Slides for my presentation at the 1st Altmetrics Conference, 1AM:London, 26 september 2014. The slides provide an overview of the status of article-level metrics at Springer, how we use them, and an outlook of where it may go.
Tracy Gardner from Simon Inger Consulting presents the results of their 12 month research project, which included a survey of how over 40,000 readers discover scholarly content. The findings are pertinent to publishers and information professionals alike across sectors.
The document discusses altmetrics and bibliometrics practices at Terkko, the medical campus library of Helsinki University. Key points:
1) Terkko tracks altmetrics and article-level metrics for publications from its medical campus through tools like FeedNavigator, Scholar Chart, CiteULike, ImpactStory and Mendeley to increase visibility.
2) The Terkko Navigator platform displays metrics and scholar profiles with embedded altmetrics and links to Scopus.
3) Future plans include expanding social media tracking and the Terkko Kudos service to further increase global impact and visibility of medical campus publications.
Simon inger 2016 nfais annual conference presentation - how readers discove...Simon Inger
A first glimpse of the results of the much anticipated repeat of How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications. The 2015 results follow up on the work done in 2012, 2008, and 2005. The work looks at a range of starting points for journal and online book discovery and with 40000 respondents provides in-depth sectoral, regional and subject-based breakdowns of the data.
SpringerNature and its sharing strategy on ReadCubeMartijn Roelandse
SpringerNature launched a content sharing initiative on their ReadCube platform to encourage sharing of subscription journal articles in a compliant way. They provided read-only access to full texts of 49 Nature Publishing Group journal articles on nature.com to be shared via peer-to-peer or from media/blog referrals. In the first year, they saw over 800k shared views, mostly from media referrals. They aim to continue evolving sharing features and policies based on feedback to better support collaborative research.
The volume of scholarly literature is growing rapidly and mega-journals become more and more mainstream. Scholars therefore need (new) filters to select those articles most relevant for their work. Once published, the impact of their contribution to science is mostly assessed on the basis of out-of-date mechanisms such as the impact factor. However, the actual influence of their contribution on the journal's performance will only be visible for after another 2-3 years. At the same time, many funding bodies and universities still judge scholarly performance on the average impact factor of the journal they published in. A value they may not even have attributed to as a fraction of articles are never cited, ranging from only a few to up to 80%.
A more accurate evaluation of scholarly performance would be to judge their work on a article level. Here metrics such as citations, usage, and those that track impact outside the academy, impact of influential but uncited work, and impact from sources that aren’t peer-reviewed - other important value metrics beyond the strength of a journal. Alternative metrics are still in their early stages; many questions are unanswered. But given the rapid evolution of scholarly communication, we will soon know their impact on the impact factor.
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015Martijn Roelandse
In this fast-paced world, there are many different factors which affect the landscape of the academic publishing world. During my talk at NUS in Singapore I tried to outline these significant factors and their impact on research.
Outline
• Pressure on Reviewers
• Open Access
• Author Focus
• The Measurement of "Quality"
• Bookmetrix
• Big Data
Library technology in content discovery - evidence from a large-scale reader ...Simon Inger
This document summarizes the results of a large-scale survey of over 19,000 readers globally about how they discover and access scholarly content. The survey was supported by several academic publishers and aimed to provide data to publishers, libraries, and technology companies on the relative importance of different discovery channels. It finds that while publishers' websites and search engines are still dominant, libraries and library-linked discovery tools play an important role in many subject areas. The full report contains extensive breakdowns of the results by demographics, disciplines, and other categories.
Tracy Gardner from Simon Inger Consulting presents the results of their 12 month research project, which included a survey of how over 40,000 readers discover scholarly content. The findings are pertinent to publishers and information professionals alike across sectors.
The document discusses altmetrics and bibliometrics practices at Terkko, the medical campus library of Helsinki University. Key points:
1) Terkko tracks altmetrics and article-level metrics for publications from its medical campus through tools like FeedNavigator, Scholar Chart, CiteULike, ImpactStory and Mendeley to increase visibility.
2) The Terkko Navigator platform displays metrics and scholar profiles with embedded altmetrics and links to Scopus.
3) Future plans include expanding social media tracking and the Terkko Kudos service to further increase global impact and visibility of medical campus publications.
Simon inger 2016 nfais annual conference presentation - how readers discove...Simon Inger
A first glimpse of the results of the much anticipated repeat of How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications. The 2015 results follow up on the work done in 2012, 2008, and 2005. The work looks at a range of starting points for journal and online book discovery and with 40000 respondents provides in-depth sectoral, regional and subject-based breakdowns of the data.
