This slide tells important cases about the contract and offer which will make user easily to understand the concept of offers. how a offers make good impact , how it accepted
Bailment describes a legal relationship in common law where physical possession of personal property, or a chattel, is transferred from one person (the "bailor") to another person (the "bailee") who subsequently has possession of the property. It arises when a person gives property to someone else for safekeeping and is a cause of action independent of contract or tort.
Bailment is distinguished from a contract of sale or a gift of property, as it only involves the transfer of possession and not its ownership. To create a bailment, the bailee must both intend to possess, and actually physically possess, the bailable chattel. Bailment is a typical common law concept although similar concepts exist in civil law (Spain- Depósito).
In addition, unlike a lease or rental, where ownership remains with the lessor but the lessee is allowed to use the property, the bailee is generally not entitled to the use of the property while it is in his possession.
A common example of bailment is leaving your car with a valet. Leaving your car in an unattended parking garage is typically a license rather than a bailment, as the car park's intent to possess your car cannot be shown. However, bailments arise in many other situations, including terminated leases of property, warehousing (including store-it-yourself) or in a carriage of goods.
All agreement are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object and are not expressly declared to be void.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
STRUCTURE
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Meaning of Negotiable Instruments
1.3 Characteristics of a negotiable instrument
1.4 Presumptions as to negotiable instrument
1.5 Types of negotiable Instrument
1.5.1 Promissory notes
1.5.2 Bill of exchange
1.5.3 Cheques
1.5.4 Hundis
1.6 Parties to negotiable instruments
1.6.1 Parties to Bill of Exchange
1.6.2 Parties to a Promissory Note
1.6.3 Parties to a Cheque
1.7 Negotiation
1.7.1 Modes of negotiation
1.8 Assignment
1.8.1 Negotiation and Assignment Distinguished
1.8.2 Importance of delivery in negotiation
1.9 Endorsement
1.10 Instruments without Consideration
1.11 Holder in Due Course
The slides discuss in detail the concept of Bailment, Pledge, and Hypothecation under the Indian Contract Act, 1878. Useful for Law Students and professionals.
Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Bailment describes a legal relationship in common law where physical possession of personal property, or a chattel, is transferred from one person (the "bailor") to another person (the "bailee") who subsequently has possession of the property. It arises when a person gives property to someone else for safekeeping and is a cause of action independent of contract or tort.
Bailment is distinguished from a contract of sale or a gift of property, as it only involves the transfer of possession and not its ownership. To create a bailment, the bailee must both intend to possess, and actually physically possess, the bailable chattel. Bailment is a typical common law concept although similar concepts exist in civil law (Spain- Depósito).
In addition, unlike a lease or rental, where ownership remains with the lessor but the lessee is allowed to use the property, the bailee is generally not entitled to the use of the property while it is in his possession.
A common example of bailment is leaving your car with a valet. Leaving your car in an unattended parking garage is typically a license rather than a bailment, as the car park's intent to possess your car cannot be shown. However, bailments arise in many other situations, including terminated leases of property, warehousing (including store-it-yourself) or in a carriage of goods.
All agreement are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object and are not expressly declared to be void.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
STRUCTURE
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Meaning of Negotiable Instruments
1.3 Characteristics of a negotiable instrument
1.4 Presumptions as to negotiable instrument
1.5 Types of negotiable Instrument
1.5.1 Promissory notes
1.5.2 Bill of exchange
1.5.3 Cheques
1.5.4 Hundis
1.6 Parties to negotiable instruments
1.6.1 Parties to Bill of Exchange
1.6.2 Parties to a Promissory Note
1.6.3 Parties to a Cheque
1.7 Negotiation
1.7.1 Modes of negotiation
1.8 Assignment
1.8.1 Negotiation and Assignment Distinguished
1.8.2 Importance of delivery in negotiation
1.9 Endorsement
1.10 Instruments without Consideration
1.11 Holder in Due Course
The slides discuss in detail the concept of Bailment, Pledge, and Hypothecation under the Indian Contract Act, 1878. Useful for Law Students and professionals.
Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
ASSIGNMENT: Business Law (example of answer)Rofidah Azman
I got quite good mark for this assignment. I'd like to share with other fellow students the example of answers for the questions. There are of course rooms for improvement. Good luck!
