Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byAdrian Holzer
Blended interactions
The document discusses the use of co-located social media in classrooms to enhance interactions among students and teachers, focusing on user feedback and interaction patterns. It identifies benefits such as increased participation and interactivity but also highlights challenges like irrelevant messages and the need for effective message filtering. Guidelines for designing a synergy between digital and face-to-face interactions are proposed, emphasizing simplicity, anonymity, and the importance of etiquette in guiding interactions.
More Related Content
Similar to Blended interactions
Blended interactions
- 1. Blending Digital andFace-to-face Interaction using Co-located Social Media in the Classroom Adrian Holzer
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 9. RQ1 How canco-located social media affect interaction in classroom audiences? RQ2 How to design for a synergy between digital and face-to-face interaction?
- 10. RQ1 How canco-located social media affect interaction in classroom audiences?
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16. 1 Prof 100 Students200 Students Monday Wednesday 223 responses 4 hours every week for 6 weeks
- 17.
- 18. Week1 60 30 0 Week2 Week3 Week4Week5 Week6 Numberofinteractions More interaction with SpeakUp No SpeakUp SpeakUp
- 19.
- 20. Generally good! Positivecomments in course evaluations (N=141)
- 21. All comments onthe ComA course evaluation related to SpeakUp verbatim U"lisa"on à l'app SpeakUp à généraliser. Réguler speak up. Les professeurs sont vraiment impliqués ! Le cours est beau, bien préparé ! + SpeakUp Les profs ont été toujours clairs. L'u6lisa6on de SpeakUp Ajouter des clickers. SpeakUp intéressant mais pas performant. 😀 😀 😀 😐 #
- 22. Content I don’t understanddifferentiation by product compared to conformity +35 Organisation Be careful with the background color of your slides, the text is sometimes hard to read +5 Not relevant We’re qualified-46 Interactions were coded in three categories
- 23. Week1 60 30 0 Week2 Week3 Week4Week5 Week6 Numberofinteractions No SpeakUp SpeakUp
- 24. 60 30 0 Numberofinteractions Not relevant F2F Content Content Organisation Week1Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Many of the interactions are not relevant to to teacher
- 25. What kind ofnon relevant messages?
- 26. Lecture related Look forthe sickest marlboro ad ever+1 Fun Chuck Norris is the biggest blood donor, but it’s never his own +3 Social Pez, do you wanna marry me?+2 News We’re qualified-43 We’ve been qualified for a month+29 We further coded the interactions not relevant to the teacher in four categories
- 27. 60 30 0 Numberofinteractions Not relevant F2F Content Content Organisation Week1Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6
- 28. 60 30 0 Numberofinteractions Week1 Week2 Week3Week4 Week5 Week6 Not relevant
- 29. 60 30 0 Numberofinteractions Week1 Week2 Week3Week4 Week5 Week6 Misc Fun Social News Lecture
- 30. 30 0 Numberofinteractions 60 Week1 Week2 Week3Week4 Week5 Week6 Unrelated interactions are of many types Social News Lecture Misc Fun
- 31. How can wefilter these messages?
- 32. Lecture related Fun Social News Misc Social voting Mixedresults, doesn’t always work, there are many instances of false positive
- 33. Theoretically we wouldlike to easily identify the bad apples Numberofgoodmessages Number of bad messages 10 5 0 5 10 Ban bad apples
- 34. Ban bad apples Theoreticallywe would like to easily identify the bad apples Numberofgoodmessages Number of bad messages 10 5 0 5 10 😇 😈 😈 😇 😇 😇 😇 😇 😇 😈
- 35. 😈😈😇 Practically It looksa bit more messy Numberofgoodmessages Number of bad messages 10 5 0 5 10 😇 😇 😇 😈😈 😋 😋 😋 😋 😋 😋 😋😋 😋 😋 😋 Ban bad apples
- 36. Require identity Might work,but can backfire and reduce interaction
- 37. Censorship Our experience hasshown that it can backfire, peer tagging is to be tested IS12
- 38. F2F etiquette Our experiencehas shown that it can work well Com14PM13IS12
- 39. Backchannel Front channel Are interactionsdirected to lecturers or peers?
- 40. 60 30 0 Numberofinteractions Not relevant F2F Content Content Organisation Week1Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6
- 41. Week6 60 30 0 Numberofinteractions Not relevant Relevant Week1 Week2Week3 Week4 Week5
- 42. 30 0 Numberofinteractions Not relevant Relevant 15 Week1 Week2Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Not relevant Relevant Front channel Back channel Front channel interactions are almost all relevant, most backchannel is noise
- 43. Students want tokeep a backchannel open
- 44. Tag relevant messages Canpotentially hide the messages from the lecturer @prof
- 45. RQ1 How canco-located social media affect interaction in classroom audiences? co-located Social Media can improve interactions in the classroom Interactions are of a rich mix of kinds on both the front and back channels anonymity increases interaction but can also lead to non-relevant messages
- 46. RQ1 How canco-located social media affect interaction in classroom audiences? RQ2 How to design for a synergy between digital and face-to-face interaction?
- 47. RQ2 How todesign for a synergy between digital and face-to-face interaction?
- 48. Guideline 1 –Facilitate access with little or no registration Guideline 2 – Facilitate usage with simple features Design for first use
- 49. Guideline 3 –Provide concealed identity Design for more digital interaction Guideline 4 – Design for privacy Guideline 5 – Make the interaction temporary
- 51. Guideline 6 –Make use of f2f etiquette to guide digital interaction Design for richer digital interaction Guideline 7 – Embrace the backchannel and try to separate it from the front channel
- 52. Guideline 8 –Design for awareness Design for digital f2f transitions Guideline 9 – Design for reflection
- 53. RQ2 How todesign for a synergy between digital and face-to-face interaction? Facilitate first use, get users onboard Improve content, more and better interaction Improve action, more awareness during and after the interaction
- 54.