SpringerNature and its sharing strategy on ReadCubeMartijn Roelandse
SpringerNature launched a content sharing initiative on their ReadCube platform to encourage sharing of subscription journal articles in a compliant way. They provided read-only access to full texts of 49 Nature Publishing Group journal articles on nature.com to be shared via peer-to-peer or from media/blog referrals. In the first year, they saw over 800k shared views, mostly from media referrals. They aim to continue evolving sharing features and policies based on feedback to better support collaborative research.
The volume of scholarly literature is growing rapidly and mega-journals become more and more mainstream. Scholars therefore need (new) filters to select those articles most relevant for their work. Once published, the impact of their contribution to science is mostly assessed on the basis of out-of-date mechanisms such as the impact factor. However, the actual influence of their contribution on the journal's performance will only be visible for after another 2-3 years. At the same time, many funding bodies and universities still judge scholarly performance on the average impact factor of the journal they published in. A value they may not even have attributed to as a fraction of articles are never cited, ranging from only a few to up to 80%.
A more accurate evaluation of scholarly performance would be to judge their work on a article level. Here metrics such as citations, usage, and those that track impact outside the academy, impact of influential but uncited work, and impact from sources that aren’t peer-reviewed - other important value metrics beyond the strength of a journal. Alternative metrics are still in their early stages; many questions are unanswered. But given the rapid evolution of scholarly communication, we will soon know their impact on the impact factor.
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015Martijn Roelandse
In this fast-paced world, there are many different factors which affect the landscape of the academic publishing world. During my talk at NUS in Singapore I tried to outline these significant factors and their impact on research.
Outline
• Pressure on Reviewers
• Open Access
• Author Focus
• The Measurement of "Quality"
• Bookmetrix
• Big Data
Library technology in content discovery - evidence from a large-scale reader ...Simon Inger
This document summarizes the results of a large-scale survey of over 19,000 readers globally about how they discover and access scholarly content. The survey was supported by several academic publishers and aimed to provide data to publishers, libraries, and technology companies on the relative importance of different discovery channels. It finds that while publishers' websites and search engines are still dominant, libraries and library-linked discovery tools play an important role in many subject areas. The full report contains extensive breakdowns of the results by demographics, disciplines, and other categories.
Innovations in Analytics for Academic Publishing and Research NetworkingTobias Abarbanell
How we use the frontiers and loop platforms to build reputation for academics: providing a variety of article level metrics with breakdown by demography, geography of readers, and by connecting social interaction with the articles of Academic Publishers.
Conference presentation from #DataSocial conference in SF, Apr-2015
Innovations in Analytics for Academic Publishing and Research NetworkingSandra Hausmann
Presentation was held by Tobias Arbarbanell and Sandra Hausmann @ Social Media and Webanalytics Innovation Conference on April 30th 2015 in San Francisco #DataSocial:
Abstract
Frontiers is a community-rooted-open-access publisher that is building the ultimate Open Science platform geared towards the needs of researchers and academic organizations in the 21st century. With more than 200,000 of the top scientist on board, Frontiers belongs to the top 5 open access publishers worldwide.
Loop, the Frontiers social network for academics, is specifically designed to boost the reach and the impact of the researcher’s publications. In this session we will explore how our impact analytics allow our users to immediately and accurately assess the reach and growing influence of their work within and beyond the research community.
The document discusses reports in Google Analytics, including:
- An overview of Google Analytics features and reports for metrics like traffic sources, audience behavior, and conversions.
- How to understand the layout and structure of reports, customize dashboards, compare metrics, and explore key reports like audience, traffic sources, and content.
- Exercises for attendees to dig into sample report data and identify trends in metrics like visits, new visitors, and search traffic over time.
Novinky u Elsevier: Citace, metriky, spolupráceKnihovnaUTB
The document discusses new features and updates from Elsevier, including Mendeley, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. It summarizes:
Mendeley now offers institutional editions with more storage space, teams, collaborators, and analytics dashboards. A new certification program provides Mendeley Premium upgrades for librarians.
Scopus is re-evaluating journal content to ensure high quality. It is expanding cited references back to 1996 and books to provide better coverage. New metrics and APIs will integrate article-level data and citations into Scopus.
ScienceDirect is working with institutional repositories through new APIs to retrieve metadata, check access entitlements, and retrieve full-text content in order to better support sharing
This document discusses evaluation in public relations, including how evaluation research can be used to develop programs and test messages. It describes how media monitoring services have evolved with digital technology, allowing expanded tracking and analysis of data. Key aspects of evaluation covered include message testing, media monitoring, metrics and analytics. The document also evaluates research practices using standards like the Barcelona Principles, which address goals, measurement, methodology, and ethics.
