SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 80
Download to read offline
2017 Edelman
Trust Barometer
Ireland
1
Informed
Public
9 years in 20+ markets
Represents 13% of total global population
500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200
in all other countries
Must meet 4 criteria:
Ages 25-64
College educated
In top 25% of household income per
age group in each country
Report significant media consumption
and engagement in business news
General Online
Population
6 years in 25+ markets
Ages 18+
1,150 respondents
per country
All slides show General
Online Population unless
otherwise noted
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer
Methodology
28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000+). Country-
specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500),
Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
2
17 years of data
33,000+ respondents total
All fieldwork was conducted
between October 13th and
November 16th, 2016
Online Survey in
28 Countries
Mass
Population
All population not including
Informed Public
Represents 87% of total
global population
Trust in Retrospect
3
Rising Influence
of NGOs
2001
Business Must
Partner with
Government to
Regain Trust
2009
Fall of the
Celebrity CEO
2002
Earned Media
More Credible
Than Advertising
2003
U.S. Companies
in Europe Suffer
Trust Discount
2004
Trust Shifts from
“Authorities” to
Peers
2005
“A Person Like
Me” Emerges as
Credible
Spokesperson
2006
Business More
Trusted Than
Government
and Media
2007
Young Influencers
Have More Trust
in Business
2008
Trust is Now an
Essential Line
of Business
2010
Rise of
Authority
Figures
2011
Fall of
Government
2012
Crisis of
Leadership
2013
Business to
Lead the Debate
for Change
2014
Trust is
Essential to
Innovation
2015
Trust
in Crisis
2017
Growing
Inequality of Trust
2016
2016: The Inversion of Influence
4
Mass
Population
85% of
population
39 Trust Index
15% of
population
49 Trust Index
Informed
Public
10pt
Gap
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed
Public and Mass Population, Ireland.
2017: Trust Gap Decreases Slightly
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
Informed Public and Mass Population, Ireland.
5
Percent trust in the four institutions of government,
business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2017
21 pts
19 pts
18 pts
42
49
44
33
39
35
2012 2016 2017
Informed
Public
9pt
Gap
9pt
Gap
A 1-point
decrease in
the last year
10pt
Gap
Largest Gaps
Mass
Population
45 Global
70 India
67 Indonesia
62 China
59 Singapore
59 UAE
52 Netherlands
50 Colombia
50 Mexico
47 Brazil
47 Canada
47 Italy
47 Malaysia
47 U.S.
45 Argentina
42 Hong Kong
41 S. Africa
41 Spain
41 Turkey
40 Australia
39 Germany
38 France
37 U.K.
36 S. Korea
36 Sweden
35 Ireland
34 Japan
34 Poland
31 Russia
Trust Index
Mass Population
Left Behind
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs. Mass Population
The Mass Population
distrusts
their institutions in
20 of 28 countries
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global
total.
Mass
Population
Informed
Public
6
60 Global
80 India
79 China
78 Indonesia
77 UAE
71 Singapore
68 U.S.
62 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Italy
61 Mexico
57 Malaysia
57 Spain
56 France
56 U.K.
55 Colombia
54 Australia
54 Germany
53 Hong Kong
51 Argentina
51 Brazil
50 S. Korea
50 Turkey
49 Japan
49 S. Africa
47 Sweden
45 Russia
44 Ireland
43 Poland
Trusters
(60-100)
Neutrals
(50-59)
Distrusters
(1-49)
2017: Mass Population Rejects Established Authority
7
Mass population now has influence
and authority
Establishment left empty-handed
Influence
& Authority
Trust
in Crisis
How much do you
trust each institution
to do what is right?
49
43
39
32
43 41
29 32
Trust in Three Institutions Declines
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q11-620. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,
Ireland.
10
Percent trust in the four institutions of government,
business, media and NGOs, 2016 vs. 2017
Business MediaNGOs Government
50%
Neutral
Trusted
Distrusted
-6 -2 -10 0
20172016
All four institutions distrusted
45 Global
70 India
67 Indonesia
62 China
59 Singapore
59 UAE
52 Netherlands
50 Colombia
50 Mexico
47 Brazil
47 Canada
47 Italy
47 Malaysia
47 U.S.
45 Argentina
42 Hong Kong
41 S. Africa
41 Spain
41 Turkey
40 Australia
39 Germany
38 France
37 U.K.
36 S. Korea
36 Sweden
35 Ireland
34 Japan
34 Poland
31 Russia
Trust Index
Mass Population
Left Behind
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs. Mass Population
The Mass Population
distrusts
their institutions in
20 of 28 countries
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global
total.
Mass
Population
Informed
Public
11
60 Global
80 India
79 China
78 Indonesia
77 UAE
71 Singapore
68 U.S.
62 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Italy
61 Mexico
57 Malaysia
57 Spain
56 France
56 U.K.
55 Colombia
54 Australia
54 Germany
53 Hong Kong
51 Argentina
51 Brazil
50 S. Korea
50 Turkey
49 Japan
49 S. Africa
47 Sweden
45 Russia
44 Ireland
43 Poland
Trusters
(60-100)
Neutrals
(50-59)
Distrusters
(1-49)
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q130-747 Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample.
12
Credibility of Leadership in Crisis
Percent who rate each spokesperson as very/extremely credible
CEOs
27%
Credible
Government
Officials
27%
Credible
37
18
23 23 24 25 26 27 27 27 28 28 28
31
34
36
38
40 40
42 43 44
48 48
51 52
55
61
70
Global
28-Country
Japan
France
Poland
S.Korea
Canada
Australia
HongKong
Ireland
Netherlands
Germany
Italy
U.K.
Sweden
Russia
Singapore
U.S.
Malaysia
Spain
Argentina
Turkey
China
Brazil
Colombia
Indonesia
S.Africa
UAE
Mexico
India
All-time Low for CEO Credibility
Source: 2017 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-747Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each
person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General
Population,28-country global total, question asked of half the sample.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
13
Percent rate CEOs as extremely/very credible, 2016 vs. 2017
CEOs not credible in 23 countries
50%
-12 -15 -8-7 -12-16-6-16-18-13-17-10-16-5-14-10 -10 -12 -11 -15-12 -13 -19 -7-9 -12 -11-12 -16
Declines in all 28 countries
Y-to-Y Change+−
NeutralDistrust Trust
The System
Is Broken
Without Trust,
Belief in the System Fails
15
How true are each of the following?
Sense of Injustice
Desire for Change
Need forceful reformers to bring change
Lack of Confidence
No confidence in current leaders
Lack of Hope
Hard work not rewarded, children will not
have a better life, country not moving in
right direction
System biased in favour of elites, elites
indifferent to the people, getting richer than
they deserve
How true is
this for you?
Sense of injustice
Lack of hope
Lack of confidence
Desire for change
59%
26%
15%
Majority Believe the
System is Failing Them
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. Ireland. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the
Technical Appendix.
16
Not at all true
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1 in 4 are uncertain
Completely true
System failing System working
More than
Even Those at the Top Are Disillusioned
Percent who believe the system is not working
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. S8. Thinking about your annual household income in 2015, which of the following categories best describes your total
household income that year? S7. What is the last grade in school you completed? S9. How often do you follow public policy matters in the news? S10. How often do
you follow business news and information? General Population, Ireland, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’.
High-Income College-Educated Well-Informed
Top quartile of income College degree or higher
Follow business and public policy
information several times a week or more
55% 59% 56%
7
Trust Critical to Belief in the System
Average trust in institutions
18
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q11-Q14. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
General Population, Ireland, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’.
Trust differentiates those
who are uncertain and
those who believe the
system is failing them
Trust Index
49
Trust Index
43
Trust Index
30
Among those
who believe the
System
is Working
Among those
who are
Uncertain
Among those
who believe the
System
is Failing
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q672-675,678-680, 688-690.
For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated,please refer to the TechnicalAppendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtractedfrom
the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. Countries were considered below the
global average if their score was lower than the global mean minus the margin of error. All other scores were considered aligned. 19
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Uncertain 32 22 24 25 24 25 25 25 27 26 29 30 26 33 33 30 29 29 37 31 28 41 40 45 45 50 43 47 40
In 14 countries, the percent of
population that has lost faith is
above the global average
Systemic loss of faith
restricted to Western-
style democracies1 in 2 Countries Have Lost
Faith in the System
Percent of population who believe
the system is not working
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average
Fears
Fuel the Fire
The Cycle of Fear and Distrust
21
Corruption Globalisation Eroding Social Values Immigration Pace of Innovation
Widespread corruption
Compromising the safety of
our citizens
Makes it difficult to institute the
changes necessary to solve our
problems
Protect our jobs from
foreign competition
Foreign companies/influence
damaging our economy/
national culture
Foreign corporations favour their
home country
Most countries cannot be
trusted to engage in fair
trade practices
Values that made this country
great are disappearing
Society changing too quickly and
not in ways that benefit people
like me
Influx of people from other
countries damaging our economy
and national culture
Technological innovations
happening too quickly and leading
to changes not good for
people like me
Concerns Have Become Fears
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalisation Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation
Q677. Ireland. For details on how the societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix.
22
Percent of respondents who are concerned or fearful regarding each issue
54% Concerned
26% Fearful
38% Concerned
17% Fearful
45% Concerned
20% Fearful
43% Concerned
16% Fearful
42% Concerned
18% Fearful
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalisation Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-
690. Ireland. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix.
23
Fears Further Erode
Belief in the System
Percent of respondents with various fears
who also believe the system has failed them
When fears collide
with a belief that
the system is
failing, conditions
are ripe for
populist action
Corruption Globalisation
Eroding
Social Values
Immigration
Pace of
Innovation
89 80 82 69 71
Systemic Distrust and Fear Trigger Action
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. CorruptionQ685-687,GlobalisationQ681-684,Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685,Pace of innovation Q677. System is
failing: Q672-675,678-680, 688-690.For details on how the societal fears and the “systemfailing” measure were calculated,please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of
error for the countries scores was added and subtractedfrom the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean
plus the margin of error. 24
% Who Agree
