Service quality dimensions and superior customer
perceived value in retail banks: An empirical study
on Mexican consumers

Presenter: Laura Chen
Advisor : Dr. Hao-Wei Yang
Dr. Wan-Ching Chen
Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu
Date: 10/28/2013
1
Citation
Vera, J., & Trujillo, A. (2013). Service quality
dimensions and superior customer perceived
value in retail banks: An empirical study on
Mexican consumers. Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, 20, 579-586.

2
Contents
Introduction
Introduction
Literature Review
Literature Review
Methodology
Methodology
Result & Conclusion
Result & Conclusion
My future study
My future study
3
Introduction
Background
Service quality has gained importance in many
companies as a factor that may be useful to
increase brand loyalty.

5
Purpose
This study focuses on the retail-banking sector
and on the relation between service quality,
satisfaction, loyalty and a customer’s
perceived value of their bank.

6
Literature Review
Literature review
Service quality is a client judgment where he
compares his expectations with the actual
delivery in each service dimension.

(Parasuraman et al., 1985)
8
Literature review
Service quality could have a positive effect
on business profitability, because it may
enhance client retention, and attract new
customers.

(Zeithaml, 2000)
9
Literature review
Superior customer value is accomplished when a
seller creates more value for the customer than
the competitor does.
(Slater & Narver, 2000)

Customer perceived
Customer perceived
value
value

Value
Value
judgment
judgment

10
Literature review
SERVPERF (service performance only) model may
be a more reliable service quality measure indicator
then SERVQUAL for several industries with greater
consistency.
PERFORMANCE

ONLY
ONLY
SERVPERF

(Brady et al., 2002)
11
Conceptual framework
H1: In the retail banking sector, there is a
direct relation between the performance of
the service quality dimensions and the
client satisfaction, as well as, with client
loyalty.

H3: If service quality constitutes an is a direct relation between
H2: There
element to differentiate between
the performance of the service quality
retail bank brands than there should and the customer
dimensions
be differences in the perception of value of the retail bank
perceived
the performance of servicebrand.
quality
attributes between brands.
12
Methodology
Data Collection
Procedure
Step 1
Step 1

A total of 250
questionnaires
were applied, 41
of these were
eliminated.

Step 2
Step 2

The clients
were chosen
through a
convenience
sampling.

Step 3
Step 3

The items were
measured by
using a 7-point
Likert scale.
Instrument
I would certainly
recommend bank
XYZ to friends and
acquaintances
without reservation.

In general, I feel satisfied
with the service bank
XYZ provided.

BANK XYZ does
things right the first
time.

I would pay a more elevated
price for the benefits I receive
from bank XYZ when compared
to the ones received by other
banks.
Instrument

Visual
aspect

Empathy

Assurance
Instrument

Items for customer perceived value show a
low weight in the factor.
Result & Discussion
Result
H1: In the retail banking sector, there is a direct relation
between the performance of the service quality dimensions
and the client satisfaction, as well as, client loyalty.
Result
H2: There is a direct relation between the performance of the
service quality and the customer perceived value of the retail
bank brand.
Result
H3: If service quality constitutes an element to differentiate between
retail bank brands then there should be differences in the perception
of the performance of service quality attributes between brands.
Discussion
H1: In the retail banking sector, there is a direct relation
between the performance of the service quality dimensions
and the client satisfaction, as well as, client loyalty.

Supported
Discussion
H2: There is a direct relation between the performance of the
service quality and the customer perceived value of the retail
bank brand.

Rejected
Discussion
H3: If service quality constitutes an element to differentiate
between retail bank brands then there should be differences
in the perception of the performance of service quality
attributes between brands.

Rejected
Conclusion
Conclusion
Service quality doesn’t constitute a
real source of superior customer
perceived value, which means it
doesn’t provide real source of brand
differentiation.

27
Conclusion
.
In this study customer perceived
value is measured by only one
item. Future studies may use three
or more items to ensure validity.

