1) The document examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and CEO compensation. It finds that CEO compensation is negatively associated with CSR overall but this relationship depends on how CSR and compensation are measured.
2) When CSR and compensation are disaggregated into various components, certain dimensions of CSR like employee relations, environment, and diversity are positively related to compensation, while overall CSR is negatively related.
3) The relationship between CSR and compensation also depends on other factors like the strength of corporate governance, the financial crisis, and CEO gender, with the relationship generally weakening when these factors are considered.
Research Methods Assignment - The Relationship among board of director charac...Amany Hamza
This report attempts to critically analyse the research paper:
Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009) The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance, International Journal of Managerial, Finance, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2009 pp. 407-423
January 23rd, 2012
What Is CEO Talent Worth?
By Professor, David F. Larcker and Brian Tayan, Researcher, Corporate Governance Research Program, Stanford Graduate School of Business
January 24, 2012
The topic of executive compensation elicits strong emotions among corporate stakeholders and practitioners. On the one hand are those who believe that chief executive officers in the United States are overpaid. On the other hand are those who believe that CEOs are simply paid the going fair-market rate.
Much less effort, however, is put into determining whether total compensation is commensurate with the value of services rendered.
We examine the issue and explain how such a calculation might be performed. We ask:
* How much value creation should be attributable to the efforts of the CEO?
* What percentage of this value should be fairly offered as compensation?
* Can the board actually perform this calculation? If not, how does it make rational decisions about pay levels?
Read the attached Closer Look and let us know what you think!
Research Methods Assignment - The Relationship among board of director charac...Amany Hamza
This report attempts to critically analyse the research paper:
Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009) The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance, International Journal of Managerial, Finance, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2009 pp. 407-423
January 23rd, 2012
What Is CEO Talent Worth?
By Professor, David F. Larcker and Brian Tayan, Researcher, Corporate Governance Research Program, Stanford Graduate School of Business
January 24, 2012
The topic of executive compensation elicits strong emotions among corporate stakeholders and practitioners. On the one hand are those who believe that chief executive officers in the United States are overpaid. On the other hand are those who believe that CEOs are simply paid the going fair-market rate.
Much less effort, however, is put into determining whether total compensation is commensurate with the value of services rendered.
We examine the issue and explain how such a calculation might be performed. We ask:
* How much value creation should be attributable to the efforts of the CEO?
* What percentage of this value should be fairly offered as compensation?
* Can the board actually perform this calculation? If not, how does it make rational decisions about pay levels?
Read the attached Closer Look and let us know what you think!
Study to investigate the correlation between the operating performances of fi...Charm Rammandala
The purpose of this study to understand whether there is a correlation between the operating performance of a firm and its CEO’s compensation. Various scholars and journalists studied and reported in this area over the years with mixed results. Popular notion among general public is that regardless of the performance of the company, CEO’s pay and perks either remain same or increase. Another accusation is most of the mergers and acquisitions taken place to boost the pay of CEO’s rather than to increase the value of shareholder. Study will look in to the validity of these claims to determine whether there is a correlation between the firm performances and the CEO pay
Corporate Social and FinancialPerformance An Extended.docxrichardnorman90310
Corporate Social and Financial
Performance: An Extended
Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical
Test with Accounting Measures
Gerwin Van der Laan
Hans Van Ees
Arjen Van Witteloostuijn
ABSTRACT. Although agreement on the positive sign
of the relationship between corporate social and financial
performance is observed in the literature, the mechanisms
that constitute this relationship are not yet well-known.
We address this issue by extending management�s stake-
holder theory by adding insights from psychology�s
prospect decision theory and sociology�s resource
dependence theory. Empirically, we analyze an extensive
panel dataset, including information on disaggregated
measures of social performance for the S&P 500 in the
1997–2002 period. In so doing, we enrich the extant
literature by focusing on stakeholder heterogeneity, per-
ceptional framing, and disaggregated measures of corpo-
rate social performance.
