This document summarizes research on the relationship between homework and test scores. It discusses how the research question guides a qualitative or quantitative study. A hypothetical quantitative study is proposed to compare test scores of students who do and do not complete homework. The study would use a group comparison design and control for factors like student characteristics and instruction. A qualitative study is also proposed to examine how homework may impact student interest and effort. The document also covers qualitative research methods, interview guides, and ensuring quality data collection.
Delivered by Cleo Jones of Edinburgh City Council at the Annual Conference of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals in Scotland (CILIPS), which took place 1-3 June 2009.
El Aprendizaje en Pares y Proyecto (PPL) es un modelo interactivo de aprendizaje centrado en el estudiante, que puede ser fácilmente adoptado por cualquier instructor que quiera cambiar su rol clásico de entregar información a sus estudiantes, a un modelo donde su rol principal es administrar un conjunto completo de instrucciones. PPL se diseña para cumplir los objetivos de STEM y está constituido de dos partes fundamentales; de aprendizaje en pares en el aula y de aprendizaje basado en proyecto en el laboratorio. En PPL, los estudiantes toman un papel activo para construir su conocimiento científico, los que van desde la Lectura Previa a la Clase, Preguntas Conceptuales en la Instrucción en Pares, Trabajo en equipo para la solución de Problemas, Desarrollo y Presentación del Proyecto.
Peer Project Learning (PPL)
Is an interactive student-centered curriculum, which can be easily adopted by any instructors who want to change their roles from delivering information to managing a complete set of instructions. PPL is designed to meet the goals of STEM, and consists of Peer Learning in the classroom and Project Learning in the lab. In PPL, students take an active role to build up their scientific knowledge through the pre-class reading, conceptual questions in Peer Instruction, team problem solving, development and presentation of project.
Delivered by Cleo Jones of Edinburgh City Council at the Annual Conference of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals in Scotland (CILIPS), which took place 1-3 June 2009.
El Aprendizaje en Pares y Proyecto (PPL) es un modelo interactivo de aprendizaje centrado en el estudiante, que puede ser fácilmente adoptado por cualquier instructor que quiera cambiar su rol clásico de entregar información a sus estudiantes, a un modelo donde su rol principal es administrar un conjunto completo de instrucciones. PPL se diseña para cumplir los objetivos de STEM y está constituido de dos partes fundamentales; de aprendizaje en pares en el aula y de aprendizaje basado en proyecto en el laboratorio. En PPL, los estudiantes toman un papel activo para construir su conocimiento científico, los que van desde la Lectura Previa a la Clase, Preguntas Conceptuales en la Instrucción en Pares, Trabajo en equipo para la solución de Problemas, Desarrollo y Presentación del Proyecto.
Peer Project Learning (PPL)
Is an interactive student-centered curriculum, which can be easily adopted by any instructors who want to change their roles from delivering information to managing a complete set of instructions. PPL is designed to meet the goals of STEM, and consists of Peer Learning in the classroom and Project Learning in the lab. In PPL, students take an active role to build up their scientific knowledge through the pre-class reading, conceptual questions in Peer Instruction, team problem solving, development and presentation of project.
Evaluating an Instructional Sequence with Interactive Simulations (ISIS)David Geelan
A novel sequence for teaching students physics concepts and inquiry skills was developed and evaluated. It was found to enhance students' conceptual understanding, confidence in their understanding and skills in inquiry learning
What will they need? Pre-assessment techniques for instruction session.gwenexner
Librarians all know the importance of a reference interview -- it's to make sure you're addressing what the patron actually needs. Classes take longer, and involve more people, but the fact still holds: to give the best service, you need to assess what the needs actually are.
An additional benefit of pre-assessment is that it can provide evidence of the impact of the teaching program, both to university administration and to accreditation organizations.
Presented by Gwen Exner at "Assessment Beyond Statistics" NCLA College & Universities Section/Community & Junior Colleges Section 2012 conference.
Stephen Phillips - Implementing an inquiry based approach into our schoolSails-project
Presented at the SMEC & SAILS Conference “Thinking Assessment in Science & Mathematics” which was held on 24-25 June 2014 in the Dublin City University in Ireland.
Poster: Implementing an inquiry based approach into our school
We approached the use of inquiry in our school from two different perspectives: 1) How should we go about teaching inquiry at Wilson’s School? What topics shall we pilot teaching at Wilson’s teaching? What are the challenges faced by the teacher and by students? 2) What happens when we raise students’ self-awareness of their communication skills, using inquiry tasks? How will the staff and students feel towards inquiry-based lessons? Will they enjoy them? Will they trust them? Will they see the value in them and their relevance to the real world?
1. Lauren Nourse
710 Week 2 Benicia
February 18, 2010
Chapter 4
1. Relationship between a research topic, a research question, and a set of hypotheses?
Quantitative research approaches may be guided by either research questions or hypotheses
whereas qualitative research approaches are directed only by research questions.
The research question is the fundamental question inherent in the research topic under
investigation. It guides the research study. The research question is often just the research
topic reformed into a question.
