapplied’.By
encouraginglearningthroughtalkingandresearchtasksthe facilitatorencouragesthe learnerto
categorise andorganise the informationthatisto be used. Learningskillssuchascreative thinking
requirescreative teaching,creativeintegration,takingrisksandbreakingroutine(NACCCE,1999).
What isalso relevanttothe immediatelearningenvironment of the classroomisthatgreat learning
occurs inpupil groupsinwhichdiscussionpropagatesunderstanding (NACCCE,1999, pp90-6.
Morgan et al,2007, pp23-6. Kagan, 2014). Simultaneously,children’sself-esteemisdramatically
increasedbecause, ‘Learningisincremental andreliesonmakingmistakes’(BentleyandSeltzer,
1999, p19. NACCCE,1999. Morgan et al, 2007, p15. Claxton,2009, pp9-10). Therefore,creative
teachinginsists,’knowingisaprocess,not a product’(Bruner,1996, p72. KolbandKolb,2005, p194.
Kolb,1994, p26).
The justificationof creative teachingisnotsolelybaseduponitsuse tomodernindustry.Experiential
teachingstylesmeetmore of the childrenandtheirneeds. DysonandGallannaugh(2007,p481)
illustrate thatthese approachescanengage those pupilswhofeeldisengagedbyschool.Atthis
point,there mustbe a recognitionthatexperiential andcreative teaching are twodifferent
strategies.However,experiential learningisakeycomponentincreative teachingandthe twoare
3. closelyintertwinedintheory.Ultimately,the twoprocessesare basedon the same beliefs.The
theoristswhoextollthe concreteexperiential(Kolb,1984, p21) model insist, ‘All learningis
relearning’.Learningisbestfacilitatedbyaprocessthatdraws outthe students’beliefsandideas
abouta topic’(KolbandKolb,2005, p194. Kolb,1994, p20). Similarly,creative strategiesencourage
childrentobe ‘more self-aware abouthow theylearn’,andadopta, ‘Problem-posingapproachto
teachingandlearning’(Morganet al, 2007, p15). Both require the childrentointeractwiththe
stimulusinamore creative way sothisassignmentwilloccasionallyappraisethe twomethods
concurrently.
The way inwhichcreative learningisdelivereddoesnotadhere toa single learningstyle.The
demandthatcreativityplacesoncuriosityandexploration andthe teachertopitchthisin multiple
waysadherestothe visual,audio,reading,kinaestheticlearningstyles (Csikszentmihalyi,1997, pp6-
7. Claxton,2009, p13). AlthoughcurrentunderstandinghaslabelledVARKasnotcredible due tothe
lack of evidence tosupportthisapproach,there isnoevidence thatpitchingpresentationsinthe
excitingandstimulatingwaysthatVARKdemandshasnoeffect (ReinerandWillingham, 2009,p33).
Eventhisbelief’sdoubters,admitthat‘Studentsmayhave preferencesabouthow tolearn’(Reiner
and Willingham,2009, p34). DeridingVARKapproacheshere isguiltyof, ‘psychologists…generalizing
fromlearningina rat maze’(Bruner,1996, p45) anddoesnot necessarilyprogressbestteaching
practice. Therefore,thisassignmentwilljustifythe creative approachmaintainingthatthe VARK
model,althoughnoproven,meetschildren’sneedsinsome way.
The VARKmodel,championedby Fleming(2001),is notthe onlymodel thatbelievesthatthere isa
single wayof pitchinglessonstochildren.Manytheoristsbelievethatchildrenlearnbestfroma
curriculumthatis made accessible indifferentways. ‘The implicationsforfacultyare significant…if
theyassume thatall studentslearnthe same wayor that one teachingapproach will connectwithall
4. students’theyriskexcludingsome of the class (HawkandShah,2007, p1).The mostextreme
estimatesbelieve that 41%of learnershave asingle preference of learningstylethatmustbe
accommodatedbyany facilitator(Fleming, 2001, p1. Gregoricand Ward, 1977) so these children
theoretically canonly be reached if theirspecificneedsare cateredforwithinthe lesson.Itis
inclusivenessof all childreninlearningthatremainscentral tocreative teaching.Whetheritbe the
divergers,accommodators,convergersandassimilators of GregoricandWard (1977) or the VARK
learningstyles,the methodsof building ‘talents,skills,andabilities,ratherthanknowledge and
understanding’(Bruner,1996, p51) ensuresthat manylearningstylesare met.Forthe creative
teacherbelievestheir‘jobistocontribute toa broaderconceptof the publicgoodand to
understandthe social andpolitical contextof myworkas a teacher’ (Morganet al, 2007, pp26-8).In
summation,we teachersmustunderstandhow knowledge isproducedandprovide an interesting
stimulustoensure ourclassroomispart of ‘a learnercentredinstitution’(KolbandKolb,2005,
p210). We must ensure thatinstillingconfidence andskillsratherthanresultsisalwaysourprincipal
goal (Telegraph,2014. Atkinson,2000, pp255-6).
