Given at the Citizen Science Association Conference, 18th May 2017, on the DITOs logic model for the general public: how depth and breadth of citizen science participation can be increased
Citizen Science Training Day: Working with Citizen ScientistsAlice Sheppard
This document summarizes a training day on citizen science. It discusses building community among volunteers by providing a job to do, data to analyze, and a discussion forum. It emphasizes moderating the forum to resolve conflicts and keep discussions civil. The document also addresses vulnerabilities volunteers may have and provides tips on improving inclusiveness through accommodations, praise, and addressing problems sensitively. Case studies demonstrate how to handle arguments in forums or lack of communication between volunteers and scientists. The key message is that volunteers should feel appreciated and have a place to discuss their work.
Citizen science projects can be categorized in different ways based on levels of public participation and types of scientific tasks involved. Some key typologies include contributory vs collaborative vs co-created projects, and projects involving data collection, processing, and transcription tasks. The level of public participation and task complexity determine scalability, technology requirements, volunteer management needs, and implications for project design such as evaluating resources and goals, recognizing tradeoffs, and addressing constraints to determine the appropriate design.
Free as in Puppies: Compensating for ICT Constraints in Citizen ScienceAndrea Wiggins
This document discusses how citizen science project organizers address issues related to participation and data quality when limited by resource constraints. It notes that while ideal information and communication technologies (ICT) could help with recruitment, retention, and data quality, free ICT options are often not sufficient due to lack of funding. The document presents three citizen science projects that have contrasting resource levels and explores how they creatively address these issues through alternative solutions like in-person outreach, paper data collection, and process optimization. It concludes by discussing implications for practice, policy, and CSCW research around leveraging complementary resources when full ICT capabilities are not possible.
Into the Night - Citizen Science Training day - introduction to citizen scienceMuki Haklay
This document provides an introduction to environmental citizen science projects. It discusses different types of citizen science, including contributory projects where the public contributes data designed by scientists, collaborative projects where the public helps design the project, and co-created projects designed by scientists and the public together. The document outlines considerations for setting up a citizen science project, such as balancing goals of increasing awareness, collecting data, and education. It also discusses recruiting and retaining participants, as well as evaluating projects for their scientific and societal impacts.
This document discusses citizen science and distributed computation. It provides examples of citizen science projects that involve volunteers collecting and reporting environmental data to help scientists study changes over broad areas and long periods. These projects employ distributed systems to facilitate communication between scientists and volunteers and to share and analyze the collected data. The document emphasizes that citizen science can further scientific understanding while also promoting science literacy among the public.
Haw GIScience lost its interdisciplinary mojo?Muki Haklay
These are the slides from my talk at the GISCience 2016 conference. There is more information on my blog, but the abstract is:
Over the past 25 years, I have experienced an inside track view of two interdisciplinary research fields: Geographical Information Science (GIScience) and Citizen Science. Over that period, I was also involved in about 20 multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary projects. As a result, I also found myself evaluating and funding x-disciplinary projects.
On the basis of these experiences, I’d argue that Interdisciplinarity is always hard, risky, require compromises, accommodations, listening, and making mistakes. The excitement from the outputs and outcomes does not always justify the price. Frequently, there is no-follow on project – it’s been too exhausting.
Considering the project level challenges, viewing interdisciplinary areas of studies emerging is especially interesting. You can notice how concepts are being argued and agreed on. You can see what is inside and what is outside, and where the boundary is drawn. You can see how methodologies, jargon, acceptable behaviour, and modes of operations get accepted or rejected – and from the inside, you can nudge the field and sometimes see the impact of your actions.
GIScience was born as an interdisciplinary field of study, and the period of consolidation that I have seen was supposed to lead to stability and growth. This did not happen. Take any measure that you like: size of conferences, papers – or even the argument if the field deserve a Wikipedia page. Something didn’t work.
In contrast, Citizen Science is already attracting to its conferences audience in the many hundreds – the Citizen Science Association include 4000 (free) members, The European Citizen Science Association 180 (paid) – and that is in the first 2 years since they’ve established.
In the talk, I explore the way in which interdisciplinary projects and fields work, highlight the similarities and differences, and suggest the issues that have led to the outcomes that we see today
Citizen Science Training Day: Working with Citizen ScientistsAlice Sheppard
This document summarizes a training day on citizen science. It discusses building community among volunteers by providing a job to do, data to analyze, and a discussion forum. It emphasizes moderating the forum to resolve conflicts and keep discussions civil. The document also addresses vulnerabilities volunteers may have and provides tips on improving inclusiveness through accommodations, praise, and addressing problems sensitively. Case studies demonstrate how to handle arguments in forums or lack of communication between volunteers and scientists. The key message is that volunteers should feel appreciated and have a place to discuss their work.
