SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Your Trial Is Over—Now What?
Guidance on Perfecting and Pursuing
a State Civil Appeal
D. Todd Smith
Smith Law Group LLLP
www.appealsplus.com
David Hockema Civil Trial Law Conference
April 7, 2017
1
Overview:
• You have obtained a jury verdict or concluded a bench trial in
state trial court
• What are the critical next steps?
▫ Strategies for obtaining appellate attorney fees
▫ Formulating and opposing a final judgment
▫ Requesting FOF & COL
▫ Post-verdict preservation of error
▫ Enforcing and superseding the judgment
▫ Initial steps toward taking an appeal
2
Estimating Appellate Attorney Fees:
• Start thinking about this long before trial
▫ Pleadings → pray for fees through appeal
▫ Discovery → designate an appellate fee expert
• Often overlooked and underestimated
▫ Detrimental to your client
▫ Can establish client expectations you
don’t want
3
What’s the First Step
After You WIN?
Celebrate, of course!
4
Next Step: Take Off the Trial Goggles
5
“Dude, my case looks AWESOME with these on.”
Trial Goggles: Common Myths of
“Copy & Paste” and the “Two Step” Appeal
6
“My trial lawyer said that all the hard work has already been done,
and we’re TOTALLY going to win the appeal.”
Estimating Appellate Attorney Fees:
(cont’d)
• The “form book” problem
▫ $5,000 is not a sufficient award
▫ Lawyers and judges need to be broken of this mindset
• Amount depends on:
▫ Having a realistic view of the case – not just a repackaged view
▫ The basic steps required on appeal – not the Texas Two-Step
• Several factors to consider in estimate
▫ Pre- and post-judgment activities
▫ Perfecting appeal, pre-briefing activity, legal research, drafting and editing,
analyzing your opponent’s brief, etc.
▫ SCOTX proceedings, if any
▫ Post-appeal activity
• Even if you don’t get everything you ask for, the exercise is useful in
client counseling
7
The Actual Fee Award:
• Properly prove up and secure the award:
▫ Just like any fees: Sufficient evidence required!
▫ Consider bifurcating trial
▫ Award must be conditioned on appellate success
▫ Post-judgment interest is allowed on all attorney’s fees, but it
does not begin to accrue on appellate fees until the appellate
court renders judgment
• … Or successfully defend against the award
• Advise your client about realistic expectations and appellate
strategy
8
Crafting a Proposed Judgment:
• Should you file a motion for judgment?
▫ If you lost, and you’re the movant, approve as to form only and
use prefatory language (775 S.W.2d 632)
▫ Otherwise, risk waiving appellate rights
• Judgment elements
▫ Describe the parties and proceedings
▫ Relief awarded on the merits / election of remedies
▫ Attorney fees awarded – detailed breakdown
▫ Pre-and post-judgment interest – a (boring) CLE talk unto itself
▫ Costs
▫ Language of finality and execution
▫ Dated signature line for judge
9
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
• Beware! It’s more complicated
than you think.
• Remember the Big Picture/Purpose:
▫ Winner: Protect your winning judgment
▫ Loser: (1) Narrow the issues for appeal
(2) Let there be reversible error
▫ Both: Extend appellate deadlines (sometimes)
10
FOF/COL (cont’d)
If properly & timely requested, then:
• Appropriate & Required following
▫ Bench trials and
▫ Issues tried to the bench
• Appropriate but Discretionary following
▫ Appealable order/judgment upon evidentiary hearing
and
▫ Appealable interlocutory orders
• Family Code: special rules
11
FOF/COL (cont’d)
• Not appropriate to request, file, or
consider on appeal when:
▫ Judgment is rendered as a
matter of law on undisputed
material facts
▫ Non-evidentiary dismissals and defaults
• No extension of appellate deadlines
12
FOF/COL (cont’d)
• 1st Request: 20 days from Judgment
▫ Winner submits Proposed FOF/COL
▫ 1st Deadline for Entry: 20 days from Request
• 2nd Request: 30 days from Request
▫ “Past Due Notice”
▫ 2nd Deadline for Entry: 40 days from
original request
• 3rd Request: 10 days from Entry of FOF/COL
▫ “Request for Additional/Amended” (+ Objections?)
▫ 3rd Deadline for Entry: 10 days from 3rd Request
13
Post-Verdict Error Preservation:
• Most errors are preserved during trial
• But remember post-verdict preservation:
▫ TRAP 33.1
▫ TRCP 301, 324, 329b
• Jury trial: You MUST file a MNT (and pay the FEE) within 30
days of judgment to raise:
▫ Factual sufficiency
▫ Complaint on which evidence must be heard (i.e., jury misconduct or
newly discovered evidence)
▫ Inadequacy or excessiveness of damages
▫ Incurable jury argument not already ruled on
14
