BPS Written Case Presentation appraisal form Grading Rubric – Case paper - 100 points available Each written case should be a 5-6 double spaced report (not including any materials in the appendix). Team ________________________ Date ______________ Case: _________________________________ Written Grade:________ Criteria Excellent 12 points Good 8 points Incomplete 4 point 1 Organization Profile & case summary Provides full background on the case, organization, organization structure & other factors Provides basic background on the case Components of case background etc. are missing 2 Business unit profile Provides a full outline of the unit under review including its contribution to the organization and its position in the organization structure Provides a basic outline of the unit under review Components such as the unit’s contribution or position in the organization’s structure are missing 3 Problem description Identifies the key issues (gap between expected and actual results) with supporting data. Provides an analysis to support the problem description Does not specify the gap between expected and actual performance; or does not supply supporting information and analysis Does not explain the key issues in detail or is missing key information 4 Case questions Clearly answers each question using course materials and theories Response to questions is vague, or use of course materials is missing Question answers are not clear - key points are missing 5 Use of appropriate analysis and integration of course content Links two or more course concepts to the defined problem showing how they affirm or deny the problem. Explain why these course concepts were chosen and how they helped define the problem Course concepts not clearly identified or linked to the problem or there are gaps in the way the analysis is explained and verified Limited use of course concepts or incorrect linking of concepts to the problem. Does not explain why the selected concepts were chosen 6 Recommendations Clear recommendations using course terms and concepts in a linked and understandable manner. Includes follow-up criteria and a measure of effectiveness. Limited use of course terms and concepts. Limited or no measureable follow-up. Poor use of course concepts and little notation of measureable follow-up 7 Report clarity and cohesiveness Paper is +/- 6 to 10 pages, follows points 1 through 6 above, typed with all attachments in an appendix. Paper explains all key points Some points not clearly developed and some lose ends Points are difficult to understand, key points are missed or incomplete. Grammatical errors are noted 8 Appendix Includes all tables, charts, graphics, interview questions, analysis rubrics, etc Some tables, charts, etc. are missing Very limited attachments or support documents 9 + 4 points Presented on time and in proper format (+4.0) Presented on time. Some formatting issues (+2.5) Presented late (+0.0) G310 Advanced Analytics and St ...