Assignment 4: e-Recruiting
Due Week 8 and worth 180 points
Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:
Identify and discuss some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
List and define the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.
Take a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.
Provide two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.
Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this assignment.
Note:
Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Analyze the complexities of HRIS administration.
Analyze talent management and its importance to the organization.
Evaluate the use of the Internet to achieve organizational recruiting, training, and development objectives.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource information systems.
Write clearly and concisely about human resource information systems using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 180
Assignment 4: e-Recruiting
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1 Identify and discuss some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Partially identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Satisfactorily identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Thoroughly identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
2. List and define the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one.
Assignment 4 e-RecruitingDue Week 8 and worth 180 pointsWri.docx
1. Assignment 4: e-Recruiting
Due Week 8 and worth 180 points
Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:
Identify and discuss some advantages and disadvantages of
using online recruiting.
List and define the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact
online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may
be most important. Provide an explanation.
Take a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website
(attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your
motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your
position with specific examples from 2 business websites from
which you are familiar.
Provide two examples of assessment testing and list the pros
and cons of each assessment testing.
Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this
assignment.
Note:
Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic
resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size
12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow
APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for
any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the
date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this
assignment are:
2. Analyze the complexities of HRIS administration.
Analyze talent management and its importance to the
organization.
Evaluate the use of the Internet to achieve organizational
recruiting, training, and development objectives.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in
human resource information systems.
Write clearly and concisely about human resource information
systems using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality,
logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills,
using the following rubric.
Points: 180
Assignment 4: e-Recruiting
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1 Identify and discuss some advantages and disadvantages of
3. using online recruiting.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed some
advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Partially identified and discussed some advantages and
disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Satisfactorily identified and discussed some advantages and
disadvantages of using online recruiting.
Thoroughly identified and discussed some advantages and
disadvantages of using online recruiting.
2. List and define the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact
online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may
be most important. Provide an explanation.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely listed and defined the four (4)
recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one
(1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide
an explanation.
Partially listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives
that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives
you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.
Satisfactorily listed and defined the four (4) recruiting
objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the
objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an
explanation.
Thoroughly listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives
that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives
you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.
3. Take a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website
(attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your
motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your
position with specific examples from 2 business websites from
which you are familiar.
4. Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely took a stand on whether or not
the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of
use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain
company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2
business websites from which you are familiar.
Partially took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a
website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect
your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify
your position with specific examples from 2 business websites
from which you are familiar.
Satisfactorily took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a
website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect
your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify
your position with specific examples from 2 business websites
from which you are familiar.
Thoroughly took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a
website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect
your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify
your position with specific examples from 2 business websites
from which you are familiar.
4.
Provide two examples of assessment testing and list the pros
and cons of each assessment testing.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely provided two examples of
assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment
testing.
Partially provided two examples of assessment testing and list
the pros and cons of each assessment testing.
Satisfactorily provided two examples of assessment testing and
list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.
Thoroughly provided two examples of assessment testing and
5. list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.
5. 4 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all
references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality
choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Assignment 5: e-Compensation
Due Week 10 and worth 200 points
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
Assess the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based
compensation tool versus a client-server based or stand-alone
PC-based system and then give your opinion on which system
would provide the most value to an organization’s stakeholders.
Include three (3) facts to support your opinion.
Justify the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation
process from the perspective of HR, management, and the
employee.
Evaluate three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a
centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared
to a more decentralized approach.
Suggest three (3) types of integrated analytic features that are
needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-
Compensation systems.
Assess the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the
potential of Web-based internal equity tools and propose three
6. (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.
Recommend three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to
evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary
studies, etc.) that they receive from outside sources.
Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this
assignment.
Note:
Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic
resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size
12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow
APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for
any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the
date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this
assignment are:
·
Analyze the complexities of HRIS administration.
Evaluate the role of HRIS with performance management,
compensation, benefits, and payroll.
·
Use technology and information resources to research issues in
human resource information systems.
·
Write clearly and concisely about human resource information
systems using proper writing mechanics.
7. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality,
logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills,
using the following rubric.
Points: 200
Assignment 5: e-Compensation
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Assess the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-
based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-alone
PC-based system and then give your opinion on which system
would provide the most value to the organization’s
stakeholders. Include three (3) facts to support your opinion.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely assessed the advantages and
disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a
client-server or stand-along PC-based system. Did not submit or
incompletely gave your opinion on which system would provide
the most value to the organization’s stakeholders. Did not
submit or incompletely included three (3) facts to support your
opinion.
Partially assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using a
Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-
8. alone PC-based system. Partially gave your opinion on which
system would provide the most value to the organization’s
stakeholders. Partially included three (3) facts to support your
opinion.
Satisfactorily assessed the advantages and disadvantages of
using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or
stand-alone PC-based system. Satisfactorily gave your opinion
on which system would provide the most value to the
organization’s stakeholders. Satisfactorily included three (3)
facts to support your opinion.
Thoroughly assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using
a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-
alone PC-based system. Thoroughly gave your opinion on which
system would provide the most value to the organization’s
stakeholders. Thoroughly included three (3) facts to support
your opinion.
2. Justify the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation
process from the perspective of HR, management, and the
employee.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely justified the use of e-
Compensation tools in the job- evaluation process from the
perspective of HR, management, and the employee.
Partially justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-
evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management,
and the employee.
Satisfactorily justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the
job-evaluation process from the perspective of HR,
management, and the employee.
Thoroughly justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-
evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management,
and the employee.
3. Evaluate three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a
centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared
to a more decentralized approach.
Weight: 15%
9. Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) benefits and
three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit
pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach.
Partially evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of
a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs
compared to a more decentralized approach.
Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3)
drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay
programs compared to a more decentralized approach.
Thoroughly evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks
of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs
compared to a more decentralized approach.
4. Suggest three (3) types of integrated analytical features that
are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-
Compensation systems.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely suggested three (3) types of
integrated analytical features that are needed for compensation
planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems.
Partially suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical
features that are needed for compensation planning and decision
support in e-Compensation systems.
Satisfactorily suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical
features that are needed for compensation planning and decision
support in e-Compensation systems.
Thoroughly suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical
features that are needed for compensation planning and decision
support in e-Compensation systems.
5. Assess the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing
the potential of Web-based internal equity tools and propose
three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely assessed the barriers that
prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based
internal equity tools. Did not submit or incompletely proposed
three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.
10. Partially assessed the barriers that prevent organizations from
realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools.
Partially proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those
barriers.
Satisfactorily assessed the barriers that prevent organizations
from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools.
Satisfactorily proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those
barriers.
Thoroughly assessed the barriers that prevent organizations
from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools.
Thoroughly proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those
barriers.
6. Recommend three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to
evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary
studies, etc.) that receive from outside sources.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely recommended three (3)
strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of
market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they
receive from outside sources.
Partially recommended three (3) strategies that HR managers
can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys,
benchmark salary studies) that they receive from outside
sources.
Satisfactorily recommended three (3) strategies that HR
managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data
(surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they receive from
outside sources.
Thoroughly recommended three (3) approaches that HR
managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data
(surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they receive from
outside sources.
7. 4 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all
11. references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality
choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present