Downloaded 17 times
More Related Content
Similar to 20160524 ibm fast data meetup
![Vibe Coding vs. Spec-Driven Development [Free Meetup]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/vibecodingvsspecdrivendevelopment-251209105622-43f455e7-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
20160524 ibm fast data meetup
- 1. Scala: Lingua Francaof Fast Data Jamie Allen Sr. Director of Global Solutions Architects
- 2. • Why Scala? •Who is doing this? • What is Fast Data? • Architecting for Fast Data Agenda
- 3. • Cloud portabilityversus native control • Application correctness versus speed of development • Modularity versus global namespace • Concise syntax versus boilerplate • Multi-threaded simplicity via abstractions versus low-level control Tradeoffs
- 4. • REPL • Typesafety • Modularity • Concise syntax • Multi-threaded simplicity • Data-centric semantics • Managed runtime for cloud portability • Ecosystem Scala is the local optimum
- 5. Scala is thelocal optimum
- 6. The JVM isa primary reason for Scala’s success
- 7. • No REPLor Notebook • Not a data-centric language, particularly collections semantics Why not Java?
- 8. • Data-centric language,has all of the wonderful collections semantics we want • No type safety • No modularity Why not Python?
- 9. • Weak typesafety • Collections are too elemental • Native execution is a non-starter, so Go is the only option • Garbage collection is not generational Why not Go or C++?
- 10. • Scala justso happened to fit well in this space • Performance • Correctness • Conciseness • Scala will evolve • Other languages will come in time Scala is NOT the end of the road
- 11. Who is doingthis?
- 13. One Caveat: ApacheBeam and TensorFlow
- 14. Why Scala? At thetime we started, I really wanted a PL that supports a language-integrated interface (where people write functions inline, etc)… However, I also wanted to be on the JVM in order to easily interact with the Hadoop filesystem and data formats for that. Scala was the only somewhat popular JVM language that offered this kind of functional syntax and was also statically typed (letting us have some control over performance), so we chose that. Today there might be an argument to make the first version of the API in Java with Java 8, but we also benefitted from other aspects of Scala in Spark, like type inference, pattern matching, actor libriaries, etc. Matei Zaharia, creator of Spark
- 15. What is FastData?
- 16. A bit ofhistory: Hadoop
- 17. YARN HDFS MR job #1 MRjob #2 Flume Sqoop DBs Slave Node DiskDiskDiskDiskDisk Node Mgr Data Node Master Resource Manager Name Node Worker
- 18. Hadoop strengths • Lowestcapital expenditure for big data • Excellent for ingesting and integrating diverse datasets • Flexible • Classic analytics (aggregations and data warehousing) • Machine learning
- 19. Hadoop weaknesses • Complexadministration • YARN requires dedicated cluster • MapReduce foibles • Poor performance • Imperative programming model • No stream processing support
- 20. Fast Data withSpark
- 22. Spark • 100x fasteras a replacement for Hadoop MapReduce • Uses much fewer machines and resources • Incredible support from the community and enterprise
- 23. Spark use cases •Primarily anomaly detection • Risk management • Fraud detection • Odds recalculation • Spam filters • Update search engine results quickly
- 24. • Spark hadit with RDDs • They removed it with the DataFrames API • Brought it back with DataSets, but not as comprehensively as RDDs Type safety
- 25. Why not Flink? •Flink has much better stream handling for low latency systems that Spark currently lacks • Event timing • Watermarks • Triggers • Exactly-once semantics (assuming connections hold) • Pipeline portability via Apache Beam integration
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30. Traditional application architectures andplatforms are obsolete. Gartner
- 31. How do weavoid messing this up?
- 32. • At theAPI • In our source • For our data We want isolation Wikipedia, Creative Commons, created by DFoerster
- 33. We want realisticdata management • Use CQRS and Event Sourcing, not CRUD • Transactions, especially distributed, will not work • Consistency is an anti-pattern at scale • Distributed locks and shared data will limit you • Data fabrics break all of these conventions Think in terms of compensation, not prevention. Kevin Webber, Lightbend
- 34. We want toACID v2 • Associativity, not Atomicity • Commutativity, not Consistency • Idempotent, not Isolation • Distributed, not Durable Wikipedia, Creative Commons, created by Weston.pace
- 35.
- 36.
- 48. Learning Spark • Goto http://bigdatauniversity.com, built by IBM
Editor's Notes
- #37 One version of the emerging Fast Data Architecture. For today’s talk, I won’t go through it in detail, but this reflects some industry trends among open-source tools (popularity of Spark Streaming, Kafka, and Cassandra), plus our view of the Typesafe Reactive Platform as the glue that integrates it all, lets you implement the rest of the micro services you need, and provides the low latency streaming through Akka Streams that Spark doesn’t provide. The last slide has a link to a white paper I wrote that goes through this diagram in detail, along with several example use cases.
- #38 It’s very common to combine Spark Streaming, Kafka, and Cassandra (or another distributed, NoSQL database). In fact, this “troika” has become a de facto standard component of modern, stream-oriented architectures.
- #39 While Spark, Kafka, and Cassandra are de facto standard core components, you also need a platform for resource management and other needs, plus “glue” to tie everything together. Hence, the “SMACK stack”: S - Spark (and Scala?) M - Mesos A - Akka C - Cassandra K - Kafka
- #40 Discuss all the components in the context of data flow. First, you will have streaming data from many sources, web requests and other external Internet traffic, you’ll have services communicating with you. If they follow the Reactive Streams standard, then they can be ingested by Akka Streams. Finally, lots of internal data like logs, files FTPed into your environment, etc. will be ingested.
- #41 Reactive Streams follow a standard for an out-of-band, resilient backpressure mechanism that provides flow control. It only describes the behavior of a single stream with 1+ producers and 1+ consumers, but these streams are composable; a graph of reactive streams effectively provide end-to-end flow control.
- #42 Use the Lightbend Reactive Platform as “glue” for the other large components, implemented as microservices. Web requests (e.g., REST) can be handled by Play, which you can also use to implement user interfaces. Reactive Stream-Compliant sources can be ingested by Akka Streams, which supports a low-latency, per-event processing model.
- #43 Use Kafka to ingest “ephemeral” stream data (which can’t be replied if lost downstream). Kafka has enormous scalability and durability. It’s a great place to capture your streams, which can then be processed with Akka Streams or with Spark Streaming.
- #44 One use of Kafka is to solve the problem of N*M direct links between producers and consumers. This is hard to manage and it couples services to directly, which is fragile when a given service needs to be scaled up through replication or replacement and sometimes in the protocol that both ends need to speak.
- #45 So Kafka can function as a central hub, yet it’s distributed and scalable so it isn’t a bottleneck or single point of failure.
- #46 For sophisticated stream processing, where richer analytics (like “online” machine learning) is required and higher latencies can be tolerated, use Spark Streaming, which implements a mini batch model, where data is processed in “chunks”, defined by time windows as small as 1 second.
- #47 Processing results can be written back to Kafka for downstream consumption. For permanent storage, right a database, like Cassandra, when fast record-level CRUD is required, or write to a distributed file system, when cheaper storage is desired and “table-scan” access patterns are most important.
- #48 This architecture is agnostic to the platform. We like Mesos, the next-generation, general-purpose infrastructure for cluster resource and application management, but it works with YARN, too. You can deploy on premise (e.g., on “bare metal” hardware) or in a cloud environment.