The planningforthe Creative andEffective Weekincorporatedmuchof the above theory.The
planningbeganseveral weeksbeforethe actual weekbycompletingthe HawesSide TopicPlanner.
Mind mappingatthisstage of lessonplanningaidsinventionandthistopicplannersortsideasacross
several different subjectareas,the initial stimuliandabig finish (Mishra,2009, p79). By formingthe
children’s‘Ican’statements withinthese sections,the learninggoalsacrossthe topicbecome
apparent. The topicwas a local historyprojectinwhichthe Year 5 classwouldlearnabouttheir
immediate locality,BlackpoolandLancashire.The National Curriculum(2013,pp144-7) requiresthat
pupilsinGeographyandHistoryshould‘extendtheirknowledge beyondtheirlocal areatoinclude
the UnitedKingdom…digital computermapping…alocal historystudy’. The historyelement,likethe
National Curriculumrequires,concentratesonthe local region.Specifically,the PendleWitchesand
5. Blackpool’sride asa nineteenthcenturytouristtown.The statementswhichformthe learninggoals
were createdusingChrisQuigley’s Planninga skills based curriculum (2008) and the Lancashire
CountyCouncil’sChildren’sTargetsforWriting. These importantlyfocussedonwhatthe children
shouldlearnanddiscoverfromthe week:I can use the terms‘PHYSICALand HUMAN’, I can name
the significantplacesandfeature of alocationIam studying;Ican use documentsand printed
sources;I can use datesand termsaccurately and I can ask “What wasit like fora… (child,rich
person,etc…) during…”The numeracylessonsstoodindependentlyfromthe Creative andEffective
Weekandwouldforma segmentof the timetable thatwouldprovidethe childrenwiththe familiar
routines.
Monitoring,questioningandchild self-esteeminmini pre-learningactivitiesperformed duringthe
visitingdayshadrevealedthatthe children didnotidentifywiththe term Lancashire(Clarke,2005,
p1). Thiscreateda needfora topic lessonduringthe second visitingweek inwhichthe children’s
immediate localitywasexplored. Itwaswithinthisexamplethatprovedcreativityandresearch
(Bruner,1996, p60) works bestcomplementedwithtaughtknowledge.ForAtkinson’s(2000,p246)
‘recallingandimaging;classifyingandgeneralising;comparingandevaluating;analysingand
synthesizing;deducingandinferring’creative process towork,the childrenrequire pre-taught
knownfactsand strategies. Csikszentmihalyi (1997,p5) insiststhatthisany creative processmust
beginwithapreparation or researchphase. Withoutthislessonformingapreliminarystage intheir
knowledge,the entireweekwouldhave beenatbestconfusingandatworst meaningless.The
lessonrequiredthatthe targetsforthose childrenwhowere struggling(3b) couldidentifyand
describe where placesare.Beginningwitha‘Simonsays’game inwhichthe childrenwouldmove
towardscompasspointsplacedaroundthe classroom, the children’sconfidence withcompass
pointswascontinuallyassessedwithAFLstrategieswiththe possibilitythatthe lessonplanswould
be adaptedaccordingly(Clark,2005, p4). Satisfiedwiththe children’sknowledge,the lesson
6. progressedtothe childrenusingIPadswithintheirgroupstofindtheirschool,its playgroundandthe
shortestroute to the beach.Zoomingout,theysaw PendletonandBlackpool’splace inLancashire
and were required toplace Blackpool onthe JohnSpeedmap(Speed,1610).The JohnSpeedMap
didnot recordthe place of Blackpool asit was not consideredasignificantsettlementuntil the late
seventeenthcentury whichwouldbe highlightedtothe childrenagainlaterinthe week (Lambert,
2015). Using a worksheet,the childrenwouldthenidentifythe countieswhichlaynexttoone
another. A homeworktaskwouldaskthe childrenforthree funfactsabout Lancashire.Asall this
workwas done intheirassignedgroups,the abilityforthese childrentoworkwithone anotherwas
assessed.Dialogue andconversationstimulateslearning (NACCCE,1999, pp90-6. Morgan et al, 2007,
pp23-6. Kagan, 2014) and the stimulusof a seriesof prizesmeantthatthere wasanextrinsicreward
to encourage full groupparticipationthroughoutthe week.Amabile (1985) believesthatcreativity
flourishesbestinthe absence of rewards.However,the rewards createdgreatexpectationand
actedto reinforce positivebehaviour (Kyriacou, 1991,p82). For thisreason,several moveswere
coordinated betweenthe groups.The groups,the class’sacceptance of ustwoas teachers, our
expectations, the topicandthe planned triphadall beenimplantedcruciallyatthisearlystage.