KEY WORDS: panel data analysis, prospect decision
theory, resource dependence theory, social responsibility,
stakeholder theory
Introduction
Three decades of research into the relationship
between corporate social performance (CSP) and
corporate financial performance (CFP) suggest, by
and large, that corporate well-doing enhances firm
profitability (Orlitzky et al., 2003). The analyses
have remained at a fairly high level of aggregation,
giving rise to the criticism that overall measures of
CSP and CFP do not take the rich variety of
underlying determinants into account (Wood and
Jones, 1995). The current study aims to enhance the
understanding of the drivers of the relationship
between corporate social and financial performance.
For one, theoretically, we will develop hypotheses as
to the impact on the CSP–CFP relationship of
stakeholder heterogeneity and perception biases.
Additionally, empirically, we will explore an
extensive panel dataset that covers the corporations
in the S&P 500 over the 1997–2002 period,
including decomposed information about underly-
ing dimensions of corporate social performance.
More specifically, our key contribution is two-fold.
First, we analyze the effect of heterogeneity
among corporate stakeholder groups on the CSP–
CFP nexus, following Clarkson�s (1995) distinction
between primary or �private� stakeholders, and
secondary or �public� stakeholders. Wood and
Jones (1995) argued that there is a mismatch
between the variables in previous research. For
instance, employees and Greenpeace put different
emphasis on issues of labor conditions and envi-
ronmental pollution. With this critique in mind,
we explicitly incorporate more fine-grained mea-
sures of corporate social performance into our
analysis. After all, the question as to the relation-
ship between corporate social and financial per-
formance cannot be considered separate from the
analysis of how corporations interact with different
stakeholder groups that weigh the underlying CSP
dimensions differe.
This Research Spotlight provides a summary of the academic literature on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities including:
• The relation between ESG activities and firm value
• The impact of environmental and social engagements on firm performance
• The market reaction to ESG events
• The relation between ESG and agency problems
• The performance of socially responsible investment (SRI) funds
This Research Spotlight expands upon issues introduced in the Quick Guide “Investors and Activism”.
Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management ...ijtsrd
The relationship between corporate social responsibility CSR and earnings management EM is an extensive empirical study. However, the evidence on the nature of the relationship is unclear. A commonly defined reason for divergent and contradictory results is measurement issues. The purpose of this article is to evaluate alternative operation and measurement methods applied to the CSR and EM concepts in the empirical literature on CSR EM relationships. Our systematized appraisal was conducted over the last nine years from 2008 to 2016. This study has come to different observations. First, CSR measurement methods include sustainability indexes, content analyzes and single dimensional measurements, while EM measurement methods include discretionary accruals, discretionary loan loss provisions, real earnings management, abnormal earnings management, earnings persistence and earnings smoothing. In addition to the unique drawbacks of the approach, the subjectivity of the researcher and the selection anomalies that may influence the nature of the CSR EM relationships identified in the empirical literature. Finally, possible ways of overcoming these disadvantages are recommended. Mashiur Rahman | Sarah Chowdhury ""Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: A Systematic Review of Measurement Methods"" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-2 , February 2020,
URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd29987.pdf
Paper Url : https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/business-ethics-and-legal-issues/29987/relationship-between-corporate-social-responsibility-and-earnings-management-a-systematic-review-of-measurement-methods/mashiur-rahman
Driving Performance Through Enhanced Collaboration between HR and Finance.
Effective working relationships across functions — particularly HR and Finance — have traditionally eluded many organizations. A siloed approach won’t work in the future.
Corporate Governance a Balanced Scorecard approach with KPIs between BOD, Exe...Chris Rigatuso
This paper, from 2003, during my time at Oracle, was an early attempt to define metrics for inducing accountability between BOD, executives, and operating management of corporations. It's geared to large companies, but the lessons are broadly appreciable. It was published in CFO Reviews by Anderson Consulting, and other places. It predates the SOX Sarbanes Oxley laws that were a result of the Enron Scandal.
Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) and Firm PerformanceSherif Sidhom, MBA
Corporate social responsibility is a critical issue for most organizations and their top management. Corporate social responsibility is a focal point and has strategic impact on companies in all different industries.
To what extent Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Impact on Firm Performance?
We find that IPO firms with generously compensated CEOs and large pay disparities between the CEO and other top executives have lower failure rates and longer time to survive in subsequent periods following the offering. Economically, firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 75th percentile have a failure risk that is, on average, 11.56% (13.20%) lower than the failure risk of firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 25th percentile. The relationship between CEO pay and IPO survival is strengthened among firms with lower agency conflicts, whereas the link between pay gap and IPO survival is pronounced among firms with stronger internal promotion incentives. The results are robust to alternative specifications and additional sensitivity tests.
