SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 1 of 4
FOSHAN LUXRICH OFFICE FURNITURE CO,. LTD.
NO.4, 3RD FLOOR, (2ND WORKING PLANT), HOU BEIGANG, BEISHE AREA,
TANGLIAN INDUSTRIAL ZONE OF SONGGANG, SHISHAN TOWN, NANHAI DISTRICT,
FOSHAN CITY, GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA PRC.
The following sample(s) was / were submitted and identified on behalf of the client as:
Sample Description : LUXRICH CENTRE FOLDING TABLE
Sample Receiving Date : Oct.24, 2016
Sample 1st
Resubmission Date : Nov.17, 2016
Sample 2nd
Resubmission Date : Nov.30, 2016
Sample 3rd
Resubmission Date : Dec.09, 2016
Test Performing Date : Oct.24, 2016 to Dec.12, 2016
Test Result Summary
Test(s) Requested Result(s)
Partial tests of ANSI/BIFMA X 5.5-2014 PASS
Summary:
1. For further details, please refer to the following page(s).
Signed for and on behalf of
Shunde Branch
SGS-CSTC Co., Ltd.
Bill Wang
Approved signatory
Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 2 of 4
TESTS AND RESULTS
Test Conducted:
Partial tests of ANSI/BIFMA X 5.5-2014 Desk / Table Products – Tests.
General Test Condition:
The following test program was conducted in a laboratory environment maintained at 15°C to 25°C and 50%±5
RH. The sample was individually tested after conditioning in the test environment for at least 24 hours prior to
conducting the test.
The complete detailed procedures may be found in the referenced specification and are only summarized herein.
No. of Sample:
2 pieces (Sample 1,2). For more sample information and pictures, please refer to the following page.
Test Test Description and Requirements Test Results
4.4
Horizontal Stability Test for Desk/Tables with Casters
Apply a 11.4 kg (25 lb) static load through a 203 mm (8 in.) diameter
disk centered 102 mm (4 in.) from the edge of the top of the desk/table
at the least stable location. Gradually apply a horizontal force to the
leading edge of the top surface, until 44.5 N (10 lbf.) is reached, or the
product tilts to 10 degrees minimum, whichever occurs first. The unit
shall not tip over. If an extendible element(s) opens during the test and
prevents the unit from tipping over due to contact with the test platform,
the unit does not meet the acceptance criteria.
PASS
5.2
Concentrated Functional Load Test
Apply the specified concentrated load to the primary surface per Table
1 through a 305 mm (12 in.) diameter disk so that its center is 178 mm
(7 in.) from the unit’s edge at its apparent weakest point. Loads shall
be allowed to remain for 60 minutes and then removed. There shall be
no loss of serviceability. Upon completion of the test, the extendible
member(s) shall meet the pull force requirements of Section 19.
PASS
5.3
Distributed Functional Load Test
Depending on the desk/table surface classification, apply the specified
distributed loads per Table 1 for 60 minutes and then removed. There
shall be no loss of serviceability. Upon the completion of the test, the
extendible member(s) shall meet the pull force requirements of Section
19.
PASS
5.4
Concentrated Proof Load Test
The setup shall be performed per Section 5.2.1 with the appropriate
concentrated proof load per Table 1, Loads shall be allowed to remain
for 15 minutes and then removed. There shall be no sudden and major
change in the structural integrity of the product. Loss of serviceability is
acceptable.
PASS
Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 3 of 4
Test Test Description and Requirements Test Results
5.5
Distributed Proof Load Test
Perform the setup per Section 5.3.1 using the appropriate distributed
proof loads per Table 1,
Loads shall be allowed to remain for 15 minutes and then removed.
There shall be no sudden and major change in the structural integrity
of the product. Loss of serviceability is acceptable.
PASS
6
Top Load Ease Cycle Test
The bag of 200 lbs (91kg) shall be raised until the entire weight is off
the primary surface and then eased (without impact) onto the primary
surface for a total of 10,000 cycles, so that it takes the entire weight
without any support from the cycling device. There shall be no loss of
serviceability to the unit. Before and after the cycling test, the
extendible elements shall meet the pull force test requirements in
Section 19.
PASS
8.3
Leg Strength Test – Functional
Attach a loading device to the support member to be loaded. The
placement of the loading device shall be within 25 mm (1 in.) of the end
of the support member/glide assembly that makes contact with the
floor. Individually and separately apply the functional horizontal forces
("A" and "B"). No loss of serviceability shall occur as a result of the
application of the functional loads. After application of the functional
loads, each extendible element in a leg-attached desk pedestal shall
be tested to and meet the pull force requirements of Section 19. For
tilt-top tables, release of the top latching mechanism during the test is
considered a loss of serviceability.
PASS
8.5
Leg Strength Test – Proof
Repeat the above functional test producer with proof force. Application
of the proof loads shall cause no sudden and major change in the
structural integrity of the product. Loss of serviceability is acceptable.
PASS
18
Durability Test for Desks and Tables with Casters
Cycle the desk/table unit for the appropriate number of cycles over a
platform with and without obstructions. There shall be no loss of
serviceability to a caster or the desk/table.
PASS
Remark:
1. N/A – Not applicable; N/R – Not Requested; N/P – Not provided.
2. For the sample information and pictures, please refer to the following page.
Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 4 of 4
SAMPLE INFORMATION AND PICTURES
Weight: 69.00 kg
Overall Dimensions: 2400 mm L x 1200 mm W x 715 mm H
Other Dimensions: /
Sample as Received
View 1 View 2
View 3
***End of Report***

