SlideShare a Scribd company logo
16 - 1
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Cost Allocation: Joint Products
and Byproducts
Chapter 16
16 - 2
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 1
Identify the splitoff point(s)
in a joint-cost situation.
16 - 3
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Joint-Cost Basics
Joint products
Joint costs
Separable costs
Splitoff point
Byproduct
16 - 4
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Joint-Cost Basics
Raw milk
Cream Liquid Skim
16 - 5
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Joint-Cost Basics
Coal
Gas Benzyl Tar
16 - 6
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 2
Distinguish joint products
from byproducts.
16 - 7
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Joint Products and Byproducts
Sales Value
High Low
Main Products
Joint Products Byproducts
16 - 8
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 3
Explain why joint costs should be
allocated to individual products.
16 - 9
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Why Allocate Joint Costs?
• to compute inventory cost and cost of goods sold
• to determine cost reimbursement under contracts
• for insurance settlement computations
• for rate regulation
• for litigation purposes
16 - 10
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 4
Allocate joint costs using
four different methods.
16 - 11
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Approaches to Allocating
Joint Costs
Approach 2:
Physical measure
Approach 1:
Market based
Two basic ways to allocate
joint costs to products are:
16 - 12
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Approach 1: Market-based Data
Sales value at splitoff method
Estimated net realizable value (NRV) method
Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method
16 - 13
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Allocating Joint Costs Example
10,000 units of A at a
selling price of $10 = $100,000
10,500 units of B at a
selling price of $30 = $315,000
11,500 units of C at a
selling price of $20 = $230,00
Joint processing
cost is $200,000
Splitoff point
16 - 14
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Allocating Joint Costs Example
A B C Total
Sales Value $100,000 $315,000 $230,000 $645,000
Allocation of
Joint Cost
100 ÷ 645 31,008
315 ÷ 645 97,674
230 ÷ 645 71,318
200,000
Gross margin $ 68,992 $217,326 $158,682 $445,000
16 - 15
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Sales Value at Splitoff
Method Example
Assume all of the units produced
of B and C were sold.
2,500 units of A (25%)
remain in inventory.
What is the gross margin
percentage of each product?
16 - 16
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Sales Value at Splitoff
Method Example
Product A Revenues: 7,500 units × $10.00 $75,000
Cost of goods sold:
Joint product costs $31,008
Less ending inventory
$31,008 × 25% 7,752 23,256
Gross margin $51,744
16 - 17
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Sales Value at Splitoff
Method Example
Product A:
($75,000 – $ 23,256) ÷ $75,000 = 69%
Product B:
($315,000 – $97,674) ÷ $315,000 = 69%
Product C:
($230,000 – $71,318) ÷ $230,000 = 69%
16 - 18
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example
Assume that Oklahoma Company can process
products A, B, and, C further into A1, B1, and C1.
The new sales values after further processing are:
A1:
10,000 × $12.00
= $120,000
B1:
10,500 × $33.00
= $346,500
C1:
11,500 × $21.00
= $241,500
16 - 19
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example
Additional processing (separable) costs are as follows:
A1: $35,000 B1: $46,500 C1: $51,500
What is the estimated net realizable value of each
product at the splitoff point?
16 - 20
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example
Product A1: $120,000 – $35,000 = $85,000
Product B1: $346,500 – $46,500 = $300,000
Product C1: $241,500 – $51,500 = $190,000
How much of the joint cost is allocated
to each product?
16 - 21
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example
To A1:
85 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $29,565
To B1:
300 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $104,348
To C1:
190 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $66,087
16 - 22
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example
Allocated Separable Inventory
joint costs costs costs
A1 $ 29,565 $ 35,000 $ 64,565
B1 104,348 46,500 150,848
C1 66,087 51,500 117,587
Total $200,000 $133,000 $333,000
16 - 23
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
This method entails three steps:
Step 1:
Compute the overall gross-margin percentage.
Step 2:
Use the overall gross-margin percentage
and deduct the gross margin from the
final sales values to obtain the total
costs that each product should bear.
16 - 24
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
Step 3:
Deduct the expected separable costs from the
total costs to obtain the joint-cost allocation.
16 - 25
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
What is the expected final sales value of total
production during the accounting period?
Product A1: $120,000
Product B1: 346,500
Product C1: 241,500
Total $708,000
16 - 26
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
Step 1:
Compute the overall gross-margin percentage.
Expected final sales value $708,000
Deduct joint and separable costs 333,000
Gross margin $375,000
Gross margin percentage:
$375,000 ÷ $708,000 = 52.966%
16 - 27
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
Step 2:
Deduct the gross margin.
Sales Gross Cost of
Value Margin Goods sold
Product A1: $120,000 $ 63,559 $ 56,441
Product B1: 346,500 183,527 162,973
Product C1: 241,500 127,913 113,587
Total $708,000 $375,000 $333,000
($1 rounding)
16 - 28
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
Step 3:
Deduct separable costs.
Cost of Separable Joint costs
goods sold costs allocated
Product A1: $ 56,441 $ 35,000 $ 21,441
Product B1: 162,973 46,500 116,473
Product C1: 113,587 51,500 62,087
Total $333,000 $133,000 $200,000
16 - 29
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Approach 2: Physical
Measure Method Example
$200,000 joint cost
20,000
pounds A
48,000
pounds B
12,000
pounds C
Product A
$50,000
Product B
