From the article just published in Psychology Research, “300,000 (at Least) Years for Homo Sapiens to Develop Writing: A Review of Silvia Ferrara’s The Greatest Invention, Tr. Todd Portnowitz“ to my presentation on Monday 20, November 2023 on DISJUNCTURE vs REVOLUTION, POSTGRESSION vs. PROGRESSION, the central question of the emergence of language and the passage from oral language to writing will be central in the IFIASA MCDSARE 2023 conference https://www.ifiasa.com/mcdsare-event. A video presentation covering the first part of the general topic with the newly discovered Hominin Homo Naledi in South Africa in the background, on the IFIASA site, presents this Hominin who had reached the level of transcribing his oral language into symbolical geometric signs around 300,000 BCE. Compare this with Neanderthals who did the same thing in Gibraltar around 100,000 BCE and with Homo Sapiens who did the same thing in his European and Indonesian caves around 45,000 BCE. Who is the bad pupil? The second part on the phylogeny of language from the emergence of oral articulated language to the writing of all languages, the transfer from oral to visual engravings or symbols, will openly be the question of freedom and freedom of choice in archaeological times for Hominins. The third part on the Versailles Treaty and how it still dictates the present and future of the world will be kept for publication, soon, I hope.
From the article just published in Psychology Research to my presentation on Monday 20, Nobvember 2023 on DISJUNCTURE vs REVOLUTION, POSTGRESSION vs. PROGRESSION, the central question of the emergence of language and the passage from oral language will be central. A video presentation covering the first part of the general topic with the newly discovered Hominin Homo Naledi in Souith Africa in the background on IFIASA site, presents this Hominin who had reached the level of transcribing his oral language into symbolical geometric signs. The second part on the phylogeny of language from the emergence of oral articulatred language to the writing of of all languages will openly being the question of freedom and freedom of choice in archaeological times for Hominins. The third part on the Versailles Treaty and how it still dictates the present and future of the world will be kept for publication.
Within 15-20 years ouor appeoach to the emergence of Humanity on this planet has run a tremendous distance and we can now envisage that human mental and culturazl characteristics existed several hundred years earlier than we though around 2000. Somze of these chjaracteristics also existed in pre-Sapiens hominin species like Naledis and Neanderthals and certainly Denisovans, plus some even older species. That’s why the brutal events we are still going through in our times are pathetic. And miserable.
Race, ethnicity and nation international perspectives on social conflictyoonshweyee
an international and comparative analysis of social division rooted in race, ethnicity and national identity. It provides an overview of the key issues underlying ethnic conflict which has now risen to the top of the international political agenda.
This paper purports to be a starting point to revisit existing approaches dealing with the origin and spread of languages in the light of the changed circumstances of the Twenty-first century without in any way undermining their applicability across space and time. The origin of spoken languages is intricately and inseparably interwoven and intertwined with the origin of human species as well, and in this paper, we propose a ‘Wholly-independent Multi-Regional hypothesis of the origin of Homo sapiens’ in response to both the highly-controversial and arguably antiquated ‘Out-of-Africa theory’ which we have stridently and vehemently opposed, along with all its protuberances and the contending Multi-Regional Hypothesis as well. The key tenets of this paper are therefore articulated based on this fundamental premise which is likely to upend existing presumptions and paradigms to a significant degree. Having said that, we must hasten to add that the evolutionary biology of language encompassing physical anthropology or genetics and other related areas of study, are wholly outside the purview of this paper. Structural linguistics and semantics are also outside the scope of this paper. In this paper, we examine the origins of spoken and written languages in pre-historic, proto-historic, historic, pre-globalized and post-globalized contexts and propose an ‘Epochal Polygenesis’ approach. As a part of this paper, we also provide a broad overview of early and current theories of the origin and spread of languages so that readers can compare our approaches with already existing ones and analyse the similarities and differences between the two. We propose and define several new concepts under the categories of contact-based scenarios and non-contact based scenarios such as the autochthonous origin of languages, the spread of properties of languages from key nodes, the ‘Theory of linguistic osmosis’ and the need to take historical and political factors into account while analysing the spread of languages. In this paper, we also propose among others, the ‘Theory of win-win paradigms’ and the ‘Net benefits approach’. We also emphasize the need to carry out a diachronic and synchronic assessment of the dynamics of languages spread and propose that this be made a continuous process so that the lessons learnt can be used to tweak and hone theories and models to perfection. This paper is likely to significantly up the ante in favour of a dynamics-driven approach by undermining the relative torpor now observed in this arguably vital sub-discipline and contribute greatly to the rapidly emerging field of language dynamics. We also hope that synchronic linguistics will finally get its due place under the sun in the post-globalised world, and will become a major driving force in linguistics in the Twenty-First Century.
From the article just published in Psychology Research to my presentation on Monday 20, Nobvember 2023 on DISJUNCTURE vs REVOLUTION, POSTGRESSION vs. PROGRESSION, the central question of the emergence of language and the passage from oral language will be central. A video presentation covering the first part of the general topic with the newly discovered Hominin Homo Naledi in Souith Africa in the background on IFIASA site, presents this Hominin who had reached the level of transcribing his oral language into symbolical geometric signs. The second part on the phylogeny of language from the emergence of oral articulatred language to the writing of of all languages will openly being the question of freedom and freedom of choice in archaeological times for Hominins. The third part on the Versailles Treaty and how it still dictates the present and future of the world will be kept for publication.
Within 15-20 years ouor appeoach to the emergence of Humanity on this planet has run a tremendous distance and we can now envisage that human mental and culturazl characteristics existed several hundred years earlier than we though around 2000. Somze of these chjaracteristics also existed in pre-Sapiens hominin species like Naledis and Neanderthals and certainly Denisovans, plus some even older species. That’s why the brutal events we are still going through in our times are pathetic. And miserable.
Race, ethnicity and nation international perspectives on social conflictyoonshweyee
an international and comparative analysis of social division rooted in race, ethnicity and national identity. It provides an overview of the key issues underlying ethnic conflict which has now risen to the top of the international political agenda.
This paper purports to be a starting point to revisit existing approaches dealing with the origin and spread of languages in the light of the changed circumstances of the Twenty-first century without in any way undermining their applicability across space and time. The origin of spoken languages is intricately and inseparably interwoven and intertwined with the origin of human species as well, and in this paper, we propose a ‘Wholly-independent Multi-Regional hypothesis of the origin of Homo sapiens’ in response to both the highly-controversial and arguably antiquated ‘Out-of-Africa theory’ which we have stridently and vehemently opposed, along with all its protuberances and the contending Multi-Regional Hypothesis as well. The key tenets of this paper are therefore articulated based on this fundamental premise which is likely to upend existing presumptions and paradigms to a significant degree. Having said that, we must hasten to add that the evolutionary biology of language encompassing physical anthropology or genetics and other related areas of study, are wholly outside the purview of this paper. Structural linguistics and semantics are also outside the scope of this paper. In this paper, we examine the origins of spoken and written languages in pre-historic, proto-historic, historic, pre-globalized and post-globalized contexts and propose an ‘Epochal Polygenesis’ approach. As a part of this paper, we also provide a broad overview of early and current theories of the origin and spread of languages so that readers can compare our approaches with already existing ones and analyse the similarities and differences between the two. We propose and define several new concepts under the categories of contact-based scenarios and non-contact based scenarios such as the autochthonous origin of languages, the spread of properties of languages from key nodes, the ‘Theory of linguistic osmosis’ and the need to take historical and political factors into account while analysing the spread of languages. In this paper, we also propose among others, the ‘Theory of win-win paradigms’ and the ‘Net benefits approach’. We also emphasize the need to carry out a diachronic and synchronic assessment of the dynamics of languages spread and propose that this be made a continuous process so that the lessons learnt can be used to tweak and hone theories and models to perfection. This paper is likely to significantly up the ante in favour of a dynamics-driven approach by undermining the relative torpor now observed in this arguably vital sub-discipline and contribute greatly to the rapidly emerging field of language dynamics. We also hope that synchronic linguistics will finally get its due place under the sun in the post-globalised world, and will become a major driving force in linguistics in the Twenty-First Century.
Rebooting Pedagogy and Education systems for the Twenty-first Century: Why ...Sujay Rao Mandavilli
Education is the fundamental pillar upon which any human civilization rests. As a matter of fact, no civilization in any meaningful form or degree has been possible in human history that has not been built on the bulwark and edifice of education. While literacy may have been limited to the privileged few in early ancient civilizations, it was these privileged few who controlled the masses and set the tempo for meaningful progress in such civilizations; educational systems have proven to be the
bedrock and foundational pillar upon which much of human accomplishment and achievement have rested, too. In spite of the naysayers, the cynics and the pessimists, education has expanded greatly in the twentieth century; while the worlds’ earliest civilizations were not western in the canonical sense of the term, there is no denying that western civilizations have pulled away strongly since then. Riding on the shoulders on ancient Greece, western intellectualism has been the bulwark upon which the superstructure of modern civilization has been built. Even as recently as the middle of the twentieth
century, the rest of the world (as opposed to the west) had a lot of catching up to do.
Thankfully and mercifully, a lot has changed since then. India in the 1950’s and 1960’s emphasized higher education but neglected universal primary education as evidenced by low primary school enrollments, and a high rate of dropouts. Since then, programs and schemes such as the Sarva Siksha
Abhiyan or education for all programs have increased primary school enrollment considerably; India now comfortably stands on the threshold of universal adult literacy. While the quantity of education has been augmented, quality has often failed to keep pace. The tenets and the essential doctrines forming a part and parcel of the foundational pillars of pedagogy and education are antiquated and are still steeped in the western experience. What is worse is that is very little awareness on the issue
of the need for change; this must be the foundation of all meaningful change, but alas, that foundation has yet to be built. In this book, we draw upon our long list of papers on the social science, particularly
anthropological pedagogy and the sociology of science, and propose the direction we believe
pedagogy must take in the twenty first century. This can be no one man army; we invite other scholars to contribute in eminent measure. We also believe that this i.e., a foundational assessment of the
concepts of pedagogy must become one of the more important and vital movements of the twenty-first century.
This work is also at the heart of our globalization of science movement as many, if not most concepts in various fields of the social science are based on old and archaic western-centric paradigms. There is
also an unnatural gap between various fields of social sciences and the non-social sciences too, just as careerism is rampant across disciplines and what we called ....
Using the modules below, answer the following essay questions.docxdickonsondorris
Using the modules below, answer the following essay questions:
Short Answer
Respond to 1of the following short answer questions. Your response should be at least 1-2 paragraphs long and written in full sentences. (10 points possible)
Option 3: Describe the role of religion in supporting people and culture. Please provide specific examples to illustrate and support your answer.
Essay Question
Answer 1of the following essay questions. Your response will be graded in terms of
accuracy, completeness, and relevancy of the ideas expressed. For full points, your answer should be written in complete sentences and be at least 5 paragraphs long with a recognizable introduction, and conclusion. Support your statements with specific examples from the course material, cite your sources both within the text of your essay and at the end of your essay. (15 points possible)
Choose one of the forms, and and discuss the "emic" and etic views of why this form of marriage "makes sense" (i.e., is adaptive) using specific examples from the course or course readings.
Use these modules:
1. What Is Anthropology?
The Subject Matter of Anthropology
Anthropology is the study of what it is to be human in the past and present, the things about people that are the same, and the things about them that are different. Anthropologists try to understand and describe the way in which humans think and behave and why we think and behave as we do. They help us recognize that much of what we think and do has been learned from the cultural worlds we walk in and that others do not necessarily experience or understand the world in the same way we do.
To understand humanity, anthropologists must study all of humanity, not just the most familiar or convenient human populations. Anthropology is cross-cultural. It seeks to understand how life is lived, experienced, and interpreted in different settings and at different times. It also seeks to understand how different people's unique histories and positions in larger contexts, such as the global economy, shape their lives. By studying people in their own contexts, anthropologists guard against conclusions that may be true for some, but not all. Anthropologists resist assumptions that any particular behavior, idea, or way of being is "natural" unless they are sure that no others do it, think about it, experience it, or interpret it differently. They challenge ethnocentrism wherever and whenever they find it.
Think about it:
Ideas about where infants should sleep can reflect notions of the "ideal" person a society is trying to develop. Many Americans, for example, highly value independence, individualism, and personal space and think, therefore, that infants "must" learn to sleep in their own cribs, often in their own rooms. People from other traditions, however, may find this practice cruel. Where do you think infants should sleep? Why? What does your opinion say about your values and traditions?
The Development of Anthropology
...
The Bell Jar Major Essay | Psychology & Cognitive Science | Behavioural .... The Bell Jar Language Paper 1 AQA | Teaching Resources. Adolescence in the Bell Jar and Catcher in the Rye Free Essay Example. Plath's "The Bell Jar" Metaphor Analysis Essay Prompt by Joseph Murphy. Sylvia plath the bell jar analysis essay. Sylvia plath the bell jar essay - thesispapers.web.fc2.com. The Bell Jar And One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest Analysis Essay Example .... The Bell Jar: Extract & Questions (AQA GCSE) | Teaching Resources. Present the way in which imprisonment is presented in 'The Bell Jar .... Analysis of The Bell Jar Novel by Sylvia Plath Essay.
Online 12th ISAPL International Congress
NEW PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH:
LANGUAGE, CULTURE, TECHNOLOGIES
June 3-5, 2021
The Conference ended just a few hours ago,
On Saturday, June 5th, 2021, at 18:30
245 pages
Virtual Celebration and Beer for All
It is now high time to look at the future because the conference was a success despite the COVID-19 pandemic that has been bombarding us with confinements and travel bans. We just ran Virtual, and we made it an event.
You will find here the full book of abstracts and a presentation of the results and ^petspectyivesof the Congress
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU, Vide-President ISAPL
How to Write an Argumentative Essay Step By Step - Gudwriter. FREE 15+ Argumentative Essay Samples in PDF | MS Word. Argumentative Essay Format High School - Essay Writing Top. sample-argumentative-essay.pdf | DocDroid.
Welcome to the Western Original Sin & Fare Thee Well in HellEditions La Dondaine
I just published Welcome to the Western Original Sin & Fare Thee Well in Hell. James Harrod is a misguided white supremacist who thinks he is the archangel Gabriel. He uses a fiery keyboard on his computer to reject all those who do not speak Turkic languages, Indo-European languages, and Indo-Aryan languages. And he rejects the people who live in sub-Saharan Africa, you know all these black people, back to the dying hell of their jungles. He is one step away from rejecting all Asian people who speak any sort of isolating language, and he remains neutral about it, meaning he is guilty by proxy.
Bernard Marr just published Generative AI in Practice (1), which brings together the matter he has been dealing with on his blogs: Artificial Intelligence from the simple practical point of view of a user along with a systematic question about what can the consequences be for the various jobs these users have? But the book is always schematic when it shows the negative consequences will not compare with the positive consequences, though bad or good, they will require a lot of changes in the way we work, the jobs available, and the mindset of the users.
Bernard Marr does not insist so much on the negative sides of GenAI, but he does list them, particularly all sorts of cheating by using GenAI to replace one’s own writing work, all types of misuse of the intellectual property of such mechanical production of text, images, videos or any other copyrightable product that the user presents as his/her own.
But he does not enter the details, and thus he remains superficial. The problems of misinformation, hallucination, and bias are a lot less important, even with deep fakes, though Bernard Marr remains superficial on such dangers. He considers these GenAI products more like patentable or trademark problems, which they are but that’s the only side or point of view of the businesses using this technology.
At the present moment, lawsuits are emerging on the Intellectual Property front with people getting ready to go to court for unauthorized use of protected data and items within LLMs, or the use of voices, slightly synthesized (hence plagiarism and plain theft) as commercial products sold with an unshared profit. I will concentrate, in the second part, on chapter 10 on education to enter some details I know from the practice of self-learning at many levels of the educational system. (2)
Les Arts en Balade in Clermont-Ferrand this month of May 2024 were a success because they expanded to two cities outside Clermont conurbation, Thiers and Vic-Le-Comte, there were many people everywhere, there were 240+ artists or groups in about the same number of places: public spaces dedicated for such events, supportive professional institutions like the Order of Lawyers and the Order of Architects, many stores of all sorts opening their businesses to one or two artists, and also many apartments in the city transformed into workshops where artists could present their work. They were also a success because they lasted four days and were just as dense on Friday, May 17 as on the three following days up to Monday, May 20. Note the case of Michelin who opened their conference rooms and galleries in their Headquarters to three artists with a very good service guiding the visitors and making feel, equally at ease, the audience and the works of art, even from some green challenge declared to be ecological. Thank God we are not in the Orsay Museum of Le Louvre
This complete covering of the event I was able to work on, plus some suggestions for further development and opening to other arts than only plastic arts inside exhibition rooms or halls and on portable media. The opinions and tips are just mine of course, not those of an Artificial Intelligence requested to caress the wild artistic animals of this event smoothly and avoid ruffling their hairs. I apologize if some find it slightly rough at times. Arts are often harsh, and thus critics have to be harsh too. To critically cover an art exhibition is a love affair, and as they say in French, we could pretend that good lovers are also good at chastising those they love.
Les Arts en Balade à Clermont-Ferrand ce mois de mai 2024 ont été un succès car ils se sont étendus à deux villes hors agglomération clermontoise, Thiers et Vic-Le-Comte, il y avait beaucoup de monde partout, il y avait plus de 240 artistes ou groupes dans environ le même nombre de lieux : des espaces publics dédiés à de tels événements, des institutions professionnelles exprimant ainsi leur soutien comme l'Ordre des Avocats et l'Ordre des Architectes, de nombreux magasins en tout genre ouvrant leurs commerces à un ou deux artistes, mais aussi de nombreux appartements en ville transformés en ateliers. où les artistes pouvaient présenter leur travail. Ils furent également une réussite car ils durèrent quatre jours et furent tout aussi denses le vendredi 17 mai que les trois jours suivants jusqu'au lundi 20 mai. A noter le cas de Michelin qui a ouvert ses salles de conférence et d’exposition à son siège social à trois artistes avec un très bon service guidant les visiteurs et faisant sentir, également à l'aise, le public et les œuvres d'art, même de quelque défi vert déclaré écologique. Dieu merci, nous ne sommes pas au Musée d'Orsay ou du Louvre
Ce reportage complet de l'événement sur lequel j'ai pu travailler, ainsi que ...
A novel of political fiction that does not reach science-fiction but wants to tell us a lot about the modern world and what the choices are for us in this decaying future. The pattern, the Gestalt of this book seems to be that no matter what humans try to do, good or bad, progressive or reactionary, democratic or dictatorial, there is no hope and no future for those initiatives. Any attempt at changing the decaying world we live in is doomed to be a failure.
What is history? The production of what happens in our world, in fact, in the cosmos, and no human individual, no human crowd, no human anything can control or change the course of such events. If by any chance we want to understand what makes history, we have to consider billions, maybe trillions of parameters in the cosmos and we, the human dwarves we are, do not even control half a dozen of them and our vanity makes us believe we can command the cosmos because we want to be gods. In the old days and in other civilizations than the Western denied Bible, they were humble enough to give this power to a God that was not of the human species.
Here Salman Rushdie follows a witch bewitched by a goddess who pretends she can create a whole empire from a bag, or rather a sack of seeds, and this leads to a total and pitiful defeat and absolute termination of the attempt, but it means Salman Rushdie is predicting that all the positive elements his witch tries, religious tolerance, education for boys and girls equally, women’s rights, gender-friendly policies, peace and coexistence, and finally freedom of expression are all doomed to fail and crumble as soon as they reach some height. In other words, his novel and his vision are the rewriting of the Babel Tower myth.
Sorry boys and girls, no future for any progressive dream, just as much as for any regressive nightmare. Life and history are neither a dream nor a nightmare. They are nothing but cosmic determinism governed by the cosmos itself, and we can be happy with the fact our world is not in a black hole. But after all, maybe that’s the destiny and fate of humanity, to end up in a bottomless black hole.
More Related Content
Similar to 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
Rebooting Pedagogy and Education systems for the Twenty-first Century: Why ...Sujay Rao Mandavilli
Education is the fundamental pillar upon which any human civilization rests. As a matter of fact, no civilization in any meaningful form or degree has been possible in human history that has not been built on the bulwark and edifice of education. While literacy may have been limited to the privileged few in early ancient civilizations, it was these privileged few who controlled the masses and set the tempo for meaningful progress in such civilizations; educational systems have proven to be the
bedrock and foundational pillar upon which much of human accomplishment and achievement have rested, too. In spite of the naysayers, the cynics and the pessimists, education has expanded greatly in the twentieth century; while the worlds’ earliest civilizations were not western in the canonical sense of the term, there is no denying that western civilizations have pulled away strongly since then. Riding on the shoulders on ancient Greece, western intellectualism has been the bulwark upon which the superstructure of modern civilization has been built. Even as recently as the middle of the twentieth
century, the rest of the world (as opposed to the west) had a lot of catching up to do.
Thankfully and mercifully, a lot has changed since then. India in the 1950’s and 1960’s emphasized higher education but neglected universal primary education as evidenced by low primary school enrollments, and a high rate of dropouts. Since then, programs and schemes such as the Sarva Siksha
Abhiyan or education for all programs have increased primary school enrollment considerably; India now comfortably stands on the threshold of universal adult literacy. While the quantity of education has been augmented, quality has often failed to keep pace. The tenets and the essential doctrines forming a part and parcel of the foundational pillars of pedagogy and education are antiquated and are still steeped in the western experience. What is worse is that is very little awareness on the issue
of the need for change; this must be the foundation of all meaningful change, but alas, that foundation has yet to be built. In this book, we draw upon our long list of papers on the social science, particularly
anthropological pedagogy and the sociology of science, and propose the direction we believe
pedagogy must take in the twenty first century. This can be no one man army; we invite other scholars to contribute in eminent measure. We also believe that this i.e., a foundational assessment of the
concepts of pedagogy must become one of the more important and vital movements of the twenty-first century.
This work is also at the heart of our globalization of science movement as many, if not most concepts in various fields of the social science are based on old and archaic western-centric paradigms. There is
also an unnatural gap between various fields of social sciences and the non-social sciences too, just as careerism is rampant across disciplines and what we called ....
Using the modules below, answer the following essay questions.docxdickonsondorris
Using the modules below, answer the following essay questions:
Short Answer
Respond to 1of the following short answer questions. Your response should be at least 1-2 paragraphs long and written in full sentences. (10 points possible)
Option 3: Describe the role of religion in supporting people and culture. Please provide specific examples to illustrate and support your answer.
Essay Question
Answer 1of the following essay questions. Your response will be graded in terms of
accuracy, completeness, and relevancy of the ideas expressed. For full points, your answer should be written in complete sentences and be at least 5 paragraphs long with a recognizable introduction, and conclusion. Support your statements with specific examples from the course material, cite your sources both within the text of your essay and at the end of your essay. (15 points possible)
Choose one of the forms, and and discuss the "emic" and etic views of why this form of marriage "makes sense" (i.e., is adaptive) using specific examples from the course or course readings.
Use these modules:
1. What Is Anthropology?
The Subject Matter of Anthropology
Anthropology is the study of what it is to be human in the past and present, the things about people that are the same, and the things about them that are different. Anthropologists try to understand and describe the way in which humans think and behave and why we think and behave as we do. They help us recognize that much of what we think and do has been learned from the cultural worlds we walk in and that others do not necessarily experience or understand the world in the same way we do.
To understand humanity, anthropologists must study all of humanity, not just the most familiar or convenient human populations. Anthropology is cross-cultural. It seeks to understand how life is lived, experienced, and interpreted in different settings and at different times. It also seeks to understand how different people's unique histories and positions in larger contexts, such as the global economy, shape their lives. By studying people in their own contexts, anthropologists guard against conclusions that may be true for some, but not all. Anthropologists resist assumptions that any particular behavior, idea, or way of being is "natural" unless they are sure that no others do it, think about it, experience it, or interpret it differently. They challenge ethnocentrism wherever and whenever they find it.
Think about it:
Ideas about where infants should sleep can reflect notions of the "ideal" person a society is trying to develop. Many Americans, for example, highly value independence, individualism, and personal space and think, therefore, that infants "must" learn to sleep in their own cribs, often in their own rooms. People from other traditions, however, may find this practice cruel. Where do you think infants should sleep? Why? What does your opinion say about your values and traditions?
The Development of Anthropology
...
The Bell Jar Major Essay | Psychology & Cognitive Science | Behavioural .... The Bell Jar Language Paper 1 AQA | Teaching Resources. Adolescence in the Bell Jar and Catcher in the Rye Free Essay Example. Plath's "The Bell Jar" Metaphor Analysis Essay Prompt by Joseph Murphy. Sylvia plath the bell jar analysis essay. Sylvia plath the bell jar essay - thesispapers.web.fc2.com. The Bell Jar And One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest Analysis Essay Example .... The Bell Jar: Extract & Questions (AQA GCSE) | Teaching Resources. Present the way in which imprisonment is presented in 'The Bell Jar .... Analysis of The Bell Jar Novel by Sylvia Plath Essay.
Online 12th ISAPL International Congress
NEW PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH:
LANGUAGE, CULTURE, TECHNOLOGIES
June 3-5, 2021
The Conference ended just a few hours ago,
On Saturday, June 5th, 2021, at 18:30
245 pages
Virtual Celebration and Beer for All
It is now high time to look at the future because the conference was a success despite the COVID-19 pandemic that has been bombarding us with confinements and travel bans. We just ran Virtual, and we made it an event.
You will find here the full book of abstracts and a presentation of the results and ^petspectyivesof the Congress
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU, Vide-President ISAPL
How to Write an Argumentative Essay Step By Step - Gudwriter. FREE 15+ Argumentative Essay Samples in PDF | MS Word. Argumentative Essay Format High School - Essay Writing Top. sample-argumentative-essay.pdf | DocDroid.
Welcome to the Western Original Sin & Fare Thee Well in HellEditions La Dondaine
I just published Welcome to the Western Original Sin & Fare Thee Well in Hell. James Harrod is a misguided white supremacist who thinks he is the archangel Gabriel. He uses a fiery keyboard on his computer to reject all those who do not speak Turkic languages, Indo-European languages, and Indo-Aryan languages. And he rejects the people who live in sub-Saharan Africa, you know all these black people, back to the dying hell of their jungles. He is one step away from rejecting all Asian people who speak any sort of isolating language, and he remains neutral about it, meaning he is guilty by proxy.
Bernard Marr just published Generative AI in Practice (1), which brings together the matter he has been dealing with on his blogs: Artificial Intelligence from the simple practical point of view of a user along with a systematic question about what can the consequences be for the various jobs these users have? But the book is always schematic when it shows the negative consequences will not compare with the positive consequences, though bad or good, they will require a lot of changes in the way we work, the jobs available, and the mindset of the users.
Bernard Marr does not insist so much on the negative sides of GenAI, but he does list them, particularly all sorts of cheating by using GenAI to replace one’s own writing work, all types of misuse of the intellectual property of such mechanical production of text, images, videos or any other copyrightable product that the user presents as his/her own.
But he does not enter the details, and thus he remains superficial. The problems of misinformation, hallucination, and bias are a lot less important, even with deep fakes, though Bernard Marr remains superficial on such dangers. He considers these GenAI products more like patentable or trademark problems, which they are but that’s the only side or point of view of the businesses using this technology.
At the present moment, lawsuits are emerging on the Intellectual Property front with people getting ready to go to court for unauthorized use of protected data and items within LLMs, or the use of voices, slightly synthesized (hence plagiarism and plain theft) as commercial products sold with an unshared profit. I will concentrate, in the second part, on chapter 10 on education to enter some details I know from the practice of self-learning at many levels of the educational system. (2)
Les Arts en Balade in Clermont-Ferrand this month of May 2024 were a success because they expanded to two cities outside Clermont conurbation, Thiers and Vic-Le-Comte, there were many people everywhere, there were 240+ artists or groups in about the same number of places: public spaces dedicated for such events, supportive professional institutions like the Order of Lawyers and the Order of Architects, many stores of all sorts opening their businesses to one or two artists, and also many apartments in the city transformed into workshops where artists could present their work. They were also a success because they lasted four days and were just as dense on Friday, May 17 as on the three following days up to Monday, May 20. Note the case of Michelin who opened their conference rooms and galleries in their Headquarters to three artists with a very good service guiding the visitors and making feel, equally at ease, the audience and the works of art, even from some green challenge declared to be ecological. Thank God we are not in the Orsay Museum of Le Louvre
This complete covering of the event I was able to work on, plus some suggestions for further development and opening to other arts than only plastic arts inside exhibition rooms or halls and on portable media. The opinions and tips are just mine of course, not those of an Artificial Intelligence requested to caress the wild artistic animals of this event smoothly and avoid ruffling their hairs. I apologize if some find it slightly rough at times. Arts are often harsh, and thus critics have to be harsh too. To critically cover an art exhibition is a love affair, and as they say in French, we could pretend that good lovers are also good at chastising those they love.
Les Arts en Balade à Clermont-Ferrand ce mois de mai 2024 ont été un succès car ils se sont étendus à deux villes hors agglomération clermontoise, Thiers et Vic-Le-Comte, il y avait beaucoup de monde partout, il y avait plus de 240 artistes ou groupes dans environ le même nombre de lieux : des espaces publics dédiés à de tels événements, des institutions professionnelles exprimant ainsi leur soutien comme l'Ordre des Avocats et l'Ordre des Architectes, de nombreux magasins en tout genre ouvrant leurs commerces à un ou deux artistes, mais aussi de nombreux appartements en ville transformés en ateliers. où les artistes pouvaient présenter leur travail. Ils furent également une réussite car ils durèrent quatre jours et furent tout aussi denses le vendredi 17 mai que les trois jours suivants jusqu'au lundi 20 mai. A noter le cas de Michelin qui a ouvert ses salles de conférence et d’exposition à son siège social à trois artistes avec un très bon service guidant les visiteurs et faisant sentir, également à l'aise, le public et les œuvres d'art, même de quelque défi vert déclaré écologique. Dieu merci, nous ne sommes pas au Musée d'Orsay ou du Louvre
Ce reportage complet de l'événement sur lequel j'ai pu travailler, ainsi que ...
A novel of political fiction that does not reach science-fiction but wants to tell us a lot about the modern world and what the choices are for us in this decaying future. The pattern, the Gestalt of this book seems to be that no matter what humans try to do, good or bad, progressive or reactionary, democratic or dictatorial, there is no hope and no future for those initiatives. Any attempt at changing the decaying world we live in is doomed to be a failure.
What is history? The production of what happens in our world, in fact, in the cosmos, and no human individual, no human crowd, no human anything can control or change the course of such events. If by any chance we want to understand what makes history, we have to consider billions, maybe trillions of parameters in the cosmos and we, the human dwarves we are, do not even control half a dozen of them and our vanity makes us believe we can command the cosmos because we want to be gods. In the old days and in other civilizations than the Western denied Bible, they were humble enough to give this power to a God that was not of the human species.
Here Salman Rushdie follows a witch bewitched by a goddess who pretends she can create a whole empire from a bag, or rather a sack of seeds, and this leads to a total and pitiful defeat and absolute termination of the attempt, but it means Salman Rushdie is predicting that all the positive elements his witch tries, religious tolerance, education for boys and girls equally, women’s rights, gender-friendly policies, peace and coexistence, and finally freedom of expression are all doomed to fail and crumble as soon as they reach some height. In other words, his novel and his vision are the rewriting of the Babel Tower myth.
Sorry boys and girls, no future for any progressive dream, just as much as for any regressive nightmare. Life and history are neither a dream nor a nightmare. They are nothing but cosmic determinism governed by the cosmos itself, and we can be happy with the fact our world is not in a black hole. But after all, maybe that’s the destiny and fate of humanity, to end up in a bottomless black hole.
This series is very well done, suspenseful, at least as much as possible, twisted and distorted like any crime series should be but unluckily it is biased. It states to anyone who wants to listen that crime has roots in only one thing: family dysfunctioning and nothing else. The fact that society leads some people who do not fit in the standard mold to rebellion, frustration and violence by being biased against them and bullying them all the time and if they want to have contacts with people, they have to go down on their knees and beg for a favor.
That’s too bad because the cases in this rural north Wales area deserve a lot better, and probably, a more open vision of crime in this community.
LA CHAISE-DIEU MÉDIÉVALE & LA RÉVOLUTION BÉNÉDICTINE--MEDIEVAL LA CHAISE-DIEU...Editions La Dondaine
On July 13, 2024, at La Chaise-Dieu, the European Network of Casadean Sites will present a public conference on the topic of the Benedictine Revolution in Livradois-Forez, led by the La Chaise-Dieu Abbaye, starting a bit earlier with the religious reform brought up by Charlemagne in the 9th century. The Abbaye was founded less than 200 years later. The conference will focus the discussion – and it has to be a discussion – on the consequences of the Carolingian religious reform, the agricultural revolution with the invention of the horse collar and the management of the land, the rotation of crops, cultivation, and fertilization. Then the proto-industrial revolution that will bring five types of watermills for grain, oil, tan, hemp (fiber and cloth), and slightly later paper. This will make Livradois-Forez an essential region producing hemp cables and hemp cloth for ships. The first result was 75 days without any work in the year, no work before and after morning and evening angelus, and a pause with midday angelus. The second result was better food and demographical expansion, up to the end of the 13th century.
Then things became darker. Overpopulation brought unrest and all sorts of contests and conflicts at the religious level itself (Crusades in the Middle East, but also against the Cathars in France. Then in 1346, the Black Death, a pandemic in Europe of the bubonic plague, caused a tremendous level of deaths. Then, the One Hundred Years War started in 1337. The resilience of the population enabled Europe in general to go through, and around 1450 the printing press was developed by Gutenberg enabling the printing of books for the highly-needed university training of great numbers of people to bring Europe back on its feet. The Renaissance was the result of this period, a tremendously positive and creative period, and at the same time, a highly-disturbed era with The Reformation, and the religious wars that concerned all countries at a time when nationalism was emerging.
Two speakers-debaters will present the five or six centuries concerned as fast as possible to let the audience debate questions like:
1- The influence and impact of Charlemagne’s religious reform.
2- The feudal system: land ownership and serfdom.
3- The role of technology to produce energy, replace human work, and develop new products.
4- Religious tensions with Avignon and Rome conformist Popes.
5- The role of The Inquisition and religious justice.
6- The fate of the cable industry when Omerin In Ambert is number one in Europe or the world for various high-security and high-technicity cables.
7- The culture: architecture, music, painting, carving, theater, oratorio and opera, literature.
It will take place at LA CHAISE-DIEU – AUDITORIUM GEORGES CZIFFRA
SAMEDI 13 JUILLET 2024 – 14-17 HEURES 30.
The two main speakers so far are Dr Jacques COULARDEAU (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) and PhD Graduate Student Clément GOMY (Université Clermont Auvergne
Xavier Rouard searches and researches the linguistic world, scientific research of course, for the origin, the cradle, the homeland, or the motherland, of Indo-European. He is not the only one in the world, but he goes against practically all the others by positioning this linguistic nursery in Central Asia based on a Eurasian or trans-Eurasian language or languages. But precisely Eurasian languages only came into existence from the moment when syntactic-analytic Indo-Iranian languages left the Iranian plateau where they had stationed themselves when they arrived from Black Africa, some 40,000 years ago, or BCE, not much difference here. They had to go through the Ice Age first and finally get on the move after this climate event probably around 15,000 BCE, some east to the southern Asian continent, with Pakistan and India, others west down into Mesopotamia and from there to Europe. These people, on both side, encountered people who spoke other languages, Turkic agglutinative languages, and isolating Sino-Tibetan languages, mostly. These languages had integrated the Denisovans and their own language(s). Thes encountered people were hybrid Homo Sapiens with a varying proportion of Denisovan DNA in Central Asia, and the same in Mesopotamia with a varying proportion od Neanderthalensis DNA. When they reached Europe, the population was essentially of Turkic language and origin with a varying level of hybridization with European Homo Neanderthalensis. It is such encounters that generated or engendered the various Indo-European or Indo-Aryan languages
My approach is phylogenetic and thus it is absolutely impossible for me not to take into consideration the migrations and geographic, hence social, cultural and linguistic movements of these populations. That’s the basic principle of Joseph Greenberg who considered that all these migrations had only one matrix or melting pot that produced the emergence of human articulated language on the basis of what these emerging Homo Sapiens inherited from the other Hominins from which they were descending.
But Joseph Greenberg and his disciples encountered a problem: in all language you should find a certain number of words whose “roots” are universal and stable in meaning. These are the roots coming from Black Africa before any migration out of Black Africa. The problem is then that it does not enable any topology of languages. So, they, Greenberg and his disciples, tried to introduce “grammatical” or “syntactic” words, but even so it does go that far.
To get somewhere you have to ask the question about the phylogeny of articulated language(s), and there you only find three articulations in a precise order: root-languages (by the way vastly ignored by Xavier Rouard), Isolating character languages, and agglutinative as well as synthetic-analytic languages according to the migrations out of Black Africa. If you do not consider this phylogeny, then you put all sorts of languages together in the melting pot [...}
Three crime series in one entry.
First, The Brokenwood Mysteries; seasons 1 to 3.
Second, The Coroner, Complete Series.
Third, The Unforgotten, Series 1 to 4, Complete Series.
Police series, detective stories, criminal mysteries, and many other options in the field of crime and delinquency have been explored by the English from the first moment they started existing, a very long time ago.
Shakespeare and he was not the first author in the field, loved those stories of crimes and criminals, having people assassinated, or mutilated, or tortured on the stage from Titus Andronicus to Romeo and Juliet.
Dickens was a good one too in that field, but Shakespeare looked at crime from the outside, from some ethical point of view. Dickens looked at it from inside, from the point of view of the criminals themselves forced to commit crimes in order to simply survive.
Then you had Mary Shelley and her Frankenstein and then later on Dracula came into the picture, and many others trill we came across Conan Doyle who edicted the proper form of a crime story or detective story, hence an investigation of a crime we can only see from outside, and the investigation is to get into it to see how it got developed and who was the criminal.
Since then, with the radio at first, the cinema next, and finally television leading directly to streaming and the Internet, those police adventures have just become adventures, and the extreme form is what they call action films where violence is no longer criminal since it has been transformed into the ultimate survival if not the final renascence before the apocalypse.
Enjoy these series.
The Mayas are more a cultural and historical mystery than a vast field of knowledge. We know less than we can even imagine about them. Where did they come from? What language did they speak before coming to Mesoamerica? What were their beliefs before arriving in Yucatan? They brought with them cacao, chocolate, writing, mathematics, extremely advanced calendars, phenomenal knowledge about stars, planets and the cosmos. They even brought with them a vigesimal counting system with the mathematics going along with it, including the equivalent of our zero (that we borrowed from the Arabs in the 17th century) that enabled them to count up to the infinite.
The most remarkable achievement is that they managed to merge phenomenal art with the glyphic writing system of theirs. We know the glyphs were works of art, for one, and a syllabary phonetic writing system, for two. For a very long time the second aspect was rejected, particularly by Sir Eric Thompson. Luckily this untruth was rejected after his death, with a little bit of disregard before his death. The glyphs were not flat symbolic of items and purely artistic, like some kind of secondary if not superfluous decoration. The colonizing Spaniards considered that decoration as diabolical and they burned and destroyed all the books and artifacts that carried such artistic representations of Maya reality and such glyphs that could only be the language of the devil.
Imagine how surprised I was when I discovered this catalogue of an exhibition at the MET Museum of Art in New York. They provide some images of the glyphs, and even some sentences written with them. But they systematically ignore the glyphs, transliterate the sentences and words into Latin-transliterated Maya, and simply work and speculate on these transliterations and their translations into English. They lose all the richness of meaning and beauty of the glyphs. In other words, they terminate, bring to a final end the destructive work of the Spaniards, the culturicide of the Mayas and the Maya culture and civilization. My full study (about 15,000 words, only in English) is available
The 3 Literacies of Modern Age, the Trikirion of CommunicationEditions La Dondaine
Review of the Trikirion of Communication:
Symboleracy, Numeracy and Techneracy
The starting point is the phylogeny of communication because the educational topic I am going to address cannot even exist if there is no communication. We have to understand that all Hominins were communicating. Probably all Hominins after Homo Erectus included had some command of some articulated language, but only Homo Sapiens reached the comprehensive and sustainable command of the fully-articulated language, probably around 200,000 BCE.
The next great stage Is the development of representational and symbolic Inscriptions and paintings or engravings on all durable media available, rockface in caves, stone, bone, ivory, and tusks. This symbolic transcription of stories and experience, maybe some spiritual language accompanying some rituals, is the first form of writing seen as symbolic transcription and going back to 300,000 BCE with Homo Naledi, 100,000 BCE with Homo Neanderthalensis, and 50,000 with Homo Sapiens.
Syllabic and alphabetical writing only came around 3,500 BCE for Homo Sapiens. There might have been older cases, but archaeology has not yet covered the whole world for all types of symbolic inscriptions that could have led to symbolic phonetic writing. The next stage was the printing press which enabled mass education and mass communication.
ENTRE IA & LES ÉCRANS LE THÉÄTRE EST EN QUESTION
The Journal “Théâtres du Monde” has just published its 34th issue. I have two articles published in that journal. So here is first of all the table of contents of the 2024 issue, and I added to these three pages all the preparatory work I have done to write the two articles that deal with the series HUNTERS and the author Lorraine HANSBERRY. These reviews and critiques are all bilingual, English for some and French for the others.
I do feel like a raisin the sun. I also added some documents on the recent question brought up about race in the USA where some states are restricting the teaching of slavery and Black history in the USA because it may, might, would, and I think SHOULD traumatize the poor white darlings who really need some traumatization about their imperialistic ideological terrorism.
Four films or series.
1- John Woo’s Silent Night (2023),
2- Doug Liman’s Road House (2024),
3- Albert Hughes’s The Continental (2023),
4- Marcela Saïd and Julien Despaux’s Ourika (2024),
all seen on Amazon’s Prime Video, hence distributed by Amazon Prime Video, all dealing with violence in our societies and all claiming that violence is justified top answer and respond to a violent society, a violence coming from outside our community, and that outside can introduce anti-immigrant accusations or plainly racist claims, both anti-white and anti-any-ethnicity.
Does it help us understand this violence ? Does these films enable us to devise a proper response to prevent and solve such violence? Both times, a resounding NO. But in both cases, it plays in the hands of the most extreme forces on the nationalist side of life, the side that refuses to consider those who are not pure according to their definitions as the cause of all our problems, and not only those people but also all products that may come from the countries concerned by these ethnic groups. This is true in the USA, in Canada, with Mexico playing the wide-open gate to the previous two, and all over Europe.
What game are these streaming services playing? Preparing coming elections! But it might go the wrong way for them. Now what is the wrong way? Good question. No answer because the ballot boxes will be the only valid answer. First stop, the European Elections in June 2024.
Mo Xiang’s third volume of the saga on The Blessing of a Heaven Official is there in front of me and this saga is emanating with so much force that no one can resist the tanha that tells them “Go For It! There is pleasure in it all!” I am sure you want to discover the pleasure there is in these volumes, but remember the authoress is a woman and as such she develops a sweet, soft, and catching psychology that will turn you completely berserk if you do not keep your feet well anchored in the earth.
The King Ghost Hua Cheng from Ghost City is behind every move the ascended Xie Lian is inspiring or is inspired by and for. His meeting this Xie Lian after 800 years of supernatural and surreal life in our vast cosmos was so mind-stirring, intelligence-moving, and body-inspiring that the pure ascetic Buddhist he is supposed to be, nearly fell into the cauldron of eroticism. He managed not to fall, but that was very close this time since he was unconscious and Hua Cheng took advantage of the situation and pretended that he had to save his “friend” before he drowned, though Hua Cheng knew perfectly well Xie Lian could not drown, hence cannot die. But, well, Hua Cheng kissed Xie Lian unconscious as he was, I mean in his unconscious mind, because Xie Lian was unconscious, and thus he could kiss him since he could not protest. What a twisted and I guess tortured mind he is. He should try Buddhist meditation to hypnotize himself into plain decent abstinence.
But sure enough, the encounter with the Venerable of Empty Words promises to be a fair adventure in which Xie Lian’s mind and body will be chastised, abused, and even probably raped. There will be quite a lot of repair work to do on the psyche and the conscious rightfulness of our Xie Lian. I guess Hua Cheng will take advantage of such situations to steal a couple more kisses. Never trust a ghost because they have no soul anymore and they have no honor either. So, lying, pretending, and even impersonating what they are not to seduce their gullible victims is some kind of sport for these fuzzy beings, if they can really BE.
Oppenheimer is an essential character in US history. He is the left-leaning Jew who provided the USA with the Atom Bomb that enabled the US to defeat Japan faster than the planned standard land and air attack by the Soviets and the Chinese Communists, officially endorsed in the Yalta Conference ( 4–11 February 1945) by Churchill, Truman, and Stalin. Truman did not have the atomic bomb yet and will only have it in July 1945. So, he bluffed and agreed with the Soviet plan because he had no alternative … yet. He reneged his agreement in July-August 1945, and he dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945. The victory over Germany was a joint effort. The victory over Japan was a self-centered and egotistic solitary procedure not even negotiated with the allies of the US. The United Kingdom might have been informed, maybe. But the USSR was not. The Americans were already and had been for nearly two centuries, on the “America First” and “Make America Great Forever” lines that we have known all along and directly since 1918.
And within 9 years Oppenheimer will be ostracized because he was leaning to the left and there were Communists around him. He submitted and disappeared in some sideline university job. He had nowhere to go, as opposed to Charlie Chaplin who went back to England. As a Jew, he could have gone to Israel, but that was not a real optimistic solution at the time. He might even have gone to the USSR with his communist wife. But he stayed put in the USA, in his closet-university-job. The film does not really explore this dilemma: hide away in the USA, go to the Jewish Israel, or go to the USSR. On one hand, it was his old depressive nature that came back. On the other hand, it would have been going back to his faith and his roots, even if it could have looked like treason. On the third hand, on yet another other hand, it would have been plain treason.
THE DESCENT TO HELL IN THREE STAGES – 2003-2015-2019
I brought together three films and series presented here both in English and French in anti-chronological order.
1- The film 7500, 2019.
2- The series Blindspot, 2015-2020.
3- The film The Dreamers, 2003
If you take them in this backward order, you may understand that today’s world is not at all different from the one in 1968 when the Vietnam War was going on full blast, the Chinese Cultural Revolution was in full swing and the West per se was living its first full sexual revolution with the arrival of the baby-boomers to the full unquenchable desire to hormonally and fully enjoy life. Have some interesting reading.
FIRST STAGE – AMAZON STUDIOS – 7500 – 2019
There is little to say about such a film. It is just artificial entertainment that shows nothing and proves nothing. It is all stressing detail to keep the audience glued to the screen.
SECOND STAGE – BLINDSPOT – FULL SERIES – FIVE SEASONS – 2015-2020
A very long series for very little apart from stressed and stressful situations that always end well anyway, meaning leading to a worse situation in the next episode.
THIRD STAGE – BERNARDO BERTOLUCCI – THE DREAMERS – 2003
Paris Spring 1968. We all know what happened then in France. The victory of the unions, the defeat of the left, and the impossibility for the left to understand that any “events” of that sort will always lead to the victory of the right in the next elections, and today we have to update the data and say the victory of the extreme right. It might be slightly more complex, but basically, that’s what it is and when the left wins this social-minded left will become conservative within at the most two years and it might even turn reactionary within these two years, at times even less. They like power so much.
Amazon Prime Video and Blumhouse Productions love dysfunctioning mothers who, in the name of their love for their children, are ready to kill anyone only on their gut feelings that this anyone is guilty of who knows what apart from the devil.
The film is tricky enough to lure and fool the audience, and the horror of the racist and dysfunctional situation can be believed till the end when the trick is revealed. Note this revelation implies that all daughters from divorced or motherless families are by definition, even by principle, liars.
