Arizona senate bill
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•258 views
SB 1070 requires immigrants to carry registration documents and makes transporting or sheltering illegal immigrants a state crime. The bill was passed in 2010 in Arizona to increase enforcement of immigration laws and deportation of undocumented immigrants. Supporters argued it was needed to address border security and human trafficking issues, while critics argued it would lead to racial profiling and harassment of Hispanics. The bill was also controversial due to its influence on private prison companies and impacts on Arizona's economy, schools, and relationship with Mexico.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![SB 1070 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement. Specifically, it reduced restrictions on searching communications and financial records and broadened the definition of terrorism. While intended to prevent further attacks, the Patriot Act has been criticized for compromising civil liberties and privacy in its application of expanded government powers. Overall, the document discusses the security versus liberty debate in the context of the Patriot Act and its impact on balancing those priorities after 9/11.
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in October 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Its stated purpose was to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies. Some key provisions included allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records like library records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist activities. The act was controversial due to concerns that it weakened civil liberties and increased government intrusion into people's privacy.
Usa Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act was passed in 2001 as a response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It made several controversial changes to surveillance laws that granted the government expanded powers to monitor communications and financial and medical records. While intended to help prevent terrorism, many felt certain provisions violated civil liberties and privacy protections. The act faced several legal challenges over its most controversial aspects and their application in cases of suspected but ultimately wrongful terrorism accusations.
Final presentation rev 1 - USA Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed 45 days after 9/11 to enhance domestic security and increase surveillance powers. It impacted laws around intelligence gathering, immigration, and more. While proponents argued it granted needed powers to fight terrorism, critics said it infringed on civil liberties. There have been ongoing legal challenges around its scope and application. As time has passed, there are calls to reevaluate the act and ensure powers are not abused.
Mea#4 1.1
The document discusses the history and impacts of the Patriot Act passed after 9/11. It summarizes that the Act allowed increased intelligence sharing but infringed on civil liberties. While security needed improving after 9/11, the government should not violate constitutional rights. A balance is needed to protect both liberty and security.
Patriot act summary
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by Congress in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It gives federal officials greater authority to track communications for counterterrorism purposes. It also increases the government's ability to monitor financial transactions and provides new criminal offenses and penalties related to terrorism. While providing some new safeguards, critics argue some provisions undermine civil liberties.
Nc Latest Ppt
The document discusses arguments around whether the Patriot Act should be repealed. It outlines perspectives from both sides of the debate. Proponents of the Patriot Act argue that it has helped fight terrorism and prosecute hundreds of terrorists, while maintaining civil liberties. Critics argue it infringes on constitutional rights like freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, and unfairly targets immigrants. Both sides cite examples to support their positions in this complex debate around national security, civil rights, and counterterrorism.
USA Patriot Act
This document is the text of H.R. 3162, also known as the USA PATRIOT Act, which was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Act aims to deter and punish terrorist acts by enhancing domestic security, surveillance procedures, and law enforcement investigative tools related to terrorism, computer fraud/abuse, and money laundering. It also aims to protect U.S. borders and preserve immigration benefits for victims of terrorism. The Act contains several titles that address these issues across 426 sections.
Recommended
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement. Specifically, it reduced restrictions on searching communications and financial records and broadened the definition of terrorism. While intended to prevent further attacks, the Patriot Act has been criticized for compromising civil liberties and privacy in its application of expanded government powers. Overall, the document discusses the security versus liberty debate in the context of the Patriot Act and its impact on balancing those priorities after 9/11.
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in October 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Its stated purpose was to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies. Some key provisions included allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records like library records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist activities. The act was controversial due to concerns that it weakened civil liberties and increased government intrusion into people's privacy.
Usa Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act was passed in 2001 as a response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It made several controversial changes to surveillance laws that granted the government expanded powers to monitor communications and financial and medical records. While intended to help prevent terrorism, many felt certain provisions violated civil liberties and privacy protections. The act faced several legal challenges over its most controversial aspects and their application in cases of suspected but ultimately wrongful terrorism accusations.
Final presentation rev 1 - USA Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed 45 days after 9/11 to enhance domestic security and increase surveillance powers. It impacted laws around intelligence gathering, immigration, and more. While proponents argued it granted needed powers to fight terrorism, critics said it infringed on civil liberties. There have been ongoing legal challenges around its scope and application. As time has passed, there are calls to reevaluate the act and ensure powers are not abused.
Mea#4 1.1
The document discusses the history and impacts of the Patriot Act passed after 9/11. It summarizes that the Act allowed increased intelligence sharing but infringed on civil liberties. While security needed improving after 9/11, the government should not violate constitutional rights. A balance is needed to protect both liberty and security.
Patriot act summary
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by Congress in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It gives federal officials greater authority to track communications for counterterrorism purposes. It also increases the government's ability to monitor financial transactions and provides new criminal offenses and penalties related to terrorism. While providing some new safeguards, critics argue some provisions undermine civil liberties.
Nc Latest Ppt
The document discusses arguments around whether the Patriot Act should be repealed. It outlines perspectives from both sides of the debate. Proponents of the Patriot Act argue that it has helped fight terrorism and prosecute hundreds of terrorists, while maintaining civil liberties. Critics argue it infringes on constitutional rights like freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, and unfairly targets immigrants. Both sides cite examples to support their positions in this complex debate around national security, civil rights, and counterterrorism.
USA Patriot Act
This document is the text of H.R. 3162, also known as the USA PATRIOT Act, which was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Act aims to deter and punish terrorist acts by enhancing domestic security, surveillance procedures, and law enforcement investigative tools related to terrorism, computer fraud/abuse, and money laundering. It also aims to protect U.S. borders and preserve immigration benefits for victims of terrorism. The Act contains several titles that address these issues across 426 sections.
Domestic Surveillance_ProsandCons
This document discusses the debate around national security surveillance by intelligence agencies. It presents arguments on both sides of the issue.
The pro argument is that intelligence agencies like the CIA and NSA play a vital role in national security and have helped prevent terrorist attacks since 9/11 through surveillance techniques. However, the con argument is that this surveillance infringes on Americans' right to privacy and civil liberties. Many feel their privacy is violated, and there is public mistrust of intelligence agencies due to past mistakes and covert actions. Additionally, some of this surveillance may violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Arizona effect
Arizona passed SB1070 in 2010, allowing law enforcement to question anyone's immigration status during stops. This made Arizona ground zero for immigration enforcement. A US District Court struck down parts of SB1070 as preempting federal law. Other states were inspired to pass similar laws, but are awaiting the outcome of lawsuits before introducing their own. Illegal immigration frustration is also seen in Italy, where governments have cracked down by demanding proof of legal status on public transit and banning new ethnic food outlets in some city centers.
Real estate owner search
The document discusses the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). It describes how President Theodore Roosevelt pushed for expanded law enforcement powers to protect the public. This led to the creation of the Bureau of Investigation in 1908 under the Department of Justice. Congress initially resisted funding a permanent investigative force but eventually approved funds in 1909. The Bureau was granted authority to investigate a wide range of federal crimes and was tasked with enforcing laws like the Mann Act regulating prostitution.
Hate crimes legislation in the u.s
The document discusses the history of hate crime legislation in the United States over several decades. It describes how early attempts at protection began with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and continued with subsequent laws such as the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990, the Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act, and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The most significant piece of legislation was the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, which expanded federal hate crime laws by removing certain requirements and providing protections for additional groups.
Hispanic immigration- Benson, Berry, Cooney, Stillwater
This document provides a brief history of U.S. immigration laws and policies from 1790 to present day. It discusses the establishment of immigration quotas and restrictions over time. It also outlines current legal immigration pathways including family-based, employment-based, and humanitarian categories. Additionally, it presents arguments for and against granting permanent residency status to illegal immigrants currently living in the U.S. While some argue it would benefit the economy and integration, most argue it would encourage more illegal immigration and strain social services. There is no clear consensus on the issue.
Student Presentation Assignment
Here are my thoughts on the USA Patriot Act:
- I believe national security is important, but government surveillance powers must be balanced with civil liberties protections. Some provisions of the Patriot Act gave security agencies broad authority with little oversight.
- If certain provisions were affecting my personal privacy or constitutional rights, I would want to see if legal challenges could limit the scope of those authorities or add more transparency and accountability.
- In the future, I think Congress should have an open debate on any extensions and consider input from experts on both sides. Narrowly tailored reforms may be needed to uphold security while also protecting civil liberties. A wholesale renewal or expansion without review may go too far.
Overall it's a complex issue
The actual countries to each constitution
The document discusses censorship and restrictions on civil liberties in China and North Korea. In China, freedom of speech is guaranteed by the constitution but critical speech is often punished using anti-subversion laws. The internet is heavily censored and protests are only allowed in approved areas. North Korea is considered the most repressive regime, with mandatory daily broadcasts praising the leader and no tolerance for protests or dissent. Germany had a progressive constitution from 1919-1945 but the Nazis quickly suspended civil rights using emergency powers after rising to power.
PATRIOT.Act.Essay3
The document discusses the USA PATRIOT Act passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It argues that while the act was meant to give law enforcement more power to fight terrorism, it eliminated some civil liberties protected by the Bill of Rights. Specifically, it allows for increased government surveillance, monitoring of communications and financial transactions, and indefinite detention of U.S. citizens designated as "enemy combatants" without due process. While supporters argue these are necessary to prevent terrorism, critics say the act was rushed into law, broadly defines terrorism, and weakens checks and balances by expanding executive power at the expense of privacy, free speech, and right to fair trial protections in the Constitution.
ARTICLE III - Sections11-16
Article III of the Philippine Constitution recognizes and protects fundamental individual rights, including due process, equal protection, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, right to privacy, free speech, and peaceful assembly. It outlines specific rights of the accused such as right to bail, speedy trial, protection against self-incrimination, prohibition of ex post facto laws and double jeopardy. The article also guarantees access to courts, habeas corpus, and speedy disposition of cases.
Summary Bill or RIGHTS Article 3 Section 1-22
The document summarizes the Bill of Rights section of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. It outlines 22 sections that establish various rights and protections for people, including the right to life, liberty, and property; freedom of speech; freedom of religion; rights of the accused such as due process and speedy trial; prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment; and protections against double jeopardy and ex post facto laws. Sections 1-11 establish various civil and political rights, while Sections 12-22 outline additional rights for those who have been accused of crimes.
Article 3 (sec 8-10)
The document summarizes key sections of the 1987 Philippine Constitution relating to individual rights and limitations on state power. It outlines the rights to form associations (Section 8), private property (Section 9), and sanctity of contracts (Section 10). Private property is subject to eminent domain with just compensation and due process. Contracts cannot be applied retroactively. Due process requires any deprivation of life, liberty, or property to be done under a valid law through fair procedures, including requiring warrants for search and arrest.
