I want a powerpoint presentation of about 20 slides with picture and some brief definition about the contents of the pdf. I dont want too much text in each slide. the last 30 pages of the pdf are useless so i dont want them in my presentation.
1. The document discusses addition reactions of C-C multiple bonds, specifically alkenes and alkynes. It describes various reagents that add across the double or triple bonds, such as hydrogen halides, water, and halogens.
2. Markovnikov's rule is explained, stating that hydrogen adds to the carbon with more hydrogen substituents in alkene additions. Anti-Markovnikov additions are also possible using peroxides.
3. Methods to form alcohols from alkenes like acid-catalyzed hydration and oxymercuration-demercuration are described.
1. The document discusses addition reactions of C-C multiple bonds, specifically alkenes and alkynes. It describes various reagents that add across the double or triple bonds, such as hydrogen halides, water, and halogens.
2. Markovnikov's rule is explained, stating that hydrogen adds to the carbon with more hydrogen substituents in alkene additions. Anti-Markovnikov additions are also possible using peroxides.
3. Methods to form alcohols from alkenes like acid-catalyzed hydration and oxymercuration-demercuration are described.
I hope You all like it. I hope It is very beneficial for you all. I really thought that you all get enough knowledge from this presentation. This presentation is about materials and their classifications. After you read this presentation you knowledge is not as before.
(27) session 27 electrophilic addition of alkynesNixon Hamutumwa
This document discusses electrophilic addition reactions of alkynes. It begins by explaining that alkynes are electron-rich and can react with electrophiles. It then covers several specific electrophilic addition reactions: addition of hydrogen to form alkenes, addition of hydrogen halides to form alkenes, and addition of water to form ketones. For each reaction, it provides examples and discusses factors that determine reaction products such as stability of carbocation intermediates and Markovnikov's rule.
This document provides an overview of alkenes and alkynes reactions. It discusses addition reactions of alkenes including hydrohalogenation, hydration, halogenation, hydrogenation, oxidation, and polymerization. It also covers conjugated dienes, the Diels-Alder reaction, and drawing resonance forms. For alkynes, the document discusses reduction, addition reactions, hydration, oxidative cleavage, acidity, and acetylide anion formation and reactions.
(26) session 26 electrophilic addition of alkenesNixon Hamutumwa
The document discusses electrophilic addition reactions of alkenes. It describes how alkenes react with electrophiles by breaking the pi bond to form new sigma bonds. Specific reactions covered include addition of hydrogen halides, water, alcohols and hydrogen. The mechanism and products of each reaction are explained. Markovnikov's rule for the regioselectivity of hydrogen halide additions is also covered.
1. Electrophilic aromatic substitution is the characteristic reaction of benzene rings. A hydrogen atom is replaced by an electrophile through a two-step mechanism involving a resonance-stabilized cyclohexadienyl carbocation intermediate.
2. Substituents on benzene rings activate or deactivate the ring towards electrophilic aromatic substitution by influencing the stability of the carbocation intermediate. Electron-donating groups activate the ring while electron-withdrawing groups deactivate it.
3. The identity of existing substituents determines the orientation of new substituents, favoring either ortho/para or meta positions in electrophilic aromatic substitution.
This document discusses various electrophilic addition reactions involving alkenes, including:
1. Markovnikov's rule and the mechanisms of halogenation, halohydrin formation, oxymercuration, and hydroboration reactions.
2. The stereochemistry and selectivity of addition for these reactions. Anti addition and Markovnikov selectivity are common.
3. Other reactions producing diols from alkenes, such as osmium tetroxide catalyzed dihydroxylation, epoxide openings, and permanganate hydroxylation.
1. The document discusses addition reactions of C-C multiple bonds, specifically alkenes and alkynes. It describes various reagents that add across the double or triple bonds, such as hydrogen halides, water, and halogens.
2. Markovnikov's rule is explained, stating that hydrogen adds to the carbon with more hydrogen substituents in alkene additions. Anti-Markovnikov additions are also possible using peroxides.
3. Methods to form alcohols from alkenes like acid-catalyzed hydration and oxymercuration-demercuration are described.
1. The document discusses addition reactions of C-C multiple bonds, specifically alkenes and alkynes. It describes various reagents that add across the double or triple bonds, such as hydrogen halides, water, and halogens.
2. Markovnikov's rule is explained, stating that hydrogen adds to the carbon with more hydrogen substituents in alkene additions. Anti-Markovnikov additions are also possible using peroxides.
3. Methods to form alcohols from alkenes like acid-catalyzed hydration and oxymercuration-demercuration are described.
I hope You all like it. I hope It is very beneficial for you all. I really thought that you all get enough knowledge from this presentation. This presentation is about materials and their classifications. After you read this presentation you knowledge is not as before.
(27) session 27 electrophilic addition of alkynesNixon Hamutumwa
This document discusses electrophilic addition reactions of alkynes. It begins by explaining that alkynes are electron-rich and can react with electrophiles. It then covers several specific electrophilic addition reactions: addition of hydrogen to form alkenes, addition of hydrogen halides to form alkenes, and addition of water to form ketones. For each reaction, it provides examples and discusses factors that determine reaction products such as stability of carbocation intermediates and Markovnikov's rule.
This document provides an overview of alkenes and alkynes reactions. It discusses addition reactions of alkenes including hydrohalogenation, hydration, halogenation, hydrogenation, oxidation, and polymerization. It also covers conjugated dienes, the Diels-Alder reaction, and drawing resonance forms. For alkynes, the document discusses reduction, addition reactions, hydration, oxidative cleavage, acidity, and acetylide anion formation and reactions.
(26) session 26 electrophilic addition of alkenesNixon Hamutumwa
The document discusses electrophilic addition reactions of alkenes. It describes how alkenes react with electrophiles by breaking the pi bond to form new sigma bonds. Specific reactions covered include addition of hydrogen halides, water, alcohols and hydrogen. The mechanism and products of each reaction are explained. Markovnikov's rule for the regioselectivity of hydrogen halide additions is also covered.
1. Electrophilic aromatic substitution is the characteristic reaction of benzene rings. A hydrogen atom is replaced by an electrophile through a two-step mechanism involving a resonance-stabilized cyclohexadienyl carbocation intermediate.
2. Substituents on benzene rings activate or deactivate the ring towards electrophilic aromatic substitution by influencing the stability of the carbocation intermediate. Electron-donating groups activate the ring while electron-withdrawing groups deactivate it.
3. The identity of existing substituents determines the orientation of new substituents, favoring either ortho/para or meta positions in electrophilic aromatic substitution.
This document discusses various electrophilic addition reactions involving alkenes, including:
1. Markovnikov's rule and the mechanisms of halogenation, halohydrin formation, oxymercuration, and hydroboration reactions.
2. The stereochemistry and selectivity of addition for these reactions. Anti addition and Markovnikov selectivity are common.
3. Other reactions producing diols from alkenes, such as osmium tetroxide catalyzed dihydroxylation, epoxide openings, and permanganate hydroxylation.
The document discusses several examples of homogeneous catalysis including hydrogenation, hydroformylation, hydrocyanation, and Wilkinson's catalyst. It provides details on the mechanisms and applications of these reactions. Homogeneous catalysis refers to reactions where the catalyst is in the same phase as the reactants, usually liquid phase. The catalysts are molecularly dispersed and mass transfer limitations are less of an issue.
Aldehydes and ketones contain a carbonyl group (>C=O) and can undergo numerous reactions. In aldehydes, the carbonyl is bonded to one alkyl group and one hydrogen. In ketones, it is bonded to two alkyl groups. Common reactions include reduction to alcohols using LiAlH4 or NaBH4, addition of Grignard reagents, and reactions involving the acidic alpha-hydrogens like benzoin condensation, Cannizzaro reaction, and Clemmenson reduction. Other important reactions are the Wittig reaction, Knoevenagel condensation, Wolf-Kishner reduction, and Baeyer-Villiger oxidation.
Alkenes are unsaturated hydrocarbons that contain at least one carbon-carbon double bond. The simplest alkene is ethylene, with the formula C2H4. Alkenes react through addition reactions that break the pi bond of the double bond. They are industrially important as they can be polymerized to make plastics like polyethylene and polypropylene. Alkenes names are formed by replacing the '-ane' suffix of the parent alkane with '-ene', and the location of the double bond is indicated by a number prefix.
This document provides information on the topic of homogeneous catalysis. It discusses several types of homogeneous catalysis including hydrogenation, hydroformylation, hydrocyanation, and Wilkinson catalysts. Hydrogenation involves adding hydrogen to organic compounds using molecular hydrogen and a catalyst. Hydroformylation adds a formyl group and hydrogen to an alkene. Hydrocyanation converts alkenes to nitriles. Wilkinson's catalyst is [RhCl(PPh3)3] and is widely used for hydrogenation reactions.
Aldehydes and ketones contain the carbonyl group. Aldehydes are considered the most important functional group. Ketones A carbon double bonded to an oxygen is called a carbonyl group. Compounds in which the carbon of a carbonyl group is bonded to two other carbons
1. Alcohols and phenols are formed when a hydrogen atom in a hydrocarbon is replaced by a -OH group, attaching directly to carbon.
2. Alcohols contain a -OH group attached to an aliphatic carbon, while phenols have -OH attached to an aromatic carbon. Ethers are formed when a hydrogen is replaced by an alkoxy or aryloxy group.
3. Alcohols and phenols can be classified as mono-, di-, tri-, or polyhydric depending on the number of hydroxyl groups, and monohydric alcohols are further classified based on the hybridization of the carbon bearing the hydroxyl group.
IMPORTANT NAMED REACTIONS in Organic synthesis with Introduction, General Mechanism, and their synthetic application covering more than 20 named reactions in it.
The video lecture for this presentation is available at the following link on YouTube
https://youtu.be/3sxal579RNM
The presenation will be useful for Ug/PG (Chemistry) students
The document discusses various aromatic electrophilic substitution reactions including Vilsmeier-Haack formylation, Reimer-Tiemann reaction, Gattermann-Koch formylation, and Kolbe-Schmitt reaction. It provides details on the reaction conditions, mechanisms, substrates used, and products formed for each reaction. It also discusses some exceptions and problems related to these reactions.
The document discusses aromatic electrophilic substitution reactions including the Vilsmeier-Haack formylation, Reimer-Tiemann reaction, Gattermann-Koch formylation, and diazo coupling reactions. It provides background on the reactions, their mechanisms, substrates used, and factors that influence product distribution. Examples and problems are also given to illustrate the application of these reactions in synthesis.
Halohydrocarbons are derivatives of hydrocarbons where one or more hydrogen atoms are replaced by halogen atoms. There are several types including alkyl halides, aryl halides, vinyl halides, and benzyl halides. Halohydrocarbons can undergo nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions. The reactivity depends on factors like the stability of carbocation intermediates, the nature of the leaving group, and solvent polarity. Vinyl and aryl halides are more resistant to substitution due to conjugation effects.
A green synthesis of isatoic anhydrides from isatins with urea–hydrogen perox...fer18400
The document describes a green synthesis method for producing isatoic anhydrides from isatins using urea-hydrogen peroxide complex and ultrasound irradiation. Four reaction procedures were tested using urea-hydrogen peroxide as the oxidizing agent and sulfuric acid as a catalyst. The procedures used either acetic anhydride/acetic acid or formic acid as solvents. Ultrasound irradiation was found to dramatically reduce reaction times from 2-24 hours down to 20-135 minutes. The method provides isatoic anhydrides in good yields and with high purity under mild conditions. Combining formic acid and ultrasound yielded the best results for most isatins tested.
(i) The document discusses elimination reactions, specifically the E2 and E1 mechanisms.
(ii) The E2 reaction is bimolecular and results in retention of stereochemistry. The E1 reaction is unimolecular and results in loss of stereochemistry.
(iii) Key factors that influence whether an elimination reaction proceeds by E2 or E1 include temperature, solvent, and the stereoelectronic effects of the starting material. Higher temperatures and polar protic solvents favor E1, while less sterically hindered substrates favor E2.
This document summarizes key information about alcohols and phenols. It defines alcohols as compounds containing hydroxyl groups bonded to carbon atoms, and phenols as having hydroxyl groups bonded to aromatic carbons. Alcohols and phenols are classified based on the number and position of hydroxyl groups. The document also discusses the structures, properties, nomenclature and reactions of alcohols, phenols, and ethers.
Standard continuum dielectric models horribly overpredict the Gibbs energy for water autoionization by 26-50 kcal/mol. Explicitly including 4 water molecules in a "semicontinuum" approach can reduce this error to only 2 kcal/mol. Various continuum and cluster models were examined to understand why standard models fail and how including explicit waters improves predictions. The study recommends including 3 waters around hydronium and 4 waters around hydroxide when modeling these ions.
The document describes various reactions of alkenes including hydration, hydroboration, epoxidation, and oxidation to 1,2-diols. It discusses the mechanisms and stereochemistry of acid-catalyzed hydration of alkenes, hydroboration-oxidation, and epoxidation using m-CPBA. It also covers the opening of epoxides to form anti- and syn-1,2-diols using acidic/basic conditions and the Prevost, Woodward, osmium tetroxide, and potassium permanganate oxidation methods.
1) Alcohols and phenols are formed when a hydrogen atom in a hydrocarbon is replaced by an -OH group, attached to either a sp3 carbon (alcohols) or sp2 carbon (phenols).
2) Ethers are formed when a hydrogen atom in a hydrocarbon is replaced by an alkoxy or aryloxy group.
3) Alcohols and phenols can be classified based on the number of hydroxyl groups as mono-, di-, tri-, or polyhydric compounds. Ethers can be classified as symmetrical or unsymmetrical.
This document summarizes key information about alkenes (olefins):
1) Alkenes contain carbon-carbon double bonds and are classified as unsaturated hydrocarbons. Common examples include ethylene and propene.
2) Alkenes undergo characteristic reactions such as addition of halogens, hydrogenation to form alkanes, hydration and polymerization. Many of these reactions follow Markovnikov's rule.
3) Alkenes are industrially important as monomers for polymers like polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC and polystyrene. Ethylene and propylene are the largest volume organic chemicals produced.
This document summarizes key differences between aldehydes and ketones. Aldehydes contain a carbonyl group attached to one carbon, while ketones have the carbonyl between two carbons. Aldehydes are easily oxidized to carboxylic acids, while ketones require more vigorous oxidation. Both can undergo nucleophilic addition reactions to form alcohols. Common tests to distinguish the two include Tollen's reagent and Fehling's reagent.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...AbdullaAlAsif1
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
The document discusses several examples of homogeneous catalysis including hydrogenation, hydroformylation, hydrocyanation, and Wilkinson's catalyst. It provides details on the mechanisms and applications of these reactions. Homogeneous catalysis refers to reactions where the catalyst is in the same phase as the reactants, usually liquid phase. The catalysts are molecularly dispersed and mass transfer limitations are less of an issue.
Aldehydes and ketones contain a carbonyl group (>C=O) and can undergo numerous reactions. In aldehydes, the carbonyl is bonded to one alkyl group and one hydrogen. In ketones, it is bonded to two alkyl groups. Common reactions include reduction to alcohols using LiAlH4 or NaBH4, addition of Grignard reagents, and reactions involving the acidic alpha-hydrogens like benzoin condensation, Cannizzaro reaction, and Clemmenson reduction. Other important reactions are the Wittig reaction, Knoevenagel condensation, Wolf-Kishner reduction, and Baeyer-Villiger oxidation.
Alkenes are unsaturated hydrocarbons that contain at least one carbon-carbon double bond. The simplest alkene is ethylene, with the formula C2H4. Alkenes react through addition reactions that break the pi bond of the double bond. They are industrially important as they can be polymerized to make plastics like polyethylene and polypropylene. Alkenes names are formed by replacing the '-ane' suffix of the parent alkane with '-ene', and the location of the double bond is indicated by a number prefix.
This document provides information on the topic of homogeneous catalysis. It discusses several types of homogeneous catalysis including hydrogenation, hydroformylation, hydrocyanation, and Wilkinson catalysts. Hydrogenation involves adding hydrogen to organic compounds using molecular hydrogen and a catalyst. Hydroformylation adds a formyl group and hydrogen to an alkene. Hydrocyanation converts alkenes to nitriles. Wilkinson's catalyst is [RhCl(PPh3)3] and is widely used for hydrogenation reactions.
Aldehydes and ketones contain the carbonyl group. Aldehydes are considered the most important functional group. Ketones A carbon double bonded to an oxygen is called a carbonyl group. Compounds in which the carbon of a carbonyl group is bonded to two other carbons
1. Alcohols and phenols are formed when a hydrogen atom in a hydrocarbon is replaced by a -OH group, attaching directly to carbon.
2. Alcohols contain a -OH group attached to an aliphatic carbon, while phenols have -OH attached to an aromatic carbon. Ethers are formed when a hydrogen is replaced by an alkoxy or aryloxy group.
3. Alcohols and phenols can be classified as mono-, di-, tri-, or polyhydric depending on the number of hydroxyl groups, and monohydric alcohols are further classified based on the hybridization of the carbon bearing the hydroxyl group.
IMPORTANT NAMED REACTIONS in Organic synthesis with Introduction, General Mechanism, and their synthetic application covering more than 20 named reactions in it.
The video lecture for this presentation is available at the following link on YouTube
https://youtu.be/3sxal579RNM
The presenation will be useful for Ug/PG (Chemistry) students
The document discusses various aromatic electrophilic substitution reactions including Vilsmeier-Haack formylation, Reimer-Tiemann reaction, Gattermann-Koch formylation, and Kolbe-Schmitt reaction. It provides details on the reaction conditions, mechanisms, substrates used, and products formed for each reaction. It also discusses some exceptions and problems related to these reactions.
The document discusses aromatic electrophilic substitution reactions including the Vilsmeier-Haack formylation, Reimer-Tiemann reaction, Gattermann-Koch formylation, and diazo coupling reactions. It provides background on the reactions, their mechanisms, substrates used, and factors that influence product distribution. Examples and problems are also given to illustrate the application of these reactions in synthesis.
Halohydrocarbons are derivatives of hydrocarbons where one or more hydrogen atoms are replaced by halogen atoms. There are several types including alkyl halides, aryl halides, vinyl halides, and benzyl halides. Halohydrocarbons can undergo nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions. The reactivity depends on factors like the stability of carbocation intermediates, the nature of the leaving group, and solvent polarity. Vinyl and aryl halides are more resistant to substitution due to conjugation effects.
A green synthesis of isatoic anhydrides from isatins with urea–hydrogen perox...fer18400
The document describes a green synthesis method for producing isatoic anhydrides from isatins using urea-hydrogen peroxide complex and ultrasound irradiation. Four reaction procedures were tested using urea-hydrogen peroxide as the oxidizing agent and sulfuric acid as a catalyst. The procedures used either acetic anhydride/acetic acid or formic acid as solvents. Ultrasound irradiation was found to dramatically reduce reaction times from 2-24 hours down to 20-135 minutes. The method provides isatoic anhydrides in good yields and with high purity under mild conditions. Combining formic acid and ultrasound yielded the best results for most isatins tested.
(i) The document discusses elimination reactions, specifically the E2 and E1 mechanisms.
(ii) The E2 reaction is bimolecular and results in retention of stereochemistry. The E1 reaction is unimolecular and results in loss of stereochemistry.
(iii) Key factors that influence whether an elimination reaction proceeds by E2 or E1 include temperature, solvent, and the stereoelectronic effects of the starting material. Higher temperatures and polar protic solvents favor E1, while less sterically hindered substrates favor E2.
This document summarizes key information about alcohols and phenols. It defines alcohols as compounds containing hydroxyl groups bonded to carbon atoms, and phenols as having hydroxyl groups bonded to aromatic carbons. Alcohols and phenols are classified based on the number and position of hydroxyl groups. The document also discusses the structures, properties, nomenclature and reactions of alcohols, phenols, and ethers.
Standard continuum dielectric models horribly overpredict the Gibbs energy for water autoionization by 26-50 kcal/mol. Explicitly including 4 water molecules in a "semicontinuum" approach can reduce this error to only 2 kcal/mol. Various continuum and cluster models were examined to understand why standard models fail and how including explicit waters improves predictions. The study recommends including 3 waters around hydronium and 4 waters around hydroxide when modeling these ions.
The document describes various reactions of alkenes including hydration, hydroboration, epoxidation, and oxidation to 1,2-diols. It discusses the mechanisms and stereochemistry of acid-catalyzed hydration of alkenes, hydroboration-oxidation, and epoxidation using m-CPBA. It also covers the opening of epoxides to form anti- and syn-1,2-diols using acidic/basic conditions and the Prevost, Woodward, osmium tetroxide, and potassium permanganate oxidation methods.
1) Alcohols and phenols are formed when a hydrogen atom in a hydrocarbon is replaced by an -OH group, attached to either a sp3 carbon (alcohols) or sp2 carbon (phenols).
2) Ethers are formed when a hydrogen atom in a hydrocarbon is replaced by an alkoxy or aryloxy group.
3) Alcohols and phenols can be classified based on the number of hydroxyl groups as mono-, di-, tri-, or polyhydric compounds. Ethers can be classified as symmetrical or unsymmetrical.
This document summarizes key information about alkenes (olefins):
1) Alkenes contain carbon-carbon double bonds and are classified as unsaturated hydrocarbons. Common examples include ethylene and propene.
2) Alkenes undergo characteristic reactions such as addition of halogens, hydrogenation to form alkanes, hydration and polymerization. Many of these reactions follow Markovnikov's rule.
3) Alkenes are industrially important as monomers for polymers like polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC and polystyrene. Ethylene and propylene are the largest volume organic chemicals produced.
This document summarizes key differences between aldehydes and ketones. Aldehydes contain a carbonyl group attached to one carbon, while ketones have the carbonyl between two carbons. Aldehydes are easily oxidized to carboxylic acids, while ketones require more vigorous oxidation. Both can undergo nucleophilic addition reactions to form alcohols. Common tests to distinguish the two include Tollen's reagent and Fehling's reagent.
Similar to Addition_Reactions_2_HX_addition.pdf (20)
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...AbdullaAlAsif1
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptxMAGOTI ERNEST
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
2. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
. HX Addition
6.2.1 Hydrohalogenation
Hydrogen halides add to carbon–carbon double and triple bonds to yield halo-
genated hydrocarbons. The reactivity of the four hydrogen halides is in the
order HI > HBr > HCl > HF. HI and HBr, the two most reactive compounds,
add readily at room temperature to unsaturated hydrocarbons. HCl requires
heating or a catalyst, whereas HF often exhibits irregular behavior. Most stud-
ies of hydrohalogenations have focused on the use of HCl and HBr.110
Alkenes The reaction of hydrogen halides with alkenes is generally an elec-
trophilic addition. It occurs by a variety of mechanisms and involves a carboca-
tion intermediate in many cases. As a result, rearrangements may be observed,
and solvent incorporation may occur. The regioselectivity of the addition to
unsymmetrical double bounds is in accord with the Markovnikov rule; specif-
ically, the hydrogen adds to the site with the highest electron density. Stereo-
chemistry of electrophilic addition of hydrogen halides to alkenes may be syn
or anti. Reaction conditions, the nature of the solvent, and the structure of the
reacting alkene affect the stereochemical outcome of the reaction.
In contrast to HCl and HBr addition, there are no such systematic stud-
ies concerning the addition of HF and HI to alkenes. Aqueous HF exhibits
rather low reactivity toward alkenes, and anhydrous liquid HF is used instead
to effect hydrofluorination.111,112 Because of its low boiling point, high tox-
icity, and corrosive nature, alternative reagents were developed. The com-
bination of HF with organic bases gives more suitable reagents.113 They
react with alkenes in typical Markovnikov-type addition. Of these, pyri-
dinium poly(hydrogen fluoride)114–116 (PPHF, so called Olah’s reagent) and
melamine–HF solution117 are used most frequently. An effective solid flu-
orinating agent, a polymer-supported HF reagent, is prepared from poly-
4-vinylpyridine and anhydrous HF. Easy handling and convenient work-up
make polyvinylpyridinium poly(hydrogen fluoride)118,119 (PVPHF) an attrac-
tive reagent [Eq. (6.8)]. Olah and coworkers have developed stable dialkyl
ether/poly(hydrogen fluoride) complexes with cyclic poly(hydrogen fluoride)
bridge structure.120 The dimethyl ether–poly(hydrogen fluoride) complex
(DMEPHF) was shown to be a convenient and efficient fluorinating agent.
A Pd-catalyzed sequential regiospecific, syn-selective addition of H− and
“F+” to styrenes furnishes the corresponding benzyl fluorides in high yields
([Pd(PPh3)]4, Selectfluor, Et3SiH).121
PVPHF
CH2Cl2, 0−20 °C, 1−6 h
R
( )n ( )n
R = H, Me, n = 2, 3, 8
2,3-diMe-but-2-ene, norbornene
60−80%
F
R
(6.8)
3. 6 Addition Reactions
Detailed, wide-ranging studies are available on the addition of HCl and HBr
to alkenes.3,112,122 The most useful procedure is to react dry HCl gas and the
alkene neat or in an inert organic solvent. Water or acetic acid may also be
used. Alkenes yielding tertiary or benzylic alkyl chlorides react most readily.
Styrene, however, adds HCl only at −80 ◦C to give α-chloroethylbenzene with-
out polymerization.123 At more elevated (room) temperature, polymerization
prevails. HBr adds to alkenes in an exothermic process more rapidly than does
HCl. Rearrangements may occur during addition indicating the involvement of
a carbocation intermediate124 [Eq. (6.9)].
Cl
Cl
HCl
25 °C
neat 50% 50%
CH3NO2 17% 83%
+
(6.9)
A similar conclusion can be drawn from the higher reactivity of 1,1-
dialkylalkenes compared with 1,2-dialkylalkenes. Norbornene and related
bicyclic olefins were shown to react with HCl via the classical norbornyl cations
prior to full equilibration.125,126 The stereochemistry of addition may be syn
or anti. Product distributions can be strongly affected by the solvent used127
[Eq. (6.10)].
HCl
30 min
H
Cl
H
Cl
+
CH2Cl2, −98 °C 88% 12%
Et2O, 0 °C 5% 95%
(6.10)
Acenaphthylene, indene, and cis- and trans-1-phenylpropene, all possessing the
double bond in conjugation with an aromatic system, were found to react with
hydrogen halides in nonpolar solvents to give predominantly syn addition prod-
ucts.128 This stereochemistry is consistent with an AdE2 mechanism in which
the undissociated hydrogen halide reacts with the alkene (Scheme 6.2). First ion
pair 7 is formed with the halide ion retained on the same side of the alkene as
the hydrogen. Collapse of 7 gives exclusively the syn product. If the ion pair has
a long enough lifetime, the halide ion may migrate to the opposite side of the
planar carbocation to give the ion pair 8. Collapse of the latter leads to the anti
product. A similar ion-pair mechanism is operative in the hydrochlorination of
3,3-dimethylbutene and styrene in acetic acid.129
In contrast, kinetic studies indicate that another mechanism may also be
operative. It was found that the rate law for the addition of HCl and HBr to
alkenes in nonprotic solvents (hydrocarbons, diethyl ether, nitromethane) is
typically overall third order3,122,124,130 or even higher.131,132 It is usually first
order in the alkene and second order in the hydrogen halide. A slow irreversible
4. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
C C C C
H X−
C
H
C
X
C C
H
+
C
H
C
X
7
8
+
X−
HX
Scheme .
proton transfer from the undissociated molecule to the alkene was shown to
be rate determining. The second molecule of HX assists this proton transfer
by bonding to the developing halide ion. This is a typical AdE3 mechanism
[Eq. (6.11)].
CH=CH2
R + 2HX RCHCH3 + HX2
−
+
slow fast
RCHCH3
X
+ HX
(6.11)
A more detailed picture could be obtained from the results of stereochemi-
cal studies.3,133 Since 1,2-dimethylcyclohexene, 1,6-dimethylcyclohexene, and
2-methylmethylenecyclohexane give different proportions of cis- and trans-
1,2-dimethylbromocyclohexanes, simultaneous formation of the C–H and
the C–Br bonds was suggested.134 A similar conclusion was reached based
on the stereoselective, predominantly anti addition of HCl and HBr to 1,2-
dimethylcyclopentene in pentane.135
The addition of DBr in AcOD to cyclopentene yields deuterocyclopentyl bro-
mide and deuterocyclopentyl acetate, both formed with better than 96% anti
stereoselectivity.136 A concerted anti AdE3 transition state (9) is consistent
with these and other experimental observations. A similar but syn transition
state (10) was evoked to explain the somewhat decreased degree of anti addi-
tion (84–85%) in the hydrohalogenation of linear isomeric alkenes.136 The reac-
tion of [1,3,3-2H3]-cyclohexene137 and 1,2-dimethylcyclohexene138 with HCl
in AcOH was shown to form the corresponding chlorides resulting from both
syn and anti additions. In these cases, an AdE2 mechanism competes with a
concerted anti AdE3 process. High HCl concentration and addition of chloride
salts such as Me4NCl favor the AdE3 mechanism.
C
H
C
Nu
X
E
δ−
δ+
δ+ C
H X
δ−
δ+
δ+
C
Nu
E
9 10
5. 6 Addition Reactions
Exceptions to the Markovnikov rule when hydrogen bromide reacts with
unsymmetrical alkenes have long been known.139,140 The reaction for this anti-
Markovnikov addition was explained as being a chain reaction with the involve-
ment of bromine atoms generated by peroxides.141–143 Both added peroxides
and peroxides formed by the action of the triplet oxygen (air) on the alkene are
effective.
The chain reaction is initiated by the interaction of a free radical [formed
according to Eq. (6.12)] with hydrogen bromide to form a bromine atom
[Eq. (6.13)], which, after reacting with the alkene, yields a bromoalkyl radical
[Eq. (6.14)]. The reaction of the latter with HBr yields the alkyl bromide and
regenerates the bromine atom [Eq. (6.15)].
RCOOH RO• + HO•
(6.12)
RO• + HBr ROH + Br•
(6.13)
CH2=CH2
R + Br• CHCH2
R Br (6.14)
CHCH2
R Br + HBr CH2CH2
R Br + Br•
(6.15)
Anti-Markovnikov free-radical-induced addition of HBr to alkenes can be pre-
vented by carrying out the reaction in the presence of small amounts of antiox-
idants that inhibit the reaction of oxygen with the alkene to form peroxides.
There was a significant notion that no other hydrogen halides add to alkenes,
contrary to the Markovnikov rule, even in the presence of free radicals. This
appears to be due to the difficulty of producing certain halogen radicals, par-
ticularly fluorine and chlorine, by reaction of the hydrogen halides induced by
radicals [Eq. (6.16)]. It is only in the case of bromine that the equilibrium in this
reaction is in the direction of the formation of the bromine atom.
RO• + H X ROH + X•
(6.16)
Contrary to this statement, direct anti-Markovnikov addition of HF and HCl
was accomplished by Nicewicz and coworkers using an efficient organic pho-
toredox catalyst system.144 Photoredox catalyst 11a is excited with visible light
to form acridine radical 11b, which is quenched by the alkene to form radi-
cal cation 12 (Scheme 6.3). Nucleophilic halide addition yields the more stable
Ph
Me
•+
Ph
Me
Ph
Me
X
•
HX
(X = F, Cl)
PhSH
PhS•
Ph
Me
H
X
11a 11b
12 13
Scheme .
6. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
benzylic radical 13, and, finally, hydrogen atom transfer from thiol results in
the formation of the addition product.
N
Me
Me
Me
Me
−BF4
•
+
N
Me
Me
Me
Me
+
hν (450 nm)
11a 11b
Addition of HBr in nonpolar solvents to terminal alkenes was found to give
anti-Markovnikov products even under nonradical conditions.145 Products
formed in both the normal and abnormal additions may be obtained in near
quantitative yields by changing the temperature and the reagent/reactant ratio
[Eq. (6.17)]. On the basis of theoretical calculations and spectroscopic evidence,
a molecular mechanism for the formation of HBr–alkene complexes was sug-
gested. In a large excess of HBr, a 2:1 HBr–alkene complex is formed giving the
product of the normal addition. A 1:2 complex in excess alkene, in contrast,
accounts for the anti-Markovnikov product.
C6H13CH=CH2 C6H13CHCH3 + C6H13CH2CH2Br
HBr
hexane, −78 °C
HBr/oct-1-ene = 15 98 2
HBr/oct-1-ene = 0.125 100
Br (6.17)
Concentrated HI in water or acetic acid is usually utilized in hydroiodination
of alkenes. Markovnikov products are exclusively formed, and rearrangements
may be observed.
Special reagents introduced later allow significant improvements in hydro-
halogenation of alkenes. HCl, HBr, and HI in aqueous–organic two-phase sys-
tems under phase transfer conditions readily add to alkenes affording halides
in nearly quantitative yields.146 Appropriately prepared silica and alumina
have been found to mediate the addition of HCl, HBr, and HI to alkenes.147
The method is very convenient since it uses hydrogen halides prepared
in situ148 [Eq. (6.18)].147 Competing radical addition in hydrobromination is
not observed. It is suggested that surface-bound hydrogen halides with greatly
increased acidity through polarization of the hydrogen–halogen bond proto-
nate the double bond. A rapid transfer of the halide ion from the surface follows
affording predominantly the syn addition products. Highly acidic solid catalysts
(K10 montmorillonite, ZF520 zeolite) yield the Markovnikov addition product
7. 6 Addition Reactions
with high selectivity when methylcyclohexene is reacted with SOCl2 as the HCl
precursor.149
C6H13CH=CH2
CH2Cl2, 25 °C
C6H13CHCH3
X
(COCl)2, Al2O3, 1 h, X = Cl 98%
HBr, SiO2, 0.7 h, X = Br 96%
Me3SiI, SiO2, 1 h, X = I 98%
(6.18)
A study using core-electron spectroscopy on the addition of HCl to ethylene,
propylene, and isobutylene in the gas phase concludes that a significant portion
of the difference between Markovnikov and anti-Markovnikov addition is also
due to the charge distribution in the initial state and not to different ability
of the molecules to delocalize the added charge in the transition state.150 The
increase in reactivity with increasing substitution of the double bond is also
strongly influenced by the initial-state charge distribution.
The Me3SiCl and water system is a convenient reagent for the selec-
tive hydrochlorination of alkenes. The anti selective manner of addition
was shown to occur by reacting 9(10)-octalin to afford 4α-chloro-trans-
decahydronaphthaline exclusively.151
Dienes Reaction of allenes with HCl and HBr was mostly studied.3,112
Depending on the reagent, reaction conditions, and the structure of the react-
ing molecule, markedly different product distributions may be obtained.29,152
Monoalkyl-substituted allenes give predominantly the corresponding 2-halo-
2-alkenes. Phenylallene, in contrast, is converted exclusively to cynnamyl chlo-
ride153 [Eq. (6.19)]. Mechanistic studies established the formation of carboca-
tion intermediate 14 stabilized by the conjugation with the phenyl ring.
PhCH=C=CH2
HCl Cl–
AcOH, rt, 48 h
[PhCH CH CH2]
+
PhCH CH CH2 Cl
14 95%
(6.19)
Mixtures of isomeric allylic chlorides are formed when 1,1-disubstituted allenes
react with HCl. 1,3-Disubstituted allenes yield products of both central and ter-
minal carbon attacks. In contrast, selective transformations occur with HBr.
Photocatalytic addition of HBr in the gas phase selectively gives vinylic bro-
mides154 [Eq. (6.20)], whereas hydrobromination in the solution phase yields
allylic bromides155 [Eq. (6.21)].
C=C=CH2
Me
Me
HBr
Et2O, rt, 5 days
C
Me
Me
C
Me
Br
C=CH
Me
Me
CH2Br
97%
80%
HBr
900 W mercury lamp (6.20)
(6.21)
8. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
Similar differences may be observed in hydrobromination of tetrasubstituted
allenes. Ring size and reaction conditions determine the outcome of hydro-
bromination of cyclic allenes.112 In gas-phase hydrobromination, where a radi-
cal mechanism is operative, the bromine atom always adds to the central carbon
atom of the allenic system. As a result, vinylic bromides are formed through
the stable allylic radical. In the solution phase under ionic addition conditions,
either the vinylic or the allylic cation may be the intermediate resulting in non-
selective hydrobromination. Allylic rearrangement or free-radical processes
may also affect product distributions.
Conjugated dienes may yield mixtures of products of 1,2- or 1,4-addition.
Product of 1,4-addition may be the initial product or may actually be formed
by 1,2-addition followed by isomerization. In any event, however, formation of
the 1,4-product involves isomerization of a carbocation.
Addition of HCl to buta-1,3-diene in the gas phase was shown to be a surface-
catalyzed reaction occurring at the walls between a multilayer of adsorbed HCl
and gaseous or weakly adsorbed buta-1,3-diene.156 The initial proton transfer
to the terminal carbon and the chloride attack occur almost simultaneously.
Chloride attack at C(2) or C(4) has equal probability thus producing equal
amounts of 1,2- and 1,4-addition.
The addition of 1 mol of HCl or HBr to isoprene yields the corresponding
primary halide produced through the rearrangement of the initially formed
tertiary halide112 [Eq. (6.22)]. The addition of a second molecule of hydrogen
halide gives the 1,3-dihalo compounds in good yields.157
X X
X
X
HX
HX
(6.22)
Addition of DBr to cyclohexa-1,3-diene occurs by a 1,2-anti and 1,4-syn
process,158 a conclusion also predicted by molecular orbital calculations.159
Stereospecific allylic rearrangement of the 1,2-trans product, however, even-
tually produces a reaction mixture containing predominantly cis prod-
ucts. A single chloro compound, trans-1-phenyl-3-chlorobut-1-ene (16), is
formed in hydrochlorination of isomeric 1-phenylbuta-1,3-dienes in AcOH160
(Scheme 6.4). The observation is interpreted by the formation of isomeric allylic
carbocations cis-15 and trans-15. Rapid rotation of cis-15 to trans-15 before
captured by the chloride ion ensures selective formation of 16.
Alkynes Because of their less nucleophilic character, alkynes react less readily
with hydrogen halides than alkenes and often require the use a metal halide
catalyst. Vinyl halides are formed in the reaction with 1 equiv of HX. They may
react further in an excess of the reagent to yield geminal dihalides. High yields of
these compounds can be obtained. The addition of HCl to acetylene was studied
in detail because of the practical importance of the product vinyl chloride (see
Section 6.2.4).
9. 6 Addition Reactions
Ph
Ph HCl
AcOH,18 °C
Ph
HCl
AcOH,18 °C
Ph Cl− Ph
cis-15
trans-15 16
Cl
+
+
Scheme .
In accordance with the Markovnikov rule, terminal alkynes are converted to
2-halo-1-alkenes. The reagents prepared in the reaction of anhydrous HF with
organic bases and used in hydrofluorination of alkenes can add to the carbon–
carbon triple bond producing Markovnikov products.114–116,118,119 Similar
results were found with the use of DMPU [1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-
2(1H)-pyrimidinone] an inexpensive, readily available hydrogen bond acceptor
forming a stable complex with HF.161 It can act as a nucleophilic fluorinating
agent and exhibits high activity and selectivity in gold-catalyzed mono- and
difluorination of alkynes to fluoroalkenes and difluoromethylene compounds.
A process induced by [Cp∗Ru(cod)Cl] and PPh3 provides access to vinyl chlo-
rides through formal Markovnikov addition to terminal alkynes at room tem-
perature.162
However, 1-bromo-1-alkenes and 1,2-dibromoalkanes are formed when
hydrobromination is carried out in the presence of peroxides.163,164 Reactions
with reagents or reactants labeled appropriately with deuterium indicate that
the products are formed in nonselective additions.165,166 The mercury(II)-
catalyzed addition of HCl and HBr to propyne takes place with anti stereose-
lectivity.163 Catalytic anti-Markovnikov hydrobromination of terminal alkynes
with high chemo- and stereoselectivity was also accomplished by Lalic and
coworkers with the use of (IPr)CuCl (IPr = 17a), Ph2SiH2, and (BrCl2C)2 in the
presence of ortho-tert-butyl potassium phenoxide.167 The latter serves as the
turnover reagent. The key step is a highly anti-Markovnikov and syn-selective
hydrocupration followed by electrophilic bromination (Scheme 6.5). Gold
bifluoride complexes [{Au(17b)(NEt3)}(HF2)] and [{Au(17c)(NEt3)}(HF2)]
are efficient catalysts in the hydrofluorination of unsymmetrical and
(IPr)Cu−Cl
R
(IPr)Cu−H
Ph2SiH2
(IPr)Cu
R
(BrCl2C)2
Br
R
K 2-(tBu)phenoxide
toluene, 25 °C
Scheme .
10. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
symmetrical alkynes, respectively, to provide fluorinated styrene and stil-
bene derivatives (90–99% yield, 3 equiv Et3N∙3 HF, 1.5 equiv NH4BF4, rt,
5 days or 24 h).168
R
R
.. 17a R = iPr, R' = H
17b R = Ph2CH, R' = Me
17c R = (pTol)2CH, R' = Me
R R
R' R'
Dialkyl- and alkylarylacetylenes may react in a stereoselective manner yielding
anti and syn products, respectively.36,165,166,169 Hex-3-yne, for instance, gives
mainly trans-3-chlorohex-3-ene in hydrochlorination through an anti AdE3
transition state (18). In contrast, formation of (E)-1-phenyl-1-chloropropene
19, the syn product in hydrochlorination of 1-phenylpropyne in AcOH
[Eq. (6.23)], involves ion-pair intermediate 22.165 The two mechanisms com-
pete, and reaction conditions can affect selectivities. For example, stereoiso-
meric compound 20 is formed through the anti AdE3 transition state 23 in the
presence of a large amount of Me4NCl. Since the positive charge in this tran-
sition state is not stabilized by the phenyl group as in 22, an increased amount
of the regioisomeric 21 is also formed through transition state 24.
Ph Me
Cl
Ph Me
Cl
Ph
Me
Ph
Me
Cl
+ +
without Me4NCl 80% 12% 0.3%
with 1 M Me4NCl 30% 51% 10%
19 20 21
+ HCl
AcOH, 25 °C
(6.23)
C
Et
Cl
C
Et
HCl−
C
Ph
Cl
C
Me
HCl−
C
Ph
−
ClH
C
Me
Cl
C C
Me
H
Ph
+
Cl−
18 22 23 24
Surface-mediated addition of HCl, HBr, and HI to 1-phenylpropyne in the pres-
ence of silica or alumina yields initially the corresponding E-isomer as a result
of the syn addition.170 Rapid isomerization in excess reagents allows the forma-
tion of the thermodynamically more stable Z-isomers.
Mixtures of HCl and but-2-yne were reacted in the gas phase in a Pyrex IR
cell between 23 and 63 ◦C to yield only (Z)-2-chlorobut-2-ene.171 The pro-
cess is suggested to be initiated and the rate determined by surface-assisted
proton–alkyne interaction. Donation of the proton occurs from within a mul-
tilayer found on the wall, that is, from an HCl molecule not directly attached to
the wall.
Hydrogen halides may add to acetylenes in a similar way to afford alkenyl
halides.172 The use of silica and alumina, in this case, provides a simple means
for facilitating addition of hydrogen halides to alkynes that does not occur read-
ily in solution. 1-Phenylpropyne yields the corresponding syn addition product
11. 6 Addition Reactions
25, which isomerizes on extended treatment [Eq. (6.24)]. Addition of HBr or HI
to alkylacetylenes, such as oct-4-yne, in turn, affords primarily the anti addition
products. The change in mechanism may be due to the difficulty in forming an
alkyl cation lacking stabilization by the Ph substituent thereby requiring simul-
taneous nucleophilic trapping from the opposite side of the alkyne by an HX
molecule (AdE3-type addition).
(COCl)2, Al2O3
CH2Cl2, rt
Ph
Cl
Me Ph
Cl Me
+
0.3 h 85% 14%
3 h 3% 96%
25
Ph Me
(6.24)
Markovnikov addition products can be synthesized through highly-selective
hydroiodination by combining I2 with Ph2P(O)H or (PhO)2P(O)H and
Ph2P(O)OH.173 A carbon nanocomposite doped with nitrogen via treatment
with ammonia derived from silicon carbide proved to be an active and selec-
tive catalyst in transforming acetylene to vinyl chloride (80% conversion, 98%
selectivity, 200 ◦C).174 Carbon atoms bonded to pyrrolic nitrogen were shown
to be the active sites.
6.2.2 Hypohalous Acids and Hypohalites
Hypohalous acids either preformed or prepared in situ readily add to carbon–
carbon multiple bonds.175–177 The addition is an electrophilic reaction with the
positive halogen attaching itself predominantly to the less substituted carbon.
The Markovnikov rule, therefore, is followed in most cases. The addition of the
elements of hypohalous acids may be carried out by the use of reagents serving
as positive halogen sources in the presence of water. Most of the data published
concern additions to monoolefins, and very little is known about the transfor-
mations of dienes and alkynes. The addition of hypochlorous acid to alkenes
was an important industrial reaction to manufacture chlorohydrins (see Sec-
tion 6.2.4), which were then transformed to oxiranes. The so-called chloro-
hydrination process once accounted for about 50% of the U.S. production of
oxiranes has largely been replaced by direct epoxidation processes.
Limited data are available on hypofluorous acid, which is a very reactive and
an explosive reagent.178 Exceptionally among hypohalous acids, it is polarized
in the sense HOδ+–Fδ−. It converts alkenes into fluoroalkanols with regioselec-
tivities opposite to other hypohalous acids [Eq. (6.25)]. The large amount of HF
present may affect the actual mechanism of addition.
Me
OH
F
Me
HOF
CCl4, −50 °C
90%
(6.25)
12. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
Hypochlorous acid and hypobromous acid react with acyclic alkenes to give
Markovnikov products. In striking contrast, exclusive anti-Markovnikov ori-
entation was observed in the transformation of methylenecycloalkanes with
HOBr, and mixtures of chlorohydrins were formed with HOCl179 [Eq. (6.26)].
This was attributed to the fact that the open tertiary carbocation leading to
Markovnikov products are unfavorable in these ring systems. A convenient syn-
thesis of chlorohydrins is based on the use of Chloramine T (TosNClNa) as the
positive chlorine source in water–acetone.180 It adds to a variety of alkenes to
form Markovnikov and anti-Markovnikov products in a ratio of 4:1.
(CH2)n C=CH2
HOX
H2O, below 15 °C
+
n = 3−6 X = Cl 35−67% 32−64% 64−92% yield
X = Br 100% 67−87% yield
(CH2)n
CH2OX
C
OH
CH2OH
C
X
(CH2)n
(6.26)
Since the reaction of I2+H2O with alkenes is an equilibrium process, the
use of oxidizing agents allows one to shift the equilibrium by oxidizing the
I− formed.181,182 Substituted cyclohexenes can be converted to iodohydrins
in regioselective and stereoselective manner with I2 and pyridinium dichro-
mate.182 High yields of iodohydrins may be achieved by reacting alkenes with
iodine in the presence of moist tetramethylene sulfone—CHCl3.183
Alkyl and acyl hypohalites, when adding to carbon–carbon double bond,
afford halohydrin ethers and esters, respectively.184 Regioselective and syn
stereoselective addition of CF3OF, CF3CF2OF, and CF3COOF to stilbenes was
reported.185–187 The stereochemistry was explained to originate from the for-
mation and immediate collapse of the tight ion pair 26, which might exist in
equilibrium with phenonium ion 27 [Eq. (6.27)]; RF stands for perfluoroalkyl
groups].
Ph CH CH
F
Ph
+
−
ORF
F
H H
Ph
+
26 27
−ORF
(6.27)
Other alkyl hypohalites usually add to carbon–carbon multiple bonds in a free-
radical process.188–191 Ionic additions may be promoted by oxygen, BF3, or
B(OMe)3.189–193 While the BF3-catalyzed reaction of alkyl hypochlorites and
hypobromites gives mainly halofluorides,192 haloethers are formed in good
yields but nonstereoselectively under other ionic conditions.189–193 In contrast,
tert-BuOI reacts with alkenes in the presence of a catalytic amount of BF3 to
produce 2-iodoethers.194 Since the addition is stereoselective, this suggests the
participation of a symmetric iodonium ion intermediate without the involve-
ment of carbocationic intermediates.
13. 6 Addition Reactions
1,2-Halohydrin derivatives may also be formed when the cationic interme-
diates in any electrophilic halogenations are intercepted by appropriate oxygen
nucleophiles.177 In alcohol and carboxylic acid solvents, halohydrin ethers and
esters, respectively, may be formed. Such solvent incorporated products often
observed in halogenations provide valuable mechanistic information.
Halogenation with elemental halides, however, requires appropriate adjust-
ment of reaction conditions to obtain satisfactory yields and selectivities.
Chemoselectivity—the probability of the attack of different nucleophiles
(Br− vs. MeOH) present—was shown to depend on charge distribution
on the two carbon atoms in the cyclic bromonium ion intermediate.195
A study of bromination of acyclic olefins in MeOH revealed that geminal
dialkyl-substituted and trisubstituted alkenes give the best selectivities of the
2-bromomethoxy product.196 Other positive halogen sources, such as tert-
BuOX,177 [I(pyridine)2][BF4],197,198 and N-bromosuccinimide,199 may afford
better selectivities.
