Fraud instances are seen in a wide range of domains such as finance, telecommunications and health care. In addition to the monetary loss, fraud results in loss of confidence to the governmental systems and diminishes the overall system quality. For instance, in health care, while overpayments are estimated to correspond up to ten percent of expenditures, they also have direct adverse impacts on patient health. Statistical methods have become crucial to handle overpayments especially given the increasing size and complexity. This talk aims to provide an overview of the challenges and opportunities of using analytical methods for fraud assessment, with an emphasis on health care systems. First, various fraud data types will be illustrated with some real world examples. Next, sampling, overpayment estimation and data mining methods will be discussed. In particular, the use of data mining methods have gained momentum to reveal hidden relationships and fraud patterns as well as for classification and prediction. The talk will conclude with a discussion of the proposed extensions in relevant domains such as handling improper payments and potential future work to address the practical needs such as integrated decision making.
March 2, 2018
Value-based health care is one of the most pressing topics in health care finance and policy today. Value-based payment structures are widely touted as critical to controlling runaway health care costs, but are often difficult for health care entities to incorporate into their existing infrastructures. Because value-based health care initiatives have bipartisan support, it is likely that these programs will continue to play a major role in both the public and private health insurance systems. As such, there is a pressing need to evaluate the implementation of these initiatives thus far and to discuss the direction that American health care financing will take in the coming years.
To explore this important issue, the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School collaborated with Ropes & Gray LLP to host a one-day conference on value-based health care. This event brought together scholars, health law practitioners, and health care entities to evaluate the impact of value-based health care on the American health care system.
For more information, visit our website at: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/will-value-based-care-save-the-health-care-system
March 02, 2018
Value-based health care is one of the most pressing topics in health care finance and policy today. Value-based payment structures are widely touted as critical to controlling runaway health care costs, but are often difficult for health care entities to incorporate into their existing infrastructures. Because value-based health care initiatives have bipartisan support, it is likely that these programs will continue to play a major role in both the public and private health insurance systems. As such, there is a pressing need to evaluate the implementation of these initiatives thus far and to discuss the direction that American health care financing will take in the coming years.
To explore this important issue, the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School collaborated with Ropes & Gray LLP to host a one-day conference on value-based health care. This event brought together scholars, health law practitioners, and health care entities to evaluate the impact of value-based health care on the American health care system.
For more information, visit our website at: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/will-value-based-care-save-the-health-care-system
Fraud instances are seen in a wide range of domains such as finance, telecommunications and health care. In addition to the monetary loss, fraud results in loss of confidence to the governmental systems and diminishes the overall system quality. For instance, in health care, while overpayments are estimated to correspond up to ten percent of expenditures, they also have direct adverse impacts on patient health. Statistical methods have become crucial to handle overpayments especially given the increasing size and complexity. This talk aims to provide an overview of the challenges and opportunities of using analytical methods for fraud assessment, with an emphasis on health care systems. First, various fraud data types will be illustrated with some real world examples. Next, sampling, overpayment estimation and data mining methods will be discussed. In particular, the use of data mining methods have gained momentum to reveal hidden relationships and fraud patterns as well as for classification and prediction. The talk will conclude with a discussion of the proposed extensions in relevant domains such as handling improper payments and potential future work to address the practical needs such as integrated decision making.
March 2, 2018
Value-based health care is one of the most pressing topics in health care finance and policy today. Value-based payment structures are widely touted as critical to controlling runaway health care costs, but are often difficult for health care entities to incorporate into their existing infrastructures. Because value-based health care initiatives have bipartisan support, it is likely that these programs will continue to play a major role in both the public and private health insurance systems. As such, there is a pressing need to evaluate the implementation of these initiatives thus far and to discuss the direction that American health care financing will take in the coming years.
To explore this important issue, the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School collaborated with Ropes & Gray LLP to host a one-day conference on value-based health care. This event brought together scholars, health law practitioners, and health care entities to evaluate the impact of value-based health care on the American health care system.
For more information, visit our website at: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/will-value-based-care-save-the-health-care-system
March 02, 2018
Value-based health care is one of the most pressing topics in health care finance and policy today. Value-based payment structures are widely touted as critical to controlling runaway health care costs, but are often difficult for health care entities to incorporate into their existing infrastructures. Because value-based health care initiatives have bipartisan support, it is likely that these programs will continue to play a major role in both the public and private health insurance systems. As such, there is a pressing need to evaluate the implementation of these initiatives thus far and to discuss the direction that American health care financing will take in the coming years.
To explore this important issue, the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School collaborated with Ropes & Gray LLP to host a one-day conference on value-based health care. This event brought together scholars, health law practitioners, and health care entities to evaluate the impact of value-based health care on the American health care system.
For more information, visit our website at: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/will-value-based-care-save-the-health-care-system
At the Heart of the Matter: Medical NecessityPYA, P.C.
PYA Principal Denise Hall and Michael Spake, Vice President of External Affairs and Chief Compliance & Integrity Officer at Lakeland Regional Health System, co-presented “At the Heart of the Matter: Medical Necessity,” at the AHLA Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues. They discussed:
Recent cases and legal actions
Impact of medical necessity when interpreting the regulations and guidelines for:
-Stents
-Pacemakers
-Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (AICD)
-Electrophysiology Studies (EPS) and Ablations
Common areas of risk in applying local coverage determination (LCD)/national coverage determination (NCD) guidance to cardiac procedures: how to identify your risks and avoid vulnerability
Best practices for ensuring compliance with regulations
How a 5 Hospital System Reduced Infection Rates, Saved Over $2 million and In...Innovations2Solutions
In a collaborative effort, Cone Health and Sodexo Health Care embarked on an initiative to reduce hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and increase patient satisfaction. As a result, the system achieved a 64% decrease in MRSA infections from 2010 to 2012 and a 56% decrease in all device- related HAIs during the period. In addition, the system’s HCAHPS scores improved 14%, while more recent Press Ganey scores have gained 63 percentile points.
Abu Dhabi Health Authority legislates the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) system as a payment method for inpatient hospital services in both public and private sectors. The purpose of this research policy paper is to provide an insight into the DRG system in Abu Dhabi Healthcare system in developing an understanding of the process involved concerning DRG including the legislative arm, the healthcare providers and the payers. Besides, this brief evaluates the DRG system from the end user, which is then, compared public and private healthcare sector where policy recommendations and associated implications are highlighted.
Linking clinical workforce skill mix planning to health and health care dynamicsIme Asangansi, MD, PhD
Current health workforce planning methods are inadequate for the complexity of the task. Most approaches treat the workforce supply of individual health professions in isolation and avoid quantifying the impact of changes in skills mix, either planned or unplanned. The causes and consequences of task delegation and task substitution between or within health professions is particularly important in handling workforce shortages in developing countries and understanding and planning possible responses to both rapid catastrophic health demands and slower background trends in their social and political environment. As well as the contextual environment, interactions and delays in supplying and balancing health resources and configuring clinical services are required to address the geographic, profession-specific and quality imbalances. These supply side resources include knowledge and research, skills and attitudes of clinicians, buildings and equipment, medications and medical technologies, information and communications technologies and any other methods and models to improve the provision of clinical services. The interaction between demand
and supply could adjust for feedbacks of health services outcomes, policies and governance on population expectations, funding, political and social supports and explicitly link these to clinical workforce supply in a useful, rigorous and relevant tool. The challenge is capture the relevant essence of the dynamic complexity of health and healthcare for this purpose.
