The presentation describes the automated process of the system and present a number of applications from sample matrices such as food, polymers, and pharmaceuticals to show the utility of the system.
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Automated Online Extraction and Chromatography with Supercritical Fluids
1. Automated Online Extraction and
Chromatography with Supercritical Fluids
William Hedgepeth, Ken Tanaka
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, Md.
2. Introduction
A new analytical system was released this year which combines online automation of sample
preparation, separation, and analysis.
The system uses supercritical carbon dioxide for the extraction and analysis of target
compounds from a variety of sample matrices.
The system can provide reduced sample preparation times with less solvent waste, while
improving the reproducibility of results.
The poster will describe the automated process of the system and present a number of
applications from sample matrices such as food, polymers, and pharmaceuticals to show the
utility of the system.
3. -73 -23 27 77 127
Temperature
T (°C)
10,000
1,000
100
10
1
Pressure
P(bar)
SFC Review
→ Supercritical CO2 is a fluid state of carbon dioxide where it is held at or
above its critical temperature (31.1 °C) and critical pressure (1,070 psi)
→ Rule-of-thumb: any molecule that
dissolves in methanol (or less polar
solvents) is compatible with SFC
→ CO2 at its critical point is non-polar,
solvent strength is increased by using a
polar co-solvent
→ The benefits of supercritical fluids are
still retained with the addition of co-
solvents that greatly expand the
application range. (subcritical fluid
chromatography)
4. SFC advantages vs LC and GC
• Lower viscosity of the mobile phase
- faster analysis (5 to 10 x faster)
- less pressure drop across the column
- better sensitivity
• Greater separation efficiency than that of HPLC (chiral)
• “Green” technique – reduced organic solvent usage/waste
• Little residual solvent obtained in preparative chromatography
• Analysis of non-volatile, polar or adsorptive solutes without derivatization
• Analysis of thermally labile compounds
• Preparative chromatography
5. System Configuration – SFE-SFC-MS/MS
Online SFE – SFC – MS System
CO2
Pump
Modifier
Pump
Make up solvent
for ionization
MSBPR
Make up
Pump
SFE
Unit
Modifier SolventCO2Cylinder
Column OvenRack
Changer
Splitless
Autosampler
BPR
extraction vessel
LCMS-TQ
(8030/8040/8050/8060)
SFE-30A
LC-30ADSF
SFC-30A
Up to 48
samples
6. Splitless BPR Improves Sensitivity
→ High sensitivity detection
Improved sensitivity due to low dead volume BPR
Splitless injection into the MS without band broadening
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 min
0
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 min
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
10 µg/L
Splitless injection
(Split Ratio: Vent : MS = 8 : 2)
x 5
Make up solvent
MSBPR
Make up
Pump
Column Oven
Splitless
Reserpine
0.5 µg/L
5 µg/L
Make up solvent
MS
BPR
Make up
Pump
Column Oven
Split
Split injection
100,000
200,000
300,000
10 µg/L
Reserpine
0.5 µg/L
5 µg/L
7. Streamlined, On-line Sample Prep
→ SFE (supercritical fluid extraction) sample preparation
Add
absorbent Mix
Fill extraction
vessel
Homogenize
Up to 48 samples can be
extracted and analyzed in
an automated workflow
using the Rack Changer.
→ Conventional sample preparation method (QuEChERS)
Homogenize Add solvent Add reagentStir Stir Centrifuge
Transfer
Supernatant Add reagent Stir Centrifuge
approx. 30 min time saving / samplePatented absorbent effective for dehydration of
samples with high water content
8. Preserves Labile Compounds
Analysis of coenzyme Q10 in supplements
→ Conventional Method: Coenzyme Q10 is prone to oxidation
→ Nexera UC: No oxidation with SFE
Extraction with 5 % MeOH in CO2 for 4 min
Gradient: 5 %B (0 min – 4 min for SFE)
5 % - 50 %B in 5 min
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 min
Solvent extraction:
(sonication in EtOH)
Supplement
Standard
Oxidized
coenzyme Q10
Coenzyme Q10
Oxidized coenzyme Q10
O
O
O
O
H
10
Coenzyme Q10
OH
O
OH
O
H
10
5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 min4.0
Reduced
coenzyme Q10
Supplement
Standard
SFE:
9. DBS Analysis
Analysis of biomarkers from dried blood spot (DBS)
→ Conventional Method: time consuming
→ Nexera UC:
Spot the sample
Cut DBS
Add extraction
solvent
Stir / Shake Soak for 1 h Filtrate Evaporate /
reconstitute
Spot the sample
Cut DBS
Put DBS in
extraction vessel
0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 min
Extraction and analysis of 1 ppm phospholipid
spiked into plasma on DBS
10. Polymer Additives Analysis
Extraction of polymer additives
→ Conventional Method: 10 – 20 h soxhlet extraction
→ Nexera UC: 7 min CO2 extraction
Crushed polymer samples are placed in the extraction vessel
After 7 min CO2 extraction the sample is ready for SFC analysis
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 min
0
200
400
600
800
mAU
Irganox 1010 in
Polypropylene sheet
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 min
0
200
400
600
800
mAU
Irganox 1010 in
Polyethylene film
11. Cleaning Analysis
Cleaning validation
→ Conventional Method:
Sampling – Solvent extraction – Concentration – HPLC analysis
Organic solvents can‘t be used for TOC analysis
→ Nexera UC:
Swab is enclosed in the extraction vessel for SFE
Sampling
Detergent
(Alkylbenzene sulfonate)
Spiked sample
200 µg of detergent
Blank
0 2.5 5.0 min7.5
12. Analysis of API in a Tablet
12
Sample Area
Area converted to
2mg of sample
Recovery (%)
Tablet 2.27mg 4,508,728 3972447.577 100.1
Tablet 2.03mg 3,954,148 3895712.315 98.2
Tablet 2.10mg 4,378,007 4169530.476 105.1
Tablet 1.96mg 3,995,147 4076680.612 102.7
Tablet 2.25mg 4,473,899 3976799.111 100.2
Approx. 2mg of crushed tablet sample was weighed and transferred to the vessel for analysis.