Schmalleger, The Bill of Rights
The document discusses the Bill of Rights and some of its key amendments. It summarizes the first ten amendments, which protect freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, bear arms, prohibit unreasonable search and seizure and cruel punishment, guarantee rights of the accused such as speedy trial and representation, and ensure that powers not granted to the federal government belong to the states. It also discusses the 14th Amendment guaranteeing citizenship and equal protection under the law. Finally, it summarizes the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright which established the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford it.
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
The plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, is filing a complaint on behalf of himself and other African Americans against the United States for harms stemming from slavery. The complaint provides historical context on the evolution of indentured servitude and racialized chattel slavery in the U.S. It asserts that political compromises to protect the institution of slavery violated the rights of African Americans and led to their mistreatment. The complaint seeks monetary compensation for harms including wrongful deaths, beatings, and the denial of freedom and dignity to the plaintiffs and their ancestors.
Amendments for consideration
The document summarizes key clauses from the US Constitution and amendments that guarantee civil liberties and rights. It includes clauses protecting habeas corpus, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, right to privacy, due process, right to a fair trial, and equal protection under the law.
NOT FOR KIDS: Senator Hatch Amnesty Bill: Open Borders means Drugs, Sex slav...
I shared this power point with Sharon Garn, in Senator Orrin Hatch's office regarding the perilous situation our government seems intent decade after decade to force upon us. This slide show is self explanatory. The status quo will get worse because we allow them to get away with it. Traitors in office and weak and cowardly corrupt representation have given us our current situation but we voted for it. Our governent is our biggest threat. Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson said America could be destroyed from with in. If it weren't for the enemy within the enemy without would have no promise.
Ashcroft Defends DOJ's Post-9/11 Policies
Former Attorney General John Ashcroft told lawmakers Thursday that he fully embraced pushing forward...
Bill of rights (lecture 3)
The document discusses several sections of the Bill of Rights in the 1987 Philippine Constitution as explained by the lecturer Mr. John Torres. It covers the right to privacy of communication, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion, and liberty of abode. Key rights discussed include freedom from unreasonable searches, freedom of speech and press, separation of church and state, and freedom of movement. Exceptions and limitations to some of these rights are also mentioned.
American gov
The document discusses the concepts of security, liberty, and the Patriot Act. It defines security as protection from harm and liberty as individuals having control over their own actions. It explains that the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies to gather intelligence and monitor financial transactions as well as immigration. The document concludes that liberty can be maintained with security as long as the security laws do not interfere with individual rights and activities, but that security can become a form of permanent oppression, as demonstrated by the Patriot Act, if it is used as a way to control people under the guise of protecting them.
Current event. Afghanistan protests on UN.
Hundreds of protesters in Afghanistan stormed a UN compound after hearing reports that a Quran had been burned at a church in Florida. The Quran is the Muslim holy book. During the attack, 12 people were killed including 4 international security guards and 3 UN workers. The protest may inspire further violence against international groups in Afghanistan and influence future conflicts between Afghanistan and other countries. The UN will have to reevaluate its strategies in Afghanistan going forward.
ebusiness
The document discusses hypothesis testing and introduces key concepts such as:
1) The null and alternative hypotheses for testing differences in means.
2) How to calculate a p-value and use it to reject the null hypothesis based on a significance level.
3) How to calculate a t-statistic and use t-tables to test hypotheses when sample sizes are small.
4) How confidence intervals are related to hypothesis tests and contain the true population parameter a certain percentage of the time.
Arizona senate bill
SB 1070 requires immigrants to carry registration documents and makes transporting or sheltering illegal immigrants a state crime. The bill was passed in 2010 in Arizona to increase enforcement of immigration laws and deportation of undocumented immigrants. Supporters argued it was needed to address border security and human trafficking issues, while critics argued it would lead to racial profiling and harassment of Hispanics. The bill was also controversial due to its influence on private prison companies and impacts on Arizona's economy, schools, and relationship with Mexico.
My life
Ebony Davison was born on October 18, 1995 in Akron, Ohio where she continues to live with her mother, father, and grandmother. She has two brothers and three sisters and enjoys spending time with her large, close-knit family. In her spare time, Ebony likes to text, talk on the phone, play basketball, and hang out with family and friends. Her favorite hobby is basketball and she hopes to attend Michigan State University after graduating high school, where she aims to get good grades and stay out of trouble as part of pursuing her goals.
More Related Content
What's hot
Domestic Surveillance_ProsandCons
This document discusses the debate around national security surveillance by intelligence agencies. It presents arguments on both sides of the issue.
The pro argument is that intelligence agencies like the CIA and NSA play a vital role in national security and have helped prevent terrorist attacks since 9/11 through surveillance techniques. However, the con argument is that this surveillance infringes on Americans' right to privacy and civil liberties. Many feel their privacy is violated, and there is public mistrust of intelligence agencies due to past mistakes and covert actions. Additionally, some of this surveillance may violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Arizona effect
Arizona passed SB1070 in 2010, allowing law enforcement to question anyone's immigration status during stops. This made Arizona ground zero for immigration enforcement. A US District Court struck down parts of SB1070 as preempting federal law. Other states were inspired to pass similar laws, but are awaiting the outcome of lawsuits before introducing their own. Illegal immigration frustration is also seen in Italy, where governments have cracked down by demanding proof of legal status on public transit and banning new ethnic food outlets in some city centers.
Real estate owner search
The document discusses the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). It describes how President Theodore Roosevelt pushed for expanded law enforcement powers to protect the public. This led to the creation of the Bureau of Investigation in 1908 under the Department of Justice. Congress initially resisted funding a permanent investigative force but eventually approved funds in 1909. The Bureau was granted authority to investigate a wide range of federal crimes and was tasked with enforcing laws like the Mann Act regulating prostitution.
Hate crimes legislation in the u.s
The document discusses the history of hate crime legislation in the United States over several decades. It describes how early attempts at protection began with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and continued with subsequent laws such as the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990, the Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act, and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The most significant piece of legislation was the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, which expanded federal hate crime laws by removing certain requirements and providing protections for additional groups.
Hispanic immigration- Benson, Berry, Cooney, Stillwater
This document provides a brief history of U.S. immigration laws and policies from 1790 to present day. It discusses the establishment of immigration quotas and restrictions over time. It also outlines current legal immigration pathways including family-based, employment-based, and humanitarian categories. Additionally, it presents arguments for and against granting permanent residency status to illegal immigrants currently living in the U.S. While some argue it would benefit the economy and integration, most argue it would encourage more illegal immigration and strain social services. There is no clear consensus on the issue.
Student Presentation Assignment
Here are my thoughts on the USA Patriot Act:
- I believe national security is important, but government surveillance powers must be balanced with civil liberties protections. Some provisions of the Patriot Act gave security agencies broad authority with little oversight.
- If certain provisions were affecting my personal privacy or constitutional rights, I would want to see if legal challenges could limit the scope of those authorities or add more transparency and accountability.
- In the future, I think Congress should have an open debate on any extensions and consider input from experts on both sides. Narrowly tailored reforms may be needed to uphold security while also protecting civil liberties. A wholesale renewal or expansion without review may go too far.
Overall it's a complex issue
The actual countries to each constitution
The document discusses censorship and restrictions on civil liberties in China and North Korea. In China, freedom of speech is guaranteed by the constitution but critical speech is often punished using anti-subversion laws. The internet is heavily censored and protests are only allowed in approved areas. North Korea is considered the most repressive regime, with mandatory daily broadcasts praising the leader and no tolerance for protests or dissent. Germany had a progressive constitution from 1919-1945 but the Nazis quickly suspended civil rights using emergency powers after rising to power.
PATRIOT.Act.Essay3
The document discusses the USA PATRIOT Act passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It argues that while the act was meant to give law enforcement more power to fight terrorism, it eliminated some civil liberties protected by the Bill of Rights. Specifically, it allows for increased government surveillance, monitoring of communications and financial transactions, and indefinite detention of U.S. citizens designated as "enemy combatants" without due process. While supporters argue these are necessary to prevent terrorism, critics say the act was rushed into law, broadly defines terrorism, and weakens checks and balances by expanding executive power at the expense of privacy, free speech, and right to fair trial protections in the Constitution.
ARTICLE III - Sections11-16
Article III of the Philippine Constitution recognizes and protects fundamental individual rights, including due process, equal protection, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, right to privacy, free speech, and peaceful assembly. It outlines specific rights of the accused such as right to bail, speedy trial, protection against self-incrimination, prohibition of ex post facto laws and double jeopardy. The article also guarantees access to courts, habeas corpus, and speedy disposition of cases.
Summary Bill or RIGHTS Article 3 Section 1-22
The document summarizes the Bill of Rights section of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. It outlines 22 sections that establish various rights and protections for people, including the right to life, liberty, and property; freedom of speech; freedom of religion; rights of the accused such as due process and speedy trial; prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment; and protections against double jeopardy and ex post facto laws. Sections 1-11 establish various civil and political rights, while Sections 12-22 outline additional rights for those who have been accused of crimes.
Article 3 (sec 8-10)
The document summarizes key sections of the 1987 Philippine Constitution relating to individual rights and limitations on state power. It outlines the rights to form associations (Section 8), private property (Section 9), and sanctity of contracts (Section 10). Private property is subject to eminent domain with just compensation and due process. Contracts cannot be applied retroactively. Due process requires any deprivation of life, liberty, or property to be done under a valid law through fair procedures, including requiring warrants for search and arrest.
Schmalleger, The Bill of Rights
The document discusses the Bill of Rights and some of its key amendments. It summarizes the first ten amendments, which protect freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, bear arms, prohibit unreasonable search and seizure and cruel punishment, guarantee rights of the accused such as speedy trial and representation, and ensure that powers not granted to the federal government belong to the states. It also discusses the 14th Amendment guaranteeing citizenship and equal protection under the law. Finally, it summarizes the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright which established the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford it.
Louis charles hamilton ii. amend united states...
The plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, is filing a complaint on behalf of himself and other African Americans against the United States for harms stemming from slavery. The complaint provides historical context on the evolution of indentured servitude and racialized chattel slavery in the U.S. It asserts that political compromises to protect the institution of slavery violated the rights of African Americans and led to their mistreatment. The complaint seeks monetary compensation for harms including wrongful deaths, beatings, and the denial of freedom and dignity to the plaintiffs and their ancestors.
Amendments for consideration
The document summarizes key clauses from the US Constitution and amendments that guarantee civil liberties and rights. It includes clauses protecting habeas corpus, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, right to privacy, due process, right to a fair trial, and equal protection under the law.
