This document summarizes key points from a presentation on redistricting given by Peter Wattson. It discusses the need for limits on partisan gerrymandering through establishing clear criteria for who draws maps, what data they can use, and principles the resulting districts must meet. It also covers requirements under the Voting Rights Act to fairly represent minorities and avoid diluting minority voting strength. Finally, it examines legal challenges to racial and partisan gerrymanders and efforts in some states to curb improper political influence through redistricting reforms.
Organization of American Political PartiesMatthew Caggia
Demonstrating a wide range of concepts, this slideshow describes the structure of political parties from the national organization down to the grassroots, as well as explaining the primary process
Organization of American Political PartiesMatthew Caggia
Demonstrating a wide range of concepts, this slideshow describes the structure of political parties from the national organization down to the grassroots, as well as explaining the primary process
April De Simone, Founder, Designing the WE
Celinda Lake, President, Lake Research Partners
Sam Munger, Director, State Innovation Exchange
Shaun Chapman, Chief of Staff, SolarCity
Richard Eidlin, Vice President, American Sustainable Business Council (moderator)
Watch this webinar: http://asbcouncil.org/video/what-election-means-sustainable-businesses#.WCzKTCSECAU
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
1. Better Maps for Illinois
Peter S. Wattson
Redistricting Conference
Paul Simon Public Policy Institute
Springfield, Illinois
April 30, 2013
2. Introduction
▪ The Facts of Life
▪ The Need for Limits
▪ Protecting Minorities
▪ Partisan Gerrymandering
3. The Facts of Life
Gerrymandering
▪ Packing
▪ Cracking
▪ Creating a Gerrymander
4. The Need for Limits
▪ People
▸ Who draws the plans
▪ Process
▸ Data that may be used
▸ Review by others
▪ Principles
▸ Districts that result
5. Who Draws the Plans
▪ No legislators
▪ No appointees of a legislator
▪ No public officials
▪ No politicians
▪ Minority party represented
▪ Equal number from majority & minority
▪ Neutral tie-breaker
6. Illinois
Who Draws the Plans - Legislative
▪ Primary Responsibility - Legislature
▸ Until June 30, 2021
▪ Secondary Responsibility - Commission
▸ If redistricting law not enacted
▸ 8 members appointed by caucus leaders
– 4 legislators
– 4 non-legislators
▸ If no plan filed by August 10
▸ 9th member chosen by lot
– Supreme Court submits two names
– Secretary of State draws one name to chair
7. Limits on Data
▪ No party registration
▸ Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska
▪ No election results
▸ Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska
▪ No socio-economic data
▸ Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska
▪ No incumbent residences
▸ Arizona, California, Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Wyoming
8. Review by Others
▪ Public hearings
▸ Commission states
▸ Iowa
▪ Preliminary plan
▸ Commission states
▸ Iowa
▪ Judicial review
▸ Colorado
▸ Florida
▸ Kansas
9. Limits on Districts that Result
Districting Principles for 2010s Plans
▪ Populations equal - 50 states
▪ Territory contiguous - 50 states
▪ Territory compact - 38 states
▪ Political subdivisions preserved - 46 states
▪ Communities of interest preserved - 22
▪ Minorities fairly represented - 27 states
10. Limits on Districts that Result
Districting Principles for 2010s Plans
▪ House districts nested in Senate - 17 states
▪ Cores of prior districts preserved - 12 states
▪ Not favor party or incumbent - 12 states
▪ Avoid contests between incumbents - 7
▪ Politically competitive - 2 states
11. Illinois
Const. Art. IV, § 3
▸“Legislative districts shall be compact,
contiguous and substantially equal in
population.”
13. Voting Rights Act § 2
▪ Not deny or abridge the right to vote on
account of:
▸ Race or color
▸ Membership in a language minority group
– Spanish heritage
– American Indian or Alaskan Native
– Asian American
14. Voting Rights Act § 2
▪ No Discriminatory Effect
▪ Thornburg v. Gingles - Three Preconditions
▸ Minority Population Sufficiently Large and
Geographically Compact
▸ Minority is Politically Cohesive
▸ Bloc Voting by White Majority Usually Defeats
Minority’s Preferred Candidate
▪ Totality of the Circumstances
▪ Draw Districts the Minority has a Fair Chance
to Win
15. Drawing Minority Districts
An Effective Voting Majority
▪ A realistic opportunity to elect
▸ More than a simple majority?
– 65%?
– Packing?
▸ Less than a simple majority?
– Crossover districts
– Coalition districts
▪ Ten years of election history
▸ Endogenous elections (same office)
▸ Exogenous elections (other offices)
▸ Biracial contests
16. Voting Rights Act § 5
▪ “Covered Jurisdictions”
▪ Preclearance
▸ U.S. Department of Justice
▸ U.S. District Court for District of Columbia
▪ Do Not Retrogress
▸ Ability to Elect a Candidate of Choice
▪ Do Not Intend to Discriminate
▪ You Need Not Maximize the Number of
Majority-Minority Districts
38. Traditional Districting Principles
▪ Contiguous Territory
▪ Compact
▪ Preserve Political Subdivisions
▪ Preserve Communities of Interest
▪ Protect Incumbents
▸ Preserve Cores of Prior Districts
▸ Avoid Contests Between Incumbents
39. Strict Scrutiny
▪ A Compelling Governmental Interest
▪ Narrowly Tailored to Achieve that Interest
▸ Remedying Past Discrimination
▸ Avoiding Retrogression Under VRA § 5
▸ Avoiding a Violation of VRA § 2
41. Partisan Gerrymandering
Can It Be Proved?
▪ Davis v. Bandemer (1986)
▸ Intentional discrimination against an identifiable
group
▸ Discriminatory effect
– “electoral system . . . will consistently degrade . . . a group
of voters’ influence on the political process as a whole”
42. Partisan Gerrymandering
Can It Be Proved?
▪ Vieth v. Jubelier (2004)
▸ Stevens
– Partisan purposes predominated over traditional districting
principles
▸ Souter
– Paid no heed to traditional districting principles where
drawing boundaries around party’s voters
▸ Breyer
– Traditional districting principles not followed
– Party with minority of votes statewide wins a majority of
seats
43. Partisan Gerrymandering
Can It Be Proved?
▪ LULAC v. Perry (2006)
▸ Plaintiffs
– Mid-decade redistricting was invalid because its sole
objective was partisan gain
44. Florida
Fair Districts Amendment (2010)
▪ Tier-One Principles
▸ Not favor or disfavor political party or incumbent
▸ Not discriminate against racial or language
minorities
▸ Contiguous territory
▪ Tier-Two Principles
▸ Equal population
▸ Compact territory
▸ Use existing political and geographic boundaries
45. Florida
In re: Senate Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176
(2012)
▪ Numbering scheme rejected
▸ Favored incumbents
▪ 8 Senate districts rejected
▸ Violation of tier-two principles
– Not compact
– Did not use existing political or geographic boundaries
▸ Was evidence of intent to violate tier-one principles
– 8 of 8 to favor incumbent
– 4 of 8 to favor a political party
46. Better Maps for Illinois
Peter S. Wattson
Redistricting Conference
Paul Simon Public Policy Institute
Springfield, Illinois
April 30, 2013
How to Draw Redistricting Plans That Will Stand Up in Court
http://paulsimoninstitute.org/