Presented by
T. Vaishnavi
 Contents:
 Introduction
 Invention
 Equipment and technology
 Technique
 Comparison with other technologies
 Role in criminal proceedings
 Applications
 Advantages
 Disadvantages
 Conclusion
 INTRODUCTION
 Brain fingerprinting is a scientific technique to determine
whether or not specific information is stored in an individual's
brain.
 Measure the response to the Visual and the Audio stimulus.
 It does this by measuring electrical brainwave response to
words ,phrases or pictures that are presented on computer
screen.
 INVENTION:
 Brain fingerprinting was invented by Dr. Lawrence A
in the year 1995. Farwell The chief scientist and
president of Human Brain Research Laboratory, USA.
Is based on the theory that throughout any event, the
brain plans,records and executes all the actions.
 Equipment and technology:
The brain fingerprinting system comprises:-
1. A personal computer.
2. A data acquisition board.
3. Two monitors.
4. A EEG amplifier.
5. Software for data acquisition Some electrodes.
 Technique:
 When someone commits a crime, his brain records it has
a memory .
 Brain Fingerprinting seeks to reveal that memory, by
showing the suspect evidence taken from the crime
scene.
 A head band with sensors is placed on the subject.
 A series of pictures or words is flashed on the screen.
 The computer records the brain waves produced in
response to what the subject sees.
P300
 The brain responses called a P300/ MERMER are
recorded as a wave form of human neurons which
response to stimulus.
 P300 wave is an event related potential (ERP) which can
be recorded via Electroencephalgraphy (EEG).
 Electroencephalography:
 Electroencephalography
(EEG) is the measurement of
electrical activity produced by
the brain as recorded from
electrodes placed on the scalp.
 EEG signals (in the range of
mille-volts) are amplified and
digitalized for later processing.
 Comparison with other technologies:
Brain fingerprinting is fundamentally different from the
polygraph (lie-detector), which measures emotion-based
physiological signals such as heart rate, sweating, and
blood pressure
Also, unlike polygraph testing, it does not attempt to
determine whether or not the subject is lying or telling
the truth.
 Role In Criminal Proceedings:
APPLICATIONS
Medical Counter Terrorism
Criminal Justice Terrorist Activities
Brain
Fingerprinting
 Advantages:
The various advantages are as follows:-
1. The rate of error is extremely low virtually
nonexistent and clear standards governing.
2. Record of 100% accuracy.
3. Identifies the criminal quickly and scientifically.
4. Provides immediate scientific result.
5. Reduced costs and complexities.
6. Support the right to a speedy and fair trail.
 Disadvantages:
The various disadvantages are as follows:-
1. Not applicable for general screening.
2. It does not indicate intent of the crime.
3. Takes a fair amount of time to set up and conduct
properly .
4. Difficult to distinguish the criminal and a witness
who saw all the criminal activity happen.
Conclusions:
 Brain Fingerprinting is a revolutionary new scientific
technology for solving The technology fulfills an urgent need
crimes, identifying perpetrators, and for governments, law
enforcement exonerating innocent suspects, with a agencies,
corporations, investigators, record of 100% accuracy in
research crime victims, and falsely accused, with US
government agencies, actual innocent suspects. criminal cases,
and other applications.

Brain_Fingerprinting_Technology 2.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
     Contents:  Introduction Invention  Equipment and technology  Technique  Comparison with other technologies  Role in criminal proceedings  Applications  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion
  • 3.
     INTRODUCTION  Brainfingerprinting is a scientific technique to determine whether or not specific information is stored in an individual's brain.  Measure the response to the Visual and the Audio stimulus.  It does this by measuring electrical brainwave response to words ,phrases or pictures that are presented on computer screen.
  • 4.
     INVENTION:  Brainfingerprinting was invented by Dr. Lawrence A in the year 1995. Farwell The chief scientist and president of Human Brain Research Laboratory, USA. Is based on the theory that throughout any event, the brain plans,records and executes all the actions.
  • 5.
     Equipment andtechnology: The brain fingerprinting system comprises:- 1. A personal computer. 2. A data acquisition board. 3. Two monitors. 4. A EEG amplifier. 5. Software for data acquisition Some electrodes.
  • 6.
     Technique:  Whensomeone commits a crime, his brain records it has a memory .  Brain Fingerprinting seeks to reveal that memory, by showing the suspect evidence taken from the crime scene.  A head band with sensors is placed on the subject.  A series of pictures or words is flashed on the screen.  The computer records the brain waves produced in response to what the subject sees.
  • 7.
    P300  The brainresponses called a P300/ MERMER are recorded as a wave form of human neurons which response to stimulus.  P300 wave is an event related potential (ERP) which can be recorded via Electroencephalgraphy (EEG).
  • 8.
     Electroencephalography:  Electroencephalography (EEG)is the measurement of electrical activity produced by the brain as recorded from electrodes placed on the scalp.  EEG signals (in the range of mille-volts) are amplified and digitalized for later processing.
  • 9.
     Comparison withother technologies: Brain fingerprinting is fundamentally different from the polygraph (lie-detector), which measures emotion-based physiological signals such as heart rate, sweating, and blood pressure Also, unlike polygraph testing, it does not attempt to determine whether or not the subject is lying or telling the truth.
  • 10.
     Role InCriminal Proceedings:
  • 11.
    APPLICATIONS Medical Counter Terrorism CriminalJustice Terrorist Activities Brain Fingerprinting
  • 12.
     Advantages: The variousadvantages are as follows:- 1. The rate of error is extremely low virtually nonexistent and clear standards governing. 2. Record of 100% accuracy. 3. Identifies the criminal quickly and scientifically. 4. Provides immediate scientific result. 5. Reduced costs and complexities. 6. Support the right to a speedy and fair trail.
  • 13.
     Disadvantages: The variousdisadvantages are as follows:- 1. Not applicable for general screening. 2. It does not indicate intent of the crime. 3. Takes a fair amount of time to set up and conduct properly . 4. Difficult to distinguish the criminal and a witness who saw all the criminal activity happen.
  • 14.
    Conclusions:  Brain Fingerprintingis a revolutionary new scientific technology for solving The technology fulfills an urgent need crimes, identifying perpetrators, and for governments, law enforcement exonerating innocent suspects, with a agencies, corporations, investigators, record of 100% accuracy in research crime victims, and falsely accused, with US government agencies, actual innocent suspects. criminal cases, and other applications.