System is Failing
53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
Above-Average Level of Fear
Above-Average Belief the
System is Failing
Countries with Multiple
Fears and Failing System
10 countries with above-
average belief the system
is failing and multiple fears
4 countries with above-
average belief the system is
failing – but lack multiple fears
Corruption
Immigration
Globalisation
Eroding social values
Pace of change
11
34
A Case in Point: U.S.
25
Trust Barometer Supplement: Post-U.S. Election Flash Poll,
1,000+ General Population Respondents, Nov. 28 to Dec. 11, 2016
Trump Voters Clinton Voters
25
42
67%
are fearful
45%
are fearful
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust U.S. Flash Poll Q14. Who did you vote for? Audience: U.S. General Population, grouped by “system failing” segments and level of fear
from the Trust Barometer. For details on how systemic distrust and societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondents were labeled
as “fearful” if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalisation, eroding social values, and pace of innovation.
System Failing
and Fearful Fearful
7
20
A Case in Point: U.K.
26
Trust Barometer Supplement: UK Supplement, 1,150 General
Population Respondents, December 23, 2016 to January, 7 2017
Leave
the EU
Remain
in the EU
54%
are fearful
27%
are fearful
Source: 2017 UK Trust Supplement Q15. Did you vote…? Audience: UK General Population,grouped by ‘system failing’ segments and level of fear from the Trust
Barometer. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated,please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondentswere
labeled as ‘fearful’ if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalisation,eroding social values, and pace of
innovation.
System Failing
and Fearful Fearful
LEAVE
10
44
The Echo
Chamber
Echo Chamber Amplifies Fears
and Accelerates the Cycle
28
29
The Echo Chamber in Action
Facts matter less Bias is the filter No humans needed
1 in 3 agree
“I would support politicians
I trust to make things better
for me and my family
even if they
exaggerated the truth”
45%
Do not regularly listen to
people or organisations
with whom they often
disagree
More than
2.5x more likely
to ignore information
that supports a position
they do not believe in
More likely
to believe
53%
Search
Engines
47%
Human
Editors
53%49% Never or rarely change their
position on important social issues
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q755 Have you ever changed your position on an important
social issue? (Sum of “Yes, but rarely”, “No, never”) General Population, Ireland. Q749. When someone you know provides you with some information that supports a position that you do NOT believe, which of following
do you typically do with it? Q752. How often do you read or listen to information or points of view from people, media sources or organisations with whom you often disagree? (Sum of “Never”, “Almost Never”, “Several
Times a year”, “Once or Twice a Month”) Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for presenting information, or a different style of
communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to
select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample.
More than
2012 2017
Traditional media 60 56
Search engines* 58 55
Online-only
media**
36 41
Social media 33 27
Owned media 26 26
Media as an
institution
35 29
Social Media and Media as an Institution Show Steepest Declines
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for
general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.”
(Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample
*From 2012-2015, “Online Search Engines” were included as a media type. In 2016, this was changed to “Search Engines.”
**From 2012-2015, “Hybrid Media” was included as a media type. In 2016, this was changed to “Online-Only media.”
Percent trust in each source for general news and information
30
Change,
2012 - 2017
-4
-3
+5
-6
0
-6
Social media / Media
as an institution
down 6 points
56
41
27
55
26
29
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different
format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is
giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most
likely to be true most often. General Population, Ireland, choices shown to half the sample. 31
Official Sources Are Suspect
Percent who find each source more believable than its pair
68%
Individuals
32%
Institutions
74%
Reformer
26%
Preserver of
Status Quo
76%
Leaked
Information
24%
Company Press
Statements
1
61 58
54
51
45
39
27 27 27
Academic
expert
Technical
expert
Apersonlike
yourself
Employee
Financial
industry
analyst
NGO
representative
CEO
Boardof
directors
Government
official/
regulator
Peers More Credible than CEOs and Government Officials
Source: 2017 Edelman. Trust Barometer. Q130-747 Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample.
32
Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible,
and change from 2016 to 2017
CEO credibility decreased the
most, dropping to an all-time low
-5 -6 -5 -3 -9 -7 -16 -12 -6
Y-to-Y Change+−
Business
on Notice
Business Plays a Role in Stoking Societal Fears
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q693-762. Some people say they worry about many things while others say they have few concerns. We are interested in
what you worry about. Specifically, how much do you worry about each of the following? Please indicate your answer using a nine point scale where one means “I do
not worry about this at all” and nine means “I am extremely worried about this”. (Top 4 Box, Worried) Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate
how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Ireland. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development
and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the
sample.
34
Global population worries about
losing their jobs due to:
43% globalisation
is taking us in the
wrong direction
41% the pace of change
in business and industry is
too fast
37%
37%
39%
44%
49%
Jobs moving to cheaper markets
Automation
Immigrants who work for less
Foreign competitors
Lack of training/skills
Support for Anti-Business Policies
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q709-718 For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General
Population, Ireland.
35
Nearly 1in3agree 60%agree 65%agree
Protectionism Slower Growth
“The government
should protect our
jobs and local
industries, even if
it means that our
economy grows
more slowly.”
“We need to
prioritise the
interests of our
country over those
of the rest of the
world.”
“We should not
enter into free
trade agreements
because they hurt
our country’s
workers.”
Protectionism
License to Operate at Risk
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q667-670. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q661-
664. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q658. For the statement below, please indicate how
much you agree or disagree. (All respondents except Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Ireland, question asked of one-fifth the sample.
36
73%agree that the
pharmaceutical
industry needs
more regulations
59%agree that policy
makers should
tax foods that negatively
impact health
63%do not agree that
financial market reforms
have increased
economic stability
Regulation ReformTax Policy
37
Business Expected
to Lead
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q249-757. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General
Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample.
.
68% agree
“A company can take specific
actions that both increase
profits and improve the economic
and social conditions in the
community where it operates.”
Business
Must Act
39
NGOs 41 46 48
Business 35 45 56
Media 24 36 38
Government 20 45 56
Most Trusted
NGO’s is the most trusted among
the more than 1 in 4 who are
uncertain about the system
Business Most, or Second Most Trusted Institution NeutralDistrust Trust
% trust in each
institution
Among those
who believe the
System
is Working
Among those
who are
Uncertain
Among those
who believe the
System
is Failing
Most Trusted
Most Trusted
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q11-620. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,
Ireland, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’.
Most Trusted
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q732. What can businesses do that would cause the most damage to your trust in a better future?
(Please select up to five.) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample.
40
First, Do No Harm
Actions business can take that would most damage
trust in a better future (top 5 most-selected)
1.
Pay bribes to
government
officials to
win contracts
2.
Pay
executives
hundreds of
times more
than workers
3.
Overcharge
for products
that people
need to live
4.
Move profits
to other
countries to
avoid taxes
5.
Move jobs
from here to
cheaper
labour
markets
When the System is Failing,
Companies Must Do More
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale
where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2
Box, Importance) Data displayed is mean Top 2 Box rating for the listed items. Items were included if they were considered important by 50% or more of those
who believe the system is failing. General Population, Ireland and cut by “the system is failing segments”. 41
Percent who rate each attribute as important in building trust in a company
(top 5 most important shown)
57
58
59
59
63
66
67
68
69
75
Has ethical business practices
Offers high quality products or
services
Listens to customer needs and
feedback
Pays its fair share of taxes
Treats employees well
Among those who have
lost faith in the system,
expectations are higher
across the board
On average
+10pts
higher expectations
System Failing
General Population
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer
42
And Do Things Differently
Identify
the
business
need
Assess
need
relative to
economic
and
societal
fear(s)
1
Learn
without
bias
2
Provide
context
Advocate
Act
3
Engage
openly
Partnerships/
programs to address
societal issues
Business practices/
crisis handling
Financial earnings &
operational
performance
Employees Most Credible On Nearly Every Topic
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q610. Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational
performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611. A company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612. A company’s employee
programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritises customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613. A company’s partnerships
with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614. A company’s innovation efforts and new product development?
Q615. A company’s stand on issues related to the industry in which it operates? General Population, Ireland, question asked of one-quarter of the sample.
43
Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic
Innovation effortsTreatment of
employees/customers
Views on
industry issues
Company CEO
Senior executive
Employee
Activist consumer
Academic
Media spokesperson
9
15 14
17
21
12
16
21
17
29
21 20
64
38
35
33
36
32
28 27
30 29 28
35
25
31
35
29 30 31
11
9 8 9
13 13
Which is more believable?
Talk With, Not At
44
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a
different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are
more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two
options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Ireland, choices shown to half the sample.
57%
Personal
experience
43%
Data
66%
Spontaneous
speaker
34%
