Analysys of the survey about tolerance

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

0 likes•294 views

The document appears to contain results from several surveys or polls on topics related to diversity, inclusion, and acceptance of different groups. Each section lists percentages corresponding to responses on a 5-point agreement scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) or yes/no options on various statements. The statements probe attitudes toward accepting people from different backgrounds, views on a tolerant vs intolerant society, experiences of discrimination, and opinions on interacting with foreigners and immigrants.

Education

44%
34%
12%
8% 2%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

0.58% 1.16%
9%
39%
49%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

1%
8%
7%
58%
26%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

17%
26%
20%
17%
20%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

9%
13%
44%
29%
5%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

5%
15%
19%
26%
35%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

28%
32%
13%
15%
11%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

5%
32%
25%
25%
13%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

4%
12%
40%
20%
24%
I strongly agree
I agree
neutral
I disagree
I strongly disagree

2%
89%
9%
accepting people like us
accepting people the way they are
accepting certain traits of character among
people

15%
13%
33%
39%
too tolerant society
a very tolerant society
a tolerant society
intolerant society

20%
57%
57%
30%
28%
71%
9%
3%
ethnic origin
language
religion
culture
social status
education level
age
other

82%
85%
26%
55%
27%
2%
in school
among family
on a street
in sports
in church
other

6%
12%
0%
19%
31%
32%
0.58%
Yes, because I can't understand them and they
should speak my language in my country.
Yes, because I can't communicate with them if
there is a conflict situation.
Yes, because I don't like foreigners.
No, because I'm happy that they wanted to visit
my country.
No, because everybody should speak with any
language they want, when they want.
No, because I believe that every country should
be friendly towards foreigners.
It's hard to say.

32%
19%
23%
0%
26%
Yes, because he might have new, fresh ideas.
Yes, because he might have other experiences.
No, because he might not know my country.
No, because he might not get accepted by the
residents.
It's hard to say.

67%
17%
8%
6% 2%
Yes
Rather yes
No
Rather no
It's hard to say.

67%
20%
6%
3% 4%
Yes
Rather yes
No
Rather not
It's hard to say

Recently uploaded

PIMS Job Advertisement 2024.pdf Islamabad

AyyanKhan40

MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...

NelTorrente

Top five deadliest dog breeds in America

Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys

clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf

Priyankaranawat4

Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit

chanes7

Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and Training

AG2 Design

Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications. For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/

MASS MEDIA STUDIES-835-CLASS XI Resource Material.pdf

goswamiyash170123

Assignment_4_ArianaBusciglio Marvel(1).docx

ArianaBusciglio

Reflective and Evaluative Practice...pdf

amberjdewit93

Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx

Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia

RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3

IreneSebastianRueco1

June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...

Levi Shapiro

Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg, The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation. This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability. Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots. The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee. • The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act. • The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X. • The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202

Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling

Excellence Foundation for South Sudan

Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA

deeptiverma2406

Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification. for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.

The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx

heathfieldcps1

Fresher’s Quiz 2023 at GMC Nizamabad.pptx

SriSurya50

DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share

taiba qazi

A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education

Peter Windle

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction. This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.

Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt

EverAndrsGuerraGuerr

Recently uploaded (20)

PIMS Job Advertisement 2024.pdf Islamabad

MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...

Top five deadliest dog breeds in America

clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf

Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit

Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and Training

MASS MEDIA STUDIES-835-CLASS XI Resource Material.pdf

Assignment_4_ArianaBusciglio Marvel(1).docx

Reflective and Evaluative Practice...pdf

Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx

RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3

June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...

Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling

Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA

The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx

Fresher’s Quiz 2023 at GMC Nizamabad.pptx

DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share

A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education

Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...

Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt

Analysys of the survey about tolerance

3. 44% 34% 12% 8% 2% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

4. 44% 34% 12% 8% 2% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

5. 0.58% 1.16% 9% 39% 49% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

6. 1% 8% 7% 58% 26% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

7. 17% 26% 20% 17% 20% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

8. 9% 13% 44% 29% 5% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

9. 5% 15% 19% 26% 35% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

10. 28% 32% 13% 15% 11% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

11. 5% 32% 25% 25% 13% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

12. 4% 12% 40% 20% 24% I strongly agree I agree neutral I disagree I strongly disagree

13.

14. 2% 89% 9% accepting people like us accepting people the way they are accepting certain traits of character among people

15. 15% 13% 33% 39% too tolerant society a very tolerant society a tolerant society intolerant society

16. 23% 60% 17% yes sometimes no

17. 91% 9% yes no

18. 20% 57% 57% 30% 28% 71% 9% 3% ethnic origin language religion culture social status education level age other

19. 82% 85% 26% 55% 27% 2% in school among family on a street in sports in church other

20. 21% 79% yes no

21. 6% 12% 0% 19% 31% 32% 0.58% Yes, because I can't understand them and they should speak my language in my country. Yes, because I can't communicate with them if there is a conflict situation. Yes, because I don't like foreigners. No, because I'm happy that they wanted to visit my country. No, because everybody should speak with any language they want, when they want. No, because I believe that every country should be friendly towards foreigners. It's hard to say.

22. 32% 19% 23% 0% 26% Yes, because he might have new, fresh ideas. Yes, because he might have other experiences. No, because he might not know my country. No, because he might not get accepted by the residents. It's hard to say.

23. 67% 17% 8% 6% 2% Yes Rather yes No Rather no It's hard to say.

24. 67% 20% 6% 3% 4% Yes Rather yes No Rather not It's hard to say

Analysys of the survey about tolerance

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Project Etwinning

More from Project Etwinning (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Analysys of the survey about tolerance