The stimulustriptothe TowerDungeonsisthe firstsubjectinthe Creative andEffective Weekthat
isto be discussed.The Dungeonswere selectedseveral weeksbefore becauseitgave alimitedof the
Pendle Witches,witchtrials,avisittoa Blackpool touristattractionandmostimportantlygenerated
discussion betweenthe children (Piaget,2002, pp37-40. Corbettand Strong,2011, p28). It occurred
on the Monday andafter a numeracylessonandwasdesignedtogive areference pointandenable
the elicitingknowledge stage of the EnquiryCycle throughoutthe week (Morganetal, 2007, p32).
The Enquiring Minds EnquiryCycle wasthe preferredtemplate forlearningduringthe entireweekas
alternative,forexampleAtkinson’s(2000, p258), was consideredtoo convoluted forplanning
purposes.
7. The attached lessonplanwasboth the firstlessonafterthe initial stimulusandredefinedthe focus
of learningonthe week. Enthusedbythe opportunityof beingtrulycreative,IfollowedGuyClaxton
(2009, p35) andKolb’s(1984, p28) contentionthatgoodteachingsometimescreatesdocile,
dependentanduncritical pupils.Myhabitto heavilymodelandscaffold wastherefore tobe
minimised. Onthe otherhand,Ishouldhave certainlytakenintoconsiderationthatchildren’shigh
orderand enquiryskillsmustbe firstlydeveloped(Atkinson,2000, p277. NACCCE,1999). Also,
interestingly,knownfactsmustbe learnt (Morganet al, 2007, p40). Asthe stimulushadalready
beenexperiencedwith the triptothe TowerDungeons, the lessonbeganwiththe childrentoposing
questionsthatMorgan et al (2007, p40) definedas, ‘whatcan youfindoutquickly,whatisleft
unanswered,whatdirectiondoyouwantto go,what aspectsare most interesting,whatare the key
areas to focuson,are there differentperspectivesandwhomightbe able tohelpyou?’.Anabridged
videofollowedinwhichthe childrenlearntaboutwhathappenedtothe PendleWitches andsothe
childrencouldempathise withtheircharges.
Sharinglearningintentionswiththe childrenwasthenperformedtoincrease theirengagement and
self-esteem(Clarke,2005,p7). The successcriteriaconsistedof atotal of sevendifferenttypesof
workin whichthe childrencouldgive astrongaccount of the trial froma storyboardto a newspaper
article.Althoughthe workwasenthusiasticallycompleted,the qualitywasnotupto the class’s
normal standard. It wasupon reflectionafterthislessonthatIdecidedtoinclude some more
scaffoldingtechniques forthe benefitof the children inthe remaininglessons. Experiential learning
approaches, like manyinclusionpractices,donotnecessarilystretchthe highachievers(Farrell,
2004, pp11-2. Booth,1999. Karten,2010, p63. Gilborn& Mirza, 2000. Mittler,2005, pp114-5). For
bestpractice is measuredbythe qualityof instruction andthe effectivenessof questioning rather
than simplybeingable tosimplymaintainhighexpectations (BBCNews,2014).
