SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Explain how the BBFC deals with 4 issues which are of concern to the general public.

There are many different issues the BBFC must deal with when classifying films. These include
violence, drugs, language and sex references. These different issues are evaluated by the BBFC and it
determines whether the film will be classified at a U, PG, 12, 15 or an 18 rating.

Violence is an issue that most often defines the category for a film. The BBFC must remember that
when evaluating the violent content of a film aimed at a younger audience, that violence is a part of
children’s culture with TV programmes such as ‘Tom and Jerry’. Impressionistic violence in a film
means a lot of it is just implied. An example of this would be the torture scene in ‘Casino Royale’ as
the contact isn’t actually seen therefore this film can be put at a 12. But once violent contact can be
seen the rating moves up to a 15 and this is apparent in the film ‘Die Hard’ in which a male and
female character fight quite viciously in a scene. Violence in this film is one of the main reasons why
its rating is a 15. Also, blood is generally a good indicator for a high level of violence and emphasis on
this can take a film up to a 15 rating. ‘The Last King of Scotland’ rating of 15 caused controversy
because of its lengthy and brutal torture scene that includes hooks being put into a man’s chest. The
reason the BBFC decided to put this film at a 15 is because of the context the torture is in. The plot
of the film is a true story and so based on true events. It dramatises real life. This is a lot different to
the context of torture for an 18. Films that contain violence worthy of an 18 rating is usually because
of the build up to someone being injured, the dwelling on infliction of pain and how the violence can
move away from the plot of the film. A key example of this would be the ‘Saw’ films where the
violence is gratuitous.

Another issue the BBFC deal with when classifying films is drugs. As the BBFC guidelines are greatly
influenced by the public and what they believe is acceptable, drugs are a key area in which parents
in particular want the BBFC to be careful with. As soon as people can be seen taking drugs the rating
for the film automatically goes to either a 15 or an 18 depending on other elements of the film. Films
cannot glamorise drugs. For example, films are able to show drugs being taken at a party in a ‘fun’
atmosphere so to speak. But it must be balanced out with a negative at some point, i.e. someone’s
downfall as a drug addict. For instance, the film ‘Trainspotting’ has a plot solely based around the
lives of drug addicts. This film is an 18 because there are several detailed scenes of heroin abuse
throughout the work. There are close-ups of heroin being heated on a spoon and sucked into a
syringe, detail of the tying of tourniquets around arms in order to raise veins for easier injection and,
in the strongest scene, an extreme close-up of a needle puncturing the lead character’s skin. The
strong drug content however was allowed by the BBFC as it shows the downside to drugs and didn’t
glamorise the addiction.

Parallel to drug use, language is an issue which the BBFC say the public feel strongly about. A rating
below a 12 must not contain any use of strong language. ‘Billy Elliot’ is an example which some
might say its 15 rating is a bit too high considering the plot of the film. However, there are frequent
uses of strong language in this film and the BBFC had no choice but to put its rating to a 15. The ‘f-
word’ and ‘c-word’ in particular are examples of language that will automatically put a film up to a
15 or 18 rating – even if it is only said once. Determining whether the language is worthy of a 15 or
an 18 rating does depend a lot on the context in which it is said. For example, ‘Four Weddings and A
Funeral’ has a 15 rating because in the first scene the dialect is largely dominated by bad language. It
is however said in a comical way and isn’t intimidating or aggressively directed at a character and
this then makes it acceptable for a 15 classification.

Finally, sex references are another issue the BBFC must deal with when classifying films. Nowadays,
guidelines are a lot more liberal when it comes to sex in films – especially in higher categories. 12A
sex references shouldn’t go beyond what children would know and sexual innuendos are acceptable
as parents may understand but children won’t. The allowance of nudity changes throughout
different cultures but nudity is acceptable for U and PG rated films as long as it is natural and not
sexualised. Sex in films has to be contextually justified. An example of this is ‘Monster’s Ball’ which is
rated a 15. Despite the sex scene in this being fairly lengthy, the scene is in context and is important
to the plot so is therefore acceptable. The film ‘9 Songs’ which was released in 2004 was classified as
an 18 by the BBFC. Despite guidelines saying films must not be pornographic, this film did contain
several minutes of real sex. After much debate it was decided that the sex within the film was
contextually justified which allowed the film to enter circulation at an 18. Many complaints were
however made about this decision by the BBFC.

To conclude, the BBFC have to deal with many different issues when classifying a film. It is essential
that films that enter circulation are appropriately rated because younger viewers mustn’t see
anything imitable and that could be classed as harmful. In particular drug use and acts of violence
are the driving point of determining a film’s classification as is requested by the public who heavily
influence the BBFC’s guidelines.

More Related Content

What's hot

The BBFC
The BBFCThe BBFC
The BBFC
karliex
 
Bbfc classifications (research)
Bbfc classifications (research)Bbfc classifications (research)
Bbfc classifications (research)
Ryparsnips
 
Bbfc classifications research
Bbfc classifications researchBbfc classifications research
Bbfc classifications research
Shaun Hardwick
 
Secondary audience research
Secondary audience researchSecondary audience research
Secondary audience researchbenwhite16
 
Certificate ratings bbfc
Certificate ratings  bbfcCertificate ratings  bbfc
Certificate ratings bbfchibaqyasmin
 
Regulation
RegulationRegulation
Regulation
fingu
 
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...
11whiste
 
BBFC
BBFCBBFC
Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
British board of film classication (bbfc)
British board of film classication (bbfc)British board of film classication (bbfc)
British board of film classication (bbfc)haverstockmedia
 
Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
Bbfc
mxnique
 
Bbfc Classification
Bbfc ClassificationBbfc Classification
Bbfc ClassificationCissnei
 
Audience Age Restrictions
Audience Age RestrictionsAudience Age Restrictions
Audience Age Restrictions
rolosumm
 
The bBFC
The bBFCThe bBFC
The bBFC
mediastudiesH9
 
Presentation on age in film
Presentation on age in filmPresentation on age in film
Presentation on age in filmolliedwyer
 
The bbfc
The bbfcThe bbfc

What's hot (19)

The BBFC
The BBFCThe BBFC
The BBFC
 
Bbfc classifications (research)
Bbfc classifications (research)Bbfc classifications (research)
Bbfc classifications (research)
 
Bbfc classifications research
Bbfc classifications researchBbfc classifications research
Bbfc classifications research
 
Secondary audience research
Secondary audience researchSecondary audience research
Secondary audience research
 
Certificate ratings bbfc
Certificate ratings  bbfcCertificate ratings  bbfc
Certificate ratings bbfc
 
Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
Bbfc
 
BBFC
BBFCBBFC
BBFC
 
Regulation
RegulationRegulation
Regulation
 
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for your media product? - S...
 
BBFC
BBFCBBFC
BBFC
 
Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
Bbfc
 
British board of film classication (bbfc)
British board of film classication (bbfc)British board of film classication (bbfc)
British board of film classication (bbfc)
 
Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
Bbfc
 
Bbfc Classification
Bbfc ClassificationBbfc Classification
Bbfc Classification
 
Audience Age Restrictions
Audience Age RestrictionsAudience Age Restrictions
Audience Age Restrictions
 
The bBFC
The bBFCThe bBFC
The bBFC
 
Presentation on age in film
Presentation on age in filmPresentation on age in film
Presentation on age in film
 
BBFC
BBFCBBFC
BBFC
 
The bbfc
The bbfcThe bbfc
The bbfc
 

Viewers also liked

Mc Unavueltaporelmundo
Mc UnavueltaporelmundoMc Unavueltaporelmundo
Mc Unavueltaporelmundo
guest8b5f49
 
Carteles 5 grado ves.
Carteles 5 grado ves.Carteles 5 grado ves.
Carteles 5 grado ves.arianna
 
Fenomenul Open Source
Fenomenul Open SourceFenomenul Open Source
Fenomenul Open Source
adispiac
 
ABC's by Elli
ABC's by ElliABC's by Elli
ABC's by Elli
emoryylewman99
 
A-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of Allusion
A-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of AllusionA-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of Allusion
A-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of Allusion
Paul Wozney
 
Playa De Las Catedrales
Playa De Las CatedralesPlaya De Las Catedrales
Playa De Las CatedralesTere
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Mc Unavueltaporelmundo
Mc UnavueltaporelmundoMc Unavueltaporelmundo
Mc Unavueltaporelmundo
 
Carteles 5 grado ves.
Carteles 5 grado ves.Carteles 5 grado ves.
Carteles 5 grado ves.
 
Fenomenul Open Source
Fenomenul Open SourceFenomenul Open Source
Fenomenul Open Source
 
ABC's by Elli
ABC's by ElliABC's by Elli
ABC's by Elli
 
A-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of Allusion
A-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of AllusionA-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of Allusion
A-Lose-ion Yourself: A Introduction to the LIterary Device of Allusion
 
Playa De Las Catedrales
Playa De Las CatedralesPlaya De Las Catedrales
Playa De Las Catedrales
 

Similar to BBFC

Bbfc post
Bbfc postBbfc post
Bbfc post
Rhiannon99
 
L04 regulating bodies
L04   regulating bodiesL04   regulating bodies
L04 regulating bodies
ShamareCampbell1
 
