The document summarizes the behavior and ecology of butterflyfishes, which are small-bodied reef fish found in tropical oceans worldwide. Butterflyfishes form monogamous pairs that maintain long-term territorial bonds, despite showing no parental care. They patrol and defend their territories aggressively against intruders. While considered largely territorial, some debate remains around niche partitioning and whether territoriality varies by location. More recent research is needed to address unanswered questions about their social behaviors.
migration and dispersal are most popular terminology in bio-geographical context. Those processes help us to understand how species spread all over the earth.
migration and dispersal are most popular terminology in bio-geographical context. Those processes help us to understand how species spread all over the earth.
This is a brief overview of the type of zoogeographic distributions of animals, such as cosmopolitan, discontinuous, endemic, isolated, and bipolar distributions.
Habitat is a fundamental niche which refers to the multidimensional space with proximate factors. Habitat provides shelter, food, protection, mates, space for breeding, feeding, resting, roosting, courtship, grooming, sleeping etc.
Maddison D.R., Moore W., Baker M.D., Ellis T.M., Ober K.A., Cannone J.J., and Gutell R.R. (2009).
Monophyly of terrestrial adephagan beetles as indicated by three nuclear genes (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Trachypachidae).
Zoologica Scripta, 38(1):43-62.
This is a brief overview of the type of zoogeographic distributions of animals, such as cosmopolitan, discontinuous, endemic, isolated, and bipolar distributions.
Habitat is a fundamental niche which refers to the multidimensional space with proximate factors. Habitat provides shelter, food, protection, mates, space for breeding, feeding, resting, roosting, courtship, grooming, sleeping etc.
Maddison D.R., Moore W., Baker M.D., Ellis T.M., Ober K.A., Cannone J.J., and Gutell R.R. (2009).
Monophyly of terrestrial adephagan beetles as indicated by three nuclear genes (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Trachypachidae).
Zoologica Scripta, 38(1):43-62.
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...Angelo Mark Walag
Echinoderms are fundamentally good indicators of health and status of coralline communities in marine waters. In this study, the diversity and distribution of echinoderm species were determined in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Misamis Oriental. In total, 387 individuals were collected coming from classes Echinoidea, Holothuroidea, Asteroidea, and Ophiuroidea. The majority of individuals collected were Protoreaster nodusus, which is a good indicator of reef health while the least abundant echinoderm species was Acanthaster planci. The pattern of distribution of majority of echinoderms was a clumped distribution while the other groups followed regular/uniform distribution, which may be due to limited dispersal ability and availability and available food sources. Moderate species diversity was also observed and species were rather similar in abundance, shown by the evenness index. This suggests good marine health, even under the threat of gleaning activities, active fishing, and habitat destruction. It is recommended that follow-up studies are conducted especially regarding monitoring of echinoderm species, to further assess the health of the intertidal zone in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Misamis Oriental.
The costs and benefits of kleptoparasitism in frigatebirds: An integrative re...AI Publications
Kleptoparasitism is a foraging strategy that involves stealing food from other animals. Frigatebirds are seabirds that are known to engage in kleptoparasitism, especially on other nesting seabirds such as boobies and tropicbirds. This paper reviews the kleptoparasitic behavior of frigatebirds, focusing on the factors that influence its occurrence, frequency and success. The ecological and evolutionary implications of kleptoparasitism for frigatebirds and their prey is also assessed. The paper draws on evidence from various studies conducted in different regions of the world, including the Indian Ocean, the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea. The review indicates that kleptoparasitism is a complex and dynamic behavior that reflects the interactions between frigatebirds and their environment.
A ray of hope in the darkness: What we have learned from Yangtze giant soft-s...AbdullaAlAsif1
The Swinhoe's softshell turtle, Rafetus swinhoei (Gray, 1873),) is one of the world's largest freshwater turtles, and possibly the most endangered turtle species on the planet (Stanford et al., 2018). It has an overall length of over 100 cm and a width of up to 70 cm, and it can easily weigh up to 70–100 kg, maximum weight was recorded at 169 kg (Solimine, 2013; Trong, 2018). Despite its enormous size and unusual look, this species is incredibly secretive and only comes to the surface to breathe, preferring to remain submerged deep down. For this species, there is very little ecological information, and the remaining distribution is unclear. This could explain why it's so difficult to positively identify and confirm occurrences of this species in the wild (Trong, 2018). If we look back to the history and biogeography of this species, it can be found that the existential records were documented in the historical literature of the Chinese and Vietnamese dynasties. This species was once thought to only live along the Red River in China and Vietnam, as well as the lower Yangtze River floodplain in China, but its current population size is estimated to be just one wild individual of undetermined sex and a solitary captivity male in Suzhou Zoo, China. Although recent thorough searches in Yunnan, China, and Vietnam failed to confirm the presence of more wild specimens, some sightings were reported until around a decade ago (Stanford et al., 2018), giving hope that more individuals may yet exist in Vietnam.
