The document reviews a music video, noting both good and bad points. It praises the video's clear camera quality, exciting singers and setting that fit the song. However, it also criticizes aspects like deteriorating camera work over time, repetitive elements and dull lip syncing. Suggested improvements include better lighting, lip syncing and enthusiasm from singers to make the video higher quality overall.

1. Billionaire Bruno Mars

2. Bad points
 Throughout the music video the quality of the





camera wasn’t good
Throughout the middle and towards the end they
were repetitive
Sometimes the lighting was abysmal
The lip syncing was out of time to the song
the singers were not enthusiastic when lip
syncing, making it a little dull.
The camera width was squashed together at
some points through out the video.

3. Good points
 The start of the video was high-quality.
 The quality of the camera through out the video




was clear.
The setting of the recordings synergies the song
they were singing.
The songsters in the video were exultant which
also synergies the song they were singing.
The words in the song suited with the actions
which they were doing in there music video.
The send off suited the song they were lip
syncing.

4. Improvements
 The camera quality.
 Change the actions in the music video as they




were repetitive.
enhanced lighting was needed, as throughout the
music video it appeared to be slightly dim.
improved lip syncing though out the music
video.
Singers should be enthusiastic when lip syncing,
making the expression like they were actually
singing.
The camera quality must be clear. Also the size of
the music video must have the right aspect ratio
to match the recommended size of a music video.