You might also find the father falling in an ice-cold river under a blizzard of some sort funny, and with his winter coat on, and then he goes on parading around outside, in the unheated car, and even in some kind of social situation without changing his freezing clothes. Like at the Oscars yesterday the costume design Oscar was delivered to a costume designer wearing no clothes at all, except a small cardboard sign where sexually necessary for the picture, meaning that costume designers are so badly treated and paid that they cannot even afford to buy underwear.
A little bit more about the context, schools, religion, Islam and girls, divorced parents, single Muslim male parent, etc. would have maybe given some depth to the story and made it less artificial.
A film that wants to be science-fiction. So, learn the lessons that emerge from it.
1- Let black doctors or scientists get into a hospital “laboratory” and the most unimaginable horrors will take place.
2- Let black people be fully treated in a hospital and they will become guinea pigs, especially in the hands of black doctors.
3- Let a mother treat her son and the worst possible crime will take place under your own nose and in front of your own eyes.
4- Shall I go on?
If this is not pure racism laced with some sexism, I just wonder what would qualify. How can anyone imagine such man-made scientific schizophrenia to be possible in the hands and under the scalpel of a doctor, a scientist? I guess it is urgent to have clear regulations and controls on such activities. Because be sure that wild clandestine medical experiments are happening every day in the world.
Duration is all that plants and animals experience. They last as long as either possible or necessary. When the phylogenic target of bringing in the next generation of life is fulfilled, the plant or the animal can die or wither away. Homo Sapiens, and probably most Hominins developed from experience the need to measure this duration, at first in days and nights, and then in clusters of days and nights. Then they can coordinate their observations and notice some cosmic items go through regular existential cycles, first of all, the sun rising or lowering in the sky with shortening or lengthening days and nights. Second, the moon and its phases are numbered as two, four, or three, but systematically waxing and waning. You can easily measure all that in solar days and that is the beginning of time: a human invention quantifying the duration of anything in observable regular elements.
From what we know the Mayas were among the most advanced people for such time-quantification and they developed all sorts of calendars to do this. But they were neither the first one nor the last one. They were not the best either, though they were very good. I will even say that all the lines of dots or check marks or squares or other geometric forms we can find in all the caves in the world in which Hominins and Homo Sapiens lived and that they decorated in many ways are the quantification of various phenomena, though we don’t always know which ones.
This book by Hunbatz Men concentrates on Mayan calendars but in modern language and modern terms, not necessarily in the real Mayan terms at the time, up to 3,000 years ago. It assumes the Mayas were aware of the leap years, though we do not seem to have any real reason to believe so. The author does not work on any serious lunar hypothesis, maybe a calendar. It vaguely mentions but does not explore the Venus cycles as Morning Star and as Evening Star. To work on the Pleiades, why not, yet one question does not concern such a long cycle but the simple working of the ritualistic 260-day Tzolk’in Calendar that is out of sync with the solar calendar, the 365-day Haab Calendar, and even more so if we consider the 360-day Haab Calendar, and how the ritual activities dictated by the Tzolk’in Calendar can be prescribed and predicted and performed when their Tzolk’in dates can fall at any time, in any season in the Haab Calendar. It is hard enough to coordinate the 12-and-a-half moon cycles over a solar calendar, but many civilizations are dealing with it and managing it with cyclical corrections.
That’s why it would have been good to give us some elements on this very same problem with the Tzolk’in calendar when we can compare with the difficult adaptation of the Muslim Lunar ritualistic calendar to the Gregorian calendar. The floating Ramadan is the result of this necessary adaptation. In other words, the present book is slightly short.
To bring together South Africa in the days of apartheid and from the point of view of the white Afrikaners with the tremendous career of Queen with Freddie Mercury and after his death without him shows how ahead of their times this band was when they started as a boys’ band and then when they matured into a full-fledged career.
Apartheid and racism bring segregation and discrimination which systematically reject differences. No future for those who do not have the skin color, the religion, the language, the sexuality, the musical affiliation, even as a simple audience, as the dominant, selected, elected, chosen entity that only has god and science over their heads. And their God has chosen these people to be his chosen people, and these people chosen by God believe what God has explained to them that science justifies their elected-ness, selected-ness or chosen-ness. They are the acme of the creation, and all others are just plain rejects that no one has the heart to destroy.
But be sure God will do it some day. Which god since there are many if not even plenty? Who cares. Each God will recognize his own supporters when they are all dead.
But then you may have no supporters at all, dear God or Gods. It does not really matter. We don’t need these supporters to eat, drink and survive. We have all we need in heaven and the sky. In fact, it was a mistake of ours to have created humanity. The planet would be so much better with none of the human parasites.
Meet the Madman Prophet, who is most the time mixed up with the other God Profit who is universal and derails every so many years, not so many as you may think every ten years or so. But with this God there is always a small population that manages to store away what they need to take over when the crisis has come to an end and the dead victims have been buried or cremated.
An interesting experiment to bring a poetry workshop in a prison For us who have lived in the mythology of Johnny Cash and San Quentin, and all his songs and work about and in prisons there is nothing strange about that But what happens afterward? The inmates get some satisfaction in their work, writing poetry and singing, slam or whatever it may be, but what’s next after their prison term? No reason to reject the experiment but a follow-up action is necessary to know what these men – and it is only men – have become or will become when they get out of the railings, out of the cage. We are not all Johnny Cash, are we?
Since this operation was sponsored by Alliance Française, it would nice to know what kind of follow-up work this Alliance Française is going to perform. The responsibility cannot be the poet’s. But it is interesting to be confirmed one more time that there are many ways for prison inmates to reform. One element is not taken into account. 98% of the population is Sunni Muslims. What is the impact on such an experiment? What does Islam bring to the experiment that would otherwise not be there. Étienne Russias should try to show us this dimension, since, as far as I know, he is a standard young man educated in the Christian traditions, maybe not the religion, but the traditions definitely like being christened, being buried religiously, being married religiously. How did he deal with a 98 percent Muslim group? How many Muslims were taking part, among the inmates and among the workshop workers?
But that’s the beginning of the intelligent globalization we need, a globalization that is founded on differences and not some westernized homogenization.
(No French Translation) The Incas partly inherited and partly developed phenomenal agriculture in the very hard conditions of the Andes: desertic areas, difficult water resources, high altitude, no real draft animal, no wheel, and yet the Andes before and under the Incas produced miraculous results that the Spaniards destroyed in a few years with epidemics and mass killing.
It is easy to say the Incas were barbarians and that covers the genocide, the culturicide, the systematic uprooting and exposing of anything they could have believed or done, based on NO direct contact with them before the “conquest” that must have killed 50% of the population in two or three years with smallpox and other infantile and childhood diseases, plus a few sword killings when there was some resistance.
Unluckily, Gordon McEwan does not really come to a clear vision in his book because he only bases his work on what has been collected by others essentially on the only source of some Spanish colonizers trying to justify the massacre and apocalyptic colonization. The real barbarians were the colonizers, and it is their testimony that is nearly only taken into account. Archaeology is about one century behind what it is in other regions of the world.
Things have slightly changed over the last ten years, but we are still a long way behind what we should have done. That leaves the door open to some like Hunbatz Men pretending the Mayas, Incas and many other Indigenous Native Americans are the descendants of the humanoid people who were established in two continents that have disappeared without leaving any trace of their existence behind them, Mu and Atlantis. And then it is easy to bring in that the inhabitants of these two disappeared continents were extra-humans from some distant civilization who landed on earth and prospered and then found some humanoid animals there and civilized them. We are their descendants, I mean of these extra-humanly civilized humanoid animals from long ago.
Maybe we could simply ask some questions about the origins of the Incas, the Mayas, and many other native American peoples of South and Meso-America. We know the Native Americans of North America and Canada up to Greenland came from Siberia. But that solution is not, feasible for the Native Americans of South and Meso-America. But we are so mentally colonized by North American Protestant Puritans who believe they are the center of the world that research about South America and Mesoamerica has scandalously been neglected. Some mental colonization of this type is also a genocide since it excludes millions of people from what these North American WASPs call the “human race” which is of course white, etc.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
4. Psychology
Research
Volume 13, Number 10, October 2023 (Serial Number 148)
Contents
300,000 (at Least) Years for Homo Sapiens to Develop Writing: A Review of
Silvia Ferrara’s The Greatest Invention, Tr. Todd Portnowitz 443
Jacques Coulardeau
Corporate Social Responsibility Perception and Happiness of Employees:
Evidence From Disney Resort in China 469
TSAI Meng-ying, HSU Wan-chi, WANG En-tong
How Does the Film Raise the Red Lantern Explore the Oppression of Women
by the Patriarchal Society in China 476
Yuekun Cui
Internationalization of Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review of the
UK Outward Student Mobility 484
GUO Yuxin
Power and Politics: The Psychology of Gender 494
Lipi Mukhopadhyay
Antonioni’s Films Studies From the Perspective of Existentialism 501
WU Liuming
On Multimodal Criticism of The Kitchen God’s Wife 506
JIA Xiaoqing
5. Psychology Research, October 2023, Vol. 13, No. 10, 443-468
doi:10.17265/2159-5542/2023.10.001
300,000 (at Least) Years for Homo Sapiens to Develop Writing:
A Review of Silvia Ferrara’s The Greatest Invention,
Tr. Todd Portnowitz
Jacques Coulardeau
UniversitéParis 1 Panthé
on Sorbonne, Paris, France
The author centers on writing seen both as a human ability and a transcription of oral language, and yet she very
heavily refuses there to be any continuity from oral to written language, though once or twice what she says, like in
her fifth step about “assigning sounds to signs”, is exactly the reverse of what Homo Sapiens did when he developed
writing: he assigned signs to sounds. No matter what way it works for a decipherer, and for Homo Sapiens when he
developed some writing system for his/her/their language, and his/her/their language alone in 6-8,000 BCE, the
connection between an oral language and its written version is connected, but flexible so that it can be easily replaced
by another written code for the very same oral utterances, like the Phoenicians developing the first real consonantal
alphabet to replace, for Semitic languages, the Cuneiform writing of the Sumerians (Indo-Iranian) and Akkadians
(Semitic), and later on the Greeks adding the vowels of Indo-European languages to the Phoenician alphabet that
only had “alep” and only when it was the initial sound or letter of a word. She alludes to signs in painted caves, hence
going back to 45,000 BCE, and all over the world, but she does not exploit it. She acknowledges there were six
cradles in the world and does not give them in chronological order, hence does not link them to the general evolution
of the concerned human groups, and she neglects the fact that Egyptian writing and Sumerian writing developed at
the same time or so but with a strong link between them: the Akkadians were the scribes of the Sumerians and they
were Semitic like the Egyptians, whereas the Sumerians were Indo-Iranian coming down from the Iranian Plateau
and settling in Mesopotamia before moving on. She mistakenly declares them Turkic, or speaking Turkish, an
agglutinative language. Mutations selected naturally transformed the foot, the larynx, the respiratory system, the
articulatory system, the subglottal zone, and its innervation of the pre-Sapiens Hominins concerned to enable Homo
Sapiens to become what they are, long-distance bipedal fast runners. The development of oral language is a collateral
consequence of these mutations. As soon as Homo Sapiens started using durable medium for their representational
and entoptic geometric or other diacritic elements we have to follow Genevieve von Petzinger and state that these are
signs and they have a function, counting for the repetitive elements, and all of these rockface paintings were there to
illustrate the story the painters or other special individuals (probably sha-women and a few shamans) who could
speak to the spirits behind the rockface were telling the fascinated audience. The lack of phylogeny blocks the real
vision necessary to understand these facts and the fact that the reference to “bureaucracy” in big cities was the cause
of this development, according to Silvia Ferrara. The people who specialized in remembering data, could we call
them a bureaucracy in 2023, with the highly pejorative paradigmatic meaning the term conveys? Of course not. Where
Jacques Coulardeau, Ph.D., Visiting Lecturer, Foreign Languages Department, UniversitéParis 1 Panthé
on Sorbonne, Paris,
France.
DA
VID PUBLISHING
D
6. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
444
did the people who developed some writing system come from? What language or languages did they speak? Writing
was not a discovery because it was not found on a tree or in a cave. Human writing was not an invention because
there is no break from pure oral language to written language via representational drawings, and iconic first, totally
abstract then signs used to transcribe the oral language into a durable (the media) and sustainable (to be learned by
anyone and taught to anyone) script. We have to take the high road leading to discovering the phylogeny of language
starting in 475,000 BCE and still developing.
Keywords: linguistic phylogeny, anthropology, archaeology, Mayan glyphs, Sumerian cuneiforms
Introduction
The conversational tone is not the best to make a scientific presentation. But it is possible to overlook this
familiarity though it tends to make things simple or direct that are not easy nor straightforward.
It is tempting to consider the various writing systems that archaeology has brought to us from the past and
decide to say they were invented by people, or they were born from a certain environment and at the very same
time consider that it has to be taken within itself. A writing system, in the author’s approach, is not the result of
a long phylogenic process that led, starting from the development of articulated language around 300,000 BCE,
to the development of writing sometime after the Peak of the Ice Age at 19,000 BCE. She alludes to the famous
cave paintings all over the world that go back to 50,000-45,000 BCE and quotes Geneviè
ve von Petzinger’s The
First Signs: Unlocking the Mysteries of the World’s Oldest Symbols (2016), but she does not introduce the term
entoptic which is essential there to explain the basic geometric forms used as simple signs or symbols or simply
marks on the walls of the caves. Where does a perfect circle or a perfect triangle or a perfect square, or even at
times not so perfect, come from when you know that these geometric forms are not served to Homo Sapiens from
300,000 BCE to, let’s say, 19,000 BCE on a plate, ready-made to use, to borrow, to imitate.
In the same way as the hashtag pattern that is found on blocks of ochre in that period, and some wonder
whether Neanderthals did the same, as for Denisovans we do not know, these blocks being associated with burials,
are not mentioned at all. Of course, she should have wondered about the tools and weapons, and even more about
the beads, perforated shells strung on some rope of some sort, the oldest ever found were in Morocco going back
precisely to 300,000 BCE. Those are symbolic items that require some mental construction before producing
them, and perforating these small shells from some oceanic shellfish is not an easy task and it requires a tool, and
some skill, and practice.
Lunar or Menstrual Cycles: The Need to Record Data
She also should have wondered about the meaning of the various wooden, bone, or stone artifacts going
back to cave-dwelling marked with all sorts of notches on them that Alexander Marshack studied a long time ago
discovering they revealed some about 28-notch cycles he considered being lunar cycles and I consider being
menstrual cycles. These marks made with different mark-making implements are divided by Marshack in smaller
groups, often around six-seven-eight marks giving the four phases of the moon, though it is tentative to believe
Homo Sapiens had already reached this abstract reconstruction of the lunar cycle, and was not still on the three-
phase approach, a 12-day waxing phase, the four-day full moon, a 12-day waning phase, and the hardly one-day
no-moon-at-all transition to a new moon cycle. But some of the artifacts cover four, five, or up to nine or so
cycles, then the subgroups in a single cycle might reveal the important phases in the menstrual cycle for an about-
7. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 445
28-day-short cycle, a nine-day waxing phase to the four-five-day fertility period, and then a nine-day waning
phase with the three-five-day menstrual period. Note that is essential to know precisely when the woman is fertile
and can be impregnated with certainty, and for longer sequences of notches, it could indicate the important stages
of the pregnancy beyond the menstrual cycle, up to four of these cycles (problem of “natural abortion or
miscarriage”) or beyond till nine cycles to reach birth. All that is both the real recording of some observed
phenomena, and it may be symbolic or indicative of a mental elaboration beyond this observation. Such artifacts
are “writing” the results of observation in order to control and use these natural cycles that are essential for the
survival and expansion of the community and the species. That’s where the book is frankly deficient: it does not
give us any indexes, as if the author did not know that indexes are the easy way to navigate in a book, even, after
reading it from cover to cover. Indexes are the easier way for a reader to survive reading a book, and work on his
reading afterward
The need to record on some durable medium or media these lunar or menstrual-period-and-pregnancy
observations is the obvious expression of the need to have a recording system, and that recording system will be
writing because, apart from these recording artifacts, the community is discussing all these phenomena probably
abundantly, and a “memory-person” is keeping it all in his or her memory which is not as durable as a stone, but
what it has memorized can be transmitted to someone else who will keep it recorded in their own minds. This
dimension requires a good and well-trained memory in the mind of the memory-person (called “Rsi” in Indo-
European, or “griot” in many places in Black Africa, or “trained priests or priestesses” among Native Americans
such as Pocahontas).