NOT FOR KIDS: Senator Hatch Amnesty Bill: Open Borders means Drugs, Sex slav...
I shared this power point with Sharon Garn, in Senator Orrin Hatch's office regarding the perilous situation our government seems intent decade after decade to force upon us. This slide show is self explanatory. The status quo will get worse because we allow them to get away with it. Traitors in office and weak and cowardly corrupt representation have given us our current situation but we voted for it. Our governent is our biggest threat. Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson said America could be destroyed from with in. If it weren't for the enemy within the enemy without would have no promise.
Ashcroft Defends DOJ's Post-9/11 Policies
Former Attorney General John Ashcroft told lawmakers Thursday that he fully embraced pushing forward...
Bill of rights (lecture 3)
The document discusses several sections of the Bill of Rights in the 1987 Philippine Constitution as explained by the lecturer Mr. John Torres. It covers the right to privacy of communication, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion, and liberty of abode. Key rights discussed include freedom from unreasonable searches, freedom of speech and press, separation of church and state, and freedom of movement. Exceptions and limitations to some of these rights are also mentioned.
American gov
The document discusses the concepts of security, liberty, and the Patriot Act. It defines security as protection from harm and liberty as individuals having control over their own actions. It explains that the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies to gather intelligence and monitor financial transactions as well as immigration. The document concludes that liberty can be maintained with security as long as the security laws do not interfere with individual rights and activities, but that security can become a form of permanent oppression, as demonstrated by the Patriot Act, if it is used as a way to control people under the guise of protecting them.
What's hot (18)
Hispanic immigration- Benson, Berry, Cooney, Stillwater
Hispanic immigration- Benson, Berry, Cooney, Stillwater
NOT FOR KIDS: Senator Hatch Amnesty Bill: Open Borders means Drugs, Sex slav...
NOT FOR KIDS: Senator Hatch Amnesty Bill: Open Borders means Drugs, Sex slav...
Viewers also liked
Current event. Afghanistan protests on UN.
Hundreds of protesters in Afghanistan stormed a UN compound after hearing reports that a Quran had been burned at a church in Florida. The Quran is the Muslim holy book. During the attack, 12 people were killed including 4 international security guards and 3 UN workers. The protest may inspire further violence against international groups in Afghanistan and influence future conflicts between Afghanistan and other countries. The UN will have to reevaluate its strategies in Afghanistan going forward.
ebusiness
The document discusses hypothesis testing and introduces key concepts such as:
1) The null and alternative hypotheses for testing differences in means.
2) How to calculate a p-value and use it to reject the null hypothesis based on a significance level.
3) How to calculate a t-statistic and use t-tables to test hypotheses when sample sizes are small.
4) How confidence intervals are related to hypothesis tests and contain the true population parameter a certain percentage of the time.
Arizona senate bill
SB 1070 requires immigrants to carry registration documents and makes transporting or sheltering illegal immigrants a state crime. The bill was passed in 2010 in Arizona to increase enforcement of immigration laws and deportation of undocumented immigrants. Supporters argued it was needed to address border security and human trafficking issues, while critics argued it would lead to racial profiling and harassment of Hispanics. The bill was also controversial due to its influence on private prison companies and impacts on Arizona's economy, schools, and relationship with Mexico.
My life
Ebony Davison was born on October 18, 1995 in Akron, Ohio where she continues to live with her mother, father, and grandmother. She has two brothers and three sisters and enjoys spending time with her large, close-knit family. In her spare time, Ebony likes to text, talk on the phone, play basketball, and hang out with family and friends. Her favorite hobby is basketball and she hopes to attend Michigan State University after graduating high school, where she aims to get good grades and stay out of trouble as part of pursuing her goals.
Textos dialogados
Este documento describe las características de los textos dialogados. Explica que el diálogo es la base de las relaciones sociales y que puede ser espontáneo o planificado. Además, señala que en los textos escritos el diálogo intenta recrear la espontaneidad de las conversaciones orales y que las principales características de los textos dialogados son la naturalidad, agilidad y expresividad.
FLORA CREATIONS
This document lists the names of various jewelry and gemstone trade shows including the HK Jewellery and Gem Fair, IIJS Show, China International Gold Jewellery and Gem Fair, Hongkong International Jewellery show 2011, and HONG KONG Show. It appears to be a record of trade show attendance or involvement for a company involved in the jewelry industry.
Ewg Pallet Presentation
The document discusses a new type of nestable plastic pallet with runners. It is a one-piece construction which provides advantages over traditional wooden pallets and other plastic pallets including lower costs, easier production, reduced storage needs, safer operation, and recyclability. It is positioned as offering significant value and benefits to customers through paradigm-changing pallet design.
Stretch Wrap Alternatives Fact Sheet
We are seeking an environmentally friendly alternative to stretch films for our distribution process. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Viewers also liked (8)
Similar to Arizona senate bill
SB 1070 vs. Genocide
SB 1070 is an Arizona state law that allows law enforcement to check immigration status during lawful stops if there is reasonable suspicion of illegal status. It requires immigrants to carry registration documents and allows citizens to sue if they believe authorities are not enforcing immigration laws. Supporters argue it will reduce illegal immigration and crime, while opponents believe it will lead to racial profiling and civil rights violations. The law has been compared to Nazi policies that required ID badges and the internment of Jews.