8. To furtherillustrate thispoint,abrief investigationof the week’snumeracylessonsisdetailed. It
followedthe Lancashire numeracyplanwhichdetailedorderingandsimplifyingfractions.The week
beganwithtwotraditional lessonsinwhichthe childrenwere taughtknownfactsof comprehending
whatthe numeratoranddenominatormeans,identifyingequivalentsandexpressingtoitssimpliest
form.Afterthis,twomore creative lessonsdevelopingandassessingthe children’sskillscouldbe
commenced.Arguably,these lessonswere onlypossible because teachinginputandassessmenthad
firstlyconcentratedonthe knownfactshadoccurred (Morganet al, 2007, p40). The more research
basedlessonswere asimplifyingandorderingof fractionsandacarousel activity thatwoulduse
priorknowledge.The contentionthatthe laterlessonswere onlypossible afterthe earlierknown
fact lessonwere deliveredisnota definitive judgement.However,thispractitionerhasnot
discoveredasuitable alternative tothisprocessbutunderstandsthatImust.
In conclusion,creativityisanexceptional tool thateveryteachermustattempttoutilise.Itcan
provide agreat stimulusandencouragesabetterqualityof workasthe childrenwill be inspiredand
wanttheirenthusiasmtobe reflectedin the task.However,the researchcreative tasksmustbe
complemented,orevenprefaced,withawell scaffoldedsetof knownfactssothat the childrenmay
explore newstrategiesbythemselves.
Passionatelydeliveringalessonisextremelyimportant.Whetherthe differinglearningstylesof
childrenare believedornot,itisimportantthat bybeingdiverse inthe pitchingof yourtaskswhich
creative approaches,experiential learningstylesandenquiringresearchdemandsthenitensuresat
leasta foundationof inclusion.Thisinclusion requiressome extradifferentiationbysupportortask
inorder to correctlyprogressall membersof the class,however,creative teachingisa fantastic
startingpoint.
9. Reference list
Amabile,T.M. (1985), ‘MotivationandCreativity:Effectsof Motivational OrientationonCreative
Writers’, Journalof Personalityand SocialPsychology,48,393–399
Atkinson,S.(2000) ‘Doesthe NeedforHighLevelsof Performance Curtail the Developmentof
Creativity inDesignandTechnology ProjectWork?’, InternationalJournalof Technology &Design
Education.10, 3, 255-281.
BBC News(2014) Lavish praisefromteachers‘doesnothelp pupils’.Availableat:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-29838029 (Accessed:31/10/2014)
Bentley,T.andSeltzer,K.(1999) The creative age:Knowledgeand skills forthe new economy.
London.Demos.
Brookfield,S.(1995) Becoming a critically reflective teacher.San Francisco.Jossey-Bass.
Bruner,J (1996) The culture of education.London.HarvardUniversityPress.
Claxton,G.(2009) What’sthe Pointof School?Rediscovering theheart of education. London.One
World.
Copping,A.(2010) ‘WatchingMe, WatchingYou, Aha!Developingreflectionandpractice
throughthe use of video’, Tean Journal.1,2.Availableat:
http://bit.ly/tyfJ5M(Accessed28 October2011).
Corbett,P.and Strong,J. (2011) Talk forwriting acrossthecurriculum. New York.OpenUniversity
Press.
Csikszentmihalyi,M.(1997) Creativityflow andthe psychologyof discoveryand invention.London.
Harper.
Dyson,A.and Gallannaugh,F.(2007), Nationalpolicy and thedevelopmentof inclusive school
practices: a case study,pp473-88.
10. Fleming, N.D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles:VARK strategies.New Zealand, Christchurch
Gillborn,D.and Mirza, H. S. (2000) EducationalInequality:Mapping race,classand gender.A
synthesisof research evidencefor the OfficeforStandardsin Education.London.Ofsted.Ascitedin,
Dyson,A.and Gallannaugh,F.(2007), Nationalpolicy and thedevelopmentof inclusive school
practices: a case study,pp473-88. P474.