The journal publishing platform ARPHA, as presented in Moscow, Russia (2017) by Prof. Pavel Stoev.
Russian version available at: https://www.slideshare.net/pensoft/arpha-platform-presented-in-moscow-december-2017
The document discusses Nature Publishing Group's APIs and plans for an API developer portal:
1) Nature Publishing Group aims to provide quality scientific data through APIs to enable new applications and share ideas through a developer community on their upcoming developer portal.
2) Their API business model will have different access tiers for keyless public access, non-commercial developers, non-commercial reuse, and commercial developers.
3) Current APIs include an OpenSearch API and Blogs API, and future APIs planned are for article content, jobs, events, and research highlights.
A presentation on 'Publishing in Academic Journals – Tips to help you succeed' presented at the 2015 University of South Africa (Unisa) Authors Workshop organised by Unisa’s College of Graduate Studies and the Unisa Library
Researcher KnowHow: Introduction to bibliometrics with Charles MartinezLivUniLibrary
Charles Martinez delivered a session on Scopus, SciVal and bibliometrics published. It includes an in-depth look at using Scopus and how to track the impact of your research using SciVal. Charles also gave some words of advice about responsible use of metrics.
Defining true north metrics to quantify engagement at LinkedInBonnie Barrilleaux
This document discusses defining metrics to measure engagement on LinkedIn. It recommends developing a "true north" metric that measures the overall goal or member value proposition, along with supporting "signpost" metrics that provide faster feedback. Examples are given of metrics for content sharing that could be measured at different points in the user experience funnel. Key considerations for metrics include balancing complexity, keeping them actionable, focusing on important user groups, and relating metrics back to member value.
Are you ready to get read? Optimize your own publishing experience and impro...Max Haring
Dr. Max Haring gave a seminar about optimizing publishing experiences and impact. He discussed choosing the right journal by considering its focus, publication type, potential audience, and open access options. He also encouraged authors to improve discoverability through search engine optimization of titles and adding metadata. Finally, he advocated being open by publishing open access, engaging in collaborative writing, sharing research data and code, and using altmetrics and open peer review to increase impact.
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Electronic Collection ManagementSelena Killick
This document summarizes Selena Killick's presentation on evaluating big deal journal packages through qualitative and quantitative methods at Cranfield University. Cranfield University spends over £150 million annually, with 68% of its information expenditure going towards journal subscriptions in 2010-2011. Killick developed an approach using both quantitative metrics like downloads, costs, and usage trends, as well qualitative measures involving academic liaisons and analyzing reading lists and REF preferred journals. She created an Excel template to automate calculations from COUNTER and subscription data. The results helped inform collection decisions while justifying expenditures and demonstrating the value of resources.
Identifying and understanding research impact:
A comprehensive suite of metrics embedded throughout Scopus is designed to help facilitate evaluation and provide a better view of your research interests. Whether you are looking for metrics at the journal, article or author level, Scopus combines its sophisticated analytical capabilities with its unbiased and broad content coverage to help you build valuable insights.
Here we look at:
Author level metrics
Journal metrics
Article level metrics
Eric Mayer and Kathryn Eccles, Oxford Internet InstituteSarahFahmy
The document discusses methods for measuring the impact and usage of digital resources. It summarizes a study that looked at five JISC-funded projects to test impact measurement techniques. The study used both quantitative methods like webometrics, log file analysis, and bibliometrics as well as qualitative methods like interviews and focus groups. For each project, it analyzed awareness, usage patterns, citation practices, and user communities to understand how the resources were used and embedded within academic work. The document recommends considering impact from the start of a project and identifying connections to other resources and communities to help increase audience and impact.
A presentation by Kathryn Eccles and Eric Meyer to the JISC workshop 'Analysing Digital Audiences for First World War Digital Content' held on 06 Septmber 2011.
The New Dimensions in Scholcomm: How a global scholarly community collaborati...NASIG
Digital Science and 100+ global research institutions have spent the better part of the last two years collaborating to solve three distinct challenges in the existing research landscape:
* Research evaluation focuses almost exclusively on publications and citations data
* Research evaluation tools are siloed in proprietary applications that rarely speak to each other
* The gaps amongst proprietary data sources made generating a complete picture of impact extremely difficult (and expensive)
The goal of this collaboration amongst publishers, funders, research administrators, libraries, and Digital Science was to transform the research landscape by attempting to solve the problems resulting from expensive, siloed data research evaluation data.