6.2.3 Hydrogen Cyanide
Because of its low acidity, hydrogen cyanide seldom adds to nonactivated
multiple bonds. Catalytic processes, however, may be applied to achieve
such additions. Metal catalysts, mainly nickel and palladium complexes, and
[Co(CO)4]2 are used to catalyze the addition of HCN to alkenes known as
hydrocyanation.200–206 Most studies usually utilize nickel triaryl phosphites
with a Lewis acid promoter. The mechanism involves the insertion of the alkene
into the Ni–H bond of a hydrido nickel cyanide complex to form a σ-alkylnickel
complex.205–208 The addition of DCN to deuterium-labeled compound 28
was shown to take place with dominant (>90%) syn addition207 (Scheme 6.6).
σ-Nickel complex 29 is known to be formed in a syn process. The overall
syn addition requires reductive elimination to occur with the retention of
configuration.
H D
tBu H
CN
D
H
tBu
D
H
Ni[P(OPh)3]2
D
H
tBu
D
H
CN
−Ni[P(OPh)3]2
Ni[P(OPh)3]4
ZnCl2, P(OPh)3
MeCN, 60 °C
C
tBu
H
C
D H
Ni
P(OPh)3
P(OPh)3
D
CN
+ DCN
28
29
Scheme .
14. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
Hydrocyanation of alkenes usually gives anti-Markovnikov products. Inter-
estingly, however, addition of HCN to styrene yields mostly the branched
(Markovnikov) adduct. This was suggested to result from stabilization of the
branched alkylnickel cyanide intermediate by interaction of nickel with the
aromatic ring.208 Similar branched products could be synthesized with high
enantioselectivity using [Ni(cod)2] and phosphine–phosphite ligand 30 in the
hydrocyanation of vinylarenes with TMS–CN (84–92% ee, THF, rt, 2 h).209
iPr
O
PPh2
O
P
O
O
O
Ar
Ar
Ar Ar
Ar = 3,5-Me2C6H3
30
Hydrocyanation of dienes, a process of industrial importance (see Sec-
tion 6.2.4), yields 1,4-addition products when conjugated dienes are reacted.
The addition involves η3-allyl intermediates (31) [Eq. (6.28)]. The stereochem-
istry of hydrocyanation of cyclohexa-1,3-diene was shown to occur with syn
stereoselectivity, indicating that cis migration of the cyanide anion follows the
formation of the (π-allyl)nickel complex.210
CN
D
NC D
D
Ni[P(OPh)3]4
P(OPh)3, MeCN, 60 °C
+ DCN
Ni[P(OPh)3]2
CN
+
31
1 : 1
(6.28)
Nonconjugated dienes (penta-1,4-diene, hexa-1,5-diene) are transformed
mainly to products originating from conjugated dienes formed by isomeriza-
tion.211 In contrast, octa-1,7-diene in which the double bonds are separated by
four methylene groups preventing isomerization to conjugated dienes, yields
mainly isomeric mononitriles.
HCN adds more readily to alkynes than to alkenes.212 The addition of HCN
to acetylene catalyzed by Cu+ ions was once a major industrial process to man-
ufacture acrylonitrile carried out in the presence of copper(I) chloride, NH4Cl,
and HCl213 (see Section 6.2.4). Zerovalent Ni and Pd complexes are effec-
tive catalysts in hydrocyanation of alkynes as well.201 Diphenylacetylene gives
excellent yields in producing the syn addition product214 [Eq. (6.29)]. Much
lower yields are achieved when terminal alkynes react with HCN. Terminal
nitriles formed due to mainly steric factors are the main products. Regio- and
15. 6 Addition Reactions
stereoselectivities similar to those in hydrocyanation of alkenes indicate a very
similar mechanism.
Ni[P(OPh)3]4
P(OPh)3
benzene, 120 °C 93%
toluene, ZnCl2, 60 °C 82%
+ HCN
H CN
Ph Ph
Ph Ph
(6.29)
6.2.4 Practical Applications
Ethyl Chloride Hydrochlorination of ethylene with HCl is carried out in either
the vapor or the liquid phase, in the presence of a catalyst.215–217 Ethyl chloride
or 1,2-dichloroethane containing less than 1% AlCl3 is the reaction medium in
the liquid-phase process operating under mild conditions (30–90 ◦C, 3–5 atm).
In new plants, supported AlCl3 or ZnCl2 is used in the vapor phase. Equimo-
lar amounts of the dry reagents are reacted in a fluid- or fixed-bed reactor at
elevated temperature and pressure (250–400 ◦C, 5–15 atm). Both processes
provide ethyl chloride with high (98–99%) selectivity.
A highly economical production of ethyl chloride combines radical ethane
chlorination and ethylene hydrochlorination.218,219 Called the Shell integrated
process, it uses the hydrogen chloride produced in the first reaction to carry out
the second addition step [Eq. (6.30)]. Ethyl chloride was used in the manufac-
ture of the antiknock agent tetraethyllead, which is, however, phased out.
CH3CH3 + Cl2 CH3CH2Cl + HCl CH3CH2Cl
CH2=CH2
(6.30)
Hydrochlorination of Buta-,-diene A historic process for the synthesis
of adiponitrile was the transformation of buta-1,3-diene through 1,4-
dichlorobutene.220 Addition of HCl was carried out in the vapor phase (125–
230 ◦C) in an excess of buta-1,3-diene. A mixture of isomeric dichlorobutenes
(3,4-dichlorobut-1-ene, cis- and trans-1,4-dichlorobut-2-ene) was formed.
They underwent further transformations to form the dicyanides and then,
after hydrogenation, to give adiponitrile.
Vinyl Chloride Vinyl chloride is an important monomer in the manufacture of
polyvinyl chloride and vinyl polymers. Two basic transformations are in com-
mercial use.221–223 The catalytic hydrochlorination of acetylene, once an impor-
tant industrial route is now of limited use. Because of the high-energy require-
ments of acetylene production, this process has been largely replaced by the
ethylene chlorination–oxychlorination reaction (see Section 6.3.4).
The catalytic hydrochlorination of acetylene221–223 demands high-quality
reactants. Acetylene must be free of catalyst poisons (S, P, As), and HCl must
not contain chlorine. Since water reacts with the product vinyl chloride to give
16. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
acetaldehyde and HCl, the reactants must be dry. In the more widely used
vapor-phase synthesis, the premixed reactants with a slight excess of HCl are
fed into a multitube fixed-bed reactor kept at about 200 ◦C. The catalyst is
almost invariably the superior mercury(II) chloride supported on active car-
bon. Certain additives (Ce, Th, and Cu chlorides) are used to suppress the loss
of the volatile HgCl2. High conversion (near 100%) and high selectivity (98%)
are achieved. The addition of a second molecule of HCl to vinyl chloride may
produce 1,1-dichloroethane, the only significant by-product.
Ethylene Chlorohydrin Two industrial processes were used in the synthesis of
ethylene chlorohydrin,215,224 which, in turn, was transformed to ethylene oxide.
Since the direct oxidation of ethylene to ethylene oxide is more economical,
these technologies are being abandoned.
Ethylene was reacted with chlorine water, or with a mixture of hydrated lime
and chlorine. In the latter case Ca(OCl)2 formed decomposes to yield HOCl.
The aqueous opening of the intermediate chloronium ion leads to the formation
of the product. Ethylene chlorohydrin was subsequently cyclized to ethylene
oxide by addition of calcium hydroxide.
Propylene Chlorohydrin Propylene chlorohydrin is synthesized with the aim of
producing propylene oxide. Although the latter is manufactured commercially
mainly by the direct oxidation of propylene, the chlorohydrination process is
still in limited use.
In an older version of the synthesis, propylene and chlorine react in an
aqueous solution to form propylene chlorohydrin.225–227 The slightly exother-
mic reaction maintains the 30–40 ◦C reaction temperature to yield isomeric
propylene chlorohydrins (1-chloropropan-2-ol/2-chloropropan-1-ol = 9:1).
The main by-product is 1,2-dichloropropane formed in amounts up to 10%.
The product propylene chlorohydrin then undergoes saponification to propy-
lene oxide with calcium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide.
Because of technological difficulties of this second step (large amount of
wastewater, concentration of the NaCl solution before electrolysis to produce
chlorine) a modified synthesis was developed by Lummus.228 Instead of HOCl,
tert-butyl hypochlorite generated by reacting tert-butyl alcohol and chlorine in
sodium hydroxide solution is used for the chlorohydrination step. An organic
phase containing the reagent reacts with propylene and water to produce
propylene chlorohydrin and tert-butyl alcohol. The latter is recycled to the first
stage to regenerate the reagent.
Adiponitrile Adiponitrile is an important intermediate in polyamide manufac-
ture. Hexamethylene-1,6-diamine formed by the hydrogenation of adiponitrile
is used in the production of nylon-6,6, one of the most important polyamides
in commercial production.
Among other nonaddition processes, adiponitrile may be manufactured
by the direct hydrocyanation of buta-1,3-diene (DuPont process).202,220,229 A
17. 6 Addition Reactions
CH2=CHCH=CH2
Ni0 HCN
CH3CH=CHCH2 CN
CH2=CHCHCH3
CN
32 33
CH2=CHCH2CH2 CN
HCN
CH2CH2CH2CH2
NC CN
Scheme .
homogeneous Ni(0) complex catalyzes both steps of addition of HCN to the
olefinic bonds (Scheme 6.7). The isomeric monocyanobutenes (32 and 33) are
first formed in a ratio of approximately 1:2. All subsequent steps, the isomeriza-
tion of 32 to the desired 1,4-addition product 33, a further isomerization step
(double-bond migration), and the addition of the second molecule of HCN, are
promoted by Lewis acids (ZnCl2 or SnCl2). The last step without Lewis acids is
much slower than the addition of the first molecule of HCN. Reaction temper-
atures below 150 ◦C are employed.
Acrylonitrile Acrylonitrile an important monomer in numerous polymer-
ization processes is mainly produced from propylene by ammoxidation (see
Section 9.5.3). In the traditional process, the major industrial route in the 1950s
and 1960s, an aqueous solution of copper(I) chloride, NH4Cl and HCl was
reacted with acetylene and hydrogen cyanide213,230 [Eq. (6.31)]. Coordination
of the metal ion activates the carbon–carbon triple bond toward nucleophilic
attack to yield σ-vinyl complex 34, which is a characteristic pathway of
metal-catalyzed additions to the acetylenic bond. Protolysis of 34 gives the end
product.
CH
HC
CuCl, NH4Cl, HCl
H2O, 80−90 °C
1−3 atm
+ HCN CH
HC C
Cu
H
C
CN
H
Cu+
CN−
H+
CH2=CH C N
34
(6.31)
18. 6 Addition Reactions
References
M. Liler, Reaction Mechanisms in Sulphuric Acid and Other Strong Acid
Solutions, Academic Press, London, 1971, Chapter 5, p. 167.
F. Asinger, Mono-Olefins, Chemistry and Technology, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1968, Chapter 7, p. 628.
G.H. Schmid, D.G. Garratt, in Supplement A: The Chemistry of
Double-Bonded Functional Groups, S. Patai, ed., The Chemistry of Functional
Groups, John Wiley & Sons, London, 1977, Chapter 9, p. 725.
19. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
V.J. Nowlan, T.T. Tidwell, Acc. Chem. Res., 10, 252 (1977).
F.A. Long, M.A. Paul, Chem. Rev., 57, 942 (1957).
Y. Chiang, A.J. Kresge, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 6363 (1985).
Y. Inoue, T. Ueoka, T. Kuroda, T. Hakushi, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 983
(1983).
M. Misono, N. Nojiri, Appl. Catal., 64, 1 (1990).
J. Meuldijk, G.E.H. Joosten, E.J. Stamhuis, J. Mol. Catal., 37, 75 (1986).
J. Tejero, F. Cunill, M. Iborra, J. Mol. Catal., 42, 257 (1987).
S. Randriamahefa, R. Gallo, G. Raoult, P. Mulard, J. Mol. Catal., 49, 85
(1988).
F. Fajula, R. Ibarra, F. Figueras, C. Gueguen, J. Catal., 89, 60 (1984).
M. Iwamoto, M. Tajima, S. Kagawa, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 228
(1985).
K. Eguchi, T. Tokiai, H. Arai, Appl. Catal., 34, 275 (1987).
M. Balogh, P. Laszlo, Organic Chemistry Using Clays, Springer, Berlin, 1993,
Chapter 2, p. 37.
F.J. Waller, ACS Symp. Ser., 308, 42 (1986).
G.A. Olah, Belg. Patent 889,943 (1982).
W.R. Cares, U.S. Patent 4,065,512 (1977).
J. McEwen, K. Yates, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 5800 (1987).
J.A. Marshall, Acc. Chem. Res., 2, 33 (1969).
G.J. Kavarnos, N.J. Turro, Chem. Rev., 86, 401 (1986).
R.A. Neunteufel, D.R. Arnold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 4080 (1973).
Y. Shigemitsu, D.R. Arnold, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 407 (1975).
Y. Inoue, T. Okano, N. Yamasaki, A. Tai, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 718
(1993).
K. Mizuno, I. Nakanishi, N. Ichinose, Y. Otsuji, Chem. Lett., 1095 (1989).
J.M. Adams, J.A. Ballantine, S.H. Graham, R.J. Laub, J.H. Purnell, P.I. Reid,
W.Y.M. Shaman, J.M. Thomas, J. Catal., 58, 238 (1979).
C.H. Collins, G.S. Hammond, J. Org. Chem., 25, 911 (1960).
J.K. Stille, R.D. Hughes, J. Org. Chem., 36, 340 (1971).
T.L. Jacobs, in The Chemistry of the Allenes, Vol. 2: Reactions, S.R. Landor, ed.
Academic Press, London, 1982, Chapter 5.4, p. 417.
A.V. Fedorova, A.A. Petrov, J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 32, 1740
(1962).
J.L. Jensen, V. Uaprasert, J. Org. Chem., 41, 649 (1976).
W.K. Chwang, P. Knittel, K.M. Koshy, T.T. Tidwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99,
3395 (1977).
G. Dong, P. Teo, Z.K. Wickens, R.H. Grubbs, Science, 333, 1609 (2011).
B.L. Conley, M.K. Pennington-Boggio, E. Boz, T.J. Williams, Chem. Rev., 110,
2294 (2010).
K. Takahashi, M. Yamashita, K. Nozaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 18746 (2012).
Y. Yang, J. Guo, H. Ng, Z. Chen, P. Teo, Chem. Commun., 50, 2608 (2014).
20. 6 Addition Reactions
G.H. Schmid, in The Chemistry of the Carbon-Carbon Triple Bond, S. Patai,
ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1978, Chapter 8, p. 275.
G.A. Olah, D. Meidar, Synthesis, 671 (1978).
I.K. Meier, J.A. Marsella, J. Mol. Catal., 78, 31 (1993).
Y. Fukuda, K. Utimoto, J. Org. Chem., 56, 3729 (1991).
M.M. Taqui Khan, S.B. Halligudi, S. Shukla, J. Mol. Catal., 58, 299 (1990).
(a) W. Hiscox, P.W. Jennings, Organometallics, 9, 1997 (1990). (b) J.W.
Hartman, W.C. Hiscox, P.W. Jennings, J. Org. Chem., 58, 7613 (1993).
N.X. Hu, Y. Aso, T. Otsubo, F. Ogura, Tetrahedron Lett., 27, 6099 (1986).
T. Tsuchimoto, T. Joya, E. Shirakawa, Y. Kawakami, Synlett, 1777 (2000).
Z. Nairoukh, D. Avnir, J. Blum, ChemSusChem, 6, 430 (2013).
S. Liang, G.B. Hammond, B. Xu, Chem. Commun., 51, 903 (2015).
Y. Chiang, A.J. Kresge, M. Capponi, J. Wirz, Helv. Chim. Acta, 69, 1331 (1986).
X. Liu, L. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Fu, Chem. Commun., 51, 11896 (2015).
B.C. Ranu, A. Sarkar, M. Saha, R. Chakraborty, Tetrahedron, 50, 6579 (1994).
M. Setty-Fichman, Y. Sasson, J. Blum, J. Mol. Catal., A: Chem., 126, 27 (1997).
T. Suzuki, M. Tokunaga, Y. Wakatsuki, Org. Lett., 3, 735 (2001).
L. Li, M. Zeng, S.B. Herzon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 53, 7892 (2014).
M. Zeng, L. Li, S.B. Herzon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 7058 (2014).
L. Li, S.B. Herzon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 17376 (2012).
J.A. Goodwin, A. Aponick, Chem. Commun., 51, 8730 (2015).
(a) F. Li, N. Wang, L. Lu, G. Zhu, J. Org. Chem., 80, 3538 (2015). (b) A.K. Das,
S. Park, S. Muthaiah, S.H. Hong, Synlett, 26, 2517 (2015).
S. Liang, J. Jasinski, G.B. Hammond, B. Xu, Org. Lett., 17, 162 (2015).
Y. Xu, X. Hu, S. Zhang, X. Xi, Y. Wu, ChemCatChem, 8, 262 (2016).
Y. Xu, X. Hu, J. Shao, G. Yang, Y. Wu, Z. Zhang, Green Chem., 17, 532 (2015).
E. Mizushima, K. Sato, T. Hayashi, M. Tanaka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 41,
4563 (2002).
N. Marion, R.S. Ramón, S.P. Nolan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 448 (2009).
M. Gatto, P. Belanzoni, L. Belpassi, L. Biasiolo, A. Del Zotto, F. Tarantelli,
D. Zuccaccia, ACS Catal., 6, 7363 (2016).
G. Velegraki, M. Stratakis, J. Org. Chem., 78, 8880 (2013).
W.J. Tapp, Ind. Eng. Chem., 40, 1619 (1948); 42, 1698 (1950); 44, 2020 (1952).
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010, Chapter 8, p. 198.
J.C. Fielding, in Propylene and Its Industrial Derivatives, E.G. Hancock, ed.,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1973, Chapter 6, p. 214.
P.D. Sherman, Jr., P.R. Kavasmaneck, in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology, 3rd ed., Vol. 9, M. Grayson, D. Eckroth, eds.
Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1980, p. 338.
A.E. Sommer, R. Bücker, in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design,
Vol. 19, J.J. McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds. Marcel Dekker, New York,
1983, p. 445.
21. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
M.R. Schoenberg, J.W. Blieszner, C.G. Papadopolulos, in Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed., Vol. 19, M. Grayson,
D. Eckroth, eds. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1982, p. 241.
Hydrocarbon Process., 56(11), 176 (1977).
W. Neier, J. Woellner, Hydrocarbon Process., 51(11), 113 (1972); Chemtech, 3,
95 (1973).
Hydrocarbon Process., 50(11), 172 (1971).
Y. Onoue, Y. Mizutani, S. Akiyama, Y. Izumi, Chemtech, 8, 432 (1978).
Petrol. Refiner, 38(11), 272 (1959).
Hydrocarbon Process Petrol. Refiner, 42(11), 194 (1963).
C.E. Loeffler, L. Stautzenberger, J.D. Unruh, in Encyclopedia of Chemical
Processing and Design, Vol. 5, J.J. McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds., Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1977, p. 358.
M. Prezelj, W. Koog, M. Dettmer, Hydrocarbon Proc., Int. Ed., 67(11), 75
(1988).
Hydrocarbon Process., 52(11), 141 (1973).
G. Yepsen, T. Witoshkin, Oil Gas J., 89(14), 68 (1991).
G. Parkinson, Chem Eng (N.Y.), 99(4), 35 (1992).
V.E. Pierce, A.K. Logwinuk, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 64(9), 75 (1985).
M. Prezelj, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 66(9), 68 (1987).
W.J. Piel, R.X. Thomas, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 69(7), 68 (1990).
R.W. Reynolds, J.S. Smith, I. Steinmetz, Oil Gas J., 73(24), 50 (1975).
R. Csikos, I. Pallay, J. Laky, E.D. Radcsenko, B.A. Englin, J.A. Robert,
Hydrocarbon Process., 55(7), 121 (1976).
G. Pecci, T. Floris, Hydrocarbon Process., 56(12), 98 (1977).
L.S. Bitar, E.A. Hazbun, W.J. Piel, in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and
Design, Vol. 30, J.J. McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds., Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1989, p. 82.
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010, Chapter 3, p. 71.
O.C. Abraham, G.F. Prescott, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 71(2), 51 (1992).
G.R. Muddarris, M.J. Pettman, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 59(10), 91
(1980).
L.A. Smith, M.N. Huddleston, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 61(3), 121
(1982).
L.S. Bitar, E.A. Hazbun, W.J. Piel, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 63(10), 63
(1984).
J.D. Chase, B.B. Galvez, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 60(3), 89 (1981).
J. Herwig, B. Schleppinghoff, S. Schulwitz, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed.,
63(6), 86 (1984).
H.L. Brockwell, P.R. Sarathy, R. Trotta, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 70(9),
133 (1991).
K. Rock, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 71(5), 86 (1992).
22. 6 Addition Reactions
E. Pescarollo, R. Trotta, P.R. Sarathy, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 72(2), 53
(1993).
P.M. Lange, F. Martinola, S. Oeckl, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 64(12), 51
(1985).
H.A. Wittcoff, Chemtech, 20, 48 (1990).
V. Fattore, M.M. Mauri, G. Oriani, G. Paret, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed.,
60(8), 101 (1981).
A. Convers, B. Juguin, B. Trock, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 60(3), 95
(1981).
M. Miranda, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 66(8), 51 (1987).
A. Clementi, G. Oriani, F. Ancillotti, G. Pecci, Hydrocarbon Process., 58(12),
109 (1979).
K.R. Masters, E.A. Prohaska, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 67(8), 48
(1988).
A. Aguiló, J.D. Penrod, in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design,
Vol. 1, J.J. McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1976,
p. 114.
M. Eckert, G. Fleischmann, R. Jira, H.M. Bolt, K. Golka, in Ullmann’s
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2012, Vol. 1,
191.
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010, Chapter 7, p. 168.
Petrol. Refiner, 40(11), 207 (1961).
D.F. Othmer, K. Kon, T. Igarashi, Ind. Eng. Chem., 48, 1258 (1956).
W. Li, J. Zhang, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II, P. Knochel, G.A.
Molander, eds. Vol. 4: Addition to and Substitution at C–C π-bonds, S. Ma, J.
Zhang, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014, Chapter 4.05, p. 342.
C.M. Sharts, W.A. Sheppard, Org. React. (N.Y.), 21, 125 (1974).
R.C. Larock, W.W. Leong, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, B.M. Trost,
I. Fleming, eds., Vol. 4: Additions to and Substitutions at C–C π-Bonds,
M.F. Semmelhack, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, Chapter 1.7, p. 269.
N. Yoneda, Tetrahedron, 47, 5329 (1991).
G.A. Olah, J.T. Welch, Y.D. Vankar, M. Nojima, I. Kerekes, J.A. Olah, J. Org.
Chem., 44, 3872 (1979).
G.A. Olah, M. Nojima, I. Kerekes, Synthesis, 779 (1973).
G.A. Olah, J.G. Shih, G.K.S. Prakash, in Fluorine: The First Hundred Years,
R.E. Banks, D.W.A. Sharp, J.C. Tatlow, eds., Elsevier, Lausanne, 1986,
Chapter 14, p. 377.
N. Yoneda, T. Abe, T. Fukuhara, A. Suzuki, Chem. Lett., 1135 (1983).
G.A. Olah, X.-Y. Li, Synlett, 267 (1990).
G.A. Olah, X.-Y. Li, Q. Wang, G.K.S. Prakash, Synthesis, 693 (1993).
I. Bucsi, B. Török, A.I. Marco, G. Rasul, G.K.S. Prakash, G.A. Olah, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 124, 7728 (2002).
23. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
E. Emer, L. Pfeifer, J.M. Brown, V. Gouverneur, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 53,
4181 (2014).
G.B. Sergeev, V.V. Smirnov, T.N. Rostovshchikova, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl.
Transl.), 52, 259 (1983).
M.S. Kharasch, M. Kleiman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 65, 11 (1943).
Y. Pocker, K.D. Stevens, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 4205 (1969).
J.K. Stille, F.M. Sonnenberg, T.H. Kinstle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 4922 (1966).
H.C. Brown, K.-T. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 600 (1975).
K.B. Becker, C.A. Grob, Synthesis, 789 (1973).
J.S. Dewar, R.C. Fahey, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 3, 245 (1964).
R.C. Fahey, C.A. McPherson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 3865 (1969).
Y. Pocker, R.F. Buchholz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 4033 (1970).
F.R. Mayo, J.J. Katz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 1339 (1947).
F.R. Mayo, M.G. Savoy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 1348 (1947).
R.C. Fahey, Top. Stereochem., 3, 237 (1968).
G.S. Hammond, T.D. Nevitt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 4121 (1954).
G.S. Hammond, C.H. Collins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 4323 (1960).
D.J. Pasto, G.R. Meyer, B. Lepeska, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 1858 (1974).
R.C. Fahey, M.W. Monahan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 2816 (1970).
R.C. Fahey, C.A. McPherson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 2445 (1971).
F.R. Mayo, C. Walling, Chem. Rev., 27, 351 (1940).
F.W. Stacey, J.F. Harris, Jr., Org. React. (N.Y.)., 13, 150 (1963).
M.S. Kharasch, H. Engelmann, F.R. Mayo, J. Org. Chem., 2, 288 (1937).
D.H. Hey, W.A. Waters, Chem. Rev., 21, 169 (1937).
P.I. Abell, in Free Radicals, Vol. 2, J.K. Kochi, ed., Wiley-Interscience, New
York, 1973, Chapter 13, p. 63.
D.J. Wilger, J.-M.M. Grandjean, T.R. Lammert, D.A. Nicewicz, Nat. Chem., 6,
720 (2014).
G.B. Sergeev, N.F. Stepanov, I.A. Leenson, V.V. Smirnov, V.I. Pupyshev, L.A.
Tyurina, M.N. Mashyanov, Tetrahedron, 38, 2585 (1982).
D. Landini, F. Rolla, J. Org. Chem., 45, 3527 (1980).
P.J. Kropp, K.A. Daus, M.W. Tubergen, K.D. Kepler, V.P. Wilson, S.L. Craig,
M.M. Baillargeon, G.W. Breton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 3071 (1993).
R.M. Pagni, G.W. Kabalka, R. Boothe, K. Gaetano, L.J. Stewart, R. Conaway,
C. Dial, D. Gray, S. Larson, T. Luidhardt, J. Org. Chem., 53, 4477 (1988).
L. Delaude, P. Laszlo, Tetrahedron Lett., 32, 3705 (1991).
L.J. Sæthre, T.D. Thomas, S. Svensson, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 749
(1997).
P. Boudjouk, B.-K. Kim, B.-H. Han, Synth. Commun., 26, 3479 (1996).
W. Smadja, Chem. Rev., 83, 263 (1983).
T. Okuyama, K. Izawa, T. Fueno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 6749 (1973).
R.Y. Tien, P.I. Abell, J. Org. Chem., 35, 956 (1970).
24. 6 Addition Reactions
A.V. Fedorova, A.A. Petrov, J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 31, 3273
(1961).
L.M. Mascavage, H. Chi, S. La, D.R. Dalton, J. Org. Chem., 56, 595 (1991).
L. Schmerling, J.P. West, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, 2885 (1952).
G.S. Hammond, J. Warkentin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 2554 (1961).
K. Fukui, Tetrahedron Lett., 2427 (1965).
K. Izawa, T. Okuyama, T. Sakagami, T. Fueno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 6752
(1973).
O.E. Okoromoba, J. Han, G.B. Hammond, B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136,
14381 (2014).
S. Dérien, H. Klein, C. Bruneau, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 54, 12112 (2015).
H. Hunziker, R. Meyer, Hs.H. Günthard, Helv. Chim. Acta., 49, 497 (1966).
M.S. Kharasch, J.G. McNab, M.C. McNab, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 57, 2463 (1935).
R.C. Fahey, M.T. Payne, D.-J. Lee, J. Org. Chem., 39, 1124 (1974).
F. Marcuzzi, E. Melloni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 3295 (1976).
M.R. Uehling, R.P. Rucker, G. Lalic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 8799 (2014).
F. Nahra, S.R. Patrick, D. Bello, M. Brill, A. Obled, D.B. Cordes, D.M.Z.
Slawin, D. O’Hagan, S.P. Nolan, ChemCatChem, 7, 240 (2015).
R.C. Fahey, D.J. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 5555 (1966); 90, 2124 (1968).
P.J. Kropp, K.A. Daus, S.D. Crawford, M.W. Tubergen, K.D. Kepler, S.L. Craig,
V.P. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 7433 (1990).
L.M. Mascavage, F. Zhang, D.R. Dalton, J. Org. Chem., 59, 5048 (1994).
P.J. Kropp, S.D. Crawford, J. Org. Chem., 59, 3102 (1994).
S. Kawaguchi, H. Masuno, M. Sonoda, A. Nomoto, A. Ogawa, Tetrahedron,
68, 9818 (2012).
X. Li, X. Pan, L. Yu, P. Ren, X. Wu, L. Sun, F. Jiao, X. Bao, Nat. Commun., 5,
3688 (2014).
R. Stroh, in Methoden der Organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl), Vol. 5/3:
Halogenverbindungen, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1962, p. 768.
A. Roedig, in Methoden der Organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl), Vol. 5/4:
Halogenverbindungen, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1960, p. 132, p. 540.
L.S. Boguslavskaya, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 41, 740 (1972).
K.G. Migliorese, E.H. Appelman, M.N. Tsangaris, J. Org. Chem., 44, 1711
(1979).
J.G. Traynham, O.S. Pascual, Tetrahedron, 7, 165 (1959).
B. Damin, J. Garapon, B. Sillion, Synthesis, 362 (1981).
J.W. Cornforth, D.T. Green, J. Chem. Soc. C, 846 (1970).
R. Antonioletti, M. D’Auria, A. De Mico, G. Piancatelli, A. Scettri,
Tetrahedron, 39, 1765 (1983).
R.C. Cambie, W.I. Noall, G.J. Potter, P.S. Rutledge, P.D. Woodgate, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 226 (1977).
M. Anbar, D. Ginsburg, Chem. Rev., 54, 925 (1954).
25. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
D.H.R. Barton, R.H. Hesse, G.P. Jackman, L. Ogunkoya, M.M. Pechet,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 739 (1974).
O. Lerman, S. Rozen, J. Org. Chem., 45, 4122 (1980).
S. Rozen, O. Lerman, J. Org. Chem., 45, 672 (1980).
C. Walling, L. Heaton, D.D. Tanner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 1715 (1965).
V.L. Heasley, C.L. Frye, G.E. Heasley, K.A. Martin, D.A. Redfield, P.S. Wilday,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1573 (1970).
G.E. Heasley, V.M. McCully, R.T. Wiegman, V.L. Heasley, R.A. Skidgel, J. Org.
Chem., 41, 644 (1976).
G.E. Heasley, W.E. Emery, III, R. Hinton, D.F. Shellhamer, V.L. Heasley, S.L.
Rodgers, J. Org. Chem., 43, 361 (1978).
V.L. Heasley, R.K. Gipe, J.L. Martin, H.C. Wiese, M.L. Oakes, D.F.
Shellhamer, G.E. Heasley, B.L. Robinson, J. Org. Chem., 48, 3195 (1983).
G.E. Heasley, M. Duke, D. Hoyer, J. Hunnicutt, M. Lawrence, M.J. Smolik,
V.L. Heasley, D.F. Shellhamer, Tetrahedron Lett., 23, 1459 (1982).
V.L. Heasley, B.R. Berry, S.L. Holmes, L.S. Holstein, III, K.A. Milhoan, A.M.
Sauerbrey, B.R. Teegarden, D.F. Shellhamer, G.E. Heasley, J. Org. Chem., 53,
198 (1988).
J.-E. Dubois, J.R. Chrétien, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 3506 (1978).
J.R. Chrétien, J.-D. Coudert, M.-F. Ruasse, J. Org. Chem., 58, 1917 (1993).
J. Barluenga, J.M. González, P.J. Campos, G. Asensio, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 24, 319 (1985).
J. Barluenga, J.M. González, P.J. Campos, G. Asensio, Tetrahedron Lett., 27,
1715 (1986).
R.W. Nagorski, R.S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 7773 (1992).
D.T. Mowry, Chem. Rev., 42, 189 (1948).
(a) B.R. James, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 8,
G. Wilkinson, F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982,
Chapter 51, p. 285. (b) A. Spencer, in Comprehensive Coordination
Chemistry, Vol. 6: Applications, G. Wilkinson, R.D. Gillard, J.A. McCleverty,
eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987, Chapter 61.2, p. 229. (c) L. Bini,
C. Müller, D. Vogt, ChemCatChem, 2, 590 (2010). (d) T.V. RajanBabu, Org.
React. (N.Y), 75, 1 (2011).
C.A. Tolman, R.J. McKinney, W.C. Seidel, J.D. Druliner, W.R. Stevens, Adv.
Catal., 33, 1 (1985).
J.P. Collman, L.S. Hegedus, J.R. Norton, R.G. Finke, Principles and
Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry, University Science Books,
Mill Valley, 1987, Chapter 10, p. 523.
R.J. McKinney, in Homogeneous Catalysis, G.W. Parshall, S.D. Ittel, eds.,
Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1993, Chapter 3, p. 42.
B.W. Taylor, H.E. Swift, J. Catal., 26, 254 (1972).
E.S. Brown, in Organic Syntheses via Metal Carbonyls, Vol. 2, I. Wender,
P. Pino, eds., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1977, p. 655.
26. 6 Addition Reactions
J.-E. Bäckvall, O.S. Andell, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1098 (1981).
C.A. Tolman, W.C. Seidel, J.D. Druliner, P.J. Domaille, Organometallics, 3, 33
(1984).
A. Falk, A.-L. Göderz, H.-G. Schmalz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 52, 1576
(2013).
J.-E. Bäckvall, O.S. Andell, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 260 (1984).
W. Keim, A. Behr, H.-O. Lühr, J. Weisser, J. Catal., 78, 209 (1982).
K. Friedrich, K. Wallenfels, in The Chemistry of the Cyano Group, Z.
Rappoport, ed., Interscience, London, 1970, Chapter 2, p. 67.
J.F. Brazdil, in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley
& Sons, 2010.
W.R. Jackson, C.G. Lovel, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1231 (1982).
F. Asinger, Mono-Olefins, Chemistry and Technology, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1968, Chapter 6, p. 506.
R.G. Striling, in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, Vol. 20, J.J.
McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984, p. 68.
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., VCH, Weinheim, 2010,
Chapter 8, p. 201.
A.W. Fleer, A.J. Johnson, C.R. Nelson, Ind. Eng. Chem., 47, 982 (1955).
Petrol. Refiner, 38(11), 245 (1959).
V.D. Luedeke, in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, Vol. 2,
J.J. McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1977,
p. 146.
J.S. Naworski, E.S. Velez, in Applied Industrial Catalysis, Vol. 1, B.E. Leach,
ed., Academic Press, New York, 1983, Chapter 9, p. 239.
M.W. Newman, in Encycylopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd
ed., Supplement Volume, J.I. Kroschwitz, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New
York, 1989, p. 822.
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010, Chapter 9, p. 221.
C.E. Rowe, in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, Vol. 8, J.J.
McKetta, W.A. Cunningham, eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1979, p. 160.
A.C. Fyvie, Chem. Ind. (London), 384 (1964).
A.J. Gait, in Propylene and its Industrial Derivatives, E.G. Hancock, ed. John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1973, Chapter 7, p. 273.
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010, Chapter 11, p. 275.
Hydrocarbon Process., 58(11), 239 (1979).
G.W. Parshall, J. Mol. Catal., 4, 243 (1978).
D.J. Hadley, in Propylene and Its Industrial Derivatives, E.G. Hancock, ed.,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1973, Chapter 11, p. 418.
S.T. Purrington, B.S. Kagen, T.B. Patrick, Chem. Rev., 86, 997 (1986).
S. Rozen, Acc. Chem. Res., 21, 307 (1988).
27. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
E. Block, A.L. Schwan, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, B.M. Trost, I.
Fleming, eds., Vol. 4: Additions to and Substitutions at C–C π-Bonds,
M.F. Semmelhack, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, Chapter 1.8, p. 329.
R.F. Merritt, F.A. Johnson, J. Org. Chem., 31, 1859 (1966).
F.R. Merritt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 609 (1967).
S. Rozen, M. Brand, J. Org. Chem., 51, 3607 (1986).
G.A. Olah, J.M. Bollinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 4744 (1967); 90, 947 (1968).
G.A. Olah, Y.K. Mo, Y. Halpern, J. Org. Chem., 37, 1169 (1972).
G.A. Olah, D.A. Beal, P.W. Westerman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 3387 (1973).
R. Filler, Isr. J. Chem., 17, 71 (1978).
M. Zupan, in Supplement D: The Chemistry of Halides, Pseudo-Halides, and
Azides, S. Patai, Z. Rappoport, eds.,The Chemistry of Functional Groups, John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1983, Chapter 15, p. 657.
J.A. Wilkinson, Chem. Rev., 92, 505 (1992).
A. Gregorcic, M. Zupan, J. Org. Chem., 44, 4120 (1979).
T.C. Shieh, E.D. Feit, C.L. Chernick, N.C. Yang, J. Org. Chem., 35, 4020
(1970).
M. Zupan, A. Pollak, J. Org. Chem., 42, 1559 (1977).
M.A. Tius, Tetrahedron, 51, 6605 (1995).
S.A. Lermontov, S.I. Zavorin, I.V. Bakhtin, A.N. Pushin, N.S. Zefirov, P.J.
Stang, J. Fluorine Chem., 87, 75 (1998).
S. Hara, J. Nakahigashi, K. Ishi-i, M. Sawaguchi, H. Sakai, T. Fukuhara,
N. Yoneda, Synlett, 495 (1998).
T. Kitamura, K. Muta, J. Oyamada, J. Org. Chem., 80, 10431 (2015).
K.A. V’yunov, A.I. Ginak, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 50, 151 (1981).
G.H. Schmid, in Supplement A2: The Chemistry of Double-Bonded Functional
Groups, S. Patai, ed.,The Chemistry of Functional Groups, John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd., Chichester, 1989, Chapter 11, p. 679.
K. Yates, G.H. Schmid, T.W. Regulski, D.G. Garratt, H.-W. Leung,
R. McDonald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 160 (1973).
Yu.A. Serguchev, V.P. Konyushenko, J. Org. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 11,
1339 (1975).
M.L. Poutsma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 4285 (1965).
G.B. Sergeev, Yu.A. Serguchev, V.V. Smirnov, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.),
42, 697 (1973).
G.A. Olah, Halonium Ions, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1975, Chapter 7,
p. 98.
K.W. Field, P. Kovacic, Synthesis, 135 (1969).
J.W. Strand, P. Kovacic, Synth. Commun., 2, 129 (1972).
S. Uemura, A. Onoe, M. Okano, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 47, 692 (1974).
S. Uemura, A. Onoe, M. Okano, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 47, 3121 (1974).
W.A. Nugent, Tetrahedron Lett., 3427 (1978).
T. Koyano, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 43, 3501 (1970).
28. 6 Addition Reactions
H.I. Bloemink, K. Hinds, A.C. Legon, J.C. Thorn, Chem. Commun., 1321
(1994).
I.E. Markó, P.R. Richardson, M. Bailey, A.R. Maguire, N. Coughlan,
Tetrahedron Lett., 38, 2339 (1997).
N.B. Barhate, A.S. Gajare, R.D. Wakharkar, A.V. Bedekar, Tetrahedron, 55,
11127 (1999).
A.J. Cresswell, S.T.-C. Eey, S.E. Denmark, Nat. Chem., 7, 146 (2015).
S. Fukuzumi, J.K. Kochi, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 15, 249 (1983).
J.E. Dubois, F. Garnier, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 23, 2279 (1967).
G. Bellucci, R. Bianchini, R. Ambrosetti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 2464 (1985).
R.S. Brown, R. Gedye, H. Slebocka-Tilk, J.M. Buschek, K.R. Kopecky, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 106, 4515 (1984).
G. Bellucci, C. Chiappe, F. Marioni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 515 (1987).
R.S. Brown, H. Slebocka-Tilk, A.J. Bennet, G. Bellucci, R. Bianchini,
R. Ambrosetti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 6310 (1990).
F. Garnier, R.H. Donnay, J.E. Dubois, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 829
(1971).
A. Modro, G.H. Schmid, K. Yates, J. Org. Chem., 44, 4221 (1979).
I. Roberts, G.E. Kimball, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 59, 947 (1937).
E. Bienvenue-Goëtz, J.-E. Dubois, Tetrahedron, 34, 2021 (1978).
B. Galland, E.M. Evleth, M.-F. Ruasse, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 898
(1990).
T.P. Hamilton, H.F. Schaefer, III, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 8260 (1990).
S. Yamabe, T. Minato, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 66, 3339 (1993).
G.A. Olah, A.M. White, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 5801 (1969).
G.A. Olah, T.R. Hockswender, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 3574 (1974).
G.A. Olah, P.W. Westerman, E.G. Melby, Y.K. Mo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 3565
(1974).
M.-F. Ruasse, Acc. Chem. Res., 23, 87 (1990).
F. Freeman, Chem. Rev., 75, 439 (1975).
M. Eissen, D. Lenoir, Chem. Eur. J., 14, 9830 (2008).
(a) A. Podgoršek, M. Zupan, J. Iskra, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 48, 8424 (2009).
(b) K. Yonehara, K. Kamata, K. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuno, Chem. Commun., 47,
1692 (2011).
(a) M. Karki, J. Magolan, J. Org. Chem., 80, 3701 (2015). (b) S. Song, X. Li, X.
Sun, Y. Yuan, N. Jiao, Green Chem., 17, 3285 (2015).
G.E. Heasley, J.M. Bundy, V.L. Heasley, S. Arnold, A. Gipe, D. McKee, R. Orr,
S.L. Rodgers, D.F. Shellhamer, J. Org. Chem., 43, 2793 (1978).
W.C. Baird, Jr., J.H. Surridge, M. Buza, J. Org. Chem., 36, 3324 (1971).
K. Smith, K.B. Fry, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 187 (1992).
R. Herges, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 34, 51 (1995).
S.M. Islam, R.A. Poirier, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 13218 (2007); 112, 152 (2008).
M.-F. Ruasse, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 28, 207 (1993).
29. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
L. Forlani, in The Chemistry of Functional Groups, Supplement A3: The
Chemistry of Double Bonded Functional Groups, S. Patai, ed., John Wiley &
Sons, London, 1997, Chapter 8, p. 367.
G. Bellucci, C. Chiappe, R. Bianchini, D. Lenoir, R. Herges, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
117, 12001 (1995).
R. Bianchini, C. Chiappe, D. Lenoir, P. Lemmen, R. Herges, J. Grunenburg,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 36, 1284 (1997).
G. Bellucci, R. Bianchini, C. Chiappe, D. Lenoir, A. Attar, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
117, 6243 (1995).
H. Hopf, R. Hänel, P.G. Jones, P. Bubenitschek, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
33, 1369 (1994).
A. Itoh, Y. Masaki, Synlett, 1450 (1997).
S. Yano, S. Hara, Synthesis, 47, 2839 (2015).
M.L. Poutsma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 3511 (1963).
M.L. Poutsma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 2172 (1965).
R.M. Dessau, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 1344 (1979).
P.S. Skell, R.R. Pavlis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2956 (1964).
R.L. Ayres, C.J. Michejda, E.P. Rack, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 1389 (1971).
H.G. Peer, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 81, 113 (1962).
W.H. Mueller, P.E. Butler, K. Griesbaum, J. Org. Chem., 32, 2651 (1967).
M.L. Poutsma, J. Org. Chem., 33, 4080 (1968).
W.L. Waters, W.S. Linn, M.C. Caserio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 6741 (1968).
M.C. Findlay, W.L. Waters, M.C. Caserio, J. Org. Chem., 36, 275 (1971).
L.R. Byrd, M.C. Caserio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 5758 (1971).
T. Okuyama, K. Ohashi, K. Izawa, T. Fueno, J. Org. Chem., 39, 2255 (1974).
M.L. Poutsma, J. Org. Chem., 31, 4167 (1966).
V.L. Heasley, G.E. Heasley, R.A. Loghry, M.R. McConnell, J. Org. Chem., 37,
2228 (1972).
V.L. Heasley, G.E. Heasley, S.K. Taylor, C.L. Frye, J. Org. Chem., 35, 2967
(1970).
G.E. Heasley, V.L. Heasley, S.L. Manatt, H.A. Day, R.V. Hodges, P.A. Kroon,
D.A. Redfield, T.L. Rold, D.E. Williamson, J. Org. Chem., 38, 4109 (1973).
G.E. Heasley, D.C. Hayse, G.R. McClung, D.K. Strickland, V.L. Heasley, P.D.
Davis, D.M. Ingle, K.D. Rold, T.S. Ungermann, J. Org. Chem., 41, 334 (1976).
U. Husstedt, H.J. Schäfer, Synthesis, 966 (1979).
H.J. Franz, W. Höbold, R. Höhn, G. Müller-Hagen, R. Müller, W. Pritzkow,
H. Schmidt, J. Prakt. Chem., 312, 622 (1970).
S. Uemura, S. Fukuzawa, A. Toshimitsu, M. Okano, H. Tezuka, S. Sawada,
J. Org. Chem., 48, 270 (1983).
G. Melloni, G. Modena, U. Tonellato, Acc. Chem. Res., 14, 227 (1981).
J.A. Pincock, K. Yates, Can. J. Chem., 48, 3332 (1970).
J. Xiang, R. Yuan, R. Wang, N. Yi, L. Lu, H. Zou, W. He, J. Org. Chem., 79,
11378 (2014).
30. 6 Addition Reactions
R. Bianchini, C. Chiappe, G. Lo Moro, D. Lenoir, P. Lemmen, N. Goldberg,
Chem. Eur. J., 5, 1570 (1999).
R.A. Hollins, M.P.A. Campos, J. Org. Chem., 44, 3931 (1979).
V.L. Heasley, D.F. Shellhamer, L.E. Heasley, D.B. Yaeger, G.E. Heasley, J. Org.
Chem., 45, 4649 (1980).
C. Chiappe, D. Capraro, V. Conte, D. Pieraccini, Org. Lett., 3, 1061
(2001).
R.W. McPherson, C.M. Starks, G.J. Fryar, Hydrocarbon Process., 58(3), 75
(1979).
(a) J.A. Cowfer, M.B. Gorensek, in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical
Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 2001. (b) A.C. Dimian, C.S. Bildea, Chemical
Process Design: Computer-Aided Case Studies, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008,
Chapter 7, p. 201.
D.P. Keane, R.B. Stobaugh, P.L. Townsend, Hydrocarbon Process., 52(2), 99
(1973).
L.F. Albright, Chem. Eng. (N.Y.), 74(7), 123 (1967); 74(8), 219 (1967).
W.E. Wimer, R.E. Feathers, Hydrocarbon Process., 55(3), 81 (1976).
P. Reich, Hydrocarbon Process., 55(3), 85 (1976).
R.G. Markeloff, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 63(11), 91 (1984).
C.N. Kenney, Catal. Rev., 11, 197 (1975).
J. Villadsen, H. Livbjerg, Catal. Rev., 17, 203 (1978).
E. Cavaterra, Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed., 67(12), 63 (1988).
E.W. Wong, C.P. Ambler, W.J. Baker, J.C. Parks, Jr., Hydrocarbon Process., Int.
Ed., 71(8), 129 (1992).
Hydrocarbon Process., 54(11), 217 (1975).
C.E. Hollis, Chem. Ind. (London), 1030 (1969).
(a) H.N. Sun, J.P. Wristers, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical
Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 2012, Vol. 4, p. 365. (b) M. Dahlmann,
J. Grub, E. Löser, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013.
C.A. Stewart, Jr., T. Takeshita, M.L. Coleman, in Encyclopedia of Polymer
Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, J.I. Kroschwitz, ed.,
Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1985, p. 441.
H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010, Chapter 10, p. 252.
(a) A.L. Reznichenko, K.C. Hultzsch, Org. React., 88, 1 (2015). (b) V.I. Isaeva,
L.M. Kustov, Top. Catal., 59, 1196 (2016).
Y. Takemoto, H. Miyabe, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III,
R.H. Crabtree, D.M.P. Mingos, eds., Vol. 10: Applications II: Transition Metal
Compounds in Organic Synthesis 1, I. Ojima, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007,
Chapter 10.15, p. 695.
Z. Li, D.D. Capretto, C. He, Modern Gold Catalyzed Synthesis, A.S. Hashmi,
F.D. Toste, eds., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2012, Chapter 12, p. 297, p. 309.
31. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
(a) F. Alonso, I.P. Beletskaya, M. Yus, Chem. Rev., 104, 3079 (2004). (b) G.
Evano, A.-C. Gaumont, C. Alayrac, I.E. Wrona, J.R. Giguere, O. Delacroix,
A. Bayle, K. Jouvin, C. Theunissen, J. Gatignol, A.C. Silvanus, Tetrahedron,
70, 1529 (2014).