More Related Content

What's hot

Fatigue Technology - Corporate Brochure
Fatigue Technology - Corporate BrochureFatigue Technology - Corporate Brochure
Fatigue Technology - Corporate BrochureStephen Aubrey
 
Abrasive flow machning
Abrasive flow machningAbrasive flow machning
Abrasive flow machning
ssuser4d5bc7
 
Processo de laminacao
Processo de laminacaoProcesso de laminacao
Processo de laminacao
Beatriz Santos
 
Conformação mecânica - Forjamento
Conformação mecânica - ForjamentoConformação mecânica - Forjamento
Conformação mecânica - Forjamento
Gabriel Sana
 
1 Basic Punching Theory Tt 2010
1  Basic Punching Theory Tt  20101  Basic Punching Theory Tt  2010
1 Basic Punching Theory Tt 2010Christer Lindholm
 
Weld defects and discontinuities
Weld defects and discontinuitiesWeld defects and discontinuities
Weld defects and discontinuities
Nima Tajallipour
 
Welders visual inspection_handbook-2013_web
Welders visual inspection_handbook-2013_webWelders visual inspection_handbook-2013_web
Welders visual inspection_handbook-2013_web
miguelbravo
 
Conformação mecânica
Conformação mecânicaConformação mecânica
Conformação mecânicaVitor Paese
 
Starrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas Manuais
Starrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas ManuaisStarrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas Manuais
Starrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas Manuais
Starrett Brasil
 
45920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products1
45920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products145920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products1
45920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products1
Radi Nasr
 
Forjamento
ForjamentoForjamento
Forjamento
Brandon Coelho
 
Curso basico de lingotamento continuo
Curso basico de lingotamento continuoCurso basico de lingotamento continuo
Curso basico de lingotamento continuo
Cristiano Faustino Almeida
 
Origem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa liga
Origem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa ligaOrigem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa liga
Origem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa liga
Jorge Madias
 
Trabalho processos de fabricação
Trabalho processos de fabricaçãoTrabalho processos de fabricação
Trabalho processos de fabricação
Paulo Seabra
 
Trefilação
TrefilaçãoTrefilação
Trefilação
Dirk Henning
 
Explosive forming
Explosive formingExplosive forming
Explosive forming
SAMEER VISHWAKARMA
 
