During my College Student Development course we were assigned to learn about a particular theory of our choosing to then teach the class. I chose to learn about Baxter Magolda's Epistemology Reflection.
2. Marcia Baxter Magolda
• 1974 B.A Capital University
▫ Major Psychology
▫ Minor Sociology
• 1976 M.A. The Ohio State University
▫ College Student Personnel/ Higher Education
• 1983 Ph. D. The Ohio State University
▫ College Student Personnel/ Higher Education
• Distinguished Professor, Educational Leadership,
Miami University of Ohio
Teaching and advising in the Student Affairs in Higher
Education graduate program
3. The Theory
• Epistemology Reflection
• 5 year longitudinal study at Miami University of
Ohio
• Interview based
▫ 101 students: 51 women, 50 male, 3
underrepresented groups
70 students participated for the full 5 years: 2 from
underrepresented groups
4. The Four Stages
• First Stage: Absolute Knowing
• Second Stage: Transitional Knowing
• Third Stage: Independent Knowing
• Fourth & Final Stage: Contextual Knowing
5. Absolute Knowing
• Knowledge is certain and comes from authorities
• Focus is on the acquisition or achievement of
knowledge
• Evaluation- reproduction of knowledge to
determine accuracy.
6. Two Patterns
Receiving Mastering
• Listening and recording
knowledge to learn
• Students desire
participation in class,
showing instructor interest
and actively “mastering”
material
7. Transitional Knowing
• Movement into by understanding authority can
be unreliable
• Acceptance that some knowledge is uncertain
• Focus is on understanding and processing
knowledge
8. Two Patterns
Interpersonal Impersonal
•Attempting to connect to the
subject, sharing views and linking
one’s perspectives with that of
others. Especially within
uncertainty.
•Focus more on their own
perspectives and defending their
opinions. More likely to separate
self from others and the subject
matter.
9. Independent Knowing
• Knowledge is viewed as mostly uncertain
• Thinking for yourself and creating individualized
truths
• Establishing and understanding subjective
points of view
11. Contextual Knowing
• Identifying criteria in which to make choices
• Knowledge exists in a context and is judged on
evidence compared to the context
12. Strengths and Criticisms
Strengths Criticisms
• Guided interviews allowed key
influence discussion with
students sharing experiences
and the meaning they made
• Applications within higher
education
• On going study- lead to the
development of her Self-
Authorship theory
• Leaned toward testing theories
of Perry and Belenky in
beginning of research study
• Students of color represented
only 3% of population
• Frame of the study as a study
about learning
13. Interesting Information
• Learning in the Whole House.
▫ Keynote address, Kent State University October,
2009
• Dr. Baxter Magolda teaches student
development theory
14. References
Baxter Magolda, M. (2004). Evolution of a Constuctivist Conceptualization of
Epistemology Reflection. Retrieved from
http://citl.indiana.edu/files/pdf/baxter_1.pdf
Evans, N.J., Forney, D.S., Guido, F.M., Patton, L.D., & Renn, K.A. (2010). Student
development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
Baxter Magolda, M. Miami University of Ohio Staff Directory. Retrieved from
http://www.units.miamioh.edu/eap/edl/documents/facultyCV/BaxterMagolda.pdf
Editor's Notes
Personal Epistemology- beliefs about self, learning, classroom instruction, and your sphere of influence specific beliefs are part of personal epistemology
Epistemology Reflection- assumptions about the nature, limits, and certainty of knowledge and how those epistemological assumptions evolve during young adulthood
There are different things that impact how you know what you know. For example: How you as a man or you as a woman can influence how you know what you know.
Epistemology transformation-is a shift to a more complex set of epistemological assumptions rather than gaining particular learning strategies or skills
Intentional in gender balancing as crucial to tracing the role of gender in intellectual development
About 2/3rd of the 101 participants assumed this certainty of knowledge in their first year and half continued this way of knowing during sophomore year
Expectations of this include:
Teachers communicate information clearly so students understand it
Students obtain knowledge from instructors
Peers share material and can explain it to one another
Evaluation means showing the teacher that you have acquired that knowledge
EX: Cut and dried information, right or wrong perspective. Students maintain by memorizing information and then putting that information back down for the teacher to read. (History tests, accounting there is a right answer to a question)
Receiving: Ex: Listening during a lecture and taking notes from an overhead. Asking questions if there is a problem
Mastering: Ex: Desire is active involvement and class participation. The chance to demonstrate knowledge. By asking and answering questions to the professor (authority).
Active involvement did not necessarily indicate more complex ways of knowing
1/3 of interviewees entered college with assumptions more complex than absolute knowing
Perceived knowledge as absolute in some areas but uncertain in others. (transitional knowing to reflect the participants’ transition from certainty to uncertainty
In areas where transitional knowers can interpret that there is a right answer they hold many of the same expectations of absolute knowers
In areas of uncertainty or the absence of a right answer transitional knowers exhibit a shift from acquiring knowledge to understanding it.
Teachers should focus on understanding and application of knowledge
Evaluation: focused on understanding rather than on memorization
Using peers to explore different interpretations
EX: Exploring the idea that there may be more than one right answer to a question or a way to view a case or interpret a story or poem.
Real Life Example: Freshmen year me- In Humanities Literature not being able to understand how to interpret the passages correctly
53% of participants used this way of knowing their sophomore year
83% their junior year
80% their senior year
Interpersonal: Ex: Listening to others students contribute their ideas in class discussion prior to giving input of the student’s own
Impersonal: Ex: Debate and class discussion interests students to help explain and expand their knowledge
Predominate way of knowing for 16% of seniors
There is not a right answer or a wrong answer but a your answer or a my answer
More readily occurred in employment and graduate school contexts
57% using this within the 5th year of interviews
*Struggle can emerge from learning to listen to oneself
EX: Our discussions in the openings of class on interpretations of the theories we have read and our views of how they can apply to our students
Expectations of knowledge changes
Thinking for yourself
Sharing views with peers to expand thinking
Expecting teachers to promote independent thinking and avoid judging student’s opinions
Inter-Individual- listening to peer views for or against an argument and deciding the ultimate credibility and what views should or should not influence personal knowledge
In an argument you hear one side, then the other and can come to a decision of what you think is credible to create your own way of thinking
Individual- Point of view compared with other’s perspectives not created and tweaked by others perspectives
Something you know as a fact may apply differently in different situations
Achieved in graduate school or beyond in employment.
Strengths:
Applications to student affairs
Validating students as knowers is essential to encouraging the development of their voices
Situating learning in the students’ own experiences legitimizes their knowledge as a foundation for constructing new knowledge
Provides a link between the world of student and academic knowledge
Criticisms:
Narrow focus on gender lead to her overlooking race as an influencing factor
Study about learning overlooked important dimensions of development for students that was not apparent (relationships, identity)