Citizen science projects can be categorized in different ways based on levels of public participation and types of scientific tasks involved. Some key typologies include contributory vs collaborative vs co-created projects, and projects involving data collection, processing, and transcription tasks. The level of public participation and task complexity determine scalability, technology requirements, volunteer management needs, and implications for project design such as evaluating resources and goals, recognizing tradeoffs, and addressing constraints to determine the appropriate design.
Free as in Puppies: Compensating for ICT Constraints in Citizen ScienceAndrea Wiggins
This document discusses how citizen science project organizers address issues related to participation and data quality when limited by resource constraints. It notes that while ideal information and communication technologies (ICT) could help with recruitment, retention, and data quality, free ICT options are often not sufficient due to lack of funding. The document presents three citizen science projects that have contrasting resource levels and explores how they creatively address these issues through alternative solutions like in-person outreach, paper data collection, and process optimization. It concludes by discussing implications for practice, policy, and CSCW research around leveraging complementary resources when full ICT capabilities are not possible.
Into the Night - Citizen Science Training day - introduction to citizen scienceMuki Haklay
This document provides an introduction to environmental citizen science projects. It discusses different types of citizen science, including contributory projects where the public contributes data designed by scientists, collaborative projects where the public helps design the project, and co-created projects designed by scientists and the public together. The document outlines considerations for setting up a citizen science project, such as balancing goals of increasing awareness, collecting data, and education. It also discusses recruiting and retaining participants, as well as evaluating projects for their scientific and societal impacts.
This document discusses citizen science and distributed computation. It provides examples of citizen science projects that involve volunteers collecting and reporting environmental data to help scientists study changes over broad areas and long periods. These projects employ distributed systems to facilitate communication between scientists and volunteers and to share and analyze the collected data. The document emphasizes that citizen science can further scientific understanding while also promoting science literacy among the public.
Haw GIScience lost its interdisciplinary mojo?Muki Haklay
These are the slides from my talk at the GISCience 2016 conference. There is more information on my blog, but the abstract is:
Over the past 25 years, I have experienced an inside track view of two interdisciplinary research fields: Geographical Information Science (GIScience) and Citizen Science. Over that period, I was also involved in about 20 multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary projects. As a result, I also found myself evaluating and funding x-disciplinary projects.
On the basis of these experiences, I’d argue that Interdisciplinarity is always hard, risky, require compromises, accommodations, listening, and making mistakes. The excitement from the outputs and outcomes does not always justify the price. Frequently, there is no-follow on project – it’s been too exhausting.
Considering the project level challenges, viewing interdisciplinary areas of studies emerging is especially interesting. You can notice how concepts are being argued and agreed on. You can see what is inside and what is outside, and where the boundary is drawn. You can see how methodologies, jargon, acceptable behaviour, and modes of operations get accepted or rejected – and from the inside, you can nudge the field and sometimes see the impact of your actions.
GIScience was born as an interdisciplinary field of study, and the period of consolidation that I have seen was supposed to lead to stability and growth. This did not happen. Take any measure that you like: size of conferences, papers – or even the argument if the field deserve a Wikipedia page. Something didn’t work.
In contrast, Citizen Science is already attracting to its conferences audience in the many hundreds – the Citizen Science Association include 4000 (free) members, The European Citizen Science Association 180 (paid) – and that is in the first 2 years since they’ve established.
In the talk, I explore the way in which interdisciplinary projects and fields work, highlight the similarities and differences, and suggest the issues that have led to the outcomes that we see today
The talk will cover the concepts behing COST Action IC1203 - a European Network Exploring Research into Geospatial Information Crowdsourcing: software and methodologies for harnessing geographic information from the crowd (ENERGIC). The network emerged from the realisation that new and unprecedented sources of geographic information have recently become available in the form of user-generated Web content. The integration and application of these sources, often termed volunteered geographic information (VGI), offers multidisciplinary scientists an unprecedented opportunity to conduct research on a variety of topics at multiple spatial and temporal scales. The Action targets fundamental scientific and technological advances by establishing a European network of excellence on Geoweb technologies. The Action focus on VGI and gather efforts carried out in an innovative and under-exploited field of Web research and knowledge production.
In the talk special attention will be paid to the differences between OSM, VGI and Citizen Science, and suggesting 'code of engagement' with OpenStreetMap that are relevant to many other volunteering projects
The role of learning in citizen scienceMuki Haklay
This is a presentation from the citizen science impact event at the Open University http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/opentel/citizen-science-impact-event-at-the-open-university/
Citizen science offer different levels of engagement to participants, which have been captured in typologies of the field (contributory, collaborative, co-created, collegial / crowdsourcing, distributed intelligence, participatory science, extreme citizen science). These typologies do no explicitly examine learning. At the same time, projects and activities striving to fulfil multiple goals (excellent scientific output, satisfying engagement, good recruitment, learning …). Within ythe range of citizen science project, we can consider different aspects of learning that are occurring in them, Projects and use examples from a range of project, and raise some aspects that can help those who are designing co-created projects.