A Critical Review of the Female Gametophyte in the Podostemaceae - Past, Pres...QUESTJOURNAL
ABSTRACT: Anoverview of the habit and habitat of Podostemaceae is briefly discussed. Then,the paper attempts to review the past and present female gametophyte studies in the Podostemaceae. It trace the course and major achievements during the megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis and embryogenesis studies in the Podostemaceae. The evolutionary and functional significance of polarity during two-nucleate stage division of the megagametogenesis is discussed. Antipodal cell in the organized female gametophyte is discussed. Possible courses and causes of single fertilization and nucellar plasmodium organization are suggested. Then, provides and points out areas of special attention and limitations in the study of female gametophyte in future. Attempts are made to relate the ontogenies found in the family to plants with similar single fertilization phenomenon, for example Spinacia and Oenothera. Their embryological significances in the development of the female gametophyte in the angiosperms and gymnosperms are discussed
Diversity of Soil Fauna and Ecosystem Function tariqulmasud12
Soils are natural resources of utmost. Importance for a number of ecosystem and biosphere processes such as plant production, cycling of organic matter and nutrients, storage of C and water, and release of nitrous oxides, CO2 and methane. Soil degradation, through various processes, is a matter of great concern, since their integrity is absolutely critical to increasing food production (FAO, 1995), and regulating atmospheric fluxes of greenhouse gases (Jenkinson, 199 1 ; Wallace, 1994).
1. Cody Gramlin
0028526174
FNR 20100
Behavior and Ecology of Chaetodontidae
The family Chaetodontidae, also known as the butterflyfishes, consists of 129
species from 12 genera (Nelson 2016). Butterflyfishes can be found in areas such as
the Red Sea, Eastern Pacific, Western Atlantic, and most concentrated in the Indo-
Pacific regions especially between southern Japan and the Great Barrier Reef (Findley
and Findley 1985). They are generally small-bodied, ranging from 12 to 22 centimeters,
and contain a rich mixture of contrasting white, yellow, orange, and black colors (Nelson
2016). Butterflyfishes generally live in temperate or tropical regions on or near coral
reefs. They reach sexual maturity generally around 90-100mm of length or about one
year of age. Spawning seasons occur between the winter and spring months for many
species in the family (Ralston 1981). They tend to have a primarily corallivorous diet,
preferring stony and soft corals alike, as well as other small, benthic invertebrates and
algae (Roberts and Ormond 1992; Ralston 1981; Findley and Findley 1985). As of
1994, chaetodontids were listed as a vulnerable family to the possibility of extinction
(Nelson 2016). Important topics to discuss aside from the general characteristics that
define the majority of butterflyfishes include their unique pairing habits and territoriality.
Most butterflyfish species are monogamous species, where a single female will
mate with a single male for its entire life and breed through external fertilization. Despite
this, butterflyfishes show no parental care of eggs or larvae. This results in planktonic
2. larvae which aid in the distribution and settlement of new areas. This contradicts the
high parental care typically associated with monogamy (Driscoll and Driscoll 1988). This
implies that monogamy among butterflyfishes may have evolved for reasons other than
parental care (Fricke 1986; Roberts and Ormond 1992). Pairs of butterflyfishes rely
greatly on the bond between themselves and their mates and generally stay within a
close proximity to them. More often than not, these pairs not only retain a close
distance, but remain within each other’s line of sight while grazing in their territory as
well (Tricas 1989; Roberts and Ormond 1992). Many of the bonds formed between pairs
of butterflyfishes can be quite long-term. In a study conducted off the coast of Hawaii by
Driscoll and Driscoll (1988), the greater percentage of pairs observed (Chaetodon
multicinctus, C. quadrimaculatus and C. ornatissimus) remained together throughout
their seven-month study. Upon returning to the site a year later, individuals from five of
the eight original pairs of C. ornatissimus were easily recognizable as well as five of the
six original pairs of C. quadrimaculatus. All could be found in the same territorial bounds
as the prior year. Other experts from similar studies have found the same pairs
observed even three or more years later, highlighting the strength these mating bonds
can truly hold (Roberts and Ormond 1992; Fricke 1986; Driscoll and Driscoll 1988;
Hourigan 1989).