We find that IPO firms with generously compensated CEOs and large pay disparities between the CEO and other top executives have lower failure rates and longer time to survive in subsequent periods following the offering. Economically, firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 75th percentile have a failure risk that is, on average, 11.56% (13.20%) lower than the failure risk of firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 25th percentile. The relationship between CEO pay and IPO survival is strengthened among firms with lower agency conflicts, whereas the link between pay gap and IPO survival is pronounced among firms with stronger internal promotion incentives. The results are robust to alternative specifications and additional sensitivity tests.
Study to investigate the correlation between the operating performances of fi...Charm Rammandala
The purpose of this study to understand whether there is a correlation between the operating performance of a firm and its CEO’s compensation. Various scholars and journalists studied and reported in this area over the years with mixed results. Popular notion among general public is that regardless of the performance of the company, CEO’s pay and perks either remain same or increase. Another accusation is most of the mergers and acquisitions taken place to boost the pay of CEO’s rather than to increase the value of shareholder. Study will look in to the validity of these claims to determine whether there is a correlation between the firm performances and the CEO pay
Corporate Social and FinancialPerformance An Extended.docxrichardnorman90310
Corporate Social and Financial
Performance: An Extended
Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical
Test with Accounting Measures
Gerwin Van der Laan
Hans Van Ees
Arjen Van Witteloostuijn
ABSTRACT. Although agreement on the positive sign
of the relationship between corporate social and financial
performance is observed in the literature, the mechanisms
that constitute this relationship are not yet well-known.
We address this issue by extending management�s stake-
holder theory by adding insights from psychology�s
prospect decision theory and sociology�s resource
dependence theory. Empirically, we analyze an extensive
panel dataset, including information on disaggregated
measures of social performance for the S&P 500 in the
1997–2002 period. In so doing, we enrich the extant
literature by focusing on stakeholder heterogeneity, per-
ceptional framing, and disaggregated measures of corpo-
rate social performance.
KEY WORDS: panel data analysis, prospect decision
theory, resource dependence theory, social responsibility,
stakeholder theory
Introduction
Three decades of research into the relationship
between corporate social performance (CSP) and
corporate financial performance (CFP) suggest, by
and large, that corporate well-doing enhances firm
profitability (Orlitzky et al., 2003). The analyses
have remained at a fairly high level of aggregation,
giving rise to the criticism that overall measures of
CSP and CFP do not take the rich variety of
underlying determinants into account (Wood and
Jones, 1995). The current study aims to enhance the
understanding of the drivers of the relationship
between corporate social and financial performance.
For one, theoretically, we will develop hypotheses as
to the impact on the CSP–CFP relationship of
stakeholder heterogeneity and perception biases.
Additionally, empirically, we will explore an
extensive panel dataset that covers the corporations
in the S&P 500 over the 1997–2002 period,
including decomposed information about underly-
ing dimensions of corporate social performance.
More specifically, our key contribution is two-fold.
First, we analyze the effect of heterogeneity
among corporate stakeholder groups on the CSP–
CFP nexus, following Clarkson�s (1995) distinction
between primary or �private� stakeholders, and
secondary or �public� stakeholders. Wood and
Jones (1995) argued that there is a mismatch
between the variables in previous research. For
instance, employees and Greenpeace put different
emphasis on issues of labor conditions and envi-
ronmental pollution. With this critique in mind,
we explicitly incorporate more fine-grained mea-
sures of corporate social performance into our
analysis. After all, the question as to the relation-
ship between corporate social and financial per-
formance cannot be considered separate from the
analysis of how corporations interact with different
stakeholder groups that weigh the underlying CSP
dimensions differe.
This Research Spotlight provides a summary of the academic literature on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities including:
• The relation between ESG activities and firm value
• The impact of environmental and social engagements on firm performance
• The market reaction to ESG events
• The relation between ESG and agency problems
• The performance of socially responsible investment (SRI) funds
This Research Spotlight expands upon issues introduced in the Quick Guide “Investors and Activism”.
Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management ...ijtsrd
The relationship between corporate social responsibility CSR and earnings management EM is an extensive empirical study. However, the evidence on the nature of the relationship is unclear. A commonly defined reason for divergent and contradictory results is measurement issues. The purpose of this article is to evaluate alternative operation and measurement methods applied to the CSR and EM concepts in the empirical literature on CSR EM relationships. Our systematized appraisal was conducted over the last nine years from 2008 to 2016. This study has come to different observations. First, CSR measurement methods include sustainability indexes, content analyzes and single dimensional measurements, while EM measurement methods include discretionary accruals, discretionary loan loss provisions, real earnings management, abnormal earnings management, earnings persistence and earnings smoothing. In addition to the unique drawbacks of the approach, the subjectivity of the researcher and the selection anomalies that may influence the nature of the CSR EM relationships identified in the empirical literature. Finally, possible ways of overcoming these disadvantages are recommended. Mashiur Rahman | Sarah Chowdhury ""Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: A Systematic Review of Measurement Methods"" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-2 , February 2020,
URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd29987.pdf
Paper Url : https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/business-ethics-and-legal-issues/29987/relationship-between-corporate-social-responsibility-and-earnings-management-a-systematic-review-of-measurement-methods/mashiur-rahman
Driving Performance Through Enhanced Collaboration between HR and Finance.
Effective working relationships across functions — particularly HR and Finance — have traditionally eluded many organizations. A siloed approach won’t work in the future.
Corporate Governance a Balanced Scorecard approach with KPIs between BOD, Exe...Chris Rigatuso
This paper, from 2003, during my time at Oracle, was an early attempt to define metrics for inducing accountability between BOD, executives, and operating management of corporations. It's geared to large companies, but the lessons are broadly appreciable. It was published in CFO Reviews by Anderson Consulting, and other places. It predates the SOX Sarbanes Oxley laws that were a result of the Enron Scandal.
Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) and Firm PerformanceSherif Sidhom, MBA
Corporate social responsibility is a critical issue for most organizations and their top management. Corporate social responsibility is a focal point and has strategic impact on companies in all different industries.
To what extent Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Impact on Firm Performance?
We find that IPO firms with generously compensated CEOs and large pay disparities between the CEO and other top executives have lower failure rates and longer time to survive in subsequent periods following the offering. Economically, firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 75th percentile have a failure risk that is, on average, 11.56% (13.20%) lower than the failure risk of firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 25th percentile. The relationship between CEO pay and IPO survival is strengthened among firms with lower agency conflicts, whereas the link between pay gap and IPO survival is pronounced among firms with stronger internal promotion incentives. The results are robust to alternative specifications and additional sensitivity tests.
We find that IPO firms with generously compensated CEOs and large pay disparities between the CEO and other top executives have lower failure rates and longer time to survive in subsequent periods following the offering. Economically, firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 75th percentile have a failure risk that is, on average, 11.56% (13.20%) lower than the failure risk of firms with CEO pay (pay gaps) in the 25th percentile. The relationship between CEO pay and IPO survival is strengthened among firms with lower agency conflicts, whereas the link between pay gap and IPO survival is pronounced among firms with stronger internal promotion incentives. The results are robust to alternative specifications and additional sensitivity tests.
how to sell pi coins at high rate quickly.DOT TECH
Where can I sell my pi coins at a high rate.
Pi is not launched yet on any exchange. But one can easily sell his or her pi coins to investors who want to hold pi till mainnet launch.
This means crypto whales want to hold pi. And you can get a good rate for selling pi to them. I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi vendor below.
A vendor is someone who buys from a miner and resell it to a holder or crypto whale.
Here is the telegram contact of my vendor:
@Pi_vendor_247
what is the best method to sell pi coins in 2024DOT TECH
The best way to sell your pi coins safely is trading with an exchange..but since pi is not launched in any exchange, and second option is through a VERIFIED pi merchant.
Who is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and pioneers and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold massive amounts before mainnet launch in 2026.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade pi coins with.
@Pi_vendor_247
where can I find a legit pi merchant onlineDOT TECH
Yes. This is very easy what you need is a recommendation from someone who has successfully traded pi coins before with a merchant.
