2. Presentation Road Map
The significant of CCPP development towards sustainability of energy supply
Project Background
Project Necessity
Comparison with Other Option.
UNFCC Statistic – Carbon
footprint
Technical Aspect
Pollution Prevention Measures
Natural Environment
Social Environment
Project Scope
Power Output
Scope of implementation
Power Output
Scope of implementation
Environmental & Social
Consideration
Project Cost
Kuantan Site
Kapar Site
Project Schedule
2015 – 2020
Commencement: 2021
1 2 3 4 5 6
3. Project Necessity
Ensuring electricity supply security through better
management of resources
Focus area E: Encouraging sustainable energy
use to support growth
New generation capacity
installed
in Peninsular Malaysia by 2020
(RMK-11)
5. Natural Gas enabling the energy transition
High level of efficiency
Up to 50% Cleaner than
any Other fossil fuel
Improve the air we
breathe
6. Comparison with Other Options
Alternative Contents Description
Proposal 1 Construction of an ultra-
supercritical coal-fired power
plant
Low generation Cost (Coal Price).
Obligation to make effort in reduce GHG target
value thru COP21.
Efficiency only up to 42%.
Initial Fund exceed 200B Yen.
Proposal 2 Increase of power trading
volume (no construction of a
power plant)
Increase power trading from neighbor countries.
Constant imported power can cause significant
economic damage.
Proposal 3 Introduction of renewable
energy
Lower intensity of power generation compared to
fossil fuel.
Stable power supply cannot be expected,
CCPP are operated as load adjusting power
source.
CCPP will play important role in big cities area.
CCPP extremely reliable and proven latest technology of Gas Turbine (M701J) with high
efficiency CCGT in 2015. improved up to 60%. Enhancement of use of natural Gas. Tremendous
Reduction in CO2 Emission. Proven with more than 10, ooo operating hours in Tokyo.
7. Project Scope
500 – 700 MW x 2 units
High Efficiency CCPP based on
1600 C class gas turbine (LHV up
to 60%)
Reduction of GHG emissions
such CO2
Target Sites Kuantan and Kapar
Power Output and Quantity 500 to 700 MW x 2 unit
Scope of Implementation Complete set of Combined cycle power generation plant
Civil Engineering and Construction
Detail Design of CCPP
Production, transportation and installation of a combined cycle power plant
(gas turbine and its accessories, steam turbine & accs, HRSG & accs, electric
facility, control facility, environment facility, pneumatic facility, cooling water
facility, fire fighting facility, etc)
Test operation of power plant
Consulting service
Outside scope of
Implementation
Implemented under TNB
Power plant, transmission line, substation, gas construction site
accommodation associated with this project
8. Technical Aspect
Candidates sites
Comparison and evaluation
GT Selection
Shaft Configuration
Power System Analysis
Site Layout PlanEnvironmental
Financial and economics
Technical approach
9. Selling your idea Candidate
Sites?
Kapar, Selangor
Kuantan, Pahang
Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan
Pasir Gudang, Johor
Pulau Indah, Selangor
10. Difficulties in:
- Land acquisition
- Construct transmission line &
gas pipeline
- Technical diffculties point of
view
Designated site for separate
project commonly known
as Track 4A Project
PIC – Pengerang Co-
generation Plant (PCP),
1,220 MW:
620 MW utilised by RAPID
600 MW exported to the
grid
11. Conditions are favorable No particular problem
Serious problems (cannot be solved) There are some problems (can be addressed)
Location Comparison and Evaluation
Ensuring electricity supply security through better
management of resources
Focus area E: Encouraging sustainable energy
use to support growth
Land
Acquis
ition
Site Area Geo.
Features
Fresh
water
Supply
Intake &
dischar
ge
channel
Gas
Supply
Power
cable
and
substatio
n
Possible
impacts on
environme
nt &
Society
Kapar
Port
Dickson
Kuantan
Notes :
12. Selection of Candidate Sites
Type of Candidate
GT
GT26
Alstorm Power
9F.05
GE
M701J
Mitsubishi
SGT5-8000H
Siemens
Gross Thermal
Efficiency (%)
58.4 57.4 60.3 58.7
Plant Gross Power
Output (MW)
448.9 405.2 629.4 536.4
GT Selection
Criteria of candidates sites
Sufficiently large area natural gas supply seawater & sea depth
sufficiently deep
Fresh water supply Transmission line and substation Road, port access &
infrastructure facilities
13. Shaft Configuration
Description Type of Shaft
A : 1 on 1 Multi-shaft B : 2 on 1 Multi-shaft C : single-shaft
Thermal Efficiency Base Base +0,3% Base + 0.1%
Construction Cost Base Base + 10.2% Base + 5.1%
Power Gen Cost Base Base + 2.3% Base + 1.2%
Influence of Electrical
Networks
Base Double Same
Maintenance Cost Base Slightly Less Slightly Less
Power System Analysis
**Conducted by TNB. Power system analysis not disclosed to 3rd party
TNB confirmed there are no problem to grid in Malaysia when 1000MW – 1400 MW CCPP put into
operation
14. Technical Approach
Item J Type GT base CCPP USC Coal Fired Thermal PP
Gross Thermal Efficiency 19.7% increament
(61.7%)
Base (42%)
CO2 Emission 17,556345 tCO / year
decrease
Base
Type of Candidate
GT
GT26
Alstorm Power
9F.05
GE
M701J
Mitsubishi
SGT5-8000H
Siemens
Gross Thermal
Efficiency (%)
58.4 57.4 60.3 58.7
Plant Gross Power
Output (MW)
448.9 405.2 629.4 536.4
GT Selection
CCPP to achieve max. energy-saving effect and reduction on environmental impact
18. Highly adequate; this item is no factor that been assessed on environmental impact
Moderately adequate; this item is able to avoid environmental impact by implementation of
mitigation measures based on investigation.