Rehearsed
speaker
52%
Blunt and
outspoken
48%
Diplomatic
and polite
54%
Company’s
social media
46%
Advertising
With the People,
Not For the People
A Fundamental Shift
46
Current
Tension
Old Model:
For the People
New Model:
With the People
Elites manage
institutions to
do things “for”
the people
Influence has
shifted to the
people; people
using influence to
reject established
authority
Institutions
working
with the people;
institutional silos
dissolved
Influence
& Authority
Influence
& Authority
Influence
& Authority
With the People:
The New Integrated
Operating Model
47
Integrity 56 27 29
Has Ethical Business Practices 57 28 29
Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 56 27 29
Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 54 25 29
Engagement 57 27 30
Treats Employees Well 63 31 32
Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 59 29 30
Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 54 25 29
Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 51 24 27
Products 46 28 18
Offers High Quality Products Or Services 58 31 27
Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 33 26 7
Purpose 41 22 19
Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 50 26 24
Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 43 23 20
Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 40 20 20
Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 31 18 13
Operations 30 22 8
Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 32 22 10
Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 28 22 6
Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 29 23 6
The Trust-building Attributes
Company Importance vs. Performance
%
Performance
%
Importance Gap
48
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust
Barometer. Q80-639. How important
is each of the following attributes to
building your TRUST in a company?
Use a 9-point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all important to
building your trust” and nine means it
is “extremely important to building
your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-654. Please rate
businesses in general on how well
you think they are performing on each
of the following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means they are
"performing extremely poorly" and
nine means they are "performing
extremely well". (Top 2 Box,
Performance) General Population,
Ireland.
Additional Dimensions that Inform Business Trust
Company Importance vs. Performance
%
Performance
%
Importance Gap
49
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust
Barometer. Q80-639. How important
is each of the following attributes to
building your TRUST in a company?
Use a 9-point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all important to
building your trust” and nine means it
is “extremely important to building
your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-654. Please rate
businesses in general on how well
you think they are performing on each
of the following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means they are
"performing extremely poorly" and
nine means they are "performing
extremely well". (Top 2 Box,
Performance) General Population,
Ireland.
Employee Empowerment 40 22 18
Empowers its employees to make decisions 41 21 20
Regular employees have a lot of influence in how the company is run 35 21 14
Supports employees joining worker’s/trade unions or other organisations that represent their interests 44 23 21
Diversity 35 20 15
Has a lot of ethnic diversity within its management team 29 20 9
Has a lot of gender diversity within its management team 37 19 18
Has a lot of diversity when it comes to attitudes, values and points of view within its management team 38 21 17
Citizenship 48 27 21
It creates many new jobs 41 27 14
The profits it makes in this country stay in this country 44 25 19
Pays its fair share of taxes 59 30 29
Leadership 29 19 10
The CEO gets personally involved in societal issues 29 18 11
The CEO is compensated based on the ability to produce sustainable, long-term growth 31 21 10
I know who the CEO is and what he or she stands for 28 17 11
Relationship Building 36 20 16
Invites the public to contribute to and help shape their products, services or policies 33 20 13
Has a public image or heritage that I can appreciate and relate to 34 20 14
Actively encourages and facilitates conversations and interactions with the public 40 21 19
Thank You
1
Supplementary Data
Trust in Institutions
67
62
35
42 44
54
57
60
63 64 64 64 66 67 67 69 70 70 70 70 71 73 73 73 74 74 75 76 78 79
Global28
GDP5
Russia
Sweden
Japan
Ireland
Germany
Poland
Netherlands
Brazil
Turkey
U.K.
Australia
Colombia
S.Africa
S.Korea
Argentina
HongKong
Indonesia
Malaysia
France
China
Italy
U.S.
Canada
Spain
UAE
Singapore
Mexico
India
Trust in NGOs Steady
Among Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][NGOsIN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution
to do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
52
Percent trust in NGOs, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public
Trusted in 23 countries
50%
-10 -11 +2+4 0+4+6+7+1+1-1-1+4+6-5+3 -6 -1 -3 -3-4 +1 -1 +5-2 +4 -60 -1 -2
Declines in 14 countries
Y-to-Y Change+−
NeutralDistrust Trust
53
56
30 32
35 36
39 40
44 44 45 47 49 49 49 49 51 52 52 52 53 55 55
58
64 66 66
73
77 78
Global28
GDP5
Turkey
Ireland
Sweden
Russia
Poland
Australia
Argentina
France
Japan
U.K.
Colombia
Germany
Malaysia
S.Africa
Spain
Brazil
Canada
Netherlands
HongKong
Italy
S.Korea
Mexico
U.S.
Singapore
UAE
India
China
Indonesia
Sharp Decreases in Media Trust
Among Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][MEDIA IN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution
to do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
53
Percent trust in media, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public
Distrusted in 14 countries
50%
0 -4 +8-1 0-2-3+5-14+30-7-9-12-2-5 -13 0 -10 -8+5 -14 -12 +6-15 -1 -2-4 0 -5
Declines in 19 countries
Y-to-Y Change+−
NeutralDistrust Trust
65 65
40
44 46 47 48
52 53 53 55
58 60
63 64 65 65 66 67 68 69 71 72 72 74
78 80 81 83 84
Global28
GDP5
S.Korea
HongKong
Ireland
Poland
Argentina
Germany
Sweden
Turkey
Japan
Russia
Australia
U.K.
Canada
Netherlands
Spain
Singapore
Brazil
Malaysia
S.Africa
France
Colombia
Italy
U.S.
Mexico
UAE
China
Indonesia
India
Business Trust Increases
for Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][BUSINESSIN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that
institutionto do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust)
Informed Public,28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
54
Percent trust in Business, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public
Trusted in 18 countries
50%
+12 +3 -3+3 +1+7-6+4+4-9-6+1-8-2+6+12 -5 +3 +4 +3-7 +5 +7 +10+1 -5 -5+2 +5 +3
Increases in 18 countries
Y-to-Y Change+−
NeutralDistrust Trust
53
62
12
23 23
30 32
35 37
40 41 43 43 44 45
51 52 52 53 54
57 58 58
63
70
76
81 83
86 87
Global28
GDP5
S.Africa
Poland
Brazil
Mexico
Colombia
S.Korea
Spain
France
Argentina
HongKong
Malaysia
Ireland
Italy
Australia
Russia
U.K.
Japan
Turkey
Germany
Canada
Sweden
U.S.
Netherlands
Singapore
Indonesia
India
China
UAE
Government Trust Increases
for Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][GOVERNMENTIN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that
institutionto do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust)
Informed Public,28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
55
Percent trust in Government, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public
Distrusted in 13 countries
50%
-7 0 +5-3 +6+150+7+80+12+8+12-3-1-4 +9 +3 +10 -9-3 -3 +5 +14+1 -7 -13+2 +6 0
Increases in 14 countries
Y-to-Y Change+−
NeutralDistrust Trust
39
57
46
51
69
60
United Nations Most Trusted
Multinational Institution
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-
point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population,
28-country global total.
*The European Union is only asked of 11 European Countries.
56
Percent trust in the three new institutions of the
European Union, United Nations and International Monetary Fund
Informed
Public
General
Population
European Union* United Nations International
Monetary Fund
57 55
33 35
38
46 46
49 50 51 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 57 58 59 60 62 62
66 68 69
73
77 78
82
Global28
GDP5
Turkey
Russia
Japan
France
Germany
Argentina
Poland
Spain
Ireland
Malaysia
S.Africa
Australia
Italy
UAE
U.K.
Sweden
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Singapore
S.Korea
Brazil
HongKong
Colombia
Mexico
China
Indonesia
India
Trusted or Neutral in 22 countries
50%
The U.N. Neutral or Trusted in Most Countries
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE UNITEDNATIONS]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do
what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General
Population,28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
57
Percent trust in the United Nations
NeutralDistrust Trust
69 68
36
50 52
55 55
58
61 61 63 64 65 66 67 67
70 72 72 72 73 74 75 76 76 76
81 83 85
89
Global28
GDP5
Turkey
Russia
Japan
Poland
Argentina
Malaysia
France
S.Africa
Germany
Ireland
Australia
Sweden
Italy
Spain
U.K.
U.S.
Singapore
S.Korea
Colombia
UAE
Netherlands
Brazil
Canada
HongKong
Mexico
Indonesia
China
India
Trusted or Neutral in 27 countries
50%
The U.N. Trusted Among Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE UNITEDNATIONS]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do
what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public,
28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
58
Percent trust in the United Nations, Informed Public
NeutralDistrust Trust
46 46
28 29 30 32 32 33 34 35 37 39 39 40 40 41 42 43 45
50 52 53 53
57 58 59 61 63
74
79
Global28
GDP5
Turkey
Argentina
Russia
Germany
Ireland
Spain
France
Sweden
Poland
Australia
Japan
Canada
U.K.
Italy
S.Africa
U.S.
Netherlands
S.Korea
Malaysia
Brazil
UAE
Colombia
Mexico
HongKong
Singapore
Indonesia
China
India
Distrusted in 17 countries
50%
I.M.F. Distrusted In Most Countries
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE IMF] Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right
using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-
country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
59
Percent trust in the International Monetary Fund
NeutralDistrust Trust
60
63
32 32
40
44 45 46
49 50
53 53
57 57 58 58 58
61 62 63 64 65 66 68
71 72 72
76
85
91
Global28
GDP5
Argentina
Turkey
Russia
Spain
Poland
Ireland
Germany
Sweden
France
Italy
Australia
Canada
Japan
S.Africa
S.Korea
Brazil
U.K.
Colombia
U.S.
Malaysia
Netherlands
Singapore
HongKong
Indonesia
Mexico
UAE
China
India
50%
I.M.F. Trusted Among Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE IMF] Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right
using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public, 28-country
global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
60
Percent trust in the International Monetary Fund, Informed Public
NeutralDistrust Trust
Trusted or Neutral in 21 countries
39
22
30
35 37 38 40 42 43 45 46 48
Global11
Russia
Turkey
U.K.
France
Sweden
Germany
Italy
Ireland
Netherlands
Poland
Spain
Distrusted in all 11 EU countries
The European Union Distrusted
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE EUROPEANUNION]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do
what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General
Population,11-country global total. This institutionwas only asked of eleven European countries.
61
Percent trust in the European Union
NeutralDistrust Trust
50%
51
34
37
48 50 52 52 54 54 55
61
64
Global11
Russia
Turkey
Sweden
France
Italy
Poland
Germany
Ireland
U.K.
Netherlands
Spain
The European Union Neutral or
Trusted Among Informed Public
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE EUROPEANUNION]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do
what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public,
11-country global total. This institutionwas only asked of eleven European countries.
62
Percent trust in the European Union, Informed Public
NeutralDistrust Trust
Trusted or Neutral in 8 countries
50%
Supplementary Data
Structural Factors that Inform Trust in Business
Family Business and
Employee-Owned Most Trusted
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q15-17G.Thinking about different types of businesses,please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using
a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country
global total and across regions, question asked of half the sample.
64
Trust in different types of business structures
55
68
52
67
Global
62 58 59
65
Asia Pacific
45
74
47
69
EU
57
81
52
81
North America
62
76
45
70
Latin America
Public companies
Family-owned
State-owned
Employee-owned
44
74
46
71
Ireland
30
32 32
34
43
48 48
55 56
60 61 61
64 64
68 68 68
Mexico
Brazil
India
China
S.Korea
Italy
Spain
U.S.
France
Japan
Netherlands
U.K.
Australia
Germany
Canada
Sweden
Switzerland
Companies Headquartered in
Developed Markets More Trusted
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q26-Q422.Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries.Please indicate how much you trust
global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same nine-pointscale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine
means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,25-country global total, countries shown to half the sample.
65
Trust in companies headquartered in each country, and change from 2013 to 2017
+1+4+7 +11-2 +8 0 +1n/a +6+7+5-3+3+2+2+45-Year
Trend
NeutralDistrust Trust
5-Year Trend+−
Think Local, Act Local
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q15-17G.Thinking about different types of businesses,please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using
a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country
global total, question asked of half the sample.
66
Foreign companies trusted in
only 7 countries:
India 75%
China 74%
Indonesia 74%
Brazil 66%
Mexico 65%
Colombia 64%
UAE 62%
40%
Trust foreign
companies
45%
“Trust companies
headquartered in my
country”
33
43 44
48 48 49 50 51 51
54 54 55 56
59
64
FINANCIAL
SERVICES
FASHION
TELECOMMUNICAT
IONS
AUTOMOTIVE
CONSUMER
PACKAGEDGOODS
ENERGY
ENTERTAINMENT
HEALTHCARE
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
MANUFACTURING
RETAIL
FOODAND
BEVERAGE
TRANSPORTATION
TECHNOLOGY
EDUCATION
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429.Please indicate how much you trust businessesin each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the
same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country
global total.
Only Education Sector Trusted
67
Percent who trust each industry
NeutralDistrust Trust
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Sector Trends
No Sectoral Trust in 2017
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429.Please indicate how much you trust businessesin each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the
same nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,25-country
global total.
68
Trust in each industry sector, 2012-2017
Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
6 yr.
Trend
Technology 68% 61% 67% 65% 67% 59%
9
Food & Beverage 60% 55% 60% 59% 60% 55%
5
Automotive 45% 52% 57% 55% 48% 48%
3
Consumer Packaged Goods 49% 47% 49% 52% 52% 48%
1
Telecommunications 51% 44% 52% 48% 49% 44%
7
Energy 46% 42% 44% 47% 50% 49%
3
Financial Services 18% 18% 23% 29% 36% 33%
15
NeutralDistrust Trust
Supplementary Data
Trust Matters
78
62
43
49
33
10
most trusted
content creators#1
Friends and
Family
60
56
29
23
42
6
Trust Matters
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589.Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you trust/do
not trust? (Yes Summary) Q598-609.Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following authors or content
creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) Q178-182.When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please
use a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country global
total, question asked of half the sample.
70
Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust
Behaviours for Distrusted Companies Behaviours for Trusted Companies
Refused to buy products/services
Criticised companies
Shared negative opinions
Disagreed with defenders of company
Paid more than
wanted
Sold shares
Chose to buy products/services
Recommended them to a friend/colleague
Shared positive opinions online
Defended company
Paid more
Bought shares
most trusted
media source#1
Online Search
Engines
Behaviours for
Trusted Companies
Behaviours for
Distrusted Companies
A Good Reputation Does Not Guarantee Trust
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249-757.Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements.(Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population,28-
country global total, question asked of half the sample.
71
47% agree
“There are many companies
with good reputations that I
personally do not trust.”
Supplementary Data
The System is Broken
Even Those At the Top Are Disillusioned
Percent who believe the system is not working by management-level
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer S421. Which of the following best describes your position or level within your company or organisation?General Population,28-country
global total, cut by ‘system failing’ measure. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated,please refer to the Technical Appendix.
Non-Management Middle Management Upper Management
Experienced non-manager, entry
level, self-employed, other
Mid-level management (director, senior
manager, etc.), lower-level management
(supervisor, associate manager, etc.)
Senior executive level (CEO, president,
etc.), executive level (general manager,
executive vice president, executive
director, etc.), upper-level management
(senior vice president, vice president,
senior director, etc.)
53% 61% 60%
28
Older Generations Are More Disillusioned
Percent who believe the system is not working by generation
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer S1. What is your current age? General Population,28-country global total, cut by ‘system failing’ measure. For details on how the “system
failing” measure was calculated,please refer to the TechnicalAppendix.
Gen Z Gen Y Gen X Boomers Matures
18-20 21-34 35-49 50-64 65+
31% 46% 63% 73% 66%
29
Supplementary Data
Societal Fears
Corruption Threatens
Safety and Prevents
Solutions
76
Fear of corruption, ranked by the percent of
population who believe the system is failing them
2 of 11 markets with corruption
fears are developed nations: Italy
and Spain
Developed markets not immune
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
% who fear corruption 40 34 60 74 69 55 34 70 69 24 25 23 26 41 20 23 17 68 58 39 49 28 65 16 52 24 10 30 21
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalisation Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. System is failing: Q672-
675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores
was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
Immigration Damaging
Economy and Culture
77
Fear of immigration, ranked by the percent of
population who believe the system is failing them
58% Worry about immigrants who will work for less
46% Government should close borders
46% Would support politicians they trust to make things
better even if they expressed extreme attitudes
toward foreigners or specific ethnic groups
44% Many immigrants are lower-quality people who
should be sent back to where they came from
Respondents agree
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
% who fear immigration 28 36 38 21 39 22 25 19 26 25 35 34 17 39 29 28 28 31 34 30 37 17 30 13 37 22 27 21 23
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Immigration Q685. Q696. Immigrants who will work for less competing for your job (Top 4 Box, Worried) Q713. The government needs to shut our borders to
outsiders in order to ensure our safety and prosperity Q711. I would support politicians I trust to make things better for me and my family even if they expressed extreme attitudes toward foreigners or
people from specific ethnic groups Q714. Many immigrants are lower-quality people who should be sent back to where they came from (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population, 28-country global total.
System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the
countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
Backlash Against
Globalisation
78
Fear of globalisation, ranked by the percent of
population who believe the system is failing them
Globalisation is taking us
in the wrong direction
50% agree
foreign companies
52%
do not trust
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
% who fear globalisation 27 35 37 27 26 26 27 22 31 22 29 35 16 40 24 30 20 33 26 27 38 20 36 13 36 15 17 18 20
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Globalisation Q681-684. Q716. Globalisation is taking us in the wrong direction (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, 28-country global total. Q15-17G.
Thinking about different types of businesses, please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all”
and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (All respondents except Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample.. System is failing: Q672-
675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores
was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
Traditional Values
Eroding Too Quickly
79
Fear of eroding social change, ranked by the
percent of population who believe the system is
failing system
the pace of change in our
cultural and social values
is too fast
56%
agree:
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
% fear eroding social values 25 29 29 34 35 30 20 27 32 27 31 28 20 36 28 25 24 29 24 28 21 15 24 10 31 14 16 13 15
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Eroding social values Q676 and Q758. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development and change and select the
response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. For details on how the societal fears
and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries
were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
Pace of Innovation
Too Fast
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Pace of innovation Q677. Q693. Automation and/or other innovations taking your job away (Top 4 Box Worried) General Population, 28-country
global total. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4
Box, Too Fast) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the
“system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries
were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
80
Fear of innovation, ranked by the percent of
population who believe the system is failing them
the pace of change in business
and industry today is too fast
53%
agree
automation or other
innovations taking their job
54%
worry about
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
% who fear innovation 22 23 23 27 17 23 13 25 26 20 25 23 18 31 22 23 16 22 21 27 16 16 24 10 35 15 21 19 29
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average