Gregoric, A.F., and Ward, H. B. (1977). ‘A new definition forindividual:implications forlearningand
teaching’.NASSP Bulletin, 401, 6, 20–23.
Hawk.T. F.and Shah,A. J.(2007) Using learningstyle instrumentstoenhance studentlearning.
Decisive Sciences Journalof InnovativeEducation (5,1) 1-19.
Kagan,S (2014) Kagan structuressimply put.Availableat:
http://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/ASK38.php (Lastaccessed,2014)
Karten,T. J. (2010) Inclusion strategiesthatwork:Research-based methodsfortheclassroom(2nd
edition) London:Sage.
Kolb,D.A. (1984) Experientiallearning: experienceas thesource of learning and development.New
Jersey.Prentice Hall.
Kolb,D.A. and Kolb,A.(2005) Learningstylesandlearningspaces:EnhancingExperiential learningin
HigherEducation, Academy of ManagementLearning &Education.4,2, 193–212.
Lambert,T. (2015) A history of Blackpool. Availableat:http://www.localhistories.org/blackpool.html.
(Last accessed12/04/15)
Kyriacou,C.(1991) Essential Teaching Skills. London.Basil Blackwell.
Lancashire CountyCouncil, Children’sTargetsforWriting. Lancaster.Lancashire CountyCouncil.
11. Langley,P.andJones,R. (1988) ‘A computational model of scientificinsight’,inR.J.Sternberg(ed.)
The natureof creativity: Contemporary psychologicalperspectives,Cambridge.Cambridge University
Press.
Mishra,R. C. (2009) Lesson planning. New Delhi.A.P.H.Publishing.
Mittler,P.(2005) Working towardsinclusiveeducation:Socialcontexts.London.DavidFulton
Publishers.
Morgan, J, Williamson,B,Lee,T.and FisherK.(2007) Enquiring Minds.London.Futurelab.
National AdvisoryCommittee onCreativeandCultural Education(1999) All ourfutures:Creativity,
culture and education. London,NACCCE.
National Curriculum(2013) The NationalCurriculumin England:Handbookforprimary teachers.Key
stages1 & 2. Oxford.Scholastic.
Osche,R. (1990) Beforethe gatesof excellence: The determinantsof creativegenius,Cambridge.
Cambridge UniversityPress.
Piaget,J.(2002) The Languageand thoughtof thechild. London.Routledge.
Quigley,C.(2008) Planning a skills based curriculum (2008). London.ChrisQuigleyEducationLtd.
Reiner,Cand Willingham,D(2009) ’The Myths of learningstyles’.Available at:
http://sites.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/10091/2012/03/Reiner-and-Willingham_2010.pdf
(Last accessed:3/4/14).
Speed,J.(1610) John Speed’smap of Lancashire.Available at:
http://www3.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/oldmap/speed/speed.jpg (Lastaccessed28/3/15)
13. To understand the
Pendle w itch story. Do
w e believe their guilt?
Reconstruct and
engage w ith the
evidence fromthe trial
and establish w hether
the w itcheswere
innocent or guilty.
To create empathy w ith
the characters.
History Level 4
Use a variety of sources to
find out about
events, people and changes
Ask and answer questions.
Select and record relevant
information
Level 5
use documents, printed
sources (e.g. archive
materials) the Internet,
databases, pictures,
photographs,
music, artefacts, historic
buildings, visits to museums
and galleries and visits to
sites to collect evidence
about the past.
I ask, “What was it like for a...
(child, rich person, etc)
during…
I suggest sources of
evidence to help me answer
questions.
Remind the children about w hat we discussed. ‘What did w e decide about the w itches being
w itches?’A, Cait, D and JH w ere engaged by this. Will they continue this?
Use a more confident pupil as an example (H, Ch- good to encourage their engagement), if I
didn’t like the w ay they act, talkin class w hat would Ido in 1612? Discuss my options. I’d just
accuse themof being a w itch.
Look at the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HaBPQti_Mk
From start until 2 mins. ‘So w hat have we learnt?’‘What does this tell us about w hat the w orld
w as like for people in 1612?’, ‘w ho wasthe main child in the Witch Trials?’- Answers to be
given by JH, LB, A and D.
Continue until 3.28. The w ords ‘Malkin Tow er’
Where did the Pendle w itcheslive? In w hat county? Near w hat hill?
