The assignment requires students to identify two relevant websites, review their codes of conduct, and respond to specific questions about the extent and values represented in these codes. Additionally, there is a journaling component where students reflect on decision-making criteria as managers and relate personal experiences. The assignment includes clarity on formatting, content analysis, and grading rubrics for evaluation.

1. Assignment Grading Rubric
Course: GB590 Unit: 3
Copyright Kaplan University
Instructions
Identify two websites relevant to you and your career. These
websites can be your company’s
website, the website for a company you find interesting, an
association that is relevant to your current
job or profession, or a website that is relevant to your future
planned career. An example of such a
website is the American Psychological Association. Review
their Code of Conduct and/or any
information that provides guidelines on how members are
expected to behave. Sometimes the Code
of Conduct is a separate document. Other times expected
behaviors are within their other materials.
Based on the two websites you identified above, review their
Code of Conduct and/or any information
that provides guidelines on how members should behave, then
answer the following questions:
1. How extensive are the codes from the two
organizations/associations?
2. Do these codes reflect values? What values?

2. 3. Do these codes reflect laws and policies? How?
4. What kinds of actions do the codes cover?
5. Are there ramifications for violations? How extensive are the
ramifications?
6. What influence do you believe these codes of conduct have
on the decision-making
behavior of their members or employees?
Each answer should be a paragraph or two and well written.
Include a title page and the questions
with answers. Cite and reference as needed. Identify the two
organizations you used. Write a brief
introduction, answer each question under separate headings, and
then write a short conclusion.
Submit your paper via the Unit 3 Assignment Dropbox.
Rubric
Weighting Possible Points Points
Earned
Grammar and Spelling
20% 14

3. Style and Coherence
unnecessary words or phrases
and used properly
assignment
Assignment Grading Rubric
Course: GB590 Unit: 3
Copyright Kaplan University
Organiz

4. topics being covered
sults from the
thesis
Format
following general format requirements
(Margins, header, footer, font size,
general amount of work)
(e.g., appendices, tables of contents,
when appropriate) to improve the flow of
the paper
following APA.
Content/Analysis
Overall:

5. are answered in a substantive manner
are supported by details and analysis
persuasive
-to-date
Specifically:
Based on the two websites identified, the student
will review the Codes of Conduct and/or any
information that provides guidelines on how
members should behave, then answer the following
questions:
1. How extensive are the codes from the two
organizations/associations?
2. Do these codes reflect values? What values?
3. Do these codes reflect laws and policies? How?
4. What kinds of actions do the codes cover?
5. Are there ramifications for violations? How
extensive are the ramifications?
6. What influence do you believe these codes of
conduct have on the decision-making behavior
of their members or employees?

6. 80% 56
Assignment Grading Rubric
Course: GB590 Unit: 3
Copyright Kaplan University
Total: 100% 70 Possible
Points
[ ] Points
Earned
Additional Instructor Comments:
Journal Grading Rubric

7. Course: GB590 Unit: 3
Copyright Kaplan University
Instructions
Please reflect upon the journal entries you made in the first two
weeks. As you read each of this
week’s articles, address the following in your journaling:
1. Identify the criteria and factors, identified in this week’s
reading, that are relevant when making
decisions as a manager or leader.
2. Taking the two examples (one example of right versus right
moral dilemma, and one example of
right versus wrong from your work experience) that you
identified in week one, what criteria and
factors were considered during the examination of the issue or
dilemma?
3. What decision making criteria were ultimately used?
o What steps were taken to identify the values and rights of
stakeholders?
o How were policy and legal requirements recognized?
Your journaling assignment should be approximately 500-600
words. There is no need to use formal
APA styling.
Rubric

8. Weighting Possible
Points
Points
Earned
Grammar and Spelling
20% 6
Style and Coherence
te in thought
unnecessary words or phrases
used properly
assignment

9. Organization
being covered
gical conclusion that results from the thesis
Format
general format requirements (Margins,
header, footer, font size, general amount of
work)
Journal Grading Rubric
Course: GB590 Unit: 3

10. Copyright Kaplan University
appendices, tables of contents, when
appropriate) to improve the flow of the paper
Content/Analysis
Overall:
estions/requirements of the assignment
are answered in a substantive manner
are supported by details and analysis
persuasive
actice
-to-date
Specifically:
Please reflect upon the journal entries you made in
the first two weeks. As you read each of this week’s
articles, address the following in your journaling:

11. 1. Identify the criteria and factors, identified in this
week’s reading, that are relevant when making
decisions as a manager or leader.
2. Taking the two examples (one example of right
versus right moral dilemma, and one example
of right versus wrong from your work
experience) that you identified in week one,
what criteria and factors were considered
during the examination of the issue or
dilemma?
3. What decision making criteria were ultimately
used?
values and rights of stakeholders?
recognized?
80% 24
Total: 100% 30 Possible
Points
[ ] Points
Earned
Additional Instructor Comments: