S U M M A R Y              O F       R E V I S I O N S




Summary of Revisions for the 2010
Clinical Practice Recommendations

                                                                                                              ●


B
      eginning with the 2005 supple-                   Revisions to the “Standards of                             The section “Diabetes self-management
      ment, the Clinical Practice Recom-               Medical Care in Diabetes”                                  education” has been extensively revised
      mendations contained only the                    In addition to many small changes related                  to reflect new evidence.
“Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes”                to new evidence since the previous ver-                ●   The section “Antiplatelet agents” has
and selected other position statements.                sion, the following sections have under-                   been extensively revised to reflect re-
This change was made to emphasize the                  gone major changes:                                        cent trials questioning the benefit of as-
importance of the “Standards” as the best                                                                         pirin for primary cardiovascular disease
source to determine American Diabetes                  ●   The section “Diagnosis of diabetes” has                prevention in moderate- or low-risk
Association recommendations. The posi-                     been revised to include the use of A1C                 patients. The recommendation has
tion statements in the supplement are up-                  to diagnose diabetes, with a cut point of              changed to consider aspirin therapy as
dated yearly. Position statements not                        6.5%.                                                a primary prevention strategy in those
included in the supplement will be up-                 ●   The section previously titled “Diagnosis               with diabetes at increased cardiovascu-
dated as necessary and republished when                    of pre-diabetes” has been renamed
                                                                                                                  lar risk (10-year risk 10%). This in-
updated. A list of the position statements                 “Categories of increased risk for diabe-
                                                                                                                  cludes men 50 years of age or women
not included in this supplement appears                    tes.” In addition to impaired fasting glu-
on p. S100.                                                cose and impaired glucose tolerance, an                  60 years of age with at least one ad-
                                                           A1C range of 5.7– 6.4% has been in-                    ditional major risk factor.
                                                                                                              ●   The section “Retinopathy screening
                                                           cluded as a category of increased risk
Additions to the “Standards of                             for future diabetes.                                   and treatment” has been updated to
Medical Care in Diabetes”                              ●   The section “Detection and diagnosis of                include a recommendation on use of
                                                           GDM” has been revised to discuss po-                   fundus photography as a screening
●   A section on cystic fibrosis–related dia-               tential future changes in the diagnosis                strategy.
    betes has been added.                                  based on international consensus.                  ●   The section “Diabetes care in the hospi-
                                                                                                                  tal” has been extensively revised to re-
                                                                                                                  flect new evidence calling into question
                                                                                                                  very tight glycemic control goals in crit-
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
                                                                                                                  ically ill patients.
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-S003                                                                                        ●
© 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly
                                                                                                                  The section “Strategies for improving
  cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.       diabetes care” has been extensively re-
  org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.                                                                         vised to reflect newer evidence.




care.diabetesjournals.org                                                                     DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 33, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2010       S3

Ada diabetes revisions_2010

  • 1.
    S U MM A R Y O F R E V I S I O N S Summary of Revisions for the 2010 Clinical Practice Recommendations ● B eginning with the 2005 supple- Revisions to the “Standards of The section “Diabetes self-management ment, the Clinical Practice Recom- Medical Care in Diabetes” education” has been extensively revised mendations contained only the In addition to many small changes related to reflect new evidence. “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” to new evidence since the previous ver- ● The section “Antiplatelet agents” has and selected other position statements. sion, the following sections have under- been extensively revised to reflect re- This change was made to emphasize the gone major changes: cent trials questioning the benefit of as- importance of the “Standards” as the best pirin for primary cardiovascular disease source to determine American Diabetes ● The section “Diagnosis of diabetes” has prevention in moderate- or low-risk Association recommendations. The posi- been revised to include the use of A1C patients. The recommendation has tion statements in the supplement are up- to diagnose diabetes, with a cut point of changed to consider aspirin therapy as dated yearly. Position statements not 6.5%. a primary prevention strategy in those included in the supplement will be up- ● The section previously titled “Diagnosis with diabetes at increased cardiovascu- dated as necessary and republished when of pre-diabetes” has been renamed lar risk (10-year risk 10%). This in- updated. A list of the position statements “Categories of increased risk for diabe- cludes men 50 years of age or women not included in this supplement appears tes.” In addition to impaired fasting glu- on p. S100. cose and impaired glucose tolerance, an 60 years of age with at least one ad- A1C range of 5.7– 6.4% has been in- ditional major risk factor. ● The section “Retinopathy screening cluded as a category of increased risk Additions to the “Standards of for future diabetes. and treatment” has been updated to Medical Care in Diabetes” ● The section “Detection and diagnosis of include a recommendation on use of GDM” has been revised to discuss po- fundus photography as a screening ● A section on cystic fibrosis–related dia- tential future changes in the diagnosis strategy. betes has been added. based on international consensus. ● The section “Diabetes care in the hospi- tal” has been extensively revised to re- flect new evidence calling into question very tight glycemic control goals in crit- ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ically ill patients. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-S003 ● © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly The section “Strategies for improving cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons. diabetes care” has been extensively re- org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. vised to reflect newer evidence. care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 33, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2010 S3