This document discusses a patent infringement case between Bayer and Ajanta regarding Bayer's patent for the drug vardenafil. Some key details: - Bayer was granted a patent in India in 1997 for vardenafil and filed suits against several companies producing generic versions, including Ajanta. - Ajanta argued they should not be subject to an injunction, as Bayer had not worked the patent in India commercially as required by law, by only stating they were "evaluating the market". - The court had to determine if Bayer's non-working of the patent disentitled them to injunctive relief against infringers like Ajanta. This involved interpretation of precedence and balancing patent