M. Beller, J. Seayad, A. Tillack, H. Jiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 43, 3368
(2004).
M.D. Greenhalgh, A.S. Jones, S.P. Thomas, ChemCatChem, 7, 190 (2015).
(a) J.-J. Brunet, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 127, 111 (1997). (b) R. Taube, in Applied
Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Complexes, B. Cornils, W.A.
Herrmann, eds., VCH, Weinheim, 1996, Chapter 2.7, p. 507. (c) D.M.
Roundhill, Catal. Today, 37, 155 (1997). (d) T.E. Müller, M. Beller, Chem.
Rev., 98, 675 (1998).
(a) T.E. Müller, K.C. Hultzsch, M. Yus, F. Foubelo, M. Tada, Chem. Rev., 108,
3795 (2008). (b) J. Hannedouche, E. Schulz, Chem. Eur. J., 19, 4972 (2013). (c)
L. Huang, M. Arndt, K. Gooßen, H. Heydt, L.J. Gooßen, Chem. Rev., 115,
2596 (2015). (d) E. Bernoud, C. Lepori, M. Mellah, E. Schulz, J. Hannedouche,
Catal. Sci. Technol., 5, 2017 (2015).
M.B. Gasc, A. Lattes, J.J. Perie, Tetrahedron, 39, 703 (1983).
J.-J. Brunet, D. Neibecker, F. Niedercorn, J. Mol. Catal., 49, 235 (1989).
D.M. Roundhill, Chem. Rev., 92, 1 (1992).
H. Pines, W.M. Stalick, Base-Catalyzed Reactions of Hydrocarbons and
Related Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1977, Chapter 10, p. 423.
B.W. Howk, E.L. Little, S.L. Scott, G.M. Whitman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 1899
(1954).
R.D. Closson, J.P. Napolitano, G.G. Ecke, A.J. Kolka, J. Org. Chem., 22, 646
(1957).
G.P. Pez, J.E. Galle, Pure Appl. Chem., 57, 1917 (1985).
H. Lehmkuhl, D. Reinehr, J. Organomet. Chem., 55, 215 (1973).
R.J. Schlott, J.C. Falk, K.W. Narducy, J. Org. Chem., 37, 4243 (1972).
P. Horrillo-Martı́nez, K.C. Hultzsch, A. Gil, V. Branchadell, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
3311 (2007).
M. Deeba, M.E. Ford, T.A. Johnson, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 562
(1987).
M. Deeba, M.E. Ford, T.A. Johnson, in Catalysis, 1987, Studies in Surface
Science and Catalysis, Vol. 38, J.W. Ward, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988,
p. 221.
M. Deeba, M.E. Ford, J. Org. Chem., 53, 4594 (1988).
M. Tabata, N. Mizuno, M. Iwamoto, Chem. Lett., 1027 (1991).
N. Mizuno, M. Tabata, T. Uematsu, M. Iwamoto, J. Catal., 146, 249 (1994).
K.D. Hesp, M. Stradiotto, ChemCatChem, 2, 1192 (2010).
A.L. Casalnuovo, J.C. Calabrese, D. Milstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 6738
(1988).
M.G. Clerici, F. Maspero, Synthesis, 305 (1980).
32. 6 Addition Reactions
H. Schaffrath, W. Keim, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 168, 9 (2001).
R. Dorta, P. Egli, F. Zürcher, A. Togni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 10857 (1997).
I. Nakamura, H. Itagaki, Y. Yamamoto, J. Org. Soc., 63, 6458 (1998).
M. Kawatsura, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 9546 (2000).
Y. Yang, N.I. Wong, P. Teo, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1207 (2015).
T.M. Nguyen, N. Manohar, D.A. Nicewicz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 53, 6198
(2014).
M. Utsunomiya, R. Kuwano, M. Kawatsura, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
125, 5608 (2003).
M. Utsunomiya, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 2702 (2004).
J. Takaya, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 5756 (2005).
J.C. Timmerman, B.D. Robertson, R.A. Widenhoefer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
54, 2251 (2015).
S. Germain, E. Schulz, J. Hannedouche, ChemCatChem, 6, 2065 (2014).
C.S. Sevov, J. (Steve) Zhou, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 11960
(2012).
C.B. Huehls, A. Lin, J. Yang, Org. Lett., 16, 3620 (2014).
Y. Miki, K. Hirano, T. Satoh, M. Miura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 52, 10830
(2013).
X. Giner, C. Nájera, Synlett, 321 (2009).
L. Yang, L.-W. Xu, C.-G. Xia, Synthesis, 1969 (2009).
J. Gui, C.-M. Pan, Y. Jin, T. Qin, J.C. Lo, B.J. Lee, S.H. Spergel, M.E.
Mertzman, W.J. Pitts, T.E. La Cruz, M.A. Schmidt, N. Darvatkar, S.R.
Natarajan, P.S. Baran, Science, 348, 886 (2015).
S. Zhu, N. Niljianskul, S.L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 15746 (2013).
S. Zhu, S.L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 15913 (2014).
Y. Yang, S.-L. Shi, D. Niu, P. Liu, S.L. Buchwald, Science, 349, 62 (2015).
(a) K.D. Hesp, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 53, 2034 (2014). (b) Z. Sorádová,
R. Šebesta, ChemCatChem, 8, 2581 (2016).
A. Couce-Rios, A. Lledós, G. Ujaque, Chem. Eur. J., 22, 9311 (2016).
D.I. Hoke, D.L. Surbey, W.R. Oviatt, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 10, 595
(1972).
T. Fujita, K. Suga, S. Watanabe, Aust. J. Chem., 27, 531 (1974).
T. Narita, N. Imai, T. Tsuruta, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 46, 1242 (1973).
R. Baker, A.H. Cook, D.E. Halliday, T.N. Smith, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1511 (1974).
R. Baker, D.E. Halliday, Tetrahedron Lett., 2773 (1972).
K. Takahashi, A. Miyake, G. Hata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 45, 1183 (1972).
H. Trauthwein, A. Tillack, M. Beller, Chem. Commun., 2029 (1999).
D. Banerjee, K. Junge, M. Beller, Org. Chem. Front., 1, 368 (2014).
M.J. Goldfogel, C.C. Roberts, S.J. Meek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 6227 (2014).
O. Löber, M. Kawatsura, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 4366 (2001).
M.L. Cooke, K. Xu, B. Breit, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 51, 10876 (2012).
33. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
I.A. Chekulaeva, L.V. Kondrat’eva, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 34, 669
(1965).
W. Reppe, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 601, 81 (1956).
C.W. Kruse, R.F. Kleinschmidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 213 (1961).
P.W. Hickmott, Tetrahedron, 38, 1975 (1982).
M.F. Shostakovskii, G.G. Skvortsova, E.S. Domnina, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl.
Transl.), 38, 407 (1969).
C.W. Kruse, R.F. Kleinschmidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 216 (1961).
J. Barluenga, F. Aznar, R. Liz, R. Rodes, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2732
(1980); 1087 (1983).
J. Barluenga, F. Aznar, Synthesis, 195 (1977).
J. Barluenga, F. Aznar, R. Liz, M.-P. Cabal, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1375 (1985).
T. Uchimaru, Chem. Commun., 1133 (1999).
E. Haak, I. Bytschkov, S. Doye, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 38, 3389 (1999).
M. Tokunaga, M. Eckert, Y. Wakatsuki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 38, 3223
(1999).
L.-C. Lee, Y. Zhao, ACS Catal., 4, 688 (2014).
L.J. Gooßen, M. Blanchot, K.S.M. Salih, K. Gooßen, Synthesis, 2283 (2009).
L.J. Gooßen, M. Arndt, M. Blanchot, F. Rudolphi, F. Menges,
G. Niedner-Schatteburg, Adv. Synth. Catal., 350, 2701 (2008).
M. Arndt, K.S.M. Salih, A. Fromm, L.J. Goossen, F. Menges,
G. Niedner-Schatteburg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 7428 (2011).
B. Maity, L.J. Goossen, D. Koley, Chem. Sci., 6, 2532 (2015).
X. Zeng, G.D. Frey, S. Kousar, G. Bertrand, Chem. Eur. J., 15, 3056 (2009).
A. Tillack, V. Khedkar, M. Beller, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 8875 (2004).
S.-L. Shi, S.L. Buchwald, Nat. Chem., 7, 38 (2014).
Q. Sun, Y. Wang, D. Yuan, Y. Yao, Qi Shen, Chem. Commun., 51, 7633 (2015).
(a) J.B. Sweeney, Chem. Soc. Rev., 31, 247 (2002). (b) T. Katsuki, in
Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II, J.A. McCleverty, T.J. Meyer, eds.,
Elsevier, Oxford, San Diego, 2004, Vol. 9, M.D. Ward, ed. Chapter 9.4, p. 207.
M.A. Mairena, M.M. Dı́az-Requejo, T.R. Belderraı́n, M.C. Nicasio,
S. Trofimenko, P.J. Pérez, Organometallics, 23, 253 (2004).
A.C. Mayer, A.-F. Salit, C. Bolm, Chem. Commun., 5975 (2008).
D.M. Jenkins, Synlett, 23, 1267 (2012).
P. Zardi, A. Pozzoli, F. Ferretti, G. Manca, C. Meallic, E. Gallo, Dalton Trans.,
44, 10479 (2015).
Y. Liu, C.-M. Che, Chem. Eur. J., 16, 10494 (2010).
P.P. Chandrachud, H.M. Bass, D.M. Jenkins, Organometallics, 35, 1652 (2016).
A. Yoshimura, K.R. Middleton, C. Zhu, V.N. Nemykin, V.V. Zhdankin, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 51, 8059 (2012).
K. Matsuzawa, Y. Nagasawa, E. Yamaguchi, N. Tada, A. Itoh, Synthesis, 48,
2845 (2016).
34. 6 Addition Reactions
S.O. Scholz, E.P. Farney, S. Kim, D.M. Bates, T.P. Yoon, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 55, 2239 (2016).
(a) P. Müller, C. Fruit, Chem. Rev., 103, 2905 (2003). (b) H. Pellissier,
Tetrahedron, 66, 1509 (2010).
Y. Zhu, Q. Wang, R.G. Cornwall, Y. Shi, Chem. Rev., 114, 8199 (2014).
J.E. Jones, J.V. Ruppel, G.-Y. Gao, T.M. Moore, X.P. Zhang, J. Org. Chem., 73,
7260 (2008).
V. Subbarayan, J.V. Ruppel, S. Zhu, J.A. Perman, X.P. Zhang, Chem. Commun.,
4266 (2009).
C. Kim, T. Uchida, T. Katsuki, Chem. Commun., 48, 7188 (2012).
(a) J.A. Goodwin, A. Aponick, Chem. Commun., 51, 8730 (2015). (b) V.
Rodriguez-Ruiz, R. Carlino, S. Bezzenine-Lafollé, R. Gil, D. Prim, E. Schulz,
J. Hannedouche, Dalton Trans., 44, 12029 (2015).
J. Muzart, Tetrahedron, 64, 5815 (2008).
J.T. Bauer, M.S. Hadfield, A.-L. Lee, Chem. Commun., 6405 (2008).
M.S. Hadfield, A.-L. Lee, Org. Lett., 12, 484 (2010).
F. Ke, Z. Li, H. Xiang, X. Zhou, Tetrahedron Lett., 52, 318 (2011).
R.M.P. Veenboer, S. Dupuy, S.P. Nolan, ACS Catal., 5, 1330 (2015).
M. Kondo, T. Kochi, F. Kakiuchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 32 (2011).
R.H. Lam, D.B. Walker, M.H. Tucker, M.R.D. Gatus, M. Bhadbhade, B.A.
Messerle, Organometallics, 34, 4312 (2015).
(a) J. Barluenga, F. Aznar, M. Bayod, Synthesis, 144 (1988). (b) M. Bassetti,
B. Floris, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 227 (1988).
M.A. Savolainen, J. Wu, Org. Lett., 15, 3802 (2013).
M. Weı̈wer, L. Coulombel, E. Duñach, Chem. Commun., 332 (2006).
R. Kumar, Saima, A. Shard, N.H. Andhare, Richa, A.K. Sinha, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 54, 828 (2015).
S. Chun, J. Chung, J.E. Park, Y.K. Chung, ChemCatChem, 8, 2476 (2016).
A.B. Pritzius, B. Breit, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 54, 3121 (2015).
H.-L. Yue, M. Klussmann, Synlett, 27, 2505 (2016).
C.J. Weiss, S.D. Wobser, T.J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 2062 (2009).
Y. Yang, R.M. Rioux, Green Chem., 16, 3916 (2014).
A. Corma, C. González-Arellano, M. Iglesias, F. Sánchez, Appl. Catal.
A–Gen., 375, 49 (2010).
A. Di Giuseppe, R. Castarlenas, J.J. Pérez-Torrente, M. Crucianelli, V. Polo,
R. Sancho, F.J. Lahoz, L.A. Oro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 8171 (2012).
C.-G. Yang, C. He, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 6966 (2005).
C.S. Sevov, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 9303 (2013).
M.C. Haibach, C. Guan, D.Y. Wang, B. Li, N. Lease, A.M. Steffens,
K. Krogh-Jespersen, A.S. Goldman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 15062 (2013).
Y. Oonishi, A. Gómez-Suárez, A.R. Martin, S.P. Nolan, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 52, 9767 (2013).
M.R. Kuram, M. Bhanuchandra, A.K. Sahoo, J. Org. Chem., 75, 2247 (2010).
35. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
M.V. Moskalev, A.M. Yakub, A.G. Morozov, E.V. Baranov, O.V. Kazarina,
I.L. Fedushkin, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 5781 (2015).
(a) E.J. Park, J.M. Lee, H. Han, S. Chang, Org. Lett., 8, 4355 (2008). (b) Bin Li,
S. Lee, K. Shin, S. Chang, Org. Lett., 16, 2010 (2014).
I. Profir, M. Beller, I. Fleischer, Org. Biomol. Chem., 12, 6972 (2014).
A.J. Perkowski, D.A. Nicewicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 10334 (2013).
U.K. Dash, M. Bhattacharjee, J. Organomet. Chem., 700, 78 (2012).
J. Tripathy, M. Bhattacharjee, Tetrahedron Lett., 50, 4863 (2009).
S. Karabulut, B.Ö. Öztürk, Y. İmamoğlu, J. Organomet. Chem., 695, 2161
(2010).
B.C. Chary, S. Kim, Organometallics, 30, 852 (2011).
S. Dupuy, D. Gasperini, S.P. Nolan, ACS Catal., 5, 6918 (2015).
M. Nishiumi, H. Miura, K. Wada, S. Hosokawa, M. Inoue, ACS Catal., 2, 1753
(2012).
(a) O. Delacroix, A.C. Gaumont, Curr. Org. Chem., 9, 1851 (2005).
(b) D. Julienne, O. Delacroix, A.-C. Gaumont, Curr. Org. Chem., 14, 457
(2010). (c) D. S. Glueck, Top. Organomet. Chem., 31, 65 (2010). (d) V. Koshti,
S. Gaikwad, S.H. Chikkali, Coord. Chem. Rev., 265, 52 (2014).
L. Rosenberg, ACS Catal., 3, 2845 (2013).
J. Yuan, H. Hu, C. Cu, Chem. Eur. J., 22, 5778 (2016).
M.B. Ghebreab, C.A. Bange, R. Waterman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 9240
(2014).
C.A. Bange, R. Waterman, ACS Catal., 6, 6413 (2016).
M. Kamitani, M. Itazaki, C. Tamiya, H. Nakazawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134,
11932 (2012).
M.A. Kazankova, I.V. Efimova, A.N. Kochetkov, V.V. Afanas’ev, I.P.
Beletskaya, P.H. Dixneuf, Synlett, 497 (2001).
M. Hayashi, Y. Matsuura, Y. Watanabe, J. Org. Chem., 71, 9248 (2006).
S. Kawaguchi, S. Nagata, A. Nomoto, M. Sonoda, Akiya Ogawa, J. Org. Chem.,
73, 7928 (2008).
U.M. Dzhemilev, A.G. Ibragimo, in Modern Reduction Methods, P.G.
Andersson, I.J. Munslow, eds., Wiley-VCH, Wienheim, 2008, Chapter 18,
p. 447.
Main Group Metals in Organic Synthesis, H. Yamamoto, K. Oshima, eds.,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004.
S. Bhaduri, D. Mukesh, Homogeneous Catalysis: Mechanisms and Industrial
Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2014,
Chapter 5, p. 131.
G. Zweifel, H.C. Brown, Org. React. (N.Y.), 13, 1 (1963).
G.M.L. Cragg, Organoboranes in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1973.