Incremental sheet forming
Incremental sheet formingIncremental sheet forming
Incremental sheet forming
Gustavo Peláez Lourido
 
Processo de Trefilação
Processo de TrefilaçãoProcesso de Trefilação
Processo de Trefilação
Rafael Leal
 

What's hot (20)

Fatigue Technology - Corporate Brochure
Fatigue Technology - Corporate BrochureFatigue Technology - Corporate Brochure
Fatigue Technology - Corporate Brochure
 
01 fluidos de corte
01 fluidos de corte01 fluidos de corte
01 fluidos de corte
 
Abrasive flow machning
Abrasive flow machningAbrasive flow machning
Abrasive flow machning
 
Processo de laminacao
Processo de laminacaoProcesso de laminacao
Processo de laminacao
 
Conformação mecânica - Forjamento
Conformação mecânica - ForjamentoConformação mecânica - Forjamento
Conformação mecânica - Forjamento
 
1 Basic Punching Theory Tt 2010
1  Basic Punching Theory Tt  20101  Basic Punching Theory Tt  2010
1 Basic Punching Theory Tt 2010
 
Weld defects and discontinuities
Weld defects and discontinuitiesWeld defects and discontinuities
Weld defects and discontinuities
 
Welders visual inspection_handbook-2013_web
Welders visual inspection_handbook-2013_webWelders visual inspection_handbook-2013_web
Welders visual inspection_handbook-2013_web
 
Conformação mecânica
Conformação mecânicaConformação mecânica
Conformação mecânica
 
Starrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas Manuais
Starrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas ManuaisStarrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas Manuais
Starrett - Institucional + Serras e Ferramentas Manuais
 
45920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products1
45920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products145920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products1
45920321 defects-in-hot-rolled-products1
 
Forjamento
ForjamentoForjamento
Forjamento
 
Curso basico de lingotamento continuo
Curso basico de lingotamento continuoCurso basico de lingotamento continuo
Curso basico de lingotamento continuo
 
Origem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa liga
Origem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa ligaOrigem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa liga
Origem de defeitos superficiais em tarugos de aços ao carbono e de baixa liga
 
Trabalho processos de fabricação
Trabalho processos de fabricaçãoTrabalho processos de fabricação
Trabalho processos de fabricação
 
Trefilação
TrefilaçãoTrefilação
Trefilação
 
Explosive forming
Explosive formingExplosive forming
Explosive forming
 
Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis Lecture 1
Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis Lecture 1Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis Lecture 1
Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis Lecture 1
 
Incremental sheet forming
Incremental sheet formingIncremental sheet forming
Incremental sheet forming
 
Processo de Trefilação
Processo de TrefilaçãoProcesso de Trefilação
Processo de Trefilação
 

Similar to BIFMA report.PDF

Orcco K68 Test report(1)
Orcco K68 Test report(1)Orcco K68 Test report(1)
Orcco K68 Test report(1)Bryant Chen
 
EN1335 A1511(English).PDF
EN1335 A1511(English).PDFEN1335 A1511(English).PDF
EN1335 A1511(English).PDFVanna Ye
 
Aggregate crushing strength test
Aggregate crushing strength testAggregate crushing strength test
Aggregate crushing strength test
MUST,Mirpur AJK,Pakistan
 
Qualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipmentsQualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipments
Pranali Polshettiwar
 
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatingsAstm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
ssusera68416
 
Отчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETH
Отчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETHОтчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETH
Отчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETH
SEA Company
 
METHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.ppt
METHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.pptMETHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.ppt
METHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.ppt
ShaheedAzhar
 
Ce6411 som l ab 2013_regulation
Ce6411 som l ab 2013_regulationCe6411 som l ab 2013_regulation
Ce6411 som l ab 2013_regulation
ARUNTHEGEOTECH
 
12 weeks industrial training ppt
12 weeks industrial training ppt12 weeks industrial training ppt
12 weeks industrial training ppt
Gurjant Singh
 
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soilsAstm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
nktivan
 
Webster users-manual
Webster users-manualWebster users-manual
Webster users-manual
TX Testing Instruments Co., Ltd.
 