This presentation from the 2014 ASHRM Conference analyzes the legal, regulatory and clinical risks related to meaningful consent and offers ways to mitigate them.
the paradigm is changing; the dominant focus for the next decade at least will be value, or to be precise triple value
The Aim is triple value & greater equity
• Allocative value, determined by how the assets are distributed to different sub groups in the population
• Technical value, determined by how well resources are used for all the people in need in the population
• Personalised value, determined by how well the decisions relate to the values of each individual
If you want to see more please look at http://bettervaluehealthcare.weebly.com
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Care - Zeena NackerdienZeena Nackerdien
PROs should be integral to evidence-based cancer care. Here I summarize the latest expert opinions on the subject in the form of a conversation between two oncologists. This information should be helpful to healthcare practitioners and patients alike. As always, please consult your own medical doctors for case-by-case advice.
At the Heart of the Matter: Medical NecessityPYA, P.C.
PYA Principal Denise Hall and Michael Spake, Vice President of External Affairs and Chief Compliance & Integrity Officer at Lakeland Regional Health System, co-presented “At the Heart of the Matter: Medical Necessity,” at the AHLA Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues. They discussed:
Recent cases and legal actions
Impact of medical necessity when interpreting the regulations and guidelines for:
-Stents
-Pacemakers
-Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (AICD)
-Electrophysiology Studies (EPS) and Ablations
Common areas of risk in applying local coverage determination (LCD)/national coverage determination (NCD) guidance to cardiac procedures: how to identify your risks and avoid vulnerability
Best practices for ensuring compliance with regulations
How a 5 Hospital System Reduced Infection Rates, Saved Over $2 million and In...Innovations2Solutions
In a collaborative effort, Cone Health and Sodexo Health Care embarked on an initiative to reduce hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and increase patient satisfaction. As a result, the system achieved a 64% decrease in MRSA infections from 2010 to 2012 and a 56% decrease in all device- related HAIs during the period. In addition, the system’s HCAHPS scores improved 14%, while more recent Press Ganey scores have gained 63 percentile points.
Abu Dhabi Health Authority legislates the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) system as a payment method for inpatient hospital services in both public and private sectors. The purpose of this research policy paper is to provide an insight into the DRG system in Abu Dhabi Healthcare system in developing an understanding of the process involved concerning DRG including the legislative arm, the healthcare providers and the payers. Besides, this brief evaluates the DRG system from the end user, which is then, compared public and private healthcare sector where policy recommendations and associated implications are highlighted.
Linking clinical workforce skill mix planning to health and health care dynamicsIme Asangansi, MD, PhD
Current health workforce planning methods are inadequate for the complexity of the task. Most approaches treat the workforce supply of individual health professions in isolation and avoid quantifying the impact of changes in skills mix, either planned or unplanned. The causes and consequences of task delegation and task substitution between or within health professions is particularly important in handling workforce shortages in developing countries and understanding and planning possible responses to both rapid catastrophic health demands and slower background trends in their social and political environment. As well as the contextual environment, interactions and delays in supplying and balancing health resources and configuring clinical services are required to address the geographic, profession-specific and quality imbalances. These supply side resources include knowledge and research, skills and attitudes of clinicians, buildings and equipment, medications and medical technologies, information and communications technologies and any other methods and models to improve the provision of clinical services. The interaction between demand
and supply could adjust for feedbacks of health services outcomes, policies and governance on population expectations, funding, political and social supports and explicitly link these to clinical workforce supply in a useful, rigorous and relevant tool. The challenge is capture the relevant essence of the dynamic complexity of health and healthcare for this purpose.
This presentation from the 2014 ASHRM Conference analyzes the legal, regulatory and clinical risks related to meaningful consent and offers ways to mitigate them.
the paradigm is changing; the dominant focus for the next decade at least will be value, or to be precise triple value
The Aim is triple value & greater equity
• Allocative value, determined by how the assets are distributed to different sub groups in the population
• Technical value, determined by how well resources are used for all the people in need in the population
• Personalised value, determined by how well the decisions relate to the values of each individual
If you want to see more please look at http://bettervaluehealthcare.weebly.com
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Care - Zeena NackerdienZeena Nackerdien
PROs should be integral to evidence-based cancer care. Here I summarize the latest expert opinions on the subject in the form of a conversation between two oncologists. This information should be helpful to healthcare practitioners and patients alike. As always, please consult your own medical doctors for case-by-case advice.
Building Patient-Centeredness in the Real World: The Engaged Patient and the ...EngagingPatients
This paper examines the separate but intertwined ethical, economic and clinical concepts of patientcenteredness and how ACOs provide a structure for turning those concepts into a functioning reality.
Navigate 2 Scenario for Health PolicyEpisode 1Policy An.docxmayank272369
Navigate 2 Scenario for Health Policy
Episode 1:
Policy Analysis and Development
Overview
In this episode, you will be in a health care policy internship program in a Senator’s office in Washington, D.C. The Senator wants to develop policy that requires all health care organizations that receive federal funds to implement the recommendations presented in the Institute of Medicine reports on quality care. You will develop a policy, so that it can become proposed legislation. You must collect data, describe the problem, solutions and related ethical issues, examine the cost-benefit analysis, identify stakeholders (such as lobbyists from American Hospital Association, health care providers, health care corporations, pharmaceuticals, insurers, etc.), and impact. Based on this information, you will create a policy description that will be the foundation for a bill. You will describe critical issues that would be in the bill such as requirements of hospitals to:
Monitor and report medical errors to the Department of Health and Human Services
Use root cause analysis on a certain percentage of errors
Track and report patient outcomes focused on the clinical problems identified in the
National Health Care
Quality Report
Integrate the 5 health care profession core competencies into staff education and track outcomes
Establish a no-blame culture
*I suggest for you to do some research on your own, and if you use outside sources to help your compile your policy description, be sure to reference them (following an APA format) at the end of your post.
Assignment
You will post a policy description to this discussion board forum. Make sure to identify a plan that addresses legal and ethical issues in a health care policy. You must also respond to 2 of your peers' posts and make sure to reference any outside sources you may have used in your recommendation.
Below are the characters from this LearnScapes scenario (LearnScapes for
Health Policy
1):
The Student (which is you), Health Care Policy Intern for Congress
The student used to work within the Bright Road Health Care System, and had a special interest in policy. The student is thinking about moving into politics, hoping to make a difference at that level. The student has just been accepted into the internship; this is the student’s first big project.
Peter Shackley, Senior Policy Staff Member
The student’s mentor, Peter, is a young and feisty staff member. In his late 20s, Pete has been interested in politics since he was President of his high school student body. He’s especially passionate about policy-making and how the process works. Pete will help guide the student through the policy-making process.
Gretchen Wilde, Senator Chief of Staff
Gretchen is in her 30s and has been the Senator’s Chief of Staff for about 2 years now. She’s very professional, and holds high expectations for everyone in the Senator’s office, including interns. Gretchen is responsible for reviewing polic.
Florida State UniversityCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences.docxAKHIL969626
Florida State University
College of Nursing and Health Sciences
(CNHS)
HSA 526 - “Health Care Economics”
Individual Assignments/Projects
Assigned Readings
(20% of the final grade)
Instructions and Grading Scales
Instructor: Michael Durr, CPA, MHSA, CHFP
Individual projects and presentations are designed to develop competencies in students while exploring and exposing the challenges and importance of what health care professionals need to do to be successful.