Who is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone who buys pi network coins and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold thousands of pi coins before the open mainnet.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with
@Pi_vendor_247
how to swap pi coins to foreign currency withdrawable.DOT TECH
As of my last update, Pi is still in the testing phase and is not tradable on any exchanges.
However, Pi Network has announced plans to launch its Testnet and Mainnet in the future, which may include listing Pi on exchanges.
The current method for selling pi coins involves exchanging them with a pi vendor who purchases pi coins for investment reasons.
If you want to sell your pi coins, reach out to a pi vendor and sell them to anyone looking to sell pi coins from any country around the globe.
Below is the contact information for my personal pi vendor.
Telegram: @Pi_vendor_247
Introduction to Indian Financial System ()Avanish Goel
The financial system of a country is an important tool for economic development of the country, as it helps in creation of wealth by linking savings with investments.
It facilitates the flow of funds form the households (savers) to business firms (investors) to aid in wealth creation and development of both the parties
Financial Assets: Debit vs Equity Securities.pptxWrito-Finance
financial assets represent claim for future benefit or cash. Financial assets are formed by establishing contracts between participants. These financial assets are used for collection of huge amounts of money for business purposes.
Two major Types: Debt Securities and Equity Securities.
Debt Securities are Also known as fixed-income securities or instruments. The type of assets is formed by establishing contracts between investor and issuer of the asset.
• The first type of Debit securities is BONDS. Bonds are issued by corporations and government (both local and national government).
• The second important type of Debit security is NOTES. Apart from similarities associated with notes and bonds, notes have shorter term maturity.
• The 3rd important type of Debit security is TRESURY BILLS. These securities have short-term ranging from three months, six months, and one year. Issuer of such securities are governments.
• Above discussed debit securities are mostly issued by governments and corporations. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS CDs are issued by Banks and Financial Institutions. Risk factor associated with CDs gets reduced when issued by reputable institutions or Banks.
Following are the risk attached with debt securities: Credit risk, interest rate risk and currency risk
There are no fixed maturity dates in such securities, and asset’s value is determined by company’s performance. There are two major types of equity securities: common stock and preferred stock.
Common Stock: These are simple equity securities and bear no complexities which the preferred stock bears. Holders of such securities or instrument have the voting rights when it comes to select the company’s board of director or the business decisions to be made.
Preferred Stock: Preferred stocks are sometime referred to as hybrid securities, because it contains elements of both debit security and equity security. Preferred stock confers ownership rights to security holder that is why it is equity instrument
<a href="https://www.writofinance.com/equity-securities-features-types-risk/" >Equity securities </a> as a whole is used for capital funding for companies. Companies have multiple expenses to cover. Potential growth of company is required in competitive market. So, these securities are used for capital generation, and then uses it for company’s growth.
Concluding remarks
Both are employed in business. Businesses are often established through debit securities, then what is the need for equity securities. Companies have to cover multiple expenses and expansion of business. They can also use equity instruments for repayment of debits. So, there are multiple uses for securities. As an investor, you need tools for analysis. Investment decisions are made by carefully analyzing the market. For better analysis of the stock market, investors often employ financial analysis of companies.
US Economic Outlook - Being Decided - M Capital Group August 2021.pdfpchutichetpong
The U.S. economy is continuing its impressive recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and not slowing down despite re-occurring bumps. The U.S. savings rate reached its highest ever recorded level at 34% in April 2020 and Americans seem ready to spend. The sectors that had been hurt the most by the pandemic specifically reduced consumer spending, like retail, leisure, hospitality, and travel, are now experiencing massive growth in revenue and job openings.
Could this growth lead to a “Roaring Twenties”? As quickly as the U.S. economy contracted, experiencing a 9.1% drop in economic output relative to the business cycle in Q2 2020, the largest in recorded history, it has rebounded beyond expectations. This surprising growth seems to be fueled by the U.S. government’s aggressive fiscal and monetary policies, and an increase in consumer spending as mobility restrictions are lifted. Unemployment rates between June 2020 and June 2021 decreased by 5.2%, while the demand for labor is increasing, coupled with increasing wages to incentivize Americans to rejoin the labor force. Schools and businesses are expected to fully reopen soon. In parallel, vaccination rates across the country and the world continue to rise, with full vaccination rates of 50% and 14.8% respectively.