Slides from my talk in the European Citizen Science Conference in Berlin, May 2016. The talk look at issues of participation, citizen science and open science, and a bit about implications. It's about participation inequality and educational attainment of participants
What is Extreme Citizen Science? Volunteerism & Publicly Initiated Scientific...Cindy Regalado
This presentation briefly illustrates the state of citizen science our approach in Extreme Citizen Science. We present two examples under this research group at University College London: Publicly Initiated Scientific Research and the Socio-demographics of Volunteerism
ECSA, the ECSA principles, and the ECSA Characteristics of Citizen ScienceMargaret Gold
The European Citizen Science Association aims to connect citizens and science through fostering active participation. Its mission is to encourage the growth of citizen science in Europe by mobilizing citizens to contribute to evidence-based sustainable development through citizen science projects. The association supports citizen science projects, interactions between groups and disciplines, and the participation of the general public. It also performs research on citizen science and shares best practices. Some focus areas of the association include projects, data, tools and technology; policy, strategy, governance and partnerships; learning and education; air quality; open science; bio blitzes; and global mosquito alert.
A whirlwind tour of Citizen Science in AstronomyMargaret Gold
Citizen science involves laypeople actively contributing to scientific projects and research. It has grown significantly due to connecting technologies and peer production. Citizen science provides benefits like scaling up data collection and allowing for serendipitous discoveries. It also impacts society, science, governance, and the environment. Citizen science is an important part of open science and has wide-ranging and valuable outcomes.
Extreme Citizen Science: Current Development Muki Haklay
Slides from a talk to UCL Institute of Global Prosperity soundbites event - 5th November 2015.
With a growing emphasis on civil society-led change in diverse disciplines, from International Development to Town Planning, there is an increasing demand to understand how institutions might work with the public effectively and fairly.
Extreme Citizen Science is a situated, bottom-up practice that takes into account local needs, practices and culture and works with broad networks of people to design and build new devices and knowledge creation processes that can transform the world.
In this talk, Muki will discuss the work of UCL Extreme Citizen Science group within the wider context of the developments in the field of citizen science.He will cover the work that ExCiteS has already done, currently developing and plans for the future.
https://www.igp.ucl.ac.uk/igp-events-pub/muki-haklay-extreme-citizen-science
Citizen Science & Geographical Technologies: creativity, learning, and engage...Muki Haklay
These slides are from a keynote talk at the Esri Education User Conference in 2016, about citizen science and extreme citizen science, and their link to geographical technologies
Kicking off the INCENTIVE project with an intro to the CS Principles and Char...Margaret Gold
-The Citizen Science Lab at Leiden University
- The core concept of the INCENTIVE project
- The ECSA 10 Principles of Citizen Science
- The ECSA Characteristics of Citizen Science
This document discusses the responsible use of data science techniques and technologies. It describes data science as answering questions using large, noisy, and heterogeneous datasets that were collected for unrelated purposes. It raises concerns about the irresponsible use of data science, such as algorithms amplifying biases in data. The work of the DataLab group at the University of Washington is presented, which aims to address these issues by developing techniques to balance predictive accuracy with fairness, increase data sharing while protecting privacy, and ensure transparency in datasets and methods.
Citizen science - theory, practice & policy workshopMuki Haklay
The document provides an overview of a presentation on citizen science, including:
- A history of citizen science from early informal involvement to the modern era facilitated by increased education, technology, and societal trends.
- Examples of different types of citizen science including passive sensing, volunteer computing/thinking, long-running projects in ecology/astronomy, DIY and community science, and participatory sensing.
- Guidance on designing citizen science projects including considerations for participant engagement, learning outcomes, and project structure based on participant skills and abilities.
- An agenda for the presentation covering these topics as well as hands-on data collection, implications for project design, and policy aspects of citizen science.
Overview of Citizen Science - Zurich November 2015Muki Haklay
Citizen science has grown significantly due to societal and technological trends. Increased education levels, leisure time, and sharing economies have empowered more people to engage in scientific work. Advances like broadband internet, mobile devices, and DIY electronics have also facilitated participation. Current citizen science involves collaborative problem definition and data collection between citizens and scientists. Government agencies and policies are increasingly recognizing the value of citizen science data. Further development is still needed regarding sustainable funding models, data standards, and expanding citizen science to new domains.
Examining the values that are embedded in the processes and technologies of p...Muki Haklay
A persistent question about participatory methodologies that rely on technologies, such as public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS), is how to integrate values, such as inclusiveness of all the people that are impacted by a decision, or identifying options that are popular by the majority but acceptable to the minority, within technologically focused projects. Moreover, technologies do not operate by themselves – they are embedded in organizational, political, and social processes that set how they are used, who can use them, and in what context. Therefore, we should explore where the values reside?