Post-Verdict Error Preservation (cont’d)
• Jury trial: To preserve legal sufficiency challenges, file:
▫ Motion for JNOV
▫ Motion to disregard the jury’s answer to a fact issue
▫ Motion for new trial specifically raising the complaint
▫ Preserved during trial by motion for directed verdict
or charge objection
• If a Motion for NEW TRIAL all you bring,
then a NEW TRIAL is the most you’ll get!
15
Superseding & Enforcing the Judgment:
• Perfecting appeal does NOT suspend!
• Methods
▫ Bond or cash deposit
▫ Written agreement
▫ Alternate security as ordered by the court
• Calculation of security for a money judgment:
▫ Compensatory damages awarded in the judgment
▫ Interest for the estimated duration of the appeal
▫ Costs awarded in the judgment
▫ But not attorney fees unless they are a separate element of
damages (sigh…)
16
Some Forthcoming Free Tools:
• supersedeascalculator.com
▫ Online form that calculates amount of security needed to
supersede a particular judgment
▫ Currently in development
• postjudgmentinterestcalculator.com
▫ Online form that calculates postjudgment interest and judgment
payoff amount
▫ Should go live any day
• Bookmark the sites for later reference or email
todd@appealsplus.com to get access when they are
available
17
Other Supersedeas Issues:
• Supersedeas caps
▫ LESSER of 50% debtor’s net worth
or $25M
▫ Net worth affidavit + TRAP 24.2(c)
= STAY pending a potential contest
▫ Negative net worth = Nø bond
▫ Makes it easier for debtors to appeal
• Adjustment of supersedeas amount
▫ Proof of “substantial economic harm” = deviate from formula
▫ Trial court retains jurisdiction to adjust amount and type of security
▫ Court of appeals can review on motion
18
He’s missing all
the important
stuff!
Commencement & Perfection of Appeal
19
Calculating the Deadline to Perfect Appeal:
• Runs from date that judgment or order is SIGNED
▫ TRAP 26.1, with limited exceptions
• Deadline varies by type of appeal
▫ Regular appeal: 30 days
▫ Accelerated appeal: 20 days
▫ Restricted appeal: 6 months
▫ Cross-appeal: 30 days from judgment
or 14 days from 1st NOA (if timely)
• Motion for extension of time is available
▫ TRAP 10.1, TRAP 26.3
20
Steps to Perfect Appeal:
• Notice of Appeal (TRAP 25.1(c))
▫ File in trial court only
▫ Special language required for:
 accelerated appeal
 restricted appeals
▫ Consider if cross-appeal is necessary
 (vs. cross-issue)
• Filing fee: $205
21
Other Initial Steps:
• Docketing Statement
▫ Was specific to each court’s website
▫ Now it is UNIFORM in all courts
▫ Download and complete electronically
▫ Must file “promptly” after NOA (TRAP 32)
• E-filing is now mandatory in appellate courts
▫ Read the rules to avoid getting bounced
▫ Redaction – watch for confidential information
▫ Court websites have helpful resources
22
Other Initial Steps (cont’d)
• Every Texas attorney is now required to register an email
address for service through the MyTexasBar page
23
Other Initial Steps(cont’d)
• Register for CaseMail (electronic updates)
as soon as the appeal is docketed to receive
notification of “case events”
24
Other Initial Steps(cont’d)
• Request Clerk’s & Reporter’s Records
▫ Written request, served on all parties
▫ Make arrangements to pay
▫ Specify contents – but don’t request unnecessary contents
▫ Can request supplementation
▫ Clerk has deadline to file, but often takes longer
▫ Briefing deadline runs from filing of record
25
Other Initial Steps(cont’d)
• Get a copy of the record
• CaseMail will tell you when filed
• But never pay a trial-court clerk or a court
reporter for the record
• Getting a copy by:
▫ Calling the appellate clerk and asking if they’ll
email or burn to disc
▫ Better yet, take advantage of the brand-new
Attorney Portal
26
Attorney Portal
27
Attorney Portal(cont’d)
28
Attorney Portal
29
Advising the Client About the Realistic
Expectations for Appeal:
• Two key questions:
1. Should we appeal?
2. If so, which issues
should we raise?
30
Expectations Analysis:
• Factors to consider:
▫ Standard of review
▫ Chances of success
▫ Likely costs / expenses
▫ Anticipated timing / overall duration
▫ Temperament of our potential panel on these issues
▫ Settlement possibilities and impact of appeal
31
Helpful Resources:
• Office of Court Administration website
▫ Statistics for every court in the state
▫ Dispositions and average times
• Reasons for Reversal
▫ Breaks down statistics
▫ By court and type of case
• An appellate lawyer!
32
And Remember…
33
Friends
Don’t Let
Friends
Appeal with
their Trial
Goggles On!
D. Todd Smith
Smith Law Group LLLP
www.appealsplus.com
34