However, it is not completely smooth sailing from here. According to M Capital Group, the main risks that threaten the continued growth of the U.S. economy are inflation, unsettled trade relations, and another wave of Covid-19 mutations that could shut down the world again. Have we learned from the past year of COVID-19 and adapted our economy accordingly?
“In order for the U.S. economy to continue growing, whether there is another wave or not, the U.S. needs to focus on diversifying supply chains, supporting business investment, and maintaining consumer spending,” says Grace Feeley, a research analyst at M Capital Group.
While the economic indicators are positive, the risks are coming closer to manifesting and threatening such growth. The new variants spreading throughout the world, Delta, Lambda, and Gamma, are vaccine-resistant and muddy the predictions made about the economy and health of the country. These variants bring back the feeling of uncertainty that has wreaked havoc not only on the stock market but the mindset of people around the world. MCG provides unique insight on how to mitigate these risks to possibly ensure a bright economic future.
how to sell pi coins in South Korea profitably.DOT TECH
Yes. You can sell your pi network coins in South Korea or any other country, by finding a verified pi merchant
What is a verified pi merchant?
Since pi network is not launched yet on any exchange, the only way you can sell pi coins is by selling to a verified pi merchant, and this is because pi network is not launched yet on any exchange and no pre-sale or ico offerings Is done on pi.
Since there is no pre-sale, the only way exchanges can get pi is by buying from miners. So a pi merchant facilitates these transactions by acting as a bridge for both transactions.
How can i find a pi vendor/merchant?
Well for those who haven't traded with a pi merchant or who don't already have one. I will leave the telegram id of my personal pi merchant who i trade pi with.
Tele gram: @Pi_vendor_247
#pi #sell #nigeria #pinetwork #picoins #sellpi #Nigerian #tradepi #pinetworkcoins #sellmypi
Turin Startup Ecosystem 2024 - Ricerca sulle Startup e il Sistema dell'Innov...Quotidiano Piemontese
Turin Startup Ecosystem 2024
Una ricerca de il Club degli Investitori, in collaborazione con ToTeM Torino Tech Map e con il supporto della ESCP Business School e di Growth Capital
Currently pi network is not tradable on binance or any other exchange because we are still in the enclosed mainnet.
Right now the only way to sell pi coins is by trading with a verified merchant.
What is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone verified by pi network team and allowed to barter pi coins for goods and services.
Since pi network is not doing any pre-sale The only way exchanges like binance/huobi or crypto whales can get pi is by buying from miners. And a merchant stands in between the exchanges and the miners.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant. I and my friends has traded more than 6000pi coins successfully
Tele-gram
@Pi_vendor_247
when will pi network coin be available on crypto exchange.DOT TECH
There is no set date for when Pi coins will enter the market.
However, the developers are working hard to get them released as soon as possible.
Once they are available, users will be able to exchange other cryptocurrencies for Pi coins on designated exchanges.
But for now the only way to sell your pi coins is through verified pi vendor.
Here is the telegram contact of my personal pi vendor
@Pi_vendor_247
how to sell pi coins effectively (from 50 - 100k pi)DOT TECH
Anywhere in the world, including Africa, America, and Europe, you can sell Pi Network Coins online and receive cash through online payment options.
Pi has not yet been launched on any exchange because we are currently using the confined Mainnet. The planned launch date for Pi is June 28, 2026.
Reselling to investors who want to hold until the mainnet launch in 2026 is currently the sole way to sell.
Consequently, right now. All you need to do is select the right pi network provider.
Who is a pi merchant?
An individual who buys coins from miners on the pi network and resells them to investors hoping to hang onto them until the mainnet is launched is known as a pi merchant.
debuts.
I'll provide you the Telegram username
@Pi_vendor_247
1. CASES STUDY IN CORPORATE FINANCE
Submitted to: Dr. Wasif
Present by: Mr. Adnan Khan
Program: MS Management Sciences
Session: 2022-24
Riphah International University, QIE, Lahore
2. TOPIC: Journal of Economics and
Business
• Corporate social responsibility and
CEO compensation revisited: Do
disaggregation, market stress, gender
matter?