Individual projects should reflect your own work, having done research, applied material from the course, and demonstrate critical thinking. Based on the subject matter of the assigned reading, your paper will reflect one or more of the following:
1. Identify and describe the components of the healthcare system in US;
2. Distinguish between the demand for health, healthcare, and health insurance;
3. Use basic cost - benefit analysis;
4. Identify and describe the role of the key players in the supply of healthcare;
5. Describe the role of government in our current health care system;
6. Identify the major economics related research questions and challenges being asked in the areas of health insurance provision, the pharmaceutical industry, the physician services industry and the long term care industry;
7. Compare and contrast the healthcare delivery system of various countries;
8. Use economic analysis to understand and criticize the changes in the healthcare system.
All documents should be prepared using the APA format. Submission subsequent to the due date will result in a reduction of 10 full points for each day or partial day late.
Instructions:
1. Based on the Assigned Reading for the week, you will prepare a two to three page critique of the paper.
2. All papers will include the standard Barry cover letter and follow APA format.
3. Your critique needs to include research based on at least two other acceptable sources (i.e. Wikipedia is not acceptable).
4. Be concise in your writing – do NOT use “fluff” (such as excessive retelling of original material from the reading or a large restatement of the situation).
5. Your grade will depend largely on the application of economic concepts and your critical thinking skills.
6. Your paper needs to have a conclusion one way or another. Do not vacillate or hedge. Your opinion counts and so make it heard!
M. Durr 1
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
IS HOSPITAL COMPETITION
SOCIALLY WASTEFUL?
Daniel P. Kessler
Mark B. McClellan
Working Paper 7266
http://www.nber.org/papers/w7266
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
July 1999
We would like to thank David Becker, Kristin Madison, and Abigail Tay for exceptional research assistance.
Participants in the University of Chicago, Econometric Society, National Bureau of Economic Research,
Northwestern University, U.S. Department of Justice/Federal Trade Commission, and Harvard/MIT industrial
organization seminars provided numerous helpful ...
This is assignment 1 that assignment 2 have to relate to. PLEASE..docxabhi353063
This is assignment 1 that assignment 2 have to relate to. PLEASE.
Financial Statement Analysis
Student name
University
Professor
October 25, 2016
Financial Statement Analysis
Based on your review of the financial statements, suggest a key insight about the financial health of the company. Speculate on the likely reaction to the financial statements from various stakeholder groups (employee, investors, shareholders). Provide support for your rationale.
Health Management Associates, Inc. (NYSE: HMA) is the operator and owner-general acute care centers in the non-urban communities situated in the US, particularly in the Southwest. The organization was founded in 1977. The hospitals provide services such as oncology, emergency room care, general surgery, internal medicine, radiology, pediatric services, coronary care, and diagnostic care (
www.healthcaremanagement.com
).The company is also providing outpatient services like x-ray, respiratory therapy, one-day surgery, laboratory services, physical therapy as well as cardiology therapy. The mission of the Health Management is to provide America’s best local healthcare. They provide processes, capital finance, expertise, and people that can ensure that the local hospitals can accomplish their mission of delivering compassionate and high-quality healthcare that would substantially improve the lives of patients, the communities they serve, and the physicians providing the care
www.healthcaremanagement.com
)
With regard to the review of the current financial statement, HMA is in a dangerous financial state as a result of the present increasing debts and legal woes. The Office of the Inspector General, Justice Department, and the Department of Health and Human Services served the organization with summons regarding a software program that was used by ED doctors and the records from the emergency department. Some reports suggested that there was pressure from the company’s hospitals management to admit patients from emergency rooms so as to maximize profits. Paul Meyer, former compliance director, claimed that HMA’s fraudulent activities could attract government investigation (Britt, 2012).
The common stock of Health Management Associates was owned by almost 850 shareholders, as per the records of December 31, 2012, with hundreds of institutional investors included. HMA had expanded to include 70 hospitals situated in 15 states, with roughly 10,562 present licensed beds. In 2012, HMA realized about $5.9 billion in net revenue (Britt, 2012).
HMA gets payments for the services it renders from the federal government through the Medicare program, the states in which it functions under each Medicaid program, and commercial insurance, among others; and patients, encompassing deductibles and co-payments. Basically, deductibles and co-payments are part of the bill of patients for the medical services provided, which many government and private payers expect the patient to cater for. ...
Point Value Descriptive TitlePurpose and Analytical .docxLeilaniPoolsy
Point Value Descriptive Title
Purpose and
Analytical
Technique(s)
Summary of Results
Summary of
Conclusions
Error Analysis
Professional
Presentation
2
Title is complete and
informative, and written
in a scientific tone
A general purpose and
all relevant analytical
techniques are given
using the correct
scientific terminology
All major numerical
results are given with
correct units and
significant figures - All
important descriptive
results are given with
appropriate context
Conclusions are made
based on the results, any
accepted values are
given for comparison,
and percent error values
are provided
Errors are given,
followed through the
calculations, and the
effect on the result is
explained - Errors are
used to explain
deviations from the
expected results
Abstract is typed, proof
read, and printed on an
appropriate medium
1
Title is informative and
appropriate, yet is
somewhat incomplete,
contains errors, or is
written in an unscientific
tone
Purpose or techniques
are partially incomplete
or use layman's terms
Result section is mostly
complete, but some
relevant results are
omitted, or incorrect
units or significant
figures are used
Conclusion section is
mostly complete, but
some relevant
conclusions are omitted
Errors are given, but not
followed through the
calculations, or not used
to explain results
Abstract contains several
errors, or has
handwritten edits
0
Title is absent, or neither
informative nor
appropriate
Section is absent or not
relevant to the
experiment
Section is absent, less
than half complete, or
not relevant to the
experiment
Section is absent, less
than half complete, or
not relevant to the
experiment
Section is absent or not
relevant to the
experiment
Abstract is handwritten,
contains numerous
errors, or otherwise
unacceptably presented
Rubric for a Scientific Abstract
In general, abstracts will be graded on the six criteria below (column headings), worth two points each.
The resulting points out of 12 will be converted to a gradebook score out of five.
Score = (
5
/12 ) × Points
Some rules for it:
1. Font size 12, times new roman style.
2. 600 words
About Abstracts:
An abstract is a brief, written summary of the specific idea or concepts to be presented, and a statement of their relevance to practice or research.
This is one type to write abstracts:
Research abstracts: include a brief description of the author’s original objective or hypothesis research methodology, including design, participant characteristics and procedures, major findings, and conclusions or implications for dietetics.
All words should write by yourself, no quote from any website or paper.
Please check abstract grading rubric for get higher grade. Thanks.
PRACTICE APPLICATIONS
Business of Dietetics
Hospital-Acquired Conditions: Knowing, Preventing,
and Treating .
At the 2014 HFMA National Institute, PYA Principal and Chief Medical Officer of PYA Analytics, Kent Bottles, MD, spoke about the strategies that hospitals and health systems are using to decrease per-capita cost, while increasing quality. In the session, “Achieving Rapid Cost Reduction and Revenue Improvement by Engaging Clinicians and Administrators,” Bottles offered tactics for engagement.
Human Resources Debbies DilemmaFor this assignment, review t.docxadampcarr67227
Human Resources: Debbie's Dilemma
For this assignment, review the Debbie's Dilemma case study and complete the interactive module in Section 12.4 of your course text. Then, thoroughly address the following points in your paper:
· Use Herzberg’s two factor theory to explain Debbie’s level of motivation.
· Use Adams’ equity theory to explain Debbie’s decision to look for work elsewhere.
· Use Vroom’s expectancy theory to explain this situation.
· If you were advising the three physicians in the organization, what would you tell them they should have done when confronted by the two LPNs? Defend your advice.
