This document summarizes the results of a survey comparing the opinions of the Irish general public and Irish scientists on various science-related issues. The survey found both similarities and differences in their views. While both groups saw science as having a positive impact, scientists had stronger views on issues like climate change being human-caused and evolution occurring through natural selection. There were also differences in awareness levels, with scientists being more knowledgeable about Irish scientific achievements and better able to name Irish scientists. Overall, the survey aimed to uncover any gaps in perceptions between these groups.
Adverse effects of medical treatment in the UK. Lunevicius R. Grand round, Li...Raimundas Lunevicius
1. Despite gains in reducing mortality from adverse effects (AEs) in the UK, progress has not been achieved in the reduction of incidence from AEs between 1990 and 2013
2. A direct link between deprivation level & health loss from AEs in England & the English regions is apparent, though vary, between most deprived & least deprived
3. DEPRIVATION LEVEL MATTERS on outcomes from AEs.
Presentation given to MICRA (Manchester Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Research on Ageing) by David Sinclair, Head of Policy and Research at the International Longevity Centre - UK. David argues that Universities must get better at engaging with and influencing policy.
Adverse effects of medical treatment in the UK. Lunevicius R. Grand round, Li...Raimundas Lunevicius
1. Despite gains in reducing mortality from adverse effects (AEs) in the UK, progress has not been achieved in the reduction of incidence from AEs between 1990 and 2013
2. A direct link between deprivation level & health loss from AEs in England & the English regions is apparent, though vary, between most deprived & least deprived
3. DEPRIVATION LEVEL MATTERS on outcomes from AEs.
Presentation given to MICRA (Manchester Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Research on Ageing) by David Sinclair, Head of Policy and Research at the International Longevity Centre - UK. David argues that Universities must get better at engaging with and influencing policy.
A poll conducted in March 2013 by the Pew Research Center and Smithsonian magazine to gauge how much the American public knows about general science concepts. One of the questions asks which natural resource is extracted using fracking. Only 51% knew that is it natural gas.
The guide has brought together researchers working in some of the most significant, cutting edge fields. They told us that if policy makers and the public are discouraged by the existence of uncertainty, we miss out on important discussions about the development of new drugs, taking action to mitigate the impact of natural hazards, how to respond to the changing climate and to pandemic threats.
The guide discusses:
- The way scientists use uncertainty to express how confident they are about results.
- That uncertainty can be abused to undermine evidence or to suggest anything could be true: from alternative cancer treatments to anthropogenic CO2 not changing the atmosphere.
- Why uncertainty is not a barrier to taking action – decision makers usually look for a higher level of certainty for an operational decision (such as introducing body scanners in airports) than for a decision based on broader ideology or politics (such as reducing crime rates).
"Enhancing Global Collaborations in Crop Science" GPC Symposium on 4th Nov. 2018 , CSSA/ASA Annual meeting In Baltimore USA.
Ros Gleadow, Monash University, Australia. Knowledge Exchange programmes in Science
Major global survey asks people about their attitudes toward science
A new Wellcome Trust survey asked more than 140,000 people across 140 countries about their attitudes towards science and health, and found that nearly 75% of people say they trust a doctor or a nurse more than friends, family, or other sources of health advice. Here’s more:
•Vaccines: Some 80% of people worldwide agree that vaccines are safe. One in three people in France — the highest percentage anywhere in the world — disagree that vaccines are safe.
•Understanding of science: Men are more likely to claim an understanding than women, as are those aged 29 and younger. Almost two-thirds of people around the world expressed an interest in learning more science.
•Science and society: About a third of people in Africa and Central and South America don’t feel like they benefit from science.
Science, Technology, Engineering
3.1. Describe Goal of technology
3.2. Identify different types of technology: application of science
3.3. Determine how science and technology both positively and negatively influence your life (risk/benefit analysis)
3.4. Describe the scientific solution process
3.5. Describe technology design, explain what a patents are
A poll conducted in March 2013 by the Pew Research Center and Smithsonian magazine to gauge how much the American public knows about general science concepts. One of the questions asks which natural resource is extracted using fracking. Only 51% knew that is it natural gas.
