Ishii, Y., Sawaki, Y., & Tahara, T. (2017). An analysis of Japanese EFL learners’ reading-to-write task completion process: Triangulation of stimulated recall and keystroke logging data sources. The 21st Annual Conference of the Japan Language Testing Association. University of Aizu.
Validation of the grammatical carefulness scale using a discourse completion ...Yu Tamura
Tamura, Y., & Kusanagi, K. (2014). Validation of the grammatical carefulness scale using a discourse completion task and a reading and underlining task. The 84th LET Chubu Confernce. Shizuoka University, Japan.
English language learners: This is a seven-slide presentation with a few steps and an example to help you revisit information on sequence/process paragraph structure, so you can apply the information in our Module III tasks (RZP - March 2020).
Joint construction Donnarumma & Shrestha 2011, EATAW conference, IrelandPrithvi Shrestha
It is a presentation that I gave at the European Association for Teaching Academic Writing (EATAW) at the University of Limerick, Ireland (29 June - 1 Jult 2011).
Designing a course outline especially with reference to English for Specific Purposes. These slides provides all necessary details and cover major points of topics.
Validation of the grammatical carefulness scale using a discourse completion ...Yu Tamura
Tamura, Y., & Kusanagi, K. (2014). Validation of the grammatical carefulness scale using a discourse completion task and a reading and underlining task. The 84th LET Chubu Confernce. Shizuoka University, Japan.
English language learners: This is a seven-slide presentation with a few steps and an example to help you revisit information on sequence/process paragraph structure, so you can apply the information in our Module III tasks (RZP - March 2020).
Joint construction Donnarumma & Shrestha 2011, EATAW conference, IrelandPrithvi Shrestha
It is a presentation that I gave at the European Association for Teaching Academic Writing (EATAW) at the University of Limerick, Ireland (29 June - 1 Jult 2011).
Designing a course outline especially with reference to English for Specific Purposes. These slides provides all necessary details and cover major points of topics.
L2 Writing Development of Japanese EFL Students at a Writing Center KateConference
The present study investigated the second language (L2) writing development of three Japanese undergraduate students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) who have repeatedly utilized a university writing center. The student pre-compositions (the text written before attending the writing center) and the post-compositions (the text written after attending the writing center for a year) were compared for fluency, syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, and writing quality. In this study, Words/T (number of words per T-unit) was used to measure fluency, S-nodes/T (number of S-nodes per T-unit) was employed to capture syntactic complexity, and the Guiraud Index was used to determine lexical diversity. Regarding analytic rating, two evaluators with English teaching background evaluated the pre- and the post-compositions without knowing which were written before or after a year of lessons at the writing center, according to an adapted version of English as a Second Language (ESL) Composition Profile. Ten points were assigned for each of the five criteria: content, organization, language, vocabulary, and mechanics. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the students to obtain supplementary data for interpreting the primary data. The results revealed that the students' L2 writing development varied among individuals. Student A showed improvement in syntactic complexity, but deterioration in fluency and lexical diversity. Student B exhibited increased fluency and syntactic complexity but decreased lexical diversity. Meanwhile, Student C developed fluency and lexical diversity, but not syntactic complexity. The present findings also indicated that individual factors could affect the variation of changes in their L2 writing. Based on the analytic ratings, all three students showed improved post-composition scores. Through the interviews with the students, it was found that the students experienced great improvement in “organization," further indicating that the repeated use of a writing center can foster a positive attitude toward L2 writing.
*Book 1 focuses on sentences. It teaches students to write sentences within the context of a paragraph and paragraph structure.
*Book 2 focuses on simple paragraphs. It teaches students to write a paragraph with the help of an outline.
*Book 3 focuses on advanced paragraphs. It teaches students to write topic sentences, concluding sentences, and more advanced writing.
The reader: defining the construct of reading ability.Zaina Dali
The reader: defining the construct of reading ability.
Assessing Reading. (2000). J. Charles Alderson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter four
Kamishibai: a collaborative project for young learners of Englishmickstout
This is the powerpoint used in a workshop given at San Lorenzo Ruiz Academy in Calapan, Philippines as part of the Teachers Helping Teachers (THT) seminars in February 2009.