Hr4437
H.R. 4437 is a controversial bill that aims to strengthen immigration enforcement and border security. It proposes making unlawful presence in the U.S. a felony and punishing individuals and organizations that assist undocumented immigrants. The bill passed in the House but faces opposition in the Senate. Hundreds of thousands have protested the bill nationwide, arguing it is too harsh. Supporters believe the bill will help secure borders and enforce immigration laws, while critics argue it criminalizes immigrants and gives the government too much authority.
The Controversy Surrounding H.R. 4437
H.R. 4437 is a bill that aims to strengthen immigration enforcement and border security. It proposes making unlawful presence in the U.S. a felony, detaining immigrants and asylum seekers until they are deported, and imposing criminal penalties on those who help undocumented immigrants. The bill passed in the House but faces opposition in its proposals to detain immigrants indefinitely and eliminate programs that grant citizenship. The bill's passage sparked large nationwide protests from immigration advocates and student walkouts.
Legalized Racism
This document discusses Arizona's new immigration law and opposing views on it. It summarizes arguments that the law will lead to racial profiling and civil rights violations. However, it also notes that Mexico has very restrictive immigration laws, including penalties for unauthorized entry and limiting foreign land ownership near borders. While some say Mexico is hypocritical to criticize Arizona's law, others argue the Mexican president has a right to defend Mexican citizens living in the US. The document provides options for readers to take action against the Arizona law through protests, boycotts, and legal challenges.
Web template
This document discusses Arizona's new immigration law and opposing views on it. It summarizes arguments that the law will lead to racial profiling and violations of civil rights. However, it also notes that Mexico has very restrictive immigration laws, including penalties for unauthorized entry and limiting foreign ownership of property near borders. While Mexico objects to the Arizona law, experts argue their own immigration policies hurt economic development and are not accommodating to foreigners. The document encourages readers to take actions like boycotts and protests to oppose the Arizona law as a social injustice.
Tok Presentation
This document discusses whether deportation policies and procedures in the United States are ethical. It outlines the history of deportation laws and conflicting views on the issue. Some believe current policies are too harsh and violate rights, while others believe they are not harsh enough. The media, statistics, and human sciences are areas that influence perceptions on both sides of the debate. Ultimately, reason, emotion, and personal experiences shape individual beliefs on this complex issue.
Arizona SB1070
SB 1070 allows Arizona law enforcement to question the immigration status of anyone they stop for a possible violation. The law was passed in 2010 by the state legislature and signed by Governor Jan Brewer. It is controversial and has faced legal challenges for enabling racial profiling. Protests against the law occurred across the US and some organizations called for boycotts of Arizona. Within a month of being signed, two lawsuits were filed against SB 1070 claiming it would require police to violate the civil rights of Hispanics.
Surname 1Surname 8Student’s NameCourse Name25 February.docx
Surname 1
Surname 8
Student’s Name
Course Name
25 February, 2013
American Immigration Policy and Legislation
The United States Senate prepared a bill in the year 2007 meant to address the problem of illegal immigrants and those that were not documented (Kenny 92). The bill aimed at tightening border security and later opening a path for immigrants to acquire citizenship. Since then, immigration policy and legislation in the United States of America has risen, and many debates have been witnessed. Immigration is such a sensitive issue in the politics of the United States of America requiring proper legislation procedures to be formulated. History shows that most people living in America are descendants of immigrants or slaves who migrated to the country in the course of last 400 years. This excludes the Native Americans who are considered as original people who lived in the U.S.
In former times, the government of U.S. allowed the immigrants to settle in an expanded territory. This was later changed by the outbreak of civil wars that required from each state to enact immigration laws. Most of the early initial immigration laws were introduced to control the composition of the general United States population. Several policies and laws of immigration to U.S. were passed by the Congress. Consequently, the concerns about border security increased, and immigration laws were further shifted to address the issue. This paper explores deeply the American legislation and policies of immigration. In particular, the introduction of reforms in immigration department by President Obama takes the center of the discussion with focus on the new bill yet to be presented to the Congress.
Policy and Legislation of U.S. Immigration
The White House currently has plans of implementing new immigration policies while considering the need to reinforce the existing immigration laws as proposed by the Republicans. The three major proposals circulating in the U.S. Congress now are based on border security, possible path for an immigrant to become a legal U.S. citizen, and special status of agricultural workers. President Obama together with Democrats and some Republicans in the Congress is currently working on an immigration bill incorporating all the three issues. The matter has caused debates among the Republicans and Democrats extending to the whole nation. The need to reinforce the existing laws and enact new ones was the main subject in these debates. As a result, the legislators formed a committee to review and suggest proper immigration laws.
Possible Path to Citizenship for Unauthorized Workers Residing in the U.S.
The government of the USA is reviewing the possibility to enact a new immigration law seeking to allow illegitimate immigrants currently staying in the country to become legitimate citizens. The bill gives a clear timeline of 8 years for an immigrant to become a United States citizen. The estimated eleven million immigrants are expected to receive ...
Essay About Illegal Immigration
Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈
✅ Quality
You get an original and high-quality paper based on extensive research. The completed work will be correctly formatted, referenced and tailored to your level of study.
✅ Confidentiality
We value your privacy. We do not disclose your personal information to any third party without your consent. Your payment data is also safely handled as you process the payment through a secured and verified payment processor.
✅ Originality
Every single order we deliver is written from scratch according to your instructions. We have zero tolerance for plagiarism, so all completed papers are unique and checked for plagiarism using a leading plagiarism detector.
