A.R.T.S. APS Active ResearchReginald SandersCohort 2
Action Research Problem StatementThere is a problem at Sammye E. Coan Middle school. Specifically the problem is maximizing engagement and participation in choral class. Currently students are losing focus and talking excessively causing a loss of instructional time. Currently detention, additional work, and administrative referrals are given to address the problem.
Aim: Find and implement creative methods to maintain a high level of student engagement.
Test Group/ Domain7th grade Girls Chorus3rd period 18 students60 minute classMeeting time 11:45-12:45B Day only
MethodOne week of off task count with normal rehearsalSurvey of students’ opinion of classroom climateOne week off task count with the addition of a warm-up CDOne week off task count with the addition of a Student DirectorOne week off task count using all three CD, Student Director, and accompaniment CDExtra: One week off task count placing each section on smart music/ garage band or computer applications while the other part rehearses with teacher.
Off task count Week #1Average percentage of students off task during a normal class rehearsalFirst ten minutes: 50%Twenty minutes: 9%Thirty minutes: 90%Forty minutes: 30%Fifty Minutes: 30%Sixty Minutes:20%
Off task count Week #2Average percentage of students off task during aaltered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s First ten minutes:15%Twenty minutes: 20%Thirty minutes:14%Forty minutes: 30%Fifty Minutes:2%Sixty Minutes: 5%
Off task count Week #3Average percentage of students off task during aaltered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s and student director.First ten minutes:11%Twenty minutes: 15%Thirty minutes:25%Forty minutes: 40%Fifty Minutes:12%Sixty Minutes:10%
Off task count Week #4Average percentage of students off task during aaltered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s , student director and accompaniment CD’sFirst ten minutes:10%Twenty minutes: 11%Thirty minutes:22%Forty minutes:41%Fifty Minutes:21%Sixty Minutes: 16%
Off task count Week #5Average percentage of students off task during  an altered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s , student director, accompaniment CD’s, and sectionals/ small groups: First ten minutes: 5%Twenty minutes: 13%Thirty minutes:18%Forty minutes: 30%Fifty Minutes: 5%Sixty Minutes: 10%
Off Task Count ResultsAverage percentage of students off task during an altered class rehearsal:First ten minutes: 10%		Change of : -40%Twenty minutes: 15%		Change of: +6% Thirty minutes: 20%		Change of: -70%Forty minutes: 35%		Change of: +5%Fifty Minutes: 10%			Change of: -20%Sixty Minutes:10%			Change of: -10%
Results of student engagement and participation ComparisonPercentage
Survey Data Result
Off Task BehaviorContributing Factors:Students were given a survey containing nine open response questions.Students completed the survey anonymously to ensure they answered honestly. The top factors were:Number one contributing factor 80% Talking and or Joking aroundNumber two factor: the other students around them.Number three factor: Song SelectionClass selection: Students being placed in chorus without choice or placed in wrong choral level class
Action Research ProcessStep one: Live Warm-upsMake varying CD’s with the warm-ups already prepared.Allow one student to run the entire warm-up routine with the teacher facilitating. Question 3 from the survey: Would you like to have student leaders for rehearsal? The results were50/50 split when it pertained to another student leading,however, 95% wanted to be a student leader.
Action Research ProcessSteptwo: Add student director.usingvarying CD’s with the warm-ups already prepared, allow one student to run the entire warm-up routine with the teacher facilitating. Question 3 from the survey: Would you like to have student leaders for rehearsal? The results were50/50 split when it pertained to another student leading,however, 95% wanted to be a student leader. Students were extremely vocal about who should be chosen to lead them.
Action Research ProcessStepthree: Get from behind the piano.Make CD’s of accompaniments for each song in repertoireStudents used them in sectionals and small groups.Students used them to record themselves and use Smart Music. Some students even requested a copy for home rehearsalCd’s allowed me to let the choir keep singing while, I could physically walk in the midst of them for independent diction, breathing and posture correction.
Solutions: What Did Not WorkComputer software such as Musictheory.net trainersRandomly picking student directors Using New student directors every rehearsal
Solutions: What WorkedThe use of technology such as Cd’s and Smart MusicSmaller groups or sectionalsAllowing students to earn a chance to lead their peers

ARTS APS Action Research (INC)

  • 1.
    A.R.T.S. APS ActiveResearchReginald SandersCohort 2
  • 2.