$120,000
Product C
$30,000
16 - 30
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 5
Explain why the sales value at
splitoff method is preferred
when allocating joint costs.
16 - 31
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Choosing a Method
Why is the sales value at splitoff method widely used?
It measures the value
of the joint product
immediately.
It does not anticipate
subsequent management
decisions.
It uses a
meaningful basis.
It is simple.
16 - 32
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Choosing a Method
The purpose of the joint-cost allocation is
important in choosing the allocation method.
The physical-measure method is a more
appropriate method to use in rate regulation.
16 - 33
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Avoiding Joint Cost Allocation
Some companies refrain from allocating joint
costs and instead carry their inventories
at estimated net realizable value.
16 - 34
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 6
Explain why joint costs
are irrelevant in a
sell-or-process-further decision.
16 - 35
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Irrelevance of Joint Costs
for Decision Making
Assume that products A, B, and C can be sold
at the splitoff point or processed further
into A1, B1, and C1.
Selling Selling Additional
Units price price costs
10,000 A: $10 A1: $12 $35,000
10,500 B: $30 B1: $33 $46,500
11,500 C: $20 C1: $21 $51,500
16 - 36
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Irrelevance of Joint Costs
for Decision Making
Should A, B, or C be sold at the splitoff
point or processed further?
Product A: Incremental revenue $20,000
– Incremental cost $35,000 = ($15,000)
Product B: Incremental revenue $31,500
– Incremental cost $46,500 = ($15,000)
Product C: Incremental revenue $11,500
– Incremental cost $51,500 = ($40,000)
16 - 37
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Learning Objective 7
Account for byproducts
using two different methods.
16 - 38
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method A:
The production method recognizes byproducts
at the time their production is completed.
Method B:
The sale method delays recognition of
byproducts until the time of their sale.
16 - 39
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Example
Main Products Byproducts
(Yards) (Yards)
Production 1,000 400
Sales 800 300
Ending inventory 200 100
Sales price $13/yard $1.00/yard
No beginning finished goods inventory
16 - 40
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Example
Joint production costs for joint
(main) products and byproducts:
Material $2,000
Manufacturing labor 3,000
Manufacturing overhead 4,000
Total production cost $9,000
16 - 41
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method A
Method A: The production method
What is the value of ending inventory
of joint (main) products?
$9,000 total production cost
– $400 net realizable value of the byproduct
= $8,600 net production cost for the joint products
16 - 42
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method A
200 ÷ 1,000 × $8,600 = $1,720 is the value
assigned to the 200 yards in ending inventory.
What is the cost of goods sold?
Joint production costs $9,000
Less byproduct revenue 400
Less main product inventory 1,720
Cost of goods sold $6,880
16 - 43
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method A
Income Statement (Method A)
Revenues: (800 yards × $13) $10,400
Cost of goods sold 6,880
Gross margin $ 3,520
What is the gross margin percentage?
$3,520 ÷ $10,400 = 33.85%
16 - 44
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method A
What are the inventoriable costs?
Main product: 200 ÷ 1,000 × $8,600 = $1,720
Byproduct: 100 × $1.00 = $100
16 - 45
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Journal Entries Method A
Work in Process 2,000
Accounts Payable 2,000
To record direct materials purchased and used
in production
Work in Process 7,000
Various Accounts 7,000
To record conversion costs in the joint process
16 - 46
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Journal Entries Method A
Byproduct Inventory 400
Finished Goods 8,600
Work in Process 9,000
To record cost of goods completed
Cost of Goods Sold 6,880
Finished Goods 6,880
To record the cost of the main product sold
16 - 47
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Journal Entries Method A
Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400
Revenues 10,400
To record the sale of the main product
16 - 48
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method B
Method B: The sale method
What is the value of ending inventory of
joint (main) products?
200 ÷ 1,000 × $9,000 = $1,800
No value is assigned to the 400 yards of
byproducts at the time of production.
The $300 resulting from the sale of
byproducts is reported as revenues.
16 - 49
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method B
Income Statement (Method B)
Revenues: Main product (800 × $13) $10,400
Byproducts sold 300
Total revenues $10,700
Cost of goods sold:
Joint production costs 9,000
Less main product inventory 1,800 $ 7,200
Gross margin $ 3,200
16 - 50
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Accounting for Byproducts
Method B
What is the gross margin percentage?
$3,200 ÷ $10,700 = 29.91%
What are the inventoriable costs?
Main product: 200 ÷ 1,000 × $9,000 = $1,800
By-product: -0-
16 - 51
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Journal Entries Method B
Work in Process 2,000
Accounts Payable 2,000
To record direct materials purchased and used
in production
Work in Process 7,000
Various Accounts 7,000
To record conversion costs in the joint process
16 - 52
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Journal Entries Method B
Finished Goods 9,000
Work in Process 9,000
To record cost of goods completed
Cost of Goods Sold 7,200
Finished Goods 7,200
To record the cost of the main product sold
16 - 53
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
Journal Entries Method B
Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400
Revenues 10,400
To record the sale of the main product
Cash or Accounts Receivable 300
Revenues 300
To record the sale of the byproduct
16 - 54
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster
End of Chapter 16

More Related Content

Similar to 11ch16.ppt (20)

11ch17.ppt
11ch17.ppt11ch17.ppt
11ch17.ppt
 
11ch02.ppt
11ch02.ppt11ch02.ppt
11ch02.ppt
 
11ch22.ppt
11ch22.ppt11ch22.ppt
11ch22.ppt
 
11ch17
11ch1711ch17
11ch17
 
11ch07.ppt
11ch07.ppt11ch07.ppt
11ch07.ppt
 
11ch22
11ch2211ch22
11ch22
 
11ch07
11ch0711ch07
11ch07
 
DETERMINING HOW COSTS BEHAVE
DETERMINING HOW COSTS BEHAVEDETERMINING HOW COSTS BEHAVE
DETERMINING HOW COSTS BEHAVE
 
cost12eppt_16.ppt
cost12eppt_16.pptcost12eppt_16.ppt
cost12eppt_16.ppt
 
11ch11
11ch1111ch11
11ch11
 
11ch20.ppt
11ch20.ppt11ch20.ppt
11ch20.ppt
 
cost12eppt_03.ppt
cost12eppt_03.pptcost12eppt_03.ppt
cost12eppt_03.ppt
 
3 Cost-Volume Profit CVP.ppt
3 Cost-Volume Profit CVP.ppt3 Cost-Volume Profit CVP.ppt
3 Cost-Volume Profit CVP.ppt
 
11ch21.ppt
11ch21.ppt11ch21.ppt
11ch21.ppt
 
powerpoint Jobcost
powerpoint Jobcostpowerpoint Jobcost
powerpoint Jobcost
 
yrtyt
yrtytyrtyt
yrtyt
 
Job Order Costing
Job Order CostingJob Order Costing
Job Order Costing
 
cost12eppt_05.ppt
cost12eppt_05.pptcost12eppt_05.ppt
cost12eppt_05.ppt
 
Balance Scorecard.ppt
Balance Scorecard.pptBalance Scorecard.ppt
Balance Scorecard.ppt
 
Prilaku biaya
Prilaku biayaPrilaku biaya
Prilaku biaya
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
enxupq
 
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
yhkoc
 
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay
 
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
ewymefz
 
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
enxupq
 
一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单
ewymefz
 
Computer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage s
Computer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage sComputer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage s
Computer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage s
MAQIB18
 
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_CrimesInvestigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
StarCompliance.io
 

Recently uploaded (20)

一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
 
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year ReboundQ1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
 
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
 
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflowsTabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
 
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
 
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
 
Supply chain analytics to combat the effects of Ukraine-Russia-conflict
Supply chain analytics to combat the effects of Ukraine-Russia-conflictSupply chain analytics to combat the effects of Ukraine-Russia-conflict
Supply chain analytics to combat the effects of Ukraine-Russia-conflict
 
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization SampleJpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
 
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
 
2024-05-14 - Tableau User Group - TC24 Hot Topics - Tableau Pulse and Einstei...
2024-05-14 - Tableau User Group - TC24 Hot Topics - Tableau Pulse and Einstei...2024-05-14 - Tableau User Group - TC24 Hot Topics - Tableau Pulse and Einstei...
2024-05-14 - Tableau User Group - TC24 Hot Topics - Tableau Pulse and Einstei...
 