Your assignment must be one to two pages in length (excluding title and reference pages). Utilize your course textbook and at least one additional scholarly source to support your conclusions and responses to the questions. Your paper and all sources must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
7.3 Organizational Change and Redesign
Organizational Design and Change
For many years, the world of business has experienced an increasing rate of change, as was predicted by Alvin Toffler (1970) nearly half a century ago. This trend has accelerated in healthcare. Toffler noted that people exhibit a natural tendency to resist change. In this section, drivers or forces that lead to change are examined first, followed by a discussion of resistance to change. Then, methods of implementing changes are described, and the impact of change on employees and managers, particularly as it relates to organizational design and healthcare, is discussed.
Drivers of Change
Two major sets of forces drive change in both profit-seeking and nonprofit organizations: internal drivers and external drivers. Each factor appears in the management of healthcare organizations.
Internal Forces
Many times, the feature that creates the greatest need for change originates from within the organization. These factors come from diverse sources, including organizational growth, a crisis, or an opportunity.
CASE
Combining Assets and Activities
The community of Tampa, Florida, has a diverse population, with healthcare being provided to persons with low incomes, extremely wealthy individuals, and a strong middle class. Three well-established physicians—an obstetrician, a gynecologist, and a urology specialist—decided that they should combine their practices into a unique new organization. They believed that numerous patients would be attracted to these separate, but interrelated, medical practices.
The three physicians worked together to create a plan. They decided that each physician would have privileges, or authority to practice, in more than one organization. Beyond their individual practices, the doctors would perform surgeries and provide additional medical care in several local area hospitals. In the new practice, their days would be divided into times in which they tend to routine examinations, to patients with medical problems.
Accountable Care Organizations and Physician Joint Ventures .docxAMMY30
Accountable Care Organizations and Physician Joint Ventures
Jeffrey P. Harrison
Chapter 9
“I will continue with diligence to keep abreast of advances in medicine. I will treat without exception all who seek my ministrations, so long as the treatment of others is not compromised thereby, and I will seek the counsel of particularly skilled physicians where indicated for the benefit of my patient.”
—from The Hippocratic Oath (modern version)
Copyright 2016 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
1
Learning Objectives
Demonstrate an understanding of the interparty relationships associated with healthcare joint ventures and accountable care organizations.
Understand some of the dynamics and controversies surrounding the concept of accountable care organizations as an alternative approach to the current marketplace.
Demonstrate a basic understanding of the patient-centered medical home with attention to how it supports network-based delivery systems.
Master the concept of physician–hospital alignment and health system integration including consumer, provider, and regulatory developments.
Assess the emerging role of medical groups and hospital-owned group practices across the continuum of healthcare services.
Copyright 2016 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
2
Key Terms and Concepts
Accountable care organization (ACO)
Clinical integration
Equity-based joint venture
Hospitalist model
Integrated physician model
Medical foundation
Patient-centered medical home (PCMH)
Copyright 2016 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
3
Introduction
A positive relationship between hospitals and physicians is important to the success of the US healthcare system, because hospitals and physicians can be both collaborators and competitors.
Many hospitals and healthcare systems have moved to various models of physician integration through which hospitals hope to capture market share and physicians seek financial security.
After the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, physician–hospital alignment became driven by another factor: cost control and quality outcomes in the accountable care era (Reiboldt 2013).
Physicians work in a wide range of settings and serve in leadership positions that have significant responsibility for quality of care.
Copyright 2016 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
4
Clinical Integration
What Is It?
Coordination of patient care between hospitals and physicians across the healthcare continuum— e.g., an accountable care organization (ACO).
Provides an opportunity to coordinate services through centralized scheduling, electronic health records, clinical pathways, management of chronic diseases, and innovative quality improvement programs.
Clinical integration is necessary to delivering high-quality, affordable care in the current environment (Jacquin 2014).
Clinical.
In the United States, managed care is becoming an increasingly popul.docxmodi11
In the United States, managed care is becoming an increasingly popular method of administering healthcare. It influences the clinical behavior of providers, as it combines the payment and delivery of healthcare into a single system, the purpose of which is to control the cost, quality, and access of healthcare services for a single bracket of health plan enrollees (Scutchfield, Lee, & Patton, 1997).
Yet, managed care often evokes strong or negative reactions from healthcare providers because they are paid a fixed amount for treating their patients, regardless of the actual cost, which may influence their level of efficiency. This can challenge the relationships between doctors and patients (Claxton, Rae, Panchal, Damico, & Lundy, 2012; Sekhri, 2000).
Research managed care's inception and study some examples. Be sure to investigate the perspectives about managed care from the vantage of both healthcare providers and patients. You can use the following keywords for your research—United States managed care, history of managed care, and managed care timeline.
Based on your research, answer the following questions in a 8- to 10-page Microsoft Word document:
What are the positive and negative aspects of managed care? Analyze the benefits and the risks for both providers and patients, and how providers should choose among managed care contracts. Conclude with your analysis and recommendations for managed care health plans. Your response should include answers to the following questions:
Summarize the history of when, how, and why managed care was developed.
Define and discuss each type of managed care organization (MCO)—health maintenance organization (HMO), preferred provider organization (PPO), and point of sale (POS).
Explain the positive and negative aspects, respectively, of managed care organization from the provider's point of view—a physician and a healthcare facility—and from a patient's point of view.
Explain the three types of incentives for providers for efficiency in the delivery of healthcare services. Explain who bears the financial risk—the provider, the patient, or the managed care organization.
Offer your recommendations, to accept or decline, for patients considering managed care health plans, with your rationale for each.
References
:
Claxton, G., Rae, M., Panchal, N., Damico, A., & Lundy, J. (2012).
Employer Health
Benefits Annual 2012 Survey
. Retrieved from http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/2012/
8345.pdf
Sekhri, N. K. (2000).
Managed care: The US experience
. Retrieved from http://www.
who.int/bulletin/archives/78%286%29830.pdf
Scutchfield F. D., Lee, J., & Patton, D. (1997). Managed care in the United States.
Journal of Public Health Medicine
,
19
(3), 251–254. Retrieved from http://
jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/3/251.full.pdf
Support your responses with examples.
Cite any sources in APA format.
.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Acute scrotum is a general term referring to an emergency condition affecting the contents or the wall of the scrotum.
There are a number of conditions that present acutely, predominantly with pain and/or swelling
A careful and detailed history and examination, and in some cases, investigations allow differentiation between these diagnoses. A prompt diagnosis is essential as the patient may require urgent surgical intervention
Testicular torsion refers to twisting of the spermatic cord, causing ischaemia of the testicle.
Testicular torsion results from inadequate fixation of the testis to the tunica vaginalis producing ischemia from reduced arterial inflow and venous outflow obstruction.
The prevalence of testicular torsion in adult patients hospitalized with acute scrotal pain is approximately 25 to 50 percent
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
New Drug Discovery and Development .....NEHA GUPTA
The "New Drug Discovery and Development" process involves the identification, design, testing, and manufacturing of novel pharmaceutical compounds with the aim of introducing new and improved treatments for various medical conditions. This comprehensive endeavor encompasses various stages, including target identification, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and post-market surveillance. It involves multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, researchers, clinicians, regulatory experts, and pharmaceutical companies to bring innovative therapies to market and address unmet medical needs.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
Pharynx and Clinical Correlations BY Dr.Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Ccm info for_auths
1. Critical Care Medicine is an international,
peer-reviewed journal that is interested in
publishing the highest quality scientific
studies in the field of critical care medi-
cine. Studies may include basic, trans-
lational, clinical, and implementation
science that bear on the field. Approxi-
mately 20% of the original manuscripts
submitted to the journal are accepted for
publication.
MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION
Manuscripts are submitted through Edi-
torial Manager®, a Web-based manuscript
tracking system in use by the Society of
Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). This sys-
tem allows authors to add a new manu-
script or check the status of a submitted
manuscript, while shortening the time
needed for processing manuscripts in the
Editorial Office and through peer review.
To submit manuscripts for consideration,
go to www.editorialmanager.com/ccmed.
Once you reach the Editorial Manager®
home page, log on to the system by creat-
ing an account or entering through your
existing account.
Editorial Manager® will easily guide
authors through the manuscript sub-
mission process. Required information
pertaining to the manuscript includes
the name, address, telephone number,
and e-mail address for the first author
and all contributing authors; affiliated
institutions; title of the manuscript; ab-
stract; and key words. An author com-
ment explaining the significance of the
work will be required. If authors wish,
they may provide optional information
that includes author’s suggested review-
ers and author’s nonpreferred reviewers.
The Editorial Office will automatically be
notified of the submission and will send
an e-mail confirming the submission of
the manuscript to the author(s). If notice
has not been received, the manuscript has
not been completely submitted. After
editorial office review of the submis-
sion and verification that it is complete,
a manuscript number will be assigned to
each submitted manuscript, which will
be used in all correspondence.
Each manuscript submission should des-
ignate one corresponding author and all
contributing authors. The number of au-
thors should be restricted to only those
persons who have truly participated in
the conception, design, execution, and
writing of the manuscript. Authors must
disclose any potential financial or ethical
conflicts of interest regarding the contents
of the submission on the title page of the
manuscript.
SCCM accepts no responsibility for man-
uscripts that are lost or destroyed through
electronic or computer problems. Authors
are encouraged to keep copies of submit-
ted manuscripts, including figures. If an
author does not receive confirmation of
submission into Editorial Manager® with-
in 48 hours, he or she should contact the
Editorial Office at journals@sccm.org.
Copyright. Each author must complete
and submit the journal’s copyright trans-
fer agreement, which includes a section
on the disclosure of potential conflicts of
interest based on the recommendations of
the International Committee of Medical
Journal Editors, “Uniform Requirements
for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical
Journals” (www.icmje.org/update.html).
The form must be completed by each
author. When the corresponding author
submits the manuscript, the co-authors
are automatically sent an email containing
a link to complete the form online. For ad-
ditional information about electronically
signing this form, go to http://links.lww.
com/ZUAT/A106.
Compliance With NIH and Other Re-
search Funding Agency Accessibil-
ity Requirements. A number of research
funding agencies now require or request
authors to submit the post-print (the
article after peer review and acceptance
but not the final published article) to
a repository that is accessible online
by all without charge. As a service to
our authors, Wolters Kluwer will iden-
tify to the National Library of Medicine
(NLM) articles that require deposit and
will transmit the post-print of an article
based on research funded in whole or in
part by the National Institutes of Health,
Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medi-
cal Institute, or other funding agencies
to PubMed Central. The revised Copy-
right Transfer Agreement provides the
mechanism.
Financial Disclosure and Conflicts of
Interest. Authors must state all possible
conflicts of interest in the manuscript, in-
cluding financial, consultant, institutional,
and other relationships that might lead to
bias or a conflict of interest. If there is no
conflict of interest, this should also be
explicitly stated on the title page as none
declared. All sources of funding should be
acknowledged in the manuscript. All rel-
evant conflicts of interest and sources of
funding should be included on the title
page of the manuscript with the heading
Instructions for Authors
Critical Care Medicine is the official journal of the
Society of Critical Care Medicine and is published
monthly by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and
Wolters Kluwer.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
PRESIDENT
Todd Dorman, MD, FCCM
Senior Associate Dean for Education Coordination
Associate Dean Continuing Medical Education
Professor & Vice Chair for Critical Care
Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care
Medicine
Joint Appointments in Medicine, Surgery
and the School of Nursing
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland USA
PRESIDENT-ELECT
Ruth M. Kleinpell, RN-CS, PhD, FCCM
Director, Center for Clinical Research and Scholarship
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois USA
TREASURER
Jerry J. Zimmerman, MD, PhD, FCCM
Faculty in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Seattle Children’s Hospital
University of Washington School of Medicine
Seattle, Washington USA
SECRETARY
Heatherlee Bailey, MD, FCCM
Durham VA Medical Center
Department of Emergency Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, USA
PAST PRESIDENT
Craig M. Coopersmith, MD, FCCM
Professor of Surgery
Director, Surgical Intensive Care Unit
Associate Director, Emory Center for Critical Care
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia USA
SCCM COUNCIL
Sandralee A. Blosser, MD, FCCM
Daniel R. Brown, MD, PhD, FCCM
Cherylee W. Chang, MD, FCCM
Heidi L. Frankel, MD, FCCM
Kyle J. Gunnerson, MD
Sandra L. Kane-Gill, PharmD, MS, FCCM
Lewis J. Kaplan, MD, FCCM
Lynn A. Kelso, MSN, ACNP, FCCM
Greg S. Martin, MD, MSc, FCCM
M. Michele Moss, MD, FCCM
Vinay M. Nadkarni, MD, FCCM
Jose J. Pascual, MD, PhD, FACS
Lauren R. Sorce, ACNP, CCRN, FCCM
Antoinette Spevetz, MD, FACP, FCCM
Samuel A. Tisherman, MD, FCCM
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
David Julian Martin, CAE
SCCM STAFF LIAISON
Diana Hughes, CAE
www.sccm.org
2. “Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding.”
For example:
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Fund-
ing: “Author A” has received honoraria from
“Company 1.”“Author B”is currently receiving
a grant (#12345) from “Organization Y,” and
is on the speaker’s bureau for “Organization
X”–the CME organizers for Company 1. The
remaining authors have disclosed that they do
not have any conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Subjects. All studies of
human subjects must contain a statement
within the Materials and Methods section
indicating approval of the study by the Insti-
tutional Review Board (or institutional re-
view body) that subjects have signed written
informed consent, or that the Institutional
Review Board waived the need for informed
consent. Before your submission can be sent
out for peer review, it is necessary that you
address this issue of institutional review ap-
proval. This is in accordance with the Interna-
tional Committee of Journal Editors uniform
requirements for manuscripts submitted to
biomedical journals. Please see http://www.
icmje.org for more details. All animal studies
must contain a statement within the Materi-
als and Methods section confirming approval
by the Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee and that the care and handling
of the animals were in accord with National
Institutes of Health guidelines or other in-
ternationally recognized guideline for ethical
animal treatment.
Statistical Review. Any study containing
quantitative data and statistical inference
should be reviewed by a consultant with for-
mal statistical training and experience.
Although this journal does not provide
specific guidance on statistical reporting,
compliance with generally accepted recom-
mendations (e.g., Bailar JC III, Mosteller F:
Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles
for medical journals: Amplifications and ex-
planations. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108:266-
273) is suggested.
Clinical Trials. This journal has adopted the
definition and recommendations of the Inter-
national Committee of Medical Journal Edi-
tors (see http://www.icmje.org) pertaining to
registration of clinical trials. All clinical trials
must be registered.
A clinical trial is any research project that pro-
spectively assigns people or a group of people
to an intervention, with or without concur-
rent comparison or control groups, to study
the cause-and-effect relationship between a
health-related intervention and a health out-
come. Health-related interventions are those
used to modify a biomedical or health-related
outcome; examples include drugs, surgical
procedures, devices, behavioral treatments,
educational programs, dietary interventions,
quality improvement interventions, and pro-
cess-of-care changes. Health outcomes are
any biomedical or health-related measures
obtained in patients or participants, includ-
ing adverse events. This journal exempts
trials in which the primary goal is to deter-
mine pharmacokinetics from the registration
requirement.