1. The document summarizes the top 10 latest digital library trends according to Springer Nature, including institutional repositories and data management, open access, content sharing, ORCID, linked data and linked open data, alternative metrics, text data mining, marketing online resources, affordable textbooks, and ways to keep up with trends.
2. Trends include the growth of institutional repositories and libraries assisting with data management plans, open access publishing expanding through platforms like SpringerOpen and BiomedCentral, content sharing programs allowing researchers to share subscription content, and the use of ORCID identifiers to attribute work.
3. Emerging trends also involve linked data and linked open data to connect related information, alternative metrics to measure impact beyond
Importance of environment for online advertisingNewsworks
- Newsbrand and original content sites are highly trusted sources of digital news and information, more so than social media or other sites.
- Advertising is more effective and drives stronger consumer actions, like visits to advertiser websites, when placed on trusted newsbrand and original content sites compared to other online environments like social media or portals.
- Multiple studies show advertising on newsbrand and original content sites improves brand awareness, perception, favorability, and purchase intent more than advertising on less trusted general sites.
DH Week Workshop: Pinterest as ExhibitionNoreen Whysel
Pinterest offers a unique way to display and interrelate digital assets with a wider world of interconnected materials and activity. Learn how UK-based research group, Architecture_MPS promotes its journal articles, conferences and online resources by exposing it’s relationships with other research, exhibitions, and imagery. As part of our engagement with scholarly communication AMPS provides current listings supported by additional materials relevant to both academics and discipline information professionals. Since 2014, we have used Pinterest for curating collections of images and articles on topics related to our published journal articles. The boards function as a resource guide or reference to current books, films, exhibits, conferences, lectures and competitions related to the AMPS remit.
Location: METRO, 57 East 11th Street, 4th Floor Training Room
Free UKSG webinar - Altmetrics for Librarians: a publisher dashboard, a unive...Timon Oefelein
This two part webinar introduces the topic of altmetrics to the library community.
The first part of the session briefly defines the term before showing how Springer, a large global STM publisher, provides altmetric data for its journal articles and book content on the SpringerLink platform, to provide valuable and insightful data on the wider impact of published content.
The second part of the webinar provides an overview of how the Scholarly Communications Team at the University of Manchester Library has embedded altmetric support into their standard service to researchers and support staff.
This presentation by Katharine Kemp, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law & Justice at UNSW Sydney, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Innovations in Analytics for Academic Publishing and Research NetworkingTobias Abarbanell
How we use the frontiers and loop platforms to build reputation for academics: providing a variety of article level metrics with breakdown by demography, geography of readers, and by connecting social interaction with the articles of Academic Publishers.
Conference presentation from #DataSocial conference in SF, Apr-2015
Innovations in Analytics for Academic Publishing and Research NetworkingSandra Hausmann
Presentation was held by Tobias Arbarbanell and Sandra Hausmann @ Social Media and Webanalytics Innovation Conference on April 30th 2015 in San Francisco #DataSocial:
Abstract
Frontiers is a community-rooted-open-access publisher that is building the ultimate Open Science platform geared towards the needs of researchers and academic organizations in the 21st century. With more than 200,000 of the top scientist on board, Frontiers belongs to the top 5 open access publishers worldwide.
Loop, the Frontiers social network for academics, is specifically designed to boost the reach and the impact of the researcher’s publications. In this session we will explore how our impact analytics allow our users to immediately and accurately assess the reach and growing influence of their work within and beyond the research community.
The document discusses reports in Google Analytics, including:
- An overview of Google Analytics features and reports for metrics like traffic sources, audience behavior, and conversions.
- How to understand the layout and structure of reports, customize dashboards, compare metrics, and explore key reports like audience, traffic sources, and content.
- Exercises for attendees to dig into sample report data and identify trends in metrics like visits, new visitors, and search traffic over time.
Novinky u Elsevier: Citace, metriky, spolupráceKnihovnaUTB
The document discusses new features and updates from Elsevier, including Mendeley, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. It summarizes:
Mendeley now offers institutional editions with more storage space, teams, collaborators, and analytics dashboards. A new certification program provides Mendeley Premium upgrades for librarians.
Scopus is re-evaluating journal content to ensure high quality. It is expanding cited references back to 1996 and books to provide better coverage. New metrics and APIs will integrate article-level data and citations into Scopus.