Slip-and-fall Injuries: Top Workers' Comp Claims
Slip-and-fall Injuries: Top Workers' Comp ClaimsSlip-and-fall Injuries: Top Workers' Comp Claims
Slip-and-fall Injuries: Top Workers' Comp Claims
 
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMIBusiness update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
 
Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research by Sebastian Kubitschk...
Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research by Sebastian Kubitschk...Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research by Sebastian Kubitschk...
Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research by Sebastian Kubitschk...
 
一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UPenn毕业证)宾夕法尼亚大学毕业证成绩单
 
社内勉強会資料_LLM Agents                              .
社内勉強会資料_LLM Agents                              .社内勉強会資料_LLM Agents                              .
社内勉強会資料_LLM Agents                              .
 
Webinar One View, Multiple Systems No-Code Integration of Salesforce and ERPs
Webinar One View, Multiple Systems No-Code Integration of Salesforce and ERPsWebinar One View, Multiple Systems No-Code Integration of Salesforce and ERPs
Webinar One View, Multiple Systems No-Code Integration of Salesforce and ERPs
 
Pre-ProductionImproveddsfjgndflghtgg.pptx
Pre-ProductionImproveddsfjgndflghtgg.pptxPre-ProductionImproveddsfjgndflghtgg.pptx
Pre-ProductionImproveddsfjgndflghtgg.pptx
 
How can I successfully sell my pi coins in Philippines?
How can I successfully sell my pi coins in Philippines?How can I successfully sell my pi coins in Philippines?
How can I successfully sell my pi coins in Philippines?
 
Computer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage s
Computer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage sComputer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage s
Computer Presentation.pptx ecommerce advantage s
 
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_CrimesInvestigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
 