The guide has brought together researchers working in some of the most significant, cutting edge fields. They told us that if policy makers and the public are discouraged by the existence of uncertainty, we miss out on important discussions about the development of new drugs, taking action to mitigate the impact of natural hazards, how to respond to the changing climate and to pandemic threats.
The guide discusses:
- The way scientists use uncertainty to express how confident they are about results.
- That uncertainty can be abused to undermine evidence or to suggest anything could be true: from alternative cancer treatments to anthropogenic CO2 not changing the atmosphere.
- Why uncertainty is not a barrier to taking action – decision makers usually look for a higher level of certainty for an operational decision (such as introducing body scanners in airports) than for a decision based on broader ideology or politics (such as reducing crime rates).
"Enhancing Global Collaborations in Crop Science" GPC Symposium on 4th Nov. 2018 , CSSA/ASA Annual meeting In Baltimore USA.
Ros Gleadow, Monash University, Australia. Knowledge Exchange programmes in Science
Major global survey asks people about their attitudes toward science
A new Wellcome Trust survey asked more than 140,000 people across 140 countries about their attitudes towards science and health, and found that nearly 75% of people say they trust a doctor or a nurse more than friends, family, or other sources of health advice. Here’s more:
•Vaccines: Some 80% of people worldwide agree that vaccines are safe. One in three people in France — the highest percentage anywhere in the world — disagree that vaccines are safe.
•Understanding of science: Men are more likely to claim an understanding than women, as are those aged 29 and younger. Almost two-thirds of people around the world expressed an interest in learning more science.
•Science and society: About a third of people in Africa and Central and South America don’t feel like they benefit from science.
Science, Technology, Engineering
3.1. Describe Goal of technology
3.2. Identify different types of technology: application of science
3.3. Determine how science and technology both positively and negatively influence your life (risk/benefit analysis)
3.4. Describe the scientific solution process
3.5. Describe technology design, explain what a patents are
Mental Health and Emotional Wellbeing in Ireland 2019Amarach Research
A survey of the Irish population about the sources of mental health and wellbeing, drawing on the Human Givens framework in relation to psychological needs and resources.
We have been tracking the economic and emotional wellbeing of the Irish nation every month for the past 9 years. The good news is that our economic wellbeing is clearly getting better, the bad news is that our emotional wellbeing appears to be getting worse...
Our monthly index of Irish consumer spending, saving and borrowing intentions has reached an all time high nearly 9 years after we started measuring the mood of the nation.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...University of Maribor
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intelligent Systems.
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Inter-Society Networking Panel GRSS/MTT-S/CIS Panel Session: Promoting Connection and Cooperation
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
1. Comparing the Opinions of the
Science Community and the General
Public in Ireland
An Amárach Briefing to Science Foundation Ireland
November 2017
2. ➢ Background & Methodology
➢ SECTION 1: The Impact of Science
➢ SECTION 2: Climate Change & Natural Resources
➢ SECTION 3: Medicine & Food
➢ SECTION 4: Evolution & The Big Bang
➢ SECTION 5: The Role of Science
➢ SECTION 6: Scientists & Scientific Achievements
Awareness
➢ SECTION 7: Comparing Ireland Internationally
Presentation Structure
3. ➢ In advance of Science Week 2017, Science Foundation Ireland sought to conduct
research to measure and compare the opinions of the general public and the science
community in Ireland. Questions were asked across a range of subject including the
impact of science on everyday life, climate change and evolution, amongst others.
➢ The research format was based on the Pew Research Centre, a non-partisan think
tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world.
➢ The objective of the research was to uncover any differences and/ or similarities in the
views and perceptions of the general public and Irish scientists on issues relating to
science and everyday life.
➢ A national online survey of 1,000 adults* was conducted between 13th – 17th October,
while 238 members of the science community were surveyed online, via an email link
sent to researchers working in academia and industry by Science Foundation Ireland.
*referred to as general public throughout
Background & Methodology
5. 3% 5%
28%
41%
23%
8%
0%
3%
22%
67%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Q.1 Science has had a positive impact on people’s lives in Ireland.
