ARTICLE CRITIQUE: 
By: Sarah Richer 
Lenski, Crawford, Crumplet and Stallworth compiled a five-year long study on 
diversity and differentiated instruction in the American education system. The 
findings were based within the second year of implementation. The purpose of the 
study was to find effective methods for future teachers to understand the value of 
many cultures and address cultural differences within their classrooms since 
research suggests that 90 percent of educators are Caucasian. The study included 
twenty-eight participants with a sub group of 6 preservice teachers who were 
interviewed. The interviews consisted of three formal and five informal interviews. 
Researchers also met bimonthly in order to discuss ongoing perceptions of data. 
The participants’ first steps included learning about ethnography and conducting 
participation observation in the school and within the surrounding community. 
Participants practiced creating descriptive observations and analyzing the data they 
compiled. Through repeated discussion and reflection papers, participants 
examined their own cultural beliefs and experiences which eventually led to the 
development of their own ethnographic paper. Participants were able to connect 
with a great understanding to a global world after being involved in numerous 
discussions and learning not only about other cultures, but also their own. The 
participants views about diversity shifted and data suggested that if teachers were 
more informed about cultures, they were able to develop a better plan for 
developing a more diverse teaching style. 
From the beginning of the paper, the problem of the study is thoroughly indicated 
with statistical analysis and relevant research. These additions help to clarify the 
significance of the issue and the importance to our education system. The study 
examines other research and recognizes that most studies on the topic have not 
used observational tools in order to learn about the diverse cultures and 
differentiated learning in education. I believe that the ability for participants to 
place themselves in authentic environments and gain experience directly connects 
to the study’s main purpose and helps the participants to extend their overall 
understanding. In my belief, it is this extension of understanding that aids in the 
long-term transformation in the participant’s actions. 
The data collected is of a qualitative nature and the ability to demonstrate teachers 
changing perceptions and developing attitudes is quite subjective. The study itself 
contained few participants compared to the actual population of educators and 
would have more reliable if completed with educators from different economic, 
social and cultural environments. The study that was discussed was based on the 
second year of study, which I think was still quite premature in the data collection 
stage. 
The researchers do not directly speak about their professional backgrounds but I 
assume that with their involvement in various universities and with the teaching of
the participants that the researchers qualifications coincide with the purpose and 
credibility of the overall study. 
The findings are transferable to other contexts and settings. The researchers ability 
to generalize and create assumptions created results that can be used in many 
education systems and even within other work places. As the World Wide Web 
grows and technology expands, communication becomes even more globalized 
effecting an abundance careers. 
At the end of the paper, I am still left wondering if the tools selected appropriately 
addressed educators on a whole, if more tools were needed to extend overall 
learning on all sides and what the teaching style of the participants would look like 
after their involvement? Overall, the study demonstrates a high level of organization 
and the procedures demonstrate the transformation of the participants 
understanding of diverse cultures illustrated through direct quotations from 
participant findings. 
REFERENCES: 
Lenski, S.D., Crawford, K., Crumpler, T. & Stallworth, C. (2005). Preparing Preservice 
Teachers in a Diverse World, Action in Teacher Education, 27(3), pp. 3-12 
Manassas, VA.

Article critique etec500

  • 1.
    ARTICLE CRITIQUE: By:Sarah Richer Lenski, Crawford, Crumplet and Stallworth compiled a five-year long study on diversity and differentiated instruction in the American education system. The findings were based within the second year of implementation. The purpose of the study was to find effective methods for future teachers to understand the value of many cultures and address cultural differences within their classrooms since research suggests that 90 percent of educators are Caucasian. The study included twenty-eight participants with a sub group of 6 preservice teachers who were interviewed. The interviews consisted of three formal and five informal interviews. Researchers also met bimonthly in order to discuss ongoing perceptions of data. The participants’ first steps included learning about ethnography and conducting participation observation in the school and within the surrounding community. Participants practiced creating descriptive observations and analyzing the data they compiled. Through repeated discussion and reflection papers, participants examined their own cultural beliefs and experiences which eventually led to the development of their own ethnographic paper. Participants were able to connect with a great understanding to a global world after being involved in numerous discussions and learning not only about other cultures, but also their own. The participants views about diversity shifted and data suggested that if teachers were more informed about cultures, they were able to develop a better plan for developing a more diverse teaching style. From the beginning of the paper, the problem of the study is thoroughly indicated with statistical analysis and relevant research. These additions help to clarify the significance of the issue and the importance to our education system. The study examines other research and recognizes that most studies on the topic have not used observational tools in order to learn about the diverse cultures and differentiated learning in education. I believe that the ability for participants to place themselves in authentic environments and gain experience directly connects to the study’s main purpose and helps the participants to extend their overall understanding. In my belief, it is this extension of understanding that aids in the long-term transformation in the participant’s actions. The data collected is of a qualitative nature and the ability to demonstrate teachers changing perceptions and developing attitudes is quite subjective. The study itself contained few participants compared to the actual population of educators and would have more reliable if completed with educators from different economic, social and cultural environments. The study that was discussed was based on the second year of study, which I think was still quite premature in the data collection stage. The researchers do not directly speak about their professional backgrounds but I assume that with their involvement in various universities and with the teaching of
  • 2.
    the participants thatthe researchers qualifications coincide with the purpose and credibility of the overall study. The findings are transferable to other contexts and settings. The researchers ability to generalize and create assumptions created results that can be used in many education systems and even within other work places. As the World Wide Web grows and technology expands, communication becomes even more globalized effecting an abundance careers. At the end of the paper, I am still left wondering if the tools selected appropriately addressed educators on a whole, if more tools were needed to extend overall learning on all sides and what the teaching style of the participants would look like after their involvement? Overall, the study demonstrates a high level of organization and the procedures demonstrate the transformation of the participants understanding of diverse cultures illustrated through direct quotations from participant findings. REFERENCES: Lenski, S.D., Crawford, K., Crumpler, T. & Stallworth, C. (2005). Preparing Preservice Teachers in a Diverse World, Action in Teacher Education, 27(3), pp. 3-12 Manassas, VA.