More Related Content

What's hot

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman_UK
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult Edition
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult EditionEdelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult Edition
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult EditionEdelman_UK
 
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust BarometerEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007edelman.milan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEnergy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEdelman_UK
 
Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016
Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016
Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016Edelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash PollEdelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash PollEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust BarometerDaniel Roth
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust BarometerMatthew Gain
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential ElectionEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 

What's hot (20)

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult Edition
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult EditionEdelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult Edition
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017: Young Adult Edition
 
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEnergy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
 
Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016
Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016
Edelman and The Marketing Institute of Ireland Social Media Survey 2016
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash PollEdelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
 

Viewers also liked

2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global ResultsEdelman
 
A Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform Era
A Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform EraA Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform Era
A Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform EraBloomberg Media
 
FrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech française
FrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech françaiseFrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech française
FrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech françaiseFrenchWeb.fr
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheLeslie Samuel
 
The Marketer's Guide To Customer Interviews
The Marketer's Guide To Customer InterviewsThe Marketer's Guide To Customer Interviews
The Marketer's Guide To Customer InterviewsGood Funnel
 
Deep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech Talks
Deep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech TalksDeep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech Talks
Deep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech TalksAmazon Web Services
 
Solving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report Consolidation
Solving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report ConsolidationSolving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report Consolidation
Solving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report Consolidationibi
 
Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...
Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...
Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...dhaine
 
Un Buen Médico de Familia.
Un Buen Médico de Familia.Un Buen Médico de Familia.
Un Buen Médico de Familia.Teresa Mateu
 
EKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänä
EKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänäEKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänä
EKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänäSuomen Pankki
 
Maailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huolia
Maailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huoliaMaailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huolia
Maailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huoliaSuomen Pankki
 
Linuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイント
Linuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイントLinuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイント
Linuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイントuchan_nos
 
ODOO Restaurant Management POS
ODOO Restaurant Management POSODOO Restaurant Management POS
ODOO Restaurant Management POSHusen Daudi
 
IoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and Traceability
IoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and TraceabilityIoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and Traceability
IoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and TraceabilitySjaak Wolfert
 
The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...
The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...
The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...IL Group (CILIP Information Literacy Group)
 
Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017
Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017
Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017AMEC
 

Viewers also liked (17)

2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
 
A Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform Era
A Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform EraA Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform Era
A Publisher's Survival Guide for the Platform Era
 
FrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech française
FrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech françaiseFrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech française
FrenchWeb 500, le classement des entreprises de la tech française
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
 
The Marketer's Guide To Customer Interviews
The Marketer's Guide To Customer InterviewsThe Marketer's Guide To Customer Interviews
The Marketer's Guide To Customer Interviews
 
Future of Work
Future of WorkFuture of Work
Future of Work
 
Deep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech Talks
Deep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech TalksDeep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech Talks
Deep Dive on Amazon Cognito - March 2017 AWS Online Tech Talks
 
Solving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report Consolidation
Solving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report ConsolidationSolving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report Consolidation
Solving the BI Adoption Challenge With Report Consolidation
 
Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...
Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...
Sampling Strategies to Control Misclassification Bias in Longitudinal Udder H...
 
Un Buen Médico de Familia.
Un Buen Médico de Familia.Un Buen Médico de Familia.
Un Buen Médico de Familia.
 
EKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänä
EKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänäEKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänä
EKP:n rahapolitiikka jatkuu poikkeuksellisen keveänä
 
Maailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huolia
Maailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huoliaMaailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huolia
Maailmantaloudessa suotuisaa kehitystä ja uusia huolia
 
Linuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイント
Linuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイントLinuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイント
Linuxカーネルモジュール自作入門 kprobesでカーネル空間ブレークポイント
 
ODOO Restaurant Management POS
ODOO Restaurant Management POSODOO Restaurant Management POS
ODOO Restaurant Management POS
 
IoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and Traceability
IoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and TraceabilityIoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and Traceability
IoF2020 project overview for S3 platform Big Data and Traceability
 
The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...
The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...
The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning - ...
 
Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017
Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017
Informe amec coyuntura 2016 perspectivas 2017
 

Similar to 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisBrandwatch
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global ResultsEdelman
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Soymimarca
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Italia
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf instituteChristina Fuhr, Ph.D.
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa ReportEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global ReportJesper Andersen
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 

Similar to 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer (20)

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
 
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 

More from Edelman

Dmx 5 learnings
Dmx 5 learningsDmx 5 learnings
Dmx 5 learningsEdelman
 
#DMXDublin - The Twitter Story
#DMXDublin - The Twitter Story #DMXDublin - The Twitter Story
#DMXDublin - The Twitter Story Edelman
 
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust BarometerEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learnings
Edelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learningsEdelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learnings
Edelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learningsEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 IrelandEdelman Trust Barometer 2011 Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 IrelandEdelman
 
goodpurpose 2010
goodpurpose 2010goodpurpose 2010
goodpurpose 2010Edelman
 

More from Edelman (6)

Dmx 5 learnings
Dmx 5 learningsDmx 5 learnings
Dmx 5 learnings
 
#DMXDublin - The Twitter Story
#DMXDublin - The Twitter Story #DMXDublin - The Twitter Story
#DMXDublin - The Twitter Story
 
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learnings
Edelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learningsEdelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learnings
Edelman Trust Barometer 2013 Ireland learnings
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 IrelandEdelman Trust Barometer 2011 Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 Ireland
 
goodpurpose 2010
goodpurpose 2010goodpurpose 2010
goodpurpose 2010
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...lizamodels9
 
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...ictsugar
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...lizamodels9
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024christinemoorman
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Riya Pathan
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckHajeJanKamps
 
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Timedelhimodelshub1
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfKhaled Al Awadi
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Pereraictsugar
 
Lean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… Abridged
Lean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… AbridgedLean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… Abridged
Lean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… AbridgedKaiNexus
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,noida100girls
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?Olivia Kresic
 
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionFuture Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionMintel Group
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Seta Wicaksana
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
 
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
 
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
 
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
 
Lean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… Abridged
Lean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… AbridgedLean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… Abridged
Lean: From Theory to Practice — One City’s (and Library’s) Lean Story… Abridged
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
 
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information TechnologyCorporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
 
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionFuture Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
 

2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer

  • 2. Informed Public 9 years in 20+ markets Represents 13% of total global population 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries Must meet 4 criteria: Ages 25-64 College educated In top 25% of household income per age group in each country Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news General Online Population 6 years in 25+ markets Ages 18+ 1,150 respondents per country All slides show General Online Population unless otherwise noted 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Methodology 28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000+). Country- specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). 2 17 years of data 33,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between October 13th and November 16th, 2016 Online Survey in 28 Countries Mass Population All population not including Informed Public Represents 87% of total global population
  • 3. Trust in Retrospect 3 Rising Influence of NGOs 2001 Business Must Partner with Government to Regain Trust 2009 Fall of the Celebrity CEO 2002 Earned Media More Credible Than Advertising 2003 U.S. Companies in Europe Suffer Trust Discount 2004 Trust Shifts from “Authorities” to Peers 2005 “A Person Like Me” Emerges as Credible Spokesperson 2006 Business More Trusted Than Government and Media 2007 Young Influencers Have More Trust in Business 2008 Trust is Now an Essential Line of Business 2010 Rise of Authority Figures 2011 Fall of Government 2012 Crisis of Leadership 2013 Business to Lead the Debate for Change 2014 Trust is Essential to Innovation 2015 Trust in Crisis 2017 Growing Inequality of Trust 2016
  • 4. 2016: The Inversion of Influence 4 Mass Population 85% of population 39 Trust Index 15% of population 49 Trust Index Informed Public 10pt Gap Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and Mass Population, Ireland.
  • 5. 2017: Trust Gap Decreases Slightly Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and Mass Population, Ireland. 5 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2017 21 pts 19 pts 18 pts 42 49 44 33 39 35 2012 2016 2017 Informed Public 9pt Gap 9pt Gap A 1-point decrease in the last year 10pt Gap Largest Gaps Mass Population
  • 6. 45 Global 70 India 67 Indonesia 62 China 59 Singapore 59 UAE 52 Netherlands 50 Colombia 50 Mexico 47 Brazil 47 Canada 47 Italy 47 Malaysia 47 U.S. 45 Argentina 42 Hong Kong 41 S. Africa 41 Spain 41 Turkey 40 Australia 39 Germany 38 France 37 U.K. 36 S. Korea 36 Sweden 35 Ireland 34 Japan 34 Poland 31 Russia Trust Index Mass Population Left Behind Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. Mass Population The Mass Population distrusts their institutions in 20 of 28 countries Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. Mass Population Informed Public 6 60 Global 80 India 79 China 78 Indonesia 77 UAE 71 Singapore 68 U.S. 62 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Italy 61 Mexico 57 Malaysia 57 Spain 56 France 56 U.K. 55 Colombia 54 Australia 54 Germany 53 Hong Kong 51 Argentina 51 Brazil 50 S. Korea 50 Turkey 49 Japan 49 S. Africa 47 Sweden 45 Russia 44 Ireland 43 Poland Trusters (60-100) Neutrals (50-59) Distrusters (1-49)
  • 7. 2017: Mass Population Rejects Established Authority 7 Mass population now has influence and authority Establishment left empty-handed Influence & Authority
  • 9. How much do you trust each institution to do what is right?
  • 10. 49 43 39 32 43 41 29 32 Trust in Three Institutions Declines Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q11-620. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Ireland. 10 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2016 vs. 2017 Business MediaNGOs Government 50% Neutral Trusted Distrusted -6 -2 -10 0 20172016 All four institutions distrusted
  • 11. 45 Global 70 India 67 Indonesia 62 China 59 Singapore 59 UAE 52 Netherlands 50 Colombia 50 Mexico 47 Brazil 47 Canada 47 Italy 47 Malaysia 47 U.S. 45 Argentina 42 Hong Kong 41 S. Africa 41 Spain 41 Turkey 40 Australia 39 Germany 38 France 37 U.K. 36 S. Korea 36 Sweden 35 Ireland 34 Japan 34 Poland 31 Russia Trust Index Mass Population Left Behind Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. Mass Population The Mass Population distrusts their institutions in 20 of 28 countries Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. Mass Population Informed Public 11 60 Global 80 India 79 China 78 Indonesia 77 UAE 71 Singapore 68 U.S. 62 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Italy 61 Mexico 57 Malaysia 57 Spain 56 France 56 U.K. 55 Colombia 54 Australia 54 Germany 53 Hong Kong 51 Argentina 51 Brazil 50 S. Korea 50 Turkey 49 Japan 49 S. Africa 47 Sweden 45 Russia 44 Ireland 43 Poland Trusters (60-100) Neutrals (50-59) Distrusters (1-49)
  • 12. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q130-747 Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample. 12 Credibility of Leadership in Crisis Percent who rate each spokesperson as very/extremely credible CEOs 27% Credible Government Officials 27% Credible
  • 13. 37 18 23 23 24 25 26 27 27 27 28 28 28 31 34 36 38 40 40 42 43 44 48 48 51 52 55 61 70 Global 28-Country Japan France Poland S.Korea Canada Australia HongKong Ireland Netherlands Germany Italy U.K. Sweden Russia Singapore U.S. Malaysia Spain Argentina Turkey China Brazil Colombia Indonesia S.Africa UAE Mexico India All-time Low for CEO Credibility Source: 2017 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-747Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population,28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 13 Percent rate CEOs as extremely/very credible, 2016 vs. 2017 CEOs not credible in 23 countries 50% -12 -15 -8-7 -12-16-6-16-18-13-17-10-16-5-14-10 -10 -12 -11 -15-12 -13 -19 -7-9 -12 -11-12 -16 Declines in all 28 countries Y-to-Y Change+− NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 15. Without Trust, Belief in the System Fails 15 How true are each of the following? Sense of Injustice Desire for Change Need forceful reformers to bring change Lack of Confidence No confidence in current leaders Lack of Hope Hard work not rewarded, children will not have a better life, country not moving in right direction System biased in favour of elites, elites indifferent to the people, getting richer than they deserve
  • 16. How true is this for you? Sense of injustice Lack of hope Lack of confidence Desire for change 59% 26% 15% Majority Believe the System is Failing Them Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. Ireland. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. 16 Not at all true 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 in 4 are uncertain Completely true System failing System working More than
  • 17. Even Those at the Top Are Disillusioned Percent who believe the system is not working Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. S8. Thinking about your annual household income in 2015, which of the following categories best describes your total household income that year? S7. What is the last grade in school you completed? S9. How often do you follow public policy matters in the news? S10. How often do you follow business news and information? General Population, Ireland, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’. High-Income College-Educated Well-Informed Top quartile of income College degree or higher Follow business and public policy information several times a week or more 55% 59% 56% 7
  • 18. Trust Critical to Belief in the System Average trust in institutions 18 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q11-Q14. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. General Population, Ireland, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’. Trust differentiates those who are uncertain and those who believe the system is failing them Trust Index 49 Trust Index 43 Trust Index 30 Among those who believe the System is Working Among those who are Uncertain Among those who believe the System is Failing
  • 19. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q672-675,678-680, 688-690. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated,please refer to the TechnicalAppendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtractedfrom the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. Countries were considered below the global average if their score was lower than the global mean minus the margin of error. All other scores were considered aligned. 19 Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Uncertain 32 22 24 25 24 25 25 25 27 26 29 30 26 33 33 30 29 29 37 31 28 41 40 45 45 50 43 47 40 In 14 countries, the percent of population that has lost faith is above the global average Systemic loss of faith restricted to Western- style democracies1 in 2 Countries Have Lost Faith in the System Percent of population who believe the system is not working Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average
  • 21. The Cycle of Fear and Distrust 21
  • 22. Corruption Globalisation Eroding Social Values Immigration Pace of Innovation Widespread corruption Compromising the safety of our citizens Makes it difficult to institute the changes necessary to solve our problems Protect our jobs from foreign competition Foreign companies/influence damaging our economy/ national culture Foreign corporations favour their home country Most countries cannot be trusted to engage in fair trade practices Values that made this country great are disappearing Society changing too quickly and not in ways that benefit people like me Influx of people from other countries damaging our economy and national culture Technological innovations happening too quickly and leading to changes not good for people like me Concerns Have Become Fears Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalisation Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. Ireland. For details on how the societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix. 22 Percent of respondents who are concerned or fearful regarding each issue 54% Concerned 26% Fearful 38% Concerned 17% Fearful 45% Concerned 20% Fearful 43% Concerned 16% Fearful 42% Concerned 18% Fearful
  • 23. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalisation Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688- 690. Ireland. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. 23 Fears Further Erode Belief in the System Percent of respondents with various fears who also believe the system has failed them When fears collide with a belief that the system is failing, conditions are ripe for populist action Corruption Globalisation Eroding Social Values Immigration Pace of Innovation 89 80 82 69 71
  • 24. Systemic Distrust and Fear Trigger Action Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. CorruptionQ685-687,GlobalisationQ681-684,Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685,Pace of innovation Q677. System is failing: Q672-675,678-680, 688-690.For details on how the societal fears and the “systemfailing” measure were calculated,please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtractedfrom the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. 24 % Who Agree System is Failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE Above-Average Level of Fear Above-Average Belief the System is Failing Countries with Multiple Fears and Failing System 10 countries with above- average belief the system is failing and multiple fears 4 countries with above- average belief the system is failing – but lack multiple fears Corruption Immigration Globalisation Eroding social values Pace of change
  • 25. 11 34 A Case in Point: U.S. 25 Trust Barometer Supplement: Post-U.S. Election Flash Poll, 1,000+ General Population Respondents, Nov. 28 to Dec. 11, 2016 Trump Voters Clinton Voters 25 42 67% are fearful 45% are fearful Source: 2017 Edelman Trust U.S. Flash Poll Q14. Who did you vote for? Audience: U.S. General Population, grouped by “system failing” segments and level of fear from the Trust Barometer. For details on how systemic distrust and societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondents were labeled as “fearful” if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalisation, eroding social values, and pace of innovation. System Failing and Fearful Fearful
  • 26. 7 20 A Case in Point: U.K. 26 Trust Barometer Supplement: UK Supplement, 1,150 General Population Respondents, December 23, 2016 to January, 7 2017 Leave the EU Remain in the EU 54% are fearful 27% are fearful Source: 2017 UK Trust Supplement Q15. Did you vote…? Audience: UK General Population,grouped by ‘system failing’ segments and level of fear from the Trust Barometer. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated,please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondentswere labeled as ‘fearful’ if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalisation,eroding social values, and pace of innovation. System Failing and Fearful Fearful LEAVE 10 44
  • 28. Echo Chamber Amplifies Fears and Accelerates the Cycle 28
  • 29. 29 The Echo Chamber in Action Facts matter less Bias is the filter No humans needed 1 in 3 agree “I would support politicians I trust to make things better for me and my family even if they exaggerated the truth” 45% Do not regularly listen to people or organisations with whom they often disagree More than 2.5x more likely to ignore information that supports a position they do not believe in More likely to believe 53% Search Engines 47% Human Editors 53%49% Never or rarely change their position on important social issues Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q755 Have you ever changed your position on an important social issue? (Sum of “Yes, but rarely”, “No, never”) General Population, Ireland. Q749. When someone you know provides you with some information that supports a position that you do NOT believe, which of following do you typically do with it? Q752. How often do you read or listen to information or points of view from people, media sources or organisations with whom you often disagree? (Sum of “Never”, “Almost Never”, “Several Times a year”, “Once or Twice a Month”) Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample. More than