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003Minh Bui Si
 
Tensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild Steel
Tensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild SteelTensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild Steel
Tensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild Steel
Gulfam Hussain
 
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx
AnduelSelamaj2
 
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx
AnduelSelamaj2
 
Corner Post Project
Corner Post ProjectCorner Post Project
Corner Post Project
tabyrnes
 
Lab reports transportation engineering i
Lab reports transportation engineering iLab reports transportation engineering i
Lab reports transportation engineering i
Sushrut Gautam
 

Similar to BIFMA report.PDF (20)

Orcco K68 Test report(1)
Orcco K68 Test report(1)Orcco K68 Test report(1)
Orcco K68 Test report(1)
 
EN1335 A1511(English).PDF
EN1335 A1511(English).PDFEN1335 A1511(English).PDF
EN1335 A1511(English).PDF
 
Aggregate crushing strength test
Aggregate crushing strength testAggregate crushing strength test
Aggregate crushing strength test
 
5816
58165816
5816
 
Qualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipmentsQualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipments
 
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatingsAstm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
 
2905
29052905
2905
 
Отчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETH
Отчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETHОтчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETH
Отчет по ударопрочности боросиликатных линз REETH
 
METHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.ppt
METHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.pptMETHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.ppt
METHOD AND ASSESSMENT FOR LOAD TEST.ppt
 
Ce6411 som l ab 2013_regulation
Ce6411 som l ab 2013_regulationCe6411 som l ab 2013_regulation
Ce6411 som l ab 2013_regulation
 
Ip
IpIp
Ip
 
12 weeks industrial training ppt
12 weeks industrial training ppt12 weeks industrial training ppt
12 weeks industrial training ppt
 
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soilsAstm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
 
Webster users-manual
Webster users-manualWebster users-manual
Webster users-manual
 
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
 
Tensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild Steel
Tensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild SteelTensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild Steel
Tensile, Impact and Hardness Testing of Mild Steel
 
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGprott - EN web.pptx
 
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx
1.04 Prospekt HMP PDGpro - EN;l web.pptx
 
Corner Post Project
Corner Post ProjectCorner Post Project
Corner Post Project
 
Lab reports transportation engineering i
Lab reports transportation engineering iLab reports transportation engineering i
Lab reports transportation engineering i
 

