1. BOOTS - feel good
2. OBJECTIVE OF THE CASE
3. SALES PROMOTION STRATEGY
4. WHAT IS BOOTS?
5. Situation analysis
6. About the company…
7. COMPANY’S EARLY DAYS
8.
9. The MODERN ERA
10.
11. associated celebrities and the brands.
12. CHARLES WORTHINGTON
13. JOHN FRIEDA
14. NICKY CLARKE
15. UMBERTO GIANNINI
16. TONI & GUY
17. TREVOR SORBIE
18. LEE STAFFORD
19. competitors
20. P&G
21. ALBERTO CULVER
22. LOREAL
23. TESCO
24. MORRISON
25. SUPERDRUGS
26. CONSUMERS – NOT VERY BRAND LOYAL…..WHY?
27. CONSUMER’S VIEW/ PERCEPTION - CHANGING BRANDS GIVE BETTER RESULTS
28. CHANGING TREND IN BUYING BEHAVIOUR - trends in buying behaviour led to changing preferences. Whereas in the
’70s consumers wanted shampoos that were gentle, the ’80s saw a greater
emphasis on detangling, and in the ’90s, shiny hair became more important
29. TOO MANY OPTIONS…-difficult for consumers to identify meaningful differences between the
various brands available in any given store. Consumers had a large number of
choices that varied not only on brand name, but also packaging, advertising, price,
ingredients, consistency, fragrance and so forth
30. DECISION –
31. 3 PROMOTIONAL ALTERNATIVES
32. 3 for 2
33. GIFT WITH PURCHASE
34. and
35. ON PACK COUPONS
36. 3 FOR 2 ADVANTAGES
37. 3 FOR 2 DIADVANTAGES
38. GWP ADVANTAGES
39. GWP DIADVANTAGES
40. ON PACK COUPONS ADVANTAGES
41. ON PACK COUPONS DISADVANTAGES
42. COSTS AND EXPENSES
43. SOME STATS
44. 3 F0R 2 CALCULATIONS
45. 3 F0R 2 CALCULATIONS
46. GWP CALCULATIONS
47. GWP CALCULATIONS
48. OPC CALCULATIONS
49. OPC CALCULATIONS
50. AVERAGE PRICE COMPARISON FOR 100 ML IN TABLE – AVERAGE IS TAKEN OF THE UPPER AND LOWER LIMITS OF THE PRICE RANGE.
51. EXPLANATION
52. EXPLANATION
53. SOLUTION
54. SUMMARY
55. DISCLAIMER
56. THANK YOU
51. Fromthe table, it isevident that
price range of 3 items ofthe same brand
are NOTTHE SAME
– ranging from ~ £2 to ~ £10.
So, even though “3 for 2” offer willcreate a larger
consumer base, it CAN NOT BE APPLIED for every
brand.
52. Among the remaining 2 alternatives -
OPC willbe MAXIMISING the profitbutit
WILL NOT be tradingupthe consumer’s much.
while
GWP isINCREASING the profit andalsoINCREASING the
customer base APPRECIABLY.
54. SUMMARY
OBJECTIVEOF THE CASE
Whatis the
caseabout?
DECISION
SOLUTION
THREE
PROMOTIONAL
ALTERNATIVES
So,the secondalternative–
GIFTWITHPURCHASEshould
be chosenasthe promotional
strategy.
55. DISCLAIMER
Created by Harshit Singh, IIT Madras, during a marketing management
internship by Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow.