The document discusses Salman Rushdie's critique of Richard Attenborough's film "Gandhi". It summarizes Rushdie's arguments that the film appeals to Western audiences for three reasons: 1) it portrays India as spiritual and mystical, 2) it depicts Gandhi as a leader of poverty and simplicity sacrificed for ideals, and 3) it suggests revolutions can be non-violent. It also notes debate around omissions in the film but says it aims to be a biography, not political history. In conclusion, it argues the film's opulent form overwhelms and crushes the ascetic man, Gandhi, at its center.