✅ On-time delivery
We strive to deliver quality custom written papers before the deadline. That's why you don't have to worry about missing the deadline for submitting your assignment.
✅ Free revisions
You can ask to revise your paper as many times as you need until you're completely satisfied with the result. Provide notes about what needs to be changed, and we'll change it right away.
✅ 24/7 Support
From answering simple questions to solving any possible issues, we're always here to help you in chat and on the phone. We've got you covered at any time, day or night.
Those who violate the terms of legal entry. It is now clear that the “Non-immigrant Visa Overstayer”, “Border Crossing Card.. Immigration Reform is a political attempt to change a country's immigration laws. The Trump administration has had one goal clear from the beginning: .... 1. 1. 1986 ... Hence the returns or benefits that accrue to illegal immigrants would fall. Presumably the number of undocumented migrants would fall along with .... 27. 4. 2011 ... Tighter border enforcement deters illegal migration of prospective workers, but decreases return migration. In the second chapter I estimate the .... This phenomenon is not new and thousands of illegal immigrants have come into US through either the Mexico border, the Pacific Ocean, or through many other ways .... An Illegal Alien. Tamara Larkin Street Youth Services / San Francicso Community College Sponsoring Station: KQED, San Francisco.. 4. 2. 2023 ... Illegal immigration refers to undocumented migration of people into a county in violation of the according immigration laws of that country.. For americans with the alien. 8 immigrants have you from this product. Online illegal immigration research titles that the complexity of. View essay. Immigrants .... Illegal immigration is near record lows, with migrant apprehensions along the Southwest border at levels last seen in the 1970s. Temporary work-based visas .... State and municipal immigration regulations are problematic for documented and undocumented immigrants and U.S. citizens, and raise preemption challenges ...
Info on Undocumented Immigrants
The document discusses several myths and facts related to undocumented immigration to the United States. It notes that undocumented immigrants are not criminals for being in the country without documentation, and provides statistics on the undocumented immigrant population in the US. It also discusses the economic impacts of immigration and costs associated with immigration enforcement policies.
Essay About Illegal Immigration
Illegal Immigration Speech Essay
Illegal Immigration Essay
Essay about Illegal Immigrants: Amnesty
Essay On Illegal Immigration
Undocumented Immigration
The document discusses issues related to undocumented immigration and human rights violations against immigrants. It describes how over 10 million undocumented immigrants currently live in the US, fleeing persecution or seeking better opportunities. However, many face abuse, including sexual harassment, physical threats, and dangerous conditions. The document examines mistreatment by border patrol, coyotes, and employers. It argues for reform and increased protections to prevent future human rights violations against immigrants.
Business Law notes to study
The document discusses the debate around immigration reform in the United States. It provides background on illegal immigration and discusses proposals like the DREAM Act to provide paths to citizenship. The main topic is President Obama's planned executive action to reform immigration policy by expanding protections from deportation and work permits to millions of undocumented immigrants, including parents of citizens. Critics argue this oversteps executive authority and could encourage more illegal immigration.
Two Sides of the Same Coin - the Connection Between Legal and Illegal Immigra...
Two Sides of the Same Coin - the Connection Between Legal and Illegal Immigra...Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
Backgrounder on the connection between legal and illegal immigration by James R. Edwards, Jr.; Center for Immigration Studies, February 2006.Argumentative Essay About Immigration
This argumentative essay discusses immigration policy in the United States. It argues that President Trump's decision to repeal DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) is unconstitutional because it violates the 14th Amendment and concepts of citizenship. The 14th Amendment defines that everyone within U.S. borders is protected, regardless of legal status. While some argue that DACA overstepped presidential powers, revoking it violates the rights of Dreamers who have lived in the U.S. most of their lives. The essay maintains that the U.S. was founded by immigrants and has long welcomed people from diverse backgrounds, so restricting protections for undocumented people goes against American principles.
IntroductionThis paper will analyze the author’s claims, reasons.docx
Introduction
This paper will analyze the author’s claims, reasons and evidence for The Border to determine if the argument is effective in persuading the target audience.
First at all, we have to provide the context about the primary arguments that author highlight in article, a lot of Mexican try to cross border illegally that cause a tidal wave through United States. The 200,000 Mexicans were attempting to immigrate by illegal way that have raise by author as evidence to support the arguments. There are various of situation that have been caused by the illegally immigration; meanwhile, the author present an argument that US citizens now face many troubles coming from illegal immigration such job losing and safety problems, they believe that the political leader of government have to do something to restrict the influx from illegal immigration.(paragraph3,5,7) On the other hand, the political leader of government said that restriction of immigration seem to retard the economy growth.( paragraph6).
A statement of the claim/reason of “The Border.”
The author main claim is that the issue have been raise between citizenry and political leader of government because they conflict on different political opinions for illegally immigration, and that is the reason why border issue can’t be settled. Author provides the following reasons to support the claim: the gap is that generated from illegal immigration because different opinion between citizenry and political leader of government such regulation as opposed to restriction for border.
A discussion of the general context, authors’ purpose and authors’ audience
Author purpose is to make the reader aware the differences of opinions which between citizenry and U.S political leader, meanwhile what they might face due to illegally immigration, in order to let the reader understand that what are some of potential influences of illegal immigration they will actually deal with. Author establishes a formal and analytical tone with audiences who might suffer from illegal immigration, the evidence that author provide can make the assumption more powerful like the statistic and examples. Author provide that 58 percent of surveyed people believe Mexico is the sources of territory and refer to evidence for citizen. Otherwise, the evidence of “guest work” are used to support the points of political leader.