This material is for PGPSE / CSE students of AFTERSCHOOOL. PGPSE / CSE are free online programme - open for all - free for all - to promote entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship
This material is for PGPSE / CSE students of AFTERSCHOOOL. PGPSE / CSE are free online programme - open for all - free for all - to promote entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship
Exam - Contracts, Part 1 Questions 1 to 40 Select the be.docxSANSKAR20
Exam: - Contracts, Part 1
Questions 1 to 40: Select the best answer to each question. Note that a question and its answers may be split across
a page break, so be sure that you have seen the entire question and all the answers before choosing an answer.
1. Ty and Cher were discussing a business venture over dinner. Cher had several glasses of wine and became
visibly intoxicated. Ty and Cher continued to discuss the venture and formed a contract in which Ty received 80%
of the profits resulting from the venture and Cher received 20%, even though Cher agreed to invest the majority of
the money. Ty agreed to contribute his expertise and services to the venture. The next morning, Cher realized her
terrible mistake. Cher's best chance to avoid the contract with Ty is to say that
A. the contract is fraudulent.
B. she was drunk at the time the contract was formed.
C. Ty doesn't have the expertise and services required for the venture.
D. the contract is unconscionable.
2. Dave is declared insane and committed to an asylum. Dave escapes and goes to a car dealership, where he enters
into a contract with Larry to buy a sports car. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Only Larry can void the contract.
B. To void the contract, Dave must prove he is insane.
C. Only Dave can void the contract.
D. Because Dave is legally insane, the contract is void.
3. Esther lives with a caregiver on whom she is greatly dependent and trusts. The caregiver persuades Esther to sign
a contract with the caregiver that greatly favors the caregiver. If the contract is set aside, it will likely be on what
grounds?
A. Duress
B. Mistake
C. Fraud
D. Undue influence
4. Jacques offers to paint Alisha's house for $100. Before Alisha responds, Jacques dies. Which of the following
statements is true?
A. There's no contract because Alisha failed to accept Jacques's offer before he died.
B. Jacques's offer has been revoked.
C. A representative of Jacques's estate must find someone to paint Alisha's house.
D. A representative of Jacques's estate must paint Alisha's house for $100.
5. Which of the following is a necessary element both for fraud and for misrepresentation?
A. A fiduciary relationship
B. The intent to deceive
C. A hidden problem
D. A false statement
6. Jack is a mature-looking 17-year-old who lives at home with his parents. Jack wants to purchase an automobile.
Jack goes to Discount Car Sales, where Bud, the car salesman, never considers that Jack may be a minor. Bud sells
Jack a car, with the agreement that Jack will pay Bud $100 per month over the next five years for the car. Which of
the following is true?
A. Despite Jack's status as a minor, Bud can prohibit Jack from disaffirming a contract for a necessary (or basic)
need.
B. Bud can hold Jack's parents liable for Jack's contract, because Jack was a minor living in their home at the time
the contract was formed.
C. Jack c ...
Case studies on Modern Business Laws:
Legal Relationship,Agreements with Minor,Joint Promises, Illegal Agreements,Doctrine of Supervening Impossibility:
This material is for PGPSE / CSE students of AFTERSCHOOOL. PGPSE / CSE are free online programme - open for all - free for all - to promote entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship PGPSE is for those who want to transform the world. It is different from MBA, BBA, CFA, CA,CS,ICWA and other traditional programmes. It is based on self certification and based on self learning and guidance by mentors. It is for those who want to be entrepreneurs and social changers. Let us work together. Our basic idea is that KNOWLEDGE IS FREE & AND SHARE IT WITH THE WORLD
Question 1Tish entered into a contract with Michelle, in which Mic.docxJUST36
Question 1
Tish entered into a contract with Michelle, in which Michelle would redecorate Tish's bedroom to incorporate more lighting and pastel colors. The contract provided that Michelle would perform the duties in a "satisfactory and timely manner."
When the work was completed, Tish reviewed the colors and lighting, and determined that it was not satisfactory. Tish refused to pay Michelle the $5,000 due Michelle at the end of the contract, citing a breach.
Will Michelle be able to legally require Tish to pay her for this job?
A.
Michelle will be able to require Tish to pay her for her services, because the services were performed.
B.
Michelle will be able to require Tish to pay her for her services if a reasonable person would consider the job satisfactorily performed.
C.
Michelle will be able to require Tish to pay her for her services only if Tish considers the job satisfactorily performed.
D.
None of the above is true.
10 points
Question 2
Mary has a City Credit Card (CCC) and has run up a $13,000 debt. She calls the company and explains that she can't pay the full amount, but will be willing to pay $10,000 if they will forgive the other $3,000. The company agrees to accept $10,000 as payment in full. This is an example of what type of discharge of the contract?