This journal accepts registration in any reg-
istry that is a primary register of the World
Health Organization (WHO) International
Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)
(http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/primary/
en/index.html) or in ClinicalTrials.gov (http://
ClinicalTrials.gov), which is a data provider to
the WHO ICTRP. The registration number
and registry name must be included with the
manuscript submission.
MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION
Manuscripts must conform to Critical Care
Medicine Instructions for Authors and/or
the “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts
Submitted to Biomedical Journals,” which can
be found on the International Committee of
Medical Journal Editors web site, www.icmje.
org. Manuscripts must be double-spaced with
pages numbered consecutively, beginning
with the title page. Each paragraph should be
indented with a tab. The text portion of each
manuscript should be in Microsoft Word for-
mat, including references and figure legends.
Figures can be saved in .tif or .eps format in
300 DPI or higher. Tables should be submitted
as Microsoft Word files; spreadsheets are not
acceptable. Figures should be saved as sepa-
rate files and uploaded after the text upload
is complete. Specific guidelines for figure for-
matting are found on the Editorial Manager®
home page. Documents submitted in .pdf for-
mat are not acceptable.
When uploading the text, tables, and figures
into Editorial Manager®, there is the option of
entering files for review and files for produc-
tion. Files for review are viewable by the edito-
rial staff, the editor, and the reviewers. These
documents should include all text, tables,
and figures, as well as any special referenced
material. Files for production are only seen
by the editorial staff and will not be seen by
reviewers.
MANUSCRIPT CONTENT
Title Page. The title page should contain
1) the title; 2) first name, middle initial, and
last name of each author; 3) highest academic
degrees, fellowship designations, and insti-
tutional affiliation for each author; 4) name
of the institution(s) where the work was
performed; 5) the address for reprints and a
statement regarding whether reprints will be
ordered; and 6) financial support used for the
study, including any institutional departmen-
tal funds. The authors should also provide six
key words for indexing, using terms from the
Medical Subject Headings list of Index Medi-
cus. Structured abstracts are required for all
manuscripts (except editorials, letters, and
book reviews) submitted to Critical Care
Medicine.
Editorial Manager® will prompt authors to
input the above information into specific
fields as they are submitting their manuscript.
Authors should also upload their title page
and structured abstract with the body of the
manuscript. It is also important to note that
if there is formatted text or Greek letters or
symbols in the title or abstract, special coding
is necessary and the Character Palette in Edi-
torial Manager® will need to be used. It is not
necessary to code special characters and formats
in the actual manuscript.
Abstracts. Abstracts should be no more than
300 words in length and must have the follow-
ing headings: Objective, Design, Setting, Pa-
tients (for Clinical Investigations) or Subjects
(for Laboratory Investigations), Interventions,
Measurements and Main Results, and Conclu-
sions. Review Articles, Special Articles, and
Case Reports should use these headings in the
abstract: Objective, Data Sources, Study Se-
lection, Data Extraction, Data Synthesis, and
Conclusions. For details regarding the prepa-
ration of structured abstracts, refer to the
American Medical Association Manual of Style,
Tenth Edition (pp. 20–23).
Text Material. The text should be written in
standard scientific English. Authors should
carefully proofread their text prior to sub-
mission. Text that is poorly written will lead
to summary rejection. The text should be
organized into the following sections: In-
troduction, Materials and Methods, Results,
Discussion, and Conclusions followed by Ac-
knowledgments, References, Figure Legends,
and Tables. Secretarial and editorial assis-
tance are not acknowledged. Results may be
presented in the text, in the figures, or in the
tables. The Discussion section should inter-
pret the results without unnecessary repeti-
tion. References to related studies should be
included in the text section.
In addition, the following should be observed:
• Abbreviations should be minimized and
avoided wherever possible. The full term
for which an abbreviation stands should
be used at its first occurrence in the
text unless it is a standard unit of mea-
sure. The abbreviation should appear in
parentheses after the full term. Abbre-
viations should not be in the title, figure
legends, or table titles.
3. • Do not use values that are more signifi-
cant than your analysis is capable of ac-
curately measuring (e.g., Pao2
84 torr
[11.2 kPa], not 83.7 torr).
References. All references should be cited in
sequential order in the text and typed on a
separate sheet of paper. References should be
identified in text, tables, and legends by full-
size Arabic numerals on the line and in paren-
theses. Do not use wordprocessing footnote,
endnote, or paragraph numbering functions
to make a list of references. Titles of journals
should be set in italics and abbreviated ac-
cording to the style used in Index Medicus. If
journal titles are not listed in Index Medicus,
they should be spelled out. Unpublished data
or personal communications should be noted
parenthetically within the text but not in the
References section. Inclusive page numbers
(e.g., p. 1-10) should be used for all references.
Listed below are samples of standard referenc-
es; however, a complete listing of references
can be found on the International Commit-
tee of Medical Journal Editors web site, www.
icmje.org.
Standard Journal Article: Bone RC, Fisher CJ,
Cemmer TP, et al: Sepsis syndrome: A valid
clinical entity. Crit Care Med 1989; 17:389-393
Standard Book with Authors: Civetta JM, Tay-
lor RW, Kirby RR. Critical Care. Third Edition.
Philadelphia, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins,
1996
Standard Book with Editors: Norman IJ, Refern
SJ (Eds): Mental Health Care for Elderly People.
New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1996
Standard Chapter in a Book: Phillips SJ,
Whisnant JP: Hypertension and stroke. In:
Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis
and Management. Second Edition. Laragh JH,
Brenner BM (Eds). New York, Raven Press,
1995, pp 465-478
Standard Web Site/Electronic Format: Marion
DW, Domeier R, Dunham CM, et al: Practice
management guidelines for identifying cervi-
cal spine injuries following trauma. Available
at: http://www.east.org. Accessed July 1, 2000
Equations. Equations should be created as
normal text or as images. The use of equation
editors or utilities may not convert correctly
during the manuscript submission process
and their use is discouraged.
Tables and Figures. The number of figures
and tables should be appropriate for the
length of the manuscript and should not
exceed a total of 5 figures and tables (e.g.,
3 figures and 2 tables); additional figures
and tables can be submitted as Supplemen-
tal Digital Content. Tables should be num-
bered consecutively with no A or B add ons.
All tables expanding more than 8 columns
wide and 40 rows in length must be submit-
ted as Supplemental Digital Content. Tables
that are found to be too extensive to fit on
a single printed page will be sent back to
the author to reclassify as Supplemental
Digital Content. Materials reproduced from
another published source must be labeled
“Reproduced with permission from… .” In
addition, a letter granting permission to re-
produce the materials from the copyright
holder must be received by SCCM when the
manuscript is submitted for review. If the
manuscript is accepted for publication, it
will not be able to be printed unless this per-
mission letter has been submitted. Adapted
figure or table materials must be labeled
“Adapted with permission from… .” Letters
of permission are also required for adapted
materials. A sample of a permission request
can be found on Editorial Manager® in the
instruction section.
Tables. Tables expanding more than 8 col-
umns wide and 40 rows in length should
be submitted as Supplemental Digital Con-
tent. If, when processing your manuscript,
we find that your tables do not comply, the
manuscript will be sent back for correction.
Every table submitted must have applicable
table headings and a table title (a short and
to the point explanation of what the table
is and not a full description, that should be
reserved for the text). Do not use tabs to
create tables and do not use table editors.
Table building utilities will convert, provid-
ing that no special images were inserted.