More Related Content

Similar to 2017 04-07 ytio hockema cle slidedeck

Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Bryan Beel
 

Similar to 2017 04-07 ytio hockema cle slidedeck (20)

Builders liens in Canada
Builders liens in CanadaBuilders liens in Canada
Builders liens in Canada
 
Preparing for an Arbitration
Preparing for an ArbitrationPreparing for an Arbitration
Preparing for an Arbitration
 
DUBAI-DIAC Request For Arbitration in Construction Contracts Disputes (Real C...
DUBAI-DIAC Request For Arbitration in Construction Contracts Disputes (Real C...DUBAI-DIAC Request For Arbitration in Construction Contracts Disputes (Real C...
DUBAI-DIAC Request For Arbitration in Construction Contracts Disputes (Real C...
 
Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)
Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)
Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)
 
Stays of Litigation Pending Post-AIA Patent Review
Stays of Litigation Pending Post-AIA Patent ReviewStays of Litigation Pending Post-AIA Patent Review
Stays of Litigation Pending Post-AIA Patent Review
 
15th Annual Professional Responsibility Seminar
15th Annual Professional Responsibility Seminar 15th Annual Professional Responsibility Seminar
15th Annual Professional Responsibility Seminar
 
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
 
Cpc
CpcCpc
Cpc
 
Legal Info for AIBT International Students
Legal Info for AIBT International Students Legal Info for AIBT International Students
Legal Info for AIBT International Students
 
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2022_ Handling the Arbitration
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2022_ Handling the ArbitrationALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2022_ Handling the Arbitration
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2022_ Handling the Arbitration
 
Expert Determination Webinar by Chris Makin
Expert Determination Webinar by Chris MakinExpert Determination Webinar by Chris Makin
Expert Determination Webinar by Chris Makin
 
B-Brief - Bhatti and another v Ashgar and another
B-Brief - Bhatti and another v Ashgar and anotherB-Brief - Bhatti and another v Ashgar and another
B-Brief - Bhatti and another v Ashgar and another
 
Enforcing Adjudication Determinations
Enforcing Adjudication DeterminationsEnforcing Adjudication Determinations
Enforcing Adjudication Determinations
 
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
 
How to Avoid Claim Denials 2022 Updates
How to Avoid Claim Denials 2022 UpdatesHow to Avoid Claim Denials 2022 Updates
How to Avoid Claim Denials 2022 Updates
 
15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.
15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.
15 March 2016 - Law Institute of Victoria conference presentation.
 
Workshop on Understanding the Amended law of Service Tax dated 29.08.2014 Ses...
Workshop on Understanding the Amended law of Service Tax dated 29.08.2014 Ses...Workshop on Understanding the Amended law of Service Tax dated 29.08.2014 Ses...
Workshop on Understanding the Amended law of Service Tax dated 29.08.2014 Ses...
 