Phylogenic Continuity
The principle of some kind of total cut between the oral practice and development of language and languages
on one hand, and the development of some recording system, any recording system at first, like the cuneiform
marks on the 6,000-BCE-old tablets in Le Louvres, Paris, which were found in Romania, 3,000 years older than
the writing system of Sumerian and the Sumerians. The clay tablet and the stylus were used at first to keep records
of the commercial proceeds of the merchants that the Sumerians were, with simple marks for counting and some
more elaborate glyphs to record the nature of the goods being counted. Silvia Ferrara does not consider such facts.
She does not realize that when she discusses the difficulty of adapting cuneiform writing developed for Sumerian
to Akkadian and other Semitic hence tri-consonantal languages, it is the proof that the writing system was
developed for Sumerian, a synthetic-analytical Indo-Iranian language she wrongly assimilates to Turkish, hence
to agglutinative languages.
Semitic languages are based on consonants for the semantic construction of the architecture of the sentence
but reinforced and specified categorially and functionally by the use of vowels that are reduced to diacritic signs,
or nothing at all in some cases. Therefore, the oral language is a semantic consonantal-root architecture
supplemented with discursive vowels (producing syllables normally going in groups of three) which was introduced
into the utterances the syntax of the communicational situation, which is necessarily discursive, exterior, and of
course linguistically oral. The writing system of Sumerian was developed for Sumerian, but it could be used for
Semitic languages—and by the way, it could be used a lot more easily for Turkic or Indo-European languages
since Turkic, Indo-European, Indo-Iranian, and Indo-Aryan languages are from the same third-articulation
development—provided it was somewhat modified. In the same way, any writing system can be transliterated into
the Latin alphabet, provided some diacritic signs are added, and even some extra letters are invented, to cover special
8. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
446
sounds of this or that language. You can check this fact with word by opening their “special symbols” extension
that provides a vast survey of various Latin alphabets modified to cover many languages.
Figure 1. Two approaches showing the evolution of phonetic symbols, and the emergence of cuneiform writing.
To conclude on this point, I was surprised, concerning Sumerian and cuneiform writing, that Silvia Ferrara
did not try to continue what RenéLabat and Florence Malbran-Labat started in their Manuel d'é
pigraphie akkadienne:
Signes-Syllabaire-Idé
ogrammes (2002) who tried to find some architecture or logic in the use of the stylus to
produce the composite signs corresponding to oral words from very simple to more complex with some sort of
composition of the simple signs into some syllabary phonetic logic in Sumerian, though this book’s covering
simultaneously Sumerian and Akkadian made it difficult to capture the subtleties since the phonetic architecture
of Akkadian is based on consonantal langue-roots in phylogenic development and it is only vocalic in using
discursive categorial and functional marks, and meaning-specifying both paradigmatic and syntagmatic
references. This writing system seems to have no representational dimension since each sign is composed of
various marks from the stylus organized in an original compound or composite glyph. But Silvia Ferrara should
have discussed this long process to reach that point. We do have some data on the subject, such as in the first table
above integrated into the article on the topic in Encyclopedia Britannica, “Cuneiform, writing system”, written
9. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 447
by Jaan Puhvel, Emeritus Professor of Classics and Indo-European Studies, University of California, Los Angeles,
fact-checked by the Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, 1 January 2023, https://www.britannica.com/topic/cuneiform.
Or she could have used the second table above available at http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ling201/writingsystems/
sumeriancuneiform.htm). In both cases, we have some examples of how glyphs changed over time from some
kind of representational drawings or icons to produce the cuneiform signs we know today which do not look like
what they were derived from looked like. Note the attempt to reveal a Cartesian architecture1
in this writing
system by RenéLabat and his daughter should be examined seriously. But one thing is sure here: this writing
system can cover many words that are reduced to one vowel, and four vowels are thus used as autonomous words,
which is in total contradiction with Semitic languages. These Sumerian vowels are thus part of langue2
whereas
in Semitic languages they are only discursive diacritic elements added to the consonants when a word or a text is
uttered or written. They represent the communicational syntax that comes from the communicational situation
that imposes itself at various levels of depth into the human language over time (remember from at least 300,000
BCE), and this integration is the very basis on which the three articulations of human language and languages
can be identified.
RenéLabat and Cuneiform Sumerian
I have to provide a simple note on RenéLabat’s book. His Liste des Signes (List of signs) starts with one
single horizontal left-to-right impression of the stylus as an opening mark for a complex glyph, and he then
complicates this initial (on the left) mark by increasing the number to two, three, four, though he runs into some
fuzzy ordering which does not seem to be hierarchical all the time (from simple to more complex) with what
follows these opening marks. This is RenéLabat’s classification. We do not know if this Cartesian presentation
was in any way what the Sumerians, and later the Akkadians intended, or what the phylogeny of this language
was able to produce. That approach provides RenéLabat with 475 signs. Then he shifts to a single vertical stylus
impression, head upward, and that provides, by complexification of this opening vertical impression, the signs
from 480 to 598e. But it is then not that clear in the long section of the “Syllabaire et Idé
ogrammes” (Syllabary
and Ideograms) section, each double page of this section being vertically subdivided in parallel approaches, on
the left page the “Évolution des Signes” (Evolution of the Signs) and on the right page the “Valeurs phoné
tiques
et idé
ographiques des signes” (Phonetic and Ideographic Values of the Signs). Here are some visuals of the left
and right pages, first the matrix of the left page and then that of the right page with the specifications necessary
to identify all columns in both pages.
The left page, here page 40, is divided into five columns: I: the oldest (known of course by RenéLabat)
form of the sign; II: Evolution of the sign in Classical Sumerian; III: Evolution of the sign in Akkadian. A-IIIα-
β-γ-Evolution of the sign in Assyrian: (α) Old Assyrian, (β) Middle Assyrian, (γ) Neo Assyrian. B-IIIa-b-c-
Evolution of the sign in Babylonian: (a) Old Babylonian, (b) Middle Babylonian, (c) Neo Babylonian. Now the
right page.
1
“In Part II of Discourse on Method (1637), Descartes offers the first and only published exposéof his method. […] [T]he method
described in Discourse II consists of only four rules: […] The third, to direct my thoughts in an orderly manner, by beginning
with the simplest and most easily known objects in order to ascend little by little, step by step, to knowledge of the most complex,
and by supposing some order even among objects that have no natural order of precedence. […]” in Dika, Tarek R., “Descartes’
Method”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.),
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/descartes-method/.
2
I use “langue” with Saussure’s meaning as opposed to “parole”, a pair of concept often reduced today to “langue-discours” and
in English the pair becomes “langue-discourse”.
10. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
448
Figure 2. Specification of the columns of the section “Évolution des signes, Syllabaire et Idéogrammes” (Pages 39-247)
of “Manuel d’Épigraphie akkadienne” by René Labat and Florence Malibran-Labat.
The right page, here page 41, is divided into four columns: I: The Sign; II: Phonetic Values of the Sign; III:
Dates and Geographical Areas of each of these values; IV: Ideographic Values of the Sign.
To show the complexity of Labat’s work (Note the book is entirely, apart from the sections added to it by
RenéLabat’s daughter, hand-written) let me give you the entry concerned by the first sign we are going to
exemplify in a minute, and which is the sign Number ONE in RenéLabat’s book. To appreciate the value of this
work, we need to understand all the abbreviations and all the references RenéLabat uses in his entries. It is not
easy to work on this book because it does not have an index of the French meanings, hence we cannot search the
book from this side of the research, the language of the reader (French in the case of RenéLabat). It has a list of
all signs (pages 29-32), plus a list of Babylonian signs (pages 33-37), but with only the number of the signs (given
by RenéLabat himself) in the main section of the book. Florence Malbran-Labat apparently (it is typed) added
an alphabetical list of all the Sumerian words concerned in their Latin transcription, and this index only gives the
number of the sign that is found at the end of the fourth column section of the word concerned, in the bottom
right corner. In the example given below, the number of the sign is one. There are numbers in the second column
of the right page, but they are not used in the index of Sumerian words. The fact that in the entry below the
number in the second column of the right page is one is purely circumstantial.
11. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 449
Figure 3. First entry of the Manual with a single horizontal stylus impression.
Exploratory Note on Cuneiform Sumerian
Now we can consider the architecture of the cuneiform script. On the first right page (page 43) of this section,
the first sign considered is the single horizontal stylus impression meaning “on” or “alone”, and we have to jump
to page 213 to start considering the signs starting with vertical stylus impressions, the single vertical impression
being the “unity”, i.e., “one” (flexibly expanded semantically). Just to show how this complexification is based
on the sole stylus impressions (whole length or only the head), here below are a few cuneiform words in Sumerian.
The word numbers are those given by RenéLabat but Thompson’s initiative of numbering the Maya glyphs with
an initial T for Thompson has not been used by Labat in Sumerian.
“word” number 1, Phonetic /aš/, meaning “one”, “alone”.
“word” number 480, Phonetic /diš/, meaning “one”, “Determinative preceding proper names”, “Mark
opening a paragraph or sentence”.
12. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
450
“word” number 570, Phonetic /šina/, meaning “two”, “postposed dual determinative”, “repetition sign”.
Given by some as a short form for “father”.
“word” number 579, Phonetic /a:/, meaning “water”. Let’s consider this word that is central in
Sumerian. The word is only transcribed as the vowel /a/ whose basic meaning is “water”. I would like to give
this example of how the cuneiform writing system works. We must remember we are dealing with a civilization
that developed in Mesopotamia, particularly in the very well-irrigated plains crossed by two rivers, the Tigris-
Euphrates river system. Water is essential due to the climate. Water is also essential due to the fact we are well
advanced in the thawing of the Ice Age’s ices and the water has already risen a lot, but the thawing is still going
on and the water is still rising. In Mesopotamia managing water was essential and they invented and developed
systems with dikes, dams, water canals, etc. A-water: “A” has the basic meaning “water”. As extensions of this
meaning, it can also mean a watercourse or any kind of fluid. In particular, it can also mean “semen” or “seed”,
and by extension of that, it can mean “offspring, child”, or even sometimes “father”. “A” is pronounced /a:/ (like
the first vowel in father), and it looks like this , the cuneiform sign for /a/ which is a Sumerogram, i.e., the
use of a Sumerian cuneiform character or group of characters as an ideogram or logogram rather than a
syllabogram in the graphic transcription of a language other than Sumerian, such as Akkadian (a Semitic
language), Eblaite (another Semitic language from Northern Syria), or Hittite (an Indo-European language from
Anatolia): the Sumerogram can cover any phonetic “word” in these languages meaning water or something
connected with water, like for example in Akkadian the word “mu” for “water”. Let’s widen the categorial
approach of the word A-water. Noun means water; watercourse, canal; seminal fluid; offspring; father; tears;
flood. Interjection means alas! Preposition, locative suffix means where; in; when; and denotes movement
towards or in favor of a person. Definite article, a nominalizing suffix for a noun or noun clause, denotes “the”.
I am following the phrasing of my various sources. Linguistically I do not agree with this last remark. This suffix
denotes that a noun or noun phrase is specified in definite extension, which would be rendered in English by the
definite article “the”. As for this category, definite extension, Sumerian is more advanced than many other
languages, including some Indo-European languages, that do not have definite or indefinite articles. However,
the “definite article” has not yet been extracted from the noun itself and used in front of the noun. It is in the
process of being extracted, which makes me think this language is a synthetic third-articulation language.
“word” listed at the very end of the entry of “word” number 579 by RenéLabat on page 239 but
without any specification on the meaning. Check https://glosbe.com/en/sux/father, meaning: “father” with a
phonetic value like /aiia/, the two phonetic sounds /a:/ are connected with a wet vowel /i/ therefore /j/ in the
International Phonetic Alphabet, pronounced like the /y/ letter in “year”.
More About “Father” in Cuneiform Sumerian
A more generic word for “father” is possible.
“word” from https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%F0%92%80%8A%F0%92%81%80, means:
“old person”, “witness”, “father”, “elder”, “official”, “an official”. I have noticed that Sumerian is rewritten “in
13. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 451
modern times” (?) more phonetically based on the syllabic principle: the word is “ab-ba”, the first glyph being
“ab” (“father” Number 128) and the second “ba”. The two together “ab-ba” reinforce the meaning of the first
element by reinforcing the consonant /b/ and then mean “elder” or “old man”. Note this looks like the way Maya
composite glyphs are transliterated. Does it mean that for the Sumerians five thousand years ago, it worked like
that, the glyphs being arranged on a horizontal line, mostly from left to right?
But I have shown enough how the writing system itself, reduced to impressions of the stylus mostly
horizontal from left to right or from right to left, and vertical head on up or down, plus a few possibilities slanting
one way or another, and the impression, of the head of the stylus itself. That is so abstract that the referential
representation that could be behind seems to be very far away from the mind of the writer or reader. The
connection becomes purely semantic, paradigmatically and syntagmatically, to quote the two dimensions of the
semantic value of any linguistic utterance, according to Ferdinand de Saussure. We can imagine there is a
hierarchy in the composition and a complexification in tiers of combinations.
Let me consider one last composition of these Sumerian glyphs and the meaning of water and father behind
them. The writing style (from https://glosbe.com/) is slightly different from RenéLabat’s.
“word” combining three elements. , /a/ water. /ab-ba/ /abak/, “of the
sea”). /a-ab-ba/ /a'abak/, “seawater”, “sea”. The first element, word 579 /a/, is classifying as
regards the second double element. We can then suggest that in this case, the classifying element is anteposed.
This is a way to classify one element, the second which means “of the sea”, into a different meaning, this time
“sea”. The first element /a/ is dropped because the third element classifies the second. The meaning of the second
element then becomes “old person”,·
“witness”,·
“father”,·
“elder”,·
“official”,·
“an official”, and is thus reinforced
by the embedded third element, the word 339 “áš”, , see below. The word 339 is embedded into the word
128 “ab” to produce this composite glyph, , listed by Labat within the sign 128 “ab” as being the
word “ab.áš” meaning “witness”. All such considerations are far from being final and a lot more research has to
be done, but fundamentally from and in a phylogenic perspective.
Figure 4. René Labat, 1988, Character 339, áš.
14. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
452
Handicapped by the Lack of Linguistic Phylogeny
A lot more could be said, but that is not Silvia Ferrara’s approach. She does not give the fundamental
linguistic elements that could help us to understand how writing was developed ALL OVER THE WORLD as a
continuation of what Homo Sapiens had been doing in caves ALL OVER THE WORLD since at least 45,000
BCE, which reveals the conceptual and symbolic mind of Homo Sapiens, first of all developed in language
(starting around at least 300,000 BCE), then in body decorations like beads (the oldest in Morocco are from
300,000 BCE)3
, then, little by little expanding this symbolical, meaningful, and signifying practices into things
that survived time, long before writing was developed from these symbolical activities. Neither discovered
because it did not come along on some tree, or in some cave, nor really invented because without the language
behind it, you cannot understand the transition between mental (for a long time) representations, then
unsustainable representations on non-durable media (for a long time too) and finally the jump into the use of
durable media to carry the representations Homo Sapiens finally entrusted to these media. These representations
were the extensions of many and all different Homo Sapiens’s mental, linguistic, probably vastly discussed and
debated visual representations with some oral accompaniment like incantations, rites, rituals, songs of all sorts,
and oration from those who had the skill and the authority to produce a formal oration on what was being
represented. This is so obvious, and vastly studied by archaeologists and anthropologists, that I am surprised this
is not studied, or explored by the author here.