3. A B S T R A C T
• In this paper we examine the relation between corporate social
responsibility (CSR) and CEO compensation. Both CSR and CEO
compensation are disaggregated into various sub-components. We
also consider impact of the market crisis and the relevance of
gender. Our results show that there is a negative relation between
total compensation and socially responsible firms. However,
disaggregation of CSR into its components matters. Dimensions of
CSR that are relevant are employee relations, environment and
diversity. Our results also show that the financial crisis and gender
matter: once they are accounted for interactively in the model, the
general relation between CSR and compensation weakens.
4. Definition of CSR and CEO Compensation
What Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?
• Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a self-regulating business model that helps a company
be socially accountable to itself, its stakeholders, and the public. By practicing corporate social
responsibility, also called corporate citizenship, companies can be conscious of the kind of
impact they are having on all aspects of society, including economic, social, and
environmental.
• To engage in CSR means that, in the ordinary course of business, a company is operating in
ways that enhance society and the environment instead of contributing negatively to them.
What Is CEO Compensation?
• It's hard to read the business news without coming across reports about the salaries, bonuses,
and stock option packages awarded to chief executives of publicly traded companies. Making
sense of the numbers to assess how companies are paying their top brass is not easy. Investors
must ensure that executive compensation is working in their favor.
5. Introduction
• In this paper we examine the link between corporate social responsibility
(CSR) and CEO compensation. CSR is measured using the rating system
from Kinder, Lindenberg, and Domini (KLD) Research and Analytics
database. It looks at whether firms are rated based on their environmental
activities, community involvement, product qualities, employee relations
and diversity policies.
CEO compensation is divided into various components:
• Salary, Bonus Cash and long-term compensation. The relation between
CSR and CEO compensation has been examined in the prior literature (see
for example Cai, Jo, & Pan, 2011). The main contribution lies in the
consideration of the impact of the recent financial crisis. Such a
decomposition of the key variables allows a more in-depth analysis of the
identified relations.
6. Introduction (Cont.)
• CSR is associated with investments in negative net present value projects
that destroy shareholders' value. Under the second view, managers may
over-invest in CSR that transfer wealth from shareholders to other
stakeholders (such as community, regulators and employees) This is
because managers have incentives to use CSR investment to build their
personal reputations.
• But these investments may reduce shareholders’ value in at least three
ways. First, managers’ career concerns might make them focus excessively
on short-term profit and distort their investment decisions, such as myopic
CSR investment (Narayanan, 1985) and overinvestment (Holmstrom and
Costa, 1986). For example, managers often overinvest in CSR for private
rent-seeking benefits to secure their personal reputations in the community,
enhance their personal status with stakeholders,
7. Introduction (Cont.)
• It is important to distinguish normal CSR and
abnormal CSR for at least two reasons. First, Larcker
(2003) argues that although firms continuously strive
to optimize their corporate financial policies, it is
plausible that firm policies and managerial decisions
deviate from the optimal levels
8. 2. Data and research design
Sample formation:
• We obtain CSR data from the Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini
(KLD) Database. We drop the following observations in the
screening procedures to obtain our sample:(1) observations
with CEO turnover during the year; (2) observations in which
the current CEO has served the company for strictly less than
two consecutive years; (3) firms in the regulated industries
(SIC code 4900–4999) or in the financial industry (SIC code
6000–6999); and (4) observations with zero CEO
compensation in the year. Table 1 describes the sample
distribution over years.
9. 3. Results
• 3.1. Descriptive statistics
• presents the descriptive statistics. Mean(median) CEO total
compensations $5.552($3.329) million. Mean CSR is 0.280.
On average, the sample firms are profitable with a mean return
on assets (ROA) of 0. 106. Mean board independence
(BDINDEP) is 68%. Mean percentage of common stock
owned by the board of directors (BDOWN) is 4%.
• Mean percentage of common stock owned by the institutional
shareholders is 63%
10. 3.3. Determinants of CSR
Table 5 presents the regression results of the determinants of CSR based on Eq. We
conduct a number of robustness checks on the model. Results are qualitatively
consistent with prior studies. CSR is positively associated with operating cash flow,
firm size and research and development divided by sales. It is negatively associated
with corporate governance strength.