  • 30. 2012 2017 Traditional media 60 56 Search engines* 58 55 Online-only media** 36 41 Social media 33 27 Owned media 26 26 Media as an institution 35 29 Social Media and Media as an Institution Show Steepest Declines Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample *From 2012-2015, “Online Search Engines” were included as a media type. In 2016, this was changed to “Search Engines.” **From 2012-2015, “Hybrid Media” was included as a media type. In 2016, this was changed to “Online-Only media.” Percent trust in each source for general news and information 30 Change, 2012 - 2017 -4 -3 +5 -6 0 -6 Social media / Media as an institution down 6 points 56 41 27 55 26 29 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
  • 31. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Ireland, choices shown to half the sample. 31 Official Sources Are Suspect Percent who find each source more believable than its pair 68% Individuals 32% Institutions 74% Reformer 26% Preserver of Status Quo 76% Leaked Information 24% Company Press Statements
  • 32. 1 61 58 54 51 45 39 27 27 27 Academic expert Technical expert Apersonlike yourself Employee Financial industry analyst NGO representative CEO Boardof directors Government official/ regulator Peers More Credible than CEOs and Government Officials Source: 2017 Edelman. Trust Barometer. Q130-747 Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample. 32 Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible, and change from 2016 to 2017 CEO credibility decreased the most, dropping to an all-time low -5 -6 -5 -3 -9 -7 -16 -12 -6 Y-to-Y Change+−
  • 34. Business Plays a Role in Stoking Societal Fears Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q693-762. Some people say they worry about many things while others say they have few concerns. We are interested in what you worry about. Specifically, how much do you worry about each of the following? Please indicate your answer using a nine point scale where one means “I do not worry about this at all” and nine means “I am extremely worried about this”. (Top 4 Box, Worried) Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Ireland. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample. 34 Global population worries about losing their jobs due to: 43% globalisation is taking us in the wrong direction 41% the pace of change in business and industry is too fast 37% 37% 39% 44% 49% Jobs moving to cheaper markets Automation Immigrants who work for less Foreign competitors Lack of training/skills
  • 35. Support for Anti-Business Policies Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q709-718 For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Ireland. 35 Nearly 1in3agree 60%agree 65%agree Protectionism Slower Growth “The government should protect our jobs and local industries, even if it means that our economy grows more slowly.” “We need to prioritise the interests of our country over those of the rest of the world.” “We should not enter into free trade agreements because they hurt our country’s workers.” Protectionism
  • 36. License to Operate at Risk Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q667-670. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q661- 664. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q658. For the statement below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (All respondents except Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Ireland, question asked of one-fifth the sample. 36 73%agree that the pharmaceutical industry needs more regulations 59%agree that policy makers should tax foods that negatively impact health 63%do not agree that financial market reforms have increased economic stability Regulation ReformTax Policy
  • 37. 37 Business Expected to Lead Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q249-757. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample. . 68% agree “A company can take specific actions that both increase profits and improve the economic and social conditions in the community where it operates.”
  • 39. 39 NGOs 41 46 48 Business 35 45 56 Media 24 36 38 Government 20 45 56 Most Trusted NGO’s is the most trusted among the more than 1 in 4 who are uncertain about the system Business Most, or Second Most Trusted Institution NeutralDistrust Trust % trust in each institution Among those who believe the System is Working Among those who are Uncertain Among those who believe the System is Failing Most Trusted Most Trusted Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q11-620. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Ireland, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’. Most Trusted
  • 40. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q732. What can businesses do that would cause the most damage to your trust in a better future? (Please select up to five.) General Population, Ireland, question asked of half the sample. 40 First, Do No Harm Actions business can take that would most damage trust in a better future (top 5 most-selected) 1. Pay bribes to government officials to win contracts 2. Pay executives hundreds of times more than workers 3. Overcharge for products that people need to live 4. Move profits to other countries to avoid taxes 5. Move jobs from here to cheaper labour markets
  • 41. When the System is Failing, Companies Must Do More Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Data displayed is mean Top 2 Box rating for the listed items. Items were included if they were considered important by 50% or more of those who believe the system is failing. General Population, Ireland and cut by “the system is failing segments”. 41 Percent who rate each attribute as important in building trust in a company (top 5 most important shown) 57 58 59 59 63 66 67 68 69 75 Has ethical business practices Offers high quality products or services Listens to customer needs and feedback Pays its fair share of taxes Treats employees well Among those who have lost faith in the system, expectations are higher across the board On average +10pts higher expectations System Failing General Population
  • 42. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer 42 And Do Things Differently Identify the business need Assess need relative to economic and societal fear(s) 1 Learn without bias 2 Provide context Advocate Act 3 Engage openly
  • 43. Partnerships/ programs to address societal issues Business practices/ crisis handling Financial earnings & operational performance Employees Most Credible On Nearly Every Topic Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q610. Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611. A company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612. A company’s employee programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritises customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613. A company’s partnerships with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614. A company’s innovation efforts and new product development? Q615. A company’s stand on issues related to the industry in which it operates? General Population, Ireland, question asked of one-quarter of the sample. 43 Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic Innovation effortsTreatment of employees/customers Views on industry issues Company CEO Senior executive Employee Activist consumer Academic Media spokesperson 9 15 14 17 21 12 16 21 17 29 21 20 64 38 35 33 36 32 28 27 30 29 28 35 25 31 35 29 30 31 11 9 8 9 13 13
  • 44. Which is more believable? Talk With, Not At 44 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Ireland, choices shown to half the sample. 57% Personal experience 43% Data 66% Spontaneous speaker 34% Rehearsed speaker 52% Blunt and outspoken 48% Diplomatic and polite 54% Company’s social media 46% Advertising
  • 45. With the People, Not For the People
  • 46. A Fundamental Shift 46 Current Tension Old Model: For the People New Model: With the People Elites manage institutions to do things “for” the people Influence has shifted to the people; people using influence to reject established authority Institutions working with the people; institutional silos dissolved Influence & Authority Influence & Authority Influence & Authority
  • 47. With the People: The New Integrated Operating Model 47
  • 48. Integrity 56 27 29 Has Ethical Business Practices 57 28 29 Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 56 27 29 Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 54 25 29 Engagement 57 27 30 Treats Employees Well 63 31 32 Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 59 29 30 Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 54 25 29 Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 51 24 27 Products 46 28 18 Offers High Quality Products Or Services 58 31 27 Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 33 26 7 Purpose 41 22 19 Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 50 26 24 Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 43 23 20 Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 40 20 20 Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 31 18 13 Operations 30 22 8 Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 32 22 10 Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 28 22 6 Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 29 23 6 The Trust-building Attributes Company Importance vs. Performance % Performance % Importance Gap 48 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Q114-654. Please rate businesses in general on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a 9- point scale where one means they are "performing extremely poorly" and nine means they are "performing extremely well". (Top 2 Box, Performance) General Population, Ireland.
  • 49. Additional Dimensions that Inform Business Trust Company Importance vs. Performance % Performance % Importance Gap 49 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Q114-654. Please rate businesses in general on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a 9- point scale where one means they are "performing extremely poorly" and nine means they are "performing extremely well". (Top 2 Box, Performance) General Population, Ireland. Employee Empowerment 40 22 18 Empowers its employees to make decisions 41 21 20 Regular employees have a lot of influence in how the company is run 35 21 14 Supports employees joining worker’s/trade unions or other organisations that represent their interests 44 23 21 Diversity 35 20 15 Has a lot of ethnic diversity within its management team 29 20 9 Has a lot of gender diversity within its management team 37 19 18 Has a lot of diversity when it comes to attitudes, values and points of view within its management team 38 21 17 Citizenship 48 27 21 It creates many new jobs 41 27 14 The profits it makes in this country stay in this country 44 25 19 Pays its fair share of taxes 59 30 29 Leadership 29 19 10 The CEO gets personally involved in societal issues 29 18 11 The CEO is compensated based on the ability to produce sustainable, long-term growth 31 21 10 I know who the CEO is and what he or she stands for 28 17 11 Relationship Building 36 20 16 Invites the public to contribute to and help shape their products, services or policies 33 20 13 Has a public image or heritage that I can appreciate and relate to 34 20 14 Actively encourages and facilitates conversations and interactions with the public 40 21 19
  • 52. 67 62 35 42 44 54 57 60 63 64 64 64 66 67 67 69 70 70 70 70 71 73 73 73 74 74 75 76 78 79 Global28 GDP5 Russia Sweden Japan Ireland Germany Poland Netherlands Brazil Turkey U.K. Australia Colombia S.Africa S.Korea Argentina HongKong Indonesia Malaysia France China Italy U.S. Canada Spain UAE Singapore Mexico India Trust in NGOs Steady Among Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][NGOsIN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 52 Percent trust in NGOs, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public Trusted in 23 countries 50% -10 -11 +2+4 0+4+6+7+1+1-1-1+4+6-5+3 -6 -1 -3 -3-4 +1 -1 +5-2 +4 -60 -1 -2 Declines in 14 countries Y-to-Y Change+− NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 53. 53 56 30 32 35 36 39 40 44 44 45 47 49 49 49 49 51 52 52 52 53 55 55 58 64 66 66 73 77 78 Global28 GDP5 Turkey Ireland Sweden Russia Poland Australia Argentina France Japan U.K. Colombia Germany Malaysia S.Africa Spain Brazil Canada Netherlands HongKong Italy S.Korea Mexico U.S. Singapore UAE India China Indonesia Sharp Decreases in Media Trust Among Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][MEDIA IN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 53 Percent trust in media, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public Distrusted in 14 countries 50% 0 -4 +8-1 0-2-3+5-14+30-7-9-12-2-5 -13 0 -10 -8+5 -14 -12 +6-15 -1 -2-4 0 -5 Declines in 19 countries Y-to-Y Change+− NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 54. 65 65 40 44 46 47 48 52 53 53 55 58 60 63 64 65 65 66 67 68 69 71 72 72 74 78 80 81 83 84 Global28 GDP5 S.Korea HongKong Ireland Poland Argentina Germany Sweden Turkey Japan Russia Australia U.K. Canada Netherlands Spain Singapore Brazil Malaysia S.Africa France Colombia Italy U.S. Mexico UAE China Indonesia India Business Trust Increases for Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][BUSINESSIN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public,28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 54 Percent trust in Business, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public Trusted in 18 countries 50% +12 +3 -3+3 +1+7-6+4+4-9-6+1-8-2+6+12 -5 +3 +4 +3-7 +5 +7 +10+1 -5 -5+2 +5 +3 Increases in 18 countries Y-to-Y Change+− NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 55. 53 62 12 23 23 30 32 35 37 40 41 43 43 44 45 51 52 52 53 54 57 58 58 63 70 76 81 83 86 87 Global28 GDP5 S.Africa Poland Brazil Mexico Colombia S.Korea Spain France Argentina HongKong Malaysia Ireland Italy Australia Russia U.K. Japan Turkey Germany Canada Sweden U.S. Netherlands Singapore Indonesia India China UAE Government Trust Increases for Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[TRACKING][GOVERNMENTIN GENERAL]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public,28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 55 Percent trust in Government, and change from 2016 to 2017, Informed Public Distrusted in 13 countries 50% -7 0 +5-3 +6+150+7+80+12+8+12-3-1-4 +9 +3 +10 -9-3 -3 +5 +14+1 -7 -13+2 +6 0 Increases in 14 countries Y-to-Y Change+− NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 56. 39 57 46 51 69 60 United Nations Most Trusted Multinational Institution Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine- point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, 28-country global total. *The European Union is only asked of 11 European Countries. 56 Percent trust in the three new institutions of the European Union, United Nations and International Monetary Fund Informed Public General Population European Union* United Nations International Monetary Fund