I wanted to show in this case of Sumerian cuneiforms that the script itself may have its own architectural
morphology and even phylogeny, but it all started from various “representations” of “referential objects”
abstracted into a line, or form and then into a formal script that has little to do with the form of the referential
items but has all to do with the oral word behind. There is a shift from representing the referential item to
abstracting a script that is then only directly attached to the oral form corresponding to the referential item because
the word existed even before writing it down came to the mind of the concerned people, which is why some
civilizations never developed on their own a writing system, though they all had and have the proper and
necessary oral words, and the concepts that reside in these words, to express themselves and the most abstract
rules, poetry, literature, and technological or scientific reality they are living in. But that is going to be my next
point. Yet it has to be clear that for me the book is essential because it contains many other themes that should
create or inspire discussions and debates.
Writing: The Extension of Orality (Marshall McLuhan)
My general idea or even principle comes from Marshal McLuhan for whom any invention of any sort, all
seen as material or mental media (and there probably is always a mental medium behind or under the material
medium you can see or touch), is an extension of man himself. Language itself is an extension of some mutations
in Homo Sapiens that were naturally selected to enable man to run bipedally fast and over long distances. The
3
“Waterlogged deposits at the archaeological site of Kalambo Falls, Zambia, dated by luminescence to at least 476 ± 23 kyr ago
(ka), preserved two interlocking logs joined transversely by an intentionally cut notch. This construction has no known parallels in
the African or Eurasian Palaeolithic. The earliest known wood artefact is a fragment of polished plank from the Acheulean site of
Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel, more than 780 ka (refs. 2, 3). Wooden tools for foraging and hunting appear 400 ka in Europe 4-8,
China9 and possibly Africa10. At Kalambo we also recovered four wood tools from 390 ka to 324 ka, including a wedge, digging
stick, cut log and notched branch.” Barham, L., Duller, G. A. T., Candy, I., et al. Evidence for the earliest structural use of wood at
least 476,000 years ago. Nature (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06557-9. Should we push the beginning of Homo
Sapiens from 300,000 BCE to 475,000 BCE?
15. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 453
mutations have all to do with the larynx, the subglottal area, the articulatory apparatus, the sinuses, and the
respiratory system (by the way the architecture of the foot was completely and irreversibly transformed, and this
mutation has little to do with language). These mutations enabled Homo Sapiens to articulate four or more,
eventually between six and ten, vowels without which language is not possible since consonants need vowels to
be uttered, even the famous /schwa/ blank vowel as a default minimal vowel: an unstressed mid-central vowel
(such as the usual sound of the first and last vowels of the English word America) represented by the symbol /ə/
(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/schwa). In the same way, these mutations enabled Homo Sapiens
to articulate 20 or more consonants (without forgetting the clicks). And we have to add intonation that depends,
for longer utterances, on a deep larynx and the breath that can fuel the production of such longer utterances. Like
any child, or even infant, Homo Sapiens’ newly developed physiological tools for his long distance bipedal fast
running enabled Homo Sapiens to discover that he could diversify his vocal production and play with it, and
these vocal collateral effects became tools, when not running, enabling him to play with his vocal production.
Articulated language became a reality as soon as some individuals, in fact, most of them or all of them because
a game, like all games, is catching, started playing with their new tools and discovered that the consonants can
only be uttered with the help of vowels because they could only utter vowels alone or syllables and that they
could rotate the vowels and the consonants to produce all sorts of syllables, words, compositions. For a linguist,
consonants and vowels are basic elements, but for Homo Sapiens 300,000 years ago, playing with them vocally,
what was most important was the syllable. Homo Sapiens had that in common with the various apes who have
calls produced by associating consonantal and vocalic elements on the patterns CV, CVC, VCV, or VC, but a lot
less than Homo Sapiens because they had fewer vowels and fewer consonants, and they did not and still do not
dominate the rotation of them. In fact, we could say Homo Sapiens is the only language-developing mammal,
and he is the only articulated-language-developing Hominin. And that would not have been possible if Homo
Sapiens had not developed his mind which is the virtual part of the mental competence of Homo Sapiens, and
this mind could not develop without language which could not develop without a few characteristics of the brain
that, when implemented in coordination with language, produced the mind, a virtual reality dimension of Homo
Sapiens and the very engine of his phylogeny as a species, after he had developed his bipedal, long-distance, fast
running. That was the first stage on the road to abstraction and symbolicity, a long time before the envy to record
anything on any durable medium could be born in this Human mind in full development.
Mind-Language: The Phylogenic Virtual Reality Engine of Homo Sapiens
We have to understand that writing is the extension of the hand that holds the stylus, pen, or keyboard; the
extension of the eye that negotiates the movements of the hand to produce the glyphs; the extension of the ear
since it transcribes some oral sounds, some oral language into some visual material glyphs. But that is only the
end of the process that produces a writing system. I want to insist here on what comes before, what will eventually
deliver writing, a writing system, and the glyphs of this writing system.
Man is a dominant visual being. Silvia Ferrara is right on this point. But she is wrong too because the fetus
had been able to hear since the 24th week of the pregnancy, 16 weeks before delivery. Hearing enabled the fetus,
the child-to-be, to record clusters of sounds in the language of the mother and the language of the people around
her. We must keep in mind all Hominins before Homo Sapiens were more developed than the apes they inherited
a lot from and among others their communication that was based on calls. Pre-Sapiens Hominins had developed
their communication but certainly not to a Sapiens level. The mutations in Homo Sapiens we have already
16. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
454
mentioned were not there yet, maybe some slow and partial evolution, maybe a slightly deeper larynx, maybe
changes in the articulatory and respiratory systems, but yet not as much as Homo Sapiens. None of these pre-
Sapiens Hominins were long distance, fast, bipedal runners, none of them had Homo Sapiens’ foot that mutated
to be fit for this type of running. But they had a communication procedure and system partly based on calls,
probably numerous calls with maybe a beginning of referential attachment to some items in the surrounding
environment. If we jump a few thousand years and reach 295,000 BCE (and do not forget the recent discovery
of worked-upon “beams” in Zambia that were dated around 475,000 BCE, which might justify the pushing-back
of the big mutations to that a lot more distant date), Homo Sapiens was Homo Sapiens and the mutations we are
speaking of had taken place, were taking place. He was able to produce a fair number of vowels (four to six,
maybe eight with some variants on one or two vowels, opening and closing just like for the French sound /e/, /é
/,
and /è
/), and a good number of consonants, probably more than a dozen and getting close to 20. Around the
mother in those distant eras, a lot was being orally produced the fetus in his mother’s womb could hear.
The fetus in the womb of his/her mother captured repetitive clusters of sounds and it was proved in Roubaix
Maternity in the 1980s by doctors who recorded the intra-uterine reception of outside sounds and talking of
pregnant mothers, and then checked during the hours following birth that the child was able to react to the names
of brothers and sisters (eye reaction mainly). Since the mothers who volunteered for this experiment were
Maghreban and they had many children, at least three or four, and their names had been recorded by the fetus.
The fetus can also discriminate the direction from where the sounds come, from inside the mother, from outside,
left right, front, and back, for the fetus of course. That will be very useful after birth, and there again, it is easy
to check the child, the newborn can place what someone tells him or her by turning his/her head or eyes to the
spatial source of the sounds, of the words. So, even before birth, the human child can discriminate clusters of
sounds. Note this is not unique to human children or fetuses. Many other species have the ability to register and
recognize some clusters of sounds, the names they have been given by their masters for example, the names of
cows, the names of cats, and the names of dogs. That’s where the extension of man (and not only man) starts.
The point here is to know when the fetuses of the animals I have just mentioned can hear.
We can now consider the six stages between the initial more or less sonorous data bank of the fetus before
the 24th week of his or her mother’s pregnancy to the moment when the child can write down his first words,
probably between five and seven.
Discriminating
To discriminate a cluster of sounds (before birth even) and to memorize them in the brain in what I would
call Brain-Machine-Code, many animals can do that, at times smells (like dogs), sounds (like cats), ground
vibrations (like many ground-bonded animals like snakes or lizards), and a combination of smells, sounds, and
ground vibrations (like elephants and most wild animals of the vast cat family). I have seen a whole family of
boars (parents and kids) scampering away from a path in the jungle in Sigiriya, Sri Lanka, when I was about a
good 50 meters away. I was walking on the path and watching them. So, they could feel the vibrations in the
ground, they could eventually hear my various noisy productions, and they could smell my hormones (and they
did not smell the hormone of fear, otherwise the adult boars would have attacked to protect the kids because
someone who smells like fear is someone who is going to attack: attacking is the best protection against what
you fear). We must not forget we are mammals and members of the animal world, even if we have lost many of
these sensory capabilities. It is exactly the same thing in the visual field, after birth of course. The newborn can
17. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 455
discriminate light and darkness, moving or motionless shapes, differences in colors (in the West white is at once
set on top: the nurses and nurse’s aides in the maternity, the white tiling of the floors and walls, or the white
painting of the walls and ceilings in the same maternity). That is where we have to speak of the entoptic shapes
and maybe sounds or sound clusters. These audio and sonorous “Gestalten” are in phase with some of them that
are already present in the brain or body like the beating heart. Research on this point is rather advanced for
entoptics in the visual field, but there should be some research on entoptics, that would no longer be optics but
entsonics (rhythm, intervals, notes, clusters of notes, particularly three or four, clusters of sounds), a concept I
copied (the meaning is not exactly the same) but not borrowed from Earsonics (https://www.earsonics.com/).
And keep in mind all that is recorded in the brain in Brain Machine Code, visual or audio, that can come out
naturally, one way, or the other.
Naming
That’s when, 12 to 16 months after birth, the child who has been deeply surrounded by language and who
has developed his discrimination that could go down to syllables, produces the first syllables of his own,
syllables on the patterns of CV, or simply V (for emotions). His very first linguistic action will be to produce
some words based on consonants that are associated with sucking the mother’s teat or ending that sucking. The
first movement of the lips produces the bilabial consonant /m/ and the second either the plosive consonant /p-
b/ or the dental consonant /t-d/, or both, maybe not at the same time (teeth are necessary for dental consonants,
though you can ask older people if they can pronounce dentals before they set their dentures in their mouths).
And this is something very human: the child will at once attribute a cluster of sounds to a particular item in the
environment: /ma/ or /mama/ for the “nurturing” person who is most often the mother or women in creches, /pa/
or /papa/, /dad/ or /dada/ for people slightly more distant in the child’s environment. The child is realizing,
making real, materializing his naming ability that he probably had been developing mentally for 12 to 16 months
before he could utter his first words. My own son, who was in a crè
che as soon as three months old, was using
/mama/ for the nurturing women in the creche as well as for his mother. He learned very fast and accepted /lulu/
(a shortening of her name) for his mother. Thus, the Brain Machine Code is extended into articulated language
and the names for each item encountered in the direct environment. That’s one point on which the Bible has it
nearly right:
Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air and brought them to Adam
to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was its name. So, Adam gave names
to all cattle, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. (Genesis 2:19-20 New King James Version)
We can note this Lord God did not provide Adam with language, though since he was created in God’s own
image, we can assume that God had language, but that’s an assumption. Adam had the ability to create words to
name everything. It is interesting to see that some of the sacred texts of at least three religions, Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam do not state language was a gift from God, but state that language is a developing
capability of man and soon enough woman.
Conceptualizing
That’s the third stage on the road to writing. The oral language the infant and then the child develop from
his/her environment and from the capabilities we have just described, will run into a simple problem. There is
more than one item that can be called a dog. There is more than one item that can be called a rose, or even a red
rose. It is not economical to give a name to every single separate individual item around. It is a lot easier to use
18. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
456
some deep learning and Homo Sapiens used such deep learning 300,000 years BCE to give one name to all things
that look alike. The only approach I have read in this field is Vygotsky’s Thought and Language which shows
how a child, even before being able to speak, will systematically bring together objects that have one
characteristic in common: to be just close at one time, or to have a particular color or shape, or being attached to
a particular person or activity. At first, these complexes are just heaps of items, but very fast they get formal
(shape color), personal (attached to the nurturer or the father), or functional (eating, drinking, “playing”). This
leads to concepts. One word used for a whole set of items linked together because they look, or sound, alike is a
way to conceptualize. A concept is a tag for various items that have one or several characteristics in common.
All dogs will be dogs, even the species I have never seen yet, and I might take for something else if I met them.
This function is fundamental because it expands the language and at the same time it expands the mind, not the
brain which has the capacity to discriminate items in the environment, and then to discriminate what looks alike
and bring them together, but no more. The mind goes beyond those piles of items and reaches the concept. The
word “concept” is itself a concept and thus is autological or homological as opposed to words that would be
heterological like “long” that is not long but short. I think we should have a whole spectrum between fully
homological and fully heterological, all those words that are partly homological and partly heterological, with a
varying proportion somewhere between 1% and 99%, one way or the other. You can check the Grelling-Nelson
paradox to understand that thinking in “either-or” terms leads to unsolvable contradictions. “French” is not
homological because it is not a French word but an English word. Someone who suddenly utters a whole mouthful
of gross words (The most distressing symptom of Tourette syndrome is coprolalia, where foul or “dirty” words
are used during normal speech. https://www.empr.com/home/tools/patient-fact-sheets/tourette-syndrome-
patient-information-fact-sheet/2/) is going to excuse himself by saying “Sorry, please excuse my French.” But
all the swear words were perfectly English, and yet they are “French” for the swearing person. In this particular
meaning of “French” as “vulgar”, it is a perfectly homological word that designates vulgarity, and this “French”
is vulgar. Think of President Bush wanting to rename French Fries Freedom Fries (keeping the FF initials though)
to punish President Chirac for having vetoed the war in Iraq in the Security Council of the United Nations.
“French” in English became homological as meaning “hostile from France” and hence having to be gotten rid of.
To conclude this point, Silvia Ferrara does not understand or at least does not take into consideration this long
process of mental activity that preceded by a very long margin the invention—sorry development—of writing.
Representing
We cannot know when Homo Sapiens started representing objects by drawing them realistically or
reductively because, for a long period, they used non-durable media that got lost in time and decay. But
representation on durable media started at least around 50,000 BCE and I will insist ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Cave paintings, cave “scribbling”, portable stones, bones, ivory tusks, etc., with representational drawings on
them or non-representational markings, either geometric forms or simple series of notches to record we DO NOT
KNOW WHAT (Think of the Inca ropes with knots: we know it was connected to some stories, records, memories,
etc., but we cannot—yet—decipher these knots). It is not because we do not know what these markings represent
that they do not represent anything. It is all the more pregnant when you consider the non-pictorially
representational elements like dots, waves, lines of all types, geometric figures like circles, triangles, and squares,
and even the handprints in all those caves and on all these rockfaces. They are there because an intention justified
them in essence and justified them in this permanent recording that has come up to us in today’s world. Every
19. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 457
item in these caves and on these rocks, portable or not, represents some “meaning” probably expressed orally at
the time. The series of dots are—first hypothesis—counting something. This will survive this old period, and
that’s why we can say these dots or other repetitive markings probably have to do with numbering, which proves,
by the way, these very old Homo Sapiens knew how to count, though we do not know when they started counting,
meaning giving names to numbers, or in linguistic terms, extracting numbered sets of items from the original
compact plural, like quadrial, trial, dual, and finally unity: the discrimination of numbers has to be progressive.
A series of dots at the top of one page in the Codice Maya de Mexico represents the number of days to count to
reach the next page, meaning the next phase of Venus’ cycle. Here are pages 5 and 6.
Figure 5. Codice Maya de Mexico, pages 5 and 6.
At the top of page 5 (on the left), you have two horizontal bars in a bundle first, and then four dots. The dots
are hierarchically higher in the Maya counting system and each one represents 20 at all levels beyond the first 20
basic elements, hence in this environment of this book, 20 days. Consequently, the four dots represent 80 days to
which the two horizontal bars for five + five = ten more days in the bundle on the left. Note, by the way, the
hierarchy goes up from left to right which is the reverse order when compared to our own writing of complex
numbers: top hierarchical ranks come first on the left. From page five to page six you have to count 90 days, “the
90-day disappearance of Venus at superior conjunction.” (page 74). It took at least one century for Western
scholars to be sure about the numerical system of the Mayas. And the Mayas are still alive and still speak their
language(s). But their writing system was banned, and severely punished when used, by the Conquistadors: one
of the worst cultural genocides ever performed by men of their own volition and decision.
In the same way, page 6 on the right has a length expressed by the same type of numeration at the top of the
page: 12 dots, each for 20 days; hence 240 days to which we have to add the 10 days in the bundle on the left,
hence a total of 250 days, the period during which Venus appears as the Evening Star after the superior
conjunction. Of course, numbers have names in Maya, but the numbers are not Roman or Arabic numbers, they
20. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
458
are Maya numbers, horizontal bars, and dots with a hierarchy of vigesimal tiers from zero to eternity (or nearly
for the Mayas). With this question of numeration, we reach the next stage leading to writing.
Symbolizing
The horizontal bars for every five days or simply five items being counted, and the use of dots for single
days or any unit in any tiered hierarchical level for 20 of the lower units, is a numeration system and these
elements properly used and understood are symbols of the numbers behind. One day is a “k’in”, T544 ,
in the lowest tier of the numeration. One is “jun” or “hun”, TI or T329 . And then there are numbers
up to 20 which is “k’al”, T683a , not to be confused with zero, which is “mi” in Maya meaning empty, a
very complex concept that has many different glyphic realizations. First Michael Coe and Mark Van Stone
(Reading the Maya Glyphs, 2001) give the following quartet: . The favorite glyph for zero
in dating is the third one. But if we check John Montgomery’s Dictionary of Maya Hieroglyphs, we get three
glyphs: “mi”, T123 , T217v_a , T217v_b . The meaning is first of all within Maya conceptualization
of “zero” as “empty”, which corresponds to what I said about 20, “k’al” that triggers the completion of a vigesimal
group that is at once turned into one more unit in the immediately higher tier in the system, leaving the lowest
tier empty. Visually the two stopping hands mean “completion” but both hands have double circular empty dots
inside a circular cartridge on the right side of the hand as opposed to the thumb on the left side of the hand which
is probably a right-hand’s back since one of these two glyphs shows the nails, but we could assume also one is
the back of the hand and the other is the palm side of the hand. But these empty circles, or beads, or dots on the
hands are a symbol of their having been cut off, hence amputated, hence in phase with the completion meaning
because when you reach the 20th item in one level of numeration it triggers the upraising of one unit into the
higher level leaving the lower level empty hence “mi”. The Mayas, instead of what some say, that they counted
from zero to 19, actually counted from one to 20, and 20 triggered the emptying, hence the zeroing of the content
of this particular lower level of the numeration. This triggering is very similar to our own Western decimal system
but within a vigesimal system. Even today this role of 20, “k’al”, is not clear for scholars who have had at the
very least 10 years of Western mathematics. This is the symbolizing level. Each one of these words becomes a
symbol that can be used for many other things than just the referential items in front of our eyes. Then we may
understand that the dot in Maya can be one day or “k’in”, or one “winal” (20 units, days, or whatever), or one
“tun” (a solar year of 18 winals, 360 days), or one “k’atun” (20 tuns or 7,200 days). And then you go on with
“bak’tun” (144,000 days), “piktun” (2,880,000 days), “kalabtun” (57,600,000 days), “kinchiltun” (1,152,000,000
days). That’s for time, but it is calculated on “tuns” that are only 18 “winals”. The pure mathematical calculation
should work on tuns of 20 winals and subsequent vigesimal multiples. A symbol can be used for various different
situations with various different meanings. And that is where we can shift from one word represented by this or
that representational drawings, then simplified to become symbolical of the particular referential element behind
them, hence the oral names of them, but these symbols being hieroglyphs or composite glyphs, or
syllabary/alphabetical glyphs, what we in most languages call alphabetic writing, we have jumped from symbols
to phonetic writing. There is no break in that continuous development.
21. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 459
No Phylogenic Break With Writing
Writing is the result of
Figure 6. The six mental stages of the emergence of writing in Homo Sapiens. The first three are the emergence of oral
language. The second three are the emergence of writing, or the shift from oral to written language.
from left (anterior) to right (posterior), from top (hierarchically inferior) to bottom (hierarchically superior). This
is true for a child learning his/her first language or languages (not so much for foreign languages) but this is only
the psychogenetic vision of the acquisition of language by a child that reproduces the whole process of the
development of language (the ability to produce oral articulated utterances) right through to writing (the ability
to transcribe into some material representation on some medium of what could be uttered orally) as it happened
in about 300,000 years. Writing is not a discovery because it was not found on a tree or in a cave, not even
provided by God in Genesis. Writing is not an invention except if we take this “invention” to mean the
development of a new extension of man from older extensions that phylogenetically preceded this “invention” of
writing. It is easy to say invention, but it is false.
Figure 7. Six iconic signs representing a “leg” according to Silvia Ferrara with no specification of the oral “word,” nor
of the meaning of these iconic signs. Note the feet of these legs except in archaic cuneiform – that does not look like a
leg, or does it? – are oriented to the left, and this is not explained by Silvia Ferrara.
Silvia Ferrara gives on page 21 of her book, a diagram about the early stages of writing when what she calls
icons were used to represent meaning. The six icons on this page are what she considers feet or legs. We could
question the leg or foot seen in the archaic cuneiform icon. The others are legs or feet, in fact, four legs and one
foot. However, she does not provide the words behind these icons in the six languages retained here, and she
does not provide the meanings of these six icons. What’s more, her caption treats the first one separately under
the noun “hieroglyphs” (by the way why the plural since there is only, one?), the next three together due to the
22. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
460
concatenation of the three under one noun “hieroglyphs”, and the last two together again under the noun
“hieroglyphs”. It is surprising, since they are all “hieroglyphs”, that they are not all treated equally. It is surprising
to bring together a Sumerian cuneiform hieroglyph, a Nahuatl hieroglyph, and a Cretan hieroglyph that cannot
have anything in common, due to the spatial and temporal distances between them. It is just as much surprising
to bring together the Mayan and Anatolian hieroglyphs for the very same reason as before. How can six writing
systems that cannot have any relation among themselves come to the same icon, assuming that Silvia Ferrara
implies they cover the same concept and the same meaning? Is that a case of entoptics? But the main question
remains to know whether these six icons cover the same concept and the same meaning, no matter what the six
oral words behind them might be. We have no way to check what she says because we do not know where to find
these icons. It is impossible to find the “archaic cuneiform” icon she gives, in RenéLabat’s book. Without the
Sumerian word, we cannot find the archaic form of it in cuneiform writing.
From Mayan Glyphic Syllabary Writing to the Inquisition’s Genocidal Autodafé
On the other hand, since these icons can only be traced by highly specialized readers, I only qualify for the
Maya icon, which is a glyph I know visually. The image really is the icon of a foot seen as a metaphorical symbol
in Mesoamerica of the road on which that foot can walk. The word is “b’e” T301 and T301v .
The foot is thus metaphorical, and it indicates the place where that foot can walk. b'e/B'E (b'e) (T301/T301v) 1>
phonetic sign 2>noun “road” <> (John Montgomery) represents a human footprint on the surface of the road.
(Peter Mathews) b'i/B'IH (b'i/b'ih) (Christophe Helmke) 1> b'i (b'i) b'i ~ syllabogram 2> b'i (b'i[h]) b'ih ~ noun
“road”, “path” <> represents a human footprint on the surface of the road, a Mesoamerican convention for
denoting roads. But we have to move to another very close glyph. The word is “b’i” T585 b'i/B'I (b'i)
(T585) 1> phonetic sign 2>noun “road” <> (John Montgomery), the “quincunx” glyph. (Peter Mathews) b'i/B'IH
(b'i/b'ih) (Christophe Helmke) 1> b'i (b'i) b'i ~ syllabogram 2> b'i (b'i[h]) b'ih~noun “road”, “path” <> represents
a human footprint on the surface of the road, a Mesoamerican convention for denoting roads. <> (Jacques
Coulardeau) Christophe Helmke’s remark is not correct. The quincunx represents the four cardinal points plus
the fifth direction in the center that goes down to Xibalba (the realm of the Death Lords) and up to Chaan (the
sky, the realm of those who come out of Xibalba victorious, meaning those who have not been destroyed by the
Death Lord during their compulsory passage through Xibalba after their death). It becomes metaphorical for the
road because it is a symbol of moving around, like the sun, a symbol of traveling, etc.
The word for “foot” is completely different and Montgomery does not have a word for “leg”. If we consider
“foot” we get the glyph OCH/OK T765 or T765v OCH/OK (och/ok) (T765) 1> intransitive verb
“to enter” 2> noun “foot” <> (John Montgomery) represents an animal, probably a dog. From here we can get to
a positive vision of this “enter” notion with TA OCH-le{l} T102.765:188 TA OCH-le-{l} (ta ochlel)
(T102.765:188) 1> prepositional phrase “at the foot of” 2> prepositional phrase, “at the enter-treeship”, “in enter-
treeship”; general reference to “heir designation”. But a negative derivation leads us to OCH B’I T207v.585a
OCH B'I (och b'i) (T207v.585a) > verbal phrase “entered the road”; general “death” verb. We can note
23. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 461
the “b’i” extension in the form of the quincunx which is a reference to the cardinal points plus the central tree,
but this quincunx is also the normal pilgrimage of a man from birth in the east like the sun, growth in the south
like the sun, death in the west like the sun, descent into Xibalba to confront the Death Lords, victory and exit in
the north, and then the possible ascent of the tree to reach Chaan. This concept of death coming from the one of
“foot”, “road”, and “enter”, makes it possible to have OCH B’I-ja T361:585a.181 OCH B'I-ja (och
b'i-aj) (T361:585a.181) > passive verbal phrase “was entered the road”; general “death” verb. <> (Jacques
Coulardeau) T181 “ja” is the passive element in the composite glyph (it can be a simple passive suffix, or it could
be an autonomous passive element, we will not enter this discussion here). Note to the central position of the
quincunx for the road, hence travel, is turned into enter by the prefix OCH that reinforces the quincunx. But we
are dealing now with death.
Yet, the story is not finished. If we consider the action “to walk”, we remain within these glyphic references.
XAN-na T202ms[585]:23 XAN-na (xan) (T202ms[585]:23) 1 > intransitive verb “to go” 2> intransitive
verb “to walk” 3> intransitive verb “to travel”. We can note the quincunx T585 B’I is embedded in the XAN
T202ms glyph, thus adding the road to the simple movement verb XAN T202ms, plus the extension T23 “na” to
reinforce and reassert the final “n” of the main glyph. This first expression of the notion “go-walk-travel” can be
extended with a prefix to phonetically reassert the initial consonant of the main element XAN. Hence xa-XAN-
na T114.202ms[585]:23 xa-XAN-na (xan) (T114.202ms[585]:23) 1 > intransitive verb “to go” 2>
intransitive verb “to walk” 3> intransitive verb “to travel”. This extension itself has a meaning: xa T114
xa/XA (xa) (T114) 1 > phonetic sign 2> adverbial prefix “already” 3> adverbial prefix “again”; characterizes a
verb as “happening again”, “happening already”. Hence the reinforcement is metaphorical here since you cannot
die a second time. Our trip through this notion and its writing in syllabary glyphs mostly is not finished. The next
two cases embed, the way we have already seen the quincunx B’I in the XAN glyph, but it can be actually read
as a prefix to XAN with B’IXAN-na T95[585]:23 B'IXAN-na (b'ixan) (T95[585]:23) 1 > incompletive
irregular verb “to go” 2> incompletive irregular verb “to walk” 3> incompletive irregular verb “travel” 4>
completive verb “went”. (Christophe Helmke) > B'IX-na (b'ix[a]n) b'ix-an~noun-verb. “to go”, “to travel”.
And the next one is just as clear: B’IXAN-ni-ya T95[585]:116:126 B'IXAN-ni-ya (b'ixaniy)
(T95[585]:116:126) > completive irregular verb “went”. (Christophe Helmke) > B'IX-ni-ya (b'ix[a]niiy) b'ix-
an-iiy~noun-verb-deictic “went...ago”, “traveled...ago”.
From AutodaféDestruction to Jun-Nal-Ye-like Resurrection
It is time to conclude on this point. If we enter details about the writing system of the Mayan language, we
find out the representational glyphs may have survived as representational elements, with even some abstract
representational elements embedded inside another. The script may neglect or specify these embedded elements,
then the transcription may also neglect or specify these embedded elements, but only because the words already
exist that way in the oral practice of the language. The simple transcription of the quincunx as “b’i” overlooks
24. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
462
the visual effect the quincunx itself as a visual glyph carries in its semantic references, be they paradigmatic or
syntagmatic. Without stating the existence of the oral language as a fully developed language in its own
phylogeny at the time of the development of the writing system, the writing system itself becomes in many ways
senseless, meaningless, unmotivated, and then in many ways absurd. True enough the cultural genocide of the
Spaniards who forced the Mayas to shift to Spanish, and the fact that the Mayas refused to abandon their
languages and came to the compromise that they transcribed their glyphic writing system (they could only
remember it after the books had been burned, remember it orally in their minds) into a more or less phonetic
writing system based on the oral language itself. The language lost a lot of the embedded elements that were
visible, visual then, and became invisible, hence died, except as paradigmatic memory. The paradigmatic
dimension of the language lost a tremendous amount in its Latinized writing.
This emphasizes the fact we cannot explain the various writing systems in the world, and even the simple
writing procedure, its target within the human emergence in the distant past if we do not follow the whole process
from the very development of articulated oral language from the simple set of calls of apes, and some limited
level of linguistic communication with pre-Sapiens hominins who did not have the larynx, articulatory, and
respiratory systems that Homo Sapiens developed naturally through mutations naturally selected for the fast
bipedal long-distance running Homo Sapiens developed when he shifted from the forest to the savanna. The
mutations of the foot and the various necessary mutations for his particular running contained in themselves the
potential collateral development of language and, at least nearly 300,000 years after the beginning of the
development of articulated human language, the development of writing for most human communities and
languages. The migrations out of Black Africa are actually following the timeline of the phylogeny of human
articulated language. As I said, writing is neither a discovery nor an invention. It is a development, and as such
it is an extension of human articulated oral language to shift from oral to written, from in praesentia to in absentia,
and from direct conversation to indirect communication. That definitely is a revolution in the history of the human
species, but it is in no way a complete break from the oral past. It is its continuing development and its extension
from orality to durable media which will become virtual, digital, and yet still just as real as recorded oral language
and language written down in some scripts on some durable material media.
Silvia Ferrara’s Six Cradles
Those are for me the main questions challenging Silvia Ferrara. Just very fast, let me mention the “six cradles
across the globe” (Silvia Ferrara, 2022, p. 85) of the writing ability, but by linking writing to the bureaucracy of
a state she misses the phylogeny of writing: it becomes, including in the timeline, an “invention” with no
antecedents. In fact, we have to wonder if the development of language from oral communication to written
mnemonic and communicational forms justifying/requiring/generating vaster communities, sedentarism, hence a
new social organization and new architecture for their more permanent living quarters, is not one essential cause
of the emergence of empires, hence states, hence massive architectural structures, and whether the development
of oral language into written language is not dialectically connected to the evolution of human society from
migratory to sedentary practices. Maybe the “bureaucracy” [a term that is definitely out of context between the
peak of the Ice Age and the Christian Era: it sounds like a transfer from today to that past directly drawn from
the language of some left-leaning party supporter] of these new entities requires some kind of recording system
(which can be purely oral, hence using memory, like with the Mali Empire’s “constitution” in the 13th century,
check the Kurukan Fuga Manden Charter, registered at UNESCO, 1235, https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/manden-
25. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 463
charter-proclaimed-in-kurukan-fuga-00290 that was reconstituted from memory at the end of the 20th century,
hence seven centuries later).
Here are the six cradles of the “writing invention(s)”.