Two factors obscure our view: The misleading conceptualisation that technologies are value free, and can be used for good or for bad – which put all the weight on the process, and ignores the way in which any technology allow only certain actions to be taken. Another popular view of technology conceptualisation is to emphasise their advantages (upside) and ignore their limitations. If we move beyond these, and other “common sense” views of technologies, we can notice how process and technology intertwine.
We can therefore look at the way the process/technology reinforce and limit each other, and the way that the values are integrated and influence them. With this analysis, we can also consider how technological development can explicitly include considerations of values, and be philosophically, politically, and social-theory informed. We need to consider the roles, skills, and knowledge of the people that are involved in each part of the process – from community facilitation to software development.
The paper will draw on the experience of developing participatory geographic information technologies over the past 20 years, and will suggest future directions for values-based participatory technology development.
Paper from the Programmable City workshop data and the city. See more details on my blog at http://wp.me/p7DNf-sX for description of the workshop. The paper explores the link between citizen science and philosophy of technology
#FuturePub - Citizen Science, Open Science & scientific publicationsMuki Haklay
Slides from a short talk at the #FuturePub 7 event, London, 10 May 2016. Covering a bit of background of citizen science, explaining the link to open science, and issues of scientific publishing that emerge from these interactions
Extreme Citizen Science: the socio-political potential of citizen scienceMuki Haklay
Slides from a talk at the International Congress for Conservation Biology / European Congress for Conservation Biology 2015 (Montpellier 2-6 August). The talk positioned citizen science within the wider context of production and use of environmental information, and emphasised the need to extend citizen science to a wider audience. It also demonstrated how technology can be used within a careful participatory process.
Eye on Earth Summit - Data Revolution plenary Muki Haklay
The presentation explores the place for extreme citizen science within the landscape of citizen science in general. The first half looks at the history of citizen science and highlights the education transition that happened while citizen science evolved , while the second half explains what is extreme citizen science and the roles of the technological tools that have been developed within the ExCiteS group, with an open invitation for others to join the effort.
Into the Night - Technology for citizen scienceMuki Haklay
Current citizen science seems effortless...just download an app and start using it. However, there are many technical aspects that are necessary to make a citizen science project work. In this session, we will provide an overview of all the technical elements that are required - from the process of designing an app., to designing and managing a back-end system, to testing the system end to end before deployment. Participants will have the opportunity to engage in a short exercise to consider the design of an app for a citizen science project that addresses light pollution.
This is a citizen science overview particularly aimed at graduate students enrolled in a new course at Arizona State University, aptly titled "Citizen Science." The author of this presentation, and course instructor, Darlene Cavalier, will talk students through its nuances and intersections with science, technology, and society.
Pecha Kucha session: multi country science programs Ecsite 2018Muki Haklay
Doing It Together Science (DITOs) is a 3-year project, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme, that is aimed to increase awareness of and participation in citizen science across Europe and beyond. It is focused on communication, coordination, and support of citizen science activities. Therefore, the project promotes the sharing of best practices among existing networks for a greater public and policy engagement with citizen science through a wide range of events and activities.
This document discusses citizen science projects across different domains and levels of participation. It provides an overview of citizen science activities and the relationship between scientists and the public. It also positions citizen science within the context of public engagement, using an example from the DITOs project. Finally, it introduces the next step of the EU-Citizen.Science project.
The talk will cover the concepts behing COST Action IC1203 - a European Network Exploring Research into Geospatial Information Crowdsourcing: software and methodologies for harnessing geographic information from the crowd (ENERGIC). The network emerged from the realisation that new and unprecedented sources of geographic information have recently become available in the form of user-generated Web content. The integration and application of these sources, often termed volunteered geographic information (VGI), offers multidisciplinary scientists an unprecedented opportunity to conduct research on a variety of topics at multiple spatial and temporal scales. The Action targets fundamental scientific and technological advances by establishing a European network of excellence on Geoweb technologies. The Action focus on VGI and gather efforts carried out in an innovative and under-exploited field of Web research and knowledge production.
In the talk special attention will be paid to the differences between OSM, VGI and Citizen Science, and suggesting 'code of engagement' with OpenStreetMap that are relevant to many other volunteering projects
The role of learning in citizen scienceMuki Haklay
This is a presentation from the citizen science impact event at the Open University http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/opentel/citizen-science-impact-event-at-the-open-university/
Citizen science offer different levels of engagement to participants, which have been captured in typologies of the field (contributory, collaborative, co-created, collegial / crowdsourcing, distributed intelligence, participatory science, extreme citizen science). These typologies do no explicitly examine learning. At the same time, projects and activities striving to fulfil multiple goals (excellent scientific output, satisfying engagement, good recruitment, learning …). Within ythe range of citizen science project, we can consider different aspects of learning that are occurring in them, Projects and use examples from a range of project, and raise some aspects that can help those who are designing co-created projects.