A.
Modification of contract supported by consideration.
B.
Novation of the contract.
C.
Novation and satisfaction.
D.
Accord and Satisfaction
10 points
Question 3
David owned a ranch that was improved with about four miles of white post-and-wood fencing. David left the ranch for a month to tend to business back East, and while he was gone, Peter and Paul came by his home and left a flyer on his front door. It said "Peter and Paul's Pretty Good Fence Repair Company is in the area, and will repair and paint all fencing to look like new. We'll be working in the ranch lands, so if there are any areas of fencing that you don't want to be repaired and painted, please hang a white cloth on that section of fencing so we'll know you don't want our services." David came home a couple of weeks later and found his fencing repaired and painted, and a note on his front door explaining that the service had been provided, and the bill was enclosed.
David appreciates the repair work, but he is not sure if he is obligated to pay Peter and Paul. Which of the following is most correct?
A.
David is not obligated to pay for the services provided.
B.
David is not obligated to pay for the services because of a contractual obligation, but he did receive services from the other party, and must pay a reasonable price for those services or return them. Obviously, one cannot return fence repair and painting, so he must pay, even though there is no contract.
C.
David is obligated to pay, but only if he was negligent in not having someone watch his property during his absence. That negligence will be determined by a 'reasonable person' standard.
D.
David is obligated to pay the ...
Bugsy promises to pay Capone $4,000 if he takes care of the co.docxrichardnorman90310
Bugsy promises to pay Capone $4,000 if he "takes care" of the competition. Capone meets with the competition and disposes of him without anyone knowing. He then calls Bugsy to tell him that he should not have any more issues and demands his money. Bugsy refuses to pay telling Capone that he just made the world a better place. Capone sues Bugsy for the money.
The court will most likely find that __________________________________.
Group of answer choices
Capone will be entitled to the money because he was not in pari delecto with Bugsy.
Bugsy will not need to pay the money because he and Capone were not in pari delecto with each other.
the contract is voidable by Capone.
the contract is valid and Bugsy must pay because Capone performed his portion of the contract.
the contract is voidable by Bugsy.
the contract is void.
Sarah and Randy made a contract where Randy would remodel Sarah's bathroom for $20,000. Sarah had until July 10 to pay for it. Randy finished the work and Sarah was quite happy with it. She gave Randy rave reviews to friends. On July 9, Sarah saw Randy and because she was so thrilled with his work she promised to give him an additional $1,000. On July 10, Sarah wrote a check for $20,000 . Randy sued Sarah for the additional $1,000.
Randy will not receive the $1,000 because of ________________:
Group of answer choices
part-payment check
past consideration
moral obligation
promissory estoppel
preexisting legal obligation
Lion King was walking through the Pride Lands when he stepped on a thorn. Timon realized why he was in pain and removed the thorn. Lion King then promised to give Timon a year's worth supply of bugs and $2,000. Three weeks later, Timon asked for the bugs and money, but Lion King refused.
Timon will not receive the bugs and money because of:
Group of answer choices
preexisting legal obligation
compromise and release of claim
past consideration
moral obligation
forbearance
If a contract fails to have mutuality of obligation then there may be a(n) _______________.
Group of answer choices
adequacy of consideration
past considertion
moral obligation
consideration
illusory promise
bargained-for exchange
forbearance
Which is not an exception to the writing requirement?
Group of answer choices
promisor benefit
promisee benefit
enhanced promissory estoppel
part performance doctrine
detrimental reliance
If Randy agrees to pay Sarah's debt if Sarah should fail to pay James, then Randy has created a(n)_____________.
Group of answer choices
lien
guaranty
suretyship
estoppel
claim
Who is not a party that may handle the affairs of a deceased person and make a promise to pay claims against that person's estate?
Group of answer choices
surety
administratrix
executor
personal representative
administrator
The State of Washington requires attorneys to be licensed to practice law in the state. Peter was an attorney, who was licensed to practice law in the State of Washington. Af.
Competing for Limited FundingIn todays reality of shrinking b.docxmaxinesmith73660
Competing for Limited Funding
In today's reality of shrinking budgets, states continue to look for money that is not being effectively spent. State legislatures want to ensure they are getting the most for their limited dollars. The legislature has requested you to present an overview of an effective juvenile justice alternative sentencing program that you are aware of from the text or your research, and explain why it is effective and why it should be funded. What is the intended population? What standard are you using to measure the effectiveness? Why do you think it is effective and worthy of continued funding?