1. Mesoamerica in the Oaxaca Valley and at the site of Monte Alban 300-100 BCE.
2. Peru, Gallinazo Culture, early centuries of the first millennium CE.
3. Egypt, the Naqada period I and II, midpoint of the fourth millennium BCE.
4. Mesopotamia in Uruk or modern-day Iraq, midpoint of the fourth millennium BCE.
5. The Indus Valley, the Harappa Culture, 3200-2600 BCE.
6. Central China at Erlitou in the Henan Region along the Yellow River, 1800-1500 BCE.
The non-chronological order of the sites is mostly unjustified since the six cradles are supposed to have had
no connections among themselves due to the distance between any two sites, and the general self-centered
functioning of the various sites. Then the ordering is not neutral, it is in a way ideological but not clear as for the
ideology concerned here. Why start with Mesoamerica and Peru (South America)? They sound late in the process
but when did human communities arrive in these South- and Meso-Americas? Where were they coming from,
from what culture? The emerging idea today is that they came from Southeast Asia and the South Pacific around
30,000 BCE. What heritage did they carry in their mental and mnemonic bags? On the other hand, I don’t see
how the Egyptians and the Sumerians are seen as separate cradles when we know the extremely active role of the
Phoenicians in the Mediterranean Sea, with Egypt and the whole Middle East that was their background if not
their back base even before writing developed in Egypt or Mesopotamia. The Phoenicians were to be the continuators
of the writing practices of the Egyptians, and why not the Sumerians, or the cuneiform writing system vastly in
the hands of the Semitic (like Egyptians and Phoenicians) Akkadians who were the scribes of the Sumerians?
The Phoenicians were to invent the first real alphabet, except it was consonantal, hence Semitic, apart from the
first “ālep” vowel only written at the initial of a word. “The Phoenician alphabet developed from the Proto-
Canaanite alphabet, during the 15th century BCE. Before then the Phoenicians wrote with a cuneiform script.
The earliest known inscriptions in the Phoenician alphabet come from Byblos and date back to 1000 BCE.”4
The
Greeks will later add the other vowels, and it is interesting to remember that Sumerian had four vowels that were
actually written since they all could be individual words. The last two, the Indus Valley and China’s Yellow
River are not really studied or presented in any detail, and what’s more Asia (Siberia and Southeast Asia) is
central for all the migrations in the South Pacific as far as South America (Southeast Asia), and the migrations
from Asia to North America (Siberia). Once again what heritage did these populations carry in their backpacks?
And the big mystery of the Denisovans who are pre-Sapiens (what and who are they exactly? What were their
representational and symbolic activities, and first of all their communicational method, including language?) and
other archaeologically recently discovered pre-Sapiens or Sapiens (?) hominin individuals in Asia? It’s probably
too early to answer these problematic questions, but reducing everything to six cradles sounds very restrictive.
Sketchy Use of the Johari Window
The use of the Johari window, on page 221 and subsequent pages, is interesting but extremely reductive.
Everything is down to four quadrants. Let’s start with these quadrant presentations.
4
https://www.omniglot.com/writing/phoenician.htm#:~:text=The%20Phoenician%20alphabet%20developed%20from,date%20ba
ck%20to%201000%20BC.
26. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
464
Figure 8. The Johari Window as used by Silvia Ferrara (Silvia Ferrara, 2022, page 221).
The first graph states that there are only two sides, “SELF” and “OTHERS” but also that these “OTHERS”
are all identical, similar, and homogeneous, which is a fable. As soon as you consider a plural collective identity,
at least in languages and communication, you have to assume that these “OTHERS” are multiple, and, as I am
going to show, then, the Johari window opens on a kaleidoscopic reality. But, in the second graph, I understand
that with ONE anthropologist (of any qualification) confronted with one undeciphered script of what we assume
is an unknown language, we can reduce the Johari window to myself only confronted to a dual reality, SCRIPT
versus LANGUAGE. But this reduction is dangerous because the confrontation of a person, any person this time,
any tourist in a foreign country, or any French-speaking native in France versus the multifarious population of
some areas like Department 93 or the neighborhoods or districts in Marseilles-North, or so many other places of
the type, this French-speaking native will be confronted to scripts and languages he does not know how to read,
write, or speak, and scripts or languages he does not understand, at times in the least. A Chinese or Vietnamese
tourist in Sri Lanka will be confronted with two official languages on all signs, Sinhala and Tamil that have
different scripts, and on some signs, he might have some English inscriptions in the Latin alphabet. He might
also discover that the language known as Pāli used by Buddhists in their publications, sacred texts, and preaching
or rituals, does not have a script of its own and you can find the Dhammapada in various scripts according to the
country where you are, though it is always the same Pali text. The Latin alphabet is only used for international
circulation or like in Vietnam, in countries where the Latin alphabet has been adopted. If we widen the approach to
let’s say two people confronted with one script and one language, we have not four options but 16 options with ME
as the person who is focused on, and X as the only counterpart or interlocutor, but with L for language that can be
positive or negative, known or unknown, and S for Script that can be positive or negative, known or unknown.
Imagine an anthropologist and a linguist together looking at an undeciphered script of an unknown language
brought up by archaeology with a precise area where it once flourished and a period in which it did exist. The
linguist and the anthropologists are going to react differently to this set of data. Think of an opera aficionado
watching a performance of a Russian opera in Moscow’s Bolshoi with Russian Cyrillic sub- or over-titles. If he
does not know Russian and if he does not know the Cyrillic alphabet, he might be at a loss, but he won’t because
27. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 465
he is an aficionado who studied this opera before going to the performance, with a translation—along with the
Russian original in Cyrillic and Latin (or any other) alphabet—in the language he generally speaks or uses in
everyday life. He will then be able to follow absolutely all the words, understand the general meaning due to the
translation he used before the show, and yet he does not speak or read Russian, and he is lost in the street just to
get his way to let’s say the Red Square (though Moscow may have some signs in some non-Cyrillic writing or
non-Slav language). Of course, Silvia Ferrara is reducing her interest to an undeciphered script, of an old and
dead language she cannot identify except with the geographical location where it was found and the time period
when it was used. That’s a very small share of the general problem. Here is the presentation of the general
situation for two people, ME and X, for both Script (S) and Language (L) and know or unknown (+ or -).
Figure 9. All possible situations of two people, the minimum composition of a team in teamwork, confronted to a
language and its script: sixteen possible cases.
But imagine you are in a situation where you are confronted by two (X and Y) or more people right in front
of the script (S) of any language (L). From 16 possible options you just jump to an exponential curve getting to
millions when you just reach five or six people, all different, for example in Silvia Ferrara’s approach, an
anthropologist, an archaeologist, a linguist (from which or what school or obedience?), a probabilities specialist,
and Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence deciphering and translating devices. What about politicians from the
country concerned who might make the deciphering of this ancestral language of their country a political or
cultural objective? Just let me give you a schematic vision of what it becomes for three people, ME, X, and Y.
Figure 10. As soon as the team grows beyond two the situations are growing exponentially: Basic sketch for three people.
The solutions should be sixty-four. This leads to chaotic situations and conformity phenomena.
28. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
466
Exponential is a euphemism. The visual approach of Silvia Ferrara in Figure 38 is at least reductive, if not
unrealistic. The general public, and particularly the public educated in the field, deserves a more diversified approach.
Imagine “Y” is a linguist, and at once a question arises: is he a structuralist, a psychomechanician, an applied
psycholinguist, a transformational grammarian, or a transformational semantician? There are so many other possible
approaches for me, in this field that you have to be, on top of your theoretical affiliation, a phylogenic linguist.
But what does this option mean and imply? The first principle of a phylogenist in linguistics is that any state of
a language is the result of the development of previous states that cannot be reconstructed by some retrospective
backward movement but has to be approached from the situations and time periods concerned, thus trying to
deduce from what we know about general linguistic phylogeny from before articulated language to articulated
language, and what is articulated language, and how do the three articulations articulate themselves onto one and
after one another? We can get answers to these questions by observing how a child learns his/her first language
or first languages, from before birth to let’s say age six or seven. We have to confront children from different
linguistic backgrounds because there is no reason for a Chinese child to learn his first language exactly the same
way as a Maya child, even if we consider (and this is essential) that the Maya kid’s people have been culturally
genocided at the level of their languages. But language is first of all oral and there, the genocide has been a lot
less ferocious than at the level of the writing of the language (banned) and the material written artifacts (burned).
What Does Jack Nicholson Step on This Medusa-Like Raft for?
The reference to Jack Nicholson in the film “Five Easy Pieces” is purely rhetorical because, first we are not
dealing with music, but with undeciphered scripts that have no known oral dimension, and because Silvia Ferrara
adds a sixth step, and is it a sixth easy piece? But let me quote the steps.
Step 1. Inventory of signs.
Step 2. Positional frequency of signs.
Step 3. Grammatical patterns.
Step 4. Typological concatenations (“network analysis”).
Step 5. Common factors with other related scripts.
[Step 6]. For our sixth piece [the cinematographic and musical metaphor again, this time freely extended
beyond the meaning in the film], we attempt to apply phonetic values (Silvia Ferrara, 2022, pp. 239-246).
These steps, and particularly the sixth one, are, and is, in contradiction with what she has been repeating
over and over again that a script has no reason to be connected with the language it transcribes. Yes, a script does
have plenty of reasons because the various signs in the script have sooner or later to be “transcribed” into phonetic
values, morphological and syntactic values, and semantic values, the three elements being directly dependent on
the language they are materialized in. The script is the transcription of the language behind it. The script, as
Marshall McLuhan might say, is the extension of the oral language it transcribes. At times, and this moment is
one of them, I feel Silvia Ferrara is spitting in the fountain she has to drink from sooner or later. And her sixth
step is one of these moments when she needs to drink from this phylogenic fountain.
To conclude these remarks, I would like to quote the 10 commandments of the deciphering anthropologist
(Silvia Ferrara, 2022, pp. 235-236). I may comment along the way in square brackets.
Ferrara’s Conforming Non-Phylogenic Decalogue
“1. Don’t mistake language for script.” [But don’t forget the script is the phylogenetic extension of the language.]
29. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING 467
“2. Don’t fall for false similarities.” [Being alike does not mean being related: the connection has to be
phylogenetic and there must be a route from one to the other or vice versa.]
“3. Don’t jump to conclusions.” [Note here she makes the “confirm/conform” mistake again and uses
“confirmation” (meaning: Professor X confirmed my hypothesis in spite of the desire of many not to.) instead of
“conformation” (meaning: The young greenhorn Ph.D. graduate has tried to conform to what his department
mainly thinks, though he could not accept the betrayal of his own ideas this conformation would mean.)]
“4. It is not enough to simply ‘read’ the signs. ‘Deciphering’ means reconstructing the underlying linguistic
structure, the grammar hidden beneath the script.” [I couldn’t agree more and that means the script is the surface
that extends the deeper reality of the language, its morphology, its grammar, its semantics, etc.]
“5. Follow nothing but the rigor of your methodology.” [Do NOT CONFORM but look for
CONFIRMATION of your approach.]
“6. Don’t exaggerate the possibilities.”
“7. Don’t put forward arcane or out-of-contact theories.” [That is unluckily the specialty of Deep Learning
and Generative Artificial Intelligence.]
“8. Don’t go looking to become a lone hero.” [But believe in yourself because many will try to make you
THE LONE ZERO.]
“9. Don’t throw yourself into impossible missions.” [This is not brilliant. Jesus Christ did throw himself into
an impossible mission and it cost him his life, but he became THE LONE HERO for his followers.]
“10. Don’t get me involved.” [Unluckily for her, she is involved from the very first moment she dreamed of
writing and publishing this book. The book is her involvement and anyone who reads it has the right to get her
involved, even if she locks herself up in her campus ivory tower. By the way, this 10th commandment is the
perfect CONFORMATION to the university spirit of living in a protected world separate from the real world
OUTSIDE. In June 1974, at the end of the university year, before leaving California to go back to France one
week later, I was approached by a journalist from the local paper of Davis, California, where I had been teaching
for 12 months or so at UCD, and he asked me: “So, what do you think of Davis?” I answered: “It is fine and even
the best for research because we are living like in a ghetto protected from the outside world.” Some found the
humor a little bit dark.
Utopian Dystopian Non-Phylogenic Perspective
Silvia Ferrara sees the future in the colors, in fact, a black-and-white vision, of Ray Kurzweil, the icon of
transhumanistic America. “The brain-computer interface will be complete” in a hundred years, “if we are not
completely extinct by then (which is highly probable).” (Silvia Ferrara, 2022, p. 275). At least, Ray Kurzweil
predicts the Singularity for 2050 and certainly not—or at least, he does not commit himself to the point—the
extinction of the human species (and certainly not the racist “race”). And let’s get some echoes of the delirium
of this end.
synthetic telepathy… Words … will nearly all be lost, given that languages—the seven thousand languages in the world
today, and all their immense vocabularies—will die out: English, Spanish, and Mandarin, along with a few mash-ups between
them (see Spanglish) will likely be the only languages spoken in the world. (Silvia Ferrara, 2022, p. 276)
This delirium is engulfed into a rhetorical movement that is absurd: “Emotions are as old as the Earth, the most
essential part of our human existence.” I did not know the Earth had emotions, and these human emotions existed
30. 300,000 (AT LEAST) YEARS FOR HOMO SAPIENS TO DEVELOP WRITING
468
with humanity as soon as the Earth appeared in the cosmos. The human species is definitely a very old species,
4.543 billion years old (American Museum of Natural History, https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/darwin/the-
world-before-darwin/how-old-is-earth#:~:text=Today%2C%20we%20know%20from%20radiometric,about%
204.5%20billion%20years%20old).
We sure have done better than Methusalem and his miserable 969 years, a threesome of some anthropo-
genetico-linguistic type, where utopia meets dystopia as if dystopia was where utopia goes to die in some
apocalyptic singularity.
References
Coe, M., & Stone, M. V. (2001). Reading the Maya Glyphs. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson.
Coulardeau, J. (2013). Sigiri Graffiti. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2014). Shadow in the night Sigiriya’s shiny ladies: Bilingual English & French edition translated from the Sigiri
Graffiti of Sigiriya. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2018). Stephen King: The Maverick Rapscallion. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2020a). AI unavoidable & unforgivable tool: Aka make friends with AI translators. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2020b). Paleolithic women: For gendered linguistic analysis: Alexander Marshack—The roots of civilization—
Revised and augmented edition—1991—A Review. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2020c). Shakespearian addiction. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2021a). Black theater matters: Heroic Anna Deavere Smith. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2021b). Time is ticking backward: Le temps nous est compté
. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J. (2022). Guided self-learning literacy: In a plurilingual communication-oriented knowledge society. Pair: Editions
La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Coulardeau, A. (2017). Freedom of expression and copyright: The foundations of all liberties. Pair: Editions La
Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Eve, I. (2012). The Indian ocean: The mare nostrum of humanity. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Eve, I. (2013a). “Supernatural” car chase or joy ride? Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Eve, I. (2013b). Handel’s Agrippina modern interpretations and the role of countertenors. Pair: Editions La
Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Eve, I. (2013c). The U.S. Supreme Court: A universal lesson in constitutional human rights. Pair: Editions La
Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Eve, I. (2016). The Indian Ocean from Admiral Zheng He To hub and spoke container maritime commerce. Pair:
Editions La Dondaine.
Coulardeau, J., & Eve, I. (2017). Cro-Magnon’s language: Emergence of homo sapiens, invention of articulated language,
migrations out of Africa. Pair: Editions La Dondaine.
Descartes, R. (2011). Discours de la mé
thode (1637). Pair: Les Échos du Maquis. Retrieved from
https://philosophie.cegeptr.qc.ca/wp-content/documents/Discours-de-la-m%C3%A9thode.pdf
Dika, T. R. (2023). Descartes’ method. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring
2023 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/descartes-method/
Ferrara, Silvia, The Greatest Invention: A History of the World in Nine Mysterious Scripts, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York,
NY, 2022.
Labat, R., & Malbran-Labat, F. (2002). Manuel d'é
pigraphie akkadienne: Signes-Syllabaire-Idé
ogrammes. Paris: Geuthner Manuels.
Montgomery, J. (2002). Dictionary of Maya hieroglyphs. New York, NY: Hippocrene Books, Inc. Retrieved from
http://www.famsi.org/mayawriting/dictionary/montgomery/index.html
Petzinger, G. V. (2016). The first signs: Unlocking the mysteries of the world’s oldest symbols. New York NY: Atria Books.
Puhvel, J. (2023). Cuneiform. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/cuneiform
Turner, A. D. (Ed.). (2022). Codice Maya de Mexico: Understanding the oldest surviving book of the Americas. Los Angeles: Getty
Research Institute, J. Paul Getty Museum.