7b fraud presentation
7b fraud presentation7b fraud presentation
7b fraud presentation
 
Dean Wegner first time homebuyers presentation
Dean Wegner first time homebuyers presentationDean Wegner first time homebuyers presentation
Dean Wegner first time homebuyers presentation
 
Winning litigation strategies at court and arbitration
Winning litigation strategies at court and arbitration   Winning litigation strategies at court and arbitration
Winning litigation strategies at court and arbitration
 

More from D. Todd Smith

2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update
2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update
2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update
D. Todd Smith
 
2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck
2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck
2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck
D. Todd Smith
 
Aba real estate ppt (final)
Aba real estate ppt (final)Aba real estate ppt (final)
Aba real estate ppt (final)
D. Todd Smith
 
2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...
2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...
2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...
D. Todd Smith
 

More from D. Todd Smith (20)

2016 05-12 south texas cle jury charges
2016 05-12 south texas cle jury charges2016 05-12 south texas cle jury charges
2016 05-12 south texas cle jury charges
 
2015-09-11 Advanced Appellate MDL Presentation
2015-09-11 Advanced Appellate MDL Presentation2015-09-11 Advanced Appellate MDL Presentation
2015-09-11 Advanced Appellate MDL Presentation
 
TexasBarCLE Advanced Appellate Social Media Presentation
TexasBarCLE Advanced Appellate Social Media PresentationTexasBarCLE Advanced Appellate Social Media Presentation
TexasBarCLE Advanced Appellate Social Media Presentation
 
TYLA New Lawyer Talk
TYLA New Lawyer TalkTYLA New Lawyer Talk
TYLA New Lawyer Talk
 
Supersedeas Austin Bar 2015
Supersedeas Austin Bar 2015Supersedeas Austin Bar 2015
Supersedeas Austin Bar 2015
 
140226 TYLA Success Slidedeck
140226 TYLA Success Slidedeck140226 TYLA Success Slidedeck
140226 TYLA Success Slidedeck
 
Social Media and Ethics Rules: Dos and Don'ts
Social Media and Ethics Rules: Dos and Don'tsSocial Media and Ethics Rules: Dos and Don'ts
Social Media and Ethics Rules: Dos and Don'ts
 
2013 09-13 How to Handle Cross-Appeals
2013 09-13 How to Handle Cross-Appeals2013 09-13 How to Handle Cross-Appeals
2013 09-13 How to Handle Cross-Appeals
 
2013-06-20 Smith Ignite SBOT Slidedeck
2013-06-20 Smith Ignite SBOT Slidedeck2013-06-20 Smith Ignite SBOT Slidedeck
2013-06-20 Smith Ignite SBOT Slidedeck
 
2013 04-11 principled appellate decisions
2013 04-11 principled appellate decisions2013 04-11 principled appellate decisions
2013 04-11 principled appellate decisions
 
2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update
2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update
2013-01-10 Attorney Advertising Update
 
2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck
2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck
2012 federal court transitioning slidedeck
 
Aba real estate ppt (final)
Aba real estate ppt (final)Aba real estate ppt (final)
Aba real estate ppt (final)
 
2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...
2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...
2012 06-15 sbot using modern marketing tools in compliance with disciplinary ...
 
Standards of Review 2012
Standards of Review 2012Standards of Review 2012
Standards of Review 2012
 
Default Judgments Presentation
Default Judgments PresentationDefault Judgments Presentation
Default Judgments Presentation
 
Supersedeas Advanced 2012
Supersedeas Advanced 2012Supersedeas Advanced 2012
Supersedeas Advanced 2012
 
Adaptable Lawyer 2012 Slidedeck
Adaptable Lawyer 2012 SlidedeckAdaptable Lawyer 2012 Slidedeck
Adaptable Lawyer 2012 Slidedeck
 
Twitter Brief Competition Winners
Twitter Brief Competition WinnersTwitter Brief Competition Winners
Twitter Brief Competition Winners
 
Standards of Review 2011
Standards of Review 2011Standards of Review 2011
Standards of Review 2011
 

Recently uploaded

Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quizAgrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
gaelcabigunda
 
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.docNotes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
BRELGOSIMAT
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Debt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debt
Debt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debtDebt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debt
Debt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debt
 
The Main Procedures for Obtaining Cypriot Citizenship
The Main Procedures for Obtaining Cypriot CitizenshipThe Main Procedures for Obtaining Cypriot Citizenship
The Main Procedures for Obtaining Cypriot Citizenship
 
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law studentindian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
 
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsApplication of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
 
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on SocietyTypes of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
 
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quizAgrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
 
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxDNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
 
Donald_J_Trump_katigoritirio_stormi_daniels.pdf
Donald_J_Trump_katigoritirio_stormi_daniels.pdfDonald_J_Trump_katigoritirio_stormi_daniels.pdf
Donald_J_Trump_katigoritirio_stormi_daniels.pdf
 
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal CourtAbdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
 
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.docNotes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
 
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaSolidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
 
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of JusticeBook review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
 
EMPLOYMENT LAW AN OVERVIEW in Malawi.pptx
EMPLOYMENT LAW  AN OVERVIEW in Malawi.pptxEMPLOYMENT LAW  AN OVERVIEW in Malawi.pptx
EMPLOYMENT LAW AN OVERVIEW in Malawi.pptx
 
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
 
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdfALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
 
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxPRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
 
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
 
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
 
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxRIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
 
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
 

2017 04-07 ytio hockema cle slidedeck

  • 1. Your Trial Is Over—Now What? Guidance on Perfecting and Pursuing a State Civil Appeal D. Todd Smith Smith Law Group LLLP www.appealsplus.com David Hockema Civil Trial Law Conference April 7, 2017 1
  • 2. Overview: • You have obtained a jury verdict or concluded a bench trial in state trial court • What are the critical next steps? ▫ Strategies for obtaining appellate attorney fees ▫ Formulating and opposing a final judgment ▫ Requesting FOF & COL ▫ Post-verdict preservation of error ▫ Enforcing and superseding the judgment ▫ Initial steps toward taking an appeal 2
  • 3. Estimating Appellate Attorney Fees: • Start thinking about this long before trial ▫ Pleadings → pray for fees through appeal ▫ Discovery → designate an appellate fee expert • Often overlooked and underestimated ▫ Detrimental to your client ▫ Can establish client expectations you don’t want 3
  • 4. What’s the First Step After You WIN? Celebrate, of course! 4
  • 5. Next Step: Take Off the Trial Goggles 5 “Dude, my case looks AWESOME with these on.”
  • 6. Trial Goggles: Common Myths of “Copy & Paste” and the “Two Step” Appeal 6 “My trial lawyer said that all the hard work has already been done, and we’re TOTALLY going to win the appeal.”
  • 7. Estimating Appellate Attorney Fees: (cont’d) • The “form book” problem ▫ $5,000 is not a sufficient award ▫ Lawyers and judges need to be broken of this mindset • Amount depends on: ▫ Having a realistic view of the case – not just a repackaged view ▫ The basic steps required on appeal – not the Texas Two-Step • Several factors to consider in estimate ▫ Pre- and post-judgment activities ▫ Perfecting appeal, pre-briefing activity, legal research, drafting and editing, analyzing your opponent’s brief, etc. ▫ SCOTX proceedings, if any ▫ Post-appeal activity • Even if you don’t get everything you ask for, the exercise is useful in client counseling 7
  • 8. The Actual Fee Award: • Properly prove up and secure the award: ▫ Just like any fees: Sufficient evidence required! ▫ Consider bifurcating trial ▫ Award must be conditioned on appellate success ▫ Post-judgment interest is allowed on all attorney’s fees, but it does not begin to accrue on appellate fees until the appellate court renders judgment • … Or successfully defend against the award • Advise your client about realistic expectations and appellate strategy 8
  • 9. Crafting a Proposed Judgment: • Should you file a motion for judgment? ▫ If you lost, and you’re the movant, approve as to form only and use prefatory language (775 S.W.2d 632) ▫ Otherwise, risk waiving appellate rights • Judgment elements ▫ Describe the parties and proceedings ▫ Relief awarded on the merits / election of remedies ▫ Attorney fees awarded – detailed breakdown ▫ Pre-and post-judgment interest – a (boring) CLE talk unto itself ▫ Costs ▫ Language of finality and execution ▫ Dated signature line for judge 9
  • 10. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law • Beware! It’s more complicated than you think. • Remember the Big Picture/Purpose: ▫ Winner: Protect your winning judgment ▫ Loser: (1) Narrow the issues for appeal (2) Let there be reversible error ▫ Both: Extend appellate deadlines (sometimes) 10
  • 11. FOF/COL (cont’d) If properly & timely requested, then: • Appropriate & Required following ▫ Bench trials and ▫ Issues tried to the bench • Appropriate but Discretionary following ▫ Appealable order/judgment upon evidentiary hearing and ▫ Appealable interlocutory orders • Family Code: special rules 11