M.K. Whittlesey, in Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II,
J.A. McCleverty, T.J. Meyer, eds. Elsevier, Oxford, San Diego, 2004, Vol. 9,
M.D. Ward, ed., Chapter 9.5, p. 265.
36. 6 Addition Reactions
H.C. Brown, G.W. Kramer, A.B. Levy, M.M. Midland, Organic Syntheses via
Boranes, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1975.
B.M. Mikhailov, Yu.N. Bubnov, Organoboron Compounds in Organic
Synthesis, Harwood, Chur, 1984.
D.S. Matteson, in The Chemistry of the Metal-Carbon Bond, Vol. 4, F.R.
Hartley, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1987, Chapter 3, p. 307.
K. Avasthi, D. Devaprabhakara, A. Suzuki, in Organometallic Chemistry
Reviews, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry Library 7, D. Seyferth, A.G.
Davies, E.O. Fischer, J.F. Normant, O.A. Reutov, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam,
1979, p. 1.
J. Weill-Raynal, Synthesis, 633 (1976).
A. Pelter, Chem. Soc. Rev., 11, 191 (1982).
H.C. Brown, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 7, G.
Wilkinson, F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982,
Chapter 45.1, p. 111.
A. Suzuki, R.S. Dhillon, Top. Curr. Chem., 130, 23 (1986).
H.C. Brown, Hydroboration, Benjamin, New York, 1962.
(a) A. Pelter, K. Smith, in Comprehensive Organic Chemistry, Vol. 3, D.H.R.
Barton, W.D. Ollis, eds., Pergamon, Oxford, 1979, Chapter 14.2, p. 695. (b) E.
Negishi, Organometallics in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 1, Wiley-Interscience,
New York, 1980, Chapter 5, p. 287. (c) P.J. Guiry, A.G. Coyne, A.-M. Carroll,
in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III, R.H. Crabtree, D.M.P.
Mingos eds., Vol. 10: Applications II: Transition Metal Compounds in
Organic Synthesis 1, I. Ojima, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007, Chapter 10.19,
p. 839. (d) E.C. Neeve, S.J. Geier, I.A.I. Mkhalid, S.A. Westcott, T.B. Marder,
Chem. Rev., 116, 9091 (2016).
M. Zaidlewicz, A. Wolan, M. Budny, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II,
P. Knochel, G.A. Molander, eds., Vol. 8: Reduction, J. Clayden, ed., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 2014, Chapter 8.24, p. 877.
H.C. Brown, B.C. Subba Rao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 78, 5694 (1956); J. Org.
Chem., 22, 1136 (1957).
M. Zaidlewich, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 7,
G. Wilkinson, F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982,
Chapter 45.3, p. 161.
L.M. Braun, R.A. Braun, H.R. Crissman, M. Opperman, R.M. Adams, J. Org.
Chem., 36, 2388 (1971).
H.C. Brown, A.K. Mandal, S.U. Kulkarni, J. Org. Chem., 42, 1392 (1977).
H.C. Brown, G. Zweifel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 1241 (1961).
H.C. Brown, A.W. Moerikofer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 1478 (1962).
E. Negishi, H.C. Brown, Synthesis, 77 (1974).
J.E. Rice, Y. Okamoto, J. Org. Chem., 47, 4189 (1982).
H.C. Brown, E.F. Knights, C.G. Scouten, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 7765
(1974).
H.C. Brown, E. Negishi, J.-J. Katz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 2791 (1975).
37. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
H.C. Brown, J.-J. Katz, C.F. Lane, E. Negishi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 2799
(1975).
A. Pelter, D.J. Ryder, J.H. Sheppard, Tetrahedron Lett., 4715 (1978).
J.A. Sikorski, H.C. Brown, J. Org. Chem., 47, 872 (1982).
H.C. Brown, G. Zweifel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 2544 (1961).
G. Zweifel, H.C. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 393 (1964).
G.W. Kabalka, R.J. Newton, Jr., J. Jacobus, J. Org. Chem., 43, 1567 (1978).
H.C. Brown, J.H. Kawakami, K.-T. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 2209 (1973).
H.C. Brown, G. Zweifel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 4708 (1960).
H.C. Brown, J. Chandrasekharan, K.K. Wang, Pure Appl. Chem., 55, 1387
(1983).
R.E. Williams, Inorg. Chem., 1, 971 (1962).
G.A. Olah, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 12, 173 (1973).
H.C. Brown, A.W. Moerikofer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 3417 (1961).
H.C. Brown, C.G. Scouten, K.K. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 44, 2589 (1979).
C.F. Lane, G.W. Kabalka, Tetrahedron, 32, 981 (1976).
D. Männig, H. Nöth, Angew. Chem., Intl. Ed. Engl., 24, 878 (1985).
K. Burgess, M.J. Ohlmeyer, Chem. Rev., 91, 1179 (1991).
D.A. Evans, G.C. Fu, A.H. Hoveyda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 6671 (1992).
D.A. Evans, G.C. Fu, B.A. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 6679 (1992).
T. Hayashi, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Ito, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2, 601 (1991).
J.V.B. Kanth, H.C. Brown, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 9361 (2000).
J.F. Hartwig, C.N. Muhoro, Organometallics, 19, 30 (2000).
L. Zhang, Z. Zuo, X. Leng, Z. Huang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 53, 2696
(2014).
J.V. Obligacion, P.J. Chirik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 19107 (2013).
Y. Wen, J. Xie, C. Deng, C. Li, J. Org. Chem., 80, 4142 (2015).
(a) J.V. Obligacion, P.J. Chirik, Org. Lett., 15, 2680 (2013). (b) M.D.
Greenhalgh, S.P. Thomas, Chem. Commun., 49, 11230 (2013). (c) K.-N.T.
Tseng, J.W. Kampf, N.K. Szymczak, ACS Catal., 5, 411 (2015).
L. Zhang, Z. Huang, Synlett, 24, 1745 (2013).
L. Zhang, D. Peng, X. Leng, Z. Huang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 52, 3676 (2013).
H.C. Brown, P.V. Ramachandran, J. Organomet. Chem., 500, 1 (1995).
A.M. Segarra, R. Guerrero, C. Claver, E. Fernandez, Chem. Commun., 1808
(2001).
J. Chen, T. Xi, Z. Lu, Org. Lett., 16, 6452 (2014).
L. Zhang, Z. Zuo, X. Wan, Z. Huang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 15501 (2014).
H. Zhang, Z. Lu, ACS Catal., 6, 6596 (2016).
A.J. MacNair, C.R.P. Millet, G.S. Nichol, A. Ironmonger, S.P. Thomas, ACS
Catal., 6, 7217 (2016).
X. Jia, Z. Huang, Nat. Chem., 8, 157 (2016).
G. Zweifel, K. Nagase, H.C. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 183 (1962).
H.C. Brown, E. Negishi, S.K. Gupta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 2460 (1970).
38. 6 Addition Reactions
H.C. Brown, E. Negishi, P.L. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 3400 (1971).
H.C. Brown, R. Liotta, G.W. Kramer, J. Org. Chem., 43, 1058 (1978).
H.C. Brown, E. Negishi, Tetrahedron, 33, 2331 (1977).
E.F. Knights, H.C. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 5280 (1968).
J.A. Soderquist, H.C. Brown, J. Org. Chem., 46, 4599 (1981).
J.Y. Wu, B. Moreau, T. Ritter, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 12915 (2009).
Y. Cao, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Leng, Z. Huang, Org. Chem. Front.,
1, 1101 (2014).
R.J. Ely, J.P. Morken, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 2534 (2010).
K. Semba, M. Shinomiya, T. Fujihara, J. Terao, Y. Tsuji, Chem. Eur. J., 19, 7125
(2013).
H.C. Brown, G. Zweifel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 3834 (1961).
G. Zweifel, H. Arzoumanian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 291 (1967).
(a) B.M. Trost, Z.T. Ball, Synthesis, 853 (2005). (b) R. Barbeyron, E. Benedetti,
J. Cossy, J.-J. Vasseur, S. Arseniyadis, M. Smietana, Tetrahedron, 70, 8431
(2014). (c) H. Yoshida, ACS Catal., 6, 1799 (2016).
G. Zweifel, G.M. Clark, N.L. Polston, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 3395 (1971).
H.C. Brown, C.G. Scouten, R. Liotta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 96 (1979).
H.C. Brown, D. Basavaiah, S.U. Kulkarni, J. Organomet. Chem., 225, 63
(1982).
J.S. Cha, S.J. Min, J.M. Kim, O.O. Kwon Tetrahedron Lett., 34, 5113 (1993).
W.G. Woods, P.L. Strong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 4667 (1966).
H.C. Brown, S.K. Gupta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 5249 (1975).
A. Pelter, S. Singaram, H. Brown, Tetrahedron Lett., 24, 1433 (1983).
T. Ohmura, Y. Yamamoto, N. Miyaura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 4990
(2000).
J.J.J. Juliette, I.T. Horváth, J.A. Gladysz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 36, 1610
(1997).
A. Grirrane, A. Corma, H. Garcia, Chem. Eur. J., 17, 2467 (2011).
C. Gunanathan, M. Hölscher, F. Pan, W. Leitner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134,
14349 (2012).
J.V. Obligacion, J.M. Neely, A.N. Yazdani, I. Pappas, P.J. Chirik, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 137, 5855 (2015).
B. Sundararaju, A. Fürstner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 52, 14050 (2013).
H. Reinheckel, K. Haage, D. Jahnke, Organometal. Chem. Rev., Sect. A., 4, 47
(1969).
G. Zweifel, J.A. Miller, Org. React. (N.Y.), 32, 375 (1984).
P.A. Chaloner, in The Chemistry of the Metal-Carbon Bond, Vol. 4, F.R.
Hartley, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1987, Chapter 4, p. 411.
K. Maruoka, H. Yamamoto, Tetrahedron, 44, 5001 (1988).
(a) U.M. Dzhemilev, O.S. Vostrikova, G.A. Tolstikov, J. Organomet. Chem.,
304, 17 (1986). (b) U.M. Dzhemilev, V.A. D’yakonov, Top. Organomet. Chem.,
41, 215 (2013).
39. Hydrocarbon Chemistry
J.J. Eisch, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, B.M. Trost, I. Fleming, eds.,
Vol. 8: Reduction, I. Fleming, ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, Chapter 3.11,
p. 733.
K. Ziegler, H.-G. Gellert, H. Lehmkuhl, W. Pfohl, K. Zosel, Justus Liebigs Ann.
Chem., 629, 1 (1960).
K. Ziegler, H.-G. Gellert, H. Martin, K. Nagel, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 589,
91 (1954).
K. Ziegler, Angew. Chem., 64, 323 (1952).
K. Ziegler, H. Martin, F. Krupp, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 629, 14 (1960).
G. Natta, P. Pino, G. Mazzanti, P. Longi, F. Bernardini, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81,
2561 (1959).
F. Sato, S. Sato, M. Sato, J. Organomet. Chem., 131, C26 (1977).
G. Wilke, H. Müller, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 618, 267 (1958); 629, 222
(1960).
J.J. Eisch, W.C. Kaska, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 2213 (1966).
G. Zweifel, R.B. Steele, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 5085 (1967).
E.F. Magoon, L.H. Slaugh, Tetrahedron, 23, 4509 (1967).
E. Negishi, D.Y. Kondakov, Chem. Soc. Rev., 25, 417 (1996).
U.M. Dzhemilev, A.G. Ibragimov, Russ. Chem. Rev., 69, 121 (2000).
F. Gao, A.H. Hoveyda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 10961 (2011).
(a) R.N. Meals, Pure Appl. Chem., 13, 141 (1966). (b) E. Lukevics, Z.V.
Belyakova, M.G. Pomerantseva, M.G. Voronkov, in Organometallic
Chemistry Reviews, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry Library 5, D.
Seyferth, A.G. Davies, E.O. Fischer, J.F. Normant, O.A. Reutov, eds., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1977, p. 1. (c) K.A. Andrianov, J. Soucek, L.M. Khananashvili,
Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 48, 657 (1979). (d) E. Negishi,
Organometallics in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 1, Wiley-Interscience, New York,
1980, Chapter 6, p. 394. (e) I. Ojima, in The Chemistry of Organic Silicon
Compounds, S. Patai, Z. Rappoport, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.,
Chichester, 1989, Chapter 25, p. 1479. (f) Z.T. Ball, in Comprehensive
Organometallic Chemistry III, R.H. Crabtree, D.M.P. Mingos eds., Vol. 10:
Applications II: Transition Metal Compounds in Organic Synthesis 1, I.
Ojima, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007, Chapter 10.17, p. 789. (g) P.A. Mayes,
P. Perlmutter, in Modern Reduction Methods, P.G. Andersson, I.J. Munslow,
eds., Wiley-VCH, Wienheim, 2008, Chapter 4, p. 87.
J.F. Harrod, A.J. Chalk, in Organic Syntheses via Metal Carbonyls, Vol. 2,
I. Wender, P. Pino, eds., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1977, p. 673.
J.L. Speier, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 17, 407 (1979).
F.H. Jardine, in The Chemistry of the Metal-Carbon Bond, Vol. 4, F.R. Hartley,
ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1987, Chapter 8, p. 784.
A.P. Dobbs, F.K.I. Chio, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II, P. Knochel,
G.A. Molander, eds., Vol. 8: Reduction, J. Clayden, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam,
2014, Chapter 8.25, p. 964.
40. 6 Addition Reactions
P.A. Chaloner, Handbook of Coordination Catalysis in Organic Chemistry,
Butterworths, London, 1986, Chapter 4, p. 307.
(a) B. Hardman, A. Torkelson, in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and
Engineering, 2nd ed., Vol. 15, J.I. Kroschwitz, ed., Wiley-Interscience, New
York, 1989, p. 204. (b) D. Troegel, J. Stohrer, Coord. Chem. Rev., 255, 1440
(2011).
A.J. Chalk, J.F. Harrod, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 16 (1965).
J.F. Harrod, A.J. Chalk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 1133 (1965); 88, 3491 (1966).
L.H. Sommer, J.E. Lyons, H. Fujimoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 7051 (1969).
M.A. Schroeder, M.S. Wrighton, J. Organomet. Chem., 128, 345 (1977).
A. Millan, M.-J. Fernandez, P. Bentz, P.M. Maitlis, J. Mol. Catal., 26, 89
(1984).
A. Onopchenko, E.T. Sabourin, D.L. Beach, J. Org. Chem., 48, 5101 (1983).
M. Bookhart, B.E. Grant, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 2151 (1993).
M.G. Voronkov, V.B. Pukhnarevich, S.P. Sushchinskaya, L.I. Kopylova, B.A.
Trofimov, J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 41, 2120 (1971).
R.A. Benkeser, J. Kang, J. Organomet. Chem., 185, C9 (1980).
A. Onopchenko, E.T. Sabourin, J. Org. Chem., 52, 4118 (1987).
L.N. Lewis, R.J. Uriarte, Organometallics, 9, 621 (1990).
L.N. Lewis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 5998 (1990).
L.N. Lewis, N. Lewis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 108, 7228 (1986).
L.N. Lewis, R.J. Uriarte, N. Lewis, J. Mol. Catal., 66, 105 (1991).
I. Ojima, K. Yamamoto, M. Kumada, in Aspects of Homogeneous Catalysis,
Vol. 3, R. Ugo, ed., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977, Chapter 3, p. 185.
J.L. Speier, J.A. Webster, G.H. Barnes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 974 (1957).
T.G. Selin, R. West, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 1863 (1962).
H.M. Bank, J.C. Saam, J.L. Speier, J. Org. Chem., 29, 792 (1964).
R.A. Benkeser, S. Dunny, G.S. Li, P.G. Nerlekar, S.D. Work, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
90, 1871 (1968).
R.N. Haszeldine, R.V. Parish, R.J. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2311
(1974).
T.G. Selin, R. West, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 1860 (1962).
M. Čapka, P. Svoboda, J. Hetflejš, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 38, 3830
(1973).
E.W. Bennett, P.J. Orenski, J. Organomet. Chem., 28, 137 (1971).
K. Oertle, H. Wetter, Tetrahedron Lett., 26, 5511 (1985).
B. Marciniec, Comprehensive Handbook on Hydrosilylation, Pergamon,
Oxford, 1992, Chapter 2; Coord. Chem. Rev., 249, 2374 (2005).
M.A. Brook, Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, Polymer Chemistry, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000, p. 401.
B. Marciniec, in Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic
Complexes, B. Cornils, W.A. Herrmann, eds., VCH, Weinheim, 1996,
Chapter 2.6, p. 487.