BIFMA report.PDF

  • 1. Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 1 of 4 FOSHAN LUXRICH OFFICE FURNITURE CO,. LTD. NO.4, 3RD FLOOR, (2ND WORKING PLANT), HOU BEIGANG, BEISHE AREA, TANGLIAN INDUSTRIAL ZONE OF SONGGANG, SHISHAN TOWN, NANHAI DISTRICT, FOSHAN CITY, GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA PRC. The following sample(s) was / were submitted and identified on behalf of the client as: Sample Description : LUXRICH CENTRE FOLDING TABLE Sample Receiving Date : Oct.24, 2016 Sample 1st Resubmission Date : Nov.17, 2016 Sample 2nd Resubmission Date : Nov.30, 2016 Sample 3rd Resubmission Date : Dec.09, 2016 Test Performing Date : Oct.24, 2016 to Dec.12, 2016 Test Result Summary Test(s) Requested Result(s) Partial tests of ANSI/BIFMA X 5.5-2014 PASS Summary: 1. For further details, please refer to the following page(s). Signed for and on behalf of Shunde Branch SGS-CSTC Co., Ltd. Bill Wang Approved signatory
  • 2. Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 2 of 4 TESTS AND RESULTS Test Conducted: Partial tests of ANSI/BIFMA X 5.5-2014 Desk / Table Products – Tests. General Test Condition: The following test program was conducted in a laboratory environment maintained at 15°C to 25°C and 50%±5 RH. The sample was individually tested after conditioning in the test environment for at least 24 hours prior to conducting the test. The complete detailed procedures may be found in the referenced specification and are only summarized herein. No. of Sample: 2 pieces (Sample 1,2). For more sample information and pictures, please refer to the following page. Test Test Description and Requirements Test Results 4.4 Horizontal Stability Test for Desk/Tables with Casters Apply a 11.4 kg (25 lb) static load through a 203 mm (8 in.) diameter disk centered 102 mm (4 in.) from the edge of the top of the desk/table at the least stable location. Gradually apply a horizontal force to the leading edge of the top surface, until 44.5 N (10 lbf.) is reached, or the product tilts to 10 degrees minimum, whichever occurs first. The unit shall not tip over. If an extendible element(s) opens during the test and prevents the unit from tipping over due to contact with the test platform, the unit does not meet the acceptance criteria. PASS 5.2 Concentrated Functional Load Test Apply the specified concentrated load to the primary surface per Table 1 through a 305 mm (12 in.) diameter disk so that its center is 178 mm (7 in.) from the unit’s edge at its apparent weakest point. Loads shall be allowed to remain for 60 minutes and then removed. There shall be no loss of serviceability. Upon completion of the test, the extendible member(s) shall meet the pull force requirements of Section 19. PASS 5.3 Distributed Functional Load Test Depending on the desk/table surface classification, apply the specified distributed loads per Table 1 for 60 minutes and then removed. There shall be no loss of serviceability. Upon the completion of the test, the extendible member(s) shall meet the pull force requirements of Section 19. PASS 5.4 Concentrated Proof Load Test The setup shall be performed per Section 5.2.1 with the appropriate concentrated proof load per Table 1, Loads shall be allowed to remain for 15 minutes and then removed. There shall be no sudden and major change in the structural integrity of the product. Loss of serviceability is acceptable. PASS
  • 3. Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 3 of 4 Test Test Description and Requirements Test Results 5.5 Distributed Proof Load Test Perform the setup per Section 5.3.1 using the appropriate distributed proof loads per Table 1, Loads shall be allowed to remain for 15 minutes and then removed. There shall be no sudden and major change in the structural integrity of the product. Loss of serviceability is acceptable. PASS 6 Top Load Ease Cycle Test The bag of 200 lbs (91kg) shall be raised until the entire weight is off the primary surface and then eased (without impact) onto the primary surface for a total of 10,000 cycles, so that it takes the entire weight without any support from the cycling device. There shall be no loss of serviceability to the unit. Before and after the cycling test, the extendible elements shall meet the pull force test requirements in Section 19. PASS 8.3 Leg Strength Test – Functional Attach a loading device to the support member to be loaded. The placement of the loading device shall be within 25 mm (1 in.) of the end of the support member/glide assembly that makes contact with the floor. Individually and separately apply the functional horizontal forces ("A" and "B"). No loss of serviceability shall occur as a result of the application of the functional loads. After application of the functional loads, each extendible element in a leg-attached desk pedestal shall be tested to and meet the pull force requirements of Section 19. For tilt-top tables, release of the top latching mechanism during the test is considered a loss of serviceability. PASS 8.5 Leg Strength Test – Proof Repeat the above functional test producer with proof force. Application of the proof loads shall cause no sudden and major change in the structural integrity of the product. Loss of serviceability is acceptable. PASS 18 Durability Test for Desks and Tables with Casters Cycle the desk/table unit for the appropriate number of cycles over a platform with and without obstructions. There shall be no loss of serviceability to a caster or the desk/table. PASS Remark: 1. N/A – Not applicable; N/R – Not Requested; N/P – Not provided. 2. For the sample information and pictures, please refer to the following page.
  • 4. Test Report No.: SDHL1610020213FT Date: Dec.12, 2016 Page 4 of 4 SAMPLE INFORMATION AND PICTURES Weight: 69.00 kg Overall Dimensions: 2400 mm L x 1200 mm W x 715 mm H Other Dimensions: / Sample as Received View 1 View 2 View 3 ***End of Report***