Case study "Thesis Writing" Developing Courses in Englsih By Helen BasturkmenOla Sayed Ahmed
A case study of teacher designing a workshop series about Thesis Writing. this case study was in chapter 2 of Helen Basturkmen's book Developing Courses in English
A Mixed-Methods Investigation into Japanese EFL Learners’ Online Revision Act...Yutaka Ishii
Ishii, Y., & Sawaki, Y. (2018). A Mixed-Methods Investigation into Japanese EFL Learners’ Online Revision Activities during the Reading-into-Writing Task Completion Process. The 17th Symposium on Second Language Writing. Simon Fraser University.
Similar to An analysis of Japanese EFL learners’ reading-to-write task completion process: Triangulation of stimulated recall and keystroke logging data sources.
L2 Writing Development of Japanese EFL Students at a Writing Center KateConference
The present study investigated the second language (L2) writing development of three Japanese undergraduate students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) who have repeatedly utilized a university writing center. The student pre-compositions (the text written before attending the writing center) and the post-compositions (the text written after attending the writing center for a year) were compared for fluency, syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, and writing quality. In this study, Words/T (number of words per T-unit) was used to measure fluency, S-nodes/T (number of S-nodes per T-unit) was employed to capture syntactic complexity, and the Guiraud Index was used to determine lexical diversity. Regarding analytic rating, two evaluators with English teaching background evaluated the pre- and the post-compositions without knowing which were written before or after a year of lessons at the writing center, according to an adapted version of English as a Second Language (ESL) Composition Profile. Ten points were assigned for each of the five criteria: content, organization, language, vocabulary, and mechanics. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the students to obtain supplementary data for interpreting the primary data. The results revealed that the students' L2 writing development varied among individuals. Student A showed improvement in syntactic complexity, but deterioration in fluency and lexical diversity. Student B exhibited increased fluency and syntactic complexity but decreased lexical diversity. Meanwhile, Student C developed fluency and lexical diversity, but not syntactic complexity. The present findings also indicated that individual factors could affect the variation of changes in their L2 writing. Based on the analytic ratings, all three students showed improved post-composition scores. Through the interviews with the students, it was found that the students experienced great improvement in “organization," further indicating that the repeated use of a writing center can foster a positive attitude toward L2 writing.
*Book 1 focuses on sentences. It teaches students to write sentences within the context of a paragraph and paragraph structure.
*Book 2 focuses on simple paragraphs. It teaches students to write a paragraph with the help of an outline.
*Book 3 focuses on advanced paragraphs. It teaches students to write topic sentences, concluding sentences, and more advanced writing.
The reader: defining the construct of reading ability.Zaina Dali
The reader: defining the construct of reading ability.
Assessing Reading. (2000). J. Charles Alderson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter four
Kamishibai: a collaborative project for young learners of Englishmickstout
This is the powerpoint used in a workshop given at San Lorenzo Ruiz Academy in Calapan, Philippines as part of the Teachers Helping Teachers (THT) seminars in February 2009.
Case study "Thesis Writing" Developing Courses in Englsih By Helen BasturkmenOla Sayed Ahmed
A case study of teacher designing a workshop series about Thesis Writing. this case study was in chapter 2 of Helen Basturkmen's book Developing Courses in English
Similar to An analysis of Japanese EFL learners’ reading-to-write task completion process: Triangulation of stimulated recall and keystroke logging data sources. (20)
A Mixed-Methods Investigation into Japanese EFL Learners’ Online Revision Act...Yutaka Ishii
Ishii, Y., & Sawaki, Y. (2018). A Mixed-Methods Investigation into Japanese EFL Learners’ Online Revision Activities during the Reading-into-Writing Task Completion Process. The 17th Symposium on Second Language Writing. Simon Fraser University.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
An analysis of Japanese EFL learners’ reading-to-write task completion process: Triangulation of stimulated recall and keystroke logging data sources.