ScienceDirect is working with institutional repositories through new APIs to retrieve metadata, check access entitlements, and retrieve full-text content in order to better support sharing
This document discusses evaluation in public relations, including how evaluation research can be used to develop programs and test messages. It describes how media monitoring services have evolved with digital technology, allowing expanded tracking and analysis of data. Key aspects of evaluation covered include message testing, media monitoring, metrics and analytics. The document also evaluates research practices using standards like the Barcelona Principles, which address goals, measurement, methodology, and ethics.
The journal publishing platform ARPHA, as presented in Moscow, Russia (2017) by Prof. Pavel Stoev.
Russian version available at: https://www.slideshare.net/pensoft/arpha-platform-presented-in-moscow-december-2017
The document discusses Nature Publishing Group's APIs and plans for an API developer portal:
1) Nature Publishing Group aims to provide quality scientific data through APIs to enable new applications and share ideas through a developer community on their upcoming developer portal.
2) Their API business model will have different access tiers for keyless public access, non-commercial developers, non-commercial reuse, and commercial developers.
3) Current APIs include an OpenSearch API and Blogs API, and future APIs planned are for article content, jobs, events, and research highlights.
A presentation on 'Publishing in Academic Journals – Tips to help you succeed' presented at the 2015 University of South Africa (Unisa) Authors Workshop organised by Unisa’s College of Graduate Studies and the Unisa Library
Researcher KnowHow: Introduction to bibliometrics with Charles MartinezLivUniLibrary
Charles Martinez delivered a session on Scopus, SciVal and bibliometrics published. It includes an in-depth look at using Scopus and how to track the impact of your research using SciVal. Charles also gave some words of advice about responsible use of metrics.
Defining true north metrics to quantify engagement at LinkedInBonnie Barrilleaux
This document discusses defining metrics to measure engagement on LinkedIn. It recommends developing a "true north" metric that measures the overall goal or member value proposition, along with supporting "signpost" metrics that provide faster feedback. Examples are given of metrics for content sharing that could be measured at different points in the user experience funnel. Key considerations for metrics include balancing complexity, keeping them actionable, focusing on important user groups, and relating metrics back to member value.
Are you ready to get read? Optimize your own publishing experience and impro...Max Haring
Dr. Max Haring gave a seminar about optimizing publishing experiences and impact. He discussed choosing the right journal by considering its focus, publication type, potential audience, and open access options. He also encouraged authors to improve discoverability through search engine optimization of titles and adding metadata. Finally, he advocated being open by publishing open access, engaging in collaborative writing, sharing research data and code, and using altmetrics and open peer review to increase impact.
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Electronic Collection ManagementSelena Killick
This document summarizes Selena Killick's presentation on evaluating big deal journal packages through qualitative and quantitative methods at Cranfield University. Cranfield University spends over £150 million annually, with 68% of its information expenditure going towards journal subscriptions in 2010-2011. Killick developed an approach using both quantitative metrics like downloads, costs, and usage trends, as well qualitative measures involving academic liaisons and analyzing reading lists and REF preferred journals. She created an Excel template to automate calculations from COUNTER and subscription data. The results helped inform collection decisions while justifying expenditures and demonstrating the value of resources.
Identifying and understanding research impact:
A comprehensive suite of metrics embedded throughout Scopus is designed to help facilitate evaluation and provide a better view of your research interests. Whether you are looking for metrics at the journal, article or author level, Scopus combines its sophisticated analytical capabilities with its unbiased and broad content coverage to help you build valuable insights.
Here we look at:
Author level metrics
Journal metrics
Article level metrics
Eric Mayer and Kathryn Eccles, Oxford Internet InstituteSarahFahmy
The document discusses methods for measuring the impact and usage of digital resources. It summarizes a study that looked at five JISC-funded projects to test impact measurement techniques. The study used both quantitative methods like webometrics, log file analysis, and bibliometrics as well as qualitative methods like interviews and focus groups. For each project, it analyzed awareness, usage patterns, citation practices, and user communities to understand how the resources were used and embedded within academic work. The document recommends considering impact from the start of a project and identifying connections to other resources and communities to help increase audience and impact.
A presentation by Kathryn Eccles and Eric Meyer to the JISC workshop 'Analysing Digital Audiences for First World War Digital Content' held on 06 Septmber 2011.