Slides from my talk in the European Citizen Science Conference in Berlin, May 2016. The talk look at issues of participation, citizen science and open science, and a bit about implications. It's about participation inequality and educational attainment of participants
What is Extreme Citizen Science? Volunteerism & Publicly Initiated Scientific...Cindy Regalado
This presentation briefly illustrates the state of citizen science our approach in Extreme Citizen Science. We present two examples under this research group at University College London: Publicly Initiated Scientific Research and the Socio-demographics of Volunteerism
ECSA, the ECSA principles, and the ECSA Characteristics of Citizen ScienceMargaret Gold
The European Citizen Science Association aims to connect citizens and science through fostering active participation. Its mission is to encourage the growth of citizen science in Europe by mobilizing citizens to contribute to evidence-based sustainable development through citizen science projects. The association supports citizen science projects, interactions between groups and disciplines, and the participation of the general public. It also performs research on citizen science and shares best practices. Some focus areas of the association include projects, data, tools and technology; policy, strategy, governance and partnerships; learning and education; air quality; open science; bio blitzes; and global mosquito alert.
A whirlwind tour of Citizen Science in AstronomyMargaret Gold
Citizen science involves laypeople actively contributing to scientific projects and research. It has grown significantly due to connecting technologies and peer production. Citizen science provides benefits like scaling up data collection and allowing for serendipitous discoveries. It also impacts society, science, governance, and the environment. Citizen science is an important part of open science and has wide-ranging and valuable outcomes.
Extreme Citizen Science: Current Development Muki Haklay
Slides from a talk to UCL Institute of Global Prosperity soundbites event - 5th November 2015.
With a growing emphasis on civil society-led change in diverse disciplines, from International Development to Town Planning, there is an increasing demand to understand how institutions might work with the public effectively and fairly.
Extreme Citizen Science is a situated, bottom-up practice that takes into account local needs, practices and culture and works with broad networks of people to design and build new devices and knowledge creation processes that can transform the world.
In this talk, Muki will discuss the work of UCL Extreme Citizen Science group within the wider context of the developments in the field of citizen science.He will cover the work that ExCiteS has already done, currently developing and plans for the future.
https://www.igp.ucl.ac.uk/igp-events-pub/muki-haklay-extreme-citizen-science
Citizen Science & Geographical Technologies: creativity, learning, and engage...Muki Haklay
These slides are from a keynote talk at the Esri Education User Conference in 2016, about citizen science and extreme citizen science, and their link to geographical technologies
Kicking off the INCENTIVE project with an intro to the CS Principles and Char...Margaret Gold
-The Citizen Science Lab at Leiden University
- The core concept of the INCENTIVE project
- The ECSA 10 Principles of Citizen Science
- The ECSA Characteristics of Citizen Science
This document discusses the responsible use of data science techniques and technologies. It describes data science as answering questions using large, noisy, and heterogeneous datasets that were collected for unrelated purposes. It raises concerns about the irresponsible use of data science, such as algorithms amplifying biases in data. The work of the DataLab group at the University of Washington is presented, which aims to address these issues by developing techniques to balance predictive accuracy with fairness, increase data sharing while protecting privacy, and ensure transparency in datasets and methods.
Citizen science - theory, practice & policy workshopMuki Haklay
The document provides an overview of a presentation on citizen science, including:
- A history of citizen science from early informal involvement to the modern era facilitated by increased education, technology, and societal trends.
- Examples of different types of citizen science including passive sensing, volunteer computing/thinking, long-running projects in ecology/astronomy, DIY and community science, and participatory sensing.
- Guidance on designing citizen science projects including considerations for participant engagement, learning outcomes, and project structure based on participant skills and abilities.
- An agenda for the presentation covering these topics as well as hands-on data collection, implications for project design, and policy aspects of citizen science.
Overview of Citizen Science - Zurich November 2015Muki Haklay
Citizen science has grown significantly due to societal and technological trends. Increased education levels, leisure time, and sharing economies have empowered more people to engage in scientific work. Advances like broadband internet, mobile devices, and DIY electronics have also facilitated participation. Current citizen science involves collaborative problem definition and data collection between citizens and scientists. Government agencies and policies are increasingly recognizing the value of citizen science data. Further development is still needed regarding sustainable funding models, data standards, and expanding citizen science to new domains.
Examining the values that are embedded in the processes and technologies of p...Muki Haklay
A persistent question about participatory methodologies that rely on technologies, such as public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS), is how to integrate values, such as inclusiveness of all the people that are impacted by a decision, or identifying options that are popular by the majority but acceptable to the minority, within technologically focused projects. Moreover, technologies do not operate by themselves – they are embedded in organizational, political, and social processes that set how they are used, who can use them, and in what context. Therefore, we should explore where the values reside?