Remind the children that this is the information that can go in the Local History books. Remind
that merits are received for the best books.
From 4.10. Up to 6.52- Pictures of hills
‘Cunning w oman’discussion- Who is a cunning w oman? Is this a w itch? Go backto Alisha and
AH’s point: Were these w omen just un-liked?
Do w e know more names of the w itches?
What got Chattox accused of a w itch?
Revision: So w ho were the witchesand what did they do: (Remind them of the w itch hunter
video)
Questioning to discover who a ‘peddler’is.
From 7.53- 12.45.
What did the w itchesthen do? A peddler had a stroke, the w itches were blamed
Determine the questions that w e w ish to find out fromthe research.
Task: Children to agree the tasks that they w ish to do in their mixed ability groups. Story board
templates, information on the w itchesand lined and coloured paper supplied.
Usefulw ebsites:
http://www.pendlewitches.co.uk/
http://www.historic-uk.com/CultureUK/The-Pendle-Witches/ (HA readers only)
http://www.pendlewitches.net/page8.html
Resources:
storyboards sheets,
crayons, and
children’s
sketchbooks,
youtube, groups of 4
decided.
(print off pages 1& 4
of witches beliefs
and superstitions for
each group)
14. (print off and laminate pages 1 & 4 of w itches beliefsand superstitions foreach group)
http://myths.e2bn.org/mythsandlegends/teachers20-a-witch-in-a-bottle.html
Extension activity questions on pages 1 and 3:
http://myths.e2bn.org/mythsandlegends/teachers20-a-witch-in-a-bottle.html
Plenary:
Class discussion (groups with DeBonos hats?):
For the consolidation of their know ledge: Billy Connolly video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuHTbni99h8 (up to 2.18)
Questions: ‘We knew most of that, didn’t w e?’
These are general annotations made at the time of the progress of children/groupsand possible changes to future lessons.
Adams, T. (2007) ‘Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence of the Teaching and Learning’. Manhattan, KS: National Academic Advising
Association.
Assessment Topic overall
The agreed successcriteria/things to do w ere
constructed in an unfettered manner. The
children w ere probably overwhelmed with what
they could do rather than focussing on fewer
tasks (that I should have guided the class
tow ards). The list of activities that the groups
should produce w as: 1) Storyboard,2) Written
account 3) Recount of events 4) Diary entry 5)
Fun facts about the w itches.
(Although great activity ideas, because I
effectivelygave the class free reign, there w as
no planned modelling or assessment of their
understanding of w hat the children’s
suggestions actually meant- it w as clear that
w hen the guided w orkbegan that the children
w ere confused by the choice of tasks)
Independent
Roger Now ellgroup did extremely good w ork
although they w ere supported heavily by the
TA staff.
Chattox and Anne Redferne w orked extremely
w elltogether. The w orkthat they produced
show ed good understanding but lacked the
research that w asconductedby Roger Now ell.
Anne Redferne, I used as an example in a
mini-plenary during the early stages of child
activity. The recorder had assigned tasks
perfectly.
With help
Thomas Potts, James Device and Alice Device
w ere reliant on the stronger members of the
group.
Couldn’t do it
Demdike group. The progress wasdecidedly mixed across the
group. H and E did much of their group’s w orkwhich was
excellent. Even I had to intervene to keep T and J on task.
15. Clarke, S. (2005) Unlocking Formative Assessment. Book Point. London.
Claxton, G. (2009) What’s the Point of School? Rediscovering the heart of education. London. One World
DeBono, E. (2011) Six value medals. London. Random House.
DeBono, E. (1994) Teach your child how to think. London. Penguin Books.
Gadsby, C. (2012) Perfect assessment for learning. London Crown House Publishing.
Kagan, S (2014) Kagan structures simply put. Available at: http://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/ASK38.php (Last
accessed, 2014)
Kerry, T. (2002) Learning objectives, task setting and differentiation. London. Nelson Thornes.
Morgan, J, Williamson, B, Lee, T. and Fisher K. (2007) Enquiring Minds. London. Futurelab.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (1999) All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London, NACCCE.
Rape, R. M (2008), Helping Your Anxious Child 2nd
edition. Oakland. New Harbinger.