  • 57. 57 55 33 35 38 46 46 49 50 51 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 57 58 59 60 62 62 66 68 69 73 77 78 82 Global28 GDP5 Turkey Russia Japan France Germany Argentina Poland Spain Ireland Malaysia S.Africa Australia Italy UAE U.K. Sweden U.S. Netherlands Canada Singapore S.Korea Brazil HongKong Colombia Mexico China Indonesia India Trusted or Neutral in 22 countries 50% The U.N. Neutral or Trusted in Most Countries Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE UNITEDNATIONS]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 57 Percent trust in the United Nations NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 58. 69 68 36 50 52 55 55 58 61 61 63 64 65 66 67 67 70 72 72 72 73 74 75 76 76 76 81 83 85 89 Global28 GDP5 Turkey Russia Japan Poland Argentina Malaysia France S.Africa Germany Ireland Australia Sweden Italy Spain U.K. U.S. Singapore S.Korea Colombia UAE Netherlands Brazil Canada HongKong Mexico Indonesia China India Trusted or Neutral in 27 countries 50% The U.N. Trusted Among Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE UNITEDNATIONS]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 58 Percent trust in the United Nations, Informed Public NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 59. 46 46 28 29 30 32 32 33 34 35 37 39 39 40 40 41 42 43 45 50 52 53 53 57 58 59 61 63 74 79 Global28 GDP5 Turkey Argentina Russia Germany Ireland Spain France Sweden Poland Australia Japan Canada U.K. Italy S.Africa U.S. Netherlands S.Korea Malaysia Brazil UAE Colombia Mexico HongKong Singapore Indonesia China India Distrusted in 17 countries 50% I.M.F. Distrusted In Most Countries Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE IMF] Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28- country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 59 Percent trust in the International Monetary Fund NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 60. 60 63 32 32 40 44 45 46 49 50 53 53 57 57 58 58 58 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 72 72 76 85 91 Global28 GDP5 Argentina Turkey Russia Spain Poland Ireland Germany Sweden France Italy Australia Canada Japan S.Africa S.Korea Brazil U.K. Colombia U.S. Malaysia Netherlands Singapore HongKong Indonesia Mexico UAE China India 50% I.M.F. Trusted Among Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE IMF] Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 60 Percent trust in the International Monetary Fund, Informed Public NeutralDistrust Trust Trusted or Neutral in 21 countries
  • 61. 39 22 30 35 37 38 40 42 43 45 46 48 Global11 Russia Turkey U.K. France Sweden Germany Italy Ireland Netherlands Poland Spain Distrusted in all 11 EU countries The European Union Distrusted Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE EUROPEANUNION]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,11-country global total. This institutionwas only asked of eleven European countries. 61 Percent trust in the European Union NeutralDistrust Trust 50%
  • 62. 51 34 37 48 50 52 52 54 54 55 61 64 Global11 Russia Turkey Sweden France Italy Poland Germany Ireland U.K. Netherlands Spain The European Union Neutral or Trusted Among Informed Public Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620.[THE EUROPEANUNION]Below is a list of institutions.For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institutionto do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public, 11-country global total. This institutionwas only asked of eleven European countries. 62 Percent trust in the European Union, Informed Public NeutralDistrust Trust Trusted or Neutral in 8 countries 50%
  • 63. Supplementary Data Structural Factors that Inform Trust in Business
  • 64. Family Business and Employee-Owned Most Trusted Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q15-17G.Thinking about different types of businesses,please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country global total and across regions, question asked of half the sample. 64 Trust in different types of business structures 55 68 52 67 Global 62 58 59 65 Asia Pacific 45 74 47 69 EU 57 81 52 81 North America 62 76 45 70 Latin America Public companies Family-owned State-owned Employee-owned 44 74 46 71 Ireland
  • 65. 30 32 32 34 43 48 48 55 56 60 61 61 64 64 68 68 68 Mexico Brazil India China S.Korea Italy Spain U.S. France Japan Netherlands U.K. Australia Germany Canada Sweden Switzerland Companies Headquartered in Developed Markets More Trusted Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q26-Q422.Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries.Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same nine-pointscale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,25-country global total, countries shown to half the sample. 65 Trust in companies headquartered in each country, and change from 2013 to 2017 +1+4+7 +11-2 +8 0 +1n/a +6+7+5-3+3+2+2+45-Year Trend NeutralDistrust Trust 5-Year Trend+−
  • 66. Think Local, Act Local Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q15-17G.Thinking about different types of businesses,please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. 66 Foreign companies trusted in only 7 countries: India 75% China 74% Indonesia 74% Brazil 66% Mexico 65% Colombia 64% UAE 62% 40% Trust foreign companies 45% “Trust companies headquartered in my country”
  • 67. 33 43 44 48 48 49 50 51 51 54 54 55 56 59 64 FINANCIAL SERVICES FASHION TELECOMMUNICAT IONS AUTOMOTIVE CONSUMER PACKAGEDGOODS ENERGY ENTERTAINMENT HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MANUFACTURING RETAIL FOODAND BEVERAGE TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429.Please indicate how much you trust businessesin each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country global total. Only Education Sector Trusted 67 Percent who trust each industry NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 68. 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sector Trends No Sectoral Trust in 2017 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429.Please indicate how much you trust businessesin each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same nine-pointscale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,25-country global total. 68 Trust in each industry sector, 2012-2017 Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6 yr. Trend Technology 68% 61% 67% 65% 67% 59% 9 Food & Beverage 60% 55% 60% 59% 60% 55% 5 Automotive 45% 52% 57% 55% 48% 48% 3 Consumer Packaged Goods 49% 47% 49% 52% 52% 48% 1 Telecommunications 51% 44% 52% 48% 49% 44% 7 Energy 46% 42% 44% 47% 50% 49% 3 Financial Services 18% 18% 23% 29% 36% 33% 15 NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 70. 78 62 43 49 33 10 most trusted content creators#1 Friends and Family 60 56 29 23 42 6 Trust Matters Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589.Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you trust/do not trust? (Yes Summary) Q598-609.Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) Q178-182.When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. 70 Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust Behaviours for Distrusted Companies Behaviours for Trusted Companies Refused to buy products/services Criticised companies Shared negative opinions Disagreed with defenders of company Paid more than wanted Sold shares Chose to buy products/services Recommended them to a friend/colleague Shared positive opinions online Defended company Paid more Bought shares most trusted media source#1 Online Search Engines Behaviours for Trusted Companies Behaviours for Distrusted Companies
  • 71. A Good Reputation Does Not Guarantee Trust Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249-757.Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements.(Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population,28- country global total, question asked of half the sample. 71 47% agree “There are many companies with good reputations that I personally do not trust.”
  • 73. Even Those At the Top Are Disillusioned Percent who believe the system is not working by management-level Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer S421. Which of the following best describes your position or level within your company or organisation?General Population,28-country global total, cut by ‘system failing’ measure. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated,please refer to the Technical Appendix. Non-Management Middle Management Upper Management Experienced non-manager, entry level, self-employed, other Mid-level management (director, senior manager, etc.), lower-level management (supervisor, associate manager, etc.) Senior executive level (CEO, president, etc.), executive level (general manager, executive vice president, executive director, etc.), upper-level management (senior vice president, vice president, senior director, etc.) 53% 61% 60% 28
  • 74. Older Generations Are More Disillusioned Percent who believe the system is not working by generation Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer S1. What is your current age? General Population,28-country global total, cut by ‘system failing’ measure. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated,please refer to the TechnicalAppendix. Gen Z Gen Y Gen X Boomers Matures 18-20 21-34 35-49 50-64 65+ 31% 46% 63% 73% 66% 29
  • 76. Corruption Threatens Safety and Prevents Solutions 76 Fear of corruption, ranked by the percent of population who believe the system is failing them 2 of 11 markets with corruption fears are developed nations: Italy and Spain Developed markets not immune Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE % who fear corruption 40 34 60 74 69 55 34 70 69 24 25 23 26 41 20 23 17 68 58 39 49 28 65 16 52 24 10 30 21 System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalisation Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. System is failing: Q672- 675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
  • 77. Immigration Damaging Economy and Culture 77 Fear of immigration, ranked by the percent of population who believe the system is failing them 58% Worry about immigrants who will work for less 46% Government should close borders 46% Would support politicians they trust to make things better even if they expressed extreme attitudes toward foreigners or specific ethnic groups 44% Many immigrants are lower-quality people who should be sent back to where they came from Respondents agree Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE % who fear immigration 28 36 38 21 39 22 25 19 26 25 35 34 17 39 29 28 28 31 34 30 37 17 30 13 37 22 27 21 23 System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Immigration Q685. Q696. Immigrants who will work for less competing for your job (Top 4 Box, Worried) Q713. The government needs to shut our borders to outsiders in order to ensure our safety and prosperity Q711. I would support politicians I trust to make things better for me and my family even if they expressed extreme attitudes toward foreigners or people from specific ethnic groups Q714. Many immigrants are lower-quality people who should be sent back to where they came from (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population, 28-country global total. System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
  • 78. Backlash Against Globalisation 78 Fear of globalisation, ranked by the percent of population who believe the system is failing them Globalisation is taking us in the wrong direction 50% agree foreign companies 52% do not trust Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE % who fear globalisation 27 35 37 27 26 26 27 22 31 22 29 35 16 40 24 30 20 33 26 27 38 20 36 13 36 15 17 18 20 System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Globalisation Q681-684. Q716. Globalisation is taking us in the wrong direction (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, 28-country global total. Q15-17G. Thinking about different types of businesses, please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (All respondents except Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample.. System is failing: Q672- 675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
  • 79. Traditional Values Eroding Too Quickly 79 Fear of eroding social change, ranked by the percent of population who believe the system is failing system the pace of change in our cultural and social values is too fast 56% agree: Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE % fear eroding social values 25 29 29 34 35 30 20 27 32 27 31 28 20 36 28 25 24 29 24 28 21 15 24 10 31 14 16 13 15 System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Eroding social values Q676 and Q758. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error.
  • 80. Pace of Innovation Too Fast Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Pace of innovation Q677. Q693. Automation and/or other innovations taking your job away (Top 4 Box Worried) General Population, 28-country global total. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. 80 Fear of innovation, ranked by the percent of population who believe the system is failing them the pace of change in business and industry today is too fast 53% agree automation or other innovations taking their job 54% worry about Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE % who fear innovation 22 23 23 27 17 23 13 25 26 20 25 23 18 31 22 23 16 22 21 27 16 16 24 10 35 15 21 19 29 System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average