11ch16.ppt

  • 1. 16 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Cost Allocation: Joint Products and Byproducts Chapter 16
  • 2. 16 - 2 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 1 Identify the splitoff point(s) in a joint-cost situation.
  • 3. 16 - 3 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Joint-Cost Basics Joint products Joint costs Separable costs Splitoff point Byproduct
  • 4. 16 - 4 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Joint-Cost Basics Raw milk Cream Liquid Skim
  • 5. 16 - 5 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Joint-Cost Basics Coal Gas Benzyl Tar
  • 6. 16 - 6 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 2 Distinguish joint products from byproducts.
  • 7. 16 - 7 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Joint Products and Byproducts Sales Value High Low Main Products Joint Products Byproducts
  • 8. 16 - 8 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 3 Explain why joint costs should be allocated to individual products.
  • 9. 16 - 9 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Why Allocate Joint Costs? • to compute inventory cost and cost of goods sold • to determine cost reimbursement under contracts • for insurance settlement computations • for rate regulation • for litigation purposes
  • 10. 16 - 10 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 4 Allocate joint costs using four different methods.
  • 11. 16 - 11 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Approaches to Allocating Joint Costs Approach 2: Physical measure Approach 1: Market based Two basic ways to allocate joint costs to products are:
  • 12. 16 - 12 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Approach 1: Market-based Data Sales value at splitoff method Estimated net realizable value (NRV) method Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method
  • 13. 16 - 13 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Allocating Joint Costs Example 10,000 units of A at a selling price of $10 = $100,000 10,500 units of B at a selling price of $30 = $315,000 11,500 units of C at a selling price of $20 = $230,00 Joint processing cost is $200,000 Splitoff point
  • 14. 16 - 14 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Allocating Joint Costs Example A B C Total Sales Value $100,000 $315,000 $230,000 $645,000 Allocation of Joint Cost 100 ÷ 645 31,008 315 ÷ 645 97,674 230 ÷ 645 71,318 200,000 Gross margin $ 68,992 $217,326 $158,682 $445,000
  • 15. 16 - 15 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Sales Value at Splitoff Method Example Assume all of the units produced of B and C were sold. 2,500 units of A (25%) remain in inventory. What is the gross margin percentage of each product?
  • 16. 16 - 16 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Sales Value at Splitoff Method Example Product A Revenues: 7,500 units × $10.00 $75,000 Cost of goods sold: Joint product costs $31,008 Less ending inventory $31,008 × 25% 7,752 23,256 Gross margin $51,744
  • 17. 16 - 17 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Sales Value at Splitoff Method Example Product A: ($75,000 – $ 23,256) ÷ $75,000 = 69% Product B: ($315,000 – $97,674) ÷ $315,000 = 69% Product C: ($230,000 – $71,318) ÷ $230,000 = 69%
  • 18. 16 - 18 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Estimated Net Realizable Value (NRV) Method Example Assume that Oklahoma Company can process products A, B, and, C further into A1, B1, and C1. The new sales values after further processing are: A1: 10,000 × $12.00 = $120,000 B1: 10,500 × $33.00 = $346,500 C1: 11,500 × $21.00 = $241,500
  • 19. 16 - 19 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Estimated Net Realizable Value (NRV) Method Example Additional processing (separable) costs are as follows: A1: $35,000 B1: $46,500 C1: $51,500 What is the estimated net realizable value of each product at the splitoff point?
  • 20. 16 - 20 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Estimated Net Realizable Value (NRV) Method Example Product A1: $120,000 – $35,000 = $85,000 Product B1: $346,500 – $46,500 = $300,000 Product C1: $241,500 – $51,500 = $190,000 How much of the joint cost is allocated to each product?
  • 21. 16 - 21 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Estimated Net Realizable Value (NRV) Method Example To A1: 85 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $29,565 To B1: 300 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $104,348 To C1: 190 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $66,087
  • 22. 16 - 22 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Estimated Net Realizable Value (NRV) Method Example Allocated Separable Inventory joint costs costs costs A1 $ 29,565 $ 35,000 $ 64,565 B1 104,348 46,500 150,848 C1 66,087 51,500 117,587 Total $200,000 $133,000 $333,000
  • 23. 16 - 23 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Constant Gross-Margin Percentage NRV Method This method entails three steps: Step 1: Compute the overall gross-margin percentage. Step 2: Use the overall gross-margin percentage and deduct the gross margin from the final sales values to obtain the total costs that each product should bear.
  • 24. 16 - 24 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Constant Gross-Margin Percentage NRV Method Step 3: Deduct the expected separable costs from the total costs to obtain the joint-cost allocation.
  • 25. 16 - 25 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Constant Gross-Margin Percentage NRV Method What is the expected final sales value of total production during the accounting period? Product A1: $120,000 Product B1: 346,500 Product C1: 241,500 Total $708,000
  • 26. 16 - 26 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Constant Gross-Margin Percentage NRV Method Step 1: Compute the overall gross-margin percentage. Expected final sales value $708,000 Deduct joint and separable costs 333,000 Gross margin $375,000 Gross margin percentage: $375,000 ÷ $708,000 = 52.966%
  • 27. 16 - 27 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Constant Gross-Margin Percentage NRV Method Step 2: Deduct the gross margin. Sales Gross Cost of Value Margin Goods sold Product A1: $120,000 $ 63,559 $ 56,441 Product B1: 346,500 183,527 162,973 Product C1: 241,500 127,913 113,587 Total $708,000 $375,000 $333,000 ($1 rounding)
  • 28. 16 - 28 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Constant Gross-Margin Percentage NRV Method Step 3: Deduct separable costs. Cost of Separable Joint costs goods sold costs allocated Product A1: $ 56,441 $ 35,000 $ 21,441 Product B1: 162,973 46,500 116,473 Product C1: 113,587 51,500 62,087 Total $333,000 $133,000 $200,000