BBFC Ratings
BBFC Ratings BBFC Ratings
BBFC Ratings
EmmaWeeksMedia
 
British board of film classification
British board of film classificationBritish board of film classification
British board of film classification
ksanchez9876
 
Bbfc research
Bbfc researchBbfc research
Bbfc research
charleysgroup
 
BBFC
BBFC BBFC
L04 regulating bodies
L04   regulating bodiesL04   regulating bodies
L04 regulating bodies
ShamareCampbell1
 
BBFC Research
BBFC ResearchBBFC Research
BBFC Research
tlcurtis
 
British Board of Film Classification
British Board of Film ClassificationBritish Board of Film Classification
British Board of Film Classification
Jak Main
 
Fight club & juno audience theory
Fight club & juno audience theory Fight club & juno audience theory
Fight club & juno audience theory SarahMurrayy
 
Bbfc research
Bbfc researchBbfc research
Bbfc research
charleysgroup
 
Audience research
Audience researchAudience research
Audience researchkatherine93
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
haverstockmedia
 
Giulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studies
Giulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studiesGiulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studies
Giulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studies
EsmeCollins1
 
Bbcf
BbcfBbcf
BBFC Research Task
BBFC Research TaskBBFC Research Task
BBFC Research TaskJack Cooper
 

Similar to BBFC (20)

Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
Bbfc
 
Bbfc
BbfcBbfc
Bbfc
 
Bbfc post
Bbfc postBbfc post
Bbfc post
 
L04 regulating bodies
L04   regulating bodiesL04   regulating bodies
L04 regulating bodies
 
BBFC Ratings
BBFC Ratings BBFC Ratings
BBFC Ratings
 
British board of film classification
British board of film classificationBritish board of film classification
British board of film classification
 
Bbfc research
Bbfc researchBbfc research
Bbfc research
 
BBFC
BBFC BBFC
BBFC
 
L04 regulating bodies
L04   regulating bodiesL04   regulating bodies
L04 regulating bodies
 
BBFC Research
BBFC ResearchBBFC Research
BBFC Research
 
British Board of Film Classification
British Board of Film ClassificationBritish Board of Film Classification
British Board of Film Classification
 
Fight club & juno audience theory
Fight club & juno audience theory Fight club & juno audience theory
Fight club & juno audience theory
 
Bbfc research
Bbfc researchBbfc research
Bbfc research
 
Audience research
Audience researchAudience research
Audience research
 
Audience research
Audience researchAudience research
Audience research
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
BBFC
BBFCBBFC
BBFC
 
Giulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studies
Giulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studiesGiulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studies
Giulia aarsman aulino - media regulation film case studies
 
Bbcf
BbcfBbcf
Bbcf
 
BBFC Research Task
BBFC Research TaskBBFC Research Task
BBFC Research Task
 

More from bethfussey

Finished Digipak
Finished DigipakFinished Digipak
Finished Digipakbethfussey
 
Screenshot of Video
Screenshot of VideoScreenshot of Video
Screenshot of Videobethfussey
 
Video Screenshot
Video ScreenshotVideo Screenshot
Video Screenshotbethfussey
 
Twitter on Website
Twitter on WebsiteTwitter on Website
Twitter on Websitebethfussey
 
Website Progress
Website ProgressWebsite Progress
Website Progressbethfussey
 
BBFC Guidelines Notes
BBFC Guidelines NotesBBFC Guidelines Notes
BBFC Guidelines Notesbethfussey
 

More from bethfussey (20)

Digipak Draft
Digipak DraftDigipak Draft
Digipak Draft
 
Website Draft
Website DraftWebsite Draft
Website Draft
 
Digipak Draft
Digipak DraftDigipak Draft
Digipak Draft
 
Q2
Q2Q2
Q2
 
Q4
Q4Q4
Q4
 
Finished Digipak
Finished DigipakFinished Digipak
Finished Digipak
 
Finished digi
Finished digiFinished digi
Finished digi
 
T shirts
T shirtsT shirts
T shirts
 
T shirts
T shirtsT shirts
T shirts
 
Screenshot of Video
Screenshot of VideoScreenshot of Video
Screenshot of Video
 
Video Screenshot
Video ScreenshotVideo Screenshot
Video Screenshot
 
Twitter on Website
Twitter on WebsiteTwitter on Website
Twitter on Website
 
Screenshot
ScreenshotScreenshot
Screenshot
 
Website Progress
Website ProgressWebsite Progress
Website Progress
 
Digipak Font
Digipak FontDigipak Font
Digipak Font
 
Work so far
Work so farWork so far
Work so far
 
Work So Far
Work So FarWork So Far
Work So Far
 
BBFC Guidelines Notes
BBFC Guidelines NotesBBFC Guidelines Notes
BBFC Guidelines Notes
 