Two factors obscure our view: The misleading conceptualisation that technologies are value free, and can be used for good or for bad – which put all the weight on the process, and ignores the way in which any technology allow only certain actions to be taken. Another popular view of technology conceptualisation is to emphasise their advantages (upside) and ignore their limitations. If we move beyond these, and other “common sense” views of technologies, we can notice how process and technology intertwine.
We can therefore look at the way the process/technology reinforce and limit each other, and the way that the values are integrated and influence them. With this analysis, we can also consider how technological development can explicitly include considerations of values, and be philosophically, politically, and social-theory informed. We need to consider the roles, skills, and knowledge of the people that are involved in each part of the process – from community facilitation to software development.
The paper will draw on the experience of developing participatory geographic information technologies over the past 20 years, and will suggest future directions for values-based participatory technology development.
Paper from the Programmable City workshop data and the city. See more details on my blog at http://wp.me/p7DNf-sX for description of the workshop. The paper explores the link between citizen science and philosophy of technology
#FuturePub - Citizen Science, Open Science & scientific publicationsMuki Haklay
Slides from a short talk at the #FuturePub 7 event, London, 10 May 2016. Covering a bit of background of citizen science, explaining the link to open science, and issues of scientific publishing that emerge from these interactions
Extreme Citizen Science: the socio-political potential of citizen scienceMuki Haklay
Slides from a talk at the International Congress for Conservation Biology / European Congress for Conservation Biology 2015 (Montpellier 2-6 August). The talk positioned citizen science within the wider context of production and use of environmental information, and emphasised the need to extend citizen science to a wider audience. It also demonstrated how technology can be used within a careful participatory process.
Eye on Earth Summit - Data Revolution plenary Muki Haklay
The presentation explores the place for extreme citizen science within the landscape of citizen science in general. The first half looks at the history of citizen science and highlights the education transition that happened while citizen science evolved , while the second half explains what is extreme citizen science and the roles of the technological tools that have been developed within the ExCiteS group, with an open invitation for others to join the effort.
Into the Night - Technology for citizen scienceMuki Haklay
Current citizen science seems effortless...just download an app and start using it. However, there are many technical aspects that are necessary to make a citizen science project work. In this session, we will provide an overview of all the technical elements that are required - from the process of designing an app., to designing and managing a back-end system, to testing the system end to end before deployment. Participants will have the opportunity to engage in a short exercise to consider the design of an app for a citizen science project that addresses light pollution.
This is a citizen science overview particularly aimed at graduate students enrolled in a new course at Arizona State University, aptly titled "Citizen Science." The author of this presentation, and course instructor, Darlene Cavalier, will talk students through its nuances and intersections with science, technology, and society.
Pecha Kucha session: multi country science programs Ecsite 2018Muki Haklay
Doing It Together Science (DITOs) is a 3-year project, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme, that is aimed to increase awareness of and participation in citizen science across Europe and beyond. It is focused on communication, coordination, and support of citizen science activities. Therefore, the project promotes the sharing of best practices among existing networks for a greater public and policy engagement with citizen science through a wide range of events and activities.
This document discusses citizen science projects across different domains and levels of participation. It provides an overview of citizen science activities and the relationship between scientists and the public. It also positions citizen science within the context of public engagement, using an example from the DITOs project. Finally, it introduces the next step of the EU-Citizen.Science project.
Presentation at the Open Knowledge Festival: Open Research and Education Stream, 20 September 2012, Helsinki; also
Presentation at the DINI-Jahrestagung - Bausteine für Open Science, 24 September 2012, Karlsruhe;
also Belgian Open Access Week: Open Access to Excellence in Research, 22 October 2012, Brussels.
histoGraph was developed as part of the EU-funded CUbRIK project to create an interface for accessing historical sources and discovering links between entities. It builds a social graph of people in photos of European integration history by having humans and AI work together to identify faces, which are then linked based on co-occurrence. Users can interact with the graph to explore connections between individuals and supporting documents. The system represents the complexity of truth in the humanities by allowing multiple answers to identity questions and facilitating discussion between experts.
Citizen enhanced open science in the cultural heritage sectorWeb2Learn
This document summarizes 8 citizen science initiatives in Belgium that contribute to open science and cultural heritage. The initiatives engage citizens in activities like crowdsourcing annotations, sharing migration stories, and documenting street art. They aim to move beyond just having citizens collect data by involving them throughout the research process. The initiatives vary in their openness, with some openly sharing datasets, metadata, and results while others are less transparent. Overall they demonstrate how citizen science can enhance open science and cultural heritage but more work is still needed to formalize open data standards and ensure projects follow core open science principles.
