MEPA QUARTER 4

1. TITLE PAGE
Please do include the following:
 Title of the Activity
* 4th Quarter DMEPA
 Municipality and composition
 Date of the activity

2. STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
Fiscal Year:
Quarter:
PPAs
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Physical
Output Indicators Target Actual Variance
Research
Colloquium
Number of education researches
completed

3. STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
Fiscal Year:
Quarter:
PPAs
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Physical
Output Indicators Target Actual Variance
Percentage of schools meeting the
standard ratio for teachers

4. KRA Specific
Program
Activity Outputs
Performance
Indicator
Physical Financial
Target Actual Variance Obligated Unutilized
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3 Activity 4
Municipality
Target Actual Variance

5. STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
Fiscal Year:
Quarter:
PPAs
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Physical Financial
Remarks
Output Indicators Target Actual Variance Target Actual Variance
EDUCATION
POLICY
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Outcome Indicators
Percentage of schools meeting the standard ratio for
teachers
a. Elementary
b. Junior High School
c. Senior High School
Number of newly-created teaching positions filled up
INCLUSIVE
EDUCATION
PROGRAM
Outcome Indicators
1. Percentage of learners enrolled
a. SPED (public)
b. ALIVE (public & private)
c. IPEd (public)
d. ALS
2. Percentage of learners provided with learning resources
Output Indicators
1. Number of schools offering
a. ALIVE
b. IPEd
c. SPED

6. STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
Fiscal Year:
Quarter:
PPAs
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Physical Financial
Remar
ks
Output Indicators Target Actual Variance Target Actual Variance
SUPPORT TO
SCHOOLS and
LEARNERS
PROGRAM
2. Number of public schools provided with
learning resources
Outcome Indicators
1. Retention rate
a. Elementary
b. Secondary (7-12)
2. Completion Rate
a. Elementary
b. Secondary (7-12)

7. QUALITY
Pillar Intermediate Outcome
Indicator
Total Enrolment
% of Learners Attaining NPL
Analysis AGENDA (Highlight policy
issues, program design
concerns, system
improvements that the
CO/ RO/ SDO should
immediately address)
M F Total M % F % Total %
Quality
3.1 Learners attain Stage 1
(K to Grade 3) learning
standards of fundamental
reading and
numeracy
skills
Percentage of
Learners
Attaining
Nearly
Proficient
Level
3.1.2 English
3.1.3 Filipino
3.1.4 MTB-
MLE
3.1.5 Numeracy

8. Pillar
Intermediate Outcome Indicator
Total Enrolment % of Learners Attaining NPL
Analysis AGENDA (Highlight policy
issues, program design
concerns, system
improvements that the
CO/ RO/ SDO should
immediately address)
M F Total M % F % Total %
Quality
3.2 Learners attain Stage 2
(Grades 4-6) learning
standards of literacy and
numeracy skills and apply
21st century skills to
various situations
3.2.1
Percentage of Grade 6
learners attaining nearly
proficient level or better in
literacy and numeracy
3.2.2 English
3.2.3 Filipino
3.2.4 Math
3.2.5 Science
3.2.6 HEKASI
3.3 Learners attain Stage 3
(Grades 7-10) learning
standards of
literacy and
numeracy skills and apply
21st century skills to
various situations
3.3.1
Percentage of Grade 10
learners attaining
proficient level or better in
Stage 3 literacy and
numeracy standards
3.3.2 English
3.3.3 Filipino
3.3.4 Math
3.3.5 Science
3.3.6 HEKASI

9. QUALITY
Pillar
Intermediate Outcome Indicator
Total Enrolment % of Learners Attaining NPL
Analysis AGENDA (Highlight policy
issues, program design
concerns, system
improvements that the
CO/ RO/ SDO should
immediately address)
M F Total M % F % Total %
Quality
3.4 Learners attain Stage 4
(Grades 11 and 12) learning
standards equipped with
knowledge and 21st century
competencies developed in
their chosen core, applied and
specialized SHS tracks
Percentage of Grade 12
learners attaining nearly
proficient level of better in
Stage 4 literacy and numeracy
standards
3.4.2 English
3.4.3 Filipino
3.4.4 Math
3.4.5 Science
3.4.6 Araling Panlipinan

10. STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
Fiscal Year:
Quarter:
PPAs
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Physical Financial
Remarks
Output Indicators Target Actual Variance Target Actual Variance
EDUCATION HUMAN
RESOURCE
Outcome Indicators
1. Increase in percentage of
schools conducting school
learning action cell (SLAC)
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM
Output Indicators
1. Number of teachers and
teaching-related staff
trained
a. Teachers
b. Teaching-related staff

11. STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
Fiscal Year:
Quarter:
PPAs
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Physical Financial
Remarks
Output Indicators Target Actual Variance Target Actual Variance
Number of learners
benefitting from the
“School Feeding
Program"

12. ● Analysis:
○ Highlight PPAs with achieved targets (Physical & Financial) and its
facilitating factors.
○ Highlight PPAs with failed targets (Physical & Financial) and its
hindering factors.
○ What are the most significant change stories of Inclusive Education
Programs particularly to the recipient schools/learners/teachers?
○ What are the catch-up plans?

13. The results in the QUALITY should
clearly be presented through
graphs and analyses.

14.  Best Practices for Quality and
Name of the Program
 Description and the Narrative
on the impact of the program
 How will it be improved?
BEST PRACTICES
Pictures

15. Policy Issues/ Program
Design Concerns/ System
Improvement/ Mitigation/ Intervention/ TA Needed
Concerned Office/ Technical
Assistance needed from the
CO/ RO/SDO
ISSUES, GAPS, AND RECOMMENDATION

16. PROPOSED CATCH-UP PLAN
Program Activity Performance
Indicator
Timeline Person
Responsible
Original Date Proposed
Date for
Change

17. WAYS Forward
Program Activity Performance
Indicator
Timeline Person
Responsible
Original Date Proposed
Date for
Change

18. Note:
 The presenter may use the slide deck which reflects the MATATAG
branding of DepEd.
 The presenter may put creative input but must not over-do and
overpower the data.
 The data must be free from error to avoid inaccuracy of the result and
must be based from the discussion from SMEPA.
 The presenter may use transitions on the slides but should be minimal to
secure clarity when reporting.