Costume
CostumeCostume
Costume
 
Costume
CostumeCostume
Costume
 

BBFC

  • 1. Explain how the BBFC deals with 4 issues which are of concern to the general public. There are many different issues the BBFC must deal with when classifying films. These include violence, drugs, language and sex references. These different issues are evaluated by the BBFC and it determines whether the film will be classified at a U, PG, 12, 15 or an 18 rating. Violence is an issue that most often defines the category for a film. The BBFC must remember that when evaluating the violent content of a film aimed at a younger audience, that violence is a part of children’s culture with TV programmes such as ‘Tom and Jerry’. Impressionistic violence in a film means a lot of it is just implied. An example of this would be the torture scene in ‘Casino Royale’ as the contact isn’t actually seen therefore this film can be put at a 12. But once violent contact can be seen the rating moves up to a 15 and this is apparent in the film ‘Die Hard’ in which a male and female character fight quite viciously in a scene. Violence in this film is one of the main reasons why its rating is a 15. Also, blood is generally a good indicator for a high level of violence and emphasis on this can take a film up to a 15 rating. ‘The Last King of Scotland’ rating of 15 caused controversy because of its lengthy and brutal torture scene that includes hooks being put into a man’s chest. The reason the BBFC decided to put this film at a 15 is because of the context the torture is in. The plot of the film is a true story and so based on true events. It dramatises real life. This is a lot different to the context of torture for an 18. Films that contain violence worthy of an 18 rating is usually because of the build up to someone being injured, the dwelling on infliction of pain and how the violence can move away from the plot of the film. A key example of this would be the ‘Saw’ films where the violence is gratuitous. Another issue the BBFC deal with when classifying films is drugs. As the BBFC guidelines are greatly influenced by the public and what they believe is acceptable, drugs are a key area in which parents in particular want the BBFC to be careful with. As soon as people can be seen taking drugs the rating for the film automatically goes to either a 15 or an 18 depending on other elements of the film. Films cannot glamorise drugs. For example, films are able to show drugs being taken at a party in a ‘fun’ atmosphere so to speak. But it must be balanced out with a negative at some point, i.e. someone’s downfall as a drug addict. For instance, the film ‘Trainspotting’ has a plot solely based around the lives of drug addicts. This film is an 18 because there are several detailed scenes of heroin abuse throughout the work. There are close-ups of heroin being heated on a spoon and sucked into a syringe, detail of the tying of tourniquets around arms in order to raise veins for easier injection and, in the strongest scene, an extreme close-up of a needle puncturing the lead character’s skin. The strong drug content however was allowed by the BBFC as it shows the downside to drugs and didn’t glamorise the addiction. Parallel to drug use, language is an issue which the BBFC say the public feel strongly about. A rating below a 12 must not contain any use of strong language. ‘Billy Elliot’ is an example which some might say its 15 rating is a bit too high considering the plot of the film. However, there are frequent uses of strong language in this film and the BBFC had no choice but to put its rating to a 15. The ‘f- word’ and ‘c-word’ in particular are examples of language that will automatically put a film up to a 15 or 18 rating – even if it is only said once. Determining whether the language is worthy of a 15 or an 18 rating does depend a lot on the context in which it is said. For example, ‘Four Weddings and A Funeral’ has a 15 rating because in the first scene the dialect is largely dominated by bad language. It
  • 2. is however said in a comical way and isn’t intimidating or aggressively directed at a character and this then makes it acceptable for a 15 classification. Finally, sex references are another issue the BBFC must deal with when classifying films. Nowadays, guidelines are a lot more liberal when it comes to sex in films – especially in higher categories. 12A sex references shouldn’t go beyond what children would know and sexual innuendos are acceptable as parents may understand but children won’t. The allowance of nudity changes throughout different cultures but nudity is acceptable for U and PG rated films as long as it is natural and not sexualised. Sex in films has to be contextually justified. An example of this is ‘Monster’s Ball’ which is rated a 15. Despite the sex scene in this being fairly lengthy, the scene is in context and is important to the plot so is therefore acceptable. The film ‘9 Songs’ which was released in 2004 was classified as an 18 by the BBFC. Despite guidelines saying films must not be pornographic, this film did contain several minutes of real sex. After much debate it was decided that the sex within the film was contextually justified which allowed the film to enter circulation at an 18. Many complaints were however made about this decision by the BBFC. To conclude, the BBFC have to deal with many different issues when classifying a film. It is essential that films that enter circulation are appropriately rated because younger viewers mustn’t see anything imitable and that could be classed as harmful. In particular drug use and acts of violence are the driving point of determining a film’s classification as is requested by the public who heavily influence the BBFC’s guidelines.