This document discusses a project called Digital Social Innovation that has three objectives: defining and understanding digital social innovation's potential, crowdmapping organizations working in the field, and developing policy recommendations to better support it. The project will map over 1,000 organizations across Europe involved in digital social innovation through open knowledge, open networks, open data and open hardware. It will analyze the network connections and identify strong and weak networks. The findings will feed into recommendations for the European Commission to better support this area. The project website is digitalsocial.eu, which aims to be a long-term resource for the digital social innovation community.
Data-driven art residencies to reshape the media value chain-BlotOECD CFE
Presentation by Manon Blot, Project Manager, Cultural and Artistic activities and EU projects, France at the 6th Summer Academy on Cultural and Creative Industries and Local Development "Disrupting tradition: How digital technology is changing the cultural and creative processes", 18-20 Sept. 2023 ONLINE and 27-29 Sept. 2023 ONSITE (Trento, Italy).
More info: https://oe.cd/sacci
Visit our website: www.oecd.org/cfe
Follow us on Twitter: @OECD_local
This document discusses knowledge sharing and open access in the European Union. It notes that open access to publications and data from publicly funded research will help realize the vision of a unified European research area. The document outlines goals for open access, including having open access strategies in all EU countries by 2014 and 100% open access to publications by 2020. It also discusses barriers to open access and knowledge transfer between universities, public research organizations, and businesses. It proposes several actions to address these issues and foster scientific excellence and innovation in the EU.
The document provides an overview of the InGRID project, which aims to integrate and improve the multi-site research infrastructure for studying poverty, living conditions, working conditions, and vulnerability in Europe. Some key points:
- InGRID involves 17 partners across 13 data centers in 10 countries and aims to support comparative social science research through access to data and expertise.
- The infrastructure integrates data archives, EU-wide databases, and new data collection efforts related to topics like poverty, living conditions, working conditions, and job quality.
- InGRID aims to stabilize and improve this infrastructure to better support the social science community's evidence-based contributions toward Europe 2020 goals of inclusive growth and addressing issues like unemployment, poverty
The DOIT program is a European initiative funded by the Horizon 2020 program to develop and test a new approach to entrepreneurial education and social innovation for youth ages 6 to 16. The DOIT approach integrates entrepreneurial education, makerspaces using digital fabrication tools, and social innovation. The DOIT toolbox provides open resources for learners and facilitators. Initial pilots in makerspaces have seen youth create projects addressing drinking water for rabbits, massage belts, and air pollution sensors. The DOIT program aims to collect over 100 success stories of young social innovators and provide policy recommendations and online training for facilitators.
Public engagement (for trainers) 8. public engagement full slide deckpipersfp7project
This document outlines training for researchers on public engagement skills for EU-funded projects. It discusses identifying target audiences and influencers, and planning public engagement campaigns. Researchers will practice communicating their work to non-experts and giving feedback. Later sections describe the roles of Communications Officers and Liaison Officers in coordinating dissemination activities and maintaining contact between project partners.
This presentation is on co-creation and was delivered by Max Kortlander at the OpenGovIntelligence propject conference on Nov 22nd 2018 at Delft university of Technology
Assinen open research_data_in_store_and_open_your_data_20171023passinen
The document discusses open research data and the importance of openness. It provides information on EU policies and frameworks that promote open access and open data, including Horizon 2020. Key points include:
- The EU aims to promote open access to research data and publications through Horizon 2020 to increase innovation and scientific progress.
- Horizon 2020 guidelines outline the FAIR principles for research data management - making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.
- The EU Parliament mandated open access to research data and publications in Horizon 2020 to increase knowledge circulation and exploitation.
- Non-compliance with open access and open data requirements in Horizon 2020 could result in a reduction of grants or other measures.
This document summarizes a webinar presentation about an Urban Living Lab Framework. It begins by welcoming attendees and informing them that the presentation will start shortly. Attendees are instructed to remain muted until the question and answer session, and to enter any questions in the chat box. The webinar is also noted as being recorded. The presentation outline includes defining what a living lab and urban living lab are, their key components, and theoretical foundations. It then discusses the urban living lab framework in more detail, outlining its key components of governance and management, financing and business models, urban context, nature-based solutions, and partners including citizens.
This document outlines plans for a public engagement exercise. Participants will explain their research to partners and present on their partner's research. They will then plan a public engagement campaign targeting specific audiences. Campaigns will be judged on effectiveness, originality and budget. The document also provides guidance on identifying target audiences, influencers, and roles for communications officers and liaison officers in coordinating public outreach activities.