  • 29. 16 - 29 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Approach 2: Physical Measure Method Example $200,000 joint cost 20,000 pounds A 48,000 pounds B 12,000 pounds C Product A $50,000 Product B $120,000 Product C $30,000
  • 30. 16 - 30 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 5 Explain why the sales value at splitoff method is preferred when allocating joint costs.
  • 31. 16 - 31 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Choosing a Method Why is the sales value at splitoff method widely used? It measures the value of the joint product immediately. It does not anticipate subsequent management decisions. It uses a meaningful basis. It is simple.
  • 32. 16 - 32 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Choosing a Method The purpose of the joint-cost allocation is important in choosing the allocation method. The physical-measure method is a more appropriate method to use in rate regulation.
  • 33. 16 - 33 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Avoiding Joint Cost Allocation Some companies refrain from allocating joint costs and instead carry their inventories at estimated net realizable value.
  • 34. 16 - 34 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 6 Explain why joint costs are irrelevant in a sell-or-process-further decision.
  • 35. 16 - 35 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making Assume that products A, B, and C can be sold at the splitoff point or processed further into A1, B1, and C1. Selling Selling Additional Units price price costs 10,000 A: $10 A1: $12 $35,000 10,500 B: $30 B1: $33 $46,500 11,500 C: $20 C1: $21 $51,500
  • 36. 16 - 36 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making Should A, B, or C be sold at the splitoff point or processed further? Product A: Incremental revenue $20,000 – Incremental cost $35,000 = ($15,000) Product B: Incremental revenue $31,500 – Incremental cost $46,500 = ($15,000) Product C: Incremental revenue $11,500 – Incremental cost $51,500 = ($40,000)
  • 37. 16 - 37 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Learning Objective 7 Account for byproducts using two different methods.
  • 38. 16 - 38 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method A: The production method recognizes byproducts at the time their production is completed. Method B: The sale method delays recognition of byproducts until the time of their sale.
  • 39. 16 - 39 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Example Main Products Byproducts (Yards) (Yards) Production 1,000 400 Sales 800 300 Ending inventory 200 100 Sales price $13/yard $1.00/yard No beginning finished goods inventory
  • 40. 16 - 40 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Example Joint production costs for joint (main) products and byproducts: Material $2,000 Manufacturing labor 3,000 Manufacturing overhead 4,000 Total production cost $9,000
  • 41. 16 - 41 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method A Method A: The production method What is the value of ending inventory of joint (main) products? $9,000 total production cost – $400 net realizable value of the byproduct = $8,600 net production cost for the joint products
  • 42. 16 - 42 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method A 200 ÷ 1,000 × $8,600 = $1,720 is the value assigned to the 200 yards in ending inventory. What is the cost of goods sold? Joint production costs $9,000 Less byproduct revenue 400 Less main product inventory 1,720 Cost of goods sold $6,880
  • 43. 16 - 43 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method A Income Statement (Method A) Revenues: (800 yards × $13) $10,400 Cost of goods sold 6,880 Gross margin $ 3,520 What is the gross margin percentage? $3,520 ÷ $10,400 = 33.85%
  • 44. 16 - 44 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method A What are the inventoriable costs? Main product: 200 ÷ 1,000 × $8,600 = $1,720 Byproduct: 100 × $1.00 = $100
  • 45. 16 - 45 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Journal Entries Method A Work in Process 2,000 Accounts Payable 2,000 To record direct materials purchased and used in production Work in Process 7,000 Various Accounts 7,000 To record conversion costs in the joint process
  • 46. 16 - 46 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Journal Entries Method A Byproduct Inventory 400 Finished Goods 8,600 Work in Process 9,000 To record cost of goods completed Cost of Goods Sold 6,880 Finished Goods 6,880 To record the cost of the main product sold
  • 47. 16 - 47 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Journal Entries Method A Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400 Revenues 10,400 To record the sale of the main product
  • 48. 16 - 48 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method B Method B: The sale method What is the value of ending inventory of joint (main) products? 200 ÷ 1,000 × $9,000 = $1,800 No value is assigned to the 400 yards of byproducts at the time of production. The $300 resulting from the sale of byproducts is reported as revenues.
  • 49. 16 - 49 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method B Income Statement (Method B) Revenues: Main product (800 × $13) $10,400 Byproducts sold 300 Total revenues $10,700 Cost of goods sold: Joint production costs 9,000 Less main product inventory 1,800 $ 7,200 Gross margin $ 3,200
  • 50. 16 - 50 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Accounting for Byproducts Method B What is the gross margin percentage? $3,200 ÷ $10,700 = 29.91% What are the inventoriable costs? Main product: 200 ÷ 1,000 × $9,000 = $1,800 By-product: -0-
  • 51. 16 - 51 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Journal Entries Method B Work in Process 2,000 Accounts Payable 2,000 To record direct materials purchased and used in production Work in Process 7,000 Various Accounts 7,000 To record conversion costs in the joint process
  • 52. 16 - 52 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Journal Entries Method B Finished Goods 9,000 Work in Process 9,000 To record cost of goods completed Cost of Goods Sold 7,200 Finished Goods 7,200 To record the cost of the main product sold
  • 53. 16 - 53 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Journal Entries Method B Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400 Revenues 10,400 To record the sale of the main product Cash or Accounts Receivable 300 Revenues 300 To record the sale of the byproduct
  • 54. 16 - 54 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster End of Chapter 16