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
6. 56%
65%
Transport
Public Vs. Science Community % who believe science has had a positive impact on…
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
65%
85%
Food
61%
79%
The Environment
62%
83%
Quality of Life
67%
87%
Education
71%
96%
Healthcare
47%
51%
Family Life
8. Q.3 Climate change is mostly due to human activity...
5%
8%
19%
36%
32%
1% 1%
6%
33%
59%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
9. Q.3 The earth is getting warmer due as a result of climate change…
3% 5%
23%
38%
31%
0% 1%
7%
28%
64%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
10. Q.3 There is broad agreement within the science community about the causes of climate change…
3%
10%
31%
36%
20%
1%
5% 5%
36%
53%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
11. Q.3 The growing world population will put a strain on natural resources…
3% 5%
16%
39% 37%
1% 3% 4%
23%
69%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
12. Q.3 The planet’s resources will sufficiently be able to deal with a growing population…
14%
34%
28%
19%
5%
26%
39%
18%
14%
3%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
13. Q.3 Wind turbine farms are an acceptable form of energy…
4% 4%
20%
40%
32%
0%
3%
6%
36%
55%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
15. Q.4 It is safe to eat genetically modified foods…
19%
24%
35%
17%
5%4%
10%
24%
34%
28%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
16. Q.4 It is safe to eat foods with pesticides…
23%
31%
28%
15%
3%
12%
22%
32%
28%
6%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
17. Q.4 Vaccinations are an acceptable form of preventative medical treatment…
5% 7%
24%
40%
24%
0% 1%
4%
18%
77%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
18. Q.4 I would support the bioengineering of artificial organs for use in transplants…
6% 7%
31%
38%
18%
1% 1%
8%
30%
60%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
20. Q.5 The universe was created by a big explosion almost 14 billion years ago…
8% 9%
39%
26%
18%
1% 2%
9%
33%
55%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
21. Q.5 How the universe was created can be sufficiently explained by science…
6%
15%
33% 33%
13%
5%
10%
17%
41%
27%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
22. Q.5 There is agreement amongst scientists that the universe was created by a big explosion…
5%
10%
38%
33%
14%
1%
5%
14%
44%
36%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
23. Q.5 Humans evolved over time guided by a supreme being…
18%
15%
38%
21%
8%
56%
17% 15%
8%
4%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
24. Q.5 Life on earth, including humans, evolved through a process of natural selection…
5% 7%
31%
35%
22%
1% 1%
6%
26%
66%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
25. Q.5 Humans have existed in present form since the beginning…
21%
26%
31%
15%
7%
77%
16%
4% 2% 1%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
27. Q.6 It is important for scientific findings to inform government policy...
3% 4%
25%
45%
23%
0% 0%
3%
18%
79%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
28. Q.6 Scientific findings regularly inform government policy…
3%
12%
46%
33%
6%4%
28%
38%
25%
5%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
29. Q.7 The general public does not know much about science...
3%
9%
26%
50%
12%
0%
20%
26%
47%
7%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
30. Q.7 The general public finds it hard to distinguish which scientific findings are well-founded…
2%
6%
21%
53%
18%
0%
4% 3%
56%
37%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
31. Q.7 There is not enough science education in schools…
2%
9%
27%
42%
20%
0%
6%
20%
37% 37%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
32. Q.7 The general public expects science to find solutions to problems too quickly…
2%
7%
27%
47%
17%
0%
7%
19%
49%
25%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
33. Q.8 I am interested in science news…
3%
9%
28%
43%
17%
0% 1% 3%
41%
55%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
34. Q.8 There is a lack of public interest in science news…
2%
8%
34%
48%
10%
1%
25%
33% 32%
9%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
35. Q.8 The Irish media lacks coverage of science news…
1%
9%
32%
44%
14%
0%
17%
33%
37%
13%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
36. Q.8 Scientists in Ireland are communicating science news sufficiently…
3%
23%
49%
21%
4%4%
36%
43%
17%
0%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
37. Q.8 The news media over-simplifies science news…
2%
12%
49%
29%
8%
0%
15%
19%
43%
23%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
39. Q.9 Please name any Irish scientists, past or present, that you are aware of?
69% of the public do not know of any Irish scientists,
past of present.