1. An analysis of Japanese EFL learners’ reading-
to-write task completion process:
Triangulation of stimulated recall and
keystroke logging data sources
Yutaka Ishii, Yasuyo Sawaki, & Tatsuro Tahara
Waseda University
yutakaishii@aoni.waseda.jp
The 21st Annual Conference of the Japan Language Testing Association
University of Aizu
1
3. Introduction
• Reading-to-write tasks (e.g., summarization) are
important task types in conducting academic work
in English (Rosenfeld, Leung & Oltman, 2001).
• In this Kaken project we examine characteristics of
Japanese university students’ performance on
summarization tasks and develop materials for
teaching summarization in academic writing
courses.
• This presentation focuses on the process learners
engage while completing a summary task
• Stimulated recall and keystroke logging are combined for
a fine-grained analysis of learners’ writing process from
multiple perspectives.
3
4. Previous Studies on L2 writing
task completion process
• Process features (Baaijen, Galbraith, & de Glopper,
2012; Barkaoui, 2016; Zhang, & Deane, 2015)
• Relationship between English language proficiency
and keyboarding skills (Barkaoui, 2015)
• Stimulated recall (Lindgren, & Sullivan, 2003)
• Time allocation of composing time (De Larios,
Manchon, & Murphy, 2006)
• Integrated writing task process (Barkaoui, 2015;
Chan, 2017)
4
5. Research Question
• What task completion process do EFL learners in
Japan engage to respond to a summary task?
Specific foci:
• Reading the source text
• Writing the response
• Reading-writing integration
5
6. Method (1)
• Participants
• Five undergraduate students majoring in English
language and literature at a private university in Tokyo
• All participants enrolled in a required academic writing
course for second-year students
• Materials
• Two summarization tasks (each based on a single source
text in English)
• Source texts were adopted from published Eiken test
forms for Grade Pre-1 (Eiken Foundation of Japan)
6
7. Method (2): Source texts
A. The War over
Antiquities
(3rd admin. 2014)
B. The Automated
Future
(1st admin. 2014)
Structure Argumentative
Length (words) 508 504
paragraphs/
sentences
4/23 4/24
Vocabulary
Level
6000 5000
Readability
(F-K Grade Level)
12.4 12.4
Summary length Approx. 80 words
7
8. Method (3)
• Procedure
• Each learner summarized one text in English (Approx. 80
words).
• Random assignment of participants to texts
• 40-minutes per task; dictionary use allowed
• The learner’s task completion process videotaped
• Keystroke logged via Writing MaetriX
• An observation sheet comprising six categories (Read text,
Annotate, Plan, Write, Review, & Revise) completed by observers
• Upon completion of the summary task, a stimulated recall
session was conducted in Japanese.
• Prompts:
• Video of the task completion process
• Replay of Keystroke logging data
• Completed summary response
• Test booklet with the participant’s notes (annotations and
outlines)
8
9. Method (4)
Video recording
Two observers took notes on
the observation sheet.
9
Test-taker
Online dictionary (Weblio)
Recording of keystroke logging
10. Method (5)
• Scoring
• Double scoring on all rating scales by two trained raters
• Rating scales
• Integration (1-4 scale): The degree of succinct representation
of source-text content by employing appropriate Macrorules
(e.g., Brown & Day, 1983; van Dijk & Kintsch, 1983) for
integrating information across text (based on Sawaki, 2003;
Hijikata-Someya, Ono & Yamanishi, 2015)
• Language (1-4 scale): The degree of grammatical control,
syntactic variety, and appropriate word choice (adapted from
Hijikata-Someya et al., 2015)
10
11. Method (6)
Scoring results summary
Student Text
Total
Number of
words
Integration
(1-4)
Language
(1-4)
String match
(3+ words)
1 A 84 2.5 2.0 4
2 B 75 2.5 3.0 0
3 B 80 3.5 3.0 0
4 B 75 2.5 2.0 1
5 A 94 2.0 2.0 0
11
12. Method (7)
• WritingMaetriX (Kusanagi, Abe, Fukuta, &
Kawaguchi, 2014)
• A keystroke-logging program that can record, analyze,
and replay learners’ writing process
12
13. Results: Overview
• Time required for task completion: approx. 32– 40 min.