The New Dimensions in Scholcomm: How a global scholarly community collaborati...NASIG
Digital Science and 100+ global research institutions have spent the better part of the last two years collaborating to solve three distinct challenges in the existing research landscape:
* Research evaluation focuses almost exclusively on publications and citations data
* Research evaluation tools are siloed in proprietary applications that rarely speak to each other
* The gaps amongst proprietary data sources made generating a complete picture of impact extremely difficult (and expensive)
The goal of this collaboration amongst publishers, funders, research administrators, libraries, and Digital Science was to transform the research landscape by attempting to solve the problems resulting from expensive, siloed data research evaluation data.
1. The document summarizes the top 10 latest digital library trends according to Springer Nature, including institutional repositories and data management, open access, content sharing, ORCID, linked data and linked open data, alternative metrics, text data mining, marketing online resources, affordable textbooks, and ways to keep up with trends.
2. Trends include the growth of institutional repositories and libraries assisting with data management plans, open access publishing expanding through platforms like SpringerOpen and BiomedCentral, content sharing programs allowing researchers to share subscription content, and the use of ORCID identifiers to attribute work.
3. Emerging trends also involve linked data and linked open data to connect related information, alternative metrics to measure impact beyond
Importance of environment for online advertisingNewsworks
- Newsbrand and original content sites are highly trusted sources of digital news and information, more so than social media or other sites.
- Advertising is more effective and drives stronger consumer actions, like visits to advertiser websites, when placed on trusted newsbrand and original content sites compared to other online environments like social media or portals.
- Multiple studies show advertising on newsbrand and original content sites improves brand awareness, perception, favorability, and purchase intent more than advertising on less trusted general sites.
DH Week Workshop: Pinterest as ExhibitionNoreen Whysel
Pinterest offers a unique way to display and interrelate digital assets with a wider world of interconnected materials and activity. Learn how UK-based research group, Architecture_MPS promotes its journal articles, conferences and online resources by exposing it’s relationships with other research, exhibitions, and imagery. As part of our engagement with scholarly communication AMPS provides current listings supported by additional materials relevant to both academics and discipline information professionals. Since 2014, we have used Pinterest for curating collections of images and articles on topics related to our published journal articles. The boards function as a resource guide or reference to current books, films, exhibits, conferences, lectures and competitions related to the AMPS remit.
Location: METRO, 57 East 11th Street, 4th Floor Training Room
Free UKSG webinar - Altmetrics for Librarians: a publisher dashboard, a unive...Timon Oefelein
This two part webinar introduces the topic of altmetrics to the library community.
The first part of the session briefly defines the term before showing how Springer, a large global STM publisher, provides altmetric data for its journal articles and book content on the SpringerLink platform, to provide valuable and insightful data on the wider impact of published content.
The second part of the webinar provides an overview of how the Scholarly Communications Team at the University of Manchester Library has embedded altmetric support into their standard service to researchers and support staff.
Similar to Article level metrics - 1AM:London (20)
This presentation by Katharine Kemp, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law & Justice at UNSW Sydney, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Tim Capel, Director of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office Legal Service, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Why Psychological Safety Matters for Software Teams - ACE 2024 - Ben Linders.pdfBen Linders
Psychological safety in teams is important; team members must feel safe and able to communicate and collaborate effectively to deliver value. It’s also necessary to build long-lasting teams since things will happen and relationships will be strained.
But, how safe is a team? How can we determine if there are any factors that make the team unsafe or have an impact on the team’s culture?
In this mini-workshop, we’ll play games for psychological safety and team culture utilizing a deck of coaching cards, The Psychological Safety Cards. We will learn how to use gamification to gain a better understanding of what’s going on in teams. Individuals share what they have learned from working in teams, what has impacted the team’s safety and culture, and what has led to positive change.
Different game formats will be played in groups in parallel. Examples are an ice-breaker to get people talking about psychological safety, a constellation where people take positions about aspects of psychological safety in their team or organization, and collaborative card games where people work together to create an environment that fosters psychological safety.
Gamify it until you make it Improving Agile Development and Operations with ...Ben Linders
So many challenges, so little time. While we’re busy developing software and keeping it operational, we also need to sharpen the saw, but how? Gamification can be a way to look at how you’re doing and find out where to improve. It’s a great way to have everyone involved and get the best out of people.
In this presentation, Ben Linders will show how playing games with the DevOps coaching cards can help to explore your current development and deployment (DevOps) practices and decide as a team what to improve or experiment with.
The games that we play are based on an engagement model. Instead of imposing change, the games enable people to pull in ideas for change and apply those in a way that best suits their collective needs.
By playing games, you can learn from each other. Teams can use games, exercises, and coaching cards to discuss values, principles, and practices, and share their experiences and learnings.