Do not reiterate tabular data in the text. Do
not use abbreviations in table titles. Do not
use all capital letters in table headings and
text. Do not use center, decimal tab, and
justification commands. Do not use spaces
to separate columns. Use a single tab, not a
space, on either side of the ± symbol. Do not
underline or draw lines within tables. Foot-
noted information should be referenced
using italicized, superscript, lower case let-
ters (i.e., a, b
) in alphabetical order (reading
from left to right). Avoid lengthy footnotes
and insert descriptive narratives in the text
or in the Supplemental Digital Content as
appropriate.
Figures.
A) Creating Digital Artwork
1. Learn about the publication requirements for
Digital Artwork: http://links.lww.com/ES/A42
2. Create, scan, and save your artwork and
compare your final figure to the Digital Art-
work Guideline Checklist (below).
3. Upload each figure to Editorial Manager®
in conjunction with your manuscript text and
tables.
B) Digital Artwork Guideline Checklist
Here are the basics to have in place before sub-
mitting your digital art:
• Artwork should be saved as .tif or .eps
files.
• Artwork is created as the actual size
(or slightly larger) it will appear in the
journal. (To get an idea of the size im-
ages should be when they print, study
a copy of the journal to which you wish
to submit. Measure the artwork typi-
cally shown and scale your image to
match.)
• Crop out any white or black space sur-
rounding the image.
• Diagrams, drawings, graphs, and other
line art must be vector or saved at a reso-
lution of at least 1200 dpi.
• Photographs, radiographs, and other
halftone images must be saved at a reso-
lution of at least 300 dpi.
• Photographs and radiographs with text
must be saved as postscript or at a resolu-
tion of at least 600 dpi.
• Each figure must be saved and submit-
ted as a separate file. Figures should not
be embedded in the manuscript text
file.
Remember:
• Cite figures consecutively in your
manuscript.
• Number figures in the figure legend in
the order in which they are discussed.
• Upload figures consecutively to the Edi-
torial Manager® Web site and number
figures consecutively in the Description
box during upload.
For captions and variables within a figure, use
Helvetica (or Arial) font, if possible, in upper
and lower case letters. Radiographic prints
must have arrows (if applicable) for clarity.
Color photographs will occasionally be pub-
lished in the journal if use of color is vital to
making the point; authors will be charged the
cost of color reproduction. Figures that do not
conform to these specifications will be sent
back to the corresponding author for correc-
tion. All abbreviations used in the figure must
be spelled out in the legend.
Figure legends should contain enough in-
formation for the reader to understand the
illustration without referring to the text, but
should be concise and should not repeat in-
formation already stated in the text. Figure
legends should be typed on a separate page.
Figures must be referenced sequentially in
the text. Authors must assume charges for
changes made to figures after manuscripts are
accepted.
Units of Measure. Authors should provide
units of measurement in SI units. Authors
should refer to the American Medical Associa-
4. tion Manual of Style, Tenth Edition (p 787) for
details regarding SI units for laboratory data.
Where customary or conventional units of
measurements are clinically more familiar—
such as hemodynamic measurements for pres-
sure (typically reported in mm Hg) and gas
tension measurements (typically reported in
torr), the SI value and SI units should be re-
ported in parentheses (e.g., Pao2
84 torr [11.2
kPa]). The units of vascular resistance are
dyne.sec/cm5
.
Manufacturer. Provide in parentheses the
model number, name of manufacturer, their
city, and state or country, for all equipment
described in the paper.
Drug Names. Only generic drug names should
be used. Trademark or brand names should
not be used except in specific cases where the
brand name is essential to reproduce or in-
terpret the study. These exceptions should be
noted in accompanying correspondence. The
manufacturer with the city, state, and country
must be provided for any brand name drugs.
Permissions. Any submitted materials that
are to be reproduced (or adapted) from copy-
righted publications must be accompanied by
a written letter of permission from the copy-
right holder. Accepted manuscripts will be
delayed if necessary permissions are not on
file. A sample of a permission request can be
found on Editorial Manager® in the instruc-
tion section.
Supplemental Digital Content: Authors may
submit Supplemental Digital Content to en-
hance their article’s text and to be considered
for online-only posting. Supplemental Digital
Content may include the following types of
content: text documents (including software
code), graphs, tables, figures, graphics, il-
lustrations, audio, and video. Tables that are
too long to fit on a single printed page of the
journal should be submitted as Supplemental
Digital Content. Any appendices being sub-
mitted should be submitted as Supplemental
Digital Content. Cite all Supplemental Digital
Content consecutively in the text. Citations
should include the type of material submitted,
should be clearly labeled as “Supplemental
Digital Content,” should include a sequential
number, and should provide a brief descrip-
tion of the supplemental content. Provide a
legend of Supplemental Digital Content at the
end of the text. List each legend in the order
in which the material is cited in the text. The
legends must be numbered to match the cita-
tions from the text. Include a title and a brief
summary of the content. For audio and video
files, also include the author name, videogra-
pher, participants, length (minutes), and size
(MB). Authors should mask patients’ eyes and
remove patients’ names from Supplemental
Digital Content unless they obtain written
consent from the patients and submit written
consent with the manuscript. Copyright and
Permission forms for article content including
Supplemental Digital Content must be com-
pleted at the time of submission.
Supplemental Digital Content Size and File
Type Requirements: To ensure a quality expe-
rience for those viewing Supplemental Digital
Content, it is suggested that authors submit
supplemental digital files no larger than 10
MB each. Documents, graphs, and tables may
be presented in any format. Figures, graphics,
and illustrations should be submitted with
the following file extensions: .tif, .eps, .ppt,
.jpg, .pdf, .gif. Audio files should be submit-
ted with the following file extensions: .mp3,
.wma. Video files should be submitted with
the following file extensions: .wmv, .mov, .qt,
.mpg, .mpeg, .mp4. Video files should also be
formatted with a 320 x 240 pixel minimum
screen size. For more information, please re-
view publisher requirements for submitting
Supplemental Digital Content: http://links.
lww.com/A142.
MANUSCRIPT CATEGORIES
Guidelines for the most frequent types of arti-
cles submitted to the journal are summarized
below.
Original Articles. These include randomized
controlled trials, intervention studies, labora-
tory and animal research, outcome studies,
cost-effectiveness analyses, and case-control
series. The objective and hypothesis of these
articles should be clearly stated. Information
should be included about study design and
methodology, including study setting and
time setting; participants, including inclu-
sion and exclusion criteria; any interventions;
main outcome measures; main study results;
discussion that puts the results in the context
of other published literature; and conclusions.
The recommended length for original manu-
script is 3000 or fewer (12 or fewer typed,
double-spaced pages), not including referenc-
es, tables, or figures. Original articles should
include not more than 5 tables and figures in
total (e.g., 3 figures and 2 tables) and not more
than 50 references. Additional figures, tables,
and explanatory material should be submit-
ted as Supplemental Digital Content, as noted
above. Authors should include the word count
on the title page.
Review Articles. These consist of critical as-
sessment of literature and data pertaining to
clinical topics. In these review articles, em-
phasis should be placed on cause, diagnosis,
therapy, prognosis, and prevention. Informa-
tion concerning the type of study or analysis,
population, intervention, and outcome should
be included for all data used. The selection
process used for all data should be described
using standard methodologies. Meta-analyses
will be considered as review papers. Review ar-
ticles should not exceed 3000 words (12 typed,
double-spaced pages) and should include not
more than a total of 5 figures and tables (e.g., 3
figures and 2 tables).Additional figures, tables,
and explanatory material should be submit-
ted as Supplemental Digital Content, as noted
above. Authors should include the word count
on the title page.
Brief Reports. These should be short reports
of original studies or evaluations. They should
contain a short, structured abstract and no
more than 10 references and 1 to 2 figures or
tables. Brief Reports should be no more than
1500 words (6 typed, double-spaced pages).