Recovery was calculated by comparing to the standard that is equivalent to the amount of API in
2mg of the tablet.
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 min
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
uV(x1,000,000)
: Skeletal muscle relaxant A STD138 µg
: Skeletal muscle relaxant A Tablet 2.03 mg
8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 min
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
uV(x1,000,000)
13. Summary
A new automated online sample preparation/chromatography system that uses
supercritical fluids was recently introduced.
The system can greatly reduce sample preparation times when compared to
conventional methods like QuEChERS.
Automated supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) can reduce solvent waste while
improving reproducibility of results.
SFE was shown to be a viable technique for a number of applicatons.
14. Thank you for viewing this presentation. Should you have any
questions or require additional information about our research,
products or services, please visit our support page:
http://www.ssi.shimadzu.com/support/.
@shimadzussiFollow us on Twitter
Need More Info?
Editor's Notes
Todays talk will focus on automated SFE sample prep and the benefits gained by using SFC as an analytical technique for testing pesticides in food
Nexera UC Online SFE-SFC system, the benefits of supercritical CO2 for simplifying sample preparation and providing selective chromatography can be realized in a single platform.
Applications including pesticide analysis in agricultural products and infant formula illustrate the ability of automated extraction and analysis to provide comparable results to traditional methods while streamlining workflows
Supercritical fluids are liquids above the critical point.
They have unique properties such as low viscosity that allows high speed chromatography and a high diffusion coefficient that provides good resolution.
SFC is like a hybrid of HPLC and GC.
Carbon dioxide is commonly used because of price and low toxicity and mild conditions to be a supercritical fluid.
Most of SFC is done under subcritical conditions since a modifier is typically used.
However, the benefits of supercritical fluids are still retained.
Less pressure drop across column can lead to extended column lifetimes.
I found that to be the case when working with the amylose and cellulose chiral columns
Greater separation efficiency is useful for working with closely eluting compounds like enantiomers.
Efficiency values between GC and HPLC
Less solvent waste
Less solvent to get rid of in prep chromatography (up to 95% less)
Some typical analytical SFC conditions are shown
Also better to resolve high MW polymers that LC can’t resolve
Here is the complete SFE-SFC system configuration.
You can just include the SFE-30A extraction unit that includes a rack that holds 4 vessels or add the rack changer that holds up to 48 vessels.
The system uses two back pressure regulators that can control how much sample and matrix is deposited onto the column.
Sensitivity gain by not having to split the flow before the MS
Made possible with a low volume BPR
You can increase your sensitivity by a factor of 5
SFE sample prep can help sample flow
homogenize sample
add absorbent for high water content samples if needed and mix
Fill extraction vessel
Compared to catchers, you can save about 30 minutes per sample.
Labile compounds
Comparison of sample prep methods, sonication vs SFE
SFE prevent the oxidation of Coenzyme Q
Additional applications showing phospholipid analysis in dried blood spots
The dried blood spot is simply cut out and placed into the extraction vessel.
Compare to the conventional method above it.
This slide shows extraction of polymer additives
Compare the sample preparation times of SFE vs soxhlet extraction.
7 minutes vs 10 to 20 hours
This slide shows results from a cleaning validation swab.
The swab is simply placed into the extraction vessel for analysis.
The analysis of medicinal ingredient from the tablet by online SFE-SFC
Measurement time from extraction to analysis is possible in a short period of time and within 10 minutes
Area Reproducibility was obtained 3.8% RSD and good results
Recovery is made in the range of 98.2% to 105% , good results were obtained