Different game formats can be used to share experiences on DevOps principles and practices and explore how they can be applied effectively. This presentation provides an overview of playing formats and will inspire you to come up with your own formats.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Yong Lim, Professor of Economic Law at Seoul National University School of Law, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
1.) Introduction
Our Movement is not new; it is the same as it was for Freedom, Justice, and Equality since we were labeled as slaves. However, this movement at its core must entail economics.
2.) Historical Context
This is the same movement because none of the previous movements, such as boycotts, were ever completed. For some, maybe, but for the most part, it’s just a place to keep your stable until you’re ready to assimilate them into your system. The rest of the crabs are left in the world’s worst parts, begging for scraps.
3.) Economic Empowerment
Our Movement aims to show that it is indeed possible for the less fortunate to establish their economic system. Everyone else – Caucasian, Asian, Mexican, Israeli, Jews, etc. – has their systems, and they all set up and usurp money from the less fortunate. So, the less fortunate buy from every one of them, yet none of them buy from the less fortunate. Moreover, the less fortunate really don’t have anything to sell.
4.) Collaboration with Organizations
Our Movement will demonstrate how organizations such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Urban League, Black Lives Matter, and others can assist in creating a much more indestructible Black Wall Street.
5.) Vision for the Future
Our Movement will not settle for less than those who came before us and stopped before the rights were equal. The economy, jobs, healthcare, education, housing, incarceration – everything is unfair, and what isn’t is rigged for the less fortunate to fail, as evidenced in society.
6.) Call to Action
Our movement has started and implemented everything needed for the advancement of the economic system. There are positions for only those who understand the importance of this movement, as failure to address it will continue the degradation of the people deemed less fortunate.
No, this isn’t Noah’s Ark, nor am I a Prophet. I’m just a man who wrote a couple of books, created a magnificent website: http://www.thearkproject.llc, and who truly hopes to try and initiate a truly sustainable economic system for deprived people. We may not all have the same beliefs, but if our methods are tried, tested, and proven, we can come together and help others. My website: http://www.thearkproject.llc is very informative and considerably controversial. Please check it out, and if you are afraid, leave immediately; it’s no place for cowards. The last Prophet said: “Whoever among you sees an evil action, then let him change it with his hand [by taking action]; if he cannot, then with his tongue [by speaking out]; and if he cannot, then, with his heart – and that is the weakest of faith.” [Sahih Muslim] If we all, or even some of us, did this, there would be significant change. We are able to witness it on small and grand scales, for example, from climate control to business partnerships. I encourage, invite, and challenge you all to support me by visiting my website.
• For a full set of 530+ questions. Go to
https://skillcertpro.com/product/servicenow-cis-itsm-exam-questions/
• SkillCertPro offers detailed explanations to each question which helps to understand the concepts better.
• It is recommended to score above 85% in SkillCertPro exams before attempting a real exam.
• SkillCertPro updates exam questions every 2 weeks.
• You will get life time access and life time free updates
• SkillCertPro assures 100% pass guarantee in first attempt.
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
2. 1AM:London | 2014 | 2
• The importance of Article-level Metrics
• ALMs and Springer
• ALM team
• What does Springer do with ALMs
• What does Papers do with ALMs
• Conclusions & Outlook
Outline
Aknowledgements:
Ciaran O’Neill - BMC
Tanja Rossberg & Els Rens - Springer
Max Haring - SpringerPlus
Ben Blackburne & Matias Piipari - Papers
3. 1AM:London | 2014 | 3
Article published in a top-tier journal with ‘0’ citations after 2
years
Which article made a bigger impact?
Article published in a lower impact journal with tens of
citations
…
4. 1AM:London | 2014 | 4
Which article made a bigger impact?
Article with many citations
Article widely discussed in the social web
Article with lots of downloads
Article discussed on CNN
7. 1AM:London | 2014 | 7
Article level metrics present different ways to look at the
scientific community’s reaction to a publication, and could help:
• filter research for relevance, impact & quality
• give an alternative to the Impact Factor in assessing the impact
of research
• understand of how research findings are disseminated and
discovered
• research into the relationship of new article level metrics with
more traditional measures, i.e. citations
How could they be useful?