Ramon Rentmeester (AgentschapNL) @ Horizon 2020 voorlichtingsbijeenkomstMedia Perspectives
This document discusses opportunities for media, ICT, and gaming projects in Horizon 2020, the EU's research and innovation program for 2014-2020. Horizon 2020 has three pillars: excellent science, industrial leadership, and societal challenges. It places more emphasis on innovation and features simpler rules. Relevant funding opportunities for media, ICT, and gaming include the ICT calls on technologies for creative industries, big data innovation, supporting ICT creative industry SMEs, advanced digital gaming technologies, and new ICT-based solutions for energy efficiency. Information days will be held in January 2014 to provide more details on the ICT calls. National support is also available to help access Horizon 2020 funding.
The DOIT project aims to develop and test a new learning approach for early entrepreneurial education combining social innovation, makerspaces, and digital fabrication tools. It involves pilot programs in 10 European countries reaching over 1,000 children ages 6-16. Initial evaluations found the programs improved children's self-efficacy, creativity, and teamwork. The document outlines DOIT's 7-step program and provides examples of projects from Belgium and Austria where children created solutions like a personal fan or laundry room dehydrator. It concludes with 4 policy recommendations including raising awareness of makerspaces' potential, expanding makerspace infrastructure in schools, and supporting teacher training in entrepreneurial skills.
This document summarizes a report on growing a digital social innovation ecosystem in Europe. Some key findings include:
1) Digital technologies are well-suited to helping civic action by mobilizing communities, sharing resources, and spreading power. Examples of digital social innovations (DSI) range from social networks for health conditions to open data platforms.
2) The report identifies four main technological trends in DSI - open hardware, open networks, open data, and open knowledge. Examples like Safecast and OpenCorporates are provided.
3) Over 990 DSI organizations and 6,000 projects have been mapped. Most projects focus on education and participation. The network is still fragmented with few well-connected
Similar to "Breaking the Barriers to Citizen Science" (20)
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically youngSérgio Sacani
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.
"Breaking the Barriers to Citizen Science"
1. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
Artemis Skarlatidou
Muki Haklay
Alice Sheppard
Claudia Goebel
Breaking the Barriers to Citizen Science
D-04: Tools for People Running Projects
University College London
European Citizen Science Association
2. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
togetherscience.eu
“DITOS” is ….
11 partners across Europe
H2020 program; €3.5 million
500 events to engage 1.4m people:
“A step change in European
participation in science and
innovation”
“Wide and deep public engagement”
3. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
Types of events:
Biodesign; Environmental Sustainability
Target
Audiences
General public
Policy makers
Businesses
Researchers
Students
Women & Girls
People without
Internet (~30%
Europeans)
BioBlitz
Co-lab workshops
Science film nights
Bio art
iGamer
Digital space
Innovation hubs
DIY Science
Instructables
Travelling exhibition
bus
Exhibitions
Science in Schools
4. 64M UK population
8.5M BBC Attenborough & the Giant Dinosaur
520,000 in RSPB Big Garden Birdwatch
40,000 in British Trust of Ornithology surveys
500 in BioHacking & DIY Science
60,000 in Oxford ClimatePrediction.net
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
The “DITOS” Escalator Model
5. Popular science book reader
Science websites + Galaxy Zoo classifier
Galaxy Zoo forum moderator
Community manager ExCiteS
Citizen science research
Galaxy Zoo / citizen science ambassador
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
Why could Alice move “up” at each stage?
Why might someone else not?
“Dreams are maps”
(Pale Blue Dot, 1994)
6. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
The Logic Model:
a visual tool
Inputs Activities Outputs Short-
term
Medium-
term
Long-
term
… … … … … …
• Early accomplishments → long-term impacts
• Commonly used in NGOs, social interventions
• Plans programme / initiative / project
• Monitors progress
• Evaluates results
• Communicates to funders, stakeholders etc.
“I’ll know Outcome X has happened when I see Indicator Y”
Processes Outcomes
7. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
The DITOS Logic Model: Mapping the
change you want to achieve
Gather Data
+
independent
CS events
Science
Bus
e.g. that the escalator is real …. e.g. bad press, Brexit ….
8. Inputs Activities Outputs
Short-
term
Medium-
term
Long-
term
Funds
CS in
museum
+1 person
…
Engage-
ment
Public
confidence
Partners
&
Sponsor
Travelling
bus
Child takes
experiment
home
STEM
interest
Uptake of
STEM at
school
More
gender /
income
equality in
science
Processes Outcomes
A few changes we
want to achieve
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
9. togetherscience.eu/signup
Project Slam tonight!
Doing-it-Together Science: Amplifying & Cross-Pollinating
Citizen & DIY Science in Europe
Claudia Goebel - European Citizen Science Association
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 709433
Please join Doing It Together Science
(You don’t have to be in Europe!)
@togethersci
@mhaklay
@penguingalaxy
Please email us at:
info@togetherscience.eu
m.haklay@ucl.ac.uk
a.sheppard@ucl.ac.uk
a.skarlatidou@ucl.ac.uk