28
My future study
Variables
Participants
Target
Instrument
Data Analysis

Service quality
Customer satisfaction
Customer loyalty
Approximately 400 customers

Taiwan King of Dried Pork (Yi-Chin Food Co., Ltd)

Items from Lee et al. (2009)
α = 0.86
One - way ANOVA
Regression analysis (optional)
5 th ver

5 th ver

  • 1.
    Service quality dimensionsand superior customer perceived value in retail banks: An empirical study on Mexican consumers Presenter: Laura Chen Advisor : Dr. Hao-Wei Yang Dr. Wan-Ching Chen Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu Date: 10/28/2013 1
  • 2.
    Citation Vera, J., &Trujillo, A. (2013). Service quality dimensions and superior customer perceived value in retail banks: An empirical study on Mexican consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 579-586. 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Background Service quality hasgained importance in many companies as a factor that may be useful to increase brand loyalty. 5
  • 6.
    Purpose This study focuseson the retail-banking sector and on the relation between service quality, satisfaction, loyalty and a customer’s perceived value of their bank. 6
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Literature review Service qualityis a client judgment where he compares his expectations with the actual delivery in each service dimension. (Parasuraman et al., 1985) 8
  • 9.
    Literature review Service qualitycould have a positive effect on business profitability, because it may enhance client retention, and attract new customers. (Zeithaml, 2000) 9
  • 10.
    Literature review Superior customervalue is accomplished when a seller creates more value for the customer than the competitor does. (Slater & Narver, 2000) Customer perceived Customer perceived value value Value Value judgment judgment 10
  • 11.
    Literature review SERVPERF (serviceperformance only) model may be a more reliable service quality measure indicator then SERVQUAL for several industries with greater consistency. PERFORMANCE ONLY ONLY SERVPERF (Brady et al., 2002) 11
  • 12.
    Conceptual framework H1: Inthe retail banking sector, there is a direct relation between the performance of the service quality dimensions and the client satisfaction, as well as, with client loyalty. H3: If service quality constitutes an is a direct relation between H2: There element to differentiate between the performance of the service quality retail bank brands than there should and the customer dimensions be differences in the perception of value of the retail bank perceived the performance of servicebrand. quality attributes between brands. 12
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Procedure Step 1 Step 1 Atotal of 250 questionnaires were applied, 41 of these were eliminated. Step 2 Step 2 The clients were chosen through a convenience sampling. Step 3 Step 3 The items were measured by using a 7-point Likert scale.
  • 16.
    Instrument I would certainly recommendbank XYZ to friends and acquaintances without reservation. In general, I feel satisfied with the service bank XYZ provided. BANK XYZ does things right the first time. I would pay a more elevated price for the benefits I receive from bank XYZ when compared to the ones received by other banks.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Instrument Items for customerperceived value show a low weight in the factor.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Result H1: In theretail banking sector, there is a direct relation between the performance of the service quality dimensions and the client satisfaction, as well as, client loyalty.
  • 21.
    Result H2: There isa direct relation between the performance of the service quality and the customer perceived value of the retail bank brand.
  • 22.
    Result H3: If servicequality constitutes an element to differentiate between retail bank brands then there should be differences in the perception of the performance of service quality attributes between brands.
  • 23.
    Discussion H1: In theretail banking sector, there is a direct relation between the performance of the service quality dimensions and the client satisfaction, as well as, client loyalty. Supported
  • 24.
    Discussion H2: There isa direct relation between the performance of the service quality and the customer perceived value of the retail bank brand. Rejected
  • 25.
    Discussion H3: If servicequality constitutes an element to differentiate between retail bank brands then there should be differences in the perception of the performance of service quality attributes between brands. Rejected
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Conclusion Service quality doesn’tconstitute a real source of superior customer perceived value, which means it doesn’t provide real source of brand differentiation. 27
  • 28.
    Conclusion . In this studycustomer perceived value is measured by only one item. Future studies may use three or more items to ensure validity. 28
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Variables Participants Target Instrument Data Analysis Service quality Customersatisfaction Customer loyalty Approximately 400 customers Taiwan King of Dried Pork (Yi-Chin Food Co., Ltd) Items from Lee et al. (2009) α = 0.86 One - way ANOVA Regression analysis (optional)