14. 1AM:London | 2014 | 14
Marketing
‘Translating’ article level metrics
data into attractive promotional
messages
Highlighting the top shared, cited,
downloaded articles of key journals
Highlights:
• NeuroStars
• Week of Citations
15. 1AM:London | 2014 | 15
NeuroStars
Now available: Quarterly NeuroStars
A permanent website on springer.com
presenting the top shared articles in
Neuroscience from Springer and BioMed
Central – updated on a quarterly basis
http://www.springer.com/neurostars
• The first ALM driven promotional campaign from
Springer, launched December 2012
• Campaign duration 2014: March 10-16, in time for
the Brain Awareness Week (jointly with BioMed
Central)
• Article selection: Top 15 shared, top cited, top
downloaded articles from all journals in the field
16. 1AM:London | 2014 | 16
Diversity of Citations Metrics
What is the impact of an article?
When assessing the impact of a published research article, it might seem logical to look
at the Impact Factor of the journal that you find it in. But as journals and scholars have
moved online, and citation indexing has been automated, the wealth of information for
citation discovery and analysis has vastly increased.
Citation counts can tell a more accurate story about the scholarly impact that an
individual article has made than the journal Impact Factor. But where should you look
for these counts? There are a number of indexing services tracking and providing
information about citations, each with advantages and disadvantages, spanning from
bias to discipline-dependence, and limitations of the citation data source.
17. 1AM:London | 2014 | 17
“HOW MANY CITATIONS DO YOU HAVE?”
An often heard question in the academic realm:
That depends on the platform! Let’s have a look…
18. 1AM:London | 2014 | 18
• A dedicated ALM website
informing our journal authors
and editors is available on
springer.com
Visit the Article-level metrics
site for journal authors and
editors
• eCampaign for Editor-in-Chief
• Author Zone newsletter
Informing our authors and editors about ALMs
19. 1AM:London | 2014 | 19
Editorial
Marketing
BioMed Central and SpringerOpen
IT Platform Development
Publishing Development
Academic/Government Marketing & Account Development
Corporate Marketing & Account Development
Author & Partner Marketing & Services
Market Intelligence & Webanalytics
Introducing the ALM virtual team
26. 1AM:London | 2014 | 26
• A more accurate evaluation of scholarly performance
• Show dissemination of an article through scholarly and non-
scholarly communication
• A new benchmark for employers, funders, potential
collaborators
• Provide filters to select those articles most relevant for their
work
Concluding – Article Level Metrics
Why do we think it's important? Use of article level metrics...
to assist in the efforts to move away from the use of journal level metrics like the Impact Factor of the journal a manuscript is published in as a proxy for assessing the quality or importance of a publication
to give a way for people to filter through large number of publications to find those of greatest impact and quality.
One way of thinking about the peer review process is that it is a acts as a way to filter research, bringing out the most interesting/important work.
Peer-review isn't always effective at this — typically the bulk of citations accrued by a journal are to a small number of articles. In this case it's much better to look at the number of citations that an individual article receives, as opposed to the average number of citations received by articles in the journal that the article has been published in (or the Impact Factor) - the Impact Factor of a journal isn't necessarily a good predictor of the number of citations each article receives. However citations take a long time to accrue, and other article level metrics might be able to give an indication of an article's impact a bit sooner.
The long term aim of article level metrics is to look at the scientific community's reaction to an article using article level metrics following publication — what they are looking at, how much an article is being discussed, and what's being said about — and finding ways to capture and represent the information to help people to navigate the research, and finding out what's of importance to them.
ALMs are important to individual scientists to assess their own output, and also for funding bodies etc. for use in research assessment activities.
Currently the way in which credit is given for publication to look at the Impact Factor of the publishing journal as an indication of the impact of the article —commonly hear that institutions research assessment only crediting research published in journals with an Impact Factor of whatever
ALMs can give an understanding of how research findings are disseminated and accessed
Research is ongoing to better understand the relationship of new article metrics with traditional measures, i.e. citations —some newer measures could provide an indication of the impact of a paper without an extensive lag time
Making the data available allows investigation of questions correlation between the different measures of impact — does wide coverage of an article on social media cites like twitter indicate eventual high number of citations..?
Single external user, requires access for collaboration with institution
Full text documents can not be stored in a secure Papers institutional environment for copyright and Information Security policy.
Links back to the documents can be stored
Either direct links to the item or via links to the item via link resolver (preferred method).
Access is web browser agnostic (IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
Yes
Adaptive or responsive design for multiple devices, device agnostic (Windows PC, iOS tablet or phone, Android tablet or phone devices).
Access is web browser agnostic (IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
Yes
Adaptive or responsive design for multiple devices, device agnostic (Windows PC, iOS tablet or phone, Android tablet or phone devices).
Access is web browser agnostic (IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
Yes
Adaptive or responsive design for multiple devices, device agnostic (Windows PC, iOS tablet or phone, Android tablet or phone devices).