  • 12. FOF/COL (cont’d) • Not appropriate to request, file, or consider on appeal when: ▫ Judgment is rendered as a matter of law on undisputed material facts ▫ Non-evidentiary dismissals and defaults • No extension of appellate deadlines 12
  • 13. FOF/COL (cont’d) • 1st Request: 20 days from Judgment ▫ Winner submits Proposed FOF/COL ▫ 1st Deadline for Entry: 20 days from Request • 2nd Request: 30 days from Request ▫ “Past Due Notice” ▫ 2nd Deadline for Entry: 40 days from original request • 3rd Request: 10 days from Entry of FOF/COL ▫ “Request for Additional/Amended” (+ Objections?) ▫ 3rd Deadline for Entry: 10 days from 3rd Request 13
  • 14. Post-Verdict Error Preservation: • Most errors are preserved during trial • But remember post-verdict preservation: ▫ TRAP 33.1 ▫ TRCP 301, 324, 329b • Jury trial: You MUST file a MNT (and pay the FEE) within 30 days of judgment to raise: ▫ Factual sufficiency ▫ Complaint on which evidence must be heard (i.e., jury misconduct or newly discovered evidence) ▫ Inadequacy or excessiveness of damages ▫ Incurable jury argument not already ruled on 14
  • 15. Post-Verdict Error Preservation (cont’d) • Jury trial: To preserve legal sufficiency challenges, file: ▫ Motion for JNOV ▫ Motion to disregard the jury’s answer to a fact issue ▫ Motion for new trial specifically raising the complaint ▫ Preserved during trial by motion for directed verdict or charge objection • If a Motion for NEW TRIAL all you bring, then a NEW TRIAL is the most you’ll get! 15
  • 16. Superseding & Enforcing the Judgment: • Perfecting appeal does NOT suspend! • Methods ▫ Bond or cash deposit ▫ Written agreement ▫ Alternate security as ordered by the court • Calculation of security for a money judgment: ▫ Compensatory damages awarded in the judgment ▫ Interest for the estimated duration of the appeal ▫ Costs awarded in the judgment ▫ But not attorney fees unless they are a separate element of damages (sigh…) 16
  • 17. Some Forthcoming Free Tools: • supersedeascalculator.com ▫ Online form that calculates amount of security needed to supersede a particular judgment ▫ Currently in development • postjudgmentinterestcalculator.com ▫ Online form that calculates postjudgment interest and judgment payoff amount ▫ Should go live any day • Bookmark the sites for later reference or email todd@appealsplus.com to get access when they are available 17
  • 18. Other Supersedeas Issues: • Supersedeas caps ▫ LESSER of 50% debtor’s net worth or $25M ▫ Net worth affidavit + TRAP 24.2(c) = STAY pending a potential contest ▫ Negative net worth = Nø bond ▫ Makes it easier for debtors to appeal • Adjustment of supersedeas amount ▫ Proof of “substantial economic harm” = deviate from formula ▫ Trial court retains jurisdiction to adjust amount and type of security ▫ Court of appeals can review on motion 18 He’s missing all the important stuff!
  • 20. Calculating the Deadline to Perfect Appeal: • Runs from date that judgment or order is SIGNED ▫ TRAP 26.1, with limited exceptions • Deadline varies by type of appeal ▫ Regular appeal: 30 days ▫ Accelerated appeal: 20 days ▫ Restricted appeal: 6 months ▫ Cross-appeal: 30 days from judgment or 14 days from 1st NOA (if timely) • Motion for extension of time is available ▫ TRAP 10.1, TRAP 26.3 20
  • 21. Steps to Perfect Appeal: • Notice of Appeal (TRAP 25.1(c)) ▫ File in trial court only ▫ Special language required for:  accelerated appeal  restricted appeals ▫ Consider if cross-appeal is necessary  (vs. cross-issue) • Filing fee: $205 21
  • 22. Other Initial Steps: • Docketing Statement ▫ Was specific to each court’s website ▫ Now it is UNIFORM in all courts ▫ Download and complete electronically ▫ Must file “promptly” after NOA (TRAP 32) • E-filing is now mandatory in appellate courts ▫ Read the rules to avoid getting bounced ▫ Redaction – watch for confidential information ▫ Court websites have helpful resources 22
  • 23. Other Initial Steps (cont’d) • Every Texas attorney is now required to register an email address for service through the MyTexasBar page 23
  • 24. Other Initial Steps(cont’d) • Register for CaseMail (electronic updates) as soon as the appeal is docketed to receive notification of “case events” 24
  • 25. Other Initial Steps(cont’d) • Request Clerk’s & Reporter’s Records ▫ Written request, served on all parties ▫ Make arrangements to pay ▫ Specify contents – but don’t request unnecessary contents ▫ Can request supplementation ▫ Clerk has deadline to file, but often takes longer ▫ Briefing deadline runs from filing of record 25
  • 26. Other Initial Steps(cont’d) • Get a copy of the record • CaseMail will tell you when filed • But never pay a trial-court clerk or a court reporter for the record • Getting a copy by: ▫ Calling the appellate clerk and asking if they’ll email or burn to disc ▫ Better yet, take advantage of the brand-new Attorney Portal 26
  • 30. Advising the Client About the Realistic Expectations for Appeal: • Two key questions: 1. Should we appeal? 2. If so, which issues should we raise? 30
  • 31. Expectations Analysis: • Factors to consider: ▫ Standard of review ▫ Chances of success ▫ Likely costs / expenses ▫ Anticipated timing / overall duration ▫ Temperament of our potential panel on these issues ▫ Settlement possibilities and impact of appeal 31
  • 32. Helpful Resources: • Office of Court Administration website ▫ Statistics for every court in the state ▫ Dispositions and average times • Reasons for Reversal ▫ Breaks down statistics ▫ By court and type of case • An appellate lawyer! 32
  • 34. D. Todd Smith Smith Law Group LLLP www.appealsplus.com 34