Evaluation of supporting evidence:
Author argue that the illegal immigration lead the potential political conflict between different point of view for citizenry and leader of US. The author claim is support by the use of some statistic data and research , the statistic present that they are around 485000 Mexican have crossed the border illegally since 2000 and they are 687 border agent has been attacked by illegal border crosser. This evidence is effective to support the popular’s and have to implement the stringent reform for ensure the American citizen safety. However, the government provide that the immig.
Racial profiling ppt
The document discusses how laws intended to protect national security and enforce immigration can be abused and lead to racial profiling and inequality. It provides examples of immigration laws throughout American history that discriminated against non-white groups. While laws like Stop and Frisk and post-9/11 security measures had good intentions, they also gave power to law enforcement that could infringe on civil liberties and target minority groups disproportionately. The document argues that racial profiling has been a problem in the application of laws around national security, immigration, and police stops from the founding of the US to the present day.
USA Backlash against Anti-Immigration
The document discusses the history of immigration to the United States over the past 400 years. It describes how immigrants from Europe laid the foundations for early colonial settlements and how subsequent waves brought Germans, Irish, Italians and others fleeing conflict. While immigration has long been a part of American history, the document notes there have also been periods of anti-immigrant sentiment and laws passed restricting immigration from certain countries. It discusses the contemporary debates around immigration, including arguments that immigrants are both economic and fiscal burdens, as well as contributions to the economy.
Running head EMERGING ISSUES HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE1EMERGING.docx
Running head: EMERGING ISSUES: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 1
EMERGING ISSUES: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 9
Emerging Issues: Historical Perspective
Peter Odhiambo
Introduction to Public Policy Analysis – PAD 510
Strayer University
October 24, 2016
Emerging issues: Historical Perspective
Introduction
Immigration policy has been an ongoing subject of congressional attention for many years and a topic of concern for majority of U.S. citizens.50,000 slaves smuggled in the United States became the first "Illegal Aliens" when foreign slave trade became illegal in 1808. Prior to this period, the authors of the US Constitution gave full protection to foreign slave trade, which at that time was a major source of immigration. They prohibited interference with the trade for twenty years, and either the domestic slave trade or slavery itself was interfered with, after the trade was made illegal by Congress, at President Jefferson's invitation, when that period expired. (Daniels, 2004). Today, the United States is experiencing an influx of illegal immigration than any period in its history. It is estimated that 850,000 new illegal immigrants arrive in the country each year, with Mexico leading the pack with 59% of the country's total (Center for Immigration Studies, 2015).
This paper discusses the historical perspective of the time when the illegal immigration policy was implemented, highlighting the problem and urgency of the policy and analyzing the social, economic and political environments for the time the policy was implemented. It further critiques the policy for its effectiveness over time, as well as identifying emerging issues for further policy development.
Discuss the historical perspective of the time when the policy was implemented
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) captured Amnesty and enforcement as the two major facets of this legislation. One of two stipulations was necessary for an alien to be granted amnesty by IRCA. The applicants must have resided in the United States continually since January 1982 or had completed 90 days of agricultural work between May 1985 and May 1986. (Center for Immigration Studies, 2015). Approximately 3 million people, comprising 94% of all applicants, gained legal status through this initiative. The illegal Immigrant Reform Act and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA)was passed by the Congress in 1996. The act beefed up border controls by ensuring the engagement of more Border Patrol and Immigration and Naturalization Service Agents. A border fence was planned for San Diego and severe repercussions were increased for persons entering the country illegally. With hopes of easing worksite enforcement, an automated employment verification pilot program was created. IIRIRA also allowed state police officers to enforce immigration law using the 287(g) program. The increased enforcement by IIRIRA did not bear much f ...
Illegal Immigration Essays
Illegal Immigration Essays
Illegal Immigration Essay
Illegal Immigration Essay
Illegal Immigration Essay
Illegal Immigration Essay
Immigrants Too Much Essay
Pros and Cons of Immigration Essay
Similar to Arizona senate bill (20)
Surname 1Surname 8Student’s NameCourse Name25 February.docx
Surname 1Surname 8Student’s NameCourse Name25 February.docx
Two Sides of the Same Coin - the Connection Between Legal and Illegal Immigra...
Two Sides of the Same Coin - the Connection Between Legal and Illegal Immigra...
IntroductionThis paper will analyze the author’s claims, reasons.docx
IntroductionThis paper will analyze the author’s claims, reasons.docx
Running head EMERGING ISSUES HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE1EMERGING.docx
Running head EMERGING ISSUES HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE1EMERGING.docx
Arizona senate bill
- 9. Bibliography Archibold, Randal C. "Arizona Enacts Stringent Law on Immigration." The New York Times . The New York Times, 23 Apr. 2010. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html>. Sullivan, Laura. "Prison Economics Help Drive Ariz. Immigration Law." npr . npr, 28 Oct. 2010. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/ story.php?storyId=130833741>. Wallace, David. "A carefully crafted immigration law in Arizona." washingtonexaminer.com . N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/ carefully-crafted-immigration-law-arizona>. "What does Arizona's immigration law do?" CNN.com . CNN, 23 Apr. 2010. Web. 5 Apr. 2011. <http://articles.cnn.com/2010-04-23/politics/ immigration.faq_1_arizona-immigration-law-reform-sb1070?_s=PM:POLITICS>.