    Action Research ProblemStatementThere is a problem at Sammye E. Coan Middle school. Specifically the problem is maximizing engagement and participation in choral class. Currently students are losing focus and talking excessively causing a loss of instructional time. Currently detention, additional work, and administrative referrals are given to address the problem.
  • 3.
    Aim: Find andimplement creative methods to maintain a high level of student engagement.
  • 4.
    Test Group/ Domain7thgrade Girls Chorus3rd period 18 students60 minute classMeeting time 11:45-12:45B Day only
  • 5.
    MethodOne week ofoff task count with normal rehearsalSurvey of students’ opinion of classroom climateOne week off task count with the addition of a warm-up CDOne week off task count with the addition of a Student DirectorOne week off task count using all three CD, Student Director, and accompaniment CDExtra: One week off task count placing each section on smart music/ garage band or computer applications while the other part rehearses with teacher.
  • 6.
    Off task countWeek #1Average percentage of students off task during a normal class rehearsalFirst ten minutes: 50%Twenty minutes: 9%Thirty minutes: 90%Forty minutes: 30%Fifty Minutes: 30%Sixty Minutes:20%
  • 7.
    Off task countWeek #2Average percentage of students off task during aaltered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s First ten minutes:15%Twenty minutes: 20%Thirty minutes:14%Forty minutes: 30%Fifty Minutes:2%Sixty Minutes: 5%
  • 8.
    Off task countWeek #3Average percentage of students off task during aaltered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s and student director.First ten minutes:11%Twenty minutes: 15%Thirty minutes:25%Forty minutes: 40%Fifty Minutes:12%Sixty Minutes:10%
  • 9.
    Off task countWeek #4Average percentage of students off task during aaltered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s , student director and accompaniment CD’sFirst ten minutes:10%Twenty minutes: 11%Thirty minutes:22%Forty minutes:41%Fifty Minutes:21%Sixty Minutes: 16%
  • 10.
    Off task countWeek #5Average percentage of students off task during an altered class rehearsal using warm-up CD’s , student director, accompaniment CD’s, and sectionals/ small groups: First ten minutes: 5%Twenty minutes: 13%Thirty minutes:18%Forty minutes: 30%Fifty Minutes: 5%Sixty Minutes: 10%
  • 11.
    Off Task CountResultsAverage percentage of students off task during an altered class rehearsal:First ten minutes: 10% Change of : -40%Twenty minutes: 15% Change of: +6% Thirty minutes: 20% Change of: -70%Forty minutes: 35% Change of: +5%Fifty Minutes: 10% Change of: -20%Sixty Minutes:10% Change of: -10%
  • 12.
    Results of studentengagement and participation ComparisonPercentage
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Off Task BehaviorContributingFactors:Students were given a survey containing nine open response questions.Students completed the survey anonymously to ensure they answered honestly. The top factors were:Number one contributing factor 80% Talking and or Joking aroundNumber two factor: the other students around them.Number three factor: Song SelectionClass selection: Students being placed in chorus without choice or placed in wrong choral level class
  • 15.
    Action Research ProcessStepone: Live Warm-upsMake varying CD’s with the warm-ups already prepared.Allow one student to run the entire warm-up routine with the teacher facilitating. Question 3 from the survey: Would you like to have student leaders for rehearsal? The results were50/50 split when it pertained to another student leading,however, 95% wanted to be a student leader.
  • 16.
    Action Research ProcessSteptwo:Add student director.usingvarying CD’s with the warm-ups already prepared, allow one student to run the entire warm-up routine with the teacher facilitating. Question 3 from the survey: Would you like to have student leaders for rehearsal? The results were50/50 split when it pertained to another student leading,however, 95% wanted to be a student leader. Students were extremely vocal about who should be chosen to lead them.
  • 17.
    Action Research ProcessStepthree:Get from behind the piano.Make CD’s of accompaniments for each song in repertoireStudents used them in sectionals and small groups.Students used them to record themselves and use Smart Music. Some students even requested a copy for home rehearsalCd’s allowed me to let the choir keep singing while, I could physically walk in the midst of them for independent diction, breathing and posture correction.
  • 18.
    Solutions: What DidNot WorkComputer software such as Musictheory.net trainersRandomly picking student directors Using New student directors every rehearsal
  • 19.
    Solutions: What WorkedTheuse of technology such as Cd’s and Smart MusicSmaller groups or sectionalsAllowing students to earn a chance to lead their peers