Hypotheses offer speculative answers but guiding research questions do not. Hypotheses are
educated guesses about the findings of a study made before the study begins. They make
predictions about the outcome of the study and often are not useful in qualitative studies .
2. Does homework translate into higher test scores?
a. null hypothesis: There will be no difference in student scores on chapter finals between
those students who completed assigned homework and those students not assigned
homework.
b. nondirectional research hypotheses: There will be a difference in the results of student
scores on chapter finals between students who are assigned and complete homework and
those not assigned homework.
c. directional research hypothesis: Students who are assigned and complete homework
assignments will achieve higher scores on chapter finals
3. Qualitative Case Study: Can virtual computer labs provide the same level of learning as hands-on
labs?
Quantitative Investigation: Is student understanding of a science concept better understood and
retained if the student investigates the topic through a virtual computer based lab or in a classroom
laboratory?
While the questions are basically the same the research outcomes could appear markedly different.
A qualitative case study might produce a research outcome withe a more holistic result such as
increased student interest and attention in class as measured by reduced number of disciplinary actions
needed. Science might be perceived as more “fun” and therefore more worthy of their time and effort.
The quantitative study results would be based on actual test score data.
4. Correlational research
a. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_study_finds_correlation_between_social_me
dia_and_financial_success.php
This article claims that brands most engaged in social media are also experiencing higher
financial success rates than those of their non-engaged peers. While this article gives
credibility to its premise through several charts and graphs, it also states that “Whether this
correlation is actually a causation cannot be proven with the data on hand, it can only make the
implication.”
2. It is often the case that the results of the research are summarized in the heading and little else
of substance is provided as backup to the statement. This seems most often the case with pop-
culture topics. The article cited seems like a misrepresentation as it uses its charts and graphs
to support its premise but buried within the article does admit that this information can only
make the implication.
5. Research design for: Does homework translate into higher test scores?
A. Group comparison design:
Cause: homework
Effect: higher test scores
• Anticipated Research Design: Qualitative Constant Comparative Method:
• Data is collected on test scores as compared to student homework turn in rate
• Observation is made that test scores might be effected by level of homework
completed
• Once observation is made focus on types of homework being given. For example:
rates of turn in for routine weekly workpage assignments versus rates of turn in
for larger project based assignments.
• Begin analyzing factors such as number of student absences, number of school
holidays interrupting a routine school schedule, day of week tests are given,
length of test, type of test.
• Begin to analyze student data such as reading competencies, grade level
readiness.
• Analyze data collected and form new hypothesis based on results.
B. Research design for: Can virtual computer labs provide the same level of learning as hands-on
labs?
Anticipated Research Design: Group comparison design.
• Establish 2 groups with similar characteristics- anticipate 2 morning classes
being taught same subject.
• One group will receive laboratory instruction via virtual lab on the internet.
• Second group will receive laboratory instruction using lab equipment and
traditional experimental design.
• Both groups will have received the same background instruction and will have
been assigned the same homework leading up to the labs.
• Assessment of lab will be by traditional multiple choice testing criteria.
• The difference in test scores for the students in the two groups would depend on
the difference in laboratory experience.
Chapter 5.
1. Benefit of collecting qualitative: You can ask more questions about how they feel about a topic such a
science which might give insight into the effort put into the topic. Qualitative inquiry often can lead to a
more detailed quantitative study yielding data to support the research question.
2. Teacher researchers must insure the quality of the collected data because of the emotions often
involved with studying students and student habits. Public school education in particular usually deals
with students from a wide variety of socio economic backgrounds. Mis-use of mis-interpretation of data
3. due to failure to understand all the parameters involved with the study population can have emotional
risks and can devalue your research results.
3. Observation: Observation made of same grade, same subject teacher. I did not offer any comments
during the period of my observation but instead held a reflection session with the teacher who had been
observed following the observation. My observation focused on teacher presentation of a computer
activity and interaction with students once they were involved in the activity itself.
Errors: I focused on actual delivery information instead of style. How did students respond to the
instructions? Were they clear on what to do? Did teacher allow time for questions before dismissing to the
activity? During the activity did I mark on my observation sheet the actions of the teacher as he interacted
with students? Were there students off task because they didn’t understand the instructions or because the
task was too difficult? Was the teacher able to get around to all students needing assistance?
4. Semistructured Interview Guide
Interview with teachers:
• How long have you been teaching this grade level and subject matter?
• How often do you assign homework?
• How many nights do you give for students to complete the homework?
• Do you have a routine day of the week that your homework is due or is it random?
• How long do you anticipate it will take your students to complete the assigned work?
• Do you provide time in class for students to start homework?
• Do you grade your homework?
• How much does homework count towards your students’ total grade?
• What do you think is the purpose of your routine homework?
• Do you accept late work?
• If you do accept late work does it receive full credit or is it reduced in value?
Interview with administrator
• Is there a school policy regarding how much homework is assigned?
• Who monitors a grade level homework volume?
• Do you provide guidelines as to how homework should contribute to a student’s grade?