Editor's Notes

  1. Objective: To review several issues that become critical once a jury has reached a verdict.
  2. Much of the talk focuses on matters from the verdict forward. Appellate attorney fees require advance work, so we’re going to address them first. Large enough cases warrant designating a separate expert on appellate fees. “This appeal will be easy. We already did all the research and drafting for the MSJ. We just need to turn that into a brief, which we could do in a day, and we’ll be done!”
  3. “Trial goggles” are much like “beer goggles.” A trial lawyer’s intoxication with the “thrill of the case” leads to a distorted view of the facts and legal authorities in dispute, causing the trial lawyer to lose objectivity.
  4. The key to successful post-verdict work is re-gaining objectivity. Either take a step back and the trial goggles off, or consult with someone who never put them on in the first place.
  5. Mindset doesn’t serve anyone. Client will think that this is what an appeal should cost. Doesn’t serve anyone’s interest. Take the goggles off again once you get to SCOTX. You’re writing for a different audience with a different perspective once again.
  6. Think twice about filing a motion for judgment if you’re planning to appeal. The objective in judgment drafting is certainty. You don’t want litigation over what the judgment means. Go over attorney fee breakdown from paper—this may help dispel the “form book mindset” that has tended to downplay the cost of an appeal. May also reduce risk of remand/preserve portions of award if appellate court finds fault with one element. Interest: refer to statutes identified in paper
  7. Tip: In state practice, the clerk, not the court, approves the bond initially. Avoid headaches and further litigation by contacting opposing counsel and trying to reach agreement on supersedeas amount.
  8. Lynn Liberato & Kent Rutter, Reasons for Reversal in the Courts of Appeals, 48 Hous. L. Rev. 993 (2012)