Adequate with consideration; This item needs to take into consideration of environmental impact
Screening for Environmental Aspect
Item
Kuantan Kapar
Environmental & Social Consideration
Pollution Prevention
Measures
Kuantan
Air quality
Water quality
Waste
Soil Contamination
Noise & Vibration
Subsidence
Odor
19. Screening for Environmental Aspect (cont..)
Item
Kuantan Kapar
Environmental & Social Consideration
Natural Environment
Protected Areas
Ecosystem and biota
Topography & Geology
Social Environment
Resettlement and land
acquisition
Living and livelihood
Heritage
Landscape
Ethnic minorities & indigenous
people
Working Condition
20. Highly adequate; this item is no factor that been assessed on environmental impact
Moderately adequate; this item is able to avoid environmental impact by implementation of
mitigation measures based on investigation.
Adequate with consideration; This item needs to take into consideration of environmental impact
Item
Kuantan Kapar
Environmental & Social Consideration
Others
Impacts during construction
Accident prevention
Monitoring
Screening for Environmental Aspect (cont..)
21. **1 land for construction site already owned by TNB, for financial analysis purposes. Estumated 15.6/ft² (50 acre) & land reclamation RM130M
**2; Contingency (Physical) estimated at 10% of total construction costs exclude land acquisition
**3; Interest during construction estimated based funding by JICA Yen Loan
Component
Kuantan Site Kapar Site
Total Cost
(JP ¥ Mill)
Foreign Currency
(JP ¥ Mill)
Total Cost
(JP ¥ Mill)
Foreign Currency
(JP ¥ Mill)
A . Construction Work : Sub-total 108,405.0 73,015.5 118,477.8 83,892.1
Power Plant 92,204.1 64,543.1 92,204.1 64,543.1
Civil Work 4,222.4 3,854.4 16,041..0 14,184.0
Gas Supply System 250.0 200.0 490.0 392.0
Substation 4,727.0 4,253.0 5,289.0 4,760.0
Transmission Line 1,630.0 165.0 123.0 13.0
Land acquisition 5,371.5 - 4,330.7 (**1) -
B. Consulting services 1,970.3 1,577.2 1,970.3 1,577,2
C. Contingency (Physical) **2 10,840.5 7,301.,5 11,847.8 8,389.2
D. Interest during construction **3 737.9 737.9 874.6 874.6
E. Total 121,953.7 82,632.1 133,170.5 94,733.1
Total Project Cost (Before tax)
Notes:
22. Items for Consideration
Candidate Sites
Kapar Pulau Indah
Land Acquisition TNB ownership
Owned by TadMax
- Difficulty for land acquisition
from states government
Existing Infrastructure Consideration
(Transmission Line)
Existing Infrastructure
Required to build more than 60
km transmission line, nearest in
Olak Lempit (substation)
Existing Infrastructure Consideration
(Gas Pipeline)
Existing Infrastructure
Required to build the new gas
pipeline
Kapar as the Ideal candidate sites compare
to Pulau Indah
source: http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/08/12/twist-in-power-deal/
23. Oct ‘15 – Feb ‘16
March ‘16 – Dec ‘16
Jan ‘18 – Dec ‘20
Req for Yen Loan from EPU.
Study in GoJ and confirmation with NGO.
F/S by JICA.
IEA.
Selection of Consultant.
Detailed Design.
2015 2016 2017 2018 - 2020
Pre- F/S
Construction of Combined
Cycle Power Plant
Project Schedule
EIA.
Appraisal.
Pledge.
E/N and L/A.
Detailed Design.
Selection of Contractor.
Jan ‘17 – Dec ‘17
24. www.kettha.gov.my
Conclusion
Kapar site most favorable due to:
- 45% of the country’s electricity demand from Klang
Valley
- Gas Pipeline availability in Kapar, only extension line
required
- Existing Infrastructure, KPAR substation (no obstacles
exists on planned route
- Air quality in Klang Valley is critical
25. Paris Aggreement 2016
Malaysia intends to reduce its
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
intensity of GDP by 45% by 2030
relative to the emissions intensity of
GDP in 2005. This consist of 35% on
an unconditional basis and a further
10% is condition upon receipt of
climate finance, technology transfer
and capacity building from
developed countries
www.kettha.gov.my
26. Energy Sector
“We can create a more sustainable, cleaner and safer world by making wiser energy
choices”
Aiman Ali
Perdana Felo Ministry of Energy, Green Tech and Water
(Batch 4 – 2016)
Email: aimanali2509@gmail.com
Cell: +6016-7032509
www.kettha.gov.my follow us on