Territoriality displayed among these fish is typically intraspecific, with little to no
interspecific territoriality (Driscoll and Driscoll 1988). Mature adults retain well-defined
territorial boundaries and are aware of other pairs’ territory locations. Large areas of
reefs are subdivided into multiple territories which newer mates are quick to learn
(Righton and Mills 2007; Tricas 1989). Generally, these territorial boundaries are even
3. shaped well enough to construct a detailed map of local chaetodontid territories.
Though pairs generally patrol their territory borders, a mutual understanding of
ownership exists among separate pairs and few aggressive interactions occur (Driscoll
and Driscoll 1988; Fricke 1986). Most territorial interactions were observed from pairs
defending against young, single invaders, or small aggregates of the same species. The
aggression shown consists primarily of chasing activity and rarely lasts more than a
short moment (Tricas 1989). An important characteristic to note is that butterflyfishes
are also known to only show aggression to those of the same gender (Fricke 1986;
Hourigan 1988).
Butterflyfishes retain unique social structures regarding territory boarders and
location. Though the majority of experts are in agreement with the conclusion that
butterflyfishes can indeed be considered territorial, most literature on butterflyfishes
dates back to the 1980’s and 1990’s. Many questions are still left unanswered or up for
debate. For instance, much is still unknown about niche partitioning or how different
coral resources are used among chaetodontid species. For another example, why do
some experts believe that chaetodontids are entirely non-territorial while others have
recorded actual observations of this occurring? Is this discrepancy a result of human
error, related to location, or maybe another lurking variable? With this in mind, it may be
time to conduct more research to follow up on the current knowledge of this socially
complex family of fishes.
Word count: 759
4. Literature Cited
Driscoll, J.W., and J.L. Driscoll. 1988. Pair behavior and spacing in butterflyfishes
(Chaetodontidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 22(1): 29-37.
Findley, J.S., and M.T. Findley. 1985. A search for pattern in butterflyfish
communities. The American Naturalist 126(6): 800-816.
Fricke, H.W. 1986. Pair swimming and mutual partner guarding in monogamous
butterflyfish (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): a joint advertisement for territory. Ethology 73(4):
307-333.
Hourigan, T.F. 1988. Environmental determinants of butterflyfish social systems.
Environmental Biology of Fishes 25(1): 61-78.
Irons, D.K. 1989. Temporal and areal feeding behavior of the butterflyfish,
Chaetodon trifascialis, at Johnston Atoll. Environmental Biology of Fishes 9: 187-194.
Nelson, J.S. 2016. Family Chaetodontidae – Butterflyfishes. Retrieved from
FishBase.
Ralston S. 1981. Aspects of the reproductive biology and feeding ecology of
Chaetodon miliaris, a Hawaiian endemic butterflyfish. Environmental Biology of Fishes
6(2): 167-176.
Righton, D., and C. Mills. 2007. Application of GIS to investigate the use of space
in coral reef fish: a comparison of territorial behaviour in two Red Sea butterflyfishes.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(2): 215-232.
5. Roberts, C.M., and R.F.G. Ormond. 1992. Butterflyfish social behaviuor, with
special reference to the incidence of territoriality: a review. Environmental Biology of
Fishes 34(1): 79-93.
Tricas, T.C. 1989. Determinants of feeding territory size in the corallivorous
butterflyfish, Chaetodon multicintus. Animal Behaviour 37(5): 830-841.
Yabuta, S. 2002. Uncertainty in partner recognition and tail-up display in a
monogamous butterflyfish. Animal Behaviour 63(1): 165-173.
Yabuta, S. 1997. Spawning migrations in the monogamous butterflyfish,
Chaetodon trifasciatus. Ichthyological Research 44(2): 177-182.
Zekeria, Z.A., Y. Dawit, S. Ghebremedhin, M. Naser, and J.J. Videler. 2002.
Resource partitioning among four butterflyfish species in the Red Sea. Marine &
Freshwater Research 53(2): 63-68.