2%
2%
2%
2%
4%
13%
W.R.Hamilton
George Boole
Einstein
Francis Beaufort
Ernest Walton
Robert Boyle
Public – Top Mentions
10%
10%
11%
15%
18%
21%
24%
34%
48%
Luke O' Neill
George Stokes
University scientists or colleagues
Jocelyn Bell Burnell
George Boole
John Tyndall
W.R. Hamilton
Ernest Walton
Robert Boyle
Science Community – Top Mentions
All other mentions 5%
or less
All other mentions 1%
or less
40. Q.10 Please name any Irish scientific achievements, past or present, that you are aware of?
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
5%
Hypodermic Needle
Ernest Walton helped split the atom
Beaufort scale
First submarine
Birr Telescope
Boyle's Law
Public – Top Mentions
72% of the public do not know of any Irish scientific
achievements, past of present.
7%
8%
8%
10%
14%
15%
21%
27%
Beaufort scale
Tyndall effect
Pulsars
Hamilton's equations or mechanics
Contribution to medicine (generic)
Boolean Logic
Ernest Walton helped split the atom
Boyle's Law
Science Community – Top Mentions
All other mentions 6%
or less
All other mentions
less than 1%
41. Q.11 In your opinion, what do you believe to be the single greatest scientific achievement ever made?
3%
5%
5%
9%
10%
12%
The Wheel
Space Exploration
Communication technology
(internet/phone)
Medical advances/ vaccinations
Electricity
Penicillin/ antibiotics
Public – Top Mentions
6%
6%
7%
7%
8%
9%
10%
15%
Atom theory
Newton's Laws
Electricity
Theory of relativity
DNA
Natural evolution
Medical advances/ vaccinations
Penicillin/ antibiotics
Science Community – Top Mentions
35% of the public could not name what they believed to be the
single greatest scientific achievement ever made
All other mentions 5%
or less
All other mentions 2%
or less
43. Ireland performs well internationally in…
38%
64%
Scientific Achievements
44%
41%
Medical Treatment
38%
53%
Economic Development
51%
81%
Artistic Achievements
27%
36%
STEM Education
58%
53%
Sporting Achievements
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
44. Q.12 Ireland performs well internationally versus other industrialised nations in the following areas:
Scientific achievements
4%
11%
47%
33%
5%
1%
11%
24%
56%
8%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
45. Q.12 Ireland performs well internationally versus other industrialised nations in the following areas:
Medical treatment
6%
16%
34%
37%
7%
4%
20%
35% 36%
5%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
46. Q.12 Ireland performs well internationally versus other industrialised nations in the following areas:
Economic development
4%
17%
41%
33%
5%4%
15%
28%
49%
4%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
47. Q.12 Ireland performs well internationally versus other industrialised nations in the following areas:
STEM education
4%
14%
55%
23%
4%2%
21%
41%
31%
5%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
48. Q.12 Ireland performs well internationally versus other industrialised nations in the following areas:
Sporting achievements
3%
9%
30%
44%
14%
3%
10%
34%
43%
10%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
49. Q.12 Ireland performs well internationally versus other industrialised nations in the following areas:
Artistic achievements
3%
9%
37% 39%
12%
1%
5%
13%
51%
30%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
51. Q.2 Science has had a positive impact on the following areas of everyday life: Healthcare
5% 5%
19%
35% 36%
0% 0%
4%
14%
82%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
52. Q.2 Science has had a positive impact on the following areas of everyday life: Food
3%
8%
24%
44%
21%
1% 3%
11%
39%
46%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
53. Q.2 Science has had a positive impact on the following areas of everyday life: The Environment
4%
10%
25%
41%
20%
1%
5%
15%
35%
44%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
55. Q.2 Science has had a positive impact on the following areas of everyday life: Quality of Life
3%
7%
28%
42%
20%
0% 2%
15%
42% 41%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
56. Q.2 Science has had a positive impact on the following areas of everyday life: Family Life
4%
12%
37%
34%
13%
3%
6%
40%
36%
15%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
57. Q.2 Science has had a positive impact on the following areas of everyday life: Education
2%
6%
25%
44%
23%
0%
3%
10%
39%
48%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Public Science Community
Public – 1,001
Scientists - 239
58. e. info@amarach.com
t. 01 410 5200
w. www.amarach.com
b. www.amarach.com/blog
Tw. twitter.com/AmarachResearch
s. slideshare.net/amarach/