• Task completion time divided into two phases for qualitative
analyses:
• Phase 1: Reading (text reading, annotating, and planning)
• Phase 2: Writing (writing, revising, and reviewing)
Task completion process
Phase 1
Phase 2
(6-22 min.)
(18-33 min.)
13
14. Phase 1: Annotations
• Students used various kinds of annotations while
reading the source text.
• Underline: I underlined when I found a concrete example
(S5: 14)
• Mark: I have a habit of writing a reverse triangle when
looking at "however" (S4: 48)
• parenthesis: I just wrote a parenthesis to highlight the
that-clause following “argue" (S1; 9)
• Others (slash, notes on blank spaces, etc...)
See next slide for examples
14
15. Phase 1: Planning
• Students had different styles of planning
• Student 1, 2, 3: developed the structure of
summary only in their minds (without writing)
• Student 4, 5: took notes on question paper
• I thought about the structure while looking at the
(question) paper first, before I started writing. (S5:
29)
• This is an introduction, and I picked out and took
notes of the skeleton only, so that I could use them
(for summary) (S4: 80)
15
16. Phase 2: Descriptive Statistics of learners’
keystroke logging
Student1 student2 Student3 student4 Student5
Task A B B B A
First data
input (sec)
447.0 632.2 721.0 1390.6 893.9
Key input
(minute)
28.4 42.0 50.1 34.5 77.3
# Words
(minute)
3.72 2.30 2.35 1.90 2.65
Revision
(minute)
0.97 1.78 2.61 2.43 4.28
revision 0/7/22 0/24/53 0/45/89 0/16/96 0/79/151
16
17. Phase 2: Time Series Data of Learners'
Writing Process
Revision
First data input
Planning
17
18. Phase 2: Verbal protocol data
• First data input
• First of all, I wrote industrial, industrial revolution in the
introduction session. (S4: 160)
• Planning
• After I finished writing about the second paragraph, I
was about to write the third paragraph. Then, I was
thinking about how to summarize this paragraph. (S5:
76)
• Revision
• From here, I tried to reduce the word such as UNESCO.
(S5: 123)
18
19. Phase 2: Planning and revision
processes
• Planning
• Comprehensive & local planning depending on the situation
(similar to independent writing)
• Re-reading and paraphrasing the source text
• Revision
• Two types of revisions: precontextual and contextual (similar
to independent writing).
• Another precontextual revision “paraphrase” was frequently
observed compared to independent writing task.
• Planning & revision: Focus on reducing the number of
words frequently reported (meeting the length limit =
unique to source-based writing tasks)
19
20. Phase 2: Planning example
Stimulated Recall
• I may be thinking about
the paraphrase of “ship”
in this pause. I used the
word “transfer” to report
that the antiques finally
moved to UK. However,
because the meaning
was temporailiy obscure,
I used weblio at this time.
(S1: 49)
Keystroke Logging
• In recent years, illegally
imported antiques have
been returned to their
hometown. This is largly
due to the treaty by
UNESCO, but it is not
perfect. One well-known
example is the Elgin
Marbles, a heritage of the
Palthanon in Athens, Greek.
It is originally owned by
Greece, but it was
transfered to Britain for
preservation*
20
21. Phase 2: Revision processes
Stimulated Recall
• I noticed the number of
characters is not
enough and had to
summarize the content.
So, I was worried about
how to edit the content.
(S4: 187)
Keystroke Logging
• Industrial Revolution
increased the productivity
of that age while it also
made difficulties to the
labors, which thier working
was replaced by machine.
However, in this age,
information-technology
brings new reformation to
the way of people. Hanson
claims that (considers this
reformation possitively,)
21
22. Phase 2: Reading-writing integration
• Writerly reading (Hirvela, 2004): reading with
consciousness of writing summary
• I underlined a concrete example that I thought was easy
to use (for summary) (S3: 39)
• I found this the most critical in the paragraph, and this
explanation continued, so I thought I need to write it (in
my summary) and underlined that part (S5: 17)
The parts mentioned above were actually reflected in
these students’ summaries.
22
23. Phase 2: Reading-writing integration
• Mining: (Hirvela, 2004; Plakans, 2009): detecting
information for text while writing
• e.g.) Considering paraphrase, Adding/deleting examples
in summary, Comparing text with summary
• I underlined the abstract points while reading, (...) While
writing a summary, I found it bothersome to look for
(these points), I underlined them so that I could go back
to the points I used for summary (S3: 144).
• I checked if my summary made sense and if there were
no points I overlooked (S2: 91)
23
24. Discussion and Conclusion
• Annotation and planning behavior while reading differs as well as how
to use the information highlighted in their summaries
• The result suggests an important role of reading in integrated tasks, shown as
previous studies (e.g. Plakans & Gebril, 2012; Sawaki , Quinlan, & Lee, 2013).
• (The most important skill is) reading. Without deep understanding, I could not
write or organize (my summary). (S3:197)
• Some revision behaviors observed while completing independent tasks
were also observed in this study, while other unique ones were also
identified.
• Revision behavior differs between ESL and EFL learners
• Barkaoui (2016) stated that learners revised their writing most frequently in the
middle segment of their writing process, while completing an integrated writing
task.
• In contrast, learners in this study revised their writing in the final segment.
• Limitations of this study
• Small sample size
• Stimulated recall
24
25. References (1/2)
• Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke analysis: Reflections on procedures and
measures. Written Communication, 29(3), 246-277.
• Barkaoui, K. (2016). What and When Second‐Language Learners Revise When Responding to Timed
Writing Tasks on the Computer: The Roles of Task Type, Second Language Proficiency, and Keyboarding
Skills. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 320-340.
• Barkaoui, K. (2015). Test Takers' Writing Activities During the TOEFL iBT® Writing Tasks: A Stimulated
Recall Study. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(1), 1-42.
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 1-14.
• Chan, S. (2017). Using keystroke logging to understand writers’ processes on a reading-into-writing test.
Language Testing in Asia, 7(10), 1-23.
• De Larios, J. R., Manchon, R. M., & Murphy, L. (2006). Generating text in native and foreign language
writing: A temporal analysis of problemsolving formulation processes. The Modern Language Journal,
90(1), 100-114.
• Hijikata-Someya, Y., Ono, M., & Yamanishi, H. (2015). Evaluation y native and non-native English
teacher-raters of Japanese students’ summaries. English Language Teaching, 8(7), 1-12.
• Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. Ann Arbor,
MI: The University of Michigan Press.
• Kusanagi, K., Abe, D, Fukuta, J, & Kawaguchi, Y. (2013). Visualizing writing process using a key-logging
system: For construct feedback to enhance autonomous learning. Paper presented at the 81st Spring
Conference of the Chubu Chapter, Japan Association for Language Education and Technology (LET),
Tokai Gakuen University, Japan.
25
26. References (2/2)
• Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and language
awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awareness,
12(3-4), 172-186.
• Plakans, L. (2015). Integrated Second Language Writing Assessment: Why? What? How?. Language and
Linguistics Compass, 9(4), 159-167.
• Plakans, L. (2009). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks, Journal of English for
Academic Purposes, 8(4), 252-266.
• Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language
writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 18-34.
• Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oltman, P. K. (2001). The reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks
important for academic success at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Educational Testing Service.
• Sawaki, Y., Quinlan, T., & Lee, Y. W. (2013). Understanding learner strengths and weaknesses: Assessing
performance on an integrated writing task. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 73-95.
• Sawaki, Y. (2003). A comparison of summarization and free recall as reading comprehension tasks in
web-based assessment of Japanese as a foreign language (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of
California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
• Zhang, M., & Deane, P. (2015). Process features in writing: Internal structure and incremental value
over product features. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2), 1-12.
• Obunsha (Ed.) (2016). 2016 nendo eiken jun-1 kyu kako 6 kai zenmondaishuu (Test papers for the last six
administrations of the Eiken Grade Pre-1 test, 2016). Tokyo: Obunsha.
26