In column (1) we include all firm characteristics in addition to industry and year fixed
effects. In column (2), we include all firm characteristics, the corporate governance
measures as well as industry and year fixed effects. On the other hand, CSR is
negatively associated with corporate governance strength. In our next set of tests, we
use the fitted values of CSR based on estimated coefficients in Table 5 column (1) to
compute the normal CSR (optimal level of CSR based on firm characteristics).
11. 3.4. Regressions of CEO compensation on
normal CSR and abnormal CSR
• In Table 6, we examine whether there are systematic differences
between normal CSR and abnormal CSR in affecting CEO
compensation. In all specifications we find similar results. However,
CEO compensation is punished for excessive CSR investments
when CSR investment deviates from its optimal level. This result
suggests that CEO is rewarded for investing in optimal level of CSR.
• First, we find CEO compensation level is positively associated with
normal CSR at the 1% significance level. To the extent that normal
CSR reflects the optimal level of CSR investment, this result
suggests that CEO is rewarded for investing in optimal level of CSR.
Second, we find CEO compensation level is negatively associated
with abnormal CSR at the 1% significance level.
12. 3.5. Does corporate governance affect the
association between CEO compensation and
CSR?
• In Table 7, we examine the effect of corporate governance on the association
between CEO compensation and CSR investment. In firms with strong
corporate governance, we find that CEO compensation is negatively associated
with CSR. However, in firms with weak corporate governance (column (2) and
(3) we find no such association. The Chi-square to test the difference in
coefficient on CSR between strongly-governed firms and weakly
governmentally firms is 6.85, significant at 1% level. This result suggests that
CEOs' pay is lower when total CSR is higher.
• Higher scores of GOVSTRENGTH denote higher corporate governance
strength. In firms with strong corporate governance (column (1)), we find that
CEO compensation is negatively associated with CSR. However, in firms with
weak corporate governance (column (2)), we find that CEO compensation is not
associated with CSR.
13. 3.6. Robustness tests
• 3. 6. 1. Alternative measures of CSR:
• In a sensitivity test, as in McWilliams and Siegel (2000), we also use
an alternative measure of CSR, CSR DSI400, an indicator variable
that takes a value of 1 if the firm is included in the DSI400 in a
given year (for having passed the “social screen”), and 0 otherwise.
• In order to be eligible for the DSI 400, a firm must derive less than
2% of its gross revenue from the production of military weapons,
have no involvement in nuclear power, gambling, tobacco, and
alcohol, and have a positive record in each of the remaining six
categories. Our results are qualitatively similar
14. 3.6. Robustness tests (Cont.)
3.6.2. Financial constraints:
• Our main results on the association between CEO
compensation and CSR are robust across alternative
measures of “financial constraints. ” In addition, the
results are qualitatively similar based on a balanced
panel of firms for the sample period.
15. 3.6. Robustness tests (Cont.)
3.6.3. Endogeneity:
• To address the potential endogeneity problem, we perform two-
stage-least-squares (2SLS) regression analysis using religion rank
and a blue state dummy as instrumental variables for the CSR
investment (Deng et al. , 2013). This finding suggests that the
religion rank variable is likely to be positively correlated with a
firm`s CSR, thus satisfying the relevance requirement of
instrumental variables. However, to the extent that the construction
of the religion rank variable is based on the state in which a firm is
located, it is unlikely that this variable has a significant effect on the
CEO compensation, satisfying the exclusion condition of
instrumental variables.
16. 4. Conclusions
• We examine whether CEO compensation is associated
with corporate social responsibility (CSR) investment.
The value creation (value destruction) hypothesis predicts
a positive (negative) association between CEO
compensation and CSR. Consistent with the value
destruction hypothesis, we find that CEO total
compensation level is negatively associated with CSR
investment. Strong corporate governance is more
pronounced than weak corporate governance in this study.
17. 4. Conclusions (Cont.)
• Decomposing total CSR investment into a normal
component and abnormal component generates two
interesting insights. We find CEO compensation is
positively associated with normal corporate social
responsibility. Strong corporate governance structure
penalizes CEO more by reducing CEO compensation if
CEOs over-invest in CSR. This result suggests that CEOs
receive lower compensation for excessive CSR
investments.