Your colleague has made a presentation to the state legislature, and now it is your turn. You are the director of an intervention strategy (before your colleagues program) or a re-entry program (after your colleague's program) that is also being looked at to help fund other priority legislative programs. The legislature believes the juvenile justice system is too soft on crime and we need to get tough on crime. For this discussion, you may support either the rehabilitation camp or the get tough on crime camp as you prepare your answer. Make sure you address the social justice arguments based on your position. Build the case for one of the following:
a. Ensure that your program is a complimentary program to that of your classmate’s, but both programs are serving separate and distinct critical populations. Both must be funded.
b. That the synergistic effect of the two programs together will result in both programs being more effective in the long run, and, therefore, enhancing social justice.
c. That your program is much more cost effective; it should be funded at the expense of the program outlined by your colleague.
Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length
Connecting the Dots - What is an Effective Program?
In Chapter 10, the text addresses primary, secondary and tertiary prevention programs. What are these levels? Give an example of an effective program in each level. Give a brief description of each program, its intended purpose, and target juvenile population. Why do you think they are effective?
When responding to one of your classmates, address one of the programs with a focus on one of the text’s questions below concerning prevention programs. Select one bullet below and present the positives and the negatives for the issue addressed:
a. Does every juvenile who has been arrested need treatment? Should all juveniles arrested receive the same treatment services? Why or why not?
b. Should prevention programs be given to everyone, and if so, where? Should we consider ethnicity, race, education, socio-economic standing?
c. Are the services worth the taxpayer costs? Consider both financial and social costs.
d. Should we mandate prevention for school aged children, their parents, or for both? What if the parents refuse to participate?
e. What role does the state have in addressing pre-criminal, status offens.
Difference between company llp and partnership firm Sandeep Kumar
This slide give an idea to the reader that how company LLP is different as compare to the partenership firm . so after going through these slides they would easly understood the concept and good understanding out of it
Consumer behavior is the study about how the consumer purchases various goods and services with his/her limited resources (income).
Utility:- Utility is the ability or power goods or services to satisfy the wants of a consumer.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
2. True/False
1. All contracts are agreements but all agreements are not
contracts.
2. There can be a contract even without consensus ad idem.
3. An agreement which is enforceable at the option of either
party is a voidable contract.
4. A void contract is one which is void ab initio.
5. A void agreement does not create any legal obligations.
6. An illegal agreement is not only void as between the
immediate parties but even the collateral transactions to
it become tainted with illegality.
7. All void agreements are illegal.
8. In an executed contract both the parties have yet to fulfill
their obligations.
3. Problem 1
A engages B for a certain work and promises to pay
such remuneration as shall be fixed by C. B does the
work. Can there be a contract?
5. Problem 2
Over a cup of coffee in a restaurant, A invites B to a
dinner at his house on a Sunday. B hires a taxi and
reaches A’s house at the appointed time, but A fails to
perform his promise.
Can B recover any damages from A?
6. Solution
No, B cannot recover the damages from A as both the
parties share a social relationship and there is no
intention to create a legal relationship.
So, it was just an agreement which is not enforceable at
law.
7. Problem 3
A takes a seat in a vehicle. Is there any contract?
8. Answer
Yes as occupying the seat is an implied gesture to take
the services of a vehicle. This is an implied contract.
9. Problem 4
A invites B to a Pajama party. B accepts the invitation.
Can there be a contract?
10. Answer
No, there cant be a contract as the friends share a social
relation. So, it is just an agreement.
11. Problem 5
A forced B to enter into a contract
at the point of pistol. What remedy
is available to B if he does not want
to bound by the contract ?
12. Answer
B can set the contract to be voidable and rescind it as
his consent was not free. The essential of a valid
contract is violated here.
13. Problem 6
Amar had two visitors in his office one evening,
Bharat and Ram. Bharat ran an event mgmt
service. Amar had hosted a party the previous
evening to celebrate his son’s birthday. Bharat had
done the mgmt for the party. Bharat had come to
Amar’s office that evening, to collect Rs20000 for
having done the work.
14. Contd...
Ram was the son of an ex- colleague of Amar.
Ram’s family had fallen into bad times. They had
accumulated a lot of debts. Ram was studying in
the final year of college. He was going around
meeting people his father had known and
soliciting money as donation, so as to be able to
finish his education. Amar was a kind person. He
told Ram that he would give him Rs5000. Ram
pleaded and said that if Amar could give him
Rs10000, he would not have to go any further to
collect money. Amar agreed to give him Rs10000
15. Contd...
While Amar was in the process of obtaining the money
to give to Bharat and Ram, the phone rang. It was
Amar’s stock broker. He informed Amar that on a
particular purchase and sale order Amar had a loss of
huge amount of money. He had to pay to the broker
Rs9 lakh, within a week. Amar was very upset. In result
he refused to pay the money agreed to Ram and
Bharat.
16. Questions :
Was there an agreement between Amar and Bharat?
Was there an agreement between Amar and Ram?
Should agreements be fulfilled?
17. Problem 7
M mowes L’s lawn without being asked by L to do so.. L
watches M do the work but does not attempt to stop
him. Is L bound to pay any charges to M?
18. Solution
Yes, L is bound to pay the remuneration as he didn’t stop
him from mowing the ground so his implied silence is
equivalent to speech here.
19. Problem 8
A promises to pay Rs.500 if he (B) beats C. B beats C
but A refuses to pay.
Can B recover the amount?
21. Problem 9
D lived as a PG with a family. He agreed with the
members of the family to share prize money of a
newspaper competition. The entry sent by D won a
prize of $750.He refused to share the amount won.
Can the members of the family recover their share?
22. Solution
Yes, as it was mutually decided and the parties intended
to bound by.
23. Problem 10
C orally offered to pay A, an auto mechanic, Rs.50 for
testing a used car which C was about to purchase from
D.A agreed and tested the car. C paid A Rs.50 in cash
for his services. Is the agreement between C and A
(a) express or implied,
(b) executory or executed,
(c) valid, void, voidable or unenforceable ?
25. Problem 11
Arun enters into a contract to sell a smuggled item to
X. The import of such type of goods is illegal under the
laws of the country. Arun refuses to deliver the item as
promised.
What are the rights of X?
26. Solution
There are no rights available to either of the parties as
the contract is void ab initio and illegal.
27. Problem 12
A agrees to buy from a jeweller a ring to be delivered to
A after two months. In the meantime, the Government
enacts a law on gold control and prohibit its dealings
in gold. When the time for delivery of the jewellery
comes, the jeweller refuses to deliver the same.
What can A do?
28. Solution
A can exercise no option and holds no rights as the
prohibition laid by the government has made the
contract void and the contract is against the law to
perform.
29. Problem 13
- Warren offered to sell a farm to Hussain for
Rs.1000
- Hussain said he would give Rs.950
- Warren refused, and Hussain then said he
would give Rs.1000
- When Warren refused, Hussain sought for
court to obtain an order for specific
performance.
Can Hussain succeed?
Was there any contract?
30. Solution
There was no contract because
Hussain’s offer of $ 950 was a
counter offer which evidently
rejected the original offer.
31. Problem 14
Ram’s son ran got kidnapped from home. He sent his
servant in search of the boy. When the servant had left,
Ram, by handbills, offered to pay Rs.500 to anybody
discovering the boy. The servant came to know of this
offer only when he had already traced the missing
child.He, however brought an action to recover the
reward.
Will he succeed in his attempt? Give reasons.
32. Solution
The servant will not succeed as the offer was not in the
knowledge of the servant when he found the child and
without offer there can’t be acceptance.
An offeree must have knowledge of the offer before he
can accept it.
33. Problem 15
A sees a rate book displayed in a shop.It is
labelled “First edition Rs.15.” A enters the
shop and puts Rs.15 on the counter and asks
for the book. The bookseller does not agree
to sell saying that the real price of the book
is Rs.50 and that it has been marked as Rs.15
by mistake. Is the bookseller bound to sell
the book for Rs.15?
34. Solution
No, the bookseller is not bound to sell the books as
mere expression of price doesn’t amount to an offer.
35. Problem 16
Mr. Bhagwati in conversation with Ms. Sodhi asks her
to buy a diamond necklace worth Rs.1,00,000 for
Rs.20,000 as he’s in dire need of money. Ms. Sodhi
doesn’t have the money to buy the same but Ms. Savita
who overheard the whole talk conveys her willingness
to Mr. Bhagwati that she wants to buy the necklace for
the said amount.
Can Ms. Savita force Mr. Bhagwati for entering
into a contract ?
36. Solution 16
No, Ms.Savita cannot force Ms. Bagwati to enter into
a contract because Ms. Bagwati didn’t float an offer
to her and hence there was no contract.
Acceptance cannot move from Ms. Savita’s side
unless Ms. Bagwati proposes an offer.