Supplemental information published for AEP’s quarterly earnings conference call with financial analysts on Jan. 28, 2011.
For more information, log on to AEP.com/Investors
This document is from a presentation by Michael D. Fraizer, Chairman and CEO of Genworth Financial, at the UBS Global Financial Services Conference on May 14, 2008. The presentation discusses Genworth's strategy of providing financial security products across different life stages. It acknowledges challenges in the US mortgage insurance market in 2008 due to the difficult environment, but expresses confidence in Genworth's positioning for improved future performance. The presentation outlines priorities for 2008, including navigating challenges in US mortgage insurance, expanding wealth management and retirement offerings, growing internationally, and transitioning life and long term care business lines.
The document discusses Joseph Rigby's presentation on the strategic positioning of Southeast Utilities. It summarizes the company's strategic focus on power delivery, Conectiv Energy, and Pepco Energy Services. It also outlines the goals for the power delivery business, including sales growth, infrastructure investment, operational excellence, and constructive regulatory outcomes to deliver average annual earnings growth of at least 4%. Key infrastructure projects are highlighted.
This document provides an overview of Ameren Corporation's investor meetings in March 2008. It discusses Ameren's financial outlook, including targets of 4-6% average EPS growth from 2007-2010 driven primarily by regulated business growth. It outlines Ameren's regulated and non-regulated generation businesses and investment plans to increase rate base and regulated returns. The presentation also reviews Illinois and Missouri rate case filings and the company's hedging strategies for its non-regulated generation business.
Pepco Holdings, Inc. held an analyst conference on October 5-6, 2004 to discuss the company's performance. The presentation included an overview of PHI's businesses, strategy, and corporate governance practices. It noted PHI has $7.1 billion in revenues and focuses on its regulated electric and gas delivery business, which accounts for 72% of operating income. The Power Delivery segment was discussed, which includes the transmission and distribution of electricity to 1.8 million customers across several mid-Atlantic states.
public serviceenterprise group european_tripfinance20
1) Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) is holding a European marketing trip from February 25-29, 2008 to promote its business.
2) PSEG provides forward-looking statements about its performance, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ.
3) PSEG presents non-GAAP operating earnings in addition to GAAP net income to exclude certain one-time items in order to provide a consistent performance measure.
The document provides an overview of AES Corporation's 2005 financial results and outlook for 2006. Some key points:
- 2005 was a record year for revenues, net cash from operating activities, and free cash flow. Revenues exceeded $11 billion.
- Fourth quarter and full-year 2005 earnings benefited from good operating results, favorable currencies, and a lower tax rate.
- 2008 financial targets are reaffirmed, including $1.03-$1.34 diluted EPS and $2.6-$2.9 billion in net cash from operating activities.
- 2006 guidance is consistent with 2008 targets and forecasts 4-5% revenue growth, $0.90 diluted EPS, and $0.95
Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) operates power generation, transmission and distribution businesses. The document discusses opportunities for growth across PSEG's businesses in areas like renewable energy, carbon reduction initiatives, and New Jersey's Energy Master Plan. PSEG is well positioned for growth through its diverse portfolio of assets and investments aligned with trends in tightening capacity, environmental compliance, and energy policy debates. PSE&G in particular is positioned for steady growth through its base investment plan and additional opportunities in transmission expansion, renewable strategies, and advanced metering infrastructure.
The document provides an overview of AES Corporation's third quarter 2007 financial results. Some key points:
- Revenues increased 18% year-over-year to $3.5 billion while gross margin increased 2% to $840 million. Adjusted EPS was $0.18 compared to $0.30 in the prior year.
- Segment results were mixed - Latin America generation saw declines due to gas curtailments in Chile/Argentina while utilities saw gains from currency effects. North America generation saw improvements from higher prices.
- Cash flow was impacted by the sale of EDC in May 2007. Excluding EDC, cash flows would have been higher year-over-year.
-
This document is from a presentation by Michael D. Fraizer, Chairman and CEO of Genworth Financial, at the UBS Global Financial Services Conference on May 14, 2008. The presentation discusses Genworth's strategy of providing financial security products across different life stages. It acknowledges challenges in the US mortgage insurance market in 2008 due to the difficult environment, but expresses confidence in Genworth's positioning for improved future performance. The presentation outlines priorities for 2008, including navigating challenges in US mortgage insurance, expanding wealth management and retirement offerings, growing internationally, and transitioning life and long term care business lines.
The document discusses Joseph Rigby's presentation on the strategic positioning of Southeast Utilities. It summarizes the company's strategic focus on power delivery, Conectiv Energy, and Pepco Energy Services. It also outlines the goals for the power delivery business, including sales growth, infrastructure investment, operational excellence, and constructive regulatory outcomes to deliver average annual earnings growth of at least 4%. Key infrastructure projects are highlighted.
This document provides an overview of Ameren Corporation's investor meetings in March 2008. It discusses Ameren's financial outlook, including targets of 4-6% average EPS growth from 2007-2010 driven primarily by regulated business growth. It outlines Ameren's regulated and non-regulated generation businesses and investment plans to increase rate base and regulated returns. The presentation also reviews Illinois and Missouri rate case filings and the company's hedging strategies for its non-regulated generation business.
Pepco Holdings, Inc. held an analyst conference on October 5-6, 2004 to discuss the company's performance. The presentation included an overview of PHI's businesses, strategy, and corporate governance practices. It noted PHI has $7.1 billion in revenues and focuses on its regulated electric and gas delivery business, which accounts for 72% of operating income. The Power Delivery segment was discussed, which includes the transmission and distribution of electricity to 1.8 million customers across several mid-Atlantic states.
public serviceenterprise group european_tripfinance20
1) Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) is holding a European marketing trip from February 25-29, 2008 to promote its business.
2) PSEG provides forward-looking statements about its performance, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ.
3) PSEG presents non-GAAP operating earnings in addition to GAAP net income to exclude certain one-time items in order to provide a consistent performance measure.
The document provides an overview of AES Corporation's 2005 financial results and outlook for 2006. Some key points:
- 2005 was a record year for revenues, net cash from operating activities, and free cash flow. Revenues exceeded $11 billion.
- Fourth quarter and full-year 2005 earnings benefited from good operating results, favorable currencies, and a lower tax rate.
- 2008 financial targets are reaffirmed, including $1.03-$1.34 diluted EPS and $2.6-$2.9 billion in net cash from operating activities.
- 2006 guidance is consistent with 2008 targets and forecasts 4-5% revenue growth, $0.90 diluted EPS, and $0.95
Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) operates power generation, transmission and distribution businesses. The document discusses opportunities for growth across PSEG's businesses in areas like renewable energy, carbon reduction initiatives, and New Jersey's Energy Master Plan. PSEG is well positioned for growth through its diverse portfolio of assets and investments aligned with trends in tightening capacity, environmental compliance, and energy policy debates. PSE&G in particular is positioned for steady growth through its base investment plan and additional opportunities in transmission expansion, renewable strategies, and advanced metering infrastructure.
The document provides an overview of AES Corporation's third quarter 2007 financial results. Some key points:
- Revenues increased 18% year-over-year to $3.5 billion while gross margin increased 2% to $840 million. Adjusted EPS was $0.18 compared to $0.30 in the prior year.
- Segment results were mixed - Latin America generation saw declines due to gas curtailments in Chile/Argentina while utilities saw gains from currency effects. North America generation saw improvements from higher prices.
- Cash flow was impacted by the sale of EDC in May 2007. Excluding EDC, cash flows would have been higher year-over-year.
-
Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) held a financial conference to discuss its performance and outlook. PSEG operates power generation, transmission and distribution businesses. It provided guidance for 2007 operating earnings of $1.305-1.41 billion and EPS of $5.15-5.45. PSEG aims to achieve growth through operational excellence, financial strength, and disciplined investment. It is positioned to benefit from opportunities related to climate change initiatives, capacity needs, and infrastructure investment.
El Paso Electric provides electricity to customers in west Texas and southern New Mexico. It owns power generation facilities with a total capacity of 1,785 MW, primarily fueled by nuclear, natural gas, and coal. The company is experiencing above average customer and sales growth due to economic expansion in its service territory. El Paso Electric has a sizable capital expenditure plan over the next several years to build new infrastructure to meet increasing demand. It maintains good financial stability and credit ratings to support its investments.
The 2005 annual report summarizes Constellation Energy's strong financial performance and strategic moves that positioned it for continued success. Record earnings per share of $3.62 in 2005 represented 16% growth over 2004. Total revenues reached $17.1 billion. The company also announced a merger with FPL Group that would make it the largest competitive energy supplier and second-largest utility in the US, positioning it as an "end-game player" in industry consolidation. Chairman Mayo Shattuck expressed confidence that the company's balanced business strategy would continue delivering superior returns for shareholders in the future.
NiSource Inc. is a utility company focused on natural gas and electric utilities. It has over 3 million customers across 9 states. In 2002, NiSource focused on strengthening its balance sheet by reducing debt, streamlining operations, and shedding non-core assets. It raised $735 million through an equity offering, using the funds to further pay down debt. NiSource maintained investment-grade credit ratings while improving transparency and adhering to new governance standards. It focused on efficiently operating its regulated gas and electric utilities to serve customers in a high-demand region from Indiana to New England.
The document provides the first quarter 2009 results and outlook for CMS Energy. It includes the following key points:
- First quarter results were on plan and full year guidance remains unchanged. The common dividend was increased.
- Regulatory filings for renewable energy, energy optimization, and gas rate cases were discussed, which support a balance of customer and investor interests.
- Financial results and sensitivities for 2009 were presented, including adjusted EPS guidance of $1.25, sales and unemployment outlook, and impacts of potential factors like an auto industry bankruptcy.
- The appendix includes a GAAP reconciliation of reported versus adjusted earnings and tax benefit information.
Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2012 Investor Day Presentationgenworth_financial
The document provides an overview of Genworth MI Canada's Investor Day presentation on delivering value beyond mortgage insurance, outlining their market and strategy, sales approach, operations capabilities, and focus on providing a customer centric experience through collaboration with lenders. Genworth MI Canada aims to be a strategic growth partner for lenders by addressing their balance sheet needs, driving top line growth, and leveraging local expertise to outpace the competition.
fpl group library.corporate-library. corporate-finance17
FPL Group reported record adjusted earnings per share for 2008, driven by strong performance at NextEra Energy Resources. NextEra Energy Resources had a record year and added approximately 1,300 MW of wind capacity. FPL's earnings were challenged by a weak Florida economy and flat customer growth. FPL will seek a new rate agreement in 2009 to support investments in cleaner generation. NextEra Energy Resources continues to perform well due to contributions from new and existing projects. FPL Group expects adjusted EPS of $4.05 to $4.25 for 2009.
public serviceenterprise group media.corporatefinance20
PSEG reported 2008 income from continuing operations of $983 million, or $1.93 per share, compared to $1,325 million, or $2.60 per share in 2007. Operating earnings for 2008 were $1,487 million, or $2.92 per share compared to $1,385 million, or $2.72 per share in 2007. PSEG Power had record operating earnings of $1,050 million in 2008 and PSEG expects 2009 operating earnings to be between $1,520-1,650 million, or $3.00-$3.25 per share. PSE&G operating earnings are expected to decline in 2009 due to higher pension and technology expenses.
Iochpe-Maxion S.A reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2007. Net revenue increased 23.9% in 4Q07 and 3.3% for the full year. EBITDA grew 47.8% in 4Q07 and 1.1% for the full year. Net income increased 1,129.0% in 4Q07 and 25.1% for the full year. The results were driven by growth in the Brazilian vehicle and agricultural machinery industries as well as recovery in domestic demand for railway freight cars. Foreign exchange impacts from currency appreciation reduced revenues compared to prior periods.
The document provides reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures reported by The Pepsi Bottling Group for 2008. It identifies items affecting comparability between years, including restructuring charges, asset disposal charges, and stock-based compensation. The document summarizes the quantitative impact of these items on key financial metrics like operating income growth, earnings per share, and cash flow. It also provides guidance for 2008 operating free cash flow.
The Business Factors Index is unique within the alternative finance sector. It tracks small business turnover since July 2007 and the trends derived from this data have been collated with the results of a series of interviews conducted with more than 300 business owners across a range of sectors.
The document summarizes a presentation given by Joseph M. Rigby, CFO of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI) at an investor conference on March 28, 2006. The presentation outlines PHI's strategy to remain a regional diversified energy delivery and competitive services company focused on operational excellence. It discusses PHI's power delivery business, Conectiv Energy, and Pepco Energy Services. The presentation also provides financial performance summaries and projections showing PHI's ability to cover dividends and capital expenditures with cash from operations.
The 2006 annual report summarizes Duke Energy's accomplishments in merging with Cinergy, reducing risk through asset sales, and establishing goals for 2007 focused on establishing a unified culture and identity, optimizing operations, and achieving balanced public policy outcomes while delivering earnings and dividend growth.
This document summarizes Level 3's safe harbor statement regarding forward-looking statements. It notes that some statements made in company presentations are forward-looking and subject to uncertainties outside the company's control. It identifies the most important risk factors as disruptions in financial markets, the company's ability to increase traffic and integrate acquisitions, develop new services, and meet debt obligations. Additional information on risk factors is available in Level 3's SEC filings. Statements should be evaluated in light of the important risk factors.
American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP) will share 2012 to 2014 plans, including 2012 ongoing earnings guidance (earnings excluding special items) and expected capital spend, during a meeting today with investors in New York.
The company is expected to announce an ongoing earnings guidance range for 2012 of $3.05 to $3.25 per share and set its 2012 capital budget at $3.1 billion. Capital expenditures for 2013 and 2014 are estimated at $3.5 billion to $3.7 billion per year.
AEP's dividend policy and expected EPS growth rate are detailed in this handout, which was shared at the Greater Chicagoland Coalition of Better Investing.
This presentation reflects conditions at the time it was delivered and do not include later developments. Updated information about current conditions can be found in the companies' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. AEP has not undertaken an obligation to update the presentation on this page.
AEP had solid financial performance for both the fourth quarter and the year. AEP benefited from favoriable weather conditions throughout most of the year, and our industrial volumes were up 4 percent in 2011.
American Electric Power will broadcast its Friday, Feb. 10, New York meeting with financial analysts and investors live over the Internet at 8 a.m. EST at http://www.aep.com/go/webcasts.
- AEP reported GAAP earnings of $1.93 per share and ongoing earnings of $1.17 per share for 3Q11.
- Key announcements included the election of Nick Akins as CEO and an increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.47 per share.
- Regulatory proceedings underway in Ohio on the transition to a competitive market and environmental rules like CSAPR and MACT standards.
- Third quarter performance was driven by a refund of $43 million in POLR charges from an Ohio ESP remand ruling, higher customer switching of $33 million, and a $19 million increase in O&M expenses.
1) AEP reported 1Q12 GAAP earnings of $0.80 per share, in line with $0.82 per share in 1Q11.
2) Utility operations earnings were $383 million in 1Q12 compared to $389 million in 1Q11, due to unfavorable weather.
3) Transmission operations earnings increased to $9 million in 1Q12 from $4 million in 1Q11.
1) AEP faces significant challenges transforming its business due to stricter environmental regulations, a shifting energy landscape, and economic pressures.
2) AEP is developing a transition plan to address grid reliability, customer costs, job creation, and a more diverse fuel portfolio in response to these changes.
3) AEP supports rational environmental regulation but is concerned about the affordability and timeline of EPA rules, which could prematurely retire some coal plants and significantly increase costs passed to customers. AEP hopes the EPA will consider feedback calling for a more flexible approach.
- The presentation discusses AEP's financial and regulatory performance in the first quarter of 2011, reaffirming earnings guidance for 2011 and 2012.
- It provides an overview of AEP's coal fleet and the potential capital costs to comply with proposed environmental rules from 2012-2020, estimating costs could range from $1.15 billion to $2.21 billion.
- The presentation also notes ongoing reviews of proposed regulations and technical assessments that could impact capital cost estimates.
What is the future of corporate reporting? AEP's Sandy Nessing, managing director of Sustainability, spoke to an MBA class at The Ohio State University's Fisher School of Business on Feb. 29, 2012, about AEP's experience, why sustainability is a growth platform as well as a risk management strategy and what the trends are in corporate reporting.
Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) held a financial conference to discuss its performance and outlook. PSEG operates power generation, transmission and distribution businesses. It provided guidance for 2007 operating earnings of $1.305-1.41 billion and EPS of $5.15-5.45. PSEG aims to achieve growth through operational excellence, financial strength, and disciplined investment. It is positioned to benefit from opportunities related to climate change initiatives, capacity needs, and infrastructure investment.
El Paso Electric provides electricity to customers in west Texas and southern New Mexico. It owns power generation facilities with a total capacity of 1,785 MW, primarily fueled by nuclear, natural gas, and coal. The company is experiencing above average customer and sales growth due to economic expansion in its service territory. El Paso Electric has a sizable capital expenditure plan over the next several years to build new infrastructure to meet increasing demand. It maintains good financial stability and credit ratings to support its investments.
The 2005 annual report summarizes Constellation Energy's strong financial performance and strategic moves that positioned it for continued success. Record earnings per share of $3.62 in 2005 represented 16% growth over 2004. Total revenues reached $17.1 billion. The company also announced a merger with FPL Group that would make it the largest competitive energy supplier and second-largest utility in the US, positioning it as an "end-game player" in industry consolidation. Chairman Mayo Shattuck expressed confidence that the company's balanced business strategy would continue delivering superior returns for shareholders in the future.
NiSource Inc. is a utility company focused on natural gas and electric utilities. It has over 3 million customers across 9 states. In 2002, NiSource focused on strengthening its balance sheet by reducing debt, streamlining operations, and shedding non-core assets. It raised $735 million through an equity offering, using the funds to further pay down debt. NiSource maintained investment-grade credit ratings while improving transparency and adhering to new governance standards. It focused on efficiently operating its regulated gas and electric utilities to serve customers in a high-demand region from Indiana to New England.
The document provides the first quarter 2009 results and outlook for CMS Energy. It includes the following key points:
- First quarter results were on plan and full year guidance remains unchanged. The common dividend was increased.
- Regulatory filings for renewable energy, energy optimization, and gas rate cases were discussed, which support a balance of customer and investor interests.
- Financial results and sensitivities for 2009 were presented, including adjusted EPS guidance of $1.25, sales and unemployment outlook, and impacts of potential factors like an auto industry bankruptcy.
- The appendix includes a GAAP reconciliation of reported versus adjusted earnings and tax benefit information.
Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2012 Investor Day Presentationgenworth_financial
The document provides an overview of Genworth MI Canada's Investor Day presentation on delivering value beyond mortgage insurance, outlining their market and strategy, sales approach, operations capabilities, and focus on providing a customer centric experience through collaboration with lenders. Genworth MI Canada aims to be a strategic growth partner for lenders by addressing their balance sheet needs, driving top line growth, and leveraging local expertise to outpace the competition.
fpl group library.corporate-library. corporate-finance17
FPL Group reported record adjusted earnings per share for 2008, driven by strong performance at NextEra Energy Resources. NextEra Energy Resources had a record year and added approximately 1,300 MW of wind capacity. FPL's earnings were challenged by a weak Florida economy and flat customer growth. FPL will seek a new rate agreement in 2009 to support investments in cleaner generation. NextEra Energy Resources continues to perform well due to contributions from new and existing projects. FPL Group expects adjusted EPS of $4.05 to $4.25 for 2009.
public serviceenterprise group media.corporatefinance20
PSEG reported 2008 income from continuing operations of $983 million, or $1.93 per share, compared to $1,325 million, or $2.60 per share in 2007. Operating earnings for 2008 were $1,487 million, or $2.92 per share compared to $1,385 million, or $2.72 per share in 2007. PSEG Power had record operating earnings of $1,050 million in 2008 and PSEG expects 2009 operating earnings to be between $1,520-1,650 million, or $3.00-$3.25 per share. PSE&G operating earnings are expected to decline in 2009 due to higher pension and technology expenses.
Iochpe-Maxion S.A reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2007. Net revenue increased 23.9% in 4Q07 and 3.3% for the full year. EBITDA grew 47.8% in 4Q07 and 1.1% for the full year. Net income increased 1,129.0% in 4Q07 and 25.1% for the full year. The results were driven by growth in the Brazilian vehicle and agricultural machinery industries as well as recovery in domestic demand for railway freight cars. Foreign exchange impacts from currency appreciation reduced revenues compared to prior periods.
The document provides reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures reported by The Pepsi Bottling Group for 2008. It identifies items affecting comparability between years, including restructuring charges, asset disposal charges, and stock-based compensation. The document summarizes the quantitative impact of these items on key financial metrics like operating income growth, earnings per share, and cash flow. It also provides guidance for 2008 operating free cash flow.
The Business Factors Index is unique within the alternative finance sector. It tracks small business turnover since July 2007 and the trends derived from this data have been collated with the results of a series of interviews conducted with more than 300 business owners across a range of sectors.
The document summarizes a presentation given by Joseph M. Rigby, CFO of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI) at an investor conference on March 28, 2006. The presentation outlines PHI's strategy to remain a regional diversified energy delivery and competitive services company focused on operational excellence. It discusses PHI's power delivery business, Conectiv Energy, and Pepco Energy Services. The presentation also provides financial performance summaries and projections showing PHI's ability to cover dividends and capital expenditures with cash from operations.
The 2006 annual report summarizes Duke Energy's accomplishments in merging with Cinergy, reducing risk through asset sales, and establishing goals for 2007 focused on establishing a unified culture and identity, optimizing operations, and achieving balanced public policy outcomes while delivering earnings and dividend growth.
This document summarizes Level 3's safe harbor statement regarding forward-looking statements. It notes that some statements made in company presentations are forward-looking and subject to uncertainties outside the company's control. It identifies the most important risk factors as disruptions in financial markets, the company's ability to increase traffic and integrate acquisitions, develop new services, and meet debt obligations. Additional information on risk factors is available in Level 3's SEC filings. Statements should be evaluated in light of the important risk factors.
American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP) will share 2012 to 2014 plans, including 2012 ongoing earnings guidance (earnings excluding special items) and expected capital spend, during a meeting today with investors in New York.
The company is expected to announce an ongoing earnings guidance range for 2012 of $3.05 to $3.25 per share and set its 2012 capital budget at $3.1 billion. Capital expenditures for 2013 and 2014 are estimated at $3.5 billion to $3.7 billion per year.
AEP's dividend policy and expected EPS growth rate are detailed in this handout, which was shared at the Greater Chicagoland Coalition of Better Investing.
This presentation reflects conditions at the time it was delivered and do not include later developments. Updated information about current conditions can be found in the companies' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. AEP has not undertaken an obligation to update the presentation on this page.
AEP had solid financial performance for both the fourth quarter and the year. AEP benefited from favoriable weather conditions throughout most of the year, and our industrial volumes were up 4 percent in 2011.
American Electric Power will broadcast its Friday, Feb. 10, New York meeting with financial analysts and investors live over the Internet at 8 a.m. EST at http://www.aep.com/go/webcasts.
- AEP reported GAAP earnings of $1.93 per share and ongoing earnings of $1.17 per share for 3Q11.
- Key announcements included the election of Nick Akins as CEO and an increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.47 per share.
- Regulatory proceedings underway in Ohio on the transition to a competitive market and environmental rules like CSAPR and MACT standards.
- Third quarter performance was driven by a refund of $43 million in POLR charges from an Ohio ESP remand ruling, higher customer switching of $33 million, and a $19 million increase in O&M expenses.
1) AEP reported 1Q12 GAAP earnings of $0.80 per share, in line with $0.82 per share in 1Q11.
2) Utility operations earnings were $383 million in 1Q12 compared to $389 million in 1Q11, due to unfavorable weather.
3) Transmission operations earnings increased to $9 million in 1Q12 from $4 million in 1Q11.
1) AEP faces significant challenges transforming its business due to stricter environmental regulations, a shifting energy landscape, and economic pressures.
2) AEP is developing a transition plan to address grid reliability, customer costs, job creation, and a more diverse fuel portfolio in response to these changes.
3) AEP supports rational environmental regulation but is concerned about the affordability and timeline of EPA rules, which could prematurely retire some coal plants and significantly increase costs passed to customers. AEP hopes the EPA will consider feedback calling for a more flexible approach.
- The presentation discusses AEP's financial and regulatory performance in the first quarter of 2011, reaffirming earnings guidance for 2011 and 2012.
- It provides an overview of AEP's coal fleet and the potential capital costs to comply with proposed environmental rules from 2012-2020, estimating costs could range from $1.15 billion to $2.21 billion.
- The presentation also notes ongoing reviews of proposed regulations and technical assessments that could impact capital cost estimates.
What is the future of corporate reporting? AEP's Sandy Nessing, managing director of Sustainability, spoke to an MBA class at The Ohio State University's Fisher School of Business on Feb. 29, 2012, about AEP's experience, why sustainability is a growth platform as well as a risk management strategy and what the trends are in corporate reporting.
Max Havelaar France en partenariat avec la Plate-Forme pour le commerce équitable (PFCE) et l’entreprise Ethiquable, ont réalisé une étude sur les pratiques de préfinancement des campagnes de production agricoles dans les filières du commerce équitable.
Cette étude s’inscrit dans le cadre du plan d’action national en faveur du commerce équitable (2013 -2016) qui vise notamment à encourager la mise en place d’outils de financements (publics et/ou privés) pour faire face aux besoins de préfinancement des importateurs et des organisations de producteurs.
L’étude cherche ainsi à identifier et disséminer les bonnes pratiques et mécanismes innovants de préfinancement des campagnes de production agricoles dans le commerce équitable.
Le travail de recherche a été mené par le réseau CERISE et animé par un comité de pilotage formé de la PFCE, de Max Havelaar France, d’Ethiquable, du ministère français des Affaires Etrangères et du Développement international, de l’Agence Française de Développement, de la Région Île–de–France et du Crédit coopératif.
Il donné lieu à la réalisation de ces fiches techniques présentant l’offre de 11 organismes financiers et 2 outils financiers innovants, le financement participatif et l’épargne salariale. Il a également permis de formuler des recommandations pour valoriser, améliorer et diffuser ces bonnes pratiques.
Brian X. Tierney, American Electric Power executive vice president and chief financial officer presented to an audience of investors at the Credit Suisse Energy Summit in Vail, Colo., on Feb. 8, 2011.
A webcast of the presentation can be accessed through the Internet at http://www.aep.com/investors/webcasts/.
During the conference, AEP reaffirmed its 2011 ongoing earnings guidance of $3.00 to $3.20 per share.
This document provides an overview of a Midwest Utilities Seminar held in April 2008. It discusses Ameren Corporation, a regional electric and gas utility operating in Missouri and Illinois. The presentation outlines Ameren's business segments and strategy to achieve operational excellence and regulatory frameworks that support earnings growth. Financial projections through 2012 indicate a target of 4-6% annual EPS growth through rate cases and investment in regulated infrastructure. Non-regulated generation is also positioned for potential earnings growth depending on power and fuel prices.
This document provides an overview of FirstEnergy Corporation for investors attending the Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference on June 5-6, 2008. It summarizes FirstEnergy's diversified operations in competitive generation, regulated transmission and distribution. It also highlights the company's financial performance, balanced business strategy, and opportunities to realize the full potential of its generating fleet through incremental investments and mining existing assets.
This document summarizes a presentation by Xcel Energy at the EEI Financial Conference from November 9-12, 2008 in Scottsdale, Arizona. Xcel Energy discusses its strong financial position, including solid credit ratings, a recent equity issuance, and strong liquidity. It outlines capital expenditure plans and upcoming regulatory proceedings. Xcel reaffirms its strategy and earnings guidance range for 2009 of $1.45 to $1.55 per share, despite economic challenges.
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy Inc.'s upcoming presentation at the EEI Financial Conference from November 9-12, 2008 in Scottsdale, Arizona. Key points include Xcel Energy maintaining solid credit ratings and a strong balance sheet. The company also discusses capital investment plans, financing strategies, and earnings guidance of $1.45 to $1.55 per share for 2009. An upcoming analyst meeting on December 3rd will provide more details on strategic, generation, renewable, and regulatory plans.
This document summarizes a presentation by Ameren, a regional electric and gas utility, at the Morgan Stanley Energy & Electricity Conference in April 2008. It discusses Ameren's business plan to achieve operational excellence, improve customer service, demonstrate environmental leadership, and maximize shareholder value. Financially, Ameren expects near-term regulatory lag due to rising costs but significant longer-term earnings growth from rate cases and increasing regulated investments. Regulated returns currently support earnings growth and regulated investment plans are expected to grow rate base and earnings.
At the analyst meeting in New York City on December 6, 2007, FirstEnergy provided regulatory updates for its utilities. In Ohio, distribution rate cases were filed requesting a $332 million increase and hearings are expected in Q1 2008. A competitive generation procurement proposal was also filed to transition to market prices by 2009. In Pennsylvania, appeals of Met-Ed and Penelec rate cases are pending in Commonwealth Court. Penn Power successfully transitioned to market prices in its POLR II case. New Jersey is implementing an Energy Master Plan to reduce demand 20% by 2020 and increase renewable energy.
This document is SunTrust Banks' 1Q 2008 earnings presentation. It discusses SunTrust's financial performance for 1Q 2008, noting earnings per share of $0.81, impacted by increased provision expenses and some non-core positive items. It also discusses SunTrust's solid capital and liquidity positions, with Tier 1 and Total Capital Ratios of 7.25% and 11.00% respectively. Finally, it outlines SunTrust's ongoing E2 efficiency and productivity program, with a goal of $500 million in benefits for 2008, up $150 million from original estimates, and a new goal of $600 million in benefits for 2009.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn its allowed rate of return and achieve earnings growth targets. It highlights Xcel's financial performance objectives and discusses its investments in infrastructure, environmental stewardship, and supportive regulatory treatment across its utility territories. The presentation also reviews Xcel's operational focus and organizational structure.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn the allowed rate of return and deliver earnings per share growth of 5-7% annually. It highlights Xcel's environmental stewardship through renewable energy initiatives and discusses regulatory support for major projects. The organizational structure and roles of key executives are also summarized.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn its allowed rate of return and achieve earnings growth targets. It highlights Xcel's financial performance objectives and discusses its investments in transmission, distribution and customer service. The presentation also provides details on Xcel's construction program, environmental stewardship initiatives, and supportive regulatory treatment across its utility territories.
xcel energy 1108Mid-Atlantic_Presentationfinance26
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy's upcoming Mid-Atlantic Investor Meetings on November 18-19, 2008. It summarizes Xcel Energy's financial position including earnings, dividends, debt, liquidity, credit ratings and capital expenditure plans. It also outlines recent and upcoming regulatory proceedings and rate cases across Xcel Energy's operating jurisdictions.
xcel energy 1108Mid-Atlantic_Presentationfinance26
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy's upcoming Mid-Atlantic Investor Meetings on November 18-19, 2008. It summarizes Xcel Energy's financial position including earnings, dividends, debt, liquidity, credit ratings and capital expenditure plans. It also outlines recent and upcoming regulatory proceedings and rate cases across Xcel Energy's operating jurisdictions.
Southern Company reported first quarter 2007 earnings of $338.7 million, or $0.45 per share, up from $261.6 million, or $0.35 per share in the first quarter of 2006. Population growth in the Southeast drove a 1.7% increase in customers and 6.7% rise in kilowatt-hour sales. However, higher interest costs partially offset these positive factors. Excluding synthetic fuels, earnings were $311 million, or $0.41 per share, up from $254 million, or $0.34 per share in the year-ago period. Southern Company expects average annual earnings growth of 5% over the long term and maintains its commitment to customer service and investment.
09 25-17 wolfe power & gas leaders conference finalAES_BigSky
The document provides an overview of the AES Corporation's presentation at the Wolfe Power & Gas Leaders Conference on September 26, 2017. It discusses AES' business operations, financial projections, growth strategies and capital allocation plans. Key points include AES targeting 8-10% annual growth in EPS and free cash flow through 2020, increasing its average contract length to 10 years by adding over 8 GW of new capacity, and improving risk profiles by reducing coal exposure and increasing US dollar-denominated cash flows.
This document provides an overview and outlook for Ameren Corporation for 2007 and 2008. It summarizes Ameren's operations, recent regulatory proceedings in Missouri and Illinois, 2007 earnings guidance, capital expenditure plans, and environmental strategy. Key points include pending rate cases in MO and IL, legislative challenges in IL regarding rate rollbacks, 2007 EPS guidance of $3.15-$3.60 excluding certain storm costs, $1.3 billion in planned capital expenditures, and $3.5-$4.5 billion in expected environmental compliance spending through 2016.
This document provides an overview of Ameren Corporation for investors. It discusses Ameren's business segments, which include regulated electric and gas utilities in Missouri and Illinois and a non-regulated generation business. The document outlines Ameren's financial outlook, including opportunities from rate cases, improving plant performance, and hedging strategies. It also discusses recent credit rating upgrades and capital market activities.
The document provides information on Ameren's annual finance meeting, including cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial measures. It summarizes Ameren's operations, recent regulatory proceedings in Missouri and Illinois, 2007 earnings guidance, environmental compliance strategy and outlook, and financial strength. Key highlights include pending rate cases, 2007 EPS guidance of $3.15-3.60 excluding certain items, $1.65-2.12 billion in expected environmental spending through 2016, and credit rating downgrades due to Illinois political uncertainty.
public serviceenterprise group Investor 03/2008finance20
PSEG introduced 2009 earnings guidance of $3.05-$3.35 per share, representing a 9-10% increase over 2008 guidance. PSEG Chairman Ralph Izzo outlined the company's strong outlook at a financial presentation, noting opportunities for earnings growth and double-digit returns for shareholders. Izzo and other senior managers reviewed expectations for each business segment. PSEG expects to generate $3 billion over 2008-2011 that could be used for growth opportunities or returning cash to shareholders.
DTE Energy reported its business and financial results for 2007. Key points include:
- Operating earnings for 2007 were $2.82 per share, driven by strong results across utility and non-utility segments.
- Detroit Edison and MichCon earned near their authorized returns on equity despite challenges from new computer systems.
- Non-utility segments like coal/gas midstream and energy trading significantly contributed to earnings.
- The company is making investments to grow its utilities and pipelines, with plans to file an updated rate case for Detroit Edison.
Cleades Robinson, a respected leader in Philadelphia's police force, is known for his diplomatic and tactful approach, fostering a strong community rapport.
UnityNet World Environment Day Abraham Project 2024 Press ReleaseLHelferty
June 12, 2024 UnityNet International (#UNI) World Environment Day Abraham Project 2024 Press Release from Markham / Mississauga, Ontario in the, Greater Tkaronto Bioregion, Canada in the North American Great Lakes Watersheds of North America (Turtle Island).
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4study presented by a Big 4
The E-Way Bill revolutionizes logistics by digitizing the documentation of goods transport, ensuring transparency, tax compliance, and streamlined processes. This mandatory, electronic system reduces delays, enhances accountability, and combats tax evasion, benefiting businesses and authorities alike. Embrace the E-Way Bill for efficient, reliable transportation operations.
ZKsync airdrop of 3.6 billion ZK tokens is scheduled by ZKsync for next week.pdfSOFTTECHHUB
The world of blockchain and decentralized technologies is about to witness a groundbreaking event. ZKsync, the pioneering Ethereum Layer 2 network, has announced the highly anticipated airdrop of its native token, ZK. This move marks a significant milestone in the protocol's journey, empowering the community to take the reins and shape the future of this revolutionary ecosystem.
Methanex is the world's largest producer and supplier of methanol. We create value through our leadership in the global production, marketing and delivery of methanol to customers. View our latest Investor Presentation for more details.
2. “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although AEP and each of its
Registrant Subsidiaries believe that their expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statements may be influenced by factors that could cause
actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements are: the economic climate and growth in, or contraction within, our service territory and changes in market demand and demographic
patterns, inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends, volatility in the financial markets, particularly developments affecting the availability of capital on reasonable
terms and developments impairing our ability to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt at attractive rates, the availability and cost of funds to
finance working capital and capital needs, particularly during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material,
electric load, customer growth and the impact of retail competition, weather conditions, including storms, and our ability to recover significant storm restoration
costs through applicable rate mechanisms, available sources and costs of, and transportation for, fuels and the creditworthiness and performance of fuel suppliers
and transporters, availability of necessary generating capacity and the performance of our generating plants, our ability to recover I&M’s Donald C. Cook Nuclear
Plant Unit 1 restoration costs through warranty, insurance and the regulatory process, our ability to recover regulatory assets and stranded costs in connection with
deregulation, our ability to recover increases in fuel and other energy costs through regulated or competitive electric rates, our ability to build or acquire generating
capacity, including the Turk Plant, and transmission line facilities (including our ability to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals and permits) when needed at
acceptable prices and terms and to recover those costs (including the costs of projects that are cancelled) through applicable rate cases or competitive rates, new
legislation, litigation and government regulation including requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, carbon, soot or particulate matter and
other substances or additional regulation of fly ash and similar combustion products that could impact the continued operation and cost recovery of our plants,
timing and resolution of pending and future rate cases, negotiations and other regulatory decisions (including rate or other recovery of new investments in
generation, distribution and transmission service and environmental compliance), resolution of litigation (including the dispute with Bank of America), our ability to
constrain operation and maintenance costs, our ability to develop and execute a strategy based on a view regarding prices of electricity, natural gas and other
energy-related commodities, changes in the creditworthiness of the counterparties with whom we have contractual arrangements, including participants in the
energy trading market, actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt, volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, coal,
nuclear fuel and other energy-related commodities, changes in utility regulation, including the implementation of ESPs and related regulation in Ohio and the
allocation of costs within regional transmission organizations, including PJM and SPP, accounting pronouncements periodically issued by accounting standard-
setting bodies, the impact of volatility in the capital markets on the value of the investments held by our pension, other postretirement benefit plans and nuclear
decommissioning trust and the impact on future funding requirements, prices and demand for power that we generate and sell at wholesale, changes in
technology, particularly with respect to new, developing or alternative sources of generation, other risks and unforeseen events, including wars, the effects of
terrorism (including increased security costs), embargoes and other catastrophic events and our ability to recover through rates the remaining unrecovered
investment, if any, in generating units that may be retired before the end of their previously projected useful lives.
Investor Relations Contacts
Chuck Zebula Bette Jo Rozsa Julie Sherwood Sara Macioch
Treasurer Managing Director Director Analyst
SVP Investor Relations Investor Relations Investor Relations Investor Relations
614-716-2800 614-716-2840 614-716-2663 614-716-2835
cezebula@aep.com bjrozsa@aep.com jasherwood@aep.com semacioch@aep.com
2
3. 2010 Highlights and 2011 Plan
2010 Highlights 2011 Plan
— 4Q10 and YTD GAAP earnings of ― Financial Performance
$0.37 and $2.53 per share,
respectively — Earnings guidance of $3.00 to
$3.20 per share
— 4Q10 and YTD on-going earnings of — Maintain fiscal discipline around
$0.38 and $ 3.03 per share, O&M and capital spending
respectively
— Regulatory Plan
— $329M in rate changes throughout
all jurisdictions, $222M net of offsets — Rate proceedings – $162M of
$235M secured (69%)
— Overall AEP System on-going ROE
of 10.75% — Ohio Filings – ESP, Distribution
Cases, Environmental Cases,
2010 SEET
— Increased quarterly dividend 12%
— Policy Update
— Total shareholder return of 8.7%
― EPA
― Transmission
3
4. AEP Ohio ESP Filing – Core Policy Issues
Investment in Ohio Jobs in Ohio Energy Security
Supports economic Jobs are a key Secure, reliable and
development and component of growth predictable electricity
essential tax base potential in Ohio supply is basis for
sustained investment and
employment in Ohio
Without regulatory assurances
Fundamental barriers must be
over time we could see loss of
addressed to attract Volatility in power prices
direct & indirect jobs related to
investment for Environmental can lead to major loss of
power generation, and
Compliance and New economic activity over time
business relocations to
Generation
surrounding states
Primary objective of ESP: Stabilize rates and support economic development in the state of Ohio
Merged Distribution
Rate Redesign 29-Month ESP Alternative Long Ohio Growth Fund Components
AEP Ohio Period Term Option
Included
Single merged Generation rates ESP period Jan 1, Alternative longer- Creation of Inclusion of certain
AEP Ohio redesigned to 2012 through May term price certainty significant private distribution
company resemble market 31,2014 (May 31 option offered for sector economic components while
presumed with pricing structures date aligns with qualifying development to pursuing a parallel
supporting PJM annual commercial & attract investment distribution base
information on an planning cycle) industrial and job growth in rate case
individual OP/CSP customers AEP Ohio service
basis territory
4
5. Summary of ESP Filing
The proposed 2012-2014 AEP Ohio ESP contains a balanced set of customer programs, investment proposals,
supply options and associated rate mechanisms. The terms of the proposed ESP offer AEP Ohio customers
stable and affordable electricity rates while offering investors reasonable financial stability and returns.
Key Provisions Included in ESP:
Generation Rate Realignment Plug-in Electric Vehicles Tariff
Alternative Longer-Term Price Certainty Option Pool Modification Provision
Fuel Adjustment Clause Mechanism Partnership with Ohio Fund
POLR Provision Economic Development Rider
Recovery of Generation Related Facility Closure Costs Distribution Investment Rider
Interruptible Power Tariff Storm Damage Recovery
Pre-tax earnings impact from proposed ESP (excluding potential earnings impact from trackers):
Net base $54MM or 1.4% in year 1 (2012)
Net base $106MM or 2.7% in year 2 (2013)
5
6. 4Q10 Performance
4Q10 Performance Drivers
Fourth Quarter Reconciliation
Firm Wholesale Margin down $17M due to the loss
Ongoing of two large wholesale customers
Earnings SEET refund of $43M related to PUCO order in the
EPS ($ in millions) 2009 SEET filing for CSPCo
4Q09 $ 0.50 $238 Non-Utility Operations/Parent decreased $37M
primarily due to a contribution to the AEP
Share Count Effect $ (0.01) Foundation and a fleet lease buyout
Firm Wholesale Margin $ (0.02) Other Utility Operations, net decreased
SEET Refund $ (0.06) approximately $88M and primarily includes the
Non-Utility Operations, net $ (0.07) absence of accidental outage insurance and higher
taxes
Other Utility Operations, net $ (0.18)
Off-System Sales $ 0.01 Off-System Sales were favorable by $10M due to
Retail Margin $ 0.02 higher prices and volume and lower sharing, offset
by lower trading
Weather $ 0.04
Rate Changes $ 0.07 Retail Margin up $18M due to increased industrial
Operations & Maintenance $ 0.08 usage
4Q10 $ 0.38 $179 Weather was favorable by $26M vs. prior year,
$15M vs. normal
Rate Changes net of offsets $51M from multiple
operating jurisdictions
O&M expense net of offsets decreased $63M
primarily due to lower storm restoration expenses
and cost savings initiatives.
6
7. December YTD Performance
Annual Performance Drivers
Annual Reconciliation
Non-Utility Operations/Parent decreased $19M primarily
due to a contribution to the AEP Foundation and a fleet
Ongoing lease buyout, somewhat offset by favorable tax
Earnings adjustments
EPS ($ in millions) SEET refund of $43M related to PUCO order in the 2009
SEET filing for CSPCo
2009 $ 2.97 $1,362
Firm Wholesale Margin down $74M due to the loss of two
large wholesale customers
Non-Utility Operations, net $ (0.05)
Share count impact due to 20M weighted average shares
SEET Refund $ (0.06) outstanding increase (459M to 479M) from equity offering
Firm Wholesale Margin $ (0.10) and DRP
Share Count Effect $ (0.14) Other Utility Operations, net decreased approximately
Other Utility Operations, net $ (0.52) $238M and primarily includes the absence of accidental
outage insurance related to the DC Cook nuclear plant
Retail Margin $ 0.07 and higher interest expense, depreciation and taxes
Off-System Sales $ 0.08 Retail Margin up $48M, due to economic recovery,
Operations & Maintenance $ 0.14 primarily in the industrial class
Weather $ 0.32 Off-System Sales increase $53M with increased sales in
Rate Changes $ 0.32 the east offsetting decreased trading/marketing profits
2010 $ 3.03 $1,451 O&M decrease of $97M net of offsets, primarily due to
lower storm restoration expenses and cost savings
initiatives
Weather was favorable by $229M vs. prior year, $164M
vs. normal
Rate Changes net of offsets of $222M from multiple
operating jurisdictions
7
9. Industrial Sales Volumes
GW h
AEP Industrial GWh by Sector
2 ,4 0 0
Pr ima r y Me ta l Ma n u f a c tu r in g
Ch e mic a l Ma n u f a c tu r in g
These 5 sectors
Pe tr o le u m a n d Co a l Pr o d u c ts Ma n u f a c tu r in g accounted for 60% of
Min in g ( e x c e p t O il & G a s ) industrial GWh in 4Q10
2 ,0 0 0 Pa p e r Ma n u f a c tu r in g
4Q10 YTD
Recovery Recovery
Industry vs 4Q09 vs 2009
Primary Metals 15.5% 6.5%
1 ,6 0 0 Chemical Manufacturing 1.9% 4.2%
Petroleum and Coal Products 6.9% 2.4%
Mining (except Oil & Gas) 4.1% 3.4%
Paper Manufacturing 5.0% 6.4%
1 ,2 0 0
800
400
-
De c - 0 3 De c - 0 4 De c - 0 5 De c - 0 6 De c - 0 7 De c - 0 8 De c - 0 9 De c - 1 0
9
10. 2011 Guidance and Business Initiatives
2011 Guidance: $3.00 - $3.20 per share
2011 Earnings Drivers Business Initiatives
Recovering Economy Operating Transcos in OH,
Rate changes (69% secured) OK and MI; filings pending in
other states
Continued O&M discipline -
$34M decrease net of offsets AEP Eastern System
Interconnection Agreement
Customer switching – Ohio
2010 SEET at Columbus Bonus Depreciation
Southern Power Capital Allocation
Off-system sales
10
15. YTD 2010 Performance Comparison
American Electric Power
Financial Results for YTD December 2010 Actual vs YTD December 2009 Actual
2009 Actual 2010 Actual
Performance Driver ($ millions) EPS Performance Driver ($ millions) EPS
UTILITY OPERATIONS:
Gross Margin:
1 East Regulated Integrated Utilities 66,976 GWh @ $ 38.0 /MWhr = 2,544 68,761 GWh @ $ 41.9 /MWhr = 2,882
2 Ohio Companies 47,468 GWh @ $ 57.6 /MWhr = 2,733 49,465 GWh @ $ 56.6 /MWhr = 2,800
3 West Regulated Integrated Utilities 38,947 GWh @ $ 30.0 /MWhr = 1,167 42,131 GWh @ $ 31.4 /MWhr = 1,322
4 Texas Wires 27,573 GWh @ $ 20.7 /MWhr = 571 27,348 GWh @ $ 22.3 /MWhr = 611
5 Off-System Sales 14,786 GWh @ $ 16.7 /MWhr = 246 19,172 GWh @ $ 15.6 /MWhr = 299
6 Transmission Revenue - 3rd Party 354 369
7 Other Operating Revenue 768 511
8 Utility Gross Margin 8,383 8,794
9 Operations & Maintenance (3,410) (3,427)
10 Depreciation & Amortization (1,561) (1,598)
11 Taxes Other than Income Taxes (751) (801)
12 Interest Exp & Preferred Dividend (919) (945)
13 Other Income & Deductions 128 154
14 Income Taxes (553) (758)
15 Utility Operations On-Going Earnings 1,317 2.87 1,419 2.97
16 Transmission Operations On-Going Earnings 4 0.01 10 0.02
NON-UTILITY OPERATIONS:
17 AEP River Operations 47 0.10 40 0.08
18 Generation & Marketing 41 0.09 25 0.05
PARENT & OTHER:
19 Parent Company On-Going Earnings (58) (83)
20 Other Investments 11 40
21 Parent & Other On-Going Earnings (47) (0.10) (43) (0.09)
22 ON-GOING EARNINGS 1,362 2.97 1,451 3.03
Note: For analysis purposes, certain financial statement amounts have been reclassified for this effect on earnings presentation.
15
16. December YTD 2010 Cash Flow
($ millio ns) 2009 20 10
O pe ra t ing A c t iv it ie s
N e t Inc o me - - R e po rt e d $ 1,3 6 5 $ 1,2 18
Depreciatio n, A mo rtization & Deferred Taxes 2,868 2,556 YTD 2010 Cash Flow Drivers:
P ensio n Contributio ns - (500)
A pplicatio n o f New Acco unting Guidance: Securitized Debt fo r Receivables - (656)
Operating Activities
Changes in Co mpo nents o f Wo rking Capital (1 2)
,21 279
Over/(Under) Fuel Reco very, Net (474) (253)
Changes in working capital largely driven
Extrao rdinary Lo ss 5 -
by coal inventory and accrued taxes.
Other A ssets & Liabilities (77) (3)
C a s h F lo ws F ro m Ope ra t ing A c t iv it ie s 2,4 7 5 2 ,6 4 1
Inv es t ing A c t iv it ie s
Investing Activities
Capital Expenditures (2,792) (2,318) Cash outlay for 2010 YTD capital
P ro ceeds o n Sale o f A ssets 278 187 investment.
Change in Other Tempo rary Cash Investments, net (89) (103)
2010 asset sale proceeds primarily relate
A cquisitio n of A ssets (104) (144)
to the transfer of assets to ETT.
Other Investing, net (209) (124)
C a s h F lo ws Use d f o r Inv e s t ing A c t iv it ie s ( 2 ,9 16) ( 2 ,5 0 2 )
F ina nc ing A c t iv it ie s Financing Activities
Co mmon Shares Issued, net 1,728 93
Changes in long-term debt driven by
Lo ng-term Debt Issuances, net 1,490 (723)
reduced capital funding requirements.
Sho rt-term Debt Increase/(Decrease), net (1,850) 564
A pplicatio n o f New Acco unting Guidance: Securitized Debt fo r Receivables
Changes in short term debt relate to funding
- 656
of severance activity and voluntary pension
Other Financing (90) (1 )
01
funding.
Dividends Paid (758) (824)
C a s h F lo ws F ro m ( Us e d f o r) F ina nc ing A c t iv it ie s 520 (335)
C a s h F ro m C o nt inuing O pe ra t io ns $ 79 $ ( 19 6 )
Beginning Cash & Cash Equivalent Balances 411 490
Ending Cash & Cash Equivalent B alances $ 490 $ 294
16
17. Capitalization & Liquidity
70% Total Debt/Capitalization Current Liquidity Summary
65% Liquidity Summary Actual
62.5% (unadited) 12/31/10
60.7% ($ in millions) Amount Maturity
60% 59.1% 59.1% Revolving Credit Facility $1,500 Jun-13
58.5%
58.1% 57.7% Revolving Credit Facility 1,454 Apr-12
57.2% 57.2% 57.0% 1
Revolving Credit Facility 478 Apr-11
Total Credit Facilities 3,432
55%
Plus
Cash & Cash Equivalents 294
50%
Less
Commercial Paper Outstanding (650)
45% Letters of Credit Issued (124)
Letters of Credit Issued for VRDNs (477)
Net Available Liquidity $2,475
40%
10
10
10
10
A
A
A
A
A
A
04
05
06
07
08
09
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
Note: Total Debt is calculated according to GAAP and includes securitized debt
: Effective January 1, 2010 in accordance with Transfers and Servicing accounting
1
guidance (formerly SFAS 166), factored receivables of AEP Credit of $750 million are
classified as short-term debt; The 4Q2010 debt/capitalization ratio would be 56.1%,
excluding AEP Credit. 17
21. Retail Rate Performance
Rate Changes, net of Rate Changes, net of
trackers (in millions) trackers (in millions)
4Q10 vs. 4Q09 YTD10 vs. YTD09
East Regulated
East Regulated
$46 Integrated $141
Integrated Utilities
Utilities
Ohio Companies -$7 Ohio Companies $20
West Regulated
West Regulated
$12 Integrated $61
Integrated Utilities
Utilities
Texas Wires $0 Texas Wires $0
AEP System Total $51 AEP System Total $222
Impact on EPS $0.07 Impact on EPS $0.32
21
22. 4Q10 Retail Performance
Retail Load* Weather Impact
(weather normalized) (in millions)
4Q10 vs. 4Q09 4Q10 vs. 4Q09
East Regulated
East Regulated
1.8% Integrated $21
Integrated Utilities
Utilities
Ohio Companies 4.2% Ohio Companies $8
West Regulated
West Regulated
4.2% Integrated $1
Integrated Utilities
Utilities
Texas Wires -4.8% Texas Wires ($3)
Impact on EPS $0.02 Impact on EPS $0.04
*Excludes Firm Wholesale Load May not foot due to rounding
22
23. YTD 2010 Retail Performance
Retail Load* Weather Impact
(weather normalized) (in millions)
YTD10 vs. YTD09 YTD10 vs. YTD09
East Regulated
East Regulated
2.1% Integrated $96
Integrated Utilities
Utilities
Ohio Companies 1.2% Ohio Companies $77
West Regulated
West Regulated
3.0% Integrated $61
Integrated Utilities
Utilities
Texas Wires 1.0% Texas Wires ($5)
Impact on EPS $0.07 Impact on EPS $0.32
*Excludes Firm Wholesale Load
23
24. Off System Sales Gross Margin Detail
4Q10 Physical off-system sales margins
4Q09 4Q10
exceeded last year by $18M
GWh Realization ($millions) GWh Realization ($millions)
OSS Physical Sales 4,039 $ 8.12 $ 33 3,133 $ 16.34 $ 51 Volumes down 22% versus last
Marketing/Trading - $ 35 - $ 21 year
Pre-Sharing Gross Margin 4,039 $ 68 3,133 $ 73
Margin Shared $ (23) $ (17) Improved AEP/Dayton Hub pricing:
Net OSS $ 45 $ 56 9% increase in liquidation prices
Lower Trading & Marketing results
by $14M
YTD10
YTD09 YTD10
GWh Realization ($millions) GWh Realization ($millions) Physical off-system sales margins
OSS Physical Sales 14,786 $ 10.87 $ 161 19,172 $ 15.12 $ 290 exceeded last year by $129M
Marketing/Trading - $ 176 - $ 126
Pre-Sharing Gross Margin 14,786 $ 337 19,172 $ 416 Volumes up 30% versus last year
Margin Shared $ (90) $ (117)
Net OSS $ 246 $ 299
Improved AEP/Dayton Hub pricing:
14% increase in liquidation prices
Lower Trading & Marketing results
by $50M
24
25. Off-System Sales
AEP Dayton 7X24 Day Ahead Prices
2010 Liquidations and 2011 Forward
4Q10 vs. 4Q09
$50.00
Q4 2010 Liquidations vs. Q4 2009 Liquidations ($/MWh)
Hub 2009 2010 $ Change % Change
AEP Dayton 32.26 35.29 3.03 9%
PJM West 37.65 43.56 5.91 16% $40.00
$/MWh
NiHub 29.1 27.41 -1.69 -6%
CinHub 29.67 32.04 2.37 8%
SPP 35.38 28.21 -7.17 -20%
Natural Gas ($/mmBtu) 4.26 3.78 -0.48 -11% $30.00
$20.00
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 2011
YTD10 vs. YTD09
YTD 2010 Liquidations vs. YTD 2009 Liquidations ($/MWh)
Hub 2009 2010 $ Change % Change 2011 Forwards vs. Full Year 2010 Liquidations ($/MWh)
AEP Dayton 32.98 37.59 4.61 14% Hub 2010 2011 $ Change % Change
PJM West 38.75 46.59 7.84 20% AEP Dayton 37.59 37.07 (0.52) -1%
NiHub 28.69 33.13 4.44 15% PJM West 46.59 45.4 (1.19) -3%
CinHub 29.46 34.81 5.35 18% NiHub 33.13 30.95 (2.18) -7%
SPP 29.11 32.45 3.34 11% CinHub 34.81 32.96 (1.85) -5%
SPP 32.45 30.64 (1.81) -6%
Natural Gas ($/mmBtu) 3.92 4.37 0.45 11%
Natural Gas ($/mmBtu) 4.37 4.63 0.26 6%
Power forwards and NG futures as of January 18, 2011
25