Authors should include the word count on the
title page.
Case Reports. Case reports will be considered
for publication only rarely, and then only if the
case is unique with respect to the problem or
novel with respect to management. Case re-
ports should be approximately less than 2000
words (up to 8 typed, double-spaced pages).
They must include a structured abstract.
The number of references, tables, and figures
should be appropriate for the overall length of
the paper. In general, no more than 2 tables or
2 figures are necessary.
Letters to the Editor. Letters to the Editor
are encouraged. Letters must specifically ad-
dress a recent article published in Critical Care
Medicine and may not report any new, unre-
viewed data. They should be no more than 500
words (2 typed, double-spaced pages) with 5
references.
Invited Editorial. These represent commen-
taries addressing newly published articles
in the journal and are by invitation only. In-
vited editorials should be no more than 1500
words (6 typed double-spaced pages) with a
maximum of 15 references and a maximum
of 2 figures and/or tables. See “Writing Edito-
rials for Critical Care Medicine” on the main
Editorial Manager® login page under Files and
Resources.
Invited Viewpoint. These represent opposing
positions taken in a point/counterpoint for-
mat and are by invitation only. Suggestions for
topics and presenters for point/counterpoint
segments may be submitted to journals@
sccm.org. Suggestions will be reviewed by
the editors. Invited viewpoints should be no
more than 1500 words (6 typed double-spaced
pages) with a maximum of 25 references and a
maximum of 3 figures and/or tables.
EDITORIAL REVIEW
All manuscripts will be reviewed by Editorial
Board members or consultants selected by the
editor-in-chief. Initial editorial reviews usually
are completed within 4 weeks of manuscript
5. submission. The time required for review of
revised manuscripts is variable. For further in-
formation, please see the Foreword to the May
2015 issue of Critical Care Medicine, entitled
“The Review Process”, which can be found on
the main Editorial Manager® login page under
Files and Resources.
ACCEPTANCE
All information regarding the accepted manu-
script and its publication date are confidential.
No information regarding the manuscript can
appear in print, on the television or radio, or
in any electronic form until the day before its
publication date. It cannot be released to the
media until the day before the publication
date.
Manuscripts accepted for publication are
copyedited and returned to the author for
approval. Authors are responsible for all
statements published in their work, including
any changes made by the copy editor. Authors
are encouraged to proofread all edited manu-
scripts carefully. The journal reserves the
right to charge authors for excessive changes
made to the text and figures at the page proof
stage.
Permissions
For permission and/or rights to use content
for which the copyright holder is the Society
of Critical Care Medicine or Wolters Kluwer,
Inc., please go to the journal’s Web site and
after clicking on the relevant article, click on
the “Request Permissions” link under the “Ar-
ticle Tools” box that appears on the right side
of the page. Alternatively, send an e-mail to
customercare@copyright.com.
For Translation Rights & Licensing queries,
contact Silvia Serra, Translations Rights, Li-
censing & Permissions Manager, Wolters
Kluwer Health (Medical Research) Ltd, 250
Waterloo Road, London SE1 8RD, UK. Phone:
+44 (0) 207 981 0600. E-mail: silvia.serra@
wolterskluwer.com.
For Special Projects and Reprints (U.S./Can-
ada), contact Alan Moore, Director of Sales,
Wolters Kluwer, Inc., Two Commerce Square,
2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Phone: 215-521-8638. E-mail: alan.moore@
wolterskluwer.com.
For Special Projects and Reprints (non-U.S./
Canada), contact the Translations Rights,
Licensing & Permissions Manager, Wolters
Kluwer Health (Medical Research) Ltd, 250
Waterloo Road, London SE1 8RD, UK. Phone:
+44 (0) 207 981 0600. E-mail: silvia.serra@
wolterskluwer.com.
OPEN ACCESS
A hybrid open access (OA) option is offered
to authors whose articles have been accepted
for publication. With this choice, articles are
made freely available online immediately
upon publication. All authors of manuscripts
that are accepted to Critical Care Medicine will
be given the opportunity to select the OA op-
tion. Options for OA publishing include so-
called “Gold OA” and “Green OA.”
Gold OA for authors who opt for an OA
option. Authors may choose to have articles
published in final form as OA. Authors must
sign a license giving the publisher the right to
publish the article, create derivatives, and sell
reprints. The authors retain the copyright and
anyone can use the article for non-commercial
purposes with proper attribution to the au-
thor and links to the original article. Authors
will sign a license that will give him/her the
rights outlined in the Creative Commons:
Attribution-Non Commercial-No Deriva-
tives (CC BY-NC-ND) License. This license
does not permit commercial exploitation
or the creation of derivative works without
specific permission. Additionally, all authors
who choose the OA option will have their
final published article deposited into PubMed
Central (PMC). An article processing charge
(APC) of $3,100 per article is levied.
Gold OA for authors funded by RCUK and
Wellcome Trust. Authors funded by RCUK
and Wellcome Trust are required to publish
OA and must sign a license giving the pub-
lisher the right to publish the article. The au-
thors retain copyright but anyone may reuse
the article and create derivatives, even for
commercial purposes, with proper attribu-
tion to the author and links to the original
article. Authors will be required to publish, as
per the RCUK mandate and Wellcome Trust
policy, under the Creative Commons: Attribu-
tion (CC-BY) License. Only RCUK and Well-
come Trust authors are allowed to choose this
option and must pay an APC of $3,900 per
article.
Green OA for authors funded by RCUK
and Wellcome Trust. Authors funded by
RCUK and Wellcome Trust are required
to publish OA and sign a license giving the
publisher the right to publish the article.
The authors retain copyright but anyone
may reuse the article and create derivatives
with proper attribution. Authors will be re-
quired to publish, as per the RCUK man-
date and Wellcome Trust policy, under the
Attribution Noncommercial (CC BY-NC)
license. However, with green OA, authors
do not pay an APC and their articles are de-
posited into PMC with an embargo period
of at least 6 months.
The APC (when required) is requested when
an article is accepted and should be paid
within 30 days by credit card by the author,
funding agency, or institution. Payment
must be received in full before the article is
published OA.
With both the gold and green OA options, all
authors will continue to sign the Copyright
Transfer Agreement (CTA) as these forms
provide the mechanism for the publisher to
ensure that the authors are fully compliant
with the requirements. The CTA forms are
signed by all authors at manuscript submis-
sion. When an OA option is chosen after
acceptance, the Corresponding Author (on
behalf of all authors) will also sign a Li-
cense to Publish. The authors will retain the
copyright.
It is the responsibility of the Corresponding
Author to inform the Critical Care Medicine
Editorial Office that they have RCUK or Well-
come Trust funding. Neither the SCCM nor
Wolters Kluwer, Inc., will be held responsible
for retroactive deposits to PMC if the author
has not completed the proper forms.
REPRINTS
Reprints are available four weeks after the pub-
lication of the journal through the publisher.
For information and prices, call (800) 341-
2258 or send an email to reprints@lww.com.
CONTACT
Questions regarding the status of submitted
manuscripts are best answered by logging on
to the FAQ section of Editorial Manager®. The
assigned manuscript number will allow au-
thors to view the status of their manuscript. If
authors need additional information regard-
ing a manuscript, please send an e-mail to
journals@sccm.org and include your manu-
script number in the request, or call (847)
827-6869 Monday through Friday, from 0800
to 1700, Central Standard Time.
Correspondence can also be sent to:
Timothy G. Buchman, PhD, MD, MCCM
Editor-in-Chief, Critical Care Medicine
Society of Critical Care Medicine
500 Midway Drive
Mount Prospect, IL 60056