2021: A Space Odyssey (er, a
Final Project Presentation)
Holden Fenner
Alex Kraus
Brian Reil
Zach Rubins
Holden Fenner
Zachary Rubins
Brian Reil
Alexandra Kraus
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
GOAALLLLLLLLLLL!
Goal
To evaluate current uses of technology
in academic settings to provide insight
for future changes
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.STAKEHOLDERS
Stakeholders
SU Students
Students at comparably sized
universities
Our group
Interested faculty
What we know about them
Academic mindset
Widely varying range of internet
usage/computer savvy
All have to use current SU technology to
perform in jobs/studies
QuickTime™
anda
decompressor
areneededtoseethispicture.
OBJECTIVES
Objectives
Generate 15 comments on blog
Get 50 student surveys completed
Interview 10 students from other schools
Get 20 faculty responses to survey
Measure through hand counting due to
low numbers
Objectives - Final Results
Generated 6/15 comments on blog
Had 67/50 student responses to survey :)
Interviewed 8/10 students from other schools
Had 0/20 faculty responses to survey :(
Suggestions based on surveys
Only have one login for all sites
Online Calendar that supports syllabus
transcription, class schedule and events
RSS support to list upcoming homework, tests,
groups (customizable)
Teach how to use features in Freshman Forum
Student position to update for teacher
Make Web sites mobile device friendly
Findings from student survey
Students are ineffectively collaborating
92.7% still e-mail attachments
36.5% share flash/USB sticks
Only 1 student used centralized communication
Findings from student survey
8/52 students used calendar, but used it well
- “Separate by color to organize groups of
events (assignments, class schedule,
parties/social events, special events on
campus and work schedule)”
Reasons why an online calendar would be
useful
75.4% of professors updated content on Blackboard
67.2% of professors notify students of events on Blackboard
75.4% of students get their assignments and exam dates off blackboard
10% of students in open-ended field mentioned using SYR.edu to look up
academic calendar
5% of students in open-ended field mentioned using SYR.edu to look up
events
Findings from student survey
Findings from student survey
Students would utilize mobile device friendly
Web sites
 More than half (53.2%) of students surveyed did not have
phones with internet capabilities
 But 80% of those who did said they would use it
 In the near future likely more students will have phones and
devices like iPods with internet capabilities
Feedback from Other Schools
Several schools use only one login for all
features
Most homepages aren’t very useful for day to
day classwork
Many students prefer to forward mail to GMail
None of the schools had collaboration tools
Most schools had either Blackboard or Angel
powering online classes
Some thoughts
Use all free sites to do everything (aids in
transition from school)
Many students need to use surveys. Have a
tool to encourage them to take other surveys.
Contracts with commonly used services
(Google) to implement academic systems
Facebook/iPhone apps
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
STRATEGY
Strategy
Get student input about current systems’
tools via multiple channels
Evaluate other schools’ use of
technology
Collaborate once a week to advance
project to conclusion
Raise student awareness of the tools
they use
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
TECHNOLOGIES
The Tech that made us Tick
Zoho projects (projects.zoho.com)
Wordpress
Facebook
SurveyMonkey
E-mail/Text Messages
Zoho Project
Simple and Free
E-mailed us about updates
Kept us on track for meetings
Offered ability to support blogs,
calendars and task organization
Wordpress
Familiarity
Statistics easy to track
A blog helped create a Web presence
Facebook
Web presence
Status updates allowed us to gain more
interest
SurveyMonkey
Our bread and butter
Without dedicated survey tool, survey
would have been much less successful
E-mail/Text Message
We lived on this for group
communication
Most comfortable zone for group
The Why (Like The Who, but less
musical)
Kept tools to a minimum required
Only used what we needed
LESSON LEARNED
LESSONS LEARNED
Lessons Learned
Surveys…MORE PEOPLE!!!!
Faculty unresponsive
Talk to university
No plan survives first contact
If it doesn’t work, ditch it
Student projects are not always
“important”

2021 Final Presentation

  • 1.
    2021: A SpaceOdyssey (er, a Final Project Presentation) Holden Fenner Alex Kraus Brian Reil Zach Rubins
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    QuickTime™ and a decompressor areneeded to see this picture. GOAALLLLLLLLLLL!
  • 7.
    Goal To evaluate currentuses of technology in academic settings to provide insight for future changes
  • 8.
    QuickTime™ and a decompressor areneeded to see this picture.STAKEHOLDERS
  • 9.
    Stakeholders SU Students Students atcomparably sized universities Our group Interested faculty
  • 10.
    What we knowabout them Academic mindset Widely varying range of internet usage/computer savvy All have to use current SU technology to perform in jobs/studies
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Objectives Generate 15 commentson blog Get 50 student surveys completed Interview 10 students from other schools Get 20 faculty responses to survey Measure through hand counting due to low numbers
  • 13.
    Objectives - FinalResults Generated 6/15 comments on blog Had 67/50 student responses to survey :) Interviewed 8/10 students from other schools Had 0/20 faculty responses to survey :(
  • 14.
    Suggestions based onsurveys Only have one login for all sites Online Calendar that supports syllabus transcription, class schedule and events RSS support to list upcoming homework, tests, groups (customizable) Teach how to use features in Freshman Forum Student position to update for teacher Make Web sites mobile device friendly
  • 15.
    Findings from studentsurvey Students are ineffectively collaborating 92.7% still e-mail attachments 36.5% share flash/USB sticks Only 1 student used centralized communication
  • 16.
    Findings from studentsurvey 8/52 students used calendar, but used it well - “Separate by color to organize groups of events (assignments, class schedule, parties/social events, special events on campus and work schedule)”
  • 17.
    Reasons why anonline calendar would be useful 75.4% of professors updated content on Blackboard 67.2% of professors notify students of events on Blackboard 75.4% of students get their assignments and exam dates off blackboard 10% of students in open-ended field mentioned using SYR.edu to look up academic calendar 5% of students in open-ended field mentioned using SYR.edu to look up events Findings from student survey
  • 18.
    Findings from studentsurvey Students would utilize mobile device friendly Web sites  More than half (53.2%) of students surveyed did not have phones with internet capabilities  But 80% of those who did said they would use it  In the near future likely more students will have phones and devices like iPods with internet capabilities
  • 19.
    Feedback from OtherSchools Several schools use only one login for all features Most homepages aren’t very useful for day to day classwork Many students prefer to forward mail to GMail None of the schools had collaboration tools Most schools had either Blackboard or Angel powering online classes
  • 24.
    Some thoughts Use allfree sites to do everything (aids in transition from school) Many students need to use surveys. Have a tool to encourage them to take other surveys. Contracts with commonly used services (Google) to implement academic systems Facebook/iPhone apps
  • 25.
    QuickTime™ and a decompressor areneeded to see this picture. STRATEGY
  • 26.
    Strategy Get student inputabout current systems’ tools via multiple channels Evaluate other schools’ use of technology Collaborate once a week to advance project to conclusion Raise student awareness of the tools they use
  • 27.
    QuickTime™ and a decompressor areneeded to see this picture. TECHNOLOGIES
  • 28.
    The Tech thatmade us Tick Zoho projects (projects.zoho.com) Wordpress Facebook SurveyMonkey E-mail/Text Messages
  • 29.
    Zoho Project Simple andFree E-mailed us about updates Kept us on track for meetings Offered ability to support blogs, calendars and task organization
  • 30.
    Wordpress Familiarity Statistics easy totrack A blog helped create a Web presence
  • 32.
    Facebook Web presence Status updatesallowed us to gain more interest
  • 34.
    SurveyMonkey Our bread andbutter Without dedicated survey tool, survey would have been much less successful
  • 37.
    E-mail/Text Message We livedon this for group communication Most comfortable zone for group
  • 38.
    The Why (LikeThe Who, but less musical) Kept tools to a minimum required Only used what we needed
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Lessons Learned Surveys…MORE PEOPLE!!!! Facultyunresponsive Talk to university No plan survives first contact If it doesn’t work, ditch it Student projects are not always “important”

Editor's Notes

  • #10 SU students - undergraduates mostly Other universities - We ourselves were stakeholders, the reason we picked this project it was something that interested all of us. They use Blackboard on a daily basis and are just as affected by the changes of online communication as students are. Common threads between all of the stakeholder groups
  • #11 All are in an academic mindset, meaning our full time job is being a student, majority of our time is focused on school Range from faculty who may